Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 108 references

Ultrafast electronic coherence from slow phonons

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Impulsively driving slow phonons enhances long-range electronic correlations in a low-dimensional metal.

desk verdict A careful MPS study with a genuine non-obvious result, but the central 'slow phonons suppress disorder' claim is confounded by simultaneous reduction of the coupling strength. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.06939 v1 pith:KFRCBEPP submitted 2025-09-08 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-el

Mattia Moroder , Sebastian Paeckel , Matteo Mitrano , John Sous This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-el
keywords light-inducedsuperconductivityelectron-phononcouplinglong-rangeelectroniccoherenceultrafastdynamicsnonlinearphononicsdisorder-freelocalizationmatrixproductstateschargedensitywave
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that light can build genuine long-range electronic order—not just local pairing—by exciting low-frequency (slow) phonons in a metal. Using numerically exact simulations of a one-dimensional electron-phonon model, the authors show that an impulsive optical quench of slow phonons grows the staggered charge correlation by about twenty percent while suppressing spin correlations, a pattern they read as the onset of long-range phase coherence. The reason, they argue, is that slow phonons produce a narrow distribution of phonon number states, which weakens the effective dynamical disorder that fast phonons are known to create. If true, the result resolves an apparent dead end—previous fast-phonon studies found only disorder—and gives a concrete design rule for experiments aiming at transient superconducting or charge-ordered states.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective Hamiltonian derived by a canonical transformation into a squeezed phonon basis: the renormalized hopping J_eff, the pump-induced attraction U_eff = −2g_q²/ω, the effective onsite disorder potential ε_eff = 2g_q, and the shifted phonon frequency ω_eff. In this frame phonon occupations become conserved, so electronic observables are sums over fixed phonon-number sectors; that summation is what generates dynamical disorder, formally mapping onto disorder-free localization and Anderson localization. The mechanism works because lowering ω collapses the phonon-level spacing, narrowing the pump-created phonon-number distribution and thereby suppressing that

What would settle it

Fix g_q at 0.07 J and repeat the quench while scanning ω from π/2 J to π/10 J; if the staggered charge correlation C_π(t) no longer grows as ω decreases, the enhancement is due to the reduced coupling rather than the phonon frequency, and the paper's mechanism would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that impulsively driving low-frequency phonons enhances long-range electronic correlations in a low-dimensional metal, in contrast to the disorder-dominated dynamics found for fast phonons. In the one-dimensional half-filled model with nonlinear coupling, after applying a global displacement quench that mimics a pump, the staggered charge correlation C_π(t) grows roughly 20% at t = 12/J for ω = π/10 J, uniform pairing rises modestly, and staggered spin order drops. The authors attribute this to slow phonons suppressing dynamical disorder: in the squeezed-phonon frame the electron-phonon coupling becomes an effective onsite potential that acts like disorder, and the width

Load-bearing premise

The frequency sweep that drives the conclusion lowers the electron-phonon coupling together with the phonon frequency, so the claim that slow phonons themselves—rather than the weakened coupling—suppress the disorder is not separately tested.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Even a modest enhancement of local pairing can translate into significant long-range charge and pairing coherence when the phonons are slow, so local measures alone are not enough to judge whether light-induced order is present.
  • The phonon frequency, not just pump fluence or coupling strength, is a control parameter: slow phonons narrow the phonon-number distribution, reduce dynamical dephasing, and let correlations grow.
  • The same mechanism should operate in higher dimensions, where charge-density-wave order is less dominant, making light-induced transient superconductivity a plausible outcome rather than a 1D artifact.
  • Pump protocols that selectively populate a single or few phonon number states—for example π-pulse-inspired schemes—could mimic the slow-phonon narrowing effect and enhance phase coherence without requiring extremely low phonon energies.
  • After the coherence builds, residual disorder from finite phonon frequency may induce localization that freezes the non-equilibrium phase, potentially stabilizing a transient ordered state against thermalization at later times.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the frequency is the active variable, the same enhancement should appear at fixed coupling: a simulation sweeping ω from π/2 J to π/10 J with g_q held at 0.07 J would isolate the effect from the weaker-disorder artifact that clouds the current sweep.
  • The disorder-free-localization picture implies a two-stage evolution—early coherence growth followed by late-time freezing—which could be probed by extending simulations past t ≈ 12/J or by time-resolved diffuse-scattering experiments that track the phonon-number distribution width.
  • The narrowing criterion suggests a general pump-design rule: any protocol that puts the phonon population into one or few number states, not only low-frequency modes, should reproduce the slow-phonon effect, making the mechanism testable with existing selective-excitation techniques.
  • In two-dimensional or three-dimensional extensions, the competition from charge-density-wave order is weaker, so the same slow-phonon mechanism could stabilize true superconducting order more readily; a ladder or 2D tensor-network simulation would be a concrete next check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a one-dimensional half-filled tight-binding model of electrons nonlinearly coupled to local Einstein phonons, subject to an impulsive displacement pump. Using a projected-purification MPS method, the authors compute momentum-resolved charge, pairing, and spin correlations after the pump. Their central result is that for slow phonons (ω = π/10 J, g_q = 0.07 J), the staggered charge correlation C_π(t) grows by about 20% at t ≈ 12/J, while fast phonons at ω = π/2 J flatten the momentum-resolved correlations. They attribute this to slow phonons narrowing the phonon number distribution, thereby suppressing pump-induced dynamical disorder, and support this with an effective model (Eq. 3) and phonon state tomography (Fig. 5). They argue this is the first numerically exact demonstration of light-induced enhancement of long-range charge/pairing coherence tendencies mediated by phonons.

Significance. If the mechanistic claim is correct, the paper provides an important non-perturbative counterexample to the earlier fast-phonon result that impulsive pumping always creates dynamical disorder and suppresses long-range electronic coherence. The numerical work is careful: convergence with bond dimensions χ_max = 1500–2500, phonon cutoff d_ν = 40, discarded weight ε = 1e-10, system sizes L = 20 and 32, and finite-size imbalance analysis are reported. The central simulation result—enhancement of C_π at ω = π/10 J—is a direct, parameter-free MPS result. However, the paper's central mechanistic attribution ('slow phonons suppress dynamical disorder') rests on a frequency sweep in which g_q is simultaneously varied, so the role of ω is not cleanly established. The paper is significant as a numerical observation, but its main physical conclusion needs additional controlled simulations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 5; PST analysis] The frequency sweep used to establish the slow-phonon mechanism is confounded. In Fig. 3, ω is reduced from π/2 J to π/10 J while g_q is simultaneously reduced from 0.35 J to 0.07 J to keep g_q/ω fixed. In the exact Hamiltonian, Eq. (2), the electron-phonon coupling amplitude is directly g_q; in the effective model, Eq. (3), the disorder strength is ε_eff = 2g_q with no explicit ω dependence. Thus the observed transition from a flattened C_k(t) at high ω to an enhanced C_π(t) at low ω could be caused entirely by the fivefold decrease in g_q, independent of any frequency-induced narrowing of the phonon distribution. The authors should perform a controlled sweep, e.g., fix g_q = 0.07 J and vary ω over the stable range, or vary ω_eff at fixed ε_eff in the effective model. Without such a control, the central claim that slow phonons suppress dynamical disorder is not established.
  2. [Effective model, Eq. (3)] The phonon state tomography evidence is subject to the same confound. Fig. 5 compares P(N_ph) at ω = π/10 J (g_q = 0.07 J) with ω = π/2 J (g_q = 0.35 J). The initial coherent state has the same Poisson distribution regardless of ω or g_q. A smaller g_q means a weaker nonlinear coupling, so the phonon distribution should naturally remain closer to the initial Poisson distribution. The observed narrowing at low ω may therefore be a trivial consequence of weaker electron-phonon coupling, not of the phonon frequency. The authors should show P(N_ph) at fixed g_q for different ω, or normalize by the g_q-dependent coupling strength, to support the frequency-narrowing mechanism.
  3. [Effective model] The effective model is used to support the disorder-suppression mechanism, but because ε_eff = 2g_q is independent of ω, the model itself does not contain a direct frequency dependence in the disorder amplitude. The model's only ω-dependent ingredient is ω_eff = ω − g_q^2/ω and the fixed ratio g_q/ω. The comparison in Fig. 4 between exact and effective results is shown for the same three (ω, g_q) pairs, so it inherits the confound. A decisive test would be to keep ε_eff fixed and vary ω_eff (or vary the phonon frequency at fixed g_q in the exact model) and show that C_π enhancement persists. This would isolate the level-spacing collapse from the coupling-strength effect.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods] The expression for J_eff is typeset as 'J e^{-1/2 (g_q/ω)^2(α^4+2α^2+1)}'; this should be written unambiguously as J exp[...] to avoid confusion with the hopping amplitude J times an exponential factor.
  2. [Supplementary, Fig. 9] The discarded weight is stated as ε = 1e-10 and the bond dimension is allowed to grow by at most 100 per time step. It would be useful to state whether the same convergence parameters were used for all data points, especially the PST sampling in Fig. 5.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The ω → 0 limit is presented as informative, but the exact model uses ω = 0 with g_q = 0.1 J while the effective model uses ω = 0.01 J. The nominal stability constraint −ω/4 < g_q < ω/4 is violated at ω = 0; the authors should either explain how the dynamics remain well-defined or mark this as an extrapolation.
  4. [None] The caption states that C_0(t) and S_0(t) are conserved. This is true for the total charge and total spin densities, but the statement could be clarified because the Fourier transform at k = 0 is the uniform component, not the local density.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central MPS results are computed from the full Hamiltonian, and the effective model is a post hoc diagnostic, not a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claims—the ~20% growth of Cπ(t) at ω=π/10 J and the momentum-resolved flattening at high ω—are obtained from numerically exact MPS time evolution of the full Hamiltonian in Eqs. (1)–(2), with convergence checks in the Supplementary against bond dimension and system size. No parameter in those simulations is fitted to the target correlation; gq, ω, and α are inputs. The effective model of Eq. (3) is derived in the Supplementary via a unitary squeezing transformation and a weak-coupling expansion, not assumed or fitted, and it is used afterward as a diagnostic to rationalize the exact dynamics. Its parameters (Jeff, Ueff, εeff, ωeff) are analytic functions of the same inputs and are not tuned to match Cπ(t). The PST analysis in Fig. 5 decomposes the same wavefunction and is again not a separate predictive fit. The paper cites prior work sharing authors (Refs. [21] and [28]), but the load-bearing content—phonon-number conservation in the squeezed frame and the PST sampling procedure—is re-derived or described within this paper, and the main conclusion does not rest on those citations alone. The reviewer's concern that the Fig. 3 frequency sweep is confounded (gq drops from 0.35J to 0.07J as ω drops, while εeff = 2gq has no explicit ω dependence) is a legitimate scientific/interpretation issue, but it is not circularity: the paper does not define 'slow-phonon narrowing' in terms of the observed Cπ, and the simulation output is not equal to the input by construction. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained for its main result, with only minor, non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, fields, or conserved quantities. 'Dynamical disorder' is a label borrowed from prior work, not a new entity. The central claim depends on the chosen model parameters and the numerical and effective-model assumptions listed above.

free parameters (3)
  • phonon frequency omega/J = pi/2, pi/5, pi/10
    Swept at fixed gq/omega; the central comparison variable.
  • electron-phonon coupling gq/J = 0.35, 0.14, 0.07
    Chosen together with omega to keep gq/omega approximately 0.22; confounds the frequency effect with coupling strength.
  • pump displacement alpha = sqrt(2), sqrt(3), sqrt(4)
    Proxy for pump fluence; |alpha|^2 = 2, 3, 4 studied in Fig. 3.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Stability bound -omega/4 < gq < omega/4 for the nonlinear electron-phonon model.
    Derived from atomic-limit oscillator stiffness renormalization in Refs [9,21]; restricts the accessible parameter range and explains the fixed gq/omega scaling.
  • domain assumption Initial state is the T=0 ground state |FS> tensor |alpha> after a global displacement quench.
    Models impulsive optical excitation of a dipole-active phonon; ignores thermal phonon occupations and pulse-shape effects; stated in Methods and SI Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption Effective Hamiltonian Eq. (3) from the squeezed-phonon basis plus expansion to second order in gq/omega.
    Inherited from Refs [9,21]; used only for interpretation, and gq/omega approximately 0.22 is not a very small expansion parameter.
  • domain assumption MPS truncations (chi_max = 2000, d_nu = 40, epsilon = 1e-10) and PST sampling (3000 samples) are sufficient for the reported observables.
    Supported by supplement convergence checks but not machine-checked.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrafast electronic coherence from slow phonons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KFRCBEPP

@misc{pith2026250906939,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrafast electronic coherence from slow phonons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KFRCBEPP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06939}
}
read the original abstract

Light offers a route to engineer new phases of matter far from equilibrium, including transient states suggestive of superconducting, charge-ordered, and excitonic ordering behavior. Yet it remains unclear how optical excitation can dynamically produce long-range phase coherence-a defining feature of true order such as superconductivity-rather than merely enhancing local pairing. Here we show that impulsively driven low-frequency phonons enhance long-range electronic correlations in a low-dimensional metal. Through numerically exact simulations, we demonstrate that slow phonons suppress dynamical disorder, enabling buildup of coherence and enhancement of charge (and pairing) orders. These findings provide direct evidence that light can mediate enhancement of long-range order and suggest that future experimental strategies-such as the design of selective excitations of narrow phonon distributions to limit dephasing-may offer viable routes to design and stabilize transient superconducting states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06939 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 2 Light ∣〈 Xi Xi+1 〉 c ∣ time 0 0 E KF k -π 2 π 2 a) d) b) c) FIG. 1. Light-enhanced long-range electronic correlations. Schematic illustration showing the effect of an impulsive optical pulse that excites IR-active phonons in a half-filled metal at initial time (panel a). This excitation dynamically induces enhanced long-range correlations at later times (panels b and c), even when the driving is insufficient to ge… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Panel a): The electron-phonon state (see Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dynamics of the momentum-resolved charge correlations for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Convergence analysis of the charge correlation function at momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Finite-size analysis of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of momentum-resolved pairing correlations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of momentum-resolved spin correlations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Panel a): Time evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Connected phonon–displacement correlator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The zero phonon frequency limit. We show the dynamics of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. We compare the exact dynamics of the double occupancy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. We compare the exact dynamics of the momentum-resolved charge cor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. We compare the exact dynamics of the momentum-resolved spin cor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2 Ck(t) a) 0 5 10time t [ 1 J ] 0. 0

  2. [2]

    2 b) 0 5 10time t [ 1 J ] 0. 0

  3. [3]

    2 c) 0 5 10 time t [1 J ]

  4. [4]

    3 Cπ (t) d) α = √ 2 α = √ 3 α = √ 4 0 5 10 time t [1 J ]

  5. [5]

    50 P0(t) e) 0 5 10 time t [1 J ]

  6. [6]

    0 Sπ (t) f) FIG. 3. Phenomenology of light-enhanced long-range electronic cor relation. In the upper row, we examine the dynamics of the momentum-resolved charge correlation Ck(t) as the phonon frequency decreases (from panel a to panel c), with parameters ω = (π/2)J, ( π/5)J, and ( π/10)J in panels a, b, and c, respectively, and corresponding coupling s ...

  7. [7]

    The figure shows the time evolution of momentum-resolved charge ( Ck(t)), pairing ( Pk(t)), and spin ( Sk(t)) corre- lations, characterizing the non-equilibrium electronic dy- namics following an impulsive delta-function in time ex- citation that promptly and uniformly excites the lattice. Charge correlations at momentum π exhibit rapid ini- tial enhanceme...

  8. [8]

    06 P(Nph) a) ω = π/ 10 J ω = π/ 2 J 50 100Nph 0 1 2 k/π − 1. 5 − 0. 5

Show all 108 references
  1. [9]

    5 C k(tJ = 10) b) 50 100Nph 0 1 2 k/π

  2. [10]

    2 C k(tJ = 10) c) FIG. 5. Long-time global phonon distribution for slow versus fast p honons. Panel a shows the distribution function P(Nph) of total phonon quanta excited across the entire system Nph at late times ( tJ = 10). We find that P(Nph) is substantially narrower for l...

  3. [11]

    Mitrano, A

    M. Mitrano, A. Cantaluppi, D. Nicoletti, S. Kaiser, A. Perucchi, S. Lupi, P. Di Pietro, D. Pontiroli, M. Ricc` o, S. R. Clark, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Possible light- induced superconductivity in K 3C60 at high temperature, Nature 530, 461 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Kogar, A

    A. Kogar, A. Zong, P. E. Dolgirev, X. Shen, J. Straqua- dine, Y.-Q. Bie, X. Wang, T. Rohwer, I.-C. Tung, Y. Yang, R. Li, J. Yang, S. Weathersby, S. Park, M. E. Kozina, E. J. Sie, H. Wen, P. Jarillo-Herrero, I. R. Fisher, X. Wang, and N. Gedik, Light-induced charge density wave...

    2020

  5. [13]

    Baldini, A

    E. Baldini, A. Zong, D. Choi, C. Lee, M. H. Michael, L. Windgaetter, I. I. Mazin, S. Latini, D. Azoury, B. Lv, A. Kogar, Y. Su, Y. Wang, Y. Lu, T. Takayama, H. Tak- agi, A. J. Millis, A. Rubio, E. Demler, and N. Gedik, The spontaneous symmetry breaking in Ta 2NiSe5 is struc- t...

    2023

  6. [14]

    Fausti, R

    D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe- ordered cuprate, Science 331, 189 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    B. Liu, M. F¨ orst, M. Fechner, D. Nicoletti, J. Porras, T. Loew, B. Keimer, and A. Cavalleri, Pump frequency resonances for light-induced incipient superconductivity in YBa 2Cu3O6.5, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011053 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Budden, T

    M. Budden, T. Gebert, M. Buzzi, G. Jotzu, E. Wang, T. Matsuyama, G. Meier, Y. Laplace, D. Pontiroli, M. Ricc` o, F. Schlawin, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Evi- dence for metastable photo-induced superconductivity in K3C60, Nat. Phys. 17, 611 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Buzzi, D

    M. Buzzi, D. Nicoletti, M. Fechner, N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. A. Sentef, A. Georges, T. Biesner, E. Uykur, M. Dres- sel, A. Henderson, T. Siegrist, J. A. Schlueter, K. Miya- gawa, K. Kanoda, M.-S. Nam, A. Ardavan, J. Coulthard, J. Tindall, F. Schlawin, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri...

    2020

  10. [18]

    M. Knap, M. Babadi, G. Refael, I. Martin, and E. Dem- ler, Dynamical cooper pairing in nonequilibrium electron- phonon systems, Phys. Rev. B 94, 214504 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    D. M. Kennes, E. Y. Wilner, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Transient superconductivity from electronic squeezing of optically pumped phonons, Nat. Phys. 13, 479 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    A. Nava, C. Giannetti, A. Georges, E. Tosatti, and M. Fabrizio, Cooling quasiparticles in A 3C60 fullerides by excitonic mid-infrared absorption, Nat. Phys. 14, 154 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    M. A. Sentef, A. Tokuno, A. Georges, and C. Kollath, Theory of laser-controlled competing superconducting and charge orders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 087002 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Chiriac` o, A

    G. Chiriac` o, A. J. Millis, and I. L. Aleiner, Transient superconductivity without superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 98, 220510 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Dai and P

    Z. Dai and P. A. Lee, Superconductinglike response in a driven gapped bosonic system, Phys. Rev. B 104, 054512 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    M. A. Sentef, A. F. Kemper, A. Georges, and C. Kollath, Theory of light-enhanced phonon-mediated superconduc- tivity, Phys. Rev. B 93, 144506 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Babadi, M

    M. Babadi, M. Knap, I. Martin, G. Refael, and E. Dem- ler, Theory of parametrically amplified electron-phonon superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 96, 014512 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    J. R. Coulthard, S. R. Clark, S. Al-Assam, A. Cavalleri, and D. Jaksch, Enhancement of superexchange pairing in the periodically driven Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 96, 085104 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Murakami, N

    Y. Murakami, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium steady states and transient dynamics of conventional superconductors under phonon driving, Phys. Rev. B 96, 045125 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    M. A. Sentef, Light-enhanced electron-phonon coupling from nonlinear electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. B 95, 205111 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    C. J. Eckhardt, S. Chattopadhyay, D. M. Kennes, E. A. Demler, M. A. Sentef, and M. H. Michael, Theory of res- onantly enhanced photo-induced superconductivity, Nat. Commun. 15, 2300 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Chattopadhyay, C

    S. Chattopadhyay, C. J. Eckhardt, D. M. Kennes, M. A. Sentef, D. Shin, A. Rubio, A. Cavalleri, E. A. Dem- ler, and M. H. Michael, Metastable photo-induced su- perconductivity far above Tc, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 34 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    J. Sous, B. Kloss, D. M. Kennes, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Phonon-induced disorder in dynamics of op- tically pumped metals from nonlinear electron-phonon coupling, Nat. Commun. 12, 5803 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    W. Hu, S. Kaiser, D. Nicoletti, C. R. Hunt, I. Gierz, M. C. Hoffmann, M. Le Tacon, T. Loew, B. Keimer, and A. Cavalleri, Optically enhanced coherent transport in YBa 2Cu3O6.5 by ultrafast redistribution of interlayer coupling, Nat. Mater. 13, 705 (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    Kaiser, C

    S. Kaiser, C. R. Hunt, D. Nicoletti, W. Hu, I. Gierz, 9 H. Y. Liu, M. Le Tacon, T. Loew, D. Haug, B. Keimer, and A. Cavalleri, Optically induced coherent transport far above Tc in underdoped YBa 2Cu3O6+δ, Phys. Rev. B 89, 184516 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Buzzi, D

    M. Buzzi, D. Nicoletti, M. Fechner, N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. A. Sentef, and A. Cavalleri, Photomolecular high- temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031028 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    K¨ ohler, J

    T. K¨ ohler, J. Stolpp, and S. Paeckel, Efficient and flex- ible approach to simulate low-dimensional quantum lat- tice models with large local Hilbert spaces, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Huscroft and R

    C. Huscroft and R. T. Scalettar, Effect of disorder on charge-density wave and superconducting order in the half-filled attractive Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 55, 1185 (1997)

    1997

  29. [37]

    Assmann, S

    E. Assmann, S. Chiesa, G. G. Batrouni, H. G. Evertz, and R. T. Scalettar, Superconductivity and charge or- der of confined Fermi systems, Phys. Rev. B 85, 014509 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    Moroder, M

    M. Moroder, M. Mitrano, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. Paeckel, and J. Sous, Phonon state tomography of electron correlation dynamics in optically excited solids, Nano Lett. 24, 15693 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Smith, J

    A. Smith, J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, and R. Moessner, Disorder-free localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 266601 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Smith, J

    A. Smith, J. Knolle, R. Moessner, and D. L. Kovrizhin, Absence of ergodicity without quenched disorder: From quantum disentangled liquids to many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 176601 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    J. C. Halimeh, L. Homeier, H. Zhao, A. Bohrdt, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and J. Knolle, Enhancing disorder- free localization through dynamically emergent local symmetries, PRX Quantum 3, 020345 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    F. L. Buessen, H.-Y. Lee, T. Grover, and Y. B. Kim, Prethermalization via self driving and external driving of extensive subsystems, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174417 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    F¨ orst, C

    M. F¨ orst, C. Manzoni, S. Kaiser, Y. Tomioka, Y. Tokura, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, Nonlinear phononics as an ultrafast route to lattice control, Nat. Phys. 7, 854 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    Mankowsky, A

    R. Mankowsky, A. Subedi, M. F¨ orst, S. O. Mariager, M. Chollet, H. T. Lemke, J. S. Robinson, J. M. Glow- nia, M. P. Minitti, A. Frano, M. Fechner, N. A. Spaldin, T. Loew, B. Keimer, A. Georges, and A. Cavalleri, Non- linear lattice dynamics as a basis for enhanced supercon- d...

    2014

  37. [45]

    Mankowsky, M

    R. Mankowsky, M. F¨ orst, T. Loew, J. Porras, B. Keimer, and A. Cavalleri, Coherent modulation of the YBa2Cu3O6+x atomic structure by displacive stimulated ionic Raman scattering, Phys. Rev. B 91, 094308 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    E. Rowe, B. Yuan, M. Buzzi, G. Jotzu, Y. Zhu, M. Fech- ner, M. F¨ orst, B. Liu, D. Pontiroli, M. Ricc` o, and A. Cav- alleri, Resonant enhancement of photo-induced supercon- ductivity in K 3C60, Nat. Phys. 19, 1821 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Kaneko, T

    T. Kaneko, T. Shirakawa, S. Sorella, and S. Yunoki, Pho- toinduced η Pairing in the Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 077002 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    J. Li, D. Golez, P. Werner, and M. Eckstein, η-paired superconducting hidden phase in photodoped Mott insu- lators, Phys. Rev. B 102, 165136 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Peronaci, O

    F. Peronaci, O. Parcollet, and M. Schir´ o, Enhancement of local pairing correlations in periodically driven Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 101, 161101 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Murakami, D

    Y. Murakami, D. Goleˇ z, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Photo-induced nonequilibrium states in Mott insulators (2023), arXiv:2310.05201

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Z. Chen, Y. Wang, S. N. Rebec, T. Jia, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, B. Moritz, R. G. Moore, T. P. Devereaux, and Z.- X. Shen, Anomalously strong near-neighbor attraction in doped 1D cuprate chains, Science 373, 1235 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    J. Li, D. Jost, T. Tang, R. Wang, Y. Zhong, Z. Chen, M. Garcia-Fernandez, J. Pelliciari, V. Bisogni, B. Moritz, K. Zhou, Y. Wang, T. P. Devereaux, W.-S. Lee, and Z.- X. Shen, Doping dependence of 2-spinon excitations in the doped 1D cuprate Ba 2CuO3+δ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 14...

    2025

  45. [53]

    Padma, J

    H. Padma, J. Thomas, S. F. R. TenHuisen, W. He, Z. Guan, J. Li, B. Lee, Y. Wang, S. H. Lee, Z. Mao, H. Jang, V. Bisogni, J. Pelliciari, M. P. M. Dean, S. John- ston, and M. Mitrano, Beyond-Hubbard pairing in a cuprate ladder, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021049 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Padma, F

    H. Padma, F. Glerean, S. F. TenHuisen, Z. Shen, H. Wang, L. Xu, J. D. Elliott, C. C. Homes, E. Sko- ropata, H. Ueda, et al. , Symmetry-protected electronic metastability in an optically driven cuprate ladder, Nat. Mater. 10.1038/s41563-025-02254-2 (2025)

    2025 doi

  47. [55]

    V. K. Thorsmølle, C. C. Homes, A. Gozar, G. Blumberg, J. L. M. van Mechelen, A. B. Kuzmenko, S. Vanishri, C. Marin, and H. M. Rønnow, Phonon energy gaps in the charged incommensurate planes of the spin-ladder Sr14Cu24O41 compound by Raman and infrared spec- troscopy, Phys. Rev...

    2012

  48. [56]

    Paeckel, B

    S. Paeckel, B. Fauseweh, A. Osterkorn, T. K¨ ohler, D. Manske, and S. R. Manmana, Detecting supercon- ductivity out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B 101, 180507 (2020)

    2020

  49. [58]

    J. O. Tollerud, G. Sparapassi, A. Montanaro, S. As- ban, F. Glerean, F. Giusti, A. Marciniak, G. Kourousias, F. Bill` e, F. Cilento, S. Mukamel, and D. Fausti, Fem- tosecond covariance spectroscopy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 5383 (2019)

    2019

  50. [59]

    Glerean, G

    F. Glerean, G. Jarc, A. Marciniak, F. Giusti, G. Spara- passi, A. Montanaro, E. M. Rigoni, J. O. Tollerud, and D. Fausti, Time-resolved multimode heterodyne detec- tion for dissecting coherent states of matter, Opt. Lett. 45, 3498 (2020)

    2020

  51. [60]

    Glerean, E

    F. Glerean, E. M. Rigoni, G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, M. Mitrano, F. Benatti, and D. Fausti, Ultrafast pump-probe phase-randomized to- mography, Light Sci. Appl. 14, 115 (2025)

    2025

  52. [61]

    π pulse

    J. Cao, C. J. Bardeen, and K. R. Wilson, Molecular “ π pulse” for total inversion of electronic state population, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1406 (1998)

    1998

  53. [62]

    D. D. Dlott and M. D. Fayer, Shocked molecular solids: Vibrational up pumping, defect hot spot formation, and the onset of chemistry, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 3798 (1990)

    1990

  54. [64]

    Hubig, F

    C. Hubig, F. Lachenmaier, N.-O. Linden, T. Reinhard, L. Stenzel, A. Swoboda, M. Grundner, S. Mardazad, S. Paeckel, and F. Pauw, The SyTen toolkit

  55. [65]

    Ultrafast electronic coherence from slow phonons

    C. Hubig, Symmetry-Protected Tensor Networks , Ph.D. 10 thesis, LMU M¨ unchen (2017). Methods We evolve the initial metallic state in time under the full Hamiltonian, Eq. ( 1), following an impulsive ex- citation of its phonons, using large-scale MPS simula- tions. Separately,...

    2017

  56. [66]

    To mitigate the projection error [ 5], which is particularly severe for product states such as Eq

    (which is represented as a matrix-product operator (MPO) [ 3]) is computed using the time-dependent variational principle ( TDVP) [ 4] for MPS’s [ 5]. To mitigate the projection error [ 5], which is particularly severe for product states such as Eq. ( 1), we compute the first f...

    2000

  57. [67]

    2 Ck(t) L = 20 L = 32 time t [1 J ] 0 5 10 k/π0. 0 0. 5 1. 0

  58. [70]

    2 Ck(t) time t [1 J ] 0 5 10 k/π0. 0

  59. [71]

    2 time t [1 J ] 0 5 10 k/π0. 0

  60. [72]

    2 FIG. 2. Dynamics of the momentum-resolved charge correlations for L = 20 sites (upper row) and L = 32 sites (lower row). Here, we show the Fourier transform F of the charge correlation function, Ck(t) ≡ F [⟨Ψ(t)| ˆniˆni+r |Ψ(t)⟩ − ⟨Ψ(t)| ˆni |Ψ(t)⟩ ⟨Ψ(t)| ˆni+r |Ψ(t)⟩] for a...

  61. [73]

    4 2500 (see Figure 3)

    We set dmax ν = 40 and χmax = 2000 in these simulations. 4 2500 (see Figure 3). The results confirm full convergence for both system sizes at low and intermediate phonon frequencies (blue and green lines) and show that late-time data at high phonon frequencies (red lines) differ...

    2000

  62. [74]

    3 Cπ(t) L = 20 ω = π/ 10 ω = π/ 5 ω = π/ 2 0 5 10 time t [ 1 J ]

  63. [75]

    3 L = 32 χ max = 1500 χ max = 2000 χ max = 2500 FIG. 3. Convergence analysis of the charge correlation function at momentum k = π with respect to the maximum allowed bond dimension χmax for different phonon frequencies and system size L = 20 (left panel) and L = 32 (right panel...

    2000

  64. [76]

    All quantities are in units of the hopping J. 7 k/π

  65. [78]

    4 Pk(t) exact effective k/π

  66. [83]

    0time t [1 J ] 0 5 10

  67. [84]

    4 FIG. 5. Comparison of momentum-resolved pairing correlations Pk(t) ≡ F [ ⟨Ψ(t)|ˆc† i↑ˆc† i↓ˆci+r↓ˆci+r↑|Ψ(t)⟩ ] for the exact dynamics (top row) and the effective model (bottom row), where F denotes the Fourier transform. Following Figure 2, we examine three phonon frequencie...

    2000

  68. [86]

    0 Sk(t) exact effective k/π0. 0

  69. [88]

    0 time t [1 J ] 0510

    51. 0 time t [1 J ] 0510

  70. [91]

    0 time t [1 J ] 0510

  71. [92]

    0 FIG. 6. Comparison of momentum-resolved spin correlations Sk(t) ≡ F [ ⟨Ψ(t)|(ˆni↑ − ˆni↓)(ˆni+r↑ − ˆni+r↓)|Ψ(t)⟩ ] for the exact dynamics (upper row) and the effective model (lower r ow), where F denotes the Fourier transform. We examine three phonon frequencies —fast ( ω = π...

    2000

  72. [93]

    3 Cπ(t) a) ω = π/ 2 exact ω = π/ 10 exact ω = π/ 2 PST ω = π/ 10 PST 50 100 Nph

  73. [94]

    06 P(Nph) b) ω = π/ 2 J ω = π/ 10 J FIG. 7. Panel a): Time evolution of the k = π charge correlator, comparing PST estimates (symbols) with the exact results (solid curves). Panel b): Global p honon-number distribution P(Nph) obtained from the same PST sampling procedure. We e...

    2000

  74. [95]

    Here, the phonon frequency ω = π/10 J, gq = 0 .07 J, α = √ 2, with chain length L = 20, maximum bond dimension χmax = 2000, and phonon cutoff dmax ν = 40

    Nearest neighbors exhibit anticorrelations, while next-nearest ne ighbors show positive correlations. Here, the phonon frequency ω = π/10 J, gq = 0 .07 J, α = √ 2, with chain length L = 20, maximum bond dimension χmax = 2000, and phonon cutoff dmax ν = 40. Enhanced coherence fr...

    2000

  75. [96]

    15 Cπ(t) exact effective a FIG. 9. The zero phonon frequency limit. We show the dynamics of the charge correlation function at momentum k = π for the exact model (solid line) and the effective model (dashed lin e). We set L = 20, gq = 0 .1 J, α = √ 2, χmax = 2000, and dmax ν = 4...

    2000

  76. [97]

    265 D(t) a) ω = π/ 10, instantaneous 0 5 10

  77. [98]

    260 ¯D(t) b) ω = π/ 10, cumulative exact effective effective, Ueff = 0 effective, ϵeff = 0 0 5 10 time t [1 J ]

  78. [99]

    30 D(t) c) ω = π/ 2, instantaneous 0 5 10 time t [1 J ]

  79. [100]

    325 ¯D(t) d) ω = π/ 2, cumulative FIG. 10. We compare the exact dynamics of the double occupancy D(t) ≡ 1 L ∑ i⟨Ψ(t)|ˆni↑ˆni↓|Ψ(t)⟩ generated by Eq. ( 2) (solid) with those from (i) the full effective Hamiltonian Eq. ( 4) (dashed), (ii) the effective Hamiltonian without interact...

    2000

  80. [101]

    15 Cπ a) ω = π/ 10, instantaneous 0 5 10

  81. [102]

    10 ¯Cπ b) ω = π/ 10, cumulative 0 5 10 time t [1 J ]

  82. [103]

    4 Cπ c) ω = π/ 2, instantaneous 0 5 10 time t [1 J ]

  83. [104]

    2 ¯Cπ d) ω = π/ 2, cumulative exact effective effective, Ueff = 0 effective, ϵeff = 0 FIG. 11. We compare the exact dynamics of the momentum-resolved charge cor relator Ck(t) at k = π generated by Eq. ( 2) (solid) with those from (i) the full effective Hamiltonian Eq. ( 4) (dashed),...

    2000

  84. [105]

    0 Sπ(t) a) ω = π/ 10, instantaneous 0 5 10

  85. [106]

    00 ¯Sπ(t) b) ω = π/ 10, cumulative exact effective effective, Ueff = 0 effective, ϵeff = 0 0 5 10 time t [1 J ]

  86. [107]

    0 Sπ(t) c) ω = π/ 2, instantaneous 0 5 10 time t [1 J ]

  87. [108]

    0 ¯Sπ(t) d) ω = π/ 2, cumulative FIG. 12. We compare the exact dynamics of the momentum-resolved spin cor relator Sk(t) at k = π (solid) with those from (i) the full effective Hamiltonian Eq. ( 4) (dashed), (ii) the effective Hamiltonian without interactions ( Ueff = 0, dotted), ...

    2000

  88. [109]

    K¨ ohler, J

    T. K¨ ohler, J. Stolpp, and S. Paeckel, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021)

    2021

  89. [110]

    Schollw¨ ock,Ann

    U. Schollw¨ ock,Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  90. [111]

    Hubig, I

    C. Hubig, I. P. McCulloch, and U. Schollw¨ ock, Phys. Rev. B 95, 035129 (2017)

    2017

  91. [112]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇ zorn, H. Verschelde, an d F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011)

    2011

  92. [113]

    Paeckel, T

    S. Paeckel, T. K¨ ohler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Schollw¨ ock, and C. Hubig, Annals of Physics 411, 167998 (2019)

    2019

  93. [114]

    Time dependent variational principle wit h ancillary Krylov sub- space,

    M. Yang and S. R. White, “Time dependent variational principle wit h ancillary Krylov sub- space,” (2020), arXiv:2005.06104

    2020 arXiv

  94. [115]

    Coop er-paired bipolaronic superconductors,

    M. Grundner, T. Blatz, J. Sous, U. Schollw¨ ock, and S. Paeckel, “Coop er-paired bipolaronic superconductors,” (2023), arXiv:2308.13427

    2023 arXiv

  95. [116]

    The SyTen toolkit,

    C. Hubig, F. Lachenmaier, N.-O. Linden, T. Reinhard, L. Stenzel, A. Sw oboda, M. Grundner, S. Mardazad, S. Paeckel, and F. Pauw, “The SyTen toolkit,”

  96. [117]

    Hubig, Symmetry-Protected Tensor Networks, Ph.D

    C. Hubig, Symmetry-Protected Tensor Networks, Ph.D. thesis , LMU M¨ unchen (2017)

    2017

  97. [118]

    D. M. Kennes, E. Y. Wilner, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Nat. Phys. 13, 479 (2017)

    2017

  98. [119]

    J. Sous, B. Kloss, D. M. Kennes, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Nat. Commun. 12, 5803 (2021)

    2021

  99. [120]

    Moroder, M

    M. Moroder, M. Mitrano, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. Paeckel, and J. Sous, Nano Lett. 24, 15693 (2024)

    2024

  100. [121]

    A. J. Ferris and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012). 17

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.