Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 111 references

Magnetic fields inside white dwarfs enable resonant axion and dark photon emission in regions where unmagnetized plasma would forbid it.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-04 22:51 UTC pith:X2W4FYZO

load-bearing objection Magnetized-plasma resonance criteria are the real result, and they check out; the astrophysical payoff hinges on an unverified interior B-field the authors honestly flag as illustrative. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2509.07085 v1 pith:X2W4FYZO submitted 2025-09-08 hep-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

Resonant axion and dark photon production in magnetic white dwarfs

Nirmalya Brahma , Ella Iles , Hugo Sch\'erer , Katelin Schutz This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords axionsdark photonsmagnetic white dwarfsresonant productionplasma dispersion relationsstellar energy losscyclotron resonanceaxion-like particles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Resonant production of axions and dark photons in stellar plasmas is usually thought to require a level crossing between the Standard Model photon and the new particle under unmagnetized dispersion relations, for example the plasma frequency matching the boson mass. This paper argues that in magnetic white dwarfs the magnetic field changes the photon's in-medium dispersion so deeply that resonance can occur in large additional volumes, including outer layers where it was kinematically forbidden and for boson masses exceeding the maximum plasma frequency. Using the magnetized photon self-energy, the authors derive the new resonance criteria and compute axion and dark-photon emissivities for representative magnetic white dwarf models, finding luminosities that can rival neutrino and photon cooling in unconstrained parameter space. The practical consequence is that existing stellar bounds on light bosons must be reassessed wherever the cyclotron frequency is comparable to or larger than the plasma frequency.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a magnetic field qualitatively changes where resonant conversion of photons to axions and dark photons can occur in a stellar plasma. In an unmagnetized plasma the transverse photon modes have an effective mass equal to the plasma frequency, so resonance occurs only at the spherical shell where ω_p = m_X; the longitudinal mode resonates at ω = ω_p. In a magnetized plasma the transverse and longitudinal degrees of freedom mix, producing three distinct normal modes with dispersion relations set by form factors π⊥, π×, and π∥. Solving the level-crossing condition m_X^2 = π_I gives resonant frequencies that are shifted and broadened relative to the unmagnetized

What carries the argument

The plasma mixing matrix π_IJ, the projection of the retarded photon self-energy onto photon polarization vectors, is the central object. In a magnetized plasma this matrix is non-diagonal, and diagonalizing it yields three normal modes with distinct dispersion relations. Solving the resonance condition m_X^2 = π_I, where I labels the normal mode, locates the level crossing that controls resonant axion and dark photon emission; the resonance frequency is fixed by the magnetic field strength, plasma frequency, and propagation angle.

Load-bearing premise

The effect requires that magnetic white dwarfs actually hold magnetic fields whose electron cyclotron frequency is at least comparable to the plasma frequency, roughly 10^10 to 10^12 G, throughout substantial volumes; the paper adopts a uniform interior field purely for illustration, so if real interior fields are much weaker or differently distributed, the newly opened resonance regions vanish.

What would settle it

A direct test would be an asteroseismic or spectropolarimetric reconstruction of a magnetic white dwarf's interior field: if no region satisfies ω_B ≳ ω_p, the predicted magnetized-resonance emissivity is absent and the corresponding cooling signature should not appear. Alternatively, a targeted search for the predicted directional X-ray re-conversion signal from a known magnetic white dwarf, with luminosity and angular pattern matching the magnetized-resonance calculation, would settle whether the effect operates.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Stellar energy-loss bounds on axions and dark photons must be recomputed for environments with ω_B ≳ ω_p, since resonant emission is nonzero in regions previously excluded by isotropic-plasma kinematics.
  • Resonant conversion can dominate axion production in magnetic white dwarfs, exceeding Primakoff, coalescence, and bremsstrahlung over much of the mass and coupling space considered.
  • Dark luminosity from this channel can be comparable to photon surface cooling or neutrino plasmon cooling, making white dwarf cooling observables sensitive probes of the new resonance.
  • The emissivity is strongly direction-dependent, so conversion signals outside the star, such as X-ray re-conversion, carry information about the internal magnetic field geometry.
  • Boson masses larger than the maximum plasma frequency become kinematically accessible, which was impossible in an unmagnetized plasma.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If realistic internal magnetic fields are stronger near the core than at the surface, as several models suggest, the effect may be larger than the uniform-field estimates, potentially producing stronger constraints on light bosons or, if absent, bounding internal field strengths.
  • The same kinematic machinery applies to other light bosons such as B−L gauge bosons and scalars coupling to leptons, and to other magnetized environments such as neutron stars, so the resonance broadening is plausibly a general feature of any plasma with ω_B ≳ ω_p.
  • The anisotropy prediction offers a concrete test: if axions or dark photons are produced resonantly, the angular pattern of re-converted photons in a stellar magnetosphere or a detector should reflect the internal field orientation, and null observations could exclude this interpretation.
  • Comparing the cooling rates of magnetic white dwarfs with measured strong surface fields against those with weak fields could empirically test whether the added emissivity tracks internal field strength.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies how strong magnetic fields modify the in-medium photon dispersion relations and thereby alter the resonant production of axions and dark photons in stellar plasmas, using magnetic white dwarfs as a case study. It imports the magnetized-plasma self-energy of Ref. [60], diagonalizes the plasma mixing matrix to obtain three normal modes, and derives explicit resonance criteria for propagation parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field (Eqs. 18-19 and 25-26). For arbitrary propagation directions, eigenvalues are obtained via Cardano's method and emissivities are computed with Eq. (13). Using MESA-inspired 0.5 and 1.3 solar-mass MWD profiles and an assumed uniform internal field with cyclotron frequency 6 keV, the paper finds that magnetic fields open new resonant regions, producing emissivities that can be comparable to standard photon and neutrino cooling in interesting but unconstrained parts of parameter space.

Significance. If the central dispersion-algebraic result is reliable, the paper demonstrates a qualitatively new kinematic effect: strong magnetic fields broaden and shift the level-crossing conditions for axion and dark photon emission, so resonances can occur in stellar regions where the isotropic-plasma treatment forbids them. The paper has clear strengths: the resonance criteria are explicitly derived, the parallel and perpendicular cases are checked analytically, the isotropic limit is recovered, and the luminosity contours in Fig. 9 are honestly labeled as illustrative rather than as bounds. The principal application to MWDs, however, depends on an assumed internal field strength that is observationally uncertain, and this limitation is acknowledged in the text. The derivation itself is internally consistent and motivates future work with realistic magnetic-field profiles and self-consistent stellar simulations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III; Figs. 5-9] The abstract and introduction state that resonant production can be enabled 'in large volumes of MWDs.' This conclusion rests on the assumed uniform internal field with omega_B = 6 keV (B ~ 5e11 G). Section III notes that observed surface fields only reach about 1e9 G and that internal fields are model-dependent, with predictions spanning from about 100 times the surface value to theoretical upper bounds. If the interior field is closer to the observed surface value, then omega_B << omega_p and the new resonance regions opened by Eqs. (18)-(19) and (25)-(26) largely disappear. Since this is the decisive environmental input, please quantify the volume fraction and dark luminosity as functions of the internal field strength (or for a range of plausible profiles), and temper the abstract so that the claim is stated as conditional on the assumed strong internal field.
  2. [Sec. II.A, Eqs. (6)-(7)] The form factors used in the paper are taken from Ref. [60] in the long-wavelength limit omega >> v k. The paper does not explicitly validate this condition for the degenerate MWD electrons at the resonant frequencies and momenta used in the numerical results, e.g. for m_X = 7 keV and omega_B = 6 keV in Fig. 6. Since the resonance criteria (18)-(19) and (25)-(26) follow directly from these form factors, a check of omega >> v_F k across the resonant shells (including the high-density 1.3 M_sun model) should be shown. If the long-wavelength approximation is marginal in some regions, the corresponding parts of the emissivity profiles would need to be identified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.B, text after Eq. (11)] The statement that the weak-damping limit has been 'explicitly checked' is not supported by a quantitative criterion. Please give the condition used and a representative value of Gamma_I / omega in the MWD plasma.
  2. [Sec. II.A, Eq. (6)] The definitions of mu_m and omega_m are given in the text, but they appear only after the equation. Consider defining them immediately before or in the equation display to improve readability.
  3. [Figs. 5-7] The captions would be easier to read if the curves and shaded regions were identified with the same labels as in the text. In particular, the dashed and dotted-line conventions in the figures could be explicitly stated in each caption rather than only in the body text.
  4. [Sec. IV, Fig. 8] For the axion comparison, the text mentions that resonant conversion can dominate over bremsstrahlung and Primakoff emission, but it does not clearly distinguish which curves are newly computed with the magnetized dispersion and which reproduce earlier isotropic-resonance results. A short statement in the figure caption would remove ambiguity.
  5. [Sec. V] The discussion of backreactions is appropriate, but it would be helpful to state explicitly that the luminosity contours in Fig. 9 are computed from static profiles and therefore should not be interpreted as predictions for the final stellar structure in the presence of the BSM energy loss.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the magnetized-plasma form factors are imported from same-authors Ref. [60], but they are parameter-free, assumption-stated, and benchmarked against classical kinetic theory; the new resonance regions follow algebraically.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is: take the retarded photon self-energy from Ref. [60] (Brahma & Schutz, same group), approximate the degenerate-plasma form factors in Eqs. (6)-(7), diagonalize the plasma mixing matrix Eq. (5), impose the level-crossing condition m_X^2 = pi_I, and obtain the resonance criteria (18)-(19) and (25)-(26). The load-bearing self-citation to Ref. [60] is not circular: that paper is described as a first-principles finite-temperature field-theory computation in a stated limit ('computed in a magnetized background using the real-time formalism of thermal field theory in the long-wavelength limit'), and the low-frequency form factors are externally benchmarked against classical cold-plasma kinetic theory: 'the form factors share a similar functional form as the one derived using classical kinetic theory in a cold, magnetized plasma'. The new resonance regions are algebraic consequences of these form factors and the resonance condition; they are not fitted to data and the paper does not rename an existing result. The luminosity contours in Fig. 9 are explicitly not constraints ('these contours do not constitute bounds'), so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction. The main soft spot, as the paper itself states, is the assumed uniform internal magnetic field: 'Given this uncertainty, we adopt a simplified model assuming a uniform magnetic field inside the MWD... purely for illustrative purposes'. That is an environmental assumption that affects the astrophysical reach, but it is not a circular derivation step. Overall, self-citation is present and load-bearing, but it carries independent support and does not force the conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation inherits the magnetized-plasma self-energy of Ref. [60] and assumes uniform internal B, MESA density/temperature profiles, weak damping, and electron-only response. No new particles or entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Internal magnetic field strength (ω_B or B) = scanned; fiducial ω_B = 6 keV, B ≈ 5.17×10^11 G
    Internal MWD field is observationally unconstrained; the paper adopts a uniform profile and varies its magnitude to illustrate the effect.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Retarded photon self-energy in magnetized plasma in the long-wavelength limit, taken from Ref. [60]
    Eqs. (5)-(6) import the form factors from Ref. [60]; the paper does not re-derive them and assumes the long-wavelength regime holds in the MWD plasma.
  • domain assumption Weak-damping limit Γ^I_γ ≪ π_I/ω, allowing the delta-function approximation in Eq. (11)
    The paper states this was checked, but the anti-Hermitian part is not computed in the text.
  • domain assumption MWD interior profiles (T(r), ω_p(r)) from MESA models Refs. [71,72] are representative
    Used to compute emissivities and luminosities; real MWDs may differ.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniform internal magnetic field with adjustable magnitude
    Adopted for simplicity; the authors explicitly state this is illustrative and realistic profiles are left to future work.
  • domain assumption Only electron contribution to the response tensor is relevant
    Ions have much lower plasma frequency; standard for WD cores.
  • standard math Standard thermal field theory identities (detailed balance, delta-function resonance)
    Used in Eqs. (8)-(13).

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resonant axion and dark photon production in magnetic white dwarfs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X2W4FYZO

@misc{pith2026250907085,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resonant axion and dark photon production in magnetic white dwarfs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X2W4FYZO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07085}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Using magnetic white dwarfs as a case study, we show that the emission of sub-MeV bosons from stellar plasmas can be substantially modified in the presence of a magnetic field. In particular, the magnetic field-induced anisotropy and cyclotron resonance both significantly affect the in-medium dispersion relations of the Standard Model photon. As a result, resonant level crossing between photons and other light bosons occurs under environmental conditions that differ from the resonance criteria in unmagnetized environments. We find that the magnetic field opens additional regions within magnetic white dwarfs where resonance can occur. These findings motivate revisiting astrophysical constraints on light bosons in systems where the cyclotron frequency is comparable to or larger than the plasma frequency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07085 by Ella Iles, Hugo Sch\'erer, Katelin Schutz, Nirmalya Brahma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A depiction of the polarization vectors Re[ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Resonant frequencies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Angular profile of the differential emissivity of 7 keV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature and plasma frequency profiles for re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Differential emissivities for 7 keV dark photons and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Axion emissivity via resonant conversion for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Contours of constant dark luminosity where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    can support resonant conversion into axions and dark photons, even whenω p < mX . This opens the possibility of resonant BSM particle produc- tion for values ofm X that are larger than the maximum plasma frequency, which would otherwise be impossible in the absence of a magnetic field. In Fig. 7, we show how varying the internal mag- 9 FIG. 6. Total emiss...

  2. [2]

    For axion production, emission via resonant conversion has been relatively overlooked compared to other pro- duction channels

    For large enough values of the cyclotron frequency, the resonant frequencies in the outermost re- gions of the star become highly Boltzmann-suppressed, quenching resonant conversion rates. For axion production, emission via resonant conversion has been relatively overlooked compared to other pro- duction channels. However, as discussed in Ref. [69] and sh...

  3. [3]

    cpconserva- tion in the presence of pseudoparticles,

    Roberto D Peccei and Helen R Quinn, “cpconserva- tion in the presence of pseudoparticles,” Physical Re- view Letters38, 1440 (1977)

    1977

  4. [4]

    A new light boson?

    Steven Weinberg, “A new light boson?” Physical Review Letters40, 223 (1978)

    1978

  5. [5]

    Problem of strongpandtinvariance in the presence of instantons,

    Frank Wilczek, “Problem of strongpandtinvariance in the presence of instantons,” Physical Review Letters 40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  6. [6]

    A cosmological bound on the invisible axion,

    Laurence F Abbott and P Sikivie, “A cosmological bound on the invisible axion,” Physics Letters B120, 133–136 (1983)

    1983

  7. [7]

    Cos- mology of the invisible axion,

    John Preskill, Mark B Wise, and Frank Wilczek, “Cos- mology of the invisible axion,” Physics Letters B120, 127–132 (1983)

    1983

  8. [8]

    The not-so-harmless axion,

    Michael Dine and Willy Fischler, “The not-so-harmless axion,” Physics Letters B120, 137–141 (1983)

    1983

  9. [9]

    Some properties ofo(32) super- strings,

    Edward Witten, “Some properties ofo(32) super- strings,” Physics Letters B149, 351–356 (1984)

    1984

  10. [10]

    Axions in string the- ory,

    Peter Svrcek and Edward Witten, “Axions in string the- ory,” Journal of High Energy Physics2006, 051 (2006)

    2006

  11. [11]

    String Axiverse,

    Asimina Arvanitaki, Savas Dimopoulos, Sergei Dubovsky, Nemanja Kaloper, and John March- Russell, “String Axiverse,” Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    An m theory solution to the strong cp- problem, and constraints on the axiverse,

    Bobby Samir Acharya, Konstantin Bobkov, and Piyush Kumar, “An m theory solution to the strong cp- problem, and constraints on the axiverse,” Journal of High Energy Physics2010, 105 (2010)

    2010

  13. [13]

    The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phe- 13 nomenology,

    Michele Cicoli, Mark Goodsell, and Andreas Ringwald, “The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phe- 13 nomenology,” JHEP10, 146 (2012), arXiv:1206.0819 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,

    Jihn E. Kim, “Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,” Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 103 (1979)

    1979

  15. [15]

    QCD and Resonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,

    Mikhail A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and Valentin I. Zakharov, “QCD and Resonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,” Nucl. Phys. B147, 385–447 (1979)

    1979

  16. [16]

    On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, “On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980)

    1980

  17. [17]

    A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harm- less Axion,

    Michael Dine, Willy Fischler, and Mark Srednicki, “A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harm- less Axion,” Phys. Lett. B104, 199–202 (1981)

    1981

  18. [18]

    Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,

    Bob Holdom, “Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,” Phys. Lett. B166, 196–198 (1986)

    1986

  19. [19]

    Kinetic Mixing of the Photon with Hidden U(1)s in String Phenomenology,

    S. A. Abel, M. D. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, V. V. Khoze, and A. Ringwald, “Kinetic Mixing of the Photon with Hidden U(1)s in String Phenomenology,” JHEP07, 124 (2008), arXiv:0803.1449 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Naturally Light Hidden Photons in LARGE Volume String Compactifications,

    Mark Goodsell, Joerg Jaeckel, Javier Redondo, and Andreas Ringwald, “Naturally Light Hidden Photons in LARGE Volume String Compactifications,” JHEP11, 027 (2009), arXiv:0909.0515 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    Secluded U(1) below the weak scale,

    Maxim Pospelov, “Secluded U(1) below the weak scale,” Phys. Rev. D80, 095002 (2009), arXiv:0811.1030 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    The Dark Photon,

    Marco Fabbrichesi, Emidio Gabrielli, and Gaia Lan- franchi, “The Dark Photon,” (2020), 10.1007/978-3- 030-62519-1, arXiv:2005.01515 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Interaction energy in electrody- namics and in the field theory of nuclear forces,

    E. C. G. Stueckelberg, “Interaction energy in electrody- namics and in the field theory of nuclear forces,” Helv. Phys. Acta11, 225–244 (1938)

    1938

  24. [24]

    Spectral Surgery in a Heat Bath: a finite-temperature guide to particle production for phenomenologists

    Nirmalya Brahma, Saniya Heeba, Hugo Sch´ erer, and Katelin Schutz, “Spectral Surgery in a Heat Bath: a finite-temperature guide to particle production for phe- nomenologists,” (2025), arXiv:2507.14277 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Limits on particles of small electric charge,

    S Davidson, B Campbell, and D Bailey, “Limits on particles of small electric charge,” Physical Review D 43, 2314 (1991)

    1991

  26. [26]

    Astrophys- ical bounds on millicharged particles in models with a paraphoton,

    Sacha Davidson and Michael E. Peskin, “Astrophys- ical bounds on millicharged particles in models with a paraphoton,” Phys. Rev. D49, 2114–2117 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9310288

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  27. [27]

    The cooling of hot white dwarfs: a theory with non-standard weak interactions, and a comparison with observations,

    Sergej I Blinnikov and NV Dunina-Barkovskaya, “The cooling of hot white dwarfs: a theory with non-standard weak interactions, and a comparison with observations,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society266, 289–304 (1994)

    1994

  28. [28]

    Updated bounds on millicharged particles,

    Sacha Davidson, Steen Hannestad, and Georg Raffelt, “Updated bounds on millicharged particles,” JHEP05, 003 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0001179

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    Dark Radia- tion constraints on minicharged particles in models with a hidden photon,

    Hendrik Vogel and Javier Redondo, “Dark Radia- tion constraints on minicharged particles in models with a hidden photon,” JCAP1402, 029 (2014), arXiv:1311.2600 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects,

    Edward Hardy and Robert Lasenby, “Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects,” JHEP02, 033 (2017), arXiv:1611.05852 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    New stellar constraints on dark photons,

    Haipeng An, Maxim Pospelov, and Josef Pradler, “New stellar constraints on dark photons,” Phys. Lett. B725, 190–195 (2013), arXiv:1302.3884 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    Solar neutrino limit on axions and keV-mass bosons,

    Paolo Gondolo and Georg G. Raffelt, “Solar neutrino limit on axions and keV-mass bosons,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 107301 (2009), arXiv:0807.2926 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    New axion and hidden photon constraints from a solar data global fit,

    N´ uria Vinyoles, Aldo Serenelli, Francesco L. Villante, Sarbani Basu, Javier Redondo, and Jordi Isern, “New axion and hidden photon constraints from a solar data global fit,” JCAP10, 015 (2015), arXiv:1501.01639 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Revisit- ing the bound on axion-photon coupling from Glob- ular Clusters,

    Adrian Ayala, Inma Dom ´ ınguez, Maurizio Giannotti, Alessandro Mirizzi, and Oscar Straniero, “Revisit- ing the bound on axion-photon coupling from Glob- ular Clusters,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 191302 (2014), arXiv:1406.6053 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  35. [35]

    Core mass at the helium flash from observations and a new bound on neutrino electromag- netic properties,

    Georg G Raffelt, “Core mass at the helium flash from observations and a new bound on neutrino electromag- netic properties,” The Astrophysical Journal365, 559– 568 (1990)

    1990

  36. [36]

    Stan- dard and nonstandard plasma neutrino emission revis- ited,

    Martin Haft, Georg Raffelt, and Achim Weiss, “Stan- dard and nonstandard plasma neutrino emission revis- ited,” Astrophys. J.425, 222–230 (1994), [Erratum: As- trophys.J. 438, 1017 (1995)], arXiv:astro-ph/9309014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  37. [37]

    Particle-physics constraints from the globular cluster M5: Neutrino Dipole Moments

    Nicol´ as Viaux, M´ arcio Catelan, Peter B. Stetson, Georg Raffelt, Javier Redondo, Aldo A. R. Valcarce, and Achim Weiss, “Particle-physics constraints from the globular cluster M5: Neutrino Dipole Moments,” As- tron. Astrophys.558, A12 (2013), arXiv:1308.4627 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  38. [38]

    Neutrino and axion bounds from the globular cluster M5 (NGC 5904),

    Nicol´ as Viaux, M´ arcio Catelan, Peter B. Stetson, Georg Raffelt, Javier Redondo, Aldo A. R. Valcarce, and Achim Weiss, “Neutrino and axion bounds from the globular cluster M5 (NGC 5904),” Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 231301 (2013), arXiv:1311.1669 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    Constraint on the magnetic dipole moment of neutri- nos by the tip-RGB luminosity inω-Centauri,

    S. Arceo-D ´ ıaz, K. P. Schr¨ oder, K. Zuber, and D. Jack, “Constraint on the magnetic dipole moment of neutri- nos by the tip-RGB luminosity inω-Centauri,” As- tropart. Phys.70, 1–11 (2015)

    2015

  40. [40]

    Revisiting the ax- ion bounds from the Galactic white dwarf luminosity function,

    Marcelo M. Miller Bertolami, Brenda E. Melendez, Le- andro G. Althaus, and Jordi Isern, “Revisiting the ax- ion bounds from the Galactic white dwarf luminosity function,” JCAP10, 069 (2014), arXiv:1406.7712 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    Axions and the cooling of white dwarf stars

    J. Isern, E. Garcia-Berro, S. Torres, and S. Catalan, “Axions and the cooling of white dwarf stars,” Astro- phys. J. Lett.682, L109 (2008), arXiv:0806.2807 [astro- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  42. [42]

    The rate of cooling of the pulsating white dwarf star G117−B15A: a new asteroseismological inference of the axion mass,

    Alejandro H. Corsico, Leandro G. Althaus, Marcelo M. Miller Bertolami, Alejandra D. Romero, Enrique Garcia-Berro, Jordi Isern, and S. O. Kepler, “The rate of cooling of the pulsating white dwarf star G117−B15A: a new asteroseismological inference of the axion mass,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.424, 2792 (2012), arXiv:1205.6180 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    New bounds on light millicharged particles from the tip of the red-giant branch,

    Audrey Fung, Saniya Heeba, Qinrui Liu, Varun Mu- ralidharan, Katelin Schutz, and Aaron C. Vincent, “New bounds on light millicharged particles from the tip of the red-giant branch,” Phys. Rev. D109, 083011 (2024), arXiv:2309.06465 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Advancing globular cluster con- straints on the axion-photon coupling,

    Matthew J. Dolan, Frederick J. Hiskens, and Ray- mond R. Volkas, “Advancing globular cluster con- straints on the axion-photon coupling,” JCAP10, 096 (2022), arXiv:2207.03102 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Constraining Dark Photons with Self-consistent Simulations of Globular Cluster Stars,

    Matthew J. Dolan, Frederick J. Hiskens, and Ray- mond R. Volkas, “Constraining Dark Photons with Self-consistent Simulations of Globular Cluster Stars,” (2023), arXiv:2306.13335 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    X-ray Signatures of Axion Conversion in Mag- 14 netic White Dwarf Stars,

    Christopher Dessert, Andrew J. Long, and Benjamin R. Safdi, “X-ray Signatures of Axion Conversion in Mag- 14 netic White Dwarf Stars,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 061104 (2019), arXiv:1903.05088 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    No Evidence for Axions from Chandra Observa- tion of the Magnetic White Dwarf RE J0317-853,

    Christopher Dessert, Andrew J. Long, and Benjamin R. Safdi, “No Evidence for Axions from Chandra Observa- tion of the Magnetic White Dwarf RE J0317-853,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 071102 (2022), arXiv:2104.12772 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Upper limit on the axion-photon coupling from magnetic white dwarf polarization,

    Christopher Dessert, David Dunsky, and Benjamin R. Safdi, “Upper limit on the axion-photon coupling from magnetic white dwarf polarization,” Phys. Rev. D105, 103034 (2022), arXiv:2203.04319 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Novel Constraints on Axions Produced in Pulsar Polar-Cap Cascades,

    Dion Noordhuis, Anirudh Prabhu, Samuel J. Witte, Alexander Y. Chen, F´ abio Cruz, and Christoph Weniger, “Novel Constraints on Axions Produced in Pulsar Polar-Cap Cascades,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 111004 (2023), arXiv:2209.09917 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Axion Clouds around Neu- tron Stars,

    Dion Noordhuis, Anirudh Prabhu, Christoph Weniger, and Samuel J. Witte, “Axion Clouds around Neu- tron Stars,” Phys. Rev. X14, 041015 (2024), arXiv:2307.11811 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Axion-mediated Transport of Fast Radio Bursts Originating in Inner Magnetospheres of Magnetars

    Anirudh Prabhu, “Axion-mediated Transport of Fast Radio Bursts Originating in Inner Magnetospheres of Magnetars,” Astrophys. J. Lett.946, L52 (2023), arXiv:2302.11645 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Photon self-energy at all temperatures and densities in all of phase space,

    Hugo Sch´ erer and Katelin Schutz, “Photon self-energy at all temperatures and densities in all of phase space,” JHEP11, 139 (2024), arXiv:2405.18466 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Faraday effect : a field theoretical point of view

    Avijit K. Ganguly, Sushan Konar, and Palash B. Pal, “Faraday effect: A Field theoretical point of view,” Phys. Rev. D60, 105014 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9905206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    Absorption of Electro-magnetic Waves in a Magnetized Medium

    Avijit K. Ganguly and Sushan Konar, “Absorption of electromagnetic waves in a magnetized medium,” Phys. Rev. D63, 065001 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0007027

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [55]

    Field theory of the photon selfenergy in a medium with a magnetic field and the Faraday effect,

    Juan Carlos D’Olivo, Jose F. Nieves, and Sarira Sahu, “Field theory of the photon selfenergy in a medium with a magnetic field and the Faraday effect,” Phys. Rev. D 67, 025018 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0208146

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  56. [56]

    Vacuum birefrin- gence in strong magnetic fields: (I) Photon polarization tensor with all the Landau levels,

    Koichi Hattori and Kazunori Itakura, “Vacuum birefrin- gence in strong magnetic fields: (I) Photon polarization tensor with all the Landau levels,” Annals Phys.330, 23–54 (2013), arXiv:1209.2663 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  57. [57]

    Vacuum birefringence in strong magnetic fields: (II) Complex refractive index from the lowest Landau level

    Koichi Hattori and Kazunori Itakura, “Vacuum birefrin- gence in strong magnetic fields: (II) Complex refractive index from the lowest Landau level,” Annals Phys.334, 58–82 (2013), arXiv:1212.1897 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    B-field induced mix- ing between Langmuir waves and axions,

    Luca Visinelli and Hugo Ter¸ cas, “B-field induced mix- ing between Langmuir waves and axions,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 096024 (2022), arXiv:1807.06828 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    In-medium polarization tensor in strong magnetic fields (I): Magneto-birefringence at finite temperature and density

    Koichi Hattori and Kazunori Itakura, “In-medium po- larization tensor in strong magnetic fields (I): Magneto- birefringence at finite temperature and density,” Annals Phys.446, 169114 (2022), arXiv:2205.04312 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Photon polarization tensor in a magnetized plasma: Absorptive part,

    Xinyang Wang and Igor Shovkovy, “Photon polarization tensor in a magnetized plasma: Absorptive part,” Phys. Rev. D104, 056017 (2021), arXiv:2103.01967 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Polarization ten- sor of magnetized quark-gluon plasma at nonzero baryon density,

    Xinyang Wang and Igor Shovkovy, “Polarization ten- sor of magnetized quark-gluon plasma at nonzero baryon density,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, 901 (2021), arXiv:2106.09029 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Photon conversion to axions and dark photons in magnetized plasmas: a finite-temperature field theory approach

    Nirmalya Brahma and Katelin Schutz, “Photon conver- sion to axions and dark photons in magnetized plasmas: a finite-temperature field theory approach,” JHEP12, 191 (2024), arXiv:2410.14771 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    The true incidence of magnetism among field white dwarfs,

    James Liebert, P. Bergeron, and J. B. Holberg, “The true incidence of magnetism among field white dwarfs,” The Astronomical Journal125, 348–353 (2003)

    2003

  64. [64]

    Magnetic white dwarf stars in the sloan digital sky survey,

    S. O. Kepler, I. Pelisoli, S. Jordan, S. J. Kleinman, D. Koester, B. K¨ ulebi, V. Pe¸ canha, B. G. Castanheira, A. Nitta, J. E. S. Costa, D. E. Winget, A. Kanaan, and L. Fraga, “Magnetic white dwarf stars in the sloan digital sky survey,” Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society429, 2934–2944 (2013)

    2013

  65. [65]

    Magnetic white dwarfs,

    Lilia Ferrario, Domitilla de Martino, and Boris T. G¨ ansicke, “Magnetic white dwarfs,” Space Science Re- views191, 111–169 (2015)

    2015

  66. [66]

    Magnetic fields in isolated and interact- ing white dwarfs,

    Lilia Ferrario, Dayal Wickramasinghe, and Adela Kawka, “Magnetic fields in isolated and interact- ing white dwarfs,” Advances in Space Research66, 1025–1056 (2020)

    2020

  67. [67]

    Catalog of magnetic white dwarfs with hydrogen dominated atmospheres,

    L. L. Amorim, S. O. Kepler, Baybars K¨ ulebi, S. Jor- dan, and A. D. Romero, “Catalog of magnetic white dwarfs with hydrogen dominated atmospheres,” The Astrophysical Journal944, 56 (2023)

    2023

  68. [68]

    The theory of plasma waves,

    Thomas Howard Stix, “The theory of plasma waves,” The theory of plasma waves (1962)

    1962

  69. [69]

    Donald B Melrose,Instabilities in space and laboratory plasmas(1986)

    1986

  70. [70]

    Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited,

    Javier Redondo and Georg Raffelt, “Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited,” JCAP08, 034 (2013), arXiv:1305.2920 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Revisiting longitudinal plasmon-axion con- version in external magnetic fields,

    Andrea Caputo, Alexander J. Millar, and Edoardo Vitagliano, “Revisiting longitudinal plasmon-axion con- version in external magnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. D101, 123004 (2020), arXiv:2005.00078 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    A rapidly conver- gent method for solving third-order polynomials,

    Ram´ on A Fern´ andez Molina, Leonardo Di G Sigalotti, Otto Rend´ on, and Antonio J Mejias, “A rapidly conver- gent method for solving third-order polynomials,” AIP Advances12(2022)

    2022

  73. [73]

    Magnetic field evolution for crystallization- driven dynamos in c/o white dwarfs,

    Matias Castro-Tapia, Shu Zhang, and Andrew Cum- ming, “Magnetic field evolution for crystallization- driven dynamos in c/o white dwarfs,” The Astrophysical Journal975, 63 (2024)

    2024

  74. [74]

    Three- component Phase Separation for Ultramassive White Dwarf Models,

    Matias Castro-Tapia and Andrew Cumming, “Three- component Phase Separation for Ultramassive White Dwarf Models,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.16529 (2025), arXiv:2506.16529 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Georg G Raffelt,Stars as laboratories for fundamen- tal physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles(University of Chicago press, 1996)

    1996

  76. [76]

    Axions and the white dwarf luminosity function

    J. Isern, S. Catalan, E. Garcia-Berro, and S. Torres, “Axions and the white dwarf luminosity function,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.172, 012005 (2009), arXiv:0812.3043 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  77. [77]

    Con- straining neutrino cooling using the hot white dwarf lu- minosity function in the globular cluster 47 tucanae,

    Brad MS Hansen, Harvey Richer, Jason Kalirai, Ryan Goldsbury, Shane Frewen, and Jeremy Heyl, “Con- straining neutrino cooling using the hot white dwarf lu- minosity function in the globular cluster 47 tucanae,” The Astrophysical Journal809, 141 (2015)

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    The rate of cooling of the pulsating white dwarf star g117- b15a: a new asteroseismological inference of the axion mass,

    Alejandro H Corsico, Leandro G Althaus, Marcelo Miguel Miller Bertolami, Alejandra D Romero, Enrique Garc ´ ıa-Berro, Jordi Isern, and Souza Oliveira Kepler, “The rate of cooling of the pulsating white dwarf star g117- b15a: a new asteroseismological inference of the axion mass,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society424, 2792–2799 (2012). 15

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    Constraining axion-like particles us- ing the white dwarf initial-final mass relation,

    Matthew J. Dolan, Frederick J. Hiskens, and Ray- mond R. Volkas, “Constraining axion-like particles us- ing the white dwarf initial-final mass relation,” JCAP 09, 010 (2021), arXiv:2102.00379 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA),

    B. Paxton, L. Bildsten, A. Dotter, F. Herwig, P. Lesaf- fre, and F. Timmes, “Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA),” ApJS192, 3 (2011), arXiv:1009.1622 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.