Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Characters and fusion rules of boundary W-algebras

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that two families of exceptional W-algebras in type A—a boundary algebra built from sl_n and a principal algebra built from sl_s—have the same irreducible modules, the same q-characters, and the same modular data, hence the

desk verdict Substantial new results on boundary W-algebras, but Proposition 4.20 has a load-bearing gap that the paper does not address; the main theorem is not proven as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.09039 v1 pith:3TASUCMY submitted 2025-09-10 math.QA hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.RT

Tomoyuki Arakawa , Igor Alarcon Blatt , Jethro van Ekeren , Wenbin Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.QAhep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.RT MSC 17B6917B67
keywords exceptionalW-algebrasboundaryfusionrulesq-charactersmodulardatavertexalgebrastypeAnilpotentorbitsnecklacecombinatorics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a matching theorem for two families of vertex algebras (the algebraic structures underlying two-dimensional conformal field theory) built from the Lie algebras sl_n and sl_s. For coprime u and s, with n = mu + s, the exceptional W-algebra W(sl_n[um,s], n/u) and the principal W-algebra W(sl_s[s], s/u) are shown to have the same list of irreducible modules, the same q-characters (infinite-product formulas for the graded traces), and the same modular data. Since modular data determine fusion rules, the boundary algebras inherit the fusion rules of the principal algebras, which were already known. The paper then uses a factorization phenomenon to extend this from boundary levels to all exceptional W-algebras in type A, giving a largely complete determination of their fusion rules. The result matters because it reduces a large part of W-algebra representation theory to a single combinatorial parameter—necklaces—that is independent of the integer m.

What carries the argument

The key objects are the boundary W-algebra W(sl_n[um,s], n/s) and the principal W-algebra W(sl_s[s], s/u), together with a necklace bijection between their parameter sets P^u_{+,f}: irreducible modules are indexed by circular arrangements of s long blocks and u−s short blocks, whose count is (1/u) C(u,s), independent of m. Three identities carry the argument: (1) the q-character product formula reduces character equality to m-independence of dim(m,k) + dim(m,u−k) − dim(g0); (2) the S-matrix sum over W(Γ) is reduced to a sum over the row subgroup W^f and then factors into a W^(s)-component times a phase, with the phase shown to be C_0 ε(β)ε(β′) via the Killing-form identity ⟨β,β′⟩ = (1/2)κ_{g

What would settle it

List the conformal dimensions given by formula (4.12) for all irreducible modules of W(sl_7[5,2], 7/2) (u=5, s=2, m=1) and check whether the minimum occurs exactly once. If two distinct modules have the same minimal conformal dimension, then the sign-fixing step relying on equation (2.3) and Lemma 2.11 fails to apply, and Theorem 1.1's equality of S-matrices is not established by the paper's argument. A second check: compute S-matrix entries directly for a small pair (u,s) via the determinant reduction of Section 3.4 and compare them with the S-matrix of the principal W-algebra W(sl_s[s], s/u)

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1 (with the fusion-rule version in Theorem 4.12): for n = mu + s, 1 ≤ s ≤ u − 1, gcd(s,u) = 1, the exceptional W-algebra W(sl_n[um,s], n/s) and the principal W-algebra W(sl_s[s], s/u) have irreducible modules in natural bijection, equal q-characters under that bijection, and equal modular data. The proof gives a concrete bijection: irreducible modules of both algebras are parameterized by u-bead necklaces with s long blocks—(1/u) C(u,s) of them—and the same necklace parameter appears on both sides. Equality of characters follows from a dimension-counting identity for pyramids; equality of S-matrices follows from reducing a Weyl-group sum to a sum over a row sub

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the minimal conformal dimension is attained by a unique irreducible module; Section 2.4 says this is believed true in general and verified in the cases treated in the paper, but Section 4.3.2 proves m-independence of conformal dimensions and central charge, not uniqueness. If two distinct modules tie for the minimum, the positivity of quantum dimensions and the sign-fixing step (Lemma 2.11) would require an additional argument, and the equalit

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All boundary W-algebras in type A have their fusion rules completely determined: they coincide with those of the principal W-algebra W(sl_s[s], s/u), whose fusion rules are already known.
  • For odd u and s, the Grothendieck ring of every exceptional W-algebra W(sl_n[um,s], p/u) factors as F(L_{u−s}(sl_s))^{int} ⊗ F(L_{p−n}(sl_n)), giving a largely complete determination of exceptional fusion rules in type A.
  • The q-character equality gives an explicit infinite-product formula for every irreducible module of the boundary W-algebra, with all dependence on the module encoded in a necklace parameter.
  • The new S-matrix formula yields explicit modular data in cases outside the boundary family, including a 44-module modular tensor category for the E8 subregular W-algebra at denominator 29.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the equality of modular data could be upgraded to an isomorphism of vertex algebras, the boundary and principal families would be the same object presented in different ways; the paper explicitly leaves this open, noting that equal modular data alone is not enough to force isomorphism.
  • Beyond the paper: the necklace parameter set is independent of m, suggesting the entire fusion category of W(sl_{mu+s}[um,s], n/u) stabilizes as m varies; a direct check would be to compute fusion coefficients for two different m values with the same u and s and compare them term by term.
  • Beyond the paper: the type-D application in Section 3.2 explains certain product formulas for Virasoro minimal-model characters as boundary W-algebra characters; the same mechanism likely produces analogous product formulas for other W-algebra families, and searching for them at fixed u with varying m would be a natural test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies exceptional (boundary) W-algebras in type A, focusing on the family W(sl_n[u^m,s], n/u) with n=um+s, 1≤s≤u−1, gcd(s,u)=1. Its main theorem (Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 4.12) asserts that the irreducible modules of this boundary W-algebra are in bijection with those of the principal W-algebra W(sl_s[s], s/u), that the q-characters agree under the bijection, and that the modular data, hence the fusion rules, coincide for all m. The proof combines the Kac–Wakimoto character formula (Proposition 3.1), the parametrization of admissible weights by necklaces (Theorem 4.6), equality of q-characters via pyramid combinatorics (Theorem 4.8), and a Weyl-group manipulation of the S-matrix (Propositions 4.16 and 4.20) together with conformal-dimension computations (Section 4.3.2). As an application, the paper derives a factorization of fusion rules for general exceptional W-algebras in type A (Corollaries 1.2 and 4.14), gives a conceptual explanation of product formulas for certain Virasoro characters in type D (Proposition 3.2), and presents numerical modular data for the type E_8 subregular case W(E_8(a_1),31/29).

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, it is a substantial structural result: it reduces the modular data and fusion rules of all boundary exceptional W-algebras in type A to the well-studied principal W-algebras, and hence, together with the factorisation corollary, gives a largely complete determination of fusion rules for type A exceptional W-algebras. The paper also contains valuable technical contributions: the explicit necklace parametrization, the m-independence of q-characters, the S-matrix factorisation, and the computational treatment of the E_8 subregular example. A notable strength is that many of the intermediate claims are supported by explicit formulas and finite computations rather than by abstract existence arguments. However, two load-bearing steps in the written proof need correction: the reduction in Proposition 4.20 is misstated, and the uniqueness of the minimal conformal dimension, used to fix signs via Lemma 2.11, is not actually verified in the section cited for it.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.3.1, Proposition 4.20] The derivation of (4.4) from (4.3) is not correct as printed. In (4.3) the exponent is (β, w(β')), so after restricting to w = w_f w_0 it is (β, w_f w_0(β')), not ((w_f w_0)(β), β'). The proof replaces this with (w_f(β), β') and justifies it by (β, Δ_{0,+})=0, but w_0 acts on β' in the exponent, not on β. A valid repair exists: Lemma 4.4 gives (β', Δ_0)=0, hence w_0(β')=β', so (β, w_f w_0(β'))=(β, w_f(β')); a reindexing w_f → w_f^{-1} then yields the expression used in (4.4). This repair should be written out explicitly. Because (4.4) is the pivotal identity that identifies the S-matrix with that of W(sl_s[s], s/u), the step is load-bearing for Theorem 4.12.
  2. [§2.4 and §4.3.2] The paper states in Section 2.4 that the minimal (most negative) conformal dimension is attained on a unique irreducible module, that this is 'believed to be true in general, and is verified in the cases treated in this paper (see Section 4.3.2)'. However, Section 4.3.2 only proves m-independence of the list of conformal dimensions (Corollary 4.26) and m-independence of the central charge (Proposition 4.27). It does not prove uniqueness of the minimum. This uniqueness is used in equation (2.3) to guarantee positivity of S_{i,◦}/S_{1,◦}, and Lemma 2.11 uses that positivity to eliminate the sign factors in the final S-matrix comparison. Without an explicit verification of uniqueness (or an alternative sign-fixing argument not relying on it), the conclusion of Theorem 4.12 is not fully established. This is a load-bearing gap and should be addressed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 1.1 and Abstract] The level in Theorem 1.1 and in the abstract is written as W(sl_n[u^m,s], n/s). From the rest of the paper (e.g. Proposition 4.20, Proposition 4.27, Section 4.3.2) the intended level is clearly n/u, not n/s. Please correct this typo in the theorem statement.
  2. [§4.3.1, after (4.6)] The text says 'in order to apply Proposition 2.11', but the statement used is Lemma 2.11. Please fix the cross-reference.
  3. [§4.3.1, proof of Proposition 4.16] In the use of Lemma 4.15 to average over W_0, the constant |W_0| arising from the identity is absorbed into C(λ,λ') without comment. This is harmless but should be stated for clarity.
  4. [§3.4] For the E_8 subregular example, the choices of y ∈ W giving the listed β are said to exist but are not recorded. Since the numerical S-matrix data rely on these choices, a remark on how they are obtained (or a reference to a computational appendix) would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central claims derive from external character/Verlinde theorems plus new combinatorics; self-citations are independent.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing chain is: (a) q-character equality (Thm 4.8) from the Kac-Wakimoto product formula [38] (Prop 3.1) plus an elementary pyramid-counting induction; (b) self-duality (Cor 4.9) from Li's theorem plus (a); (c) S-matrix equality (§4.3.1) from the S-matrix formula (3.3)/(3.4), which generalizes [7, Thm 10.4], and from new lemmas (4.15-4.24) controlling Weyl-group sums and projections; (d) T-matrix equality (§4.3.2) from the explicit conformal-dimension formula (4.12) and the computation that N_m(a) is independent of m. The conjectured isomorphism [8,47] appears only as a remark after the theorem ('This result strongly suggests ... as was conjectured'), not as a premise. [7] is invoked for rationality/module classification and the S-matrix formula; it is a published theorem whose assumptions do not include the boundary-principal equality, so it is independent support under the stated rules. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: both sides' q-characters and modular matrices are computed from the same external formulas, and the bijection between modules is established by independent combinatorial necklaces counting. The paper flags an unproved uniqueness of the minimal conformal dimension (§2.4, 'believed to be true in general') and the proof in §4.3.2 only establishes m-independence, not uniqueness; the reviewer's objection to Prop 4.20 is a potential algebraic gap in replacing ([w_f w_0](β),β') by (w_f(β),β'). Both are correctness concerns, not circularity. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted or chosen ad hoc; all inputs are standard discrete data (levels, partitions, necklaces). The axioms are standard theorems and domain assumptions from the vertex algebra literature, cited in the paper. No new physical or algebraic entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Exceptional W-algebras W(O_u, p/u) are lisse and rational (Arakawa [4], McRae [40], Arakawa-van Ekeren [7]).
    Invoked throughout; rationality makes modular tensor category and Verlinde formula applicable (Section 2.4).
  • domain assumption Classification of irreducible modules: under the hypotheses of Theorem 2.7, {H^0_{f,-}(L_k(lambda)) | lambda in X-hat} exhausts irreducible modules of W(O_u,p/u); in type A the hypotheses hold via [7, Thm 8.7].
    The bijection of modules in Theorem 4.6 and the S-matrix computations depend on this classification.
  • standard math Kac-Wakimoto character formula and modular transformation coefficients a(lambda,lambda') (3.2) for admissible characters [35,32].
    Used for the product formula Prop 3.1 and S-matrix formula Prop 3.5.
  • standard math Boundary level has P^{h^vee,reg}_+ = {rho} (standard), so nu=rho in Prop 3.6.
    Basis of the simplified boundary S-matrix formula.
  • domain assumption Positivity of quantum dimensions: FPdim(i)=S_{i,circle}/S_{1,circle}>0, with the minimal index circle; uniqueness of the minimal conformal dimension 'verified in cases treated' (Section 2.4).
    Used in Lemma 2.11 to eliminate sign ambiguities in the S-matrix comparison; see red flag about the verification gap.
  • domain assumption For u,s odd, the Dynkin grading of sl_n corresponding to O_u is a good even grading and the W-algebra is self-dual [8, Prop 4.2] (Cor 4.14).
    Needed for the fusion-rule factorization corollary.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Characters and fusion rules of boundary W-algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3TASUCMY

@misc{pith2026250909039,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Characters and fusion rules of boundary W-algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3TASUCMY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.09039}
}
read the original abstract

We study the q-characters and modular data of exceptional W-algebras and give several examples and applications. We establish equality of q-characters and modular data between certain boundary W-algebras, leading in particular to a largely complete determination of fusion rules of exceptional W-algebras in type A.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 91(2):167–197, 2010

    Luis F Alday, Davide Gaiotto, and Yuji Tachikawa. Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 91(2):167–197, 2010

    2010

  2. [2]

    Representation theory ofW-algebras.Inventiones mathematicae, 169(2):219–320, 2007

    Tomoyuki Arakawa. Representation theory ofW-algebras.Inventiones mathematicae, 169(2):219–320, 2007

    2007

  3. [3]

    Representation theory ofW-algebras, II.Exploring new structures and natural constructions in mathematical physics, 61:51–90, 2011

    Tomoyuki Arakawa. Representation theory ofW-algebras, II.Exploring new structures and natural constructions in mathematical physics, 61:51–90, 2011

    2011

  4. [4]

    Associated varieties of modules over Kac-Moody algebras andC 2-cofiniteness of W-algebras.International Mathematics Research Notices, 2015(22):11605–11666, 2015

    Tomoyuki Arakawa. Associated varieties of modules over Kac-Moody algebras andC 2-cofiniteness of W-algebras.International Mathematics Research Notices, 2015(22):11605–11666, 2015

    2015

  5. [5]

    Rationality of admissible affine vertex algebras in the categoryO.Duke Mathemat- ical Journal, 165(1):67–93, 2016

    Tomoyuki Arakawa. Rationality of admissible affine vertex algebras in the categoryO.Duke Mathemat- ical Journal, 165(1):67–93, 2016

    2016

  6. [6]

    Modularity of relatively rational vertex algebras and fusion rules of principal affineW-algebras.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 370(1):205–247, 2019

    Tomoyuki Arakawa and Jethro van Ekeren. Modularity of relatively rational vertex algebras and fusion rules of principal affineW-algebras.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 370(1):205–247, 2019

    2019

  7. [7]

    Rationality and fusion rules of exceptionalW-algebras

    Tomoyuki Arakawa and Jethro van Ekeren. Rationality and fusion rules of exceptionalW-algebras. Journal of the European Mathematical Society (EMS Publishing), 25(7), 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Singularities of nilpotent Slodowy slices and collapsing levels ofW-algebras.Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, 12:95, 2024

    Tomoyuki Arakawa, Jethro Van Ekeren, and Anne Moreau. Singularities of nilpotent Slodowy slices and collapsing levels ofW-algebras.Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, 12:95, 2024

    2024

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    American Mathematical Society Providence, RI, 2001

    Bojko Bakalov and Alexander Kirillov.Lectures on tensor categories and modular functors, volume 21. American Mathematical Society Providence, RI, 2001

    2001

  2. [10]

    Infinite chiral symmetry in four dimensions.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 336(3):1359–1433, 2015

    Christopher Beem, Madalena Lemos, Pedro Liendo, Wolfger Peelaers, Leonardo Rastelli, and Balt C Van Rees. Infinite chiral symmetry in four dimensions.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 336(3):1359–1433, 2015

    2015

  3. [11]

    Quantization of Hitchin’s integrable system and Hecke eigensheaves

    Alexander Beilinson and Vladimir Drinfeld. Quantization of Hitchin’s integrable system and Hecke eigensheaves. Retrieved fromhttps://math.uchicago.edu/ ~drinfeld/langlands/ QuantizationHitchin.pdf, 1991

    1991

  4. [12]

    Number 918 in Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society

    Jonathan Brundan and Alexander Kleshchev.Representations of shifted Yangians and finiteW-algebras. Number 918 in Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Society, Prov- idence, RI, 2008

    2008

  5. [13]

    Inverse Hamiltonian reduction in typeAand generalized slices in the affine Grassmannian.arXiv preprintarXiv: 2503

    Dylan Butson and Sujay Nair. Inverse Hamiltonian reduction in typeAand generalized slices in the affine Grassmannian.arXiv preprintarXiv: 2503. 19882, 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Factorized combinations of Virasoro characters.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 209(1):179–205, 2000

    Andrei G Bytsko and Andreas Fring. Factorized combinations of Virasoro characters.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 209(1):179–205, 2000

    2000

  7. [15]

    CRC Press, 1993

    David H Collingwood and William M McGovern.Nilpotent orbits in semisimple Lie algebra: an intro- duction. CRC Press, 1993

    1993

  8. [16]

    Remarks on Galois symmetry in rational conformal field theories

    Antoine Coste and Terry Gannon. Remarks on Galois symmetry in rational conformal field theories. Physics Letters B, 323(3-4):316–321, 1994

    1994

  9. [17]

    Congruence subgroups and rational conformal field theory

    Antoine Coste and Terry Gannon. Congruence subgroups and rational conformal field theory. arXiv preprintarxiv:math/9909080, 1999

    1999 arXiv

  10. [18]

    On the structure of W-algebras in typeA.Japanese Journal of Mathematics, 20(1):1–111, 2025

    Thomas Creutzig, Justine Fasquel, Andrew R Linshaw, and Shigenori Nakatsuka. On the structure of W-algebras in typeA.Japanese Journal of Mathematics, 20(1):1–111, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    Quantum dimensions and quantum Galois theory.Trans- actions of the American Mathematical Society, 365(12):6441–6469, 2013

    Chongying Dong, Xiangyu Jiao, and Feng Xu. Quantum dimensions and quantum Galois theory.Trans- actions of the American Mathematical Society, 365(12):6441–6469, 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    Rational vertex operator algebras and the effective central charge

    Chongying Dong and Geoffrey Mason. Rational vertex operator algebras and the effective central charge. International Mathematics Research Notices, 2004(56):2989–3008, 2004

    2004

  13. [21]

    Classification of good gradings of simple Lie algebras.American Mathematical Society Translations: Series 2, pages 85–104, 2005

    AG Elashvili and VG Kac. Classification of good gradings of simple Lie algebras.American Mathematical Society Translations: Series 2, pages 85–104, 2005

    2005

  14. [22]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2015

    Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki, Dmitri Nikshych, and Victor Ostrik.Tensor categories, volume 205. American Mathematical Soc., 2015

    2015

  15. [23]

    Andrews–Gordon type identities from combinations of Virasoro characters.The Ramanujan Journal, 17(1):33–52, 2008

    Boris Feigin, Omar Foda, and Trevor Welsh. Andrews–Gordon type identities from combinations of Virasoro characters.The Ramanujan Journal, 17(1):33–52, 2008

    2008

  16. [24]

    Affine Kac-Moody algebras at the critical level and Gelfand-Dikii algebras.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 7(supp01a):197–215, 1992

    Boris Feigin and Edward Frenkel. Affine Kac-Moody algebras at the critical level and Gelfand-Dikii algebras.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 7(supp01a):197–215, 1992. 31

    1992

  17. [25]

    Cylindric partitions,Wr-characters and the Andrews-Gordon-Bressoud identities.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 49(16):164004, 2016

    Omar Foda and Trevor A Welsh. Cylindric partitions,Wr-characters and the Andrews-Gordon-Bressoud identities.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 49(16):164004, 2016

    2016

  18. [26]

    Characters and fusion rules forW-algebras via quantized Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction.Communications in mathematical physics, 147(2):295–328, 1992

    Edward Frenkel, Victor Kac, and Minoru Wakimoto. Characters and fusion rules forW-algebras via quantized Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction.Communications in mathematical physics, 147(2):295–328, 1992

    1992

  19. [27]

    Vertex operator algebras associated to representations of affine and Virasoro algebras.Duke Mathematical Journal, 66(1):123–168, 1992

    Igor B Frenkel and Yongchang Zhu. Vertex operator algebras associated to representations of affine and Virasoro algebras.Duke Mathematical Journal, 66(1):123–168, 1992

    1992

  20. [28]

    Modular data for the extended Haagerup subfactor.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 356:981–1015, 2017

    Terry Gannon and Scott Morrison. Modular data for the extended Haagerup subfactor.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 356:981–1015, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    Reduction by stages for affineW-algebras

    Naoki Genra and Thibault Juillard. Reduction by stages for affineW-algebras. arXiv preprintarXiv: 2501.04501, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Rigidity and modularity of vertex tensor categories.Communications in contemporary mathematics, 10(supp01):871–911, 2008

    Yi-Zhi Huang. Rigidity and modularity of vertex tensor categories.Communications in contemporary mathematics, 10(supp01):871–911, 2008

    2008

  23. [31]

    Quantum reduction for affine superalgebras.Com- munications in Mathematical Physics, 241, 2003

    Victor Kac, Shi-Shyr Roan, and Minoru Wakimoto. Quantum reduction for affine superalgebras.Com- munications in Mathematical Physics, 241, 2003

    2003

  24. [32]

    Classification of modular invariant representations of affine algebras

    Victor Kac and Minoru Wakimoto. Classification of modular invariant representations of affine algebras. InInfinite-dimensional Lie algebras and groups (Luminy-Marseille, 1988), volume 7 ofAdvanced Series in Mathematical Physics, pages 138–177. World Scientific Publishing, Tean...

    1988

  25. [33]

    Number 10 in University Lecture Series

    Victor G Kac.Vertex algebras for beginners. Number 10 in University Lecture Series. American Math- ematical Soc., 1998

    1998

  26. [34]

    Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, theta functions and modular forms.Advances in Mathematics, 53(2):125–264, 1984

    Victor G Kac and Dale H Peterson. Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, theta functions and modular forms.Advances in Mathematics, 53(2):125–264, 1984

    1984

  27. [35]

    Modular invariant representations of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras and superalgebras.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 85(14):4956–4960, 1988

    Victor G Kac and Minoru Wakimoto. Modular invariant representations of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras and superalgebras.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 85(14):4956–4960, 1988

    1988

  28. [36]

    Branching functions for winding subalgebras and tensor products

    Victor G Kac and Minoru Wakimoto. Branching functions for winding subalgebras and tensor products. Topics in Computational Algebra, pages 3–39, 1990

    1990

  29. [37]

    On rationality ofW-algebras.Transformation Groups, 13(3):671– 713, 2008

    Victor G Kac and Minoru Wakimoto. On rationality ofW-algebras.Transformation Groups, 13(3):671– 713, 2008

    2008

  30. [38]

    A remark on boundary level admissible representations.Comptes Rendus

    Victor G Kac and Minoru Wakimoto. A remark on boundary level admissible representations.Comptes Rendus. Math´ ematique, 355(2):128–132, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    Symmetric invariant bilinear forms on vertex operator algebras.Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 96(3):279–297, 1994

    Hai-sheng Li. Symmetric invariant bilinear forms on vertex operator algebras.Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 96(3):279–297, 1994

    1994

  32. [40]

    On rationality forC 2-cofinite vertex operator algebras

    Robert McRae. On rationality forC 2-cofinite vertex operator algebras. arXiv preprintarXiv:2108. 01898, 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Classical and quantum conformal field theory.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 123(2):177–254, 1989

    Gregory Moore and Nathan Seiberg. Classical and quantum conformal field theory.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 123(2):177–254, 1989

    1989

  34. [42]

    On Bethe equations of 2d conformal field theory.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2024(9):1–105, 2024

    Tom´ aˇ s Proch´ azka and Akimi Watanabe. On Bethe equations of 2d conformal field theory.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2024(9):1–105, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Cherednik algebras,W-algebras and the equivariant cohomology of the moduli space of instantons onA 2.Publications math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES, 118(1):213–342, 2013

    Olivier Schiffmann and Eric Vasserot. Cherednik algebras,W-algebras and the equivariant cohomology of the moduli space of instantons onA 2.Publications math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES, 118(1):213–342, 2013

    2013

  36. [44]

    Modularity forW-algebras and affine Springer fibres

    P Shan, D Xie, and W Yan. Modularity forW-algebras and affine Springer fibres. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.00760, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Stanley.Enumerative Combinatorics

    Richard P. Stanley.Enumerative Combinatorics. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cam- bridge University Press, 1999

    1999

  38. [46]

    Some isomorphisms between exceptionalW-algebras

    Jethro van Ekeren and Shigenori Nakatsuka. Some isomorphisms between exceptionalW-algebras. arXiv preprintarXiv:2408.08371, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Dan Xie and Wenbin Yan.W-algebras, cosets and VOAs for 4dN= 2 SCFTs from M5 branes.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(4):1–48, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    Chiral algebra of the Argyres-Douglas theory from M5 branes.Physical Review D, 103(6):065003, 2021

    Dan Xie, Wenbin Yan, and Shing-Tung Yau. Chiral algebra of the Argyres-Douglas theory from M5 branes.Physical Review D, 103(6):065003, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    Module categories of simple current extensions of vertex operator algebras.Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 189(1-3):315–328, 2004

    Hiroshi Yamauchi. Module categories of simple current extensions of vertex operator algebras.Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 189(1-3):315–328, 2004

    2004

  42. [50]

    Modular invariance of characters of vertex operator algebras.Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 9(1):237–302, 1996

    Yongchang Zhu. Modular invariance of characters of vertex operator algebras.Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 9(1):237–302, 1996. 32 2Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502 JAPAN Email address:arakawa@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp 2In...

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.