REVIEW 2 cited by
r-Process Nucleosynthesis With Ab Initio Nuclear Masses Around The N=82 Shell Closure
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
r-Process Nucleosynthesis With Ab Initio Nuclear Masses Around The N=82 Shell Closure
read the original abstract
Our understanding of the origin of heavy elements beyond iron relies on the rapid neutron capture process (r-process), which accounts for roughly half of their cosmic abundance. However, the extreme neutron-rich conditions required for the r-process involve many nuclei that remain experimentally inaccessible, making theoretical predictions essential. We explore the impact of nuclear masses calculated with the ab initio valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group, focusing on the region around the N = 82 shell closure. We show for the first time that such ab initio mass calculations can be used to refine r-process predictions compared to global, but more phenomenological mass models. With the ab initio masses, the waiting point of the second r-process peak is strengthened, which leads to an overall slower nucleosynthesis flow, lower abundances of nuclei beyond the peak, and a stronger shift of the third r-process peak.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
High-order perturbative calculations of nuclear ground states: Automated evaluation of many-body diagrams
Automated MBPT up to fifth order shows convergence trends in ground-state energies of closed-shell nuclei and decomposes fourth-order terms while comparing to IMSRG.
-
Computational schemes for the Magnus expansion of the in-medium similarity renormalization group
The hunter-gatherer scheme for the Magnus expansion in IMSRG(3) approximations introduces differences of up to 7 MeV in ground-state energies and 0.5 MeV in excitation energies compared to standard IMSRG(2) methods.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.