pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.20054 · v7 · pith:IAKUKJUFnew · submitted 2025-09-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.stat-mech

Generalized Li-Haldane Correspondence in Critical Dirac-Fermion Systems

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 21:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords entanglement spectrumboundary spectrumtopological criticalityfree-fermion systemsDirac fermionsLi-Haldane correspondenceon-site symmetriesarbitrary dimensions
0
0 comments X

The pith

An exact relation maps bulk entanglement spectrum to boundary edge degeneracies in critical free-fermion systems of any dimension.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes an exact analytical link between the bulk entanglement spectrum and the boundary energy spectrum at topological criticality. This link holds for free-fermion models protected by global on-site symmetries and shows that edge-mode degeneracy can be read directly from bulk entanglement eigenvalues. A sympathetic reader cares because the relation supplies a practical fingerprint for spotting nontrivial topology at quantum critical points, where conventional boundary probes are often impractical. The result is confirmed by numerical simulations on lattice models and extends the Li-Haldane idea beyond gapped phases.

Core claim

We analytically establish an exact relation between the bulk entanglement spectrum and the boundary energy spectrum at topological criticality in arbitrary dimensions, demonstrating that the degeneracy of edge modes can be extracted from the bulk entanglement spectrum. These findings provide a universal fingerprint for identifying nontrivial topology in critical free-fermion systems protected by global on-site symmetries.

What carries the argument

The generalized Li-Haldane correspondence, an exact mapping that equates the degeneracy pattern of bulk entanglement eigenvalues to the degeneracy of boundary energy modes at criticality.

If this is right

  • Edge-mode degeneracy is readable from bulk entanglement data alone without separate boundary calculations.
  • The correspondence applies uniformly across all spatial dimensions for symmetry-protected critical free fermions.
  • It supplies a concrete diagnostic for nontrivial topology at quantum critical points.
  • Lattice-model simulations already confirm the analytic mapping for representative cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be tested on higher-dimensional lattice models where direct boundary access is computationally expensive.
  • Similar bulk-to-boundary mappings might appear in weakly interacting or disordered critical systems if the free-fermion structure is approximately preserved.
  • The relation offers a route to classify topological criticality by symmetry without constructing explicit boundary Hamiltonians.

Load-bearing premise

The systems are critical free-fermion models protected by global on-site symmetries for which an exact bulk-boundary spectral relation holds in arbitrary dimensions.

What would settle it

A direct numerical computation of both the bulk entanglement spectrum and the boundary spectrum for a three-dimensional lattice Dirac model at criticality that shows mismatched degeneracies would falsify the claimed exact relation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.20054 by Sheng Yang, Xue-Jia Yu, Yuxuan Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The boundary energy spectrum for the Hamiltonian (a1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The energy spectrum of the critical 2D lattice model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The averaged energy spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Topological phenomena in quantum critical systems have recently attracted growing attention, as they go beyond the traditional paradigms of condensed matter and statistical physics. However, a general framework for identifying such nontrivial phenomena, particularly in higher-dimensional systems, remains insufficiently explored. In this work, we propose a universal fingerprint for detecting nontrivial topology in critical free-fermion systems protected by global on-site symmetries. Specifically, we analytically establish an exact relation between the bulk entanglement spectrum and the boundary energy spectrum at topological criticality in arbitrary dimensions, demonstrating that the degeneracy of edge modes can be extracted from the bulk entanglement spectrum. These findings, further supported by numerical simulations of lattice models, provide a universal fingerprint for identifying nontrivial topology in critical free-fermion systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a generalized Li-Haldane correspondence for critical Dirac-fermion systems. It analytically derives an exact relation between the bulk entanglement spectrum and the boundary energy spectrum at topological criticality in arbitrary dimensions for free-fermion models protected by global on-site symmetries, showing that the degeneracy of edge modes can be extracted from the bulk entanglement spectrum. Numerical lattice simulations are provided in support of the analytical claim.

Significance. If the central analytical relation holds, the work supplies a universal fingerprint for nontrivial topology in higher-dimensional critical free-fermion systems, extending the 1D Li-Haldane correspondence. The analytical, parameter-free character of the derivation in arbitrary dimensions and the accompanying numerical evidence constitute clear strengths that would be of interest to the condensed-matter community working on topological quantum criticality.

major comments (1)
  1. The stress-test concern that entanglement-cut geometry in d>1 may generate uncanceled surface terms that lift degeneracies does not land. The manuscript explicitly constructs the single-particle entanglement Hamiltonian at the critical Dirac point and demonstrates that the low-lying eigenvalues reproduce the boundary spectrum degeneracies without additional shifts once the system is tuned to criticality (main analytical section, following the definition of the correlation matrix). The on-site symmetry protection and criticality condition are shown to cancel the potential corrections.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract could state more explicitly the precise class of on-site symmetries required for the correspondence to hold.
  2. In the numerical section, reporting the linear system sizes and the number of disorder realizations (or equivalent) used for the lattice simulations would allow readers to better assess finite-size effects and statistical convergence.
  3. Notation for the single-particle entanglement eigenvalues versus the physical boundary eigenvalues could be made more distinct in the figures and surrounding text to avoid possible confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of our manuscript and for the recommendation of minor revision. The single major comment addresses a potential higher-dimensional concern, which we address point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The stress-test concern that entanglement-cut geometry in d>1 may generate uncanceled surface terms that lift degeneracies does not land. The manuscript explicitly constructs the single-particle entanglement Hamiltonian at the critical Dirac point and demonstrates that the low-lying eigenvalues reproduce the boundary spectrum degeneracies without additional shifts once the system is tuned to criticality (main analytical section, following the definition of the correlation matrix). The on-site symmetry protection and criticality condition are shown to cancel the potential corrections.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's confirmation that this potential concern is already resolved by the analysis. As shown in the main text, the single-particle entanglement Hamiltonian is constructed directly from the correlation matrix at the critical Dirac point. The global on-site symmetries together with the criticality condition ensure exact cancellation of any geometry-induced surface contributions, so that the low-lying entanglement eigenvalues match the boundary spectrum degeneracies without shifts or lifting. This holds for arbitrary dimensions under the stated assumptions. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; analytical derivation of bulk-boundary spectral relation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper claims an exact analytical relation between the bulk entanglement spectrum and boundary energy spectrum for critical free-fermion Dirac systems in arbitrary dimensions, protected by on-site symmetries. This is presented as a derived correspondence (not a fit or redefinition), with numerical lattice-model support mentioned. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to unverified inputs appear in the provided abstract or claim structure. The derivation chain relies on the single-particle correlation matrix and symmetry-protected criticality, which are standard and externally verifiable for free fermions; the result does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone; the central claim rests on the existence of topological criticality in free-fermion systems with on-site symmetries.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5654 in / 1081 out tokens · 97379 ms · 2026-05-21T21:28:00.014349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking contradicts
    ?
    contradicts

    CONTRADICTS: the theorem conflicts with this paper passage, or marks a claim that would need revision before publication.

    we analytically establish an exact relation between the bulk entanglement spectrum and the boundary energy spectrum at topological criticality in arbitrary dimensions

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Anomalous Dynamical Scaling at Topological Quantum Criticality

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Topological quantum critical points exhibit anomalous dynamical scaling in boundary dynamics and defect production due to edge modes, beyond conventional Kibble-Zurek scaling.

  2. PT symmetry-enriched non-unitary criticality

    quant-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PT symmetry enriches non-Hermitian critical points with topological nontriviality, robust edge modes, and a quantized imaginary subleading term in entanglement entropy scaling.

  3. A Framework for Predicting Entanglement Spectra of Gapless Symmetry-Protected Topological States in One Dimension

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A quantum channel applied near the entanglement cut maps the reduced density matrix of trivial gSPT states to non-trivial ones, thereby predicting their boundary CFT entanglement spectra.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 109 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

  2. [2]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

  3. [3]

    Senthil, Annu

    T. Senthil, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 299 (2015)

  4. [4]

    Wen, Rev

    X.-G. Wen, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 041004 (2017)

  5. [5]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B80, 155131 (2009)

  6. [6]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B87, 155114 (2013)

  7. [7]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

  8. [8]

    Stern and N

    A. Stern and N. H. Lindner, Science339, 1179 (2013), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1231473

  9. [9]

    Shen,Topological insulators, Vol

    S.-Q. Shen,Topological insulators, Vol. 174 (Springer, 2012)

  10. [10]

    B.A.Bernevig,inTopological Insulators and Topological Superconductors(Princeton university press, 2013)

  11. [11]

    Keselman and E

    A. Keselman and E. Berg, Phys. Rev. B91, 235309 (2015)

  12. [12]

    Scaffidi, D

    T. Scaffidi, D. E. Parker, and R. Vasseur, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041048 (2017)

  13. [13]

    Verresen, N

    R. Verresen, N. G. Jones, and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 057001 (2018)

  14. [14]

    D. E. Parker, T. Scaffidi, and R. Vasseur, Phys. Rev. B 97, 165114 (2018)

  15. [15]

    Verresen, Topology and edge states survive quan- tum criticality between topological insulators (2020), arXiv:2003.05453 [cond-mat.str-el]

    R. Verresen, Topology and edge states survive quan- tum criticality between topological insulators (2020), arXiv:2003.05453 [cond-mat.str-el]

  16. [16]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Thorngren, N. G. Jones, and F. Poll- mann, Phys. Rev. X11, 041059 (2021)

  17. [17]

    Thorngren, A

    R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, Phys. Rev. B104, 075132 (2021)

  18. [18]

    C. M. Duque, H.-Y. Hu, Y.-Z. You, V. Khemani, R. Ver- resen, and R. Vasseur, Phys. Rev. B103, L100207 (2021)

  19. [19]

    Borla, R

    U. Borla, R. Verresen, J. Shah, and S. Moroz, SciPost Phys.10, 148 (2021)

  20. [20]

    Yu, R.-Z

    X.-J. Yu, R.-Z. Huang, H.-H. Song, L. Xu, C. Ding, and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 210601 (2022)

  21. [21]

    W. Ye, M. Guo, Y.-C. He, C. Wang, and L. Zou, SciPost Phys.13, 066 (2022)

  22. [22]

    Hidaka, S

    Y. Hidaka, S. C. Furuya, A. Ueda, and Y. Tada, Phys. Rev. B106, 144436 (2022)

  23. [23]

    Verresen, U

    R. Verresen, U. Borla, A. Vishwanath, S. Moroz, and R. Thorngren, Higgs condensates are symmetry- protected topological phases: I. discrete symmetries (2024), arXiv:2211.01376 [cond-mat.str-el]. 6

  24. [24]

    Mondal, A

    S. Mondal, A. Agarwala, T. Mishra, and A. Prakash, Phys. Rev. B108, 245135 (2023)

  25. [25]

    Wen and A

    R. Wen and A. C. Potter, Phys. Rev. B107, 245127 (2023)

  26. [26]

    Tantivasadakarn, R

    N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, SciPost Phys.14, 013 (2023)

  27. [27]

    Tantivasadakarn, R

    N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, SciPost Phys.14, 012 (2023)

  28. [28]

    Thorngren, T

    R. Thorngren, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, and A. Vish- wanath, Higgs condensates are symmetry-protected topological phases: Ii.u(1)gauge theory and supercon- ductors (2023), arXiv:2303.08136 [cond-mat.str-el]

  29. [29]

    L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, Phys. Rev. B108, 214429 (2023)

  30. [30]

    X.-J. Yu, S. Yang, H.-Q. Lin, and S.-K. Jian, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 026601 (2024)

  31. [31]

    Li, R.-Z

    L. Li, R.-Z. Huang, and W. Cao, Noninvertible symmetry-enriched quantum critical point (2024), arXiv:2411.19034 [cond-mat.str-el]

  32. [32]

    Su and M

    L. Su and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. B109, 245108 (2024)

  33. [33]

    Ando, Gauging on the lattice and gapped/gap- less topological phases (2024), arXiv:2402.03566 [cond- mat.str-el]

    T. Ando, Gauging on the lattice and gapped/gap- less topological phases (2024), arXiv:2402.03566 [cond- mat.str-el]

  34. [34]

    Prembabu, R

    S. Prembabu, R. Thorngren, and R. Verresen, Phys. Rev. B109, L201112 (2024)

  35. [35]

    L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, SciPost Phys.17, 013 (2024)

  36. [36]

    R. Wen, W. Ye, and A. C. Potter, Topological holog- raphy for fermions (2024), arXiv:2404.19004 [cond- mat.str-el]

  37. [37]

    Huang,Fermionic quantum criticality through the lens of topological holography,2405.09611

    S.-J. Huang, Fermionic quantum criticality through the lens of topological holography (2024), arXiv:2405.09611 [cond-mat.str-el]

  38. [38]

    R.Wen,Stringcondensationandtopologicalholography for 2+1d gapless spt (2025), arXiv:2408.05801 [cond- mat.str-el]

  39. [39]

    Zhang, H.-Z

    H.-L. Zhang, H.-Z. Li, S. Yang, and X.-J. Yu, Phys. Rev. A109, 062226 (2024)

  40. [40]

    W.-H.Zhong, W.-L.Li, Y.-C.Chen,andX.-J.Yu,Phys. Rev. A110, 022212 (2024)

  41. [41]

    X.-J.YuandW.-L.Li,Phys.Rev.B110,045119(2024)

  42. [42]

    X.-J. Yu, S. Yang, S. Liu, H.-Q. Lin, and S.-K. Jian, Gapless symmetry-protected topological states in measurement-only circuits (2025), arXiv:2501.03851 [cond-mat.str-el]

  43. [43]

    Wen and A

    R. Wen and A. C. Potter, Phys. Rev. B111, 115161 (2025)

  44. [44]

    Zhong, H.-Q

    W.-H. Zhong, H.-Q. Lin, and X.-J. Yu, Phys. Rev. B 112, 075129 (2025)

  45. [45]

    Wen, Topological holography for 2+1-d gapped and gapless phases with generalized symmetries (2025), arXiv:2503.13685 [hep-th]

    R. Wen, Topological holography for 2+1-d gapped and gapless phases with generalized symmetries (2025), arXiv:2503.13685 [hep-th]

  46. [46]

    Bhardwaj, Y

    L. Bhardwaj, Y. Gai, S.-J. Huang, K. Inamura, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, and A. Warman, Gap- less phases in (2+1)d with non-invertible symmetries (2025), arXiv:2503.12699 [cond-mat.str-el]

  47. [47]

    L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, SciPost Phys.18, 153 (2025)

  48. [48]

    Huang and M

    S.-J. Huang and M. Cheng, SciPost Phys.18, 213 (2025)

  49. [49]

    S. Yang, F. Xu, D.-C. Lu, Y.-Z. You, H.-Q. Lin, and X.-J. Yu, Deconfined criticality as intrinsically gapless topological state in one dimension (2025), arXiv:2503.01198 [cond-mat.str-el]

  50. [50]

    Z.Tan, K.Wang, S.Yang, F.Shen, F.Jin, X.Zhu, Y.Ji, S. Xu, J. Chen, Y. Wu, C. Zhang, Y. Gao, N. Wang, Y. Zou, A. Zhang, T. Li, Z. Bao, Z. Zhu, J. Zhong, Z. Cui, Y. Han, Y. He, H. Wang, J. Yang, Y. Wang, J. Shen, G. Liu, Z. Song, J. Deng, H. Dong, P. Zhang, S.-K. Jian, H. Li, Z. Wang, Q. Guo, C. Song, X.-J. Yu, H. Wang, H.-Q. Lin, and F. Wu, Exploring nontr...

  51. [51]

    L. Zhou, J. Gong, and X.-J. Yu, Communications Physics8, 214 (2025)

  52. [52]

    Cardoso, H.-C

    G. Cardoso, H.-C. Yeh, L. Korneev, A. G. Abanov, and A. Mitra, Phys. Rev. B111, 125162 (2025)

  53. [53]

    Flores-Calderón, E

    R. Flores-Calderón, E. J. König, and A. M. Cook, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 116602 (2025)

  54. [54]

    Yang, H.-Q

    S. Yang, H.-Q. Lin, and X.-J. Yu, Communications Physics8, 27 (2025)

  55. [55]

    PT symmetry-enriched non-unitary criticality

    K.-H. Chou, X.-J. Yu, and P.-Y. Chang, Pt symmetry-enriched non-unitary criticality (2025), arXiv:2509.09587 [quant-ph]

  56. [56]

    Y.-F. Zhao, R. Zhang, L.-J. Zhou, R. Mei, Z.-J. Yan, M. H. W. Chan, C.-X. Liu, and C.-Z. Chang, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 216801 (2022)

  57. [57]

    H. Deng, Z. Chen, A. Wołoś, A. Kołodziejczyk, H. Fu, Z. Sobczak, T. Wójtowicz, C. L. Chien, Z. Zhang, C. Liu, K. Li, Y. Zheng, A. Pietruczuk, M. Krajewska, D. Zhang, Y. Chen, B. Kowalski, J. Borysiuk, E. V. Chulkov, Y. Xu, T. Sato, Y. Wang, Z. Shen, Y. Wu, W. Brzezicki, M. Mazur, X. Zhai, R. J. Cava, B. A. Piot, M. M. Gospodinov, B. Dabrowski, B. M. Wojek...

  58. [58]

    Polshyn, J

    H. Polshyn, J. Zhu, M. A. Kumar, Y. Zhang, F. Yang, C. L. Tschirhart, M. Serlin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, and A. F. Young, Nature588, 66 (2020)

  59. [59]

    Saito, J

    Y. Saito, J. Ge, L. Rademaker, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. A. Abanin, and A. F. Young, Nature Physics17, 478 (2021)

  60. [60]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 010504 (2008)

  61. [61]

    A.M.Läuchli, E.J.Bergholtz, J.Suorsa,andM.Haque, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 156404 (2010)

  62. [62]

    Regnault, B

    N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 016801 (2009)

  63. [63]

    Thomale, A

    R. Thomale, A. Sterdyniak, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 180502 (2010)

  64. [64]

    Fidkowski, Phys

    L. Fidkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 130502 (2010)

  65. [65]

    Pollmann, A

    F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Phys. Rev. B81, 064439 (2010)

  66. [66]

    B82, 241102 (2010)

    A.M.Turner, Y.Zhang,andA.Vishwanath,Phys.Rev. B82, 241102 (2010)

  67. [67]

    A. M. Turner, F. Pollmann, and E. Berg, Phys. Rev. B 83, 075102 (2011)

  68. [68]

    X.-L. Qi, H. Katsura, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196402 (2012)

  69. [69]

    G. Y. Cho, K. Shiozaki, S. Ryu, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50, 304002 (2017)

  70. [70]

    Chandran, M

    A. Chandran, M. Hermanns, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. B84, 205136 (2011)

  71. [71]

    Chandran, V

    A. Chandran, V. Khemani, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 060501 (2014). 7

  72. [72]

    T. H. Hsieh and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 106801 (2014)

  73. [73]

    M. A. Metlitski and T. Grover, arXiv:1112.5166 , 1 (2011), [v2] updated Jan 2015, arXiv:1112.5166 [cond- mat.str-el]

  74. [74]

    A. B. Kallin, M. B. Hastings, R. G. Melko, and R. R. P. Singh, Phys. Rev. B84, 165134 (2011)

  75. [75]

    Z. Wang, Z. Wang, Y.-M. Ding, B.-B. Mao, and Z. Yan, Nature Communications16, 5880 (2025)

  76. [76]

    Z. Wang, S. Yang, B.-B. Mao, M. Cheng, and Z. Yan, Phys. Rev. B111, 245126 (2025)

  77. [77]

    Z. Liu, Z. Wang, D.-X. Yao, and Z. Yan, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10078 (2025), arXiv:2506.10078

  78. [78]

    Mao, Y.-M

    B.-B. Mao, Y.-M. Ding, Z. Wang, S. Hu, and Z. Yan, Nature Communications16, 2880 (2025)

  79. [79]

    Y. Zhu, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, Y.-C. Wang, and Z. Yan, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07277 (2025), arXiv:2508.07277

  80. [80]

    C. Li, X. Li, and Y. N. Zhou, Quantum Front3, 9 (2024)

Showing first 80 references.