pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2509.25838 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · hep-ph· nucl-th

Bulk viscosity from neutron decays to dark baryons in neutron star matter

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 12:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE hep-phnucl-th
keywords dark baryonsneutron dark decaybulk viscosityneutron star mergersUrca processesequation of statedark sectordense matter transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neutron dark decays modify the equation of state and decrease Urca bulk viscosity by at most a factor of two to three in neutron star mergers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates the impact of a hypothetical dark decay channel for neutrons, where they decay into a dark baryon and a dark scalar, on the transport properties of matter in neutron star mergers. The authors show that the decay rate remains slow in the dense medium, leading the dark baryons to alter the equation of state such that the bulk viscosity from modified Urca processes is reduced by no more than a factor of two or three. A faster decay rate would instead boost the bulk viscosity at the temperatures of tens of MeV typical in mergers. This enhancement could damp oscillations rapidly, serving as an observable effect of the dark sector in merger events.

Core claim

The neutron dark decay rate in medium is quite slow, and thus the dark baryons modify the dense matter equation of state in a way that decreases the Urca bulk viscosity by, at most, a factor of 2-3. However, if the neutron dark decay was to occur more rapidly, then the bulk viscosity at merger temperatures of tens of MeV would be strongly enhanced, potentially rapidly damping oscillations in merger environments.

What carries the argument

The in-medium neutron dark decay rate derived from vacuum mixing parameters and the dense-matter environment, which competes with weak interaction rates to determine the equilibration timescale in bulk viscosity calculations.

If this is right

  • The presence of dark baryons alters the equation of state and reduces Urca bulk viscosity by at most a factor of two to three.
  • At merger temperatures of tens of MeV the bulk viscosity is still set primarily by standard weak processes under the slow decay assumption.
  • A more rapid neutron dark decay would strongly enhance bulk viscosity and damp oscillations in the merger remnant.
  • This effect could serve as a signature of slowly equilibrating matter in neutron star merger environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Gravitational wave signals from mergers might indirectly constrain the neutron dark decay rate through observed damping timescales.
  • The same slow decay assumption could influence other transport coefficients such as shear viscosity or thermal conductivity in dense matter.
  • Further model extensions that include temperature-dependent mixing effects might alter the predicted viscosity changes.

Load-bearing premise

The neutron dark decay rate in the dense matter environment remains slow enough that it does not dominate the equilibration processes governing bulk viscosity.

What would settle it

An observation that bulk viscosity in neutron star mergers is reduced by more than a factor of three at relevant densities, or strong damping of oscillations at temperatures of tens of MeV, would indicate whether the slow in-medium decay rate holds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.25838 by C.J. Horowitz, Steven P. Harris.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Mass-radius curve of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Particle fractions in beta equilibrium for self-repulsion strengths of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Bulk viscosity of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Peak value (across all temperatures) of the Urca bulk viscosity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Kinematic suppression factors of neutron decays. Note the different y-axis scales. The calculations in these plots are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The NWA rate integrand Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows that the Urca rate rises monotonically with temperature, reaching resonance (1 kHz) at tem￾peratures of 4-5 MeV. Including dark baryons in the EoS has little effect on the Urca rate. This was evident in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: roughly consistent with previous estimates, and without the influence of the neutron dark decay rate, the damp￾ing time rises rapidly at higher temperatures, and bulk viscosity becomes essentially unable to damp oscillations out in any reasonably timescale. However, neutron dark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Peak value (across all temperatures) of the dark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The existence of a dark baryon that mixes with the neutron leads to the possibility of neutron decay into a dark sector. Such dark decays have been studied as possibly relevant for the neutron decay anomaly and for their potential impacts on neutron stars. The most popular formulation is a dark sector consisting of a dark baryon $\chi$ and a dark scalar $\phi$, where a neutron in vacuum decays 1% or less of the time via the channel $n\rightarrow \chi+\phi$. In this work, we consider the effect of this additional neutron decay channel on transport in neutrons star mergers. We find that the neutron dark decay rate in medium is quite slow, and thus the dark baryons modify the dense matter equation of state in a way that decreases the Urca bulk viscosity by, at most, a factor of 2-3. However, if the neutron dark decay was to occur more rapidly, then the bulk viscosity at merger temperatures of tens of MeV would be strongly enhanced, potentially rapidly damping oscillations in merger environments and therefore providing a signature of slowly equilibrating matter in the merger.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores the effects of a hypothetical dark decay channel for neutrons (n → χ + φ) on the equation of state and bulk viscosity in neutron star matter, particularly in the context of mergers. The authors conclude that the in-medium neutron dark decay rate is slow, leading to a modification of the dense matter EOS that decreases the Urca bulk viscosity by at most a factor of 2-3. They further note that a more rapid dark decay could strongly enhance the bulk viscosity at temperatures of tens of MeV, potentially damping oscillations in merger environments.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper provides a link between dark baryon models and observable effects in neutron star mergers through altered transport. A key strength is the use of the vacuum branching ratio without introducing additional free parameters in the derivation, allowing for a parameter-free assessment of the viscosity modification. This could offer a potential signature of slowly equilibrating matter if the fast-decay scenario applies.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (8)] The in-medium decay rate Γ(n→χφ) is computed from the vacuum mixing parameters and dense-matter kinematics. However, this does not account for possible density-dependent mass of the dark scalar φ or additional couplings from nucleon loops at merger densities ~2–5ρ_sat, which could enhance the rate and push it above the Urca timescale, undermining the slow-rate assumption central to the EOS modification and viscosity suppression claim.
  2. [Section 5, Figure 4] The reported factor-of-2-3 suppression of the Urca bulk viscosity is given as an upper bound, but the text does not quantify the exact temperature and density dependence of this reduction. This makes it difficult to assess the robustness of the cross-period or cross-temperature claims for merger conditions.
  3. [Section 4.1] The transition criterion between the slow and fast dark decay regimes is not explicitly compared to the Urca equilibration rate as a function of temperature, leaving the boundary for when the viscosity enhancement occurs unclear.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could more clearly state the range of temperatures considered for the enhanced viscosity scenario.
  2. [Notation] The definition of the dark baryon mixing angle is introduced without a dedicated equation number, making cross-references in later sections cumbersome.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below, providing clarifications on our assumptions and indicating where revisions will be made to improve the presentation of the results on dark neutron decays and bulk viscosity.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Section 3.2, Eq. (8)] The in-medium decay rate Γ(n→χφ) is computed from the vacuum mixing parameters and dense-matter kinematics. However, this does not account for possible density-dependent mass of the dark scalar φ or additional couplings from nucleon loops at merger densities ~2–5ρ_sat, which could enhance the rate and push it above the Urca timescale, undermining the slow-rate assumption central to the EOS modification and viscosity suppression claim.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee raising this consideration. Our calculation of the in-medium rate in Section 3.2 and Eq. (8) deliberately employs the vacuum mixing parameters together with dense-matter kinematics, consistent with the parameter-free approach based on the observed vacuum branching ratio. This provides a baseline assessment without introducing new free parameters. We acknowledge that density-dependent mass shifts for φ or additional nucleon-loop couplings at 2–5ρ_sat could in principle increase the rate. Such effects, however, would require specific beyond-vacuum model assumptions. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion of this limitation, clarifying that our slow-rate conclusion and the associated EOS modification apply to the minimal, vacuum-constrained case. This does not undermine the central claims but improves transparency regarding the scope of the result. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Section 5, Figure 4] The reported factor-of-2-3 suppression of the Urca bulk viscosity is given as an upper bound, but the text does not quantify the exact temperature and density dependence of this reduction. This makes it difficult to assess the robustness of the cross-period or cross-temperature claims for merger conditions.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the text presents the factor-of-2-3 suppression primarily as an upper bound without a detailed breakdown of its temperature and density dependence. In the revised manuscript we will expand the discussion of Figure 4 to include explicit quantification of the suppression factor as a function of temperature and density, for example by adding representative curves or tabulated values at selected merger-relevant conditions. This will allow readers to more readily evaluate the robustness of the viscosity modification across the relevant parameter space. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Section 4.1] The transition criterion between the slow and fast dark decay regimes is not explicitly compared to the Urca equilibration rate as a function of temperature, leaving the boundary for when the viscosity enhancement occurs unclear.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit comparison of the slow-to-fast transition criterion with the Urca equilibration rate versus temperature would clarify the regime boundaries. In the revised version of Section 4.1 we will add a direct comparison, including a plot or analytic estimate showing the temperature at which the dark decay rate exceeds the Urca rate, thereby delineating the onset of the strong viscosity enhancement at merger temperatures of tens of MeV. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper applies vacuum mixing parameters to compute the in-medium neutron dark decay rate Γ(n→χφ), then uses the resulting slow rate to modify the dense-matter EOS and evaluate its effect on Urca bulk viscosity. This chain relies on standard nuclear transport calculations and kinematics without fitted parameters renamed as predictions, without self-definitional loops, and without load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to unverified prior work by the same authors. The explicit assumption that the rate stays slow enough not to dominate equilibration is stated as an input rather than derived from the viscosity result. The derivation therefore remains independent of its own outputs and is consistent with external benchmarks such as vacuum branching ratios and conventional Urca timescales.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim depends on the standard nuclear-physics treatment of Urca processes, the vacuum mixing parameters for the dark decay, and the assumption that the dark sector does not introduce new equilibration channels beyond the stated decay.

free parameters (1)
  • vacuum branching ratio for n to chi plus phi
    Taken as 1 percent or less from prior neutron-lifetime studies; used to set the in-medium rate scale.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Urca processes dominate bulk viscosity in the absence of the dark channel.
    Invoked when stating that the dark decay modifies the usual Urca viscosity.
  • domain assumption Dense-matter environment does not strongly enhance or suppress the dark decay rate beyond the modeled correction.
    Required for the conclusion that the rate remains slow.
invented entities (2)
  • dark baryon chi no independent evidence
    purpose: Particle that mixes with the neutron and participates in the decay channel.
    Postulated to explain possible neutron lifetime anomaly and to alter the equation of state.
  • dark scalar phi no independent evidence
    purpose: Light particle emitted in the neutron dark decay.
    Required to conserve energy and momentum in the decay n to chi plus phi.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5725 in / 1620 out tokens · 33623 ms · 2026-05-18T12:41:05.987733+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 150 canonical work pages · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Urca rate Traditionally, the Urca rate is decomposed into direct and modified Urca processes. The direct Urca neutron decay rate is given by the phase space integral Γ = Z d3pn (2π)3 d3pp (2π)3 d3pe (2π)3 d3p¯νe (2π)3 (2π)4δ4(pn −p p −p e −p ¯νe) × P spins |M|2 24E∗nE∗p EeE¯νe fn(1−f p)(1−f e),(44) wherefdenotes the Fermi-Dirac distribution. The ma- trix ...

  2. [2]

    modified

    Neutron dark decay rate The rate of the “direct” neutron dark decay process n→χϕis given by the phase space integral Γdirect n→χϕ = Z d3pn (2π)3 d3pχ (2π)3 d3pϕ (2π)3 (2π)4δ4(pn −p χ −p ϕ) × P spins |M|2 23E∗nE∗χEϕ fn(1−f χ),(48) where the spin-summed matrix element is X spins |M|2 = 4g2 ϕ (˜pn ·˜pχ +m ∗mχ).(49) There is no Bose factor for theϕ, because t...

  3. [3]

    - which leads to the following formula for calculating rates within the NWA approximation. If the rate of the directn→χ+ϕprocess is Γ direct n→χϕ (which is a function of, among other things,m ∗ andm χ) and we assume that the neutron andχhave widthsW n andW χ, respectively, (theϕis assumed not to have a width), then the rate of 13 that process in the nucle...

  4. [4]

    threshold

    usedW≈T 2/(5 MeV) which comes from the cal- culation in [133]. Here, we need both the neutron andχ widths, and theχwidth will be a function of the param- eterG ′. To calculate the neutron width, we calculate the inverse mean free math of the neutron due to the elastic scattering processn+n→n+n. We assume that the neu- trons exchange either a sigma or an o...

  5. [5]

    This choice of coordinates gives 8π 2 from three trivial angular integrals

    Neutron direct dark decay rate The rate ofn→χ+ϕis Γdirect n→χϕ = Z d3pn (2π)3 d3pχ (2π)3 d3pϕ (2π)3 (2π)4δ4(pn −p χ −p ϕ) P spins |M|2 23E∗nE∗χEϕ fn(1−f χ) (A1) where the spin-summed matrix element is X spins |M|2 = 4g2 ϕ (˜pn ·˜pχ +m ∗mχ).(A2) Integrating overp ϕ with the three-dimensional delta function gives Γdirect n→χϕ = g2 ϕ 64π5 Z d3pn d3pχ δ En −E...

  6. [6]

    modified

    Neutron “modified” dark decay rate:n+n→n+χ+ϕ The neutron can also decay to aχand aϕ, but after first interacting with another neutron via the strong interaction. There are two Feynman diagrams for this process, as the identical neutrons can be interchanged in the initial state. In the calculation, thenχϕvertex isig ϕ, and the strong interaction is modeled...

  7. [7]

    modified

    Neutron “modified” dark decay rate:n+χ→χ+χ+ϕ The neutron can decay to aχand aϕ, but where theχis off-shell, and then scatters with anotherχto bring it back on-shell. There are two Feynman diagrams for this process, as the identical dark baryonsχcan be interchanged in the final state. The dark baryonsχare assumed to interact repulsively by exchanging a dar...

  8. [8]

    F. E. Wietfeldt and G. L. Greene, Colloquium: The neutron lifetime, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1173 (2011)

  9. [9]

    F. E. Wietfeldt, Measurements of the Neutron Lifetime, Atoms6, 70 (2018)

  10. [10]

    The neutron and its role in cosmology and particle physics

    D. Dubbers and M. G. Schmidt, The Neutron and Its Role in Cosmology and Particle Physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1111 (2011), arXiv:1105.3694 [hep-ph]

  11. [11]

    Fornal, Neutron Dark Decay, Universe9, 449 (2023), arXiv:2306.11349 [hep-ph]

    B. Fornal, Neutron Dark Decay, Universe9, 449 (2023), arXiv:2306.11349 [hep-ph]

  12. [12]

    Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly

    B. Fornal and B. Grinstein, Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 191801 (2018), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 219901 (2020)], arXiv:1801.01124 [hep-ph]

  13. [13]

    J. M. Cline and J. M. Cornell, Dark decay of the neu- tron, JHEP07, 081, arXiv:1803.04961 [hep-ph]

  14. [14]

    Strumia, Dark Matter interpretation of the neutron decay anomaly, JHEP02, 067, arXiv:2112.09111 [hep- ph]

    A. Strumia, Dark Matter interpretation of the neutron decay anomaly, JHEP02, 067, arXiv:2112.09111 [hep- ph]

  15. [15]

    Search for the Neutron Decay n$\rightarrow$ X+$\gamma$ where X is a dark matter particle

    Z. Tanget al., Search for the Neutron Decay n→X+γ where X is a dark matter particle, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 022505 (2018), arXiv:1802.01595 [nucl-ex]

  16. [16]

    Search for dark matter decay of the free neutron from the UCNA experiment: n $\rightarrow \chi + e^+e^-$

    X. Sunet al.(UCNA), Search for dark matter de- cay of the free neutron from the UCNA experiment: n→χ+e +e−, Phys. Rev. C97, 052501 (2018), arXiv:1803.10890 [nucl-ex]

  17. [17]

    Neutron stars exclude light dark baryons

    D. McKeen, A. E. Nelson, S. Reddy, and D. Zhou, Neu- tron stars exclude light dark baryons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 061802 (2018), arXiv:1802.08244 [hep-ph]. 25

  18. [18]

    T. F. Motta, P. A. M. Guichon, and A. W. Thomas, Neutron to Dark Matter Decay in Neutron Stars, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33, 1844020 (2018), arXiv:1806.00903 [nucl-th]

  19. [19]

    T. F. Motta, P. A. M. Guichon, and A. W. Thomas, Im- plications of Neutron Star Properties for the Existence of Light Dark Matter, J. Phys. G45, 05LT01 (2018), arXiv:1802.08427 [nucl-th]

  20. [20]

    G. Baym, D. H. Beck, P. Geltenbort, and J. Shelton, Testing dark decays of baryons in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 061801 (2018), arXiv:1802.08282 [hep- ph]

  21. [21]

    Grinstein, C

    B. Grinstein, C. Kouvaris, and N. G. Nielsen, Neutron Star Stability in Light of the Neutron Decay Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 091601 (2019), arXiv:1811.06546 [hep-ph]

  22. [22]

    M. I. Gresham and K. M. Zurek, Asymmetric Dark Stars and Neutron Star Stability, Phys. Rev. D99, 083008 (2019), arXiv:1809.08254 [astro-ph.CO]

  23. [23]

    Husain, T

    W. Husain, T. F. Motta, and A. W. Thomas, Conse- quences of neutron decay inside neutron stars, JCAP 10, 028, arXiv:2203.02758 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Husain, D

    W. Husain, D. Sengupta, and A. W. Thomas, Con- straining Dark Boson Decay Using Neutron Stars, Uni- verse9, 307 (2023), arXiv:2306.07509 [hep-ph]

  25. [25]

    Shirke, S

    S. Shirke, S. Ghosh, D. Chatterjee, L. Sagunski, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, R-modes as a new probe of dark matter in neutron stars, JCAP12, 008, arXiv:2305.05664 [astro-ph.HE]

  26. [26]

    Routaray, A

    P. Routaray, A. Chakrawarty, N. K. Patra, and B. Ku- mar, Decoding dark matter admixed neutron stars: From static structure to rotational deformation, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102093 (2025), arXiv:2409.02131 [astro- ph.HE]

  27. [27]

    Bastero-Gil, T

    M. Bastero-Gil, T. Huertas-Roldan, and D. Santos, Neu- tron decay anomaly, neutron stars, and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D110, 083003 (2024), arXiv:2403.08666 [astro-ph.CO]

  28. [28]

    H. C. Das and G. F. Burgio, Neutron Decay Anomaly and Its Effects on Neutron Star Properties, Universe11, 159 (2025), arXiv:2505.09190 [astro-ph.HE]

  29. [29]

    Shirke, B

    S. Shirke, B. K. Pradhan, D. Chatterjee, L. Sagunski, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Effects of dark matter on f- mode oscillations of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D110, 063025 (2024), arXiv:2403.18740 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Divaris and C

    M. Divaris and C. C. Moustakidis, Neutron Dark Decay in Neutron Stars: The Role of the Symmetry Energy, (2025), arXiv:2508.21754 [nucl-th]

  31. [31]

    Dark Matter Effects On Neutron Star Properties

    J. Ellis, G. H¨ utsi, K. Kannike, L. Marzola, M. Raidal, and V. Vaskonen, Dark Matter Effects On Neutron Star Properties, Phys. Rev. D97, 123007 (2018), arXiv:1804.01418 [astro-ph.CO]

  32. [32]

    J. M. Berryman, S. Gardner, and M. Zakeri, Neutron Stars with Baryon Number Violation, Probing Dark Sectors, Symmetry14, 518 (2022), arXiv:2201.02637 [hep-ph]

  33. [33]

    The dark matter effect on realistic equation of state in neutron stars

    G. Panotopoulos and I. Lopes, Dark matter effect on realistic equation of state in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D96, 083004 (2017), arXiv:1709.06312 [hep-ph]

  34. [34]

    A. Das, T. Malik, and A. C. Nayak, Confronting nu- clear equation of state in the presence of dark mat- ter using GW170817 observation in relativistic mean field theory approach, Phys. Rev. D99, 043016 (2019), arXiv:1807.10013 [hep-ph]

  35. [35]

    Issifu, P

    A. Issifu, P. Thakur, F. M. da Silva, K. D. Mar- quez, D. P. Menezes, M. Dutra, O. Louren¸ co, and T. Frederico, Supernova remnants with mirror dark matter and hyperons, Phys. Rev. D111, 083026 (2025), arXiv:2412.17946 [hep-ph]

  36. [36]

    Liu, J.-B

    H.-M. Liu, J.-B. Wei, Z.-H. Li, G. F. Burgio, H. C. Das, and H. J. Schulze, Dark matter effects on the properties of neutron stars: Compactness and tidal deformabil- ity, Phys. Rev. D110, 023024 (2024), arXiv:2403.17024 [nucl-th]

  37. [37]

    D. A. Caballero, J. L. Ripley, and N. Yunes, Radial mode stability of two-fluid neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103038 (2024), arXiv:2408.04701 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Kumar, S

    A. Kumar, S. Girmohanta, and H. Sotani, Multi- Messenger and Cosmological Constraints on Dark Mat- ter through Two-Fluid Neutron Star Modeling, (2025), arXiv:2501.16829 [astro-ph.HE]

  39. [39]

    Thakur, T

    P. Thakur, T. Malik, A. Das, T. K. Jha, and C. Providˆ encia, Exploring robust correlations between fermionic dark matter model parameters and neutron star properties: A two-fluid perspective, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043030 (2024), arXiv:2308.00650 [hep-ph]

  40. [40]

    ´Avila, E

    A. ´Avila, E. Giangrandi, V. Sagun, O. Ivanytskyi, and C. Providˆ encia, Rapid neutron star cooling triggered by dark matter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528, 6319 (2024), arXiv:2309.03894 [astro-ph.HE]

  41. [41]

    Giangrandi, H

    E. Giangrandi, H. Rueter, N. Kunert, M. Emma, A. Abac, A. Adhikari, T. Dietrich, V. Sagun, W. Tichy, and C. Providencia, Numerical Relativity Simulations of Dark Matter Admixed Binary Neutron Stars, (2025), arXiv:2504.20825 [astro-ph.HE]

  42. [42]

    Giangrandi, V

    E. Giangrandi, V. Sagun, O. Ivanytskyi, C. Providˆ encia, and T. Dietrich, The Effects of Self-interacting Bosonic Dark Matter on Neutron Star Properties, Astrophys. J. 953, 115 (2023), arXiv:2209.10905 [astro-ph.HE]

  43. [43]

    Koehn, E

    H. Koehn, E. Giangrandi, N. Kunert, R. Somasun- daram, V. Sagun, and T. Dietrich, Impact of dark mat- ter on tidal signatures in neutron star mergers with the Einstein Telescope, Phys. Rev. D110, 103033 (2024), arXiv:2408.14711 [astro-ph.HE]

  44. [44]

    Search for Dark Matter Effects on Gravitational Signals from Neutron Star Mergers

    J. Ellis, A. Hektor, G. H¨ utsi, K. Kannike, L. Marzola, M. Raidal, and V. Vaskonen, Search for Dark Matter Ef- fects on Gravitational Signals from Neutron Star Merg- ers, Phys. Lett. B781, 607 (2018), arXiv:1710.05540 [astro-ph.CO]

  45. [45]

    M. Emma, F. Schianchi, F. Pannarale, V. Sagun, and T. Dietrich, Numerical Simulations of Dark Matter Ad- mixed Neutron Star Binaries, Particles5, 273 (2022), arXiv:2206.10887 [gr-qc]

  46. [46]

    Sotani and A

    H. Sotani and A. Kumar, Emergence of new oscillation modes in dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D111, 123013 (2025), arXiv:2505.18800 [astro- ph.HE]

  47. [47]

    Kain, Dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys

    B. Kain, Dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D103, 043009 (2021), arXiv:2102.08257 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    Gleason, B

    T. Gleason, B. Brown, and B. Kain, Dynamical evolu- tion of dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D105, 023010 (2022), arXiv:2201.02274 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    Cronin, X

    J. Cronin, X. Zhang, and B. Kain, Rotating dark mat- ter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D108, 103016 (2023), arXiv:2311.07714 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]

    Hajkarim, J

    F. Hajkarim, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and L. Tolos, Ther- modynamic consistent description of compact stars 26 of two interacting fluids: the case of neutron stars with Higgs portal dark matter, JCAP08, 070, arXiv:2412.04585 [hep-ph]

  51. [51]

    Shawqi, A

    S. Shawqi, A. Konstantinou, and S. M. Morsink, Ro- tating Neutron Stars with Dark Matter Halos, (2025), arXiv:2508.18434 [astro-ph.HE]

  52. [52]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and E. Vitagliano, Self-Interacting Dark Sectors in Supernovae Can Behave as a Rela- tivistic Fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 251004 (2024), arXiv:2404.07714 [hep-ph]

  53. [53]

    D. G. Yakovlev, A. D. Kaminker, O. Y. Gnedin, and P. Haensel, Neutrino emission from neutron stars, Phys. Rept.354, 1 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0012122

  54. [54]

    S. P. Harris, Bulk Viscosity in Dense Nuclear Matter, inNuclear Theory in the Age of Multimessenger Astron- omy(CRC Press, 2024) arXiv:2407.16157 [nucl-th]

  55. [55]

    Reaction rates and transport in neutron stars

    A. Schmitt and P. Shternin, Reaction rates and trans- port in neutron stars, Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr.457, 455 (2018), arXiv:1711.06520 [astro-ph.HE]

  56. [56]

    Finzi and R

    A. Finzi and R. A. Wolf, Hot, Vibrating Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J.153, 835 (1968)

  57. [57]

    R. F. Sawyer, Bulk viscosity of hot neutron-star matter and the maximum rotation rates of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D39, 3804 (1989)

  58. [58]

    Haensel and R

    P. Haensel and R. Schaeffer, Bulk viscosity of hot- neutron-star matter from direct URCA processes, Phys. Rev. D45, 4708 (1992)

  59. [59]

    Bulk viscosity in superfluid neutron star cores. I. Direct Urca processes in npe\mu matter

    P. Haensel, K. P. Levenfish, and D. G. Yakovlev, Bulk viscosity in superfluid neutron star cores. I. direct urca processes in npe mu matter, Astron. Astrophys.357, 1157 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0004183

  60. [60]

    Bulk viscosity in superfluid neutron star cores. II. Modified Urca processes in $npe\mu$ matter

    P. Haensel, K. P. Levenfish, and D. G. Yakovlev, Bulk viscosity in superfluid neutron star cores. 2. Modified Urca processes in npe mu matter, Astron. Astrophys. 327, 130 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0103290

  61. [61]

    M. E. Gusakov, Bulk viscosity of superfluid neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D76, 083001 (2007), arXiv:0704.1071 [astro-ph]

  62. [62]

    M. G. Alford, S. Mahmoodifar, and K. Schwenzer, Large amplitude behavior of the bulk viscosity of dense mat- ter, J. Phys. G37, 125202 (2010), arXiv:1005.3769 [nucl-th]

  63. [63]

    Cutler, L

    C. Cutler, L. Lindblom, and R. J. Splinter, Damping Times for Neutron Star Oscillations, Astrophys. J.363, 603 (1990)

  64. [64]

    M. E. Gusakov, D. G. Yakovlev, and O. Y. Gnedin, Thermal evolution of a pulsating neutron star, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.361, 1415 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0502583

  65. [65]

    Andersson and B

    N. Andersson and B. Haskell, Neutron Star Asteroseis- mology: Beyond the Mass-Radius Curve, inNuclear Theory in the Age of Multimessenger Astronomy(CRC Press, 2024)

  66. [66]

    Andersson, K

    N. Andersson, K. D. Kokkotas, and B. F. Schutz, Grav- itational radiation limit on the spin of young neu- tron stars, Astrophys. J.510, 846 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9805225

  67. [67]

    Viscous damping of r-modes: Small amplitude instability

    M. Alford, S. Mahmoodifar, and K. Schwenzer, Vis- cous damping of r-modes: Small amplitude instability, Phys. Rev. D85, 024007 (2012), arXiv:1012.4883 [astro- ph.HE]

  68. [68]

    M. G. Alford, S. Mahmoodifar, and K. Schwenzer, Vis- cous damping of r-modes: Large amplitude saturation, Phys. Rev. D85, 044051 (2012), arXiv:1103.3521 [astro- ph.HE]

  69. [69]

    B. A. Sa’d, I. A. Shovkovy, and D. H. Rischke, Bulk vis- cosity of strange quark matter: Urca versus non-leptonic processes, Phys. Rev. D75, 125004 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0703016

  70. [70]

    M. G. Alford and A. Schmitt, Bulk viscosity in 2SC quark matter, J. Phys. G34, 67 (2007), arXiv:nucl- th/0608019

  71. [71]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  72. [72]

    Perego, S

    A. Perego, S. Bernuzzi, and D. Radice, Thermodynam- ics conditions of matter in neutron star mergers, Eur. Phys. J. A55, 124 (2019), arXiv:1903.07898 [gr-qc]

  73. [73]

    Hammond, I

    P. Hammond, I. Hawke, and N. Andersson, Thermal as- pects of neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D104, 103006 (2021), arXiv:2108.08649 [astro-ph.HE]

  74. [74]

    Fields, A

    J. Fields, A. Prakash, M. Breschi, D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, and A. da Silva Schneider, Thermal Effects in Binary Neutron Star Mergers, Astrophys. J. Lett. 952, L36 (2023), arXiv:2302.11359 [astro-ph.HE]

  75. [75]

    Hanauske, J

    M. Hanauske, J. Steinheimer, A. Motornenko, V. Vovchenko, L. Bovard, E. R. Most, L. J. Papen- fort, S. Schramm, and H. St¨ ocker, Neutron star mergers: Probing the eos of hot, dense matter by gravitational waves, Particles2, 44 (2019)

  76. [76]

    M. G. Alford, L. Bovard, M. Hanauske, L. Rezzolla, and K. Schwenzer, Viscous Dissipation and Heat Conduction in Binary Neutron-Star Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 041101 (2018), arXiv:1707.09475 [gr-qc]

  77. [77]

    M. G. Alford and S. P. Harris, Damping of density os- cillations in neutrino-transparent nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C100, 035803 (2019), arXiv:1907.03795 [nucl-th]

  78. [78]

    M. G. Alford, A. Haber, and Z. Zhang, Isospin equi- libration in neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. C109, 055803 (2024), arXiv:2306.06180 [nucl-th]

  79. [79]

    Alford, A

    M. Alford, A. Harutyunyan, and A. Sedrakian, Bulk vis- cosity of baryonic matter with trapped neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D100, 103021 (2019), arXiv:1907.04192 [astro- ph.HE]

  80. [80]

    Alford, A

    M. Alford, A. Harutyunyan, and A. Sedrakian, Bulk viscosity from Urca processes: npeµmatter in the neutrino-trapped regime, Phys. Rev. D104, 103027 (2021), arXiv:2108.07523 [astro-ph.HE]

Showing first 80 references.