pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.07467 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-08 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-ph· hep-th

Weakly turbulent saturation of the nonlinear scalar ergoregion instability

Nils Siemonsen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-phhep-th
keywords ergoregion instabilityweak turbulencedirect cascadeultracompact objectsscalar self-interactionsnonlinear saturationgravitational waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

The ergoregion instability saturates by driving a weakly turbulent direct cascade that shifts energy to small scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper evolves scalar fields on a horizonless spinning ultracompact background in theories whose self-interactions are chosen to mimic the nonlinear structure of Einstein gravity. It finds that the linear instability does not run away; instead, nonlinear couplings rapidly trigger a direct cascade that moves energy from the dominant large-scale modes into a spectrum of smaller-scale modes. Because the nonlinear timescales are orders of magnitude shorter than the linear growth times, saturation occurs quickly and populates the counter-rotating stable light ring with higher azimuthal harmonics arranged in a ring-like configuration. The authors conclude that the same turbulent mechanism is likely to operate in the fully gravitational case and will therefore leave observable traces in the gravitational-wave signal.

Core claim

Time-domain simulations show that the ergoregion instability saturates through a weakly turbulent direct cascade. Energy is transferred from the most unstable, large-scale modes to small scales on timescales much shorter than the linear e-folding times, filling the stable light ring with a broad spectrum of higher-order azimuthal modes that form a ring-like structure.

What carries the argument

The weakly turbulent direct cascade that moves energy from large-scale unstable modes to small scales on nonlinear timescales orders of magnitude shorter than linear growth times.

If this is right

  • Saturation occurs rapidly once nonlinear couplings become active.
  • The stable light ring ends up filled with a continuous spectrum of azimuthal modes rather than a single dominant mode.
  • Turbulent cascades are expected to operate during the fully gravitational saturation of the instability.
  • Gravitational-wave signals from such objects should carry spectral signatures of the small-scale energy distribution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cascade mechanism may appear in other superradiant or ergoregion instabilities around compact objects.
  • Gravitational-wave observatories could distinguish saturated turbulent states from purely linear growth by the presence of a broader frequency spectrum.
  • Extending the scalar model to include back-reaction on the metric would test whether the cascade survives in the dynamical spacetime.

Load-bearing premise

Scalar theories with potential-type and derivative self-interactions capture enough of the nonlinear structure of the Einstein equations to determine how the ergoregion instability saturates.

What would settle it

A numerical-relativity evolution in full Einstein gravity that shows continued exponential growth without energy transfer to small scales via a direct cascade would falsify the saturation mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.07467 by Nils Siemonsen.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The spectrum of linear energies Eℓℓ at various times during the evolution shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: First, this confirms the weakly nonlinear nature of the turbulent cascade, since Eint ≪ Elin. Secondly, self-interactions bound the energy in the most unstable mode, |E11|, from above, while the ergoregion instability effectively bounds it from below. This, together with the energy transport mechanism to smaller scales, implies a on long timescales constant (negative) energy injection rate into the ℓ = m =… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (left) The quantity D 6ℓℓ′ ℓ ′′ 6ℓℓ′ℓ ′′ plotted over the index space (ℓ, ℓ′ , ℓ′′) up to a maximum mode number of ℓ, ℓ′ , ℓ′′ ≤ 20. Color indicates its value. For clarity, when the coupling coefficients vanish, we remove the dots. While the value of E 6ℓℓ′ ℓ ′′ 6ℓℓ′ℓ ′′ differs slightly, they are qualitatively similar. (center and right) The coupling coefficients at fixed ¯m = m = m′ = m′′ = 1, i.e., D 11… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The evolution of the linear energies Eℓm through the ergoregion instability (of the ℓ = m = 1 mode) and sub￾sequent saturation, when considering only couplings with az￾imuthal index m = 1, but (potentially large) polar modes ℓ ≥ 1. Here, ℓmax = 1, 5, 13 indicates three different numer￾ical evolutions, which include polar modes only up to (and including) ℓmax. Recall, only a finite number of energies Eℓm ca… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of three select linear energies (different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Evolution of the higher-order polar modes (assum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The dynamics of ϕ11 from ingoing Gaussian-pulse initial data (top panel). The evolution of the corresponding energy conservation violations (bottom panel) for different reference grid spacing h of the scalar evolution scheme, as well as h¯ of the background’s metric functions. solution is limited by the methods introduced in Ref. [49], so that for sufficiently high resolution of the scalar evo￾lution sche… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform time-domain evolutions of the ergoregion instability on a horizonless spinning ultracompact spacetime in scalar theories with potential-type and derivative self-interactions mimicking the nonlinear structure of the Einstein equations. We find that the instability saturates by triggering a weakly turbulent direct cascade, which transfers energy from the most unstable and large-scale modes to small scales. The cascade's nonlinear timescales of each mode are orders of magnitude shorter than the corresponding linear e-folding times. Through this mechanism, the counter-rotating stable light ring is filled with a spectrum of higher-order azimuthal modes forming a ring-like shape. Thereby we demonstrate that turbulent processes are likely also important during the fully gravitational saturation of the instability, leaving imprints in the gravitational wave emission.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports time-domain numerical evolutions of a nonlinear scalar field with potential-type and derivative self-interactions on a fixed horizonless spinning ultracompact background. It claims that the ergoregion instability saturates through a weakly turbulent direct cascade that transfers energy from the most unstable large-scale modes to small scales, with the nonlinear timescales of each mode being orders of magnitude shorter than the corresponding linear e-folding times. This process fills the counter-rotating stable light ring with a spectrum of higher-order azimuthal modes, and the authors conclude that turbulent processes are likely important for the saturation of the instability in the fully gravitational case as well.

Significance. If the central numerical results hold, the work is significant for providing a concrete dynamical mechanism—weak turbulence—for saturating the ergoregion instability in a controlled scalar model. The direct simulation approach yields a clear timescale separation and mode cascade that could inform expectations for gravitational-wave signatures from ultracompact objects, extending beyond linear analyses of superradiant instabilities.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] §4 (Results on saturation), paragraph on timescale extraction: the central claim that nonlinear timescales are 'orders of magnitude shorter' than linear e-folding times is load-bearing for the weakly turbulent interpretation, yet the manuscript provides no explicit description of how these timescales are measured from the simulation data (e.g., via energy transfer rates, mode amplitude fits, or spectral analysis), nor any convergence or error estimates on the reported separation.
  2. [Introduction and §5] Introduction and §5 (Discussion of gravitational implications): the assertion that the chosen scalar self-interactions 'sufficiently mimic the nonlinear structure of the Einstein equations' to imply relevance for the gravitational saturation is load-bearing for the final claim, but the paper does not identify which specific cubic or higher-order terms from the Einstein-Hilbert action are reproduced versus omitted, nor does it test sensitivity to additional channels such as metric backreaction or tensor-scalar couplings.
  3. [§3] §3 (Numerical methods): the evolutions rely on a fixed background with no apparent convergence tests, resolution studies, or dissipation analysis reported; without these, it is difficult to confirm that the observed direct cascade to high azimuthal numbers is not influenced by numerical artifacts at small scales.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure 3 (or equivalent showing the ring-like structure): the color scale and mode decomposition should be clarified to make the energy distribution across azimuthal numbers more quantitatively readable.
  2. [§2] Notation for the self-interaction terms in §2: the potential and derivative couplings are introduced without a compact summary table comparing them to the leading nonlinearities expected from GR perturbation theory.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive report. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity, documentation, and validation of the results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (Results on saturation), paragraph on timescale extraction: the central claim that nonlinear timescales are 'orders of magnitude shorter' than linear e-folding times is load-bearing for the weakly turbulent interpretation, yet the manuscript provides no explicit description of how these timescales are measured from the simulation data (e.g., via energy transfer rates, mode amplitude fits, or spectral analysis), nor any convergence or error estimates on the reported separation.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit description of the timescale extraction procedure is required. In the revised manuscript we will add a paragraph in §4 explaining that the nonlinear timescales are obtained by fitting the early-time exponential growth of individual azimuthal mode amplitudes (extracted via azimuthal Fourier decomposition of the scalar field) and by monitoring the rate of energy transfer between modes in the spectral energy density. We will also report convergence of these fits under increased resolution and provide error estimates derived from the residuals of the fits together with a comparison against the linear e-folding times measured in separate linearized simulations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Introduction and §5 (Discussion of gravitational implications): the assertion that the chosen scalar self-interactions 'sufficiently mimic the nonlinear structure of the Einstein equations' to imply relevance for the gravitational saturation is load-bearing for the final claim, but the paper does not identify which specific cubic or higher-order terms from the Einstein-Hilbert action are reproduced versus omitted, nor does it test sensitivity to additional channels such as metric backreaction or tensor-scalar couplings.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current text does not provide a term-by-term comparison. In the revised introduction and §5 we will explicitly list the cubic and quartic potential and derivative couplings retained in our scalar action and contrast them with the leading nonlinear terms that appear when the Einstein-Hilbert action is expanded to the same order in the weak-field limit. We will also add a paragraph discussing the limitations of the fixed-background approximation, noting the absence of metric backreaction and tensor-scalar couplings, and will qualify the gravitational implications accordingly while retaining the qualitative analogy. revision: partial

  3. Referee: §3 (Numerical methods): the evolutions rely on a fixed background with no apparent convergence tests, resolution studies, or dissipation analysis reported; without these, it is difficult to confirm that the observed direct cascade to high azimuthal numbers is not influenced by numerical artifacts at small scales.

    Authors: We agree that additional numerical validation should be documented. In the revised §3 we will insert a new subsection presenting resolution studies at three different grid spacings, demonstrating that the direct cascade to high azimuthal modes and the associated energy spectra converge. We will also include an analysis of numerical dissipation (via monitoring of total energy conservation and artificial viscosity effects) to show that dissipation does not artificially populate the small-scale modes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; result from direct numerical simulation of chosen scalar model

full rationale

The paper obtains its headline result—that the ergoregion instability saturates through a weakly turbulent direct cascade with nonlinear timescales much shorter than linear growth times—via time-domain numerical integration of the scalar field equations on a fixed ultracompact spinning background. The scalar potential and derivative self-interactions are explicitly chosen to mimic the nonlinear structure of the Einstein equations; this modeling assumption is stated up front rather than derived. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no analytical derivation reduces the reported cascade or timescale hierarchy to its own inputs by construction. The simulation output is therefore independent of the circularity patterns enumerated in the guidelines, making the work self-contained against external benchmarks for the stated scalar model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the modeling choice that scalar self-interactions replicate key nonlinear gravitational features; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Scalar theories with potential-type and derivative self-interactions mimic the nonlinear structure of the Einstein equations
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the basis for the chosen models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5648 in / 1138 out tokens · 25957 ms · 2026-05-18T08:58:59.058040+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Axial Oscillations of Viscous Neutron Stars

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Viscous neutron stars have new families of axial oscillation modes without perfect-fluid counterparts, featuring mode avoidance and long-lived modes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. L. Friedman, Commun. Math. Phys.63, 243 (1978)

    work page 1978

  2. [2]

    Vilenkin, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Phys. Lett. B78, 301 (1978)

    work page 1978

  3. [3]

    A proof of Friedman's ergosphere instability for scalar waves

    G. Moschidis, Commun. Math. Phys.358, 437 (2018), arXiv:1608.02035 [math.AP]. 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Keir, Class

    J. Keir, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 135009 (2016), arXiv:1404.7036 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Light rings as observational evidence for event horizons: long-lived modes, ergoregions and nonlinear instabilities of ultracompact objects

    V. Cardoso, L. C. B. Crispino, C. F. B. Macedo, H. Okawa, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D90, 044069 (2014), arXiv:1406.5510 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    P. V. P. Cunha, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, and N. Sanchis-Gual, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 061401 (2023), arXiv:2207.13713 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Evstafyeva, N

    T. Evstafyeva, N. Siemonsen, and W. E. East, (2025), arXiv:2508.11527 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Siemonsen, in prep

    N. Siemonsen, in prep

    work page

  9. [9]

    G. A. Marks, S. J. Staelens, T. Evstafyeva, and U. Sperhake, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 131402 (2025), arXiv:2504.17775 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Siemonsen, Phys

    N. Siemonsen, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 031401 (2024), arXiv:2404.14536 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Benomio, A

    G. Benomio, A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no, F. Pretorius, and A. Sullivan, (2024), arXiv:2411.17445 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Redondo-Yuste and A

    J. Redondo-Yuste and A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no, (2025), arXiv:2502.18643 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Zakharov, V

    V. Zakharov, V. L’vov, and G. Falkovich,Kolmogorov Spectra of Turbulence I: Wave Turbulence, Springer Se- ries in Nonlinear Dynamics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Galtier,Physics of Wave Turbulence(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2022)

    S. Galtier,Physics of Wave Turbulence(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Nazarenko,Wave Turbulence, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011)

    S. Nazarenko,Wave Turbulence, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    On weakly turbulent instability of anti-de Sitter space

    P. Bizon and A. Rostworowski, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 031102 (2011), arXiv:1104.3702 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    A comment on AdS collapse of a scalar field in higher dimensions

    J. Jalmuzna, A. Rostworowski, and P. Bizon, Phys. Rev. D84, 085021 (2011), arXiv:1108.4539 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    Scalar Collapse in AdS

    A. Buchel, L. Lehner, and S. L. Liebling, Phys. Rev. D 86, 123011 (2012), arXiv:1210.0890 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Holographic Thermalization, stability of AdS, and the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam-Tsingou paradox

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Buchel, S. R. Green, L. Lehner, and S. L. Liebling, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 071601 (2014), arXiv:1403.6471 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    S. L. Detweiler, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A352, 381 (1977)

    work page 1977

  21. [21]

    Slow relaxation of rapidly rotating black holes

    S. Hod, Phys. Rev. D78, 084035 (2008), arXiv:0811.3806 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    H. Yang, F. Zhang, A. Zimmerman, D. A. Nichols, E. Berti, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D87, 041502 (2013), arXiv:1212.3271 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    Holographic thermalization, quasinormal modes and superradiance in Kerr-AdS

    V. Cardoso, ´O. J. C. Dias, G. S. Hartnett, L. Lehner, and J. E. Santos, JHEP04, 183 (2014), arXiv:1312.5323 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Quasimodes and a Lower Bound on the Uniform Energy Decay Rate for Kerr-AdS Spacetimes

    G. Holzegel and J. Smulevici, Anal. Part. Diff. Eq.7, 1057 (2014), arXiv:1303.5944 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    H. Yang, A. Zimmerman, and L. Lehner, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 081101 (2015), arXiv:1402.4859 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Iuliano, S

    C. Iuliano, S. Hollands, S. R. Green, and P. Zimmerman, Phys. Rev. D111, 124038 (2025), arXiv:2412.02821 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Figueras and L

    P. Figueras and L. Rossi, JHEP06, 107 (2025), arXiv:2311.14167 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    S. Ma, L. Lehner, H. Yang, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, (2025), arXiv:2508.13294 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Turbulence of Weak Gravitational Waves in the Early Universe

    S. Galtier and S. V. Nazarenko, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 221101 (2017), arXiv:1703.09069 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    Galtier and S

    S. Galtier and S. V. Nazarenko, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 131101 (2021), arXiv:2108.09158 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Benomio, Anal

    G. Benomio, Anal. Part. Diff. Eq.14, 2427 (2021), arXiv:1809.07795 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity

    S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani, JHEP02, 045 (2008), arXiv:0712.2456 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    Turbulent flows for relativistic conformal fluids in 2+1 dimensions

    F. Carrasco, L. Lehner, R. C. Myers, O. Reula, and A. Singh, Phys. Rev. D86, 126006 (2012), arXiv:1210.6702 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    Holographic turbulence

    A. Adams, P. M. Chesler, and H. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 151602 (2014), arXiv:1307.7267 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  35. [35]

    S. R. Green, F. Carrasco, and L. Lehner, Phys. Rev. X 4, 011001 (2014), arXiv:1309.7940 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  36. [36]

    Krynicki, J

    H. Krynicki, J. Wu, and E. R. Most, (2025), arXiv:2509.19769 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Gay and S

    B. Gay and S. Galtier, Phys. Rev. D109, 083531 (2024), arXiv:2402.05614 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Liang, P

    J. Liang, P. Xu, M. Du, Y. Cheng, Z. Wang, and Z. Luo, (2025), arXiv:2510.03711 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Andrade, C

    T. Andrade, C. Pantelidou, J. Sonner, and B. Withers, JHEP07, 063 (2021), arXiv:1912.00032 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Living Rev. Rel.22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Bambiet al.(2025) arXiv:2505.09014 [gr-qc]

    C. Bambiet al.(2025) arXiv:2505.09014 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Carballo-Rubioet al., JCAP05, 003 (2025), arXiv:2501.05505 [gr-qc]

    R. Carballo-Rubioet al., JCAP05, 003 (2025), arXiv:2501.05505 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    The stochastic gravitational-wave background in the absence of horizons

    E. Barausse, R. Brito, V. Cardoso, I. Dvorkin, and P. Pani, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 20LT01 (2018), arXiv:1805.08229 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Mastrogiovanni, E

    S. Mastrogiovanni, E. Maggio, and A. F. Mascioli, (2025), arXiv:2502.07675 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Stochastic gravitational-wave background from spin loss of black holes

    X.-L. Fan and Y.-B. Chen, Phys. Rev. D98, 044020 (2018), arXiv:1712.00784 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Comins and B

    N. Comins and B. F. Schutz, Proc. R. Soc. Lond.364, 10.1098/rspa.1978.0196

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1978.0196 1978

  47. [47]

    J. B. Hartle, Astrophys. J.150, 1005 (1967)

    work page 1967

  48. [48]

    Rotating Boson Stars and Q-Balls

    B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, and M. List, Phys. Rev. D72, 064002 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505143

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  49. [49]

    Siemonsen and W

    N. Siemonsen and W. E. East, Phys. Rev. D103, 044022 (2021), arXiv:2011.08247 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Ergoregion instability of ultra-compact astrophysical objects

    V. Cardoso, P. Pani, M. Cadoni, and M. Cavaglia, Phys. Rev. D77, 124044 (2008), arXiv:0709.0532 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  51. [51]

    John, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics34, 29 (1981), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cpa.3160340103

    F. John, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics34, 29 (1981), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cpa.3160340103

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.3160340103 1981

  52. [52]

    Baryakhtar, M

    M. Baryakhtar, M. Galanis, R. Lasenby, and O. Simon, Phys. Rev. D103, 095019 (2021), arXiv:2011.11646 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Black Hole Superradiance Signatures of Ultralight Vectors

    M. Baryakhtar, R. Lasenby, and M. Teo, Phys. Rev. D 96, 035019 (2017), arXiv:1704.05081 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    T. May, W. E. East, and N. Siemonsen, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044062 (2025), arXiv:2410.21442 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    T. J. Boerner, S. Deems, T. R. Furlani, S. L. Knuth, and J. Towns, inPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2023: Computing for the Common Good, PEARC ’23 (Association for Computing Machin- ery, New York, NY, USA, 2023) pp. 173–176

    work page 2023