pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1904.05363 · v3 · submitted 2019-04-10 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-ph· physics.space-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

Vitor Cardoso , Paolo Pani
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 12:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-phphysics.space-ph
keywords dark compact objectsKerr black holesgravitational wavesvery long baseline interferometryexotic objectsevent horizonsspacetime tests
0
0 comments X

The pith

Observations of dark compact objects can distinguish black holes from exotic alternatives requiring new physics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Massive dark compact objects are described as black holes in standard astrophysics, but exotic versions could exist and point to new fundamental physics. The paper surveys the current status of testing this with gravitational waves from mergers and very long baseline interferometry imaging. Any observed deviation from Kerr black hole behavior would challenge the standard model, while consistent results would bolster it. This matters for resolving questions about dark matter, spacetime singularities, and unitarity in evaporation.

Core claim

The paper establishes that gravitational-wave astronomy and VLBI observations now enable tests of the nature of dark compact objects, where evidence against the Kerr metric would indicate beyond-the-standard-model physics.

What carries the argument

Comparison of observed signals to the Kerr black hole metric versus signatures expected from exotic compact objects without horizons or with different internal structures.

Load-bearing premise

Any deviations from the Kerr metric due to exotic compact objects would produce detectable effects in gravitational-wave or VLBI observations.

What would settle it

A gravitational wave signal from a binary merger that cannot be fit by Kerr black hole templates but is consistent with an exotic compact object waveform.

read the original abstract

Very compact objects probe extreme gravitational fields and may be the key to understand outstanding puzzles in fundamental physics. These include the nature of dark matter, the fate of spacetime singularities, or the loss of unitarity in Hawking evaporation. The standard astrophysical description of collapsing objects tells us that massive, dark and compact objects are black holes. Any observation suggesting otherwise would be an indication of beyond-the-standard-model physics. Null results strengthen and quantify the Kerr black hole paradigm. The advent of gravitational-wave astronomy and precise measurements with very long baseline interferometry allow one to finally probe into such foundational issues. We overview the physics of exotic dark compact objects and their observational status, including the observational evidence for black holes with current and future experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a status report reviewing the physics of exotic dark compact objects as alternatives to black holes, their potential relevance to fundamental puzzles such as dark matter, spacetime singularities, and Hawking evaporation unitarity, and the current observational status of tests using gravitational-wave astronomy and very long baseline interferometry. It claims that any deviation from the Kerr metric would indicate beyond-standard-model physics, while existing null results strengthen and quantify the black hole paradigm.

Significance. This synthesis is significant for the field because it consolidates a wide range of existing literature on exotic compact object models and their observational constraints from gravitational waves and VLBI, providing a clear framework for how future data can probe foundational questions in gravity. The framing of null results as quantitative support for the Kerr paradigm is a useful contribution to ongoing discussions in gravitational physics.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could list the primary exotic objects (e.g., boson stars, gravastars) explicitly to better orient readers unfamiliar with the subfield.
  2. [Conclusion] A summary table compiling current observational bounds from GW ringdown, inspiral, and VLBI shadow measurements would improve readability and allow quick comparison across probes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The feedback confirms that the review consolidates the relevant literature and provides a useful framework for future tests of the Kerr paradigm.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in status report synthesis

full rationale

The paper is a review and status report synthesizing existing literature on exotic compact objects, their physics, and observational tests via gravitational waves and VLBI. No new derivations, equations, fits, or predictions are introduced that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. All central claims, including the strengthening of the Kerr paradigm by null results, rest on cited external results from the broader literature. No self-citation chains are load-bearing in a way that creates circularity, and the analysis remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard assumptions from general relativity and astrophysics without introducing new free parameters or invented entities in this review.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The standard astrophysical description of collapsing objects tells us that massive, dark and compact objects are black holes.
    Presented as the baseline description in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5418 in / 1116 out tokens · 60624 ms · 2026-05-13T12:33:50.471865+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 27 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Testing the Kerr hypothesis beyond the quadrupole with GW241011

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    GW241011 data shows consistency with Kerr black holes for both quadrupole and octupole moments and delivers the first observational bounds on spin-induced octupole deviations.

  2. Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar yields a unified framework for regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes satisfying the weak energy condition, recovering kn...

  3. Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar produces families of regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes in GR, including new closed-form solutions involving hypergeo...

  4. Axial tidal Love numbers of black holes in matter environments

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Axial tidal Love numbers for black holes in anisotropic fluid environments are derived analytically and numerically, with non-compact support density profiles producing logarithmic terms that obstruct standard tidal m...

  5. GRMHD accretion beyond the black hole paradigm: Light from within the shadow

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    3D GRMHD simulations of accretion onto a JMN-1 horizonless singularity produce a magnetically arrested disk with an accretion rate of ~3e-6 Eddington matching M87* observations and EHT-consistent images, plus central ...

  6. Axial Oscillations of Viscous Neutron Stars

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Viscous neutron stars have new families of axial oscillation modes without perfect-fluid counterparts, featuring mode avoidance and long-lived modes.

  7. Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.

  8. Proca-Maxwell System in an Infinite Tower of Higher-Derivative Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Higher-order terms in an infinite tower of higher-derivative gravity regularize a 5D Proca-Maxwell system, creating frozen regular cores that mimic extremal black holes and satisfy all energy conditions.

  9. Gravitational Waves from a Black Hole Falling Radially into a Thin-Shell Traversable Wormhole

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Analytic gravitational waveforms from radial test-particle infall into a thin-shell traversable wormhole exhibit a characteristic pulse-gap structure from repeated throat crossings and lie within reach of ground-based...

  10. Gravitational Properties of the Monopole Bag

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Monopole bags in axionic backgrounds gravitationally collapse into horizonless states or dyonic regular black holes that evade singularities while retaining axionic hair.

  11. Ringing of rapidly rotating black holes in effective field theory

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Leading-order cubic-curvature corrections to scalar quasinormal modes of black holes with spins up to 0.99M are computed numerically for modes up to l=5 with relative errors below 10^{-4}.

  12. Rindler Physics with a UV Cutoff on the Lattice

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Lattice regularization of Rindler QFT shows the Unruh effect survives operationally for distant observables even though exact thermality is lost at the state level, with wave packets reflected at a stretched horizon o...

  13. Quasinormal modes of massless scalar and electromagnetic perturbations for Euler Heisenberg black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quasinormal frequencies and greybody factors for massless scalar and electromagnetic perturbations in Euler-Heisenberg black holes with perfect fluid dark matter are calculated via AIM and sixth-order WKB, showing tha...

  14. Can wormholes have vanishing Love numbers?

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    For a specific R=0 wormhole, the magnetic Love number for ℓ=2 vanishes to linear order in the regularization parameter under static axial gravitational perturbations.

  15. Gravitational Properties of the Monopole Bag

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Monopole bags in axion models can collapse into horizonless objects or dyonic regular black holes that evade singularities and retain axionic structure through Chern-Simons effects.

  16. Testing solitonic boson star interpretations of Sagittarius A* with near-infrared flare astrometry

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Fitting GRAVITY flare astrometry to solitonic boson star models requires masses larger than 4.3 million solar masses, with more diffuse models yielding values closer to the standard black hole mass and thus placing st...

  17. Energy conditions in static, spherically symmetric spacetimes and effective geometries

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A logarithmic correction to Schwarzschild in static spherical symmetry obeys all classical energy conditions and serves as an effective exterior for horizon-bearing and horizonless compact objects.

  18. Spectroscopy of analogue black holes using simulation-based inference

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulation-based inference reliably extracts physical parameters from noisy spectra of analogue black holes.

  19. Probing Kerr Symmetry Breaking with LISA Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LISA EMRIs can constrain deviations from Kerr equatorial symmetry to 10^{-2} and axial symmetry to 10^{-3} using Analytic Kludge waveforms and Fisher analysis.

  20. Are Black Holes Fuzzballs? Probing Horizon-Scale Structure with LISA

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LISA can constrain non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the 10^{-3} level and axisymmetric mass octupole deformations at the 10^{-2} level in EMRI signals to test fuzzball proposals.

  21. GW250114: testing Hawking's area law and the Kerr nature of black holes

    gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 5.0

    GW250114 data confirm the remnant black hole ringdown frequencies lie within 30% of Kerr predictions and that the final horizon area is larger than the sum of the progenitors' areas to high credibility.

  22. Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 5.0

    No evidence for deviations from general relativity is found in LIGO-Virgo binary black hole events, with improved constraints on waveform parameters, graviton mass, and ringdown properties.

  23. Bayesian Analysis of Massive Boson Star Models for Sagittarius A* Using Near-Infrared Astrometry Data

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Bayesian analysis shows current near-IR astrometry data cannot distinguish massive boson stars from Schwarzschild black holes for Sgr A*.

  24. Unveiling Inner Shadows and Polarization Signatures of Rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Numerical backward ray-tracing shows that the inner shadow size shrinks with the Gauss-Bonnet coupling while polarization direction near the shadow and photon ring shifts noticeably, and combining both observables yie...

  25. Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    gr-qc 2021-12 accept novelty 3.0

    No evidence for physics beyond general relativity is found in the analysis of 15 GW events from GWTC-3, with consistency in residuals, PN parameters, and remnant properties.

  26. Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    gr-qc 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review summarizing the state of the art in black hole quasinormal modes, ringdown waveform modeling, current LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observations, and prospects for LISA and next-generation detectors.

  27. The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    gr-qc 2025-03

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 25 Pith papers · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Chandrasekhar, The Nora and Edward Ryerson lecture, Chicago April 22 1975

    Quoting Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, “In my entire scientific life, extending over forty-five years, the most shattering experience has been the realization that an exact solution of Einstein’s equations of general relativity provides the absolutely exact representation of untold numbers of black holes that populate the universe.” S. Chandrasekhar, The Nora ...

    work page 1975

  2. [2]

    On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory

    K. Schwarzschild, “On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,” Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1916 (1916) 189–196, arXiv:physics/9905030 [physics]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1916

  3. [3]

    The field of a single centre in Einstein’s theory of gravitation, and the motion of a particle in that field,

    J. Droste, “The field of a single centre in Einstein’s theory of gravitation, and the motion of a particle in that field,” Proceedings of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Science 19 (1917) 197–215

    work page 1917

  4. [4]

    Global Nonlinear Stability of Schwarzschild Spacetime under Polarized Perturbations,

    S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel, “Global Nonlinear Stability of Schwarzschild Spacetime under Polarized Perturbations,” arXiv:1711.07597 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    Stationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond

    P. T. Chrusciel, J. L. Costa, and M. Heusler, “Stationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond,” Living Rev.Rel. 15 (2012) 7, arXiv:1205.6112 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    The LIGO/Virgo Scientific Collaboration Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 6, (2016) 061102, arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc] . 77

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Tests of general relativity with GW150914

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Tests of general relativity with GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 22, (2016) 221101, arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.121,no.12,129902(2018)]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Event-horizon-scale structure in the supermassive black hole candidate at the Galactic Centre,

    S. Doeleman et al., “Event-horizon-scale structure in the supermassive black hole candidate at the Galactic Centre,” Nature 455 (2008) 78, arXiv:0809.2442 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

    J. Antoniadis et al., “A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary,” Science 340 (2013) 6131, arXiv:1304.6875 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    The Galactic Center Massive Black Hole and Nuclear Star Cluster,

    R. Genzel, F. Eisenhauer, and S. Gillessen, “The Galactic Center Massive Black Hole and Nuclear Star Cluster,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 3121–3195, arXiv:1006.0064 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Toward the event horizon – the supermassive black hole in the Galactic Center,

    H. Falcke and S. B. Markoff, “Toward the event horizon – the supermassive black hole in the Galactic Center,” Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 244003, arXiv:1311.1841 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Testing General Relativity with the Shadow Size of Sgr A*,

    T. Johannsen, A. E. Broderick, P. M. Plewa, S. Chatzopoulos, S. S. Doeleman, F. Eisenhauer, V. L. Fish, R. Genzel, O. Gerhard, and M. D. Johnson, “Testing General Relativity with the Shadow Size of Sgr A*,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 3, (2016) 031101, arXiv:1512.02640 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole

    GRAVITY Collaboration, R. Abuter et al., “Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole,” Astron. Astrophys. 615 (2018) L15, arXiv:1807.09409 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. 875 no. 1, (2019) L1

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,” Riv. Nuovo Cim. 1 (1969) 252–276. [Gen. Rel. Grav.34,1141(2002)]

    work page 1969

  16. [16]

    Gravitational collapse and cosmic censorship,

    R. M. Wald, “Gravitational collapse and cosmic censorship,” in Black Holes, Gravitational Radiation and the Universe: Essays in Honor of C.V. Vishveshwara , pp. 69–85. 1997. arXiv:gr-qc/9710068 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1997

  17. [17]

    Singularities of Spacetime (in Theoretical Principles in Astrophysics and Relativity),

    R. Penrose, “Singularities of Spacetime (in Theoretical Principles in Astrophysics and Relativity),” in Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1978 217 P. 1978

    work page 1978

  18. [18]

    Viewpoint: A Possible Failure of Determinism in General Relativity,

    H. Reall, “Viewpoint: A Possible Failure of Determinism in General Relativity,” Physics 11 (2018) 6

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    The Interior of charged black holes and the problem of uniqueness in general relativity,

    M. Dafermos, “The Interior of charged black holes and the problem of uniqueness in general relativity,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 58 (2005) 0445–0504, arXiv:gr-qc/0307013 [gr-qc] . 78

    work page arXiv 2005

  20. [20]

    Quasinormal modes and Strong Cosmic Censorship,

    V. Cardoso, J. L. Costa, K. Destounis, P. Hintz, and A. Jansen, “Quasinormal modes and Strong Cosmic Censorship,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 3, (2018) 031103, arXiv:1711.10502 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 (1971) 1344–1346

    work page 1971

  22. [22]

    Constraining black-hole horizon effects by LIGO-Virgo detections of inspiralling binary black holes,

    K.-H. Lai and T. G. F. Li, “Constraining black-hole horizon effects by LIGO-Virgo detections of inspiralling binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D98 no. 8, (2018) 084059, arXiv:1807.01840 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Lower limit on the entropy of black holes as inferred from gravitational wave observations,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved, and K. Yagi, “Lower limit on the entropy of black holes as inferred from gravitational wave observations,” arXiv:1811.12283 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Black holes and massive remnants,

    S. B. Giddings, “Black holes and massive remnants,” Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 1347–1352, arXiv:hep-th/9203059 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1992

  25. [25]

    Gravitational Vacuum Condensate Stars

    P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, “Gravitational vacuum condensate stars,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101 (2004) 9545–9550, arXiv:gr-qc/0407075 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    The fuzzball proposal for black holes: an elementary review

    S. D. Mathur, “The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An Elementary review,” Fortsch. Phys. 53 (2005) 793–827, arXiv:hep-th/0502050 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  27. [27]

    Fuzzballs and the information paradox: A Summary and conjectures,

    S. D. Mathur, “Fuzzballs and the information paradox: A Summary and conjectures,” arXiv:0810.4525 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Nonlocality versus complementarity: A Conservative approach to the information problem,

    S. B. Giddings, “Nonlocality versus complementarity: A Conservative approach to the information problem,” Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 025002, arXiv:0911.3395 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2011

  29. [29]

    The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,

    S. D. Mathur, “The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224001, arXiv:0909.1038 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2009

  30. [30]

    Black holes, quantum information, and unitary evolution,

    S. B. Giddings, “Black holes, quantum information, and unitary evolution,” Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 124063, arXiv:1201.1037 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  31. [31]

    Where does the physics of extreme gravitational collapse reside?,

    C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Where does the physics of extreme gravitational collapse reside?,” Universe 2 no. 2, (2016) 7, arXiv:1510.04957 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Gravitational wave tests of quantum modifications to black hole structure – with post-GW150914 update,

    S. B. Giddings, “Gravitational wave tests of quantum modifications to black hole structure – with post-GW150914 update,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33 no. 23, (2016) 235010, arXiv:1602.03622 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Nonviolent unitarization: basic postulates to soft quantum structure of black holes,

    S. B. Giddings, “Nonviolent unitarization: basic postulates to soft quantum structure of black holes,” JHEP 12 (2017) 047, arXiv:1701.08765 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?,” JHEP 1302 (2013) 062, arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th] . 79

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    Information Loss,

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, “Information Loss,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 80 no. 9, (2017) 092002, arXiv:1703.02140 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Astronomical tests for quantum black hole structure,

    S. B. Giddings, “Astronomical tests for quantum black hole structure,” arXiv:1703.03387 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    White Holes as Remnants: A Surprising Scenario for the End of a Black Hole,

    E. Bianchi, M. Christodoulou, F. D’Ambrosio, H. M. Haggard, and C. Rovelli, “White Holes as Remnants: A Surprising Scenario for the End of a Black Hole,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35 no. 22, (2018) 225003, arXiv:1802.04264 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Exploring strong-field deviations from general relativity via gravitational waves,

    S. B. Giddings, S. Koren, and G. Trevi˜ no, “Exploring strong-field deviations from general relativity via gravitational waves,” arXiv:1904.04258 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 1904

  39. [39]

    The Hierarchy Problem and New Dimensions at a Millimeter

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali, “The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter,” Phys. Lett. B429 (1998) 263–272, arXiv:hep-ph/9803315 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  40. [40]

    An Alternative to Compactification

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “An Alternative to compactification,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690–4693, arXiv:hep-th/9906064 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  41. [41]

    Tests for the existence of black holes through gravitational wave echoes,

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Tests for the existence of black holes through gravitational wave echoes,” Nat. Astron. 1 no. 9, (2017) 586–591, arXiv:1709.01525 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Spectroscopy of the quantum black hole,

    J. D. Bekenstein and V. F. Mukhanov, “Spectroscopy of the quantum black hole,” Phys. Lett. B360 (1995) 7–12, arXiv:gr-qc/9505012 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 1995

  43. [43]

    Empty black holes, firewalls, and the origin of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,

    M. Saravani, N. Afshordi, and R. B. Mann, “Empty black holes, firewalls, and the origin of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23 no. 13, (2015) 1443007, arXiv:1212.4176 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    Testing Quantum Black Holes with Gravitational Waves,

    V. F. Foit and M. Kleban, “Testing Quantum Black Holes with Gravitational Waves,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 035006, arXiv:1611.07009 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Gravitational wave echoes from black hole area quantization,

    V. Cardoso, V. F. Foit, and M. Kleban, “Gravitational wave echoes from black hole area quantization,” arXiv:1902.10164 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1902

  46. [46]

    Decoding infrared imprints of quantum origins of black holes,

    S. Chakraborty and K. Lochan, “Decoding infrared imprints of quantum origins of black holes,” Phys. Lett. B789 (2019) 276–286, arXiv:1711.10660 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

    C. M. Will, “The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment,” Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 4, arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    MICROSCOPE Mission: First Constraints on the Violation of the Weak Equivalence Principle by a Light Scalar Dilaton,

    J. Berg´ e, P. Brax, G. M´ etris, M. Pernot-Borr` as, P. Touboul, and J.-P. Uzan, “MICROSCOPE Mission: First Constraints on the Violation of the Weak Equivalence Principle by a Light Scalar Dilaton,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 14, (2018) 141101, arXiv:1712.00483 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    A new era in the search for dark matter,

    G. Bertone and M. P. Tait, Tim, “A new era in the search for dark matter,” Nature 562 no. 7725, (2018) 51–56, arXiv:1810.01668 [astro-ph.CO] . 80

    work page arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap

    L. Barack et al., “Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,” arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  51. [51]

    Axion Cosmology

    D. J. E. Marsh, “Axion Cosmology,” Phys. Rept. 643 (2016) 1–79, arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    Modified Gravity and Cosmology

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, “Modified Gravity and Cosmology,” Phys. Rept. 513 (2012) 1–189, arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012

  53. [53]

    Formation of solitonic stars through gravitational cooling,

    E. Seidel and W.-M. Suen, “Formation of solitonic stars through gravitational cooling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 2516–2519, arXiv:gr-qc/9309015 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 1994

  54. [54]

    Dynamical Boson Stars,

    S. L. Liebling and C. Palenzuela, “Dynamical Boson Stars,” Living Rev. Rel. 15 (2012) 6, arXiv:1202.5809 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    Accretion of dark matter by stars,

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and H. Okawa, “Accretion of dark matter by stars,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 no. 11, (2015) 111301, arXiv:1508.04773 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Dynamical formation of Proca stars and quasistationary solitonic objects,

    F. Di Giovanni, N. Sanchis-Gual, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and J. A. Font, “Dynamical formation of Proca stars and quasistationary solitonic objects,” Phys. Rev. D98 no. 6, (2018) 064044, arXiv:1803.04802 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Compact stars made of fermionic dark matter,

    G. Narain, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and I. N. Mishustin, “Compact stars made of fermionic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 063003, arXiv:astro-ph/0605724 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  58. [58]

    Light Primordial Exotic Compact Objects as All Dark Matter

    M. Raidal, S. Solodukhin, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, “Light Primordial Exotic Compact Objects as All Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D97 no. 12, (2018) 123520, arXiv:1802.07728 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Dark compact objects: an extensive overview

    M. Deliyergiyev, A. Del Popolo, L. Tolos, M. Le Delliou, X. Lee, and F. Burgio, “Dark compact objects: an extensive overview,” Phys. Rev. D99 no. 6, (2019) 063015, arXiv:1903.01183 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Large-D gravity and low-D strings,

    R. Emparan, D. Grumiller, and K. Tanabe, “Large-D gravity and low-D strings,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 no. 25, (2013) 251102, arXiv:1303.1995 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions,

    G. ’t Hooft, “A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions,” Nucl. Phys. B72 (1974) 461. [,337(1973)]

    work page 1974

  62. [62]

    The problem of induction,

    K. Popper, “The problem of induction,” in Popper Selections, D. Miller, ed., pp. 101–117. Princeton, 1985

    work page 1985

  63. [63]

    The black hole fifty years after: Genesis of the name,

    C. A. R. Herdeiro and J. P. S. Lemos, “The black hole fifty years after: Genesis of the name,” arXiv:1811.06587 [physics.hist-ph]

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2011. 81

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    The many definitions of a black hole,

    E. Curiel, “The many definitions of a black hole,” Nat. Astron. 3 no. 1, (2019) 27–34, arXiv:1808.01507 [physics.hist-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    Event and apparent horizon finders for 3+1 numerical relativity,

    J. Thornburg, “Event and apparent horizon finders for 3+1 numerical relativity,” Living Rev. Rel. 10 (2007) 3, arXiv:gr-qc/0512169 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2007

  67. [67]

    Trapped surfaces in the Schwarzschild geometry and cosmic censorship,

    R. M. Wald and V. Iyer, “Trapped surfaces in the Schwarzschild geometry and cosmic censorship,” Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) R3719–R3722

    work page 1991

  68. [68]

    Black Holes Do Evaporate Thermally,

    J. M. Bardeen, “Black Holes Do Evaporate Thermally,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 46 (1981) 382–385

    work page 1981

  69. [69]

    Dynamical Origin of Black Hole Radiance,

    J. W. York, Jr., “Dynamical Origin of Black Hole Radiance,” Phys. Rev. D28 (1983) 2929

    work page 1983

  70. [70]

    What gravity waves are telling about quantum spacetime,

    M. Arzano and G. Calcagni, “What gravity waves are telling about quantum spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D93 no. 12, (2016) 124065, arXiv:1604.00541 [gr-qc] . [Addendum: Phys. Rev.D94,no.4,049907(2016)]

    work page arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    No observational proof of the black-hole event-horizon

    M. A. Abramowicz, W. Kluzniak, and J.-P. Lasota, “No observational proof of the black hole event-horizon,” Astron. Astrophys. 396 (2002) L31–L34, arXiv:astro-ph/0207270 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  72. [72]

    Gravastar formation: What can be the evidence of a black hole?,

    K.-i. Nakao, C.-M. Yoo, and T. Harada, “Gravastar formation: What can be the evidence of a black hole?,” Phys. Rev. D99 no. 4, (2019) 044027, arXiv:1809.00124 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Possible observational windows for quantum effects from black holes,

    S. B. Giddings, “Possible observational windows for quantum effects from black holes,” Phys. Rev. D90 no. 12, (2014) 124033, arXiv:1406.7001 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    Quantum hair of black holes out of equilibrium,

    R. Brustein and A. J. M. Medved, “Quantum hair of black holes out of equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. D97 no. 4, (2018) 044035, arXiv:1709.03566 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    Discovering the interior of black holes,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved, and K. Yagi, “Discovering the interior of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D96 no. 12, (2017) 124021, arXiv:1701.07444 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    Are gravitational wave ringdown echoes always equal-interval?,

    Y.-T. Wang, Z.-P. Li, J. Zhang, S.-Y. Zhou, and Y.-S. Piao, “Are gravitational wave ringdown echoes always equal-interval?,” Eur. Phys. J. C78 no. 6, (2018) 482, arXiv:1802.02003 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    On echo intervals in gravitational wave echo analysis,

    Y.-T. Wang, J. Zhang, S.-Y. Zhou, and Y.-S. Piao, “On echo intervals in gravitational wave echo analysis,” arXiv:1904.00212 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 1904

  78. [78]

    Exotic compact objects with soft hair,

    G. Raposo, P. Pani, and R. Emparan, “Exotic compact objects with soft hair,” Phys. Rev. D99 no. 10, (2019) 104050, arXiv:1812.07615 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes

    S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes . Oxford University Press, New York, 1983. 82

    work page 1983

  80. [80]

    Astrophysics and black holes,

    I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne, “Astrophysics and black holes,” in Proceedings, Ecole d’Et´ e de Physique Th´ eorique: Les Astres Occlus, pp. 343–550. 1973

    work page 1973

Showing first 80 references.