Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

This paper argues that proposed space-based atom-interferometer gravitational-wave detectors, operating in the gap between LIGO and LISA, could detect white-dwarf binaries years before they merge, predict or promptly identify the merger, an

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 08:33 UTC pith:5UP76O2S

load-bearing objection Solid quantitative forecast for WDB mergers with mid-band atom interferometers, but the headline 'at least' rates rest on a load-bearing RLOF=merger assumption the paper never fully quantifies. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.19913 v2 pith:5UP76O2S submitted 2025-10-22 gr-qc astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-phphysics.atom-ph

Detecting White Dwarf Binary Mergers with Gravitational Waves

Giona Sala , Chiara Brandenstein , Sebastian Baum , Peter W. Graham This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-phphysics.atom-ph
keywords white dwarf binariesgravitational wavesatom interferometersmid-band detectorsType Ia supernovaedouble degenerate scenariomulti-messenger astronomymerger rates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that proposed space-based atom-interferometer gravitational-wave detectors, which would operate in the largely unexplored mid-band between LIGO and LISA, could observe white dwarf binaries during their final inspiral and merger. It argues that these signals would give years of warning before the merger, precise sky localisation, and a way to either forecast or immediately recognise the coalescence, making it possible to catch the electromagnetic explosion — possibly a Type Ia supernova — that follows. The central quantitative claims are that MAGIS Space would detect a likely Type Ia supernova progenitor at least once every four years, while the more sensitive AEDGE would observe at least a few hundred such events per year. A sympathetic reader would care because this would create a new multi-messenger channel for some of the brightest transients in the universe, and would let gravitational waves weigh in on the long-debated origin of Type Ia supernovae.

Core claim

White dwarf binaries with masses above roughly 0.6 solar masses merge at frequencies between about 50 mHz and 1 Hz, a band that existing ground-based detectors cannot reach and where LISA loses sensitivity. The paper computes the gravitational-wave signal from such binaries up to the onset of Roche-lobe overflow, uses Fisher analysis to forecast parameter estimation with atom-interferometer detectors, and finds that chirp mass can be measured to better than 10^-5 solar masses and sky position to 0.001–1 square degrees at 25 Mpc. It then argues that mass transfer after overflow produces a measurable dephasing of the waveform that serves as an early-warning signal for binaries below about 1.2

What carries the argument

The central object is the gravitational-wave signal of an inspiraling white dwarf binary, modelled as a point-mass inspiral with post-Newtonian corrections up to 3.5 order, cut off at the frequency where the lighter white dwarf fills its Roche lobe. The argument is carried by three mechanisms: (1) a Fisher-matrix analysis of this signal, which shows that chirp mass and sky position are measured very accurately while mass ratio and luminosity distance are not; (2) a dephasing test that compares the observed waveform to the pure point-mass prediction, where accumulating a phase difference of pi flags mass transfer and gives days-to-a-year early warning of merger; and (3) a signal-disappearance

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is stated in Section 6: that every white dwarf binary that reaches Roche-lobe overflow is destined to merge; if a substantial fraction instead become stable AM CVn systems and survive, the projected detection and multi-messenger rates are overestimated.

What would settle it

Measure the outcome of Roche-lobe overflow in white dwarf binaries—via hydrodynamical simulations of mass transfer or via a large electromagnetic sample of AM CVn systems in the relevant mass range. If a sizable fraction (tens of percent or more) of these binaries survive as stable mass-transferring systems rather than merging, the claimed once-per-four-years MAGIS rate and the AEDGE hundreds-per-year rate collapse proportionally.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the rates hold, MAGIS Space would deliver a multi-messenger Type Ia supernova event roughly once every four years, and AEDGE hundreds per year, turning supernova progenitor tracking into a routine rather than a one-off observation.
  • Gravitational-wave sky localisation at the sub-degree level would let electromagnetic telescopes point at the right patch of sky in time to catch the explosion or its afterglow.
  • The combined gravitational-wave distance and electromagnetic redshift would create a growing sample of bright sirens, useful for measuring the Hubble constant and other cosmological parameters.
  • A year of AEDGE observations without a gravitational-wave counterpart to electromagnetically seen Type Ia supernovae would constrain the double-degenerate channel to contribute less than about 10 percent of these events.
  • The early-warning capability (weeks to up to a year for moderately massive binaries) makes it possible to observe the final explosion itself, not just the afterglow.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's rates equate the Roche-lobe-overflow population with the merger population; if a large fraction of these binaries instead settle into stable AM Canum Venaticorum systems, the projected multi-messenger rates would drop in proportion to that stable fraction.
  • The detection strategy suggests a searchable signature: a slowly chirping, near-monochromatic source whose phase begins to wander away from the point-mass prediction before the signal ends; this could be tested in simulations or with existing LISA data on resolved white dwarf binaries.
  • If AEDGE's superior sensitivity is confirmed, the same method extends beyond Type Ia progenitors to a census of white dwarf binary outcomes, possibly revealing neutron-star formation or other exotic remnants.
  • The framework transfers directly to the Lunar Gravitational Wave Antenna concept, which the authors note falls within the same rate range, so the multi-messenger promise is tied to the mid-band generally rather than to one specific instrument.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes gravitational-wave emission from inspiraling white dwarf binaries (WDBs) in the mid-frequency band, using post-Newtonian waveforms and a Fisher-matrix parameter-estimation forecast for the proposed space-based atom interferometers MAGIS Space and AEDGE. It presents two methods for estimating merger rates: a population-synthesis model (based on the SeBa code and star-formation histories) and an approach that normalizes to the observed SN Ia rate with an assumed double-degenerate fraction (DD%). The central projections are that MAGIS Space could detect SN Ia progenitor mergers at least once every four years and that AEDGE could detect hundreds per year, with the possibility of EM follow-up and multi-messenger cosmology. The paper also discusses early-warning via waveform dephasing and prompt recognition of merger via signal disappearance.

Significance. If the projected rates are correct, the paper points to a scientifically valuable new gravitational-wave window: routine detection of WDB mergers with EM counterparts, potentially clarifying the SN Ia progenitor problem and providing bright sirens for cosmology. The analysis has notable strengths: it uses standard, well-tested waveform models; openly describes a Fisher code (AIMforGWinFspace) and provides a repository; and brackets the uncertainty by using two independent rate methods and conservative/optimistic SN Ia mass windows. However, the headline rates rest on a load-bearing assumption about the fate of Roche-lobe-overflow binaries and on a low detectability threshold, and the 'at least' claim in the abstract is not robust under the paper's own uncertainty estimates. These issues are addressable but require additional work.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 6.4, Table 3] The headline claim 'MAGIS Space could detect signals from Type Ia supernova progenitors at least once every four years' is not supported by the paper's own uncertainty ranges. Table 3 gives the uncertainty band for MAGIS detectable WDB mergers that go SN Ia as 0.15–1.88 yr^-1 (model approach) and 0.29–2.67 yr^-1 (SN Ia rate approach). The lower endpoints correspond to one event every ~6.7 years, not every 4 years. The 'at least' claim appears to be based only on the lower end of the fiducial range (0.25 yr^-1). Please either present the claim as a fiducial estimate or justify why the uncertainty lower bound is not the appropriate conservative limit.
  2. [Sec. 6.1 and Appendix A] The assumption that every binary reaching Roche-lobe overflow (RLOF) is destined to merge is load-bearing for the quoted rates, but it is justified only qualitatively. The paper's own Sec. 3.2.3 and Appendix B acknowledge that stable mass transfer can lead to AM CVn survivors, and the stability thresholds from Ref. [61] are shown in Fig. 3 but never applied to correct the rates. The statement that such survivors are 'mostly outside the sensitivity' and 'tiny' is not demonstrated; Fig. 13 shows that the dominant contribution to detectable SN Ia mergers comes from M1 ~ M2 ~ 0.8 Msun, exactly the region where a stability check is needed. For a stable system that survives RLOF for a significant fraction of a Hubble time, the current merger rate is lower than the RLOF rate. Please quantify the stable fraction in the relevant mass-distance region using the adopted stability criteria and show i
  3. [Sec. 6.3 and Sec. 5] Using SNR > 2 as the detection threshold is not justified for a confident gravitational-wave detection, especially in the presence of a dense WD foreground. At SNR = 2, the parameter uncertainties in Figs. 5 and 6 are large, and Fig. 7 shows that prompt merger recognition is feasible only for Mc > 0.9 Msun. Consequently, the claim in Sec. 5 that 'we can confidently expect to observe multi-messenger signals from all WDB mergers detectable by MAGIS Space' is overoptimistic. Please either adopt a more realistic detection threshold (e.g., SNR > 8), discuss the false-alarm and confusion rates, or scale the reported rates to a threshold appropriate for confident detection and parameter estimation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'roughly one merger on a biannual basis' should be 'biennial' if one merger every two years is meant; later the text says 'at least one WDB merger every 3 years.' Please make the wording consistent.
  2. [Table 3 caption] Clarify whether the values in the column 'SN Ia rate(×DD%)' are already multiplied by DD% or should be scaled by the reader. The caption says 'should be scaled with DD%,' which is ambiguous.
  3. [Eq. (3.10)] The spin-orbit coupling term has ambiguous typesetting: the expression k M1 R1^2 / (τ_S J_orb) ω should be written with explicit parentheses so the reader can distinguish numerator and denominator.
  4. [Sec. 4.1] The repository name 'White Dwarf Binaries GW/githubrepository' is incomplete; please provide a working URL or DOI for the code used in the analysis.
  5. [Sec. 7] The statement that the first method (population-synthesis model) 'provides us with results without free variables' is misleading: the population-synthesis parameters α, γ, metallicity, and star-formation history are effectively adopted/fitted and carry substantial freedom. Rephrase to 'without reference to the SN Ia rate' rather than 'without free variables.'
  6. [Sec. 5 and Fig. 3] The text says the stability threshold 'lies outside of the mass range considered,' but Fig. 3 appears to show stability and instability thresholds within the plotted mass range. Please clarify the exact range used in the calculation and reconcile the statement with the figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: WDB detectability forecasts are new computations anchored to external population synthesis and measured SN Ia rates; self-citations are present but non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained on the points that matter for circularity. The WDB merger rates in Sec 6 are computed either from the external population-synthesis models of Refs. [14,15] or from the observed SN Ia rate of Eq. (6.1), with DD% as an explicit free scale and the same external mass function. The detector-dependent step is an SNR>2 cut using a Fisher-matrix code that the authors state is a frequency-domain variant of the public AIMforGW code and that they explicitly checked against a time-domain calculation (Sec 4.1). Thus the headline rates are not fitted to, or defined by, the claimed prediction. The statement 'We assume that every binary that reaches the RLOF is destined to merge' (Sec 6) is a substantive astrophysical assumption whose breakdown would change the rates, and Appendix B admits the stability correction was not quantified; this is a correctness/robustness concern, not a circular reduction. The self-citations to MAGIS Space concept papers and to AIMforGW are real but non-load-bearing in the circular sense: the concept papers supply a detector-sensitivity input, and the Fisher code is public and independently checked. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, so the overall circularity score is low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its free parameters are empirical fits borrowed from prior literature (mass-radius relation, r_h, k), hand-selected SN Ia mass windows, and a free DD fraction. The most influential ad hoc assumption is that every RLOF system merges. The results therefore inherit substantial uncertainty from inputs not derived or fitted in this paper.

free parameters (8)
  • WD mass-radius relation fitting constants = 0.0114, 3.5, M_p = 0.00057 M_sun (eq 3.1)
    Empirical fit from Verbunt & Rappaport (1988) [60]; controls RLOF frequency and merger evolution; adopted as input, not fitted here.
  • r_h(q) angular momentum transfer radius coefficients = 0.0883 + 0.04858 log q + 0.11489 (log q)^2 − 0.020475 (log q)^3
    Fitted in [60], used in mass-transfer eq (3.10); affects stability and merger timescales.
  • k(M1) moment of inertia fit = k = 0.1939 (1.44885 − M1)^0.1917
    Fitted in [61], used in eq (3.10) spin-orbit coupling term.
  • SN Ia mass window boundaries = conservative: 0.8≤M1≤1.1, 0.1≤M2≤1.1, M1+M2≥1.2; optimistic: 0.5≤M1≤1.44, 0.1≤M2≤1.1
    Hand-chosen extreme scenarios based on [75]; directly sets which mergers count as SN Ia progenitors and therefore drives the headline rates.
  • DD% (fraction of SN Ia from double-degenerate channel) = free; fiducial range ~25–50% inferred from cross-method agreement
    Free parameter in the SN Ia-rate approach; scales all SN Ia rates in Table 3.
  • Detectability SNR threshold = SNR > 2
    Hand-chosen detection threshold; controls all reported detection rates.
  • Observation window before RLOF = 1 yr
    Chooses f_min in eq (4.11); longer windows would increase rates.
  • Binary population synthesis parameters (α, γ) = fiducial γ=1.75, α=4 (γα model)
    From [14,15]; determines WDB mass function and merger rates in the model approach.
axioms (8)
  • standard math General-relativistic quadrupole formula for GW-driven inspiral (eq 3.2)
    Assumes leading-order PN evolution; used for frequency evolution and Fisher waveforms.
  • domain assumption TaylorF2 waveform approximates WDB inspiral signal before RLOF
    Sec 4.1; assumes point-mass binary, circular orbit, no tidal effects until RLOF cutoff.
  • domain assumption Eggleton Roche lobe formula (eq 3.5) gives RLOF onset to ~1%
    Used to set f_max = f_GW,RLOF and the merger-onset model.
  • domain assumption Marsh et al. mass-transfer evolution equation (3.10) with stable/unstable bracketing
    Models post-RLOF evolution; two extreme assumptions bracket merger timescales.
  • ad hoc to paper Every binary that reaches RLOF is destined to merge
    Explicitly stated in Sec 6; needed to equate RLOF population with merger population; may overestimate rates for stable systems.
  • domain assumption SN Ia mass-selection windows (eqs 3.11, 3.12) bracket the true SN Ia progenitor population
    Borrowed from [75]; central to SN Ia rate estimates.
  • domain assumption Population synthesis of [14,15] gives the present-day WDB merging mass function
    Used for the model approach; not independently reproduced here; based on SeBa code and assumed star formation history.
  • domain assumption Observed SN Ia rate r = 2.43e-5 yr^-1 Mpc^-3 (eq 6.1)
    Input from [89–91]; anchors the SN Ia-rate approach.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 37039 in / 16670 out tokens · 140438 ms · 2026-08-04T08:33:25.237505+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Mergers of white dwarf binaries are a possible progenitor channel for Type Ia supernovae. While white dwarfs are abundant in the universe and relatively well understood, their gravitational wave signals have not yet been directly observed. In order to detect gravitational waves from merging white dwarf binaries, a detector in the mid-band between LVK and LISA appears necessary. In this paper, we compute and discuss the gravitational waves emitted by inspiraling and merging white dwarf binaries, and assess their detectability with proposed space-based atom-interferometer detectors such as MAGIS Space and AEDGE. Gravitational waves from massive white dwarf binaries can be observed for many years before merger, offering a unique early warning of their final explosion. Our projections suggest that MAGIS Space could detect signals from Type Ia supernova progenitors at least once every four years, while AEDGE could observe at least a few hundred such events annually. The prolonged gravitational wave emission captured by atom-interferometers provides precise sky localisation and can allow observation of the final explosion with electromagnetic telescopes. The combined observation with electromagnetic radiation from the white dwarf binary coalescence could open a new pathway for multi-messenger astronomy involving some of the brightest transient events in the universe.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravitational Wave Modeling of White-Dwarf--Compact-Object Binaries and Observational Outlook

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    WD–CO binaries produce unique GW waveforms with a sharp f_max cutoff; LGWA/DECIGO will detect many end stages, while terrestrial detectors will not mistake them for sub-solar compact objects.

  2. Testing bosonic dark matter through white dwarf mass measurements

    astro-ph.HE 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    Adding a bosonic dark-matter core to white dwarf models reproduces the observed electromagnetic-vs-redshift mass discrepancies and the data favor a boson mass near 10^-10 eV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Chandrasekhar,The maximum mass of ideal white dwarfs,Astrophys

    S. Chandrasekhar,The maximum mass of ideal white dwarfs,Astrophys. J.74(1931) 81–82

    1931

  2. [2]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky,Black holes, white dwarfs and neutron stars. The physics of compact objects. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1983, 10.1002/9783527617661

    doi:10.1002/9783527617661 1983

  3. [3]

    Holberg,The discovery of the existence of white dwarf stars: 1862 to 1930,Journal for The History of Astronomy - J HIST ASTRON40(05, 2009) 137–154

    J. Holberg,The discovery of the existence of white dwarf stars: 1862 to 1930,Journal for The History of Astronomy - J HIST ASTRON40(05, 2009) 137–154

    1930

  4. [4]

    T. R. Marsh, V. S. Dhillon and S. R. Duck,Low-Mass White Dwarfs Need Friends - Five New Double-Degenerate Close Binary Stars, MNRAS275(Aug., 1995) 828

    1995

  5. [5]

    Nelemans, L

    G. Nelemans, L. R. Yungelson, S. F. Portegies Zwart and F. Verbunt,Population synthesis for double white dwarfs: I. close detached systems,Astronomy & Astrophysics365 (Jan., 2001) 491–507

    2001

  6. [6]

    Toonen, G

    S. Toonen, G. Nelemans and S. Portegies Zwart,Supernova type ia progenitors from merging double white dwarfs: Using a new population synthesis model,Astronomy & Astrophysics546(Oct., 2012) A70

    2012

  7. [7]

    Lamberts, S

    A. Lamberts, S. Blunt, T. B. Littenberg, S. Garrison-Kimmel, T. Kupfer and R. E. Sanderson,Predicting the lisa white dwarf binary population in the milky way with cosmological simulations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society490(Oct.,

  8. [8]

    I. Bar, P. Vreeswijk, A. Gal-Yam, E. O. Ofek and G. Nelemans,A Spectroscopic Search for White Dwarf Companions to 101 Nearby M Dwarfs, ApJ850(Nov., 2017) 34, [1703.07650]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Toonen, S., Hollands, M., G¨ ansicke, B. T. and Boekholt, T.,The binarity of the local white dwarf population,A&A602(2017) A16. – 42 –

    2017

  10. [10]

    K. B. Burdge, T. A. Prince, J. Fuller, D. L. Kaplan, T. R. Marsh, P.-E. Tremblay et al.,A Systematic Search of Zwicky Transient Facility Data for Ultracompact Binary LISA-detectable Gravitational-wave Sources, ApJ905(Dec., 2020) 32, [2009.02567]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    E. T. Chickles, K. B. Burdge, J. Chakraborty, V. S. Dhillon, P. Draghis, J. Munday et al., A Gravitational-wave-detectable Candidate Type Ia Supernova Progenitor, ApJ987(July,

  12. [12]

    A. J. Ruiter, K. Belczynski, M. Benacquista, S. L. Larson and G. Williams,The lisa gravitational wave foreground: A study of double white dwarfs,The Astrophysical Journal 717(jun, 2010) 1006

    2010

  13. [13]

    Maselli, S

    A. Maselli, S. Marassi and M. Branchesi,Binary white dwarfs and decihertz gravitational wave observations: From the hubble constant to supernova astrophysics,Astronomy & Astrophysics635(Mar., 2020) A120

    2020

  14. [14]

    Staelens, Seppe and Nelemans, Gijs,Likelihood of white dwarf binaries to dominate the astrophysical gravitational wave background in the mhz band,A&A683(2024) A139

    2024

  15. [15]

    Hofman, Sophie and Nelemans, Gijs,Uncertainty of the white dwarf astrophysical gravitational wave background,A&A691(2024) A261

    2024

  16. [16]

    Kinugawa, H

    T. Kinugawa, H. Takeda, A. Tanikawa and H. Yamaguchi,Probe for type ia supernova progenitor in decihertz gravitational wave astronomy,The Astrophysical Journal938(Oct.,

  17. [17]

    Mandel, A

    I. Mandel, A. Sesana and A. Vecchio,The astrophysical science case for a decihertz gravitational-wave detector,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 054004, [1710.11187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    M. A. Sedda et al.,The missing link in gravitational-wave astronomy: discoveries waiting in the decihertz range,Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020) 215011, [1908.11375]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    T. L. S. Collaboration, J. Aasi, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy et al.,Advanced LIGO,Classical and Quantum Gravity32(2015) 074001

    2015

  20. [20]

    S. Hild, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, P. Amaro-Seoane, N. Andersson, K. Arun et al., Sensitivity studies for third-generation gravitational wave observatories,Classical and Quantum Gravity28(May, 2011) 094013, [1012.0908]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    Evans, R

    M. Evans, R. X. Adhikari, C. Afle, S. W. Ballmer, S. Biscoveanu, S. Borhanian et al.,A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,arXiv e-prints(Sept., 2021) arXiv:2109.09882, [2109.09882]. [22]NANOGravcollaboration, Z. Arzoumanian et al.,The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Bac...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [24]

    Robson, N

    T. Robson, N. J. Cornish and C. Liu,The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves, Classical and Quantum Gravity36(2019) 105011. [25]LISAcollaboration, P. Amaro-Seoane et al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786. [26]LISAcollaboration, P. A. Seoane et al.,Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,Living Rev. Rel.26(2023) 2, ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [27]

    Toubiana, N

    A. Toubiana, N. Karnesis, A. Lamberts and M. C. Miller,The interacting double white dwarf population with LISA: Stochastic foreground and resolved sources,Astron. Astrophys. 692(2024) A165, [2403.16867]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [28]

    J. M. Hogan et al.,An Atomic Gravitational Wave Interferometric Sensor in Low Earth Orbit (AGIS-LEO),Gen. Rel. Grav.43(2011) 1953–2009, [1009.2702]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [29]

    Y. A. El-Neaj, C. Alpigiani, S. Amairi-Pyka, H. Ara´ ujo, A. Balaˇ z, A. Bassi et al.,AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space,EPJ Quantum Technology7(Mar., 2020) 6

    2020

  26. [30]

    Ajith, P

    P. Ajith, P. A. Seoane, M. A. Sedda, R. Arcodia, F. Badaracco, E. Belgacem et al.,The Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna: Mission Studies and Science Case,2404.09181 [astro-ph, physics:gr-qc]

    arXiv

  27. [31]

    Z.-W. Liu, F. K. Roepke and Z. Han,Type Ia Supernova Explosions in Binary Systems: A Review,Res. Astron. Astrophys.23(2023) 082001, [2305.13305]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [32]

    Hillebrandt, M

    W. Hillebrandt, M. Kromer, F. K. R¨ opke and A. J. Ruiter,Towards an understanding of Type Ia supernovae from a synthesis of theory and observations,Front. Phys. (Beijing)8 (2013) 116–143, [1302.6420]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [33]

    D. Maoz, F. Mannucci and G. Nelemans,Observational clues to the progenitors of type ia supernovae,Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics52(Aug., 2014) 107–170

    2014

  30. [34]

    Livio and P

    M. Livio and P. Mazzali,On the Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae,Phys. Rept.736(2018) 1–23, [1802.03125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [35]

    P. W. Graham and S. Jung,Localizing Gravitational Wave Sources with Single-Baseline Atom Interferometers,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 024052, [1710.03269]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [36]

    S. Baum, Z. Bogorad and P. W. Graham,Gravitational wave measurement in the mid-band with atom interferometers,JCAP05(2024) 027, [2309.07952]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [37]

    Pichardo Marcano, A

    M. Pichardo Marcano, A. B. Yelikar and K. Jani,Massive double white dwarf binary mergers from the moon: Extending the reach of multimessenger astrophysics,The Astrophysical Journal992(oct, 2025) 16

    2025

  34. [38]

    Benetti, M

    G. Benetti, M. Branchesi, J. Harms and J.-P. Zendri,Observing Double White Dwarfs with the Lunar GW Antenna,arXiv e-prints(Sept., 2025) arXiv:2509.07849, [2509.07849]. [39]MAGIS-100collaboration, M. Abe et al.,Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100),Quantum Sci. Technol.6(2021) 044003, [2104.02835]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [40]

    P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich and S. Rajendran,Resonant mode for gravitational wave detectors based on atom interferometry,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 104022, [1606.01860]. [41]LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaborationcollaboration, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley et al., Observation of gravi...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [48]

    L. Bian, S. Ge, J. Shu, B. Wang, X.-Y. Yang and J. Zong,Gravitational wave sources for pulsar timing arrays,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L101301, [2307.02376]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [49]

    Dimopoulos, P

    S. Dimopoulos, P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich and S. Rajendran,Atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 122002

    2008

  38. [50]

    Dimopoulos, P

    S. Dimopoulos, P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich and S. Rajendran, Gravitational wave detection with atom interferometry,Physics Letters B678(July, 2009) 37–40

    2009

  39. [51]

    P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich and S. Rajendran,A New Method for Gravitational Wave Detection with Atomic Sensors,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 171102, [1206.0818]. [52]MAGIScollaboration, P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich, S. Rajendran and R. W. Romani,Mid-band gravitational wave detection with precision atomic sensors, 1711.02225

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [53]

    Kolkowitz, I

    S. Kolkowitz, I. Pikovski, N. Langellier, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth and J. Ye, Gravitational wave detection with optical lattice atomic clocks,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 124043, [1606.01859]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [54]

    Badurina et al.,AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network,JCAP05 (2020) 011, [1911.11755]

    L. Badurina et al.,AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network,JCAP05 (2020) 011, [1911.11755]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [55]

    Canuel, A

    B. Canuel, A. Bertoldi, L. Amand, E. Pozzo di Borgo, T. Chantrait, C. Danquigny et al., Exploring gravity with the miga large scale atom interferometer,Scientific Reports8(2018) 14064

    2018

  43. [56]

    M.-S. Zhan, J. Wang, W.-T. Ni, D.-F. Gao, G. Wang, L.-X. He et al.,Zaiga: Zhaoshan long-baseline atom interferometer gravitation antenna,International Journal of Modern Physics D29(July, 2019) 1940005

    2019

  44. [57]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams et al., Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger, ApJ848(Oct., 2017) L12, [1710.05833]. – 45 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [58]

    B. W. Carroll and D. A. Ostlie,An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 2017

    2017

  46. [59]

    Ambrosino,White dwarf mass-radius relation,2012.01242

    F. Ambrosino,White dwarf mass-radius relation,2012.01242

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [60]

    Verbunt and S

    F. Verbunt and S. Rappaport,Mass Transfer Instabilities Due to Angular Momentum Flows in Close Binaries, ApJ332(Sept., 1988) 193

    1988

  48. [61]

    T. R. Marsh, G. Nelemans and D. Steeghs,Mass transfer between double white dwarfs, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society350(May, 2004) 113–128

    2004

  49. [62]

    Kremer, K

    K. Kremer, K. Breivik, S. L. Larson and V. Kalogera,Accreting double white dwarf binaries: Implications for LISA,The Astrophysical Journal846(2017) 95, [1707.01104 [astro-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [63]

    Liebert, P

    J. Liebert, P. Bergeron, D. Eisenstein, H. C. Harris, S. J. Kleinman, A. Nitta et al.,A Helium White Dwarf of Extremely Low Mass, ApJ606(May, 2004) L147–L149, [astro-ph/0404291]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  51. [64]

    Werner, N

    K. Werner, N. J. Hammer, T. Nagel, T. Rauch and S. Dreizler,On Possible Oxygen/Neon White Dwarfs: H1504+65 and the White Dwarf Donors in Ultracompact X-ray Binaries, in 14th European Workshop on White Dwarfs(D. Koester and S. Moehler, eds.), vol. 334 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, p. 165, July, 2005, astro-ph/0410690, DOI

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  52. [65]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford University Press, 2007, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001

    arXiv 2007

  53. [66]

    Yoshida,Decihertz gravitational waves from double white dwarf merger remnants,The Astrophysical Journal906(Jan., 2021) 29

    S. Yoshida,Decihertz gravitational waves from double white dwarf merger remnants,The Astrophysical Journal906(Jan., 2021) 29

    2021

  54. [67]

    and Garcia-Berro, E

    Isern, J. and Garcia-Berro, E. and Guerrero, J. and Lobo, J. A. and Ib´ a˜ nez, J. M., Gravitational Waves from the Merging of White Dwarfs, pp. 295–298. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2003. 10.1007/978-94-010-0215-8 89

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0215-8 2003

  55. [68]

    K. A. Postnov and L. R. Yungelson,The evolution of compact binary star systems,Living Reviews in Relativity17(May, 2014)

    2014

  56. [69]

    Yang, P.-H

    H.-W. Yang, P.-H. Thomas Tam and L. Yang,Revealing double white dwarf mergers with multi-messenger signals,Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics22(Oct., 2022) 105014

    2022

  57. [70]

    Zou, X.-L

    Z.-C. Zou, X.-L. Zhou and Y.-F. Huang,The gravitational wave emission of double white dwarf coalescences,Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics20(Sept., 2020) 137

    2020

  58. [71]

    M. Dan, S. Rosswog, J. Guillochon and E. Ramirez-Ruiz,How the merger of two white dwarfs depends on their mass ratio: orbital stability and detonations at contact,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society422(05, 2012) 2417–2428

    2012

  59. [72]

    Pakmor, M

    R. Pakmor, M. Kromer, S. Taubenberger, S. A. Sim, F. K. R¨ opke and W. Hillebrandt, Normal type ia supernovae from violent mergers of white dwarf binaries,The Astrophysical Journal747(Feb., 2012) L10

    2012

  60. [73]

    Y. Sato, N. Nakasato, A. Tanikawa, K. Nomoto, K. Maeda and I. Hachisu,The critical mass ratio of double white dwarf binaries for violent merger-induced type ia supernova explosions,The Astrophysical Journal821(apr, 2016) 67

    2016

  61. [74]

    L. R. Yungelson and A. G. Kuranov,Merging white dwarfs and sn ia,arXiv e-prints(10,

  62. [75]

    K. J. Shen,Every interacting double white dwarf binary may merge,The Astrophysical Journal Letters805(may, 2015) L6

    2015

  63. [76]

    T. R. Marsh,Double white dwarfs and lisa,Classical and Quantum Gravity28(Apr., 2011) 094019

    2011

  64. [77]

    Nelemans, L

    G. Nelemans, L. R. Yungelson and S. F. Portegies Zwart,The gravitational wave signal from the galactic disk population of binaries containing two compact objects,Astronomy & Astrophysics375(Sept., 2001) 890–898

    2001

  65. [78]

    Badenes and D

    C. Badenes and D. Maoz,The Merger Rate of Binary White Dwarfs in the Galactic Disk, Astrophys. J. Lett.749(2012) L11, [1202.5472]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [79]

    Rebassa-Mansergas, S

    A. Rebassa-Mansergas, S. Toonen, V. Korol and S. Torres,Where are the double-degenerate progenitors of type ia supernovae?,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society482 (Nov., 2018) 3656–3668

    2018

  67. [80]

    D. Maoz, N. Hallakoun and C. Badenes,The separation distribution and merger rate of double white dwarfs: improved constraints,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.476(2018) 2584–2590, [1801.04275]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [81]

    Breivik, S

    K. Breivik, S. Coughlin, M. Zevin, C. L. Rodriguez, K. Kremer, C. S. Ye et al.,Cosmic variance in binary population synthesis,The Astrophysical Journal898(July, 2020) 71

    2020

  69. [82]

    Cheng, J

    S. Cheng, J. Cummings, B. M´ enard and S. Toonen,Double white dwarf merger products among high-mass white dwarfs,The Astrophysical Journal891(Mar., 2020) 160

    2020

  70. [83]

    S. O. Kepler, S. J. Kleinman, A. Nitta, D. Koester, B. G. Castanheira, O. Giovannini et al., White dwarf mass distribution in the SDSS, MNRAS375(Mar., 2007) 1315–1324, [astro-ph/0612277]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  71. [84]

    S. J. Kleinman, S. O. Kepler, D. Koester, I. Pelisoli, V. Pe¸ canha, A. Nitta et al.,SDSS DR7 White Dwarf Catalog, ApJS204(Jan., 2013) 5, [1212.1222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [85]

    P. E. Tremblay, J. Cummings, J. S. Kalirai, B. T. G¨ ansicke, N. Gentile-Fusillo and R. Raddi,The field white dwarf mass distribution, MNRAS461(Sept., 2016) 2100–2114, [1606.05292]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [86]

    et al.,A hidden population of white dwarfs with atmospheric carbon traces in the gaia bifurcation,A&A674(2023) A213

    Camisassa, Maria, Torres, Santiago, Hollands, Mark, Koester, Detlev, Raddi, Roberto, Althaus, Leandro G. et al.,A hidden population of white dwarfs with atmospheric carbon traces in the gaia bifurcation,A&A674(2023) A213

    2023

  74. [87]

    M. W. O’Brien, P.-E. Tremblay, B. L. Klein, D. Koester, C. Melis, A. B´ edard et al.,The 40 pc sample of white dwarfs from gaia,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527(Nov., 2023) 8687–8705

    2023

  75. [88]

    A., Jordan, S., Mander, C., Bergeron, P

    Vincent, O., Barstow, M. A., Jordan, S., Mander, C., Bergeron, P. and Dufour, P., Classification and parameterization of a large gaia sample of white dwarfs using xp spectra, A&A682(2024) A5

    2024

  76. [89]

    Frohmaier, M

    C. Frohmaier, M. Sullivan, P. E. Nugent, M. Smith, G. Dimitriadis, J. S. Bloom et al.,The volumetric rate of normal type Ia supernovae in the local Universe discovered by the Palomar Transient Factory, MNRAS486(June, 2019) 2308–2320, [1903.08580]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  77. [90]

    D. A. Perley, C. Fremling, J. Sollerman, A. A. Miller, A. S. Dahiwale, Y. Sharma et al., The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. II. A Public Statistical Sample for Exploring Supernova Demographics, ApJ904(Nov., 2020) 35, [2009.01242]. – 47 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [91]

    Sharon and D

    A. Sharon and D. Kushnir,The ZTF-BTS Type Ia supernovae luminosity function is consistent with a single progenitor channel for the explosions, MNRAS509(Feb., 2022) 5275–5297, [2109.06219]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  79. [92]

    S. F. Portegies Zwart and F. Verbunt,Population synthesis of high-mass binaries., A&A 309(May, 1996) 179–196

    1996

  80. [93]

    Kroupa,On the variation of the initial mass function, MNRAS322(Apr., 2001) 231–246, [astro-ph/0009005]

    P. Kroupa,On the variation of the initial mass function, MNRAS322(Apr., 2001) 231–246, [astro-ph/0009005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

Showing first 80 references.