Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

This paper constructs the first complete Dirac tensor bases for J=4 and J=5 meson Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes and uses them to predict ground-state masses that lie on linear Regge trajectories across all flavor sectors.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 06:57 UTC pith:7XG7O2YW

load-bearing objection Useful technical step for continuum QCD: first explicit J=4,5 tensor bases and exploratory rainbow-ladder spectra, but the heavy-quark masses rest on an extrapolation whose quoted error bars do not cover the systematic risk. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2510.27423 v2 pith:7XG7O2YW submitted 2025-10-31 hep-ph

Spectra of light and heavy mesons with J le 5 in a relativistic Bethe-Salpeter approach

Stephan Hagel , Christian S. Fischer , Markus Q. Huber , Jonathan Y. Yigzaw This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords Bethe-Salpeter equationDyson-Schwinger equationsmeson spectrumhigh-spin mesonsJ=4 and J=5Regge trajectoriesrainbow-ladder truncationheavy quarkonia
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extends the relativistic Dyson-Schwinger/Bethe-Salpeter treatment of quark-antiquark bound states from angular momentum up to 3 out to J=4 and J=5. It builds, for the first time, complete orthonormal Dirac tensor bases for those higher-spin amplitudes, then applies them in a rainbow-ladder truncation to produce an exploratory ground-state spectrum in light, strange, hidden-strange, charm and bottom sectors. The central result is that the natural-parity sequence 1--, 2++, 3--, 4++, 5-- forms approximately linear Regge trajectories in every flavor sector, matching the measured 4++ states where data exist and predicting the previously unobserved 5-- ground states. A sympathetic reader would care because these are the first functional-QCD predictions for J=4 and J=5 quark-antiquark mesons, and they give concrete mass targets for upcoming high-spin meson spectroscopy.

Core claim

The paper provides, for the first time, complete orthonormal Dirac tensor bases for meson Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes with J=4 and J=5, and uses them in a rainbow-ladder truncation to compute an exploratory spectrum of ground states with J^PC=4++ and 5-- in light, strange, hidden-strange, charm and bottom sectors. The resulting masses fall on approximately linear Regge trajectories for the natural-parity sequence 1--, 2++, 3--, 4++, 5--, reproducing measured 4++ states where available and making new predictions such as a light isovector 5-- near 2.33 GeV and a bottomonium 5-- near 10.89 GeV. The authors also show that the rainbow-ladder description improves as quark mass increases, and that th

What carries the argument

The key machinery is a systematic construction of orthonormal tensor bases for the Bethe-Salpeter amplitude. The building blocks are a unit-normalized transverse vector built from the relative momentum, the transverse projector with respect to the total momentum, and transverse gamma matrices; symmetrizing over all Lorentz-index permutations and fixing coefficients so that the tensors are traceless yields orthonormal bases, with parity controlled by a gamma-five factor. These bases feed a Bethe-Salpeter eigenvalue equation whose eigenvalue equals one at the physical meson mass, with a continued-fraction extrapolation used to reach the mass shell when the kernel cannot be evaluated directly t

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the continued-fraction extrapolation of the Bethe-Salpeter eigenvalue down to the mass-shell point stays unbiased for high-spin and heavy states, even though the safe evaluation region does not reach the physical mass for charmonium and bottomonium.

What would settle it

A measurement of the predicted 5-- ground state in the light isovector channel near 2.33 GeV, or of the charm 5-- near 4.75 GeV, would settle the matter: if the measured state lands far outside the quoted uncertainty, the rainbow-ladder kernel or the extrapolation is biased. An independent first-principles calculation of the same 5-- charmonium state would provide a direct cross-check of the 4.75 GeV prediction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Ground-state masses for J^PC=4++ and 5-- mesons are predicted in all five flavor sectors, including a kaonic 5-- near 2.38 GeV, a charm 5-- near 4.75 GeV, and a bottom 5-- near 10.89 GeV, giving direct experimental targets.
  • The natural-parity sequence 1--, 2++, 3--, 4++, 5-- is approximately linear in squared mass versus angular momentum for light, strange, hidden-strange, charm and bottom quarks, with slopes growing from about 1.2 GeV^2 in the light sector to about 7.2 GeV^2 for bottomonium.
  • Where 4++ states are already measured, the calculation agrees, which strengthens the case that the predicted 5-- masses are credible predictions rather than mere extrapolation artifacts.
  • The rainbow-ladder truncation is confirmed to be progressively more reliable for heavier quarks, while light scalar, axialvector and radially excited states remain poorly described and will require more complete interaction kernels.
  • The interaction model's momentum-space coupling yields a nearly linear rising part in the extracted potential at intermediate distances, giving a concrete, though model-internal, explanation for why Regge trajectories appear despite no explicit confinement input.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the new tensor bases are purely kinematical, they can be reused as-is in beyond-rainbow-ladder calculations or in other bound-state frameworks; the hard part of deriving complete J=4 and J=5 amplitudes is done once.
  • The heavy-state predictions offer a sharp test of the extrapolation procedure: if a measured charmonium or bottomonium 5-- disagrees with the quoted uncertainties, the most likely source of error is the analytic continuation of the eigenvalue curve, not the tensor basis itself.
  • The near-linear Regge slope may be a more robust observable than individual masses: even if more complete kernels shift absolute values, the slope could survive, making it a useful benchmark for comparing interaction models.
  • A testable extension would be to apply the same effective interaction in a beyond-rainbow-ladder truncation to just the natural-parity channel; if the linear trajectory persists, the physics behind it is tied to the shape of the effective coupling rather than to details of the truncation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the rainbow-ladder Dyson-Schwinger/Bethe-Salpeter (DSE/BSE) framework to mesons with total angular momentum J=4 and J=5. Its main technical novelty is the construction of orthonormal Dirac tensor bases for these channels, presented in Tables 6 and 7, satisfying transversality, symmetry, tracelessness, and parity. Using the Maris-Tandy (MT) and Qin-Chang (QC) effective interactions, the authors compute ground-state masses for many J^PC channels in the light, strange, hidden-strange, charmonium, and bottomonium sectors. They identify a natural-parity Regge trajectory 1--, 2++, 3--, 4++, 5-- and give new predictions for 4++ and 5-- masses in all flavour sectors, comparing with available PDG data and discussing known limitations of rainbow-ladder truncation.

Significance. If the tensor-basis construction is complete, it is a useful technical step for continuum studies of high-spin mesons, and the J=4,5 mass predictions are the first of their kind from this framework. The paper is appropriately cautious: it labels the heavy-quark results as exploratory, acknowledges the known failures of rainbow-ladder in scalar and axial-vector channels, and does not fit the J=4,5 states. The explicit tensor tables, parameter values, and comparison with experiment are strengths that make the calculation reproducible and testable. However, the central quantitative claims in the heavy-quark sector rest on an extrapolation whose systematic uncertainty is not quantified, and the advertised new bases are not proven to be complete. These issues need to be addressed before the results can be fully relied upon.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix B, Tables 6-7] The paper asserts that the eight tensors listed for J=4 and J=5 form a basis for the Bethe-Salpeter amplitude satisfying transversality, symmetry, tracelessness, and parity. Orthonormality is checked, but completeness of the set is never proven. Since these tables are the paper's main technical novelty, a dimension count or a constructive spanning argument is needed: show that the space of Dirac-valued rank-J Lorentz tensors with the imposed constraints has the same dimension as the number of tensors listed, and that the listed tensors span that space. Without this, a missing tensor structure would change the BSE and the resulting masses.
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Appendix A, Figs. 5-6, Tab. 2] For charmonium and bottomonium, the safe evaluation region 'does not exceed the lightest ground states' and the eigenvalue lambda(P^2) is extrapolated 'further towards larger masses' via the Schlessinger continued fraction. All J=3,4,5 heavy-quark masses are obtained this way. The quoted errors, e.g. ±115 MeV for the c-cbar 5-- state and ±75 MeV for the b-bbar 5-- state, are resampling standard deviations over subsets of the sampled P^2 points; they do not include the systematic error of the continued-fraction ansatz through the complex quark-propagator singularities discussed in Appendix A. Because the Regge slopes in Fig. 7 and Table 2 are extracted from these same extrapolated masses, the central quantitative claim of linear heavy-quark Regge trajectories depends on this unquantified systematic. Please provide evidence that the extrapolation is unbiased, for example by comparing Schle
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption] The state referred to as 'eta_c1(3872)' should presumably be X(3872)/chi_c1(3872), since the X(3872) has J^PC=1++.
  2. [Sec. 3, last paragraph] 'without recurse to any non-relativistic approximations' should read 'without recourse'.
  3. [Appendix B.2.6] The role of the conjugate tensors \bar{tau}_i and the signs in Tables 3-7 is not explained. If these signs encode charge-conjugation parity, this should be stated explicitly, since the spectra are labelled with J^PC rather than J^P alone.
  4. [Eq. (B.10)] The notation for the J=0 and J>0 basis sets is ambiguous: it looks like a Cartesian product of sets. Please clarify that for J=0 there are no Lorentz indices and the listed factors are the Dirac-space building blocks.
  5. [Sec. 4.1, QC paragraph] 'numerical problems with QC did prevent us from extracting a spectrum beyond J=2' should be 'prevented us'. Also, the statement that the QC potential is 'much broader' would benefit from a quantitative reference to Fig. 1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: J=4,5 predictions are genuine model outputs; only minor self-citation for parameter choices.

full rationale

The central new results (J=4,5 ground-state masses) are solutions of the rainbow-ladder Bethe-Salpeter equation with the tensor bases constructed in Appendix B, and are not identified with any fitted input. Quark masses are fixed to the pion, kaon, J/ψ and Υ masses (Sec. 2.1, Table 1), and the paper does not present those fitted masses as predictions; the new 3--, 4++, 5-- masses for each flavor are extrapolated/mass-shell evaluated outputs, not inputs. The heavy-quark parameter η is taken from the same authors' earlier Ref. [47] ('the model parameter η fixed in Ref. [47]'), which is a self-citation, but it is a parameter choice rather than a result being 'predicted' here, and the new higher-spin masses still carry independent content. The χ_c2/χ_b2 comparisons are validation checks, not fitted predictions in this paper, and even if η was adjusted in prior work any such fit does not directly determine the J=4,5 states. The Regge trajectories in Fig. 7 and Table 2 are linear fits to the computed masses, a quantitative check of the output rather than an input-to-output equivalence. The Schlessinger extrapolation (Appendix A) is a numerical continuation of λ(P^2); its systematic uncertainty for heavy high-spin states is a correctness/reliability concern, not a circular step, and the paper explicitly acknowledges the safe-region limitation ('the momentum region where we can evaluate the Bethe-Salpeter equation safely does not exceed the lightest ground states'). No equation reduces a prediction to an input by construction, and no load-bearing argument collapses to a self-citation chain. Hence no significant circularity; score 2 only for the minor self-citation in fixing η for the heavy-quark sector.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

9 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central computation takes quark masses and effective-coupling parameters from fits to external meson masses; the new content is the J=4,5 tensor bases and the high-J spectra. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are postulated. Regge intercepts and slopes are outputs of fits to the computed masses, not free inputs.

free parameters (9)
  • light quark mass m_u/d = 0.0037 GeV
    Fitted so the charged pion mass is reproduced (Sec. 2.1, Table 1).
  • strange quark mass m_s = 0.085 GeV
    Fitted to the charged kaon mass (Table 1).
  • charm quark mass m_c = 0.830 GeV
    Fitted to the J/psi mass (Table 1, Sec. 4.1).
  • bottom quark mass m_b = 3.765 GeV
    Fitted to the Upsilon(1S) mass (Table 1, Sec. 4.1).
  • MT width eta for light/strange = 1.8
    Infrared shape parameter of the Maris-Tandy effective coupling; adopted from prior work and affecting all light and strange spectra.
  • MT width eta_charm = 1.157
    Adjusted for charmonium in Ref. [47]; controls the chi_c2 agreement.
  • MT width eta_bottom = 1.1
    Adjusted for bottomonium; controls the chi_b2 agreement.
  • MT scale Lambda = 0.72 GeV
    Set via matching the pion decay constant (Table 1 and Sec. 2.1).
  • QC parameters eta_QC and Lambda_QC = 1.741, 0.696 GeV
    Alternative effective-coupling parameters used for light mesons up to J=2; not used for the main J=4,5 results.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Rainbow-ladder truncation with one effective gluon exchange (Eq. 10) preserves chiral Ward-Takahashi identities and is quantitatively adequate for natural-parity high-J ground states.
    Invoked throughout Secs. 2 and 4; the paper itself documents failures in scalar and axial-vector channels.
  • ad hoc to paper The eight tensors constructed per J^P channel in Appendix B form a complete basis for the Bethe-Salpeter amplitude satisfying the Fierz constraints.
    Asserted in Sec. B.2 without a completeness proof or dimension count; all calculated masses depend on restricting the amplitude to this basis.
  • domain assumption The BSE eigenvalue lambda(P^2) can be continued by the Schlessinger rational function from safe P^2 values to the mass-shell pole lambda(-m^2)=1 even though the quark propagator has complex singularities in that region.
    Used for all heavy states and high-J states; error bars from resampling assume the analytic continuation is stable (Appendix A).
  • domain assumption Quark masses and effective-coupling parameters fitted to pi, K, J/psi, and Upsilon remain valid for high-J states and other flavor sectors.
    Table 1; all predictions inherit these inputs.
  • domain assumption The Fourier transform of the rainbow-ladder kernel gives a meaningful static heavy-quark potential for illustration.
    Sec. 3; the authors explicitly state this potential is not used to determine the spectra.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 20705 in / 18553 out tokens · 164817 ms · 2026-08-04T06:57:12.129731+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We extend the range of application of the relativistic Dyson-Schwinger/Bethe-Salpeter approach from previously discussed mesons with total angular momentum $J \le 3$ to the ones with $J=4,5$. On a technical level, the new element is the general Dirac tensor representations for the latter which, to our knowledge, are presented here for the first time. As a first application, we provide an exploratory spectrum for these mesons in a rainbow-ladder truncation of Dyson-Schwinger and Bethe-Salpeter equations. We discuss the merits and limitations of this truncation and explore the shape of the heavy-quark potential corresponding to the underlying effective running coupling. With our predictions for the masses of ground state mesons with quantum numbers $J^{PC}=3^{--}, 4^{++}, 5^{--}$ we identify Regge trajectories in channels where the interaction model can be trusted on a semi-quantitative level. In other channels, discrepancies with experiments confirm the well-known need to go beyond rainbow-ladder in the Dyson-Schwinger/Bethe-Salpeter approach by using more sophisticated interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.27423 by Christian S. Fischer, Jonathan Y. Yigzaw, Markus Q. Huber, Stephan Hagel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left panel: Interaction potentials obtained via Fourier transformation of effective running couplings. The MT potential has a (positive) maximum around r = 1.6 fm and approaches zero from the positive side while the QC potential approaches zero monotonously. Right panel: The contributions of the infrared and ultraviolet parts of the effective running coupling to the MT potential. 3 Interaction potentials I… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spectrum of qq¯ states obtained from a rainbow-ladder truncation with the Maris-Tandy and Qin-Chang models compared to the experimental spectrum in the isovector channel [35]. ultraviolet logarithmic part of the effective running cou￾pling is responsible for the short distance Coulomb type behaviour of the potentials, whereas the infrared expo￾nential parts of the effective running couplings generate the n… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spectrum of states with one light and one strange (anti-)quark obtained from a rainbow-ladder truncation with the Maris-Tandy model compared to the experimental kaon spectrum [35]. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 0-+ 1-- 0++ 1+- 1++ 2++ 2-- 2-+ 3-- 3+- 3++ 4++ 4-- 4-+ 5-- 5+- 5++ PDG (I=0, ss- , established) PDG (I=0, ss- , non-established) Rainbow-ladder (Maris-Tandy) Mass [GeV] J PC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectrum of ss¯ states obtained from a rainbow-ladder truncation with the Maris-Tandy model compared to the experimental isoscalar spectrum [35]. 4 Results 4.1 Meson spectra The results for the spectrum of mesons composed of light quarks is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Charmonium spectrum obtained from a rainbow-ladder truncation with the Maris-Tandy model and η = 1.16 compared to experimental data [35]. Note that potential tetraquark candidates such as the ηc1(3872) are not included. 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 0-+ 1-- 0++ 1+- 1++ 2++ 2-- 2-+ 3-- 3+- 3++ 4++ 4-- 4-+ 5-- 5+- 5++ PDG (bb- , established) Rainbow-ladder (Maris-Tandy) Mass [GeV] J PC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bottomonium spectrum obtained from a rainbow-ladder truncation with the Maris-Tandy model and η = 1.1 compared to experimental data [35]. reasons. In the scalar channel, the ground state is not a conventional quark-antiquark state, but a four-quark state with a strong coupling to isoscalar ππ intermediate channels and only very small quark-antiquark contribu￾tions. This has been demonstrated by many approa… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Chew-Frautschi plots for different quark contents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Momentum routing in the BSE. The total mo￾mentum P is split between the two internal legs. Appendix B: Tensor bases for mesons of arbitrary angular momentum When solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation for mesons, their quantum numbers are reflected in their Bethe￾Salpeter amplitudes. Thus, if one wants to solve the BSE for arbitrary quantum numbers, one needs a way to construct a tensor basis with the corresp… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Real poles with opposite-sign residues in the non-perturbative quark propagator

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Full quark-gluon vertex dynamics in the gap equation yields real poles with opposite-sign residues and a 350 MeV constituent mass, unlike prior approximations that produce complex poles.

  2. Light mesons in the symmetric-vertex approximation

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A dressed quark-gluon vertex computed in the symmetric approximation yields light-meson masses that match experiment more closely than rainbow-ladder results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 44 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [3]

    Strange-Meson Spectroscopy – from COMPASS to AMBER

    COMP ASS, AMBERCollaboration, S. Wallner, “Strange-Meson Spectroscopy – from COMPASS to AMBER”,EPJ Web Conf.274(2022) 03010, arXiv:2211.09499 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  2. [4]

    QCD and Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives

    N. Brambillaet al., “QCD and Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives”, Eur. Phys. J.C74no. 10, (2014) 2981, arXiv:1404.3723 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [5]

    On the Representation theory of inhomogeneous Lorentz groups as the foundation of quantum mechanical kinematics

    H. Joos, “On the Representation theory of inhomogeneous Lorentz groups as the foundation of quantum mechanical kinematics”,Fortsch. Phys. 10(1962) 65–146

    1962

  4. [6]

    Feynman Rules for Any Spin

    S. Weinberg, “Feynman Rules for Any Spin”,Phys. Rev.133(1964) B1318–B1332

    1964

  5. [7]

    Determination of the Spins and Parities of Resonances

    C. Zemach, “Determination of the Spins and Parities of Resonances”,Phys. Rev.140(1965) B109–B124

    1965

  6. [8]

    A covariant study of tensor mesons

    A. Krassnigg and M. Blank, “A covariant study of tensor mesons”,Phys. Rev.D83(2011) 096006, arXiv:1011.6650 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  7. [9]

    Mass spectra and Regge trajectories of light mesons in the Bethe-Salpeter approach

    C. S. Fischer, S. Kubrak, and R. Williams, “Mass spectra and Regge trajectories of light mesons in the Bethe-Salpeter approach”,Eur. Phys. J.A50 (2014) 126,arXiv:1406.4370 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [10]

    Mesons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, “Mesons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics”,Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 189–231

    1985

  9. [11]

    Mass spectra and Regge trajectories of light mesons in the relativistic quark model

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, “Mass spectra and Regge trajectories of light mesons in the relativistic quark model”,Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 114029,arXiv:0903.5183 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [12]

    Investigation of rainbow-ladder truncation for excited and exotic mesons

    S.-x. Qin, L. Chang, Y.-x. Liu, C. D. Roberts, and D. J. Wilson, “Investigation of rainbow-ladder truncation for excited and exotic mesons”,Phys. Rev.C85(2012) 035202,arXiv:1109.3459 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [13]

    Bottomonium in a Bethe-Salpeter-equation study

    M. Blank and A. Krassnigg, “Bottomonium in a Bethe-Salpeter-equation study”,Phys. Rev.D84 (2011) 096014,arXiv:1109.6509 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  12. [14]

    Light mesons in QCD and unquenching effects from the 3PI effective action

    R. Williams, C. S. Fischer, and W. Heupel, “Light mesons in QCD and unquenching effects from the 3PI effective action”,Phys. Rev.D93no. 3, (2016) 034026,arXiv:1512.00455 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [15]

    Explanation and Prediction of Observables using Continuum Strong QCD

    I. C. Cloet and C. D. Roberts, “Explanation and Prediction of Observables using Continuum Strong QCD”,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.77(2014) 1–69, arXiv:1310.2651 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [16]

    Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states

    G. Eichmann, H. Sanchis-Alepuz, R. Williams, R. Alkofer, and C. S. Fischer, “Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states”,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.91(2016) 1–100,arXiv:1606.09602 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [17]

    Hadron physics with functional methods

    G. Eichmann, “Hadron physics with functional methods”,arXiv:2503.10397 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [18]

    A beginner’s guide to functional methods in particle physics

    M. Q. Huber, “A beginner’s guide to functional methods in particle physics”,arXiv:2510.18960 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [19]

    Correlation functions of Landau gauge Yang-Mills theory

    M. Q. Huber, “Correlation functions of Landau gauge Yang-Mills theory”,Phys. Rev. D101no. 11, (2020) 114009,arXiv:2003.13703 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [20]

    Nonperturbative properties of Yang–Mills theories

    M. Q. Huber, “Nonperturbative properties of Yang–Mills theories”,Phys. Rept.879(2020) 1–92, arXiv:1808.05227 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  19. [21]

    Spectrum of scalar and pseudoscalar glueballs from functional methods

    M. Q. Huber, C. S. Fischer, and H. Sanchis-Alepuz, “Spectrum of scalar and pseudoscalar glueballs from functional methods”,Eur. Phys. J. C80no. 11, (2020) 1077,arXiv:2004.00415 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [22]

    Higher spin glueballs from functional methods

    M. Q. Huber, C. S. Fischer, and H. Sanchis-Alepuz, “Higher spin glueballs from functional methods”, Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 12, (2021) 1083, arXiv:2110.09180 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [23]

    Apparent convergence in functional glueball calculations

    M. Q. Huber, C. S. Fischer, and H. Sanchis-Alepuz, “Apparent convergence in functional glueball calculations”,arXiv:2503.03821 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [24]

    Bethe-Salpeter study of vector meson masses and decay constants

    P. Maris and P. C. Tandy, “Bethe-Salpeter study of vector meson masses and decay constants”,Phys. Rev.C60(1999) 055214, arXiv:nucl-th/9905056 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  23. [25]

    Interaction model for the gap equation

    S.-x. Qin, L. Chang, Y.-x. Liu, C. D. Roberts, and D. J. Wilson, “Interaction model for the gap equation”,Phys. Rev.C84(2011) 042202, arXiv:1108.0603 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [26]

    QCD forces and heavy quark bound states

    G. S. Bali, “QCD forces and heavy quark bound states”,Phys. Rept.343(2001) 1–136, arXiv:hep-ph/0001312

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  25. [27]

    Potential NRQCD: An Effective theory for heavy quarkonium

    N. Brambilla, A. Pineda, J. Soto, and A. Vairo, “Potential NRQCD: An Effective theory for heavy quarkonium”,Nucl. Phys. B566(2000) 275, arXiv:hep-ph/9907240

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  26. [28]

    The QCD potential at O(1/m)

    N. Brambilla, A. Pineda, J. Soto, and A. Vairo, “The QCD potential at O(1/m)”,Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 014023,arXiv:hep-ph/0002250

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  27. [29]

    Nonperturbative determination of the QCD potential at O(1/m)

    Y. Koma, M. Koma, and H. Wittig, “Nonperturbative determination of the QCD potential at O(1/m)”,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 122003,arXiv:hep-lat/0607009 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [30]

    Spin-dependent potentials from lattice QCD

    Y. Koma and M. Koma, “Spin-dependent potentials from lattice QCD”,Nucl. Phys.B769 (2007) 79–107,arXiv:hep-lat/0609078 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  29. [31]

    Computing 1/m Q and 1/m2 Q corrections to the static potential with lattice gauge theory using gradient flow

    M. Eichberg and M. Wagner, “Computing 1/m Q and 1/m2 Q corrections to the static potential with lattice gauge theory using gradient flow”,PoS 16 LA TTICE2024(2025) 117,arXiv:2411.11640 [hep-lat]. 32.SESAMCollaboration, G. S. Bali, H. Neff, T. Duessel, T. Lippert, and K. Schilling, “Observation of string breaking in QCD”,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 114513,arXiv:h...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [33]

    Greensite,An introduction to the confinement problem, vol

    J. Greensite,An introduction to the confinement problem, vol. 821. 2011

    2011

  31. [34]

    Lattice Gluon Propagator and One-Gluon-Exchange Potential

    A. Cucchieri, T. Mendes, and W. M. Serenone, “Lattice Gluon Propagator and One-Gluon-Exchange Potential”,Braz. J. Phys.49 no. 4, (2019) 548–563,arXiv:1704.08288 [hep-lat]. 35.Particle Data GroupCollaboration, S. Navas et al., “Review of particle physics”,Phys. Rev. D 110no. 3, (2024) 030001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [36]

    Dynamically induced scalar quark confinement

    R. Alkofer, C. S. Fischer, and F. J. Llanes-Estrada, “Dynamically induced scalar quark confinement”, Mod. Phys. Lett.A23(2008) 1105, arXiv:hep-ph/0607293

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [37]

    The Quark-gluon vertex in Landau gauge QCD: Its role in dynamical chiral symmetry breaking and quark confinement

    R. Alkofer, C. S. Fischer, F. J. Llanes-Estrada, and K. Schwenzer, “The Quark-gluon vertex in Landau gauge QCD: Its role in dynamical chiral symmetry breaking and quark confinement”,Annals Phys. 324(2009) 106–172,arXiv:0804.3042 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  34. [38]

    Confinement, the Wilson Loop and the Gluon Propagator

    G. B. West, “Confinement, the Wilson Loop and the Gluon Propagator”,Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 468–472

    1982

  35. [39]

    Vector mesons as dynamical resonances in the Bethe–Salpeter framework

    R. Williams, “Vector mesons as dynamical resonances in the Bethe–Salpeter framework”, Phys. Lett. B798(2019) 134943, arXiv:1804.11161 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [40]

    σ-meson: Four-quark versus two-quark components and decay width in a Bethe-Salpeter approach

    N. Santowsky, G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, P. C. Wallbott, and R. Williams, “σ-meson: Four-quark versus two-quark components and decay width in a Bethe-Salpeter approach”,Phys. Rev. D102no. 5, (2020) 056014,arXiv:2007.06495 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [41]

    Elucidating the effect of intermediate resonances in the quark interaction kernel on the timelike electromagnetic pion form factor

    A. S. Miramontes, H. Sanchis Alepuz, and R. Alkofer, “Elucidating the effect of intermediate resonances in the quark interaction kernel on the timelike electromagnetic pion form factor”,Phys. Rev. D103no. 11, (2021) 116006, arXiv:2102.12541 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [42]

    From controversy to precision on the sigma meson: a review on the status of the non-ordinaryf 0(500) resonance

    J. R. Pelaez, “From controversy to precision on the sigma meson: a review on the status of the non-ordinaryf 0(500) resonance”, arXiv:1510.00653 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [43]

    Tetraquark Bound States in a Bethe-Salpeter Approach

    W. Heupel, G. Eichmann, and C. S. Fischer, “Tetraquark Bound States in a Bethe-Salpeter Approach”,Phys. Lett.B718(2012) 545–549, arXiv:1206.5129 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [44]

    The light scalar mesons as tetraquarks

    G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, and W. Heupel, “The light scalar mesons as tetraquarks”,Phys. Lett. B753(2016) 282–287,arXiv:1508.07178 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [45]

    Beyond Rainbow-Ladder in bound state equations

    W. Heupel, T. Goecke, and C. S. Fischer, “Beyond Rainbow-Ladder in bound state equations”,Eur. Phys. J.A50(2014) 85,arXiv:1402.5042 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [46]

    U(A)(1) anomaly and eta-prime mass from an infrared singular quark-gluon vertex

    R. Alkofer, C. S. Fischer, and R. Williams, “U(A)(1) anomaly and eta-prime mass from an infrared singular quark-gluon vertex”,Eur. Phys. J. A38(2008) 53–60,arXiv:0804.3478 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  43. [47]

    Spectra of heavy mesons in the Bethe-Salpeter approach

    C. S. Fischer, S. Kubrak, and R. Williams, “Spectra of heavy mesons in the Bethe-Salpeter approach”,Eur. Phys. J.A51(2015) 10, arXiv:1409.5076 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [48]

    Bethe-Salpeter equation at leading order in Coulomb gauge

    P. Watson and H. Reinhardt, “Bethe-Salpeter equation at leading order in Coulomb gauge”,Phys. Rev.D86(2012) 125030,arXiv:1211.4507 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [49]

    Pi- and K meson Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes

    P. Maris and C. D. Roberts, “Pi- and K meson Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes”,Phys. Rev.C56(1997) 3369–3383,arXiv:nucl-th/9708029 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  46. [50]

    Pion mass and decay constant

    P. Maris, C. D. Roberts, and P. C. Tandy, “Pion mass and decay constant”,Phys. Lett.B420(1998) 267–273,arXiv:nucl-th/9707003 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  47. [51]

    Dyson-Schwinger equations: A Tool for hadron physics

    P. Maris and C. D. Roberts, “Dyson-Schwinger equations: A Tool for hadron physics”,Int. J. Mod. Phys.E12(2003) 297–365, arXiv:nucl-th/0301049 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  48. [52]

    Analytic properties of the Landau gauge gluon and quark propagators

    R. Alkofer, W. Detmold, C. S. Fischer, and P. Maris, “Analytic properties of the Landau gauge gluon and quark propagators”,Phys. Rev.D70 (2004) 014014,arXiv:hep-ph/0309077

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  49. [53]

    Analytical properties of the quark propagator from a truncated Dyson-Schwinger equation in complex Euclidean space

    S. M. Dorkin, L. P. Kaptari, T. Hilger, and B. Kampfer, “Analytical properties of the quark propagator from a truncated Dyson-Schwinger equation in complex Euclidean space”,Phys. Rev. C89(2014) 034005,arXiv:1312.2721 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  50. [54]

    Analytic properties of the quark propagator from an effective infrared interaction model

    A. Windisch, “Analytic properties of the quark propagator from an effective infrared interaction model”,Phys. Rev.C95no. 4, (2017) 045204, arXiv:1612.06002 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [55]

    Use of Analyticity in the Calculation of Nonrelativistic Scattering Amplitudes

    L. Schlessinger, “Use of Analyticity in the Calculation of Nonrelativistic Scattering Amplitudes”,Phys. Rev.167no. 3, (1968) 1411

    1968

  52. [56]

    Force-free particles with any spin

    M. Fierz, “Force-free particles with any spin”,Helv. Phys. Acta12(1939) 3–37

    1939