pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.10735 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-13 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Constants of motion and fundamental frequencies for elliptic orbits at fourth post-Newtonian order

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords post-Newtonian orderelliptic orbitsfundamental frequenciestail contributionscompact binary systemsredshift invariantgravitational wave fluxesaction-angle formulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

The paper derives the map between energy, angular momentum and radial, azimuthal frequencies for nonspinning compact binaries on quasi-elliptic orbits at fourth post-Newtonian order.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper obtains the conservative relation linking the energy and angular momentum of a compact binary system to its fundamental orbital frequencies at fourth post-Newtonian order. The map accounts for both instantaneous gravitational interactions and tail contributions from wave propagation, and is formulated using a resummed function of orbital eccentricity to maintain validity across all eccentricities. It recovers the established results for circular orbits as a special case. These relations matter because the frequencies govern the phase evolution of gravitational waveforms emitted during the inspiral of binary systems.

Core claim

In the case of nonspinning compact binary systems on quasi-elliptic orbits, the conservative map between the constants of motion (energy and angular momentum) and the fundamental (radial and azimuthal) frequencies is obtained at the fourth post-Newtonian order, including both instantaneous and tail contributions. This map is expressed in terms of an enhancement function of the eccentricity, which is appropriately resummed to ensure accuracy for any eccentricity. The local dynamics are expressed using an action-angle formulation, with the tail term treated as a perturbation that is localized in time and then Delaunay-averaged via a controlled contact transformation of the phase-space variable

What carries the argument

The conservative map between constants of motion and fundamental frequencies, expressed via a resummed eccentricity enhancement function at fourth post-Newtonian order.

If this is right

  • The map recovers known results for circular orbits.
  • The orbit-averaged redshift invariant for eccentric orbits at fourth post-Newtonian order agrees with analytical self-force calculations when tail contributions are included.
  • The energy and angular momentum fluxes obtained at third post-Newtonian order are re-expressed in terms of the fundamental frequencies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These frequency maps could enable more precise modeling of gravitational wave signals from eccentric inspirals in current and future detectors.
  • Similar techniques might extend to higher post-Newtonian orders or to systems with spin.
  • Agreement with self-force results suggests consistency between perturbative approaches in the post-Newtonian and post-geodesic regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The tail term can be treated as a perturbation which is first localized in time, then Delaunay-averaged, both operations requiring a contact transformation of the phase-space variables that is explicitly controlled.

What would settle it

A direct numerical computation of the fundamental frequencies from the 4PN equations of motion for a specific eccentric orbit and comparison against the analytical map provided.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.10735 by David Trestini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the case of nonspinning compact binary systems on quasi-elliptic orbits, I obtain the conservative map between the constants of motion (energy and angular momentum) and the fundamental (radial and azimuthal) frequencies at the fourth post-Newtonian order, including both instantaneous and tail contributions. This map is expressed in terms of an enhancement function of the eccentricity, which is appropriately resummed to ensure accuracy for any eccentricity; in particular, I recover known results for circular orbits. In order to obtain this map, the local dynamics are expressed using an action-angle formulation. The tail term is treated as a perturbation, which is first localized in time, then Delaunay-averaged. Both operations require a contact transformation of the phase-space variables, which I explicitly control. Using the first law of binary black hole mechanics, I then obtain the orbit-averaged redshift invariant for eccentric orbits at fourth post-Newtonian order; when properly accounting for the tail contributions, it perfectly agrees with analytical self-force at postgeodesic order [arXiv:2203.13832]. Finally, I use these results to re-express the fluxes of energy and angular momentum obtained at third post-Newtonian order in [arXiv:0711.0302] and [arXiv:0908.3854] in terms of fundamental frequencies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to obtain the conservative map between the constants of motion (energy and angular momentum) and the fundamental (radial and azimuthal) frequencies at the fourth post-Newtonian order for nonspinning compact binaries on quasi-elliptic orbits. This includes instantaneous and tail contributions, expressed via a resummed enhancement function of the eccentricity. The derivation uses an action-angle formulation where the tail term is localized in time and Delaunay-averaged through an explicitly controlled contact transformation. Validation is achieved using the first law of binary black hole mechanics, showing perfect agreement with analytical self-force results at postgeodesic order, and the results are applied to re-express 3PN fluxes of energy and angular momentum in terms of fundamental frequencies.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, this provides an important extension of post-Newtonian results to 4PN for eccentric orbits, with direct applications to gravitational wave data analysis for eccentric systems. Strengths include the explicit control of the contact transformation, the use of the first law for validation, and the agreement with independent self-force calculations, which lends credibility to the frequency map. The resummed form of the enhancement function ensures utility for arbitrary eccentricities, and the re-expression of fluxes adds practical value.

major comments (1)
  1. The derivation of the frequency map at exactly 4PN order depends on the contact transformation that localizes the nonlocal tail term and performs the Delaunay average. While the manuscript asserts explicit control over this transformation, the potential for missing higher-order secular contributions (such as O(tail^2) or resonant terms generated during localization) that could affect the 4PN accuracy of the eccentricity enhancement function, especially for non-zero eccentricity, requires further elaboration or explicit verification to fully support the central claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. Consider specifying the particular known circular orbit results that are recovered to enhance clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the importance of the 4PN conservative frequency map for eccentric orbits and the validation against self-force results. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested elaboration.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The derivation of the frequency map at exactly 4PN order depends on the contact transformation that localizes the nonlocal tail term and performs the Delaunay average. While the manuscript asserts explicit control over this transformation, the potential for missing higher-order secular contributions (such as O(tail^2) or resonant terms generated during localization) that could affect the 4PN accuracy of the eccentricity enhancement function, especially for non-zero eccentricity, requires further elaboration or explicit verification to fully support the central claim.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this insightful comment on the control of the contact transformation. In the derivation, the nonlocal tail contribution at 4PN is localized via a time-dependent canonical transformation generated by a function that is constructed order-by-order in the post-Newtonian expansion. This generator is chosen to cancel the nonlocal integrals while preserving the action-angle structure. The subsequent Delaunay averaging is then performed on the resulting local Hamiltonian. Because the tail enters the conservative dynamics precisely at 4PN, any quadratic tail contributions (O(tail²)) appear only at 8PN and lie beyond the accuracy of the present calculation. Resonant or secular terms generated during localization are systematically removed by the canonical nature of the transformation; their absence at 4PN is verified by direct computation of the Poisson brackets and the transformed Hamiltonian up to the required order. The procedure holds for arbitrary eccentricity because the enhancement function is obtained after averaging and is resummed in eccentricity. To fully address the referee’s request, we will expand the relevant section of the revised manuscript with an explicit expression for the generating function of the contact transformation and a short appendix verifying that no 4PN secular drifts arise from the localization step. This addition will supply the explicit verification needed while leaving the central results unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation grounded in first law and independent validation

full rationale

The paper derives the conservative map between (E, L) and fundamental frequencies at 4PN by expressing local dynamics in action-angle variables, treating the tail as a perturbation that is localized then Delaunay-averaged via an explicitly controlled contact transformation, and applying the first law of binary black hole mechanics to obtain the orbit-averaged redshift. The result is validated by exact agreement with independent analytical self-force calculations at postgeodesic order. No quoted step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for a uniqueness claim, or renames a known result as a new derivation. The central map therefore remains independent of internal fitting or self-referential definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions of general relativity and the post-Newtonian expansion for nonspinning compact binaries; no new free parameters, ad-hoc entities, or fitted constants are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Validity of the post-Newtonian expansion for conservative dynamics of nonspinning compact binaries
    Invoked throughout to reach fourth post-Newtonian order.
  • domain assumption Quasi-elliptic orbits admit an action-angle formulation with well-defined fundamental frequencies
    Basis for expressing the local dynamics before perturbation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1381 out tokens · 45506 ms · 2026-05-17T21:58:26.764780+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    105 8 − 33 8 ν+ 3ν 2 +δ −105 8 + 33 8 ν # + 1 j3/2

    is associated with the velocity 3-vectorv i 1 of the first particle, as well as the regularized value of the metric on the first particle (gαβ)1 [the regularization procedure was historically Hadamard regularization, then was promoted to dimensional regularization]. Once orbit-averaged, the redshift invariant was shown to be linked, in a variational sense...

  2. [2]

    (2.32) and (2.33) for their definition

    Expressions forA,B,C, andD n The coefficients entering the local expression forp 2 r =I(1/r) are given here explicitly in terms of energy and angular momentum at 4PN order; see Eqs. (2.32) and (2.33) for their definition. A=−c 2m2εν2 ( 1 +ε −1 4 + 3 4 ν +ε 2 − ν 8 + ν2 2 +ε 3 − 5 64 ν2 + 5 16 ν3 +ε 4 − 3 64 ν3 + 3 16 ν4 ) (D1a) B=Gm 3ν2 ( 1 +ε −2 + ν 2 +ε...

  3. [3]

    (2.29) for their definition

    Expressions forA,B,C,D n,F, andI n The coefficients entering the local expressions for ˙r2 =R(1/r) and ˙ϕ=S(1/r) are given here explicitly in terms of energy and angular momentum at 4PN order; see Eqs. (2.29) for their definition. A=−c 2ε ( 1 +ε 3 4 − 9 4 ν +ε 2 1 2 − 19 8 ν+ 2ν 2 +ε 3 5 16 −2ν+ 211 64 ν2 − 7 8 ν3 +ε 4 3 16 − 3ν 2 + 117 32 ν2 − 21 8 ν3 + ...

  4. [4]

    Romero-Shaw, J

    I. Romero-Shaw, J. Stegmann, H. Tagawa, D. Gerosa, J. Samsing, N. Gupte, and S. R. Green, Phys. Rev. D112, 063052 (2025), arXiv:2506.17105 [astro-ph.HE]

  5. [5]

    Morras, G

    G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, (2025), arXiv:2503.15393 [astro-ph.HE]

  6. [6]

    M. d. L. Planas, S. Husa, A. Ramos-Buades, and J. Valencia, (2025), arXiv:2506.01760 [astro-ph.HE]

  7. [7]

    Jan, B.-J

    A. Jan, B.-J. Tsao, R. O’Shaughnessy, D. Shoemaker, and P. Laguna, (2025), arXiv:2508.12460 [gr-qc]

  8. [8]

    Kacanja, K

    K. Kacanja, K. Soni, and A. H. Nitz, (2025), arXiv:2508.00179 [gr-qc]

  9. [9]

    Zevin, I

    M. Zevin, I. M. Romero-Shaw, K. Kremer, E. Thrane, and P. D. Lasky, Astrophys. J. Lett.921, L43 (2021), arXiv:2106.09042 [astro-ph.HE]

  10. [10]

    C. L. Rodriguez, P. Amaro-Seoane, S. Chatterjee, and F. A. Rasio, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 151101 (2018), arXiv:1712.04937 [astro-ph.HE]

  11. [11]

    Dall’Amico, M

    M. Dall’Amico, M. Mapelli, S. Torniamenti, and M. A. Sedda, Astron. Astrophys.683, A186 (2024), arXiv:2303.07421 [astro-ph.HE]

  12. [12]

    Samsing, I

    J. Samsing, I. Bartos, D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, B. Kocsis, N. W. C. Leigh, B. Liu, M. E. Pessah, and H. Tagawa, Nature603, 237 (2022), arXiv:2010.09765 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [13]

    I. M. Romero-Shaw, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.490, 5210 (2019), arXiv:1909.05466 [astro-ph.HE]

  14. [14]

    Saini, Mon

    P. Saini, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528, 833 (2024), arXiv:2308.07565 [astro-ph.HE]

  15. [15]

    Post-Newtonian Evolution of Massive Black Hole Triplets in Galactic Nuclei: IV. Implications for LISA

    M. Bonetti, A. Sesana, F. Haardt, E. Barausse, and M. Colpi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486, 4044 (2019), arXiv:1812.01011 [astro-ph.GA]

  16. [16]

    Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    N. Afshordiet al.(LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group), Living Rev. Rel.28, 9 (2025), arXiv:2311.01300 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    Honet, A

    L. Honet, A. Pound, and G. Comp` ere, (2025), arXiv:2510.16114 [gr-qc]

  18. [18]

    Honet, J

    L. Honet, J. Mathews, G. Comp` ere, A. Pound, B. Wardell, G. A. Piovano, M. van de Meent, and N. Warburton, (2025), arXiv:2510.16112 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Divyajyotiet al., (2025), arXiv:2510.04332 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]
  21. [21]

    Nonlocal-in-time action for the fourth post-Newtonian conservative dynamics of two-body systems

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D89, 064058 (2014), arXiv:1401.4548 [gr-qc]. 56

  22. [22]

    Fourth post-Newtonian effective one-body dynamics

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D91, 084024 (2015), arXiv:1502.07245 [gr-qc]

  23. [23]

    Conservative dynamics of two-body systems at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation of general relativity

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D93, 084014 (2016), arXiv:1601.01283 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    Energy and periastron advance of compact binaries on circular orbits at the fourth post-Newtonian order

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, A. Boh´ e, G. Faye, and S. Marsat, Phys. Rev. D95, 044026 (2017), arXiv:1610.07934 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Dimensional regularization of the IR divergences in the Fokker action of point-particle binaries at the fourth post-Newtonian order

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, A. Boh´ e, G. Faye, and S. Marsat, Phys. Rev. D96, 104043 (2017), arXiv:1706.08480 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Center-of-Mass Equations of Motion and Conserved Integrals of Compact Binary Systems at the Fourth Post-Newtonian Order

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and T. Marchand, Phys. Rev. D97, 044037 (2018), arXiv:1711.00283 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Sch¨ afer, Nuovo Cim. B101, 127 (1988)

  28. [28]

    Sch¨ afer and N

    G. Sch¨ afer and N. Wex, Phys. Lett. A174, 196 (1993), [Erratum: Phys. Lett. A177, 461 (1993)]

  29. [29]

    Third post-Newtonian accurate generalized quasi-Keplerian parametrization for compact binaries in eccentric orbits

    R.-M. Memmesheimer, A. Gopakumar, and G. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D70, 104011 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407049

  30. [30]

    G. Cho, S. Tanay, A. Gopakumar, and H. M. Lee, Phys. Rev. D105, 064010 (2022), arXiv:2110.09608 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D102, 024061 (2020), arXiv:2004.05407 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D102, 084047 (2020), arXiv:2007.11239 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D102, 024062 (2020), arXiv:2003.11891 [gr-qc]

  34. [34]

    The First Law of Binary Black Hole Mechanics in General Relativity and Post-Newtonian Theory

    A. Le Tiec, L. Blanchet, and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D85, 064039 (2012), arXiv:1111.5378 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    First Law of Mechanics for Compact Binaries on Eccentric Orbits

    A. Le Tiec, Phys. Rev. D92, 084021 (2015), arXiv:1506.05648 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    First Law of Compact Binary Mechanics with Gravitational-Wave Tails

    L. Blanchet and A. Le Tiec, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 164001 (2017), arXiv:1702.06839 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    First Law of Mechanics for Black Hole Binaries with Spins

    L. Blanchet, A. Buonanno, and A. Le Tiec, Phys. Rev. D87, 024030 (2013), arXiv:1211.1060 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Munna and C

    C. Munna and C. R. Evans, Phys. Rev. D106, 044004 (2022), arXiv:2203.13832 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and M. S. S. Qusailah, Phys. Rev. D77, 064034 (2008), arXiv:0711.0250 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and M. S. S. Qusailah, Phys. Rev. D77, 064035 (2008), arXiv:0711.0302 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and S. Sinha, Phys. Rev. D80, 124018 (2009), arXiv:0908.3854 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Rel.27, 4 (2024), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

  43. [43]

    The ancillary fileSupplementary Material.wlcontains various results in machine-readable (Wolfram Language) format. Some of the results in the Supplemental Material are not presented in the main article; in particular, it contains the complete local 4PN expressions for the Hamiltonian (2.24), the radial momentum (2.26a), the angular momentum (2.26b)- (2.28...

  44. [44]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D37, 1410 (1988)

  45. [45]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A320, 379 (1986)

  46. [46]

    Fokker action of non-spinning compact binaries at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, A. Boh´ e, G. Faye, and S. Marsat, Phys. Rev. D93, 084037 (2016), arXiv:1512.02876 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    Ambiguity-Free Completion of the Equations of Motion of Compact Binary Systems at the Fourth Post-Newtonian Order

    T. Marchand, L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, and G. Faye, Phys. Rev. D97, 044023 (2018), arXiv:1707.09289 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    Tail terms in gravitational radiation reaction via effective field theory

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D87, 044056 (2013), arXiv:1111.5488 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, R. A. Porto, and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D93, 124010 (2016), arXiv:1511.07379 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Sch¨ afer, Gen. Rel. Grav.17, 879 (1985)

  51. [51]

    B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell, Can. J. Phys.58, 1659 (1980)

  52. [52]

    Hadamard,Le probl` eme de Cauchy et les ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles lin´ eaires hyperboliques(Hermann, Paris, 1932)

    J. Hadamard,Le probl` eme de Cauchy et les ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles lin´ eaires hyperboliques(Hermann, Paris, 1932)

  53. [53]

    Hadamard Regularization

    L. Blanchet and G. Faye, J. Math. Phys.41, 7675 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0004008

  54. [54]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and D. Trestini, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 065015 (2025), arXiv:2407.18295 [gr-qc]

  55. [55]

    Blanchet, D

    L. Blanchet, D. Langlois, and E. Ligout, (2025), arXiv:2505.01278 [gr-qc]

  56. [56]

    Gravitational Self-Force Correction to the Innermost Stable Circular Equatorial Orbit of a Kerr Black Hole

    S. Isoyama, L. Barack, S. R. Dolan, A. Le Tiec, H. Nakano, A. G. Shah, T. Tanaka, and N. Warburton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 161101 (2014), arXiv:1404.6133 [gr-qc]

  57. [57]

    Hamiltonian Formulation of the Conservative Self-Force Dynamics in the Kerr Geometry

    R. Fujita, S. Isoyama, A. Le Tiec, H. Nakano, N. Sago, and T. Tanaka, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 134001 (2017), arXiv:1612.02504 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    "Flux-balance formulae" for extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    S. Isoyama, R. Fujita, H. Nakano, N. Sago, and T. Tanaka, PTEP2019, 013E01 (2019), arXiv:1809.11118 [gr-qc]

  59. [59]

    F. M. Blanco and ´E. ´E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 051201 (2023), arXiv:2205.01667 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    F. M. Blanco and ´E. ´E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D107, 124017 (2023), arXiv:2302.10233 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    F. M. Blanco, Phys. Rev. D110, 024061 (2024), arXiv:2406.00106 [gr-qc]

  62. [62]

    Lewis, T

    J. Lewis, T. Kakehi, A. Pound, and T. Tanaka, (2025), arXiv:2507.08081 [gr-qc]

  63. [63]

    Schafer, Phys

    G. Schafer, Phys. Lett. A100, 128 (1984)

  64. [64]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Schaefer, J. Math. Phys.32, 127 (1991)

  65. [65]

    Dynamical invariants for general relativistic two-body systems at the third post-Newtonian approximation

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D62, 044024 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9912092

  66. [66]

    Goldstein, C

    H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko,Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Addison Wesley, 2001)

  67. [67]

    Delaunay,Th´ eorie du mouvement de la lune, Vol

    C.-E. Delaunay,Th´ eorie du mouvement de la lune, Vol. 1 (Mallet-Bachelier, imprimeur-libraire des comptes rendus hebdomabdaires des s´ eances de l’acad´ emie des Sciences, 1860)

  68. [68]

    Delaunay,Th´ eorie du mouvement de la lune, Vol

    C.-E. Delaunay,Th´ eorie du mouvement de la lune, Vol. 2 (Gauthier-Villars, imprimeur-libraire des comptes rendus hebdomabdaires des s´ eances de l’acad´ emie des Sciences, 1867)

  69. [69]

    Sommerfeld,Atombau und Spektrallinien, Vol

    A. Sommerfeld,Atombau und Spektrallinien, Vol. 1 (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1969)

  70. [70]

    Trestini, Phys

    D. Trestini, Phys. Rev. D109, 104003 (2024), arXiv:2401.06844 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    Wolfram MathWorld, Iverson Bracket,

    “Wolfram MathWorld, Iverson Bracket,”https://mathworld.wolfram.com/IversonBracket.html

  72. [72]

    K. E. Iverson,A Programming Language(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1962)

  73. [73]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e A44, 263 (1986),Numdam:AIHPA 1986 44 3 263 0

  74. [74]

    V. I. Arnold,Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, 1989)

  75. [75]

    Celestial mechanics in Kerr spacetime

    W. Schmidt, Class. Quant. Grav.19, 2743 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0202090

  76. [76]

    Witzany, V

    V. Witzany, V. Skoup´ y, L. C. Stein, and S. Tanay, Phys. Rev. D111, 044032 (2025), arXiv:2411.09742 [gr-qc]. 57

  77. [77]

    Solving post-Newtonian accurate Kepler Equation

    Y. Boetzel, A. Susobhanan, A. Gopakumar, A. Klein, and P. Jetzer, Phys. Rev. D96, 044011 (2017), arXiv:1707.02088 [gr-qc]

  78. [78]

    Hereditary Effects in Eccentric Compact Binary Inspirals to Third Post-Newtonian Order

    N. Loutrel and N. Yunes, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 044003 (2017), arXiv:1607.05409 [gr-qc]

  79. [79]

    I. M. Gradshteyn, , and I. S. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 8th ed., edited by D. Zwillinger and V. Moll (Academic Press, 2014)

  80. [80]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and M. S. S. Qusailah, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 3771 (2004), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 22, 3115 (2005)], arXiv:gr-qc/0404085

Showing first 80 references.