Generalizing quantum dimensions: Symmetry-based classification of local pseudo-Hermitian systems and the corresponding domain walls
Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 22:47 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
SymTFT algebraic structures yield a generalization of quantum dimensions that classifies renormalization group flows in pseudo-Hermitian systems.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
By studying the algebraic structure of the SymTFTs in detail, we found a natural generalization of the quantum dimensions associated with (pseudo-)Hermitian systems and (non)-unitary CFTs. These generalized data of SymTFTs provide classifications of massless and massive renormalization group flows, which will describe the quantum phase transitions of the corresponding pseudo-Hermitian systems. Moreover, our discussions straightforwardly enable one to relate a general class of coset constructions or level-rank dualities to domain wall problems between topological quantum field theories (or a series of corresponding quantum phase transitions related to the Higgs mechanism). Our work provides a
What carries the argument
The algebraic structure of symmetry topological field theories (SymTFTs) that produces generalized quantum dimensions for classifying RG flows and domain walls.
If this is right
- Classifications of massless and massive renormalization group flows become available for quantum phase transitions in pseudo-Hermitian systems.
- Coset constructions and level-rank dualities relate directly to domain wall problems between topological quantum field theories.
- Systematic reduction and classification of algebraic data and symmetries for pseudo-Hermitian systems follows from linear algebra and ring theory.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same generalized dimensions could be tested on other non-unitary or non-Hermitian models to see whether the classification pattern persists.
- Experimental signatures of the predicted domain walls might appear in lattice realizations of pseudo-Hermitian chains.
- The link to the Higgs mechanism suggests the framework could organize symmetry-breaking patterns in a broader set of topological phases.
Load-bearing premise
The abstract algebraic formalism of SymTFTs directly extends to pseudo-Hermitian systems and yields physically meaningful generalized quantum dimensions without requiring additional physical input or verification of the resulting classifications.
What would settle it
An explicit calculation of the generalized quantum dimensions for a concrete pseudo-Hermitian CFT model whose predicted massless or massive flows contradict the observed quantum phase transitions would falsify the central claim.
Figures
read the original abstract
We study conformal field theories (CFTs) and their classifications from a modern perspective based on the abstract algebraic formalism of symmetries or conserved charges, known as symmetry topological field theories (SymTFTs). By studying the algebraic structure of the SymTFTs in detail, we found a natural generalization of the quantum dimensions associated with (pseudo-)Hermitian systems and (non)-unitary CFTs. These generalized data of SymTFTs provide classifications of massless and massive renormalization group flows, which will describe the quantum phase transitions of the corresponding pseudo-Hermitian systems. Moreover, our discussions straightforwardly enable one to relate a general class of coset constructions or level-rank dualities to domain wall problems between topological quantum field theories (or a series of corresponding quantum phase transitions related to the Higgs mechanism). Our work provides a systematic reduction and classification of algebraic data, symmetries, for pseudo-Hermitian systems based on ideas from established mathematical fields, linear algebra and ring theory.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript proposes a generalization of quantum dimensions derived from the algebraic structure of symmetry topological field theories (SymTFTs) to classify local pseudo-Hermitian systems. It claims that these generalized data classify massless and massive renormalization group flows describing quantum phase transitions in such systems, and relates coset constructions and level-rank dualities to domain walls between topological quantum field theories via the Higgs mechanism.
Significance. If the central claims hold with explicit verification, the work would extend SymTFT methods to non-unitary and pseudo-Hermitian settings, offering an algebraic classification of symmetries and RG flows grounded in linear algebra and ring theory. This could be significant for understanding phase transitions in PT-symmetric or open quantum systems, provided the generalized dimensions yield falsifiable predictions beyond formal redefinitions.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract and § on generalized quantum dimensions] The load-bearing assumption that SymTFT fusion rules and generalized quantum dimensions directly encode the pseudo-Hermitian condition (real spectra despite non-Hermitian Hamiltonians) and classify physical RG flows without extra input such as PT-symmetry constraints needs explicit demonstration. The abstract presents this as a natural extension, but without concrete mappings to non-unitary spectra or observables (e.g., in §3 or the section deriving the generalized dimensions), the classifications risk being algebraic reductions rather than descriptions of quantum phase transitions.
- [Sections on RG flow classification and domain walls] The claimed classification of massless and massive flows (and the relation of coset constructions to domain walls) should be checked against known examples. For instance, does the generalized data reproduce the expected flows in the Lee-Yang CFT or other minimal non-unitary models, and is there an explicit equation showing how the new dimensions reduce to standard quantum dimensions in the unitary Hermitian limit?
minor comments (2)
- [Notation and definitions] Clarify notation for the generalized quantum dimensions to avoid confusion with standard ones; include a table comparing the two in a unitary vs. pseudo-Hermitian case.
- [Introduction] Add more references to prior work on SymTFT applications to non-unitary CFTs and pseudo-Hermitian systems to better situate the novelty.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the explicit connections to physical observables and known models.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract and § on generalized quantum dimensions] The load-bearing assumption that SymTFT fusion rules and generalized quantum dimensions directly encode the pseudo-Hermitian condition (real spectra despite non-Hermitian Hamiltonians) and classify physical RG flows without extra input such as PT-symmetry constraints needs explicit demonstration. The abstract presents this as a natural extension, but without concrete mappings to non-unitary spectra or observables (e.g., in §3 or the section deriving the generalized dimensions), the classifications risk being algebraic reductions rather than descriptions of quantum phase transitions.
Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the physical interpretation. The SymTFT fusion rules are chosen precisely so that the associated transfer-matrix eigenvalues remain real, which encodes the pseudo-Hermitian condition at the algebraic level; no additional PT constraint is imposed beyond the ring structure. To make this transparent, we have added a new subsection (now §3.2) that maps the generalized dimensions to the spectrum of a concrete PT-symmetric Ising chain, showing that the reality of the spectrum follows directly from the fusion rules without further input. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Sections on RG flow classification and domain walls] The claimed classification of massless and massive flows (and the relation of coset constructions to domain walls) should be checked against known examples. For instance, does the generalized data reproduce the expected flows in the Lee-Yang CFT or other minimal non-unitary models, and is there an explicit equation showing how the new dimensions reduce to standard quantum dimensions in the unitary Hermitian limit?
Authors: We appreciate the request for concrete checks. The manuscript already outlines the general classification, but we now include an explicit computation for the Lee-Yang minimal model (new §4.3) that reproduces the known massless-to-massive RG flow using the generalized dimensions. We have also inserted an equation (Eq. (2.15)) in the section deriving the generalized dimensions that shows the reduction: when the fusion ring becomes that of a unitary modular tensor category, the generalized dimensions reduce to the ordinary positive quantum dimensions and the pseudo-Hermitian condition becomes ordinary unitarity. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: generalization derived from independent algebraic study of SymTFTs
full rationale
The paper derives its generalization of quantum dimensions by applying established ideas from linear algebra and ring theory to the algebraic structure of SymTFTs, then uses the resulting data to classify RG flows in pseudo-Hermitian systems. This chain is presented as a systematic reduction from the SymTFT formalism rather than a redefinition or fit of the target classifications themselves. No load-bearing self-citation, ansatz smuggling, or uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work is indicated in the provided text; the central claims remain self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption SymTFTs encode the symmetries of CFTs and pseudo-Hermitian systems via their algebraic structure.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We found a natural generalization of the quantum dimensions... These generalized data of SymTFTs provide classifications of massless and massive renormalization group flows
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Characterizing bulk properties of gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Role of duality in unusual ordering
Gapped phases dual to massless RG flows exhibit unusual structures outside standard boundary CFT modules and typically break non-group-like symmetries, characterized via smeared boundary CFTs with an example in the tr...
-
Defects in N=1 minimal models and RG flows
Topological defects constrain the allowed RG flows of N=1 superconformal minimal models, first via a bosonic coset description and then for the full superconformal case.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Comment on noncommutative fusion ring and magma In this section, we comment on the noncommutative fusion ring and magma, outside of the scope of the main text. For a noncommutative fusion ring, there can ex- ist matrix representations, but the underlying operations can be intertwining operations. This intertwining oper- ation comes from degeneracies of th...
-
[2]
Phenomenology on entanglement cut: Naturality of complex spectrum In the main texts, we studied two types of boundary phenomena: smearedBCFTappearinginagappedphase or BCFT appearing in physical boundaries. In this sub- section, we discuss some phenomenology on the entan- glement surface[81, 276, 277]. First thing to note is that the entanglement spec- tru...
- [3]
-
[4]
N. Okuma and M. Sato,Non-Hermitian Topological Phenomena: A Review,Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14(2023) 83–107, arXiv:2205.10379 [cond-mat.mes-hall]
-
[5]
D. Manzano,A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation,AIP Adv.10(2020) 025106, arXiv:1906.04478 [quant-ph]
-
[6]
C. M. Bender,Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians,Rept. Prog. Phys.70(2007) 947, arXiv:hep-th/0703096
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
-
[7]
P. Dorey, C. Dunning, and R. Tateo,The ODE/IM Correspondence,J. Phys. A40(2007) R205, arXiv:hep-th/0703066
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
-
[8]
A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP 10(2001) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0106113
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[9]
Some Aspects of the de Sitter/CFT Correspondence
D. Klemm,Some aspects of the de Sitter / CFT correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B625(2002) 295–311, arXiv:hep-th/0106247
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
-
[10]
T. Kawamoto, R. Maeda, N. Nakamura, and T. Takayanagi,Traversable AdS wormhole via non-local double trace or Janus deformation,JHEP04 (2025) 086, arXiv:2502.03531 [hep-th]
-
[11]
Nakanishi,Nonunitary Minimal Models and Rsos Models,Nucl
T. Nakanishi,Nonunitary Minimal Models and Rsos Models,Nucl. Phys. B334(1990) 745–766
work page 1990
-
[12]
A. N. Schellekens and S. Yankielowicz,Field Identification Fixed Points in the Coset Construction, Nucl. Phys. B334(1990) 67–102
work page 1990
-
[13]
Field Identification in Non-Unitary Diagonal Cosets
P. Mathieu, D. Senechal, and M. Walton,Field identification in nonunitary diagonal cosets,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7S1B(1992) 731–764, arXiv:hep-th/9110003
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992
-
[14]
V. Pasquier and H. Saleur,Common Structures Between Finite Systems and Conformal Field Theories Through Quantum Groups,Nucl. Phys. B330(1990) 523–556
work page 1990
-
[15]
N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson,Localization transitions in non-hermitian quantum mechanics,Physical Review Letters77(July, 1996) 570–573
work page 1996
-
[16]
A. Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry. The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum,J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 205–214, arXiv:math-ph/0107001
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
-
[17]
A. Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry 2. A Complete characterization of nonHermitian Hamiltonians with a real spectrum,J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 2814–2816, arXiv:math-ph/0110016
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
-
[18]
A. Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry 3: Equivalence of pseudoHermiticity and the presence of antilinear symmetries,J. Math. Phys.43 (2002) 3944–3951, arXiv:math-ph/0203005
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
-
[19]
C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher,Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 5243–5246, arXiv:physics/9712001
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
-
[20]
A. B. Zamolodchikov,Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,JETP Lett.43(1986) 730–732
work page 1986
-
[21]
O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, and F. Ravanini, Irreversibility of the renormalization group flow in non-unitary quantum field theory,J. Phys. A50 (2017) 424002, arXiv:1706.01871 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[22]
F. M. Fernández,Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and 17 similarity transformations, arXiv:1502.02694 [quant-ph]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[23]
Y. Fukusumi and T. Kawamoto,Generalizing fusion rules by shuffle: Symmetry-based classifications of nonlocal systems constructed from similarity transformations,arXiv:2512.02139 [hep-th]
-
[24]
Relating c<0 and c>0 Conformal Field Theories
S. Guruswamy and A. W. W. Ludwig,Relating c<0 and c>0 conformal field theories,Nucl. Phys. B519 (1998) 661–681, arXiv:hep-th/9612172
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
-
[25]
Semi-Lorentz invariance, unitarity, and critical exponents of symplectic fermion models
A. LeClair and M. Neubert,Semi-Lorentz invariance, unitarity, and critical exponents of symplectic fermion models,JHEP10(2007) 027, arXiv:0705.4657 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
-
[26]
C.-T. Hsieh and P.-Y. Chang,Relating non-Hermitian and Hermitian quantum systems at criticality,SciPost Phys. Core6(2023) 062, arXiv:2211.12525 [cond-mat.str-el]
-
[27]
A. Kuniba and T. Nakanishi,LEVEL RANK DUALITY IN FUSION RSOS MODELS,in International Colloquium on Modern Quantum Field Theory. 1, 1990
work page 1990
-
[28]
T. Nakanishi and A. Tsuchiya,Level rank duality of WZW models in conformal field theory,Commun. Math. Phys.144(1992) 351–372
work page 1992
-
[29]
D. Altschuler, M. Bauer, and H. Saleur,Level rank duality in nonunitary coset theories,J. Phys. A23 (1990) L789–L794
work page 1990
-
[30]
Nonunitary Lagrangians and unitary non-Lagrangian conformal field theories
M. Buican and Z. Laczko,Nonunitary Lagrangians and unitary non-Lagrangian conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 081601, arXiv:1711.09949 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
- [31]
-
[32]
T. Creutzig, N. Garner, and H. Kim,Mirror Symmetry and Level-rank Duality for 3dN= 4Rank 0 SCFTs, arXiv:2406.00138 [hep-th]
-
[33]
3d-3d Correspondence Revisited
H.-J. Chung, T. Dimofte, S. Gukov, and P. Sułkowski, 3d-3d Correspondence Revisited,JHEP04(2016) 140, arXiv:1405.3663 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
- [34]
-
[35]
The Bond-Algebraic Approach to Dualities
E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov,The Bond-Algebraic Approach to Dualities,Adv. Phys.60 (2011) 679–798, arXiv:1103.2776 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[36]
Holographic Symmetries and Generalized Order Parameters for Topological Matter
E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov,Holographic symmetries and generalized order parameters for topological matter,Phys. Rev. B87(2013) 041105, arXiv:1211.0564 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[37]
D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP02(2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[38]
Defects and Bulk Perturbations of Boundary Landau-Ginzburg Orbifolds
I. Brunner and D. Roggenkamp,Defects and bulk perturbations of boundary Landau-Ginzburg orbifolds, JHEP04(2008) 001, arXiv:0712.0188 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
-
[39]
Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows
D. Gaiotto,Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows,JHEP12(2012) 103, arXiv:1201.0767 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
- [40]
-
[41]
V. B. Petkova and J. B. Zuber,Generalized Twisted Partition Functions,Phys. Lett. B504(2001) 157–164, arXiv:hep-th/0011021
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[42]
A. Ocneanu,Paths on coxeter diagrams: From platonic solids and singularities to minimal models and subfactors,Lectures on Operator Theory(01, 2000)
work page 2000
-
[43]
Modular Invariants, Graphs and $\alpha$-Induction for Nets of Subfactors. III
J. Bockenhauer and D. E. Evans,Modular invariants, graphs and alpha induction for nets of subfactors. 3., Commun. Math. Phys.205(1999) 183–228, arXiv:hep-th/9812110
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
-
[44]
On $\alpha$-induction, chiral generators and modular invariants for subfactors
J. Bockenhauer and D. E. Evans,On alpha induction, chiral generators and modular invariants for subfactors,Commun. Math. Phys.208(1999) 429–487, arXiv:math/9904109
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
-
[45]
Chiral structure of modular invariants for subfactors
J. Bockenhauer, D. E. Evans, and Y. Kawahigashi, Chiral structure of modular invariants for subfactors, Commun. Math. Phys.210(2000) 733–784, arXiv:math/9907149
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
-
[46]
Fusion category sym- metry i: Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases,
R. Thorngren and Y. Wang,Fusion Category Symmetry I: Anomaly In-Flow and Gapped Phases, arXiv:1912.02817 [hep-th]
-
[47]
Fusion category sym- metry ii: Categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond,
R. Thorngren and Y. Wang,Fusion category symmetry. Part II. Categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond,JHEP07(2024) 051, arXiv:2106.12577 [hep-th]
-
[48]
In this sense, a part of category theories appearing in physics is less abstract and less general than linear algebra
- [49]
-
[50]
Y. Fukusumi and Y. Furuta,Homomorphism, substructure and ideal: Elementary but rigorous aspects of renormalization group or hierarchical structure of topological orders, arXiv:2506.23155 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[51]
Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun
E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun. Math. Phys.121(1989) 351–399
work page 1989
-
[52]
We thank Yuji Tachikawa and Jurgen Fuchs for the related discussions and many useful comments
-
[53]
Integrable quantum field theory with boundaries: the exact g-function
P. Dorey, D. Fioravanti, C. Rim, and R. Tateo, Integrable quantum field theory with boundaries: The Exact g function,Nucl. Phys. B696(2004) 445–467, arXiv:hep-th/0404014
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
-
[54]
Reflection factors and exact g-functions for purely elastic scattering theories
P. Dorey, A. Lishman, C. Rim, and R. Tateo, Reflection factors and exact g-functions for purely elastic scattering theories,Nucl. Phys. B744(2006) 239–276, arXiv:hep-th/0512337
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[55]
Bulk flows in Virasoro minimal models with boundaries
S. Fredenhagen, M. R. Gaberdiel, and C. Schmidt-Colinet,Bulk flows in Virasoro minimal models with boundaries,J. Phys. A42(2009) 495403, arXiv:0907.2560 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
-
[56]
Exact g-function flow between conformal field theories
P. Dorey, C. Rim, and R. Tateo,Exact g-function flow between conformal field theories,Nucl. Phys. B834 (2010) 485–501, arXiv:0911.4969 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[57]
F. Ambrosino, I. Runkel, and G. M. T. Watts, Non-local charges from perturbed defects via SymTFT in 2d CFT,J. Phys. A58(2025) 425401, arXiv:2504.05277 [hep-th]
-
[58]
F. Ambrosino, I. Runkel, and G. M. T. Watts, Translation invariant defects as an extension of topological symmetries,11, 2025. 18 arXiv:2511.02007 [hep-th]
-
[59]
A. B. Zamolodchikov,Integrable field theory from conformal field theory,Adv. Stud. Pure Math.19 (1989) 641–674
work page 1989
-
[60]
Fermion Condensation and Gapped Domain Walls in Topological Orders
Y. Wan and C. Wang,Fermion Condensation and Gapped Domain Walls in Topological Orders,JHEP 03(2017) 172, arXiv:1607.01388 [cond-mat.str-el]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[61]
F. Klos and D. Roggenkamp,Realizing IR theories by projections in the UV,JHEP01(2020) 097, arXiv:1907.12339 [hep-th]
-
[62]
F. Klos,Embedding topological quantum field theories functorially in the UV.PhD thesis, Heidelberg U., 2021
work page 2021
-
[63]
Bulk Renormalization Group Flows and Boundary States in Conformal Field Theories
J. Cardy,Bulk Renormalization Group Flows and Boundary States in Conformal Field Theories,SciPost Phys.3(2017) 011, arXiv:1706.01568 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[64]
Chiral entanglement in massive quantum field theories in 1+1 dimensions
M. Lencses, J. Viti, and G. Takacs,Chiral entanglement in massive quantum field theories in 1+1 dimensions,JHEP01(2019) 177, arXiv:1811.06500 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
- [65]
-
[66]
Kikuchi,Symmetry enhancement in RCFT, arXiv:2109.02672 [hep-th]
K. Kikuchi,Symmetry enhancement in RCFT, arXiv:2109.02672 [hep-th]
-
[67]
Kikuchi,Symmetry enhancement in RCFT II, arXiv:2207.06433 [hep-th]
K. Kikuchi,Symmetry enhancement in RCFT II, arXiv:2207.06433 [hep-th]
- [68]
- [69]
-
[70]
X. Wen,Space of conformal boundary conditions from the view of higher Berry phase: Flow of Berry curvature in parametrized BCFTs, arXiv:2507.12546 [hep-th]
-
[71]
E. Date, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and M. Okado, Automorphic properties of local height probabilities for integrable solid-on-solid models,Phys. Rev. B35 (1987) 2105–2107
work page 1987
-
[72]
H. Saleur and M. Bauer,On Some Relations Between Local Height Probabilities and Conformal Invariance, Nucl. Phys. B320(1989) 591–624
work page 1989
-
[73]
Off-critical local height probabilities on a plane and critical partition functions on a cylinder
O. Foda,Off-critical local height probabilities on a plane and critical partition functions on a cylinder, arXiv:1711.03337 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[74]
Time-dependence of correlation functions following a quantum quench
P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy,Time-dependence of correlation functions following a quantum quench, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 136801, arXiv:cond-mat/0601225
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[75]
X.-L. Qi, H. Katsura, and A. W. W. Ludwig,General relationship between the entanglement spectrum and the edge state spectrum of topological quantum states, Physical Review Letters108(May, 2012)
work page 2012
-
[76]
Universal features of left-right entanglement entropy
D. Das and S. Datta,Universal features of left-right entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 131602, arXiv:1504.02475 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[77]
G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.123 (1989) 177
work page 1989
-
[78]
G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Naturality in Conformal Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B313(1989) 16–40
work page 1989
-
[79]
G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Lectures on RCFT,in Strings ’89, Proceedings of the Trieste Spring School on Superstrings.World Scientific, 1990.http://www. physics.rutgers.edu/~gmoore/LecturesRCFT.pdf
work page 1990
- [80]
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.