pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.18681 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Tracing the Trace Anomaly of Dense Matter inside Neutron Stars

Shiyue Ren , Lap-Ming Lin
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 06:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qcnucl-th
keywords neutron starstrace anomalyquasi-universal relationsequation of statetidal deformabilitycompactnesspulsarsdense matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasi-universal relations connect the trace anomaly profile of neutron stars to their compactness, moment of inertia, and tidal deformability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that the radial profile of the trace anomaly, which quantifies broken conformal symmetry in dense matter, can be linked to global properties of neutron stars through quasi-universal relations. These relations are constructed from various equations of state and then used to infer the trace anomaly inside real neutron stars from current observations of pulsars and gravitational wave data. If these relations are reliable, they offer a practical way to map how conformal symmetry is broken at the extreme densities found in neutron star cores. The work provides a specific estimate for the central trace anomaly in a typical 1.4 solar mass neutron star based on tidal deformability constraints.

Core claim

The authors present quasi-universal relations that connect the stellar profile of the trace anomaly Δ to the compactness, moment of inertia, and tidal deformability of neutron stars. Applying these relations to mass-radius measurements of PSR J0030+0451 and PSR J0740+6620, moment of inertia for PSR J0737-3039A, and a multimessenger constraint on tidal deformability yields an estimate of Δ_c = 0.1770 with uncertainties at the center of a 1.4 solar mass neutron star.

What carries the argument

Quasi-universal relations that link the trace anomaly Δ profile throughout the star to its compactness, moment of inertia, and tidal deformability.

If this is right

  • The trace anomaly profile can be determined for observed neutron stars like PSR J0030+0451 using their mass and radius data.
  • The central trace anomaly for a canonical 1.4 solar mass neutron star is estimated as 0.1770 with lower and upper bounds of 0.0432 and 0.0365 respectively.
  • More precise future observations from electromagnetic and gravitational-wave sources will tighten constraints on the trace anomaly behavior inside neutron stars.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These relations may allow indirect probes of the phase structure of quantum chromodynamics at high densities by revealing the extent of conformal symmetry breaking.
  • Applying the same approach to upcoming radius measurements could provide cross-checks on the trace anomaly estimates from different observables.
  • Systematic application across a range of neutron star masses could reveal how the trace anomaly evolves with density in a model-independent way.

Load-bearing premise

The relations remain valid for the true equation of state of neutron star matter even though they were derived from a finite selection of model equations of state.

What would settle it

Discovery of a neutron star whose measured properties lead to a trace anomaly profile that deviates significantly from the prediction of these quasi-universal relations for its compactness and tidal deformability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.18681 by Lap-Ming Lin, Shiyue Ren.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Mass-radius relations of the EOS models employed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: First row [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The trace anomaly profile predicted by Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The central trace anomaly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The trace anomaly $\Delta$ is an important quantity that measures the broken conformal symmetry in neutron star matter. In this work, we present quasi-universal relations that connect the stellar profile of $\Delta$ to the compactness, moment of inertia, and tidal deformability of neutron stars. We apply the quasi-universal relations to determine the trace anomaly profiles for PSR J0030+0451 and PSR J0740+6620 based on their mass-radius measurements. We also analyze PSR J0737-3039A according to its moment of inertia inferred from Bayesian modeling of nuclear equation of state. A recent multimessenger constraint on the tidal deformability is also studied, resulting in an estimate value of the trace anomaly $\Delta_c = 0.1770^{+0.0365}_{-0.0432}$ at the center of a $1.4M_\odot$ canonical neutron star. It is expected that more precise observations from both electromagnetic and gravitational-wave channels in the future will provide tighter constraints on the behavior of $\Delta$ inside neutron stars.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents quasi-universal relations that connect the radial profile of the trace anomaly Δ in neutron star interiors to global stellar properties including compactness, moment of inertia, and tidal deformability. These relations are derived from an ensemble of equations of state and subsequently applied to observational constraints from pulsars PSR J0030+0451, PSR J0740+6620, and PSR J0737-3039A, as well as multimessenger tidal deformability data, to infer Δ profiles and a central value for a canonical 1.4 solar mass neutron star.

Significance. If the quasi-universal relations are robust, the work provides a valuable tool for translating astrophysical observations into constraints on the trace anomaly, offering insights into the degree of conformal symmetry breaking in supranuclear matter. This could complement traditional EOS inference methods and highlight the potential of using existing and future data from electromagnetic and gravitational wave observations to probe dense matter properties.

major comments (3)
  1. [Derivation of quasi-universal relations] The relations are obtained by fitting or averaging over a finite collection of EOS models. The manuscript must explicitly list the EOS models employed, detail the fitting procedure (e.g., functional form and regression method), and provide validation tests such as leave-one-out cross-validation or application to EOS with first-order phase transitions to confirm the claimed quasi-universality holds beyond the sample.
  2. [Application to observational data] When applying the relations to data from PSR J0030+0451 and PSR J0740+6620, the analysis should address potential circularity arising from the fact that the relations were calibrated on similar EOS families; include a discussion or quantitative estimate of systematic uncertainties due to the choice of EOS ensemble.
  3. [Uncertainties in Δ_c estimate] The reported value Δ_c = 0.1770^{+0.0365}_{-0.0432} for the 1.4 M⊙ star appears to propagate only observational uncertainties. The total error budget should incorporate the intrinsic scatter or systematic error from the quasi-universal approximation itself, as quantified by the dispersion in the underlying EOS sample.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Ensure that the definition of the trace anomaly Δ and its radial profile are clearly stated early in the manuscript, including any normalization or dimensionless form used.
  2. [Figure clarity] Figures showing the Δ profiles for the observed stars should include error bands that reflect both observational and relation uncertainties for better interpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each of the major comments below and have made revisions to the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of quasi-universal relations] The relations are obtained by fitting or averaging over a finite collection of EOS models. The manuscript must explicitly list the EOS models employed, detail the fitting procedure (e.g., functional form and regression method), and provide validation tests such as leave-one-out cross-validation or application to EOS with first-order phase transitions to confirm the claimed quasi-universality holds beyond the sample.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the EOS ensemble, fitting details, and validation is essential for reproducibility. The original manuscript summarized the ensemble but did not include the complete list or procedural specifics. In the revised manuscript we have added an appendix that enumerates every EOS model in the sample, specifies the functional forms employed for the fits (polynomial and power-law regressions), and describes the least-squares regression procedure. We have also added leave-one-out cross-validation results together with explicit tests on EOS models that incorporate first-order phase transitions; these confirm that the quasi-universal relations retain comparable accuracy outside the original calibration set. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Application to observational data] When applying the relations to data from PSR J0030+0451 and PSR J0740+6620, the analysis should address potential circularity arising from the fact that the relations were calibrated on similar EOS families; include a discussion or quantitative estimate of systematic uncertainties due to the choice of EOS ensemble.

    Authors: We acknowledge the risk of circularity when the calibration and application samples share similar EOS families. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that quantifies this systematic uncertainty. We report the variation in inferred Δ profiles obtained when the relations are recalibrated on random subsets of the ensemble and when they are applied to independent EOS models withheld from the original fit. These differences are presented as an explicit systematic error component that is now combined with the observational uncertainties. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Uncertainties in Δ_c estimate] The reported value Δ_c = 0.1770^{+0.0365}_{-0.0432} for the 1.4 M⊙ star appears to propagate only observational uncertainties. The total error budget should incorporate the intrinsic scatter or systematic error from the quasi-universal approximation itself, as quantified by the dispersion in the underlying EOS sample.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. The quoted uncertainties were derived solely from the observational constraints. In the revised manuscript we have augmented the error budget with the intrinsic scatter of the quasi-universal relations, defined as the standard deviation of the predicted central Δ values across the full EOS ensemble at fixed compactness. The updated Δ_c value and its asymmetric uncertainties now reflect the quadrature sum of observational and systematic contributions; the abstract and the relevant results section have been revised accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; relations derived from EOS sample and applied to external observations

full rationale

The paper computes the trace anomaly profile Δ(r) for a collection of equations of state, identifies empirical correlations between the profile and global stellar quantities (compactness, moment of inertia, tidal deformability), and then uses those correlations to infer Δ for observed pulsars whose mass-radius or tidal data come from NICER and gravitational-wave measurements. This workflow does not reduce any claimed prediction to its own fitted inputs by construction: the relations are extracted once from the model ensemble and subsequently applied to independent observational constraints. No self-definitional loop, load-bearing self-citation chain, or renaming of a known result is required for the central claim. The representativeness of the EOS sample affects external validity but does not create an internal circularity in the derivation itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of quasi-universal behavior across a representative sample of nuclear equations of state and on the assumption that observational inferences (mass-radius, moment of inertia, tidal deformability) can be mapped directly onto the trace-anomaly profile without additional model-dependent corrections.

free parameters (1)
  • EOS ensemble used to establish quasi-universality
    The relations are calibrated on a finite set of equations of state whose selection and weighting constitute free choices that affect the fitted profiles.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quasi-universal relations for the trace anomaly hold to sufficient accuracy across the relevant range of neutron-star masses and equations of state
    Invoked when the authors present the relations and apply them to observed stars without additional model-specific adjustments.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5486 in / 1420 out tokens · 31888 ms · 2026-05-17T06:17:41.463197+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky,Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Objects(Wiley, New York, 2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, Neutron star observa- tions: Prognosis for equation of state constraints, Physics Reports442, 109 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    P. B. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S. M. Ransom, M. S. E. Roberts, and J. W. T. Hessels, A two-solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay, Nature467, 1081 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

    J. Antoniadis, P. C. C. Freire, N. Wex, T. M. Tauris, R. S. Lynch, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Kramer, C. Bassa, V. S. Dhillon, T. Driebe, J. W. T. Hessels, V. M. Kaspi, V. I. Kondratiev, N. Langer, T. R. Marsh, M. A. McLaugh- lin, T. T. Pennucci, S. M. Ransom, I. H. Stairs, J. van Leeuwen, J. P. W. Verbiest, and D. G. Whelan, A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Rel...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bog- danov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, R. M. Ludlam, S. Mahmoodifar, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, T. E. Strohmayer, K. S. Wood, T. Enoto, R. Foster, T. Oka- jima, G. Prigozhin, and Y. Soong, PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications...

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, P. S. Ray, R. M. Ludlam, S. Guillot, Z. Arzoumanian, C. L. Baker, A. V. Bilous, D. Chakrabarty, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, S. M. Morsink, and T. E. Strohmayer, A nicer view of PSR J0030+0451: Millisec- ond pulsar parameter estimation, Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L21 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, M. T. Wolff, C. L. Baker, T. Cazeau, S. Man- thripragada, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, S. Pollard, I. Cognard, H. T. Cromartie, E. Fonseca, L. Guillemot, M. Kerr, A. Parthasarathy, T. T. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray, S. Bogdanov, S. Guillot, S. M. Morsink, A. V. Bilous, Z. Arzouma- nian, D. Choudhury, J. S. Deneva, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, R. M. Ludlam, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, C. Prescod- Weinstein, R. A. Remillard, M. T. Wolff, E. Fonseca, H. T. Cromartie, M. Kerr, T. T. Penn...

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Bedaque and A

    P. Bedaque and A. W. Steiner, Sound Velocity Bound and Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 031103 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    McLerran and S

    L. McLerran and S. Reddy, Quarkyonic matter and neu- tron stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 122701 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Altiparmak, C

    S. Altiparmak, C. Ecker, and L. Rezzolla, On the Sound Speed in Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J. Lett.939, L34 (2022), arXiv:2203.14974 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, J. Hirvonen, O. Komoltsev, A. Kurkela, J. Nättilä, and A. Vuorinen, Strongly in- teracting matter exhibits deconfined behavior in massive neutron stars, Nature Communications14, 8451 (2023), arXiv:2303.11356 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, L. D. McLerran, and M. Praszałowicz, Trace Anomaly as Signature of Con- formality in Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 252702 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Marczenko, L

    M. Marczenko, L. McLerran, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Reaching percolation and conformal limits in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C107, 025802 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    J. C. Jiménez, L. Lazzari, and V. P. Gonçalves, How the qcd trace anomaly behaves at the core of twin stars?, Phys. Rev. D110, 114014 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Cai and B.-A

    B.-J. Cai and B.-A. Li, Unraveling trace anomaly of supradense matter via neutron star compactness scaling, Phys. Rev. D112, 10.1103/3p2p-p3d4 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/3p2p-p3d4 2025

  17. [17]

    Cottam, F

    J. Cottam, F. Paerels, and M. Mendez, Gravitationally redshifted absorption lines in the X-ray burst spectra of a neutron star, Nature420, 51 (2002)

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Kramer and N

    M. Kramer and N. Wex, The double pulsar system: A unique laboratory for gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity26, 073001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    J. M. Lattimer and B. F. Schutz, Constraining the Equa- tion of State with Moment of Inertia Measurements, As- trophys. J.629, 979 (2005)

    work page 2005

  20. [20]

    H. Hu, M. Kramer, N. Wex, D. J. Champion, and M. S. Kehl, Constraining the dense matter equation-of-state with radio pulsars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.497, 3118 (2020), arXiv:2007.07725 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    É. É. Flanagan, Constraining neutron-star tidal Love numbers with gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 77, 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.021502 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.021502 2008

  22. [22]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Chatziioannou, Neutron-star tidal deformability and equation-of-state constraints, General Relativity and Gravitation52, 109 (2020), arXiv:2006.03168 [gr-qc]

    K. Chatziioannou, Neutron-star tidal deformability and equation-of-state constraints, General Relativity and Gravitation52, 109 (2020), arXiv:2006.03168 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, I-Love-Q relations in neutron stars and their applications to astrophysics, gravitational waves, and fundamental physics, Phys. Rev. D88, 023009 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Jiang and K

    N. Jiang and K. Yagi, Analytic i-love-c relations for real- istic neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D101, 124006 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    R. C. Tolman, Static Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equa- tions for Spheres of Fluid, Physical Review55, 364 (1939)

    work page 1939

  27. [27]

    J. B. Hartle, Slowly Rotating Relativistic Stars. I. Equa- tions of Structure, Astrophys. J.150, 1005 (1967)

    work page 1967

  28. [28]

    Hinderer, Tidal Love Numbers of Neutron Stars, As- trophys

    T. Hinderer, Tidal Love Numbers of Neutron Stars, As- trophys. J.677, 1216 (2008)

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    CompOSE - CompStar Online Supernovae Equations of State

    S. Typel, M. Oertel, and T. Klaehn, CompOSE - Comp- Star Online Supernovae Equations of State (2013), arXiv:1307.5715 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Bennour, P.-H

    L. Bennour, P.-H. Heenen, P. Bonche, J. Dobaczewski, and H. Flocard, Charge distributions of208Pb, 206Pb, and 205Tl and the mean-field approximation, Phys. Rev. C 40, 2834 (1989). 12

    work page 1989

  31. [31]

    Gulminelli and A

    F. Gulminelli and A. R. Raduta, Unified treatment of sub- saturation stellar matter at zero and finite temperature, Phys. Rev. C92, 055803 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Dexheimer and S

    V. Dexheimer and S. Schramm, Proto-neutron and neu- tron stars in a chiral SU(3) model, Astrophys. J.683, 943 (2008)

    work page 2008

  33. [33]

    Dexheimer, Tabulated neutron star equations of state modelled within the chiral mean field model, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia34, e066 (2017)

    V. Dexheimer, Tabulated neutron star equations of state modelled within the chiral mean field model, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia34, e066 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    V. A. Dexheimer and S. Schramm, Novel approach to modeling hybrid stars, Phys. Rev. C81, 045201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    Dexheimer, R

    V. Dexheimer, R. O. Gomes, T. Klähn, S. Han, and M. Salinas, GW190814 as a massive rapidly rotating neu- tron star with exotic degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. C 103, 025808 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Togashi, K

    H. Togashi, K. Nakazato, Y. Takehara, S. Yamamuro, H. Suzuki, and M. Takano, Nuclear equation of state for core-collapse supernova simulations with realistic nuclear forces, Nucl. Phys. A961, 78 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    T. Kojo, G. Baym, and T. Hatsuda, Implications of nicer for neutron star matter: The QHC21 equation of state, Astrophys. J.934, 46 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    G. Audi, F. G. Kondev, M. Wang, W. J. Huang, and S. Naimi, The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear prop- erties, Chinese Physics C41, 030001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Allard and N

    V. Allard and N. Chamel, 1S0 pairing gaps, chemical potentials and entrainment matrix in superfluid neutron- star cores for the brussels–montreal functionals, Universe 7, 10.3390/universe7120470 (2021)

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7120470 2021

  40. [40]

    J. M. Pearson and N. Chamel, Unified equations of state for cold nonaccreting neutron stars with brussels-montreal functionals. iii. inclusion of microscopic corrections to pasta phases, Phys. Rev. C105, 015803 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    J. M. Pearson, N. Chamel, and A. Y. Potekhin, Unified equations of state for cold nonaccreting neutron stars with brussels-montreal functionals. ii. pasta phases in semiclassical approximation, Phys. Rev. C101, 015802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    J. M. Pearson, N. Chamel, A. Y. Potekhin, A. F. Fantina, C. Ducoin, A. K. Dutta, and S. Goriely, Erratum: Unified equations of state for cold non-accreting neutron stars with brussels-montreal functionals. i. role of symmetry energy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.486, 768 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Goriely, N

    S. Goriely, N. Chamel, and J. M. Pearson, Hartree-fock- bogoliubov nuclear mass model with 0.50 MeV accuracy basedonstandardformsofskyrmeandpairingfunctionals, Phys. Rev. C88, 061302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Perot, N

    L. Perot, N. Chamel, and A. Sourie, Role of the symme- try energy and the neutron-matter stiffness on the tidal deformability of a neutron star with unified equations of state, Phys. Rev. C100, 035801 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Xu, Y., Goriely, S., Jorissen, A., Chen, G. L., and Arnould, M., Databases and tools for nuclear astrophysics applica- tions - BRUSsels Nuclear LIBrary (BRUSLIB), Nuclear Astrophysics Compilation of REactions II (NACRE II) and Nuclear NETwork GENerator (NETGEN), A&A549, A106 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Welker, N

    A. Welker, N. A. S. Althubiti, D. Atanasov, K. Blaum, T. E. Cocolios, F. Herfurth, S. Kreim, D. Lunney, V. Manea, M. Mougeot, D. Neidherr, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, M. Rosenbusch, L. Schweikhard, F. Wienholtz, R. N. Wolf, and K. Zuber, Binding energy of79Cu: Prob- ing the structure of the doubly magic78Ni from only one proton away, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 192502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Akmal, V

    A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall, Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure, Phys. Rev. C58, 1804 (1998)

    work page 1998

  48. [48]

    P. J. Davis, H. Dinh Thi, A. F. Fantina, F. Gulminelli, M. Oertel, and L. Suleiman, Inference of neutron-star properties with unified crust-core equations of state for pa- rameter estimation, Astron. Astrophys.687, A44 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Haensel, A

    Envelopes with Strong Magnetic Fields, inNeutron Stars 1, edited by P. Haensel, A. Y. Potekhin, and D. G. Yakovlev (Springer, New York, NY, 2007) pp. 167–205

    work page 2007

  50. [50]

    W. Long, J. Meng, N. V. Giai, and S.-G. Zhou, New effective interactions in relativistic mean field theory with nonlinear terms and density-dependent meson-nucleon coupling, Phys. Rev. C69, 034319 (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    C.-J. Xia, T. Maruyama, A. Li, B. Yuan Sun, W.-H. Long, and Y.-X. Zhang, Unified neutron star EOSs and neutron star structures in RMF models, Communications in Theoretical Physics74, 095303 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    J.-X.Niu, H.Sun, C.-J.Xia,andT.Maruyama,Properties and microscopic structures of dense stellar matter in RMF models (2025), arXiv:2506.11492 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    A. Li, A. L. Watts, G. Zhang, S. Guillot, Y. Xu, A. San- tangelo, S. Zane, H. Feng, S.-N. Zhang, M. Ge, L. Qi, T. Salmi, B. Dorsman, Z. Miao, Z. Tu, Y. Cavecchi, X. Zhou, X. Zheng, W. Wang, Q. Cheng, X. Liu, Y. Wei, W. Wang, Y. Xu, S. Weng, W. Zhu, Z. Li, L. Shao, Y. Tuo, A. Dohi, M. Lyu, P. Liu, J. Yuan, M. Wang, W. Zhang, Z. Li, L. Tao, L. Zhang, H. She...

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Y. Lim, J. W. Holt, and R. J. Stahulak, Predicting the moment of inertia of pulsar J0737-3039A from Bayesian modeling of the nuclear equation of state, Phys. Rev. C 100, 035802 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Kramer, I

    M. Kramer, I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, N. Wex, A. T. Deller, W. A. Coles, M. Ali, M. Burgay, F. Camilo, I. Cognard, T. Damour, G. Desvignes, R. D. Ferdman, P. C. C. Freire, S. Grondin, L. Guillemot, G. B. Hobbs, G. Janssen, R. Karuppusamy, D. R. Lorimer, A. G. Lyne, J. W. McKee, M. McLaughlin, L. E. Münch, B. B. P. Perera, N. Pol, A. Possenti, J. Sark...

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    H. O. Silva, A. M. Holgado, A. Cárdenas-Avendaño, and N. Yunes, Astrophysical and theoretical physics impli- cations from multimessenger neutron star observations, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 181101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Z. Miao, A. Li, and Z.-G. Dai, On the moment of inertia of PSR J0737-3039 A from LIGO/Virgo and NICER, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.515, 5071 (2022), arXiv:2107.07979 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equa- tion of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018). 13

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Lim and J

    Y. Lim and J. W. Holt, Neutron star tidal deformabilities constrained by nuclear theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 062701 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Essick, I

    R. Essick, I. Tews, P. Landry, S. Reddy, and D. E. Holz, Direct astrophysical tests of chiral effective field theory at supranuclear densities, Phys. Rev. C102, 055803 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    Legred, K

    I. Legred, K. Chatziioannou, R. Essick, S. Han, and P. Landry, Impact of the psrJ0740 + 6620radius con- straint on the properties of high-density matter, Phys. Rev. D104, 063003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Huang, Model-independent Determination of the Tidal Deformability of a 1.4 M ⊙ Neutron Star from Gravitational-wave Measurements, Astrophys

    C. Huang, Model-independent Determination of the Tidal Deformability of a 1.4 M ⊙ Neutron Star from Gravitational-wave Measurements, Astrophys. J.985, 216 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Choudhury, T

    D. Choudhury, T. Salmi, S. Vinciguerra, T. E. Riley, Y. Kini, A. L. Watts, B. Dorsman, S. Bogdanov, S. Guil- lot, P. S. Ray, D. J. Reardon, R. A. Remillard, A. V. Bilous, D. Huppenkothen, J. M. Lattimer, N. Rutherford, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. M. Morsink, and W. C. G. Ho, A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437-47...

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Ecker and L

    C. Ecker and L. Rezzolla, Impact of large-mass constraints on the properties of neutron stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.519, 2615 (2023), arXiv:2209.08101 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Carreau, F

    T. Carreau, F. Gulminelli, and J. Margueron, Bayesian analysis of the crust-core transition with a compressible liquid-drop model, Eur. Phys. J. A55, 188 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    P. Char, C. Mondal, F. Gulminelli, and M. Oertel, Gener- alized description of neutron star matter with a nucleonic relativistic density functional, Phys. Rev. D108, 103045 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Gögelein, E

    P. Gögelein, E. N. E. v. Dalen, C. Fuchs, and H. Müther, Nuclear matter in the crust of neutron stars derived from realistic NN interactions, Phys. Rev. C77, 025802 (2008)

    work page 2008

  68. [68]

    Schürhoff, S

    T. Schürhoff, S. Schramm, and V. Dexheimer, Neutron stars with small radii—the role ofδ resonances, Astrophys. J. Lett.724, L74 (2010)

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    Dexheimer, R

    V. Dexheimer, R. Negreiros, and S. Schramm, Reconciling nuclear and astrophysical constraints, Phys. Rev. C92, 012801 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    Gaitanos, M

    T. Gaitanos, M. Di Toro, S. Typel, V. Baran, C. Fuchs, V. Greco, and H. Wolter, On the lorentz structure of the symmetry energy, Nucl. Phys. A732, 24 (2004)

    work page 2004

  71. [71]

    Grill, H

    F. Grill, H. Pais, C. m. c. Providência, I. Vidaña, and S. S. Avancini, Equation of state and thickness of the inner crust of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C90, 045803 (2014)

    work page 2014

  72. [72]

    and Haensel, P., A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, A&A380, 151 (2001)

    Douchin, F. and Haensel, P., A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, A&A380, 151 (2001)

    work page 2001

  73. [73]

    Typel, G

    S. Typel, G. Röpke, T. Klähn, D. Blaschke, and H. H. Wolter, Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear mat- ter with light clusters, Phys. Rev. C81, 015803 (2010)

    work page 2010

  74. [74]

    Providência, M

    C. Providência, M. Fortin, H. Pais, and A. Rabhi, Hy- peronic Stars and the Nuclear Symmetry Energy, Fron- tiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences6, 10.3389/fs- pas.2019.00013 (2019)

    work page doi:10.3389/fs- 2019

  75. [75]

    Chen and J

    W.-C. Chen and J. Piekarewicz, Building relativistic mean field models for finite nuclei and neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C90, 044305 (2014)

    work page 2014

  76. [76]

    Negreiros, L

    R. Negreiros, L. Tolos, M. Centelles, A. Ramos, and V. Dexheimer, Cooling of small and massive hyperonic stars, Astrophys. J.863, 104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    Oertel, C

    M. Oertel, C. Providência, F. Gulminelli, and A. R. Raduta, Hyperons in neutron star matter within rela- tivistic mean-field models, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics42, 075202 (2015)

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    N. K. Glendenning and S. A. Moszkowski, Reconciliation of neutron-star masses and binding of theΛin hypernuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 2414 (1991)

    work page 1991

  79. [79]

    Hempel and J

    M. Hempel and J. Schaffner-Bielich, A statistical model for a complete supernova equation of state, Nucl. Phys. A837, 210 (2010)

    work page 2010

  80. [80]

    Hornick, L

    N. Hornick, L. Tolos, A. Zacchi, J.-E. Christian, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Relativistic parameterizations of neu- tron matter and implications for neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C98, 065804 (2018)

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.