arxiv: 2511.19533 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-24 · ⚛️ physics.optics · astro-ph.IM· physics.ins-det

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Experimental Demonstration of an On-Axis Laser Ranging Interferometer for Future Gravity Missions

Daikang Wei , Christoph Bode , Kohei Yamamoto , Yongho Lee , Germ\'an Fern\'andez Barranco , Vitali M\"uller , Miguel Dovale \'Alvarez , Juan Jos\'e Esteban Delgado

show 1 more author

Gerhard Heinzel

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 05:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics astro-ph.IMphysics.ins-det

keywords laser ranging interferometeron-axis LRIdifferential wavefront sensinggravity missionsnanometer rangingtilt-to-length couplingspacecraft attitude jitterGRACE-like missions

0 comments

The pith

An on-axis laser ranging interferometer achieves nanometer accuracy for inter-spacecraft distance measurements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper experimentally tests a laser ranging interferometer that transmits and receives beams along the same optical path between two benches. Active steering loops based on differential wavefront sensing keep the beams co-aligned while the benches rotate to simulate spacecraft attitude changes. Laboratory results show pointing stability below 10 micro-radians per square-root hertz across the 0.2 millihertz to 0.5 hertz band, stable carrier-to-noise performance over 15 hours, and ranging precision at the nanometer level. The authors present this monoaxial architecture as a workable option for future satellite missions that map Earth's gravity field by tracking tiny separations between spacecraft.

Core claim

The authors demonstrate that an on-axis laser ranging interferometer with a 7.3 MHz heterodyne frequency and active beam steering via differential wavefront sensing enables inter-spacecraft ranging measurements with nanometer accuracy. In tests that use hexapod rotations to replicate spacecraft jitter, the system delivers pointing stability below 10 urad per square root hertz between 0.2 mHz and 0.5 Hz, polarization-induced carrier-to-noise reductions of only 0.14 percent over 15 hours, and measurable tilt-to-length coupling through periodic scanning.

What carries the argument

On-axis LRI architecture that permits monoaxial transmission and reception of laser beams together with active beam-steering loops driven by differential wavefront sensing signals to maintain co-alignment between receiving and transmitting beams.

If this is right

The interferometric link maintains pointing stability below 10 urad per square root hertz in the 0.2 mHz to 0.5 Hz range under simulated attitude jitter.
Polarization fluctuations in the transmitting beam reduce the carrier-to-noise-density ratio by only 0.14 percent over a continuous 15-hour measurement.
Tilt-to-length coupling can be quantified by periodic hexapod scanning of the optical benches.
The measured performance supports the on-axis LRI as a candidate for future GRACE-like gravity missions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The single-path design could reduce the mass and alignment complexity of optical benches relative to separate transmit and receive paths.
Active steering might permit looser initial satellite pointing requirements, enabling more flexible formation geometries in future missions.
Extended vacuum and thermal-cycling tests would be the next logical step to confirm that lab results hold under orbital conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The hexapod-driven rotations and laboratory environment sufficiently replicate the full range of spacecraft attitude jitter, thermal drifts, and vacuum conditions that will occur in actual orbit.

What would settle it

An orbital test that records ranging fluctuations significantly larger than a few nanometers under real attitude jitter and thermal variations would show that the demonstrated performance does not translate to space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.19533 by Christoph Bode, Daikang Wei, Gerhard Heinzel, Germ\'an Fern\'andez Barranco, Juan Jos\'e Esteban Delgado, Kohei Yamamoto, Miguel Dovale \'Alvarez, Vitali M\"uller, Yongho Lee.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Concept sketch of the inter-spacecraft laser interferometry in on-axis configuration. S/C, spacecraft; FIOS, fiber [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic of reference point arrangements in an on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic of the experimental setup. The red, blue, green, and black dashed lines denote the laser beam from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Beam configurations in the beam steering loop: (a) ideal alignment with zero DWS signal, (b) misalignment with non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Measured open-loop transfer function of the laser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Intensity profile and (b) wavefront profile of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Block diagram of the beam steering loop. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Measured open-loop transfer functions of the beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Angular scanning of the hexapod causes changes in the DWS and DPS signals in open-loop operation of the beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Schematic of the optical detection used in the on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Amplitude spectral density of the hexapod mo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12. Temporal evolution of TX beam polarization state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13. (a) Round-trip longitudinal path length variations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: FIG. 14. Hexapod angular displacement spectral density dur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We experimentally demonstrate a novel interferometric architecture for next-generation gravity missions, featuring a laser ranging interferometer (LRI) that enables monoaxial transmission and reception of laser beams between two optical benches with a heterodyne frequency of 7.3 MHz. Active beam steering loops, utilizing differential wavefront sensing (DWS) signals, ensure co-alignment between the receiving (RX) beam and the transmitting (TX) beam. With spacecraft attitude jitter simulated by hexapod-driven rotations, the interferometric link achieves a pointing stability below 10 urad/$\mathrm{\sqrt{Hz}}$ in the frequency range between 0.2 mHz and 0.5 Hz, and the fluctuation of the TX beam's polarization state results in a reduction of 0.14\% in the carrier-to-noise-density ratio over a 15-hour continuous measurement. Additionally, tilt-to-length (TTL) coupling is experimentally investigated using the periodic scanning of the hexapod. Experimental results show that the on-axis LRI enables the inter-spacecraft ranging measurements with nanometer accuracy, making it a potential candidate for future GRACE-like missions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Lab demo of on-axis LRI with DWS steering hits the stability numbers under hexapod jitter, but the jump to orbital conditions is still an assumption.

read the letter

The main point is that this group built and ran an on-axis laser ranging interferometer in the lab, using active differential wavefront sensing loops to steer the beam and keep transmit and receive aligned on the same axis. Under hexapod rotations that mimic spacecraft attitude jitter, they report pointing stability below 10 urad per square root hertz between 0.2 mHz and 0.5 Hz, a 0.14 percent carrier-to-noise drop over 15 hours, and nanometer-level ranging with some tilt-to-length data from the scans. That architecture and the closed-loop control are the concrete new pieces relative to earlier off-axis GRACE-style work. The measurements are direct, not derived from models, which keeps the circularity low. The numbers line up with what the abstract claims and give a practical sense of how the monoaxial link behaves when the bench is moving. The weak part is the environment. Hexapod rotations cover attitude jitter, but they do not reproduce thermal cycling, vacuum outgassing, or radiation effects that can add length noise through expansion or other drifts. Without a full error budget, baseline comparisons to existing systems, or longer statistical runs, it is hard to judge how much headroom exists once the instrument leaves the lab. The paper is aimed at teams designing the next round of space gravity instruments or similar heterodyne interferometers. Instrument builders and mission planners who need hardware-level data on beam steering and ranging will get the most out of it. It is worth sending to peer review because the experimental setup is straightforward and the reported metrics address the central performance claims, even though the orbital qualification step will need more work.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript experimentally demonstrates a novel on-axis laser ranging interferometer (LRI) for future gravity missions such as GRACE. It uses monoaxial transmission/reception at a 7.3 MHz heterodyne frequency with active beam steering via differential wavefront sensing (DWS) to maintain co-alignment. Spacecraft attitude jitter is simulated via hexapod rotations, yielding pointing stability below 10 μrad/√Hz (0.2 mHz–0.5 Hz), 0.14% CNR reduction over 15 hours, and TTL coupling characterization; the authors conclude this enables nanometer-accuracy inter-spacecraft ranging suitable for GRACE-like missions.

Significance. If the laboratory results translate to orbital conditions, the on-axis architecture with integrated TX/RX and DWS steering could simplify optical bench designs for next-generation gravity missions by eliminating separate beam paths. The work supplies direct experimental metrics on pointing stability and polarization effects without reliance on fitted models, which strengthens its contribution to the field of space-based laser interferometry.

major comments (3)

[Section 3] Section 3 (Experimental Setup): The hexapod-driven rotations are used to simulate spacecraft attitude jitter for the pointing stability and TTL measurements, but the laboratory environment does not incorporate or bound the effects of orbital thermal cycling, radiation, or vacuum levels on thermal expansion and length noise; this directly limits support for the nanometer-ranging claim under flight conditions.
[Section 4] Section 4 (Results): The reported values for pointing stability (<10 μrad/√Hz) and CNR fluctuation (0.14% over 15 h) are presented without an accompanying error budget, uncertainty analysis, or comparison to off-axis LRI baselines, which is load-bearing for assessing whether the demonstrated performance meets GRACE-like mission requirements.
[Conclusion] Conclusion: The statement that the on-axis LRI is a 'potential candidate for future GRACE-like missions' lacks a quantitative mapping from the lab metrics to the specific noise budgets (e.g., ranging accuracy targets) required for such missions, weakening the central applicability claim.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract uses 'urad' instead of the standard 'μrad'; this notation should be corrected for consistency with optics literature.
A brief table or plot comparing the achieved stability to published GRACE-FO LRI performance would improve context without altering the core results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to address them.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Section 3] Section 3 (Experimental Setup): The hexapod-driven rotations are used to simulate spacecraft attitude jitter for the pointing stability and TTL measurements, but the laboratory environment does not incorporate or bound the effects of orbital thermal cycling, radiation, or vacuum levels on thermal expansion and length noise; this directly limits support for the nanometer-ranging claim under flight conditions.

Authors: We agree that the current laboratory setup does not simulate or bound the effects of orbital thermal cycling, radiation, or vacuum on thermal expansion and length noise. Our demonstration focuses on the core functionality of the on-axis LRI with active DWS-based beam steering under hexapod-simulated attitude jitter. The nanometer-ranging performance is shown through the achieved pointing stability and TTL characterization in this environment. In the revised version, we will add a paragraph in Section 3 discussing these limitations and their implications for flight conditions, along with references to how such effects are typically mitigated in space hardware. revision: yes
Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 (Results): The reported values for pointing stability (<10 μrad/√Hz) and CNR fluctuation (0.14% over 15 h) are presented without an accompanying error budget, uncertainty analysis, or comparison to off-axis LRI baselines, which is load-bearing for assessing whether the demonstrated performance meets GRACE-like mission requirements.

Authors: We will incorporate an error budget and uncertainty analysis into Section 4 of the revised manuscript. This will include estimates of uncertainties in the pointing stability measurements and CNR fluctuations, as well as a comparison to off-axis LRI systems based on published data from missions like GRACE-FO. These additions will provide a clearer assessment against GRACE-like requirements. revision: yes
Referee: [Conclusion] Conclusion: The statement that the on-axis LRI is a 'potential candidate for future GRACE-like missions' lacks a quantitative mapping from the lab metrics to the specific noise budgets (e.g., ranging accuracy targets) required for such missions, weakening the central applicability claim.

Authors: We will revise the conclusion to include a quantitative mapping of our laboratory metrics to GRACE-like mission noise budgets. For example, we will link the sub-10 μrad/√Hz pointing stability and the low TTL coupling to the nanometer ranging accuracy targets typically required (e.g., 1 nm/√Hz or better for inter-satellite ranging in next-generation gravity missions), supported by the experimental results and relevant mission specifications. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

Full replication of orbital environmental conditions (thermal cycling, radiation, vacuum) and their impact on system performance cannot be achieved in the laboratory and requires dedicated space qualification or in-flight testing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: all results are direct experimental measurements

full rationale

The paper reports laboratory measurements of pointing stability, CNR fluctuation, and TTL coupling using hexapod rotations to simulate attitude jitter. These quantities are obtained from direct interferometric readouts and scans rather than from any fitted model, self-referential definition, or derivation that reduces to its own inputs. No equations or predictions are presented that could exhibit self-definition, fitted-input renaming, or load-bearing self-citation chains. The central claim of nanometer ranging accuracy follows from the reported experimental data without intermediate theoretical steps that loop back to the same data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The demonstration rests on standard optical interferometry and wavefront sensing principles without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities; performance numbers are measured rather than derived from fitted models.

axioms (1)

standard math Standard heterodyne interferometry and differential wavefront sensing principles govern the optical link and alignment loops.
Invoked in the description of the 7.3 MHz heterodyne signal and DWS-based steering.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5539 in / 1268 out tokens · 87816 ms · 2026-05-17T05:52:54.592431+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Experimental results show that the on-axis LRI enables the inter-spacecraft ranging measurements with nanometer accuracy, making it a potential candidate for future GRACE-like missions.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean embed_strictMono_of_one_lt unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the interferometric link achieves a pointing stability below 10 µrad/√Hz ... TTL coupling ...

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

and thus do not affect our analysis here. To evaluate the co-alignment between the RX beam and the TX beam, the DWS signals from QPR1 and 9 200 120 40 40 120 200 Angle [µrad] (a) Pitch Yaw (b) 2.0 1.2 0.4 0.4 1.2 2.0 DWS signal [rad] (c) DWS1h DWS1v DWS2h DWS2v (d) 0 40 80 120 160 200 Scanning time in yaw [s] 0.30 0.19 0.08 0.03 0.14 0.25 DPS signal [W/W]...

work page 2019
[2]

B. D. Tapley, S. Bettadpur, M. Watkins, and C. Reigber, The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results, Geophysical research letters 31(2004)

work page 2004
[3]

Tapley, J

B. Tapley, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur, D. Chambers, M. Cheng, F. Condi, B. Gunter, Z. Kang, P. Nagel, R. Pastor, T. Pekker, S. Poole, and F. Wang, GGM02 – An improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE, 15 Journal of Geodesy79, 467 (2005)

work page 2005
[4]

B. D. Tapley, S. Bettadpur, J. C. Ries, P. F. Thomp- son, and M. M. Watkins, GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system, science305, 503 (2004)

work page 2004
[5]

R. P. Kornfeld, B. W. Arnold, M. A. Gross, N. T. Dahya, W. M. Klipstein, P. F. Gath, and S. Bettadpur, GRACE- FO: The gravity recovery and climate experiment follow- on mission, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets56, 931 (2019)

work page 2019
[6]

Bender, J

P. Bender, J. Conklin, and D. Wiese, Short-period mass variations and the next generation gravity mis- sion, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth130, e2024JB030290 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

Haagmans, C

R. Haagmans, C. Siemes, L. Massotti, O. Carraz, and P. Silvestrin, ESA’s next-generation gravity mission con- cepts, Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali31, 15 (2020)

work page 2020
[8]

Ghobadi-Far, S.-C

K. Ghobadi-Far, S.-C. Han, C. M. McCullough, D. N. Wiese, D.-N. Yuan, F. W. Landerer, J. Sauber, and M. M. Watkins, GRACE Follow-On laser ranging in- terferometer measurements uniquely distinguish short- wavelength gravitational perturbations, Geophysical Re- search Letters47, e2020GL089445 (2020)

work page 2020
[9]

Abich, A

K. Abich, A. Abramovici, B. Amparan, A. Baatzsch, B. B. Okihiro, D. C. Barr, M. P. Bize, C. Bogan, C. Braxmaier, M. J. Burke, K. C. Clark, C. Dahl, K. Dahl, K. Danzmann, M. A. Davis, G. De Vine, J. A. Dickson, S. Dubovitsky, A. Eckardt, T. Ester, G. F. Barranco, R. Flatscher, F. Flechtner, W. M. Folkner, S. Francis, M. S. Gilbert, F. Gilles, M. Gohlke, N....

work page 2019
[10]

Sheard, G

B. Sheard, G. Heinzel, K. Danzmann, D. Shaddock, W. Klipstein, and W. Folkner, Intersatellite laser ranging instrument for the GRACE follow-on mission, Journal of Geodesy86, 1083 (2012)

work page 2012
[11]

Heinzel, C

G. Heinzel, C. Braxmaier, K. Danzmann, P. Gath, J. Hough, O. Jennrich, U. Johann, A. R¨ udiger, M. Sal- lusti, and H. Schulte, Lisa interferometry: recent develop- ments, Classical and Quantum Gravity23, S119 (2006)

work page 2006
[12]

Sch¨ utze, G

D. Sch¨ utze, G. Stede, V. M¨ uller, O. Gerberding, T. Bandikova, B. S. Sheard, G. Heinzel, and K. Danz- mann, Laser beam steering for grace follow-on intersatel- lite interferometry, Optics express22, 24117 (2014)

work page 2014
[13]

F. W. Landerer, D. N. Wiese, M. Gross, F. M. Flecht- ner, H. Save, S. Fischer, C. M. McCullough, C. Dahle, S. V. Bettadpur, R. Gaston, and K. Snopek, Towards 30- years of mass change observations: GRACE Follow-On extended mission phase and GRACE-Continuity develop- ments, inAGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2024 (2024) pp. G21A–01

work page 2024
[14]

Nicklaus, K

K. Nicklaus, K. Voss, A. Feiri, M. Kaufer, C. Dahl, M. Herding, B. A. Curzadd, A. Baatzsch, J. Flock, M. Weller, V. M¨ uller, G. Heinzel, M. Misfeldt, and J. J. E. Delgado, Towards NGGM: Laser Tracking In- strument for the Next Generation of Gravity Missions, Remote Sensing14, 4089 (2022)

work page 2022
[15]

Nicklaus, S

K. Nicklaus, S. Cesare, L. Massotti, L. Bonino, S. Mot- tini, M. Pisani, and P. Silvestrin, Laser metrology con- cept consolidation for NGGM, CEAS Space Journal12, 313 (2020)

work page 2020
[16]

Sch¨ utze, V

D. Sch¨ utze, V. M¨ uller, G. Stede, B. S. Sheard, G. Heinzel, K. Danzmann, A. J. Sutton, and D. A. Shaddock, Retroreflector for GRACE follow-on: Vertex vs point of minimal coupling, Optics Express22, 9324 (2014)

work page 2014
[17]

R. L. Ward, R. Fleddermann, S. Francis, C. Mow- Lowry, D. Wuchenich, M. Elliot, F. Gilles, M. Herding, K. Nicklaus, J. Brown, J. Burke, S. Dligatch, D. Far- rant, K. Green, J. Seckold, M. Blundell, R. Brister, C. Smith, K. Danzmann, G. Heinzel, D. Sch¨ utze, B. S. Sheard, W. Klipstein, D. E. McClelland, and D. A. Shad- dock, The design and construction of...

work page 2014
[18]

Mandel, A

O. Mandel, A. Sell, M. Chwalla, T. Schuldt, J. Krauser, D. Weise, and C. Braxmaier, Architecture and perfor- mance analysis of an optical metrology terminal for satellite-to-satellite laser ranging, Applied Optics59, 653 (2020)

work page 2020
[19]

Y. Yang, K. Yamamoto, M. Dovale ´Alvarez, D. Wei, J. J. Esteban Delgado, V. M¨ uller, J. Jia, and G. Heinzel, On- axis optical bench for laser ranging instruments in future gravity missions, Sensors22, 2070 (2022)

work page 2070
[20]

R. W. P. Drever, J. L. Hall, F. V. Kowalski, J. Hough, G. M. Ford, A. J. Munley, and H. Ward, Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator, Applied Physics B31, 97 (1983)

work page 1983
[21]

M¨ uller,Design considerations for future geodesy mis- sions and for space laser interferometry, Ph.D

V. M¨ uller,Design considerations for future geodesy mis- sions and for space laser interferometry, Ph.D. thesis, Hannover: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universit¨ at Han- nover (2017)

work page 2017
[22]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Ba- rausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bor- toluzzi, J. Camp, C. Caprini, V. Cardoso, M. Colpi, J. Conklin, N. Cornish, C. Cutler, K. Danzmann, R. Dolesi, L. Ferraioli, V. Ferroni, E. Fitzsimons, J. Gair, L. G. Bote, D. Giardini, F. Gibert, C. Grimani, H. Hal- loin, G. Heinzel, T. Herto...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[23]

R. P. Kornfeld, B. W. Arnold, M. A. Gross, N. T. Dahya, W. M. Klipstein, P. F. Gath, and S. Bettadpur, GRACE- 16 FO: the gravity recovery and climate experiment follow- on mission, Journal of spacecraft and rockets56, 931 (2019)

work page 2019
[24]

H. Gu, X. Chen, C. Zhang, H. Jiang, and S. Liu, Study of the retardance of a birefringent waveplate at tilt inci- dence by mueller matrix ellipsometer, Journal of Optics 20, 015401 (2017)

work page 2017
[25]

Gerberding, B

O. Gerberding, B. Sheard, I. Bykov, J. Kullmann, J. J. E. Delgado, K. Danzmann, and G. Heinzel, Phasemeter core for intersatellite laser heterodyne interferometry: mod- elling, simulations and experiments, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity30, 235029 (2013)

work page 2013
[26]

Shaddock, B

D. Shaddock, B. Ware, P. Halverson, R. Spero, and B. Klipstein, Overview of the LISA Phasemeter, inAIP conference proceedings, Vol. 873 (American Institute of Physics, 2006) pp. 654–660

work page 2006
[27]

T. S. Schwarze,Phase extraction for laser interferome- try in space: phase readout schemes and optical testing, Ph.D. thesis, Hannover: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Uni- versit¨ at Hannover (2018)

work page 2018
[28]

Heinzel, M

G. Heinzel, M. D. ´Alvarez, A. Pizzella, N. Brause, and J. J. E. Delgado, Tracking length and differential- wavefront-sensing signals from quadrant photodiodes in heterodyne interferometers with digital phase-locked- loop readout, Physical Review Applied14, 054013 (2020)

work page 2020
[29]

Wanner, G

G. Wanner, G. Heinzel, E. Kochkina, C. Mahrdt, B. S. Sheard, S. Schuster, and K. Danzmann, Methods for sim- ulating the readout of lengths and angles in laser inter- ferometers with gaussian beams, Optics communications 285, 4831 (2012)

work page 2012
[30]

Morrison, B

E. Morrison, B. J. Meers, D. I. Robertson, and H. Ward, Automatic alignment of optical interferometers, Applied Optics33, 5041 (1994)

work page 1994
[31]

Daniel,Intersatellite laser interferometry Test envi- ronments for GRACE Follow-On, Ph.D

S. Daniel,Intersatellite laser interferometry Test envi- ronments for GRACE Follow-On, Ph.D. thesis, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover (2015)

work page 2015
[32]

Newport Corporation,HXP Controller User’s Man- ual: Hexapod Motion Controller, Newport Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA (2015)

work page 2015
[33]

Goswami, S

S. Goswami, S. P. Francis, T. Bandikova, and R. E. Spero, Analysis of grace follow-on laser ranging interfer- ometer derived inter-satellite pointing angles, IEEE Sen- sors Journal21, 19209 (2021)

work page 2021
[34]

Wegener, V

H. Wegener, V. M¨ uller, G. Heinzel, and M. Misfeldt, Tilt- to-length coupling in the grace follow-on laser ranging in- terferometer, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets57, 1362 (2020)

work page 2020
[35]

H. P. Wegener,Analysis of tilt-to-length coupling in the GRACE follow-on laser ranging interferometer, Ph.D. thesis, Hannover: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universit¨ at Hannover (2022)

work page 2022
[36]

Tr¨ obs and G

M. Tr¨ obs and G. Heinzel, Improved spectrum estimation from digitized time series on a logarithmic frequency axis, Measurement39, 120 (2006)

work page 2006