pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.22383 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-27 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Complete one-loop QED corrections to D_s^+ leptonic decays and impact on the CKM unitarity test

Teppei Kitahara , Jun Miyamoto , Kota Sasaki
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 04:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords CKM unitarityD_s leptonic decaysone-loop QED correctionselectroweak radiative correctionsV_cs extractioncharm meson decayssoft photon resummationSirlin factor
0
0 comments X

The pith

Complete one-loop QED corrections to D_s^+ leptonic decays yield |V_cs| = 0.991 ± 0.007 and restore second-column CKM unitarity agreement with the Standard Model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the full one-loop electroweak and QED corrections to D_s^+ → ℓ^+ ν_ℓ for muon and tau leptons. These include short-distance effects beyond leading logarithms and long-distance soft-photon contributions with resummation that depend on the maximum energy of undetected photons. The usual inclusive-photon formulas do not match the experimental conditions for the muon mode, so the new corrections must be used instead. With latest data the extracted |V_cs| from D_s decays now produces a unitarity test for the second CKM column that agrees with Standard Model expectations. The work identifies the precision of these QED corrections as the present limiting factor for confirming unitarity.

Core claim

The central claim is that the complete one-loop electroweak-QED corrections to D_s^+ leptonic decays, incorporating both the short-distance Sirlin factor beyond leading-logarithmic approximation and the long-distance soft-photon corrections that depend on the maximum total energy of undetected photons together with their resummation, produce |V_cs|_{D_s} = 0.991 ± 0.007 when applied to the latest data, and that properly including these radiative corrections is essential to bring the second-column CKM unitarity tests into agreement with the Standard Model expectation.

What carries the argument

The complete one-loop electroweak and QED corrections that combine short-distance effects beyond leading logarithms with long-distance soft-photon corrections and resummation, adjusted to the experimental photon-energy cut for each decay mode.

If this is right

  • The extracted |V_cs| from D_s decays becomes consistent with CKM unitarity once the mode-specific QED corrections are used.
  • Universal electroweak corrections alone leave a mismatch; the additional long-distance soft-photon treatment is required for the muon mode.
  • Lattice QCD calculations that incorporate QED corrections would reduce the remaining uncertainty and strengthen the unitarity test.
  • The dominant uncertainty in the current CKM unitarity check shifts from experimental branching fractions or lattice form factors to the accuracy of the QED radiative corrections.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar mode-specific QED corrections will likely be needed for other charm-meson leptonic decays to maintain consistent unitarity checks across channels.
  • Direct measurements of the photon energy spectrum in D_s^+ decays could test the modeling of the long-distance soft-photon contribution.
  • If future lattice simulations include these radiative effects, the precision on |V_cs| could improve enough to probe possible new-physics contributions at the percent level.
  • The result underscores the general need in precision flavor physics to match theoretical radiative corrections to the precise experimental cuts on undetected particles.

Load-bearing premise

The long-distance soft-photon corrections, which depend on the maximum total energy of undetected photons, accurately match the actual experimental measurement conditions for the D_s^+ to mu nu channel.

What would settle it

A re-analysis of the same D_s^+ leptonic data that still finds the second-column CKM unitarity sum deviating from one after these specific short- and long-distance corrections are applied.

read the original abstract

Recently, a violation of the CKM unitarity condition has been reported in the latest charm-meson data and the latest lattice results, once the universal electroweak correction is taken into account. In this article, we analytically derive for the first time the complete one-loop electroweak (EW) and QED corrections to the $D_{s}^+ \to \ell^+ \nu_\ell$ decays for $\ell = \mu, \tau$. Our analysis incorporates both short-distance EW-QED corrections, which are beyond the leading-logarithmic approximation (the so-called Sirlin factor), and long-distance soft-photon corrections depending on the maximum total energy of undetected photons with their resummation. Although the inclusive photon QED corrections to the meson leptonic decays are well known, they do not match the actual measurement circumstances in $D_s^+ \to \mu^+ \nu_\mu$. We find $ |V_{cs}|_{D_s} = 0.991 \pm 0.007 $ from the latest data on $D_s^+$ leptonic decays. We show that properly including these radiative corrections is essential to bring the second-column CKM unitarity tests into agreement with the Standard Model expectation. The study emphasizes that the current limiting factor in confirming CKM unitarity is the precision of QED corrections, and it points out that improving lattice simulations, taking the QED corrections into account, would be desirable for a more robust confirmation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analytically derives the complete one-loop electroweak and QED corrections to D_s^+ → ℓ^+ ν_ℓ (ℓ=μ,τ), combining short-distance Sirlin-factor corrections beyond leading logarithms with long-distance soft-photon resummation that depends on a cutoff E_γ^max for undetected photons. It applies these corrections to recent experimental data to obtain |V_cs|_{D_s} = 0.991 ± 0.007 and argues that the corrections are required to restore second-row CKM unitarity to Standard Model expectations.

Significance. If the long-distance corrections accurately represent the experimental photon-veto and energy-cut conditions, the work supplies a more complete radiative correction for charm leptonic decays and demonstrates that QED effects can resolve the reported unitarity tension. The analytical treatment of both short- and long-distance pieces, together with the explicit statement that inclusive-photon formulae do not match measurement circumstances, is a clear technical contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. [long-distance corrections] Long-distance soft-photon corrections: the adopted value of the maximum undetected photon energy E_γ^max is stated to be chosen by theoretical convention rather than by folding the actual photon-veto efficiency, calorimeter threshold, and event-selection cuts from the cited Belle and BESIII analyses into the calculation. Because the correction enters at the few-per-mille level and directly determines the extracted |V_cs| and the unitarity test, an explicit matching to the experimental acceptance is required to substantiate the central numerical claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a short table comparing the size of the new short-distance Sirlin correction, the long-distance resummation, and the universal electroweak factor for both μ and τ modes.
  2. Notation for the cutoff energy (E_γ^max versus E_γ^cut) should be unified throughout the text and equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment on the long-distance corrections. We address the point below and describe the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Long-distance soft-photon corrections: the adopted value of the maximum undetected photon energy E_γ^max is stated to be chosen by theoretical convention rather than by folding the actual photon-veto efficiency, calorimeter threshold, and event-selection cuts from the cited Belle and BESIII analyses into the calculation. Because the correction enters at the few-per-mille level and directly determines the extracted |V_cs| and the unitarity test, an explicit matching to the experimental acceptance is required to substantiate the central numerical claim.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Our manuscript selects E_γ^max according to a standard theoretical convention that approximates the typical experimental resolution and undetected-photon energy scale in charm leptonic analyses. We agree that a more explicit connection to the specific photon-veto efficiencies, calorimeter thresholds, and selection cuts reported by Belle and BESIII would further strengthen the result. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph (and, if space permits, a short appendix) that (i) quotes the relevant experimental cuts from the cited papers, (ii) justifies our conventional choice as a representative value consistent with those cuts, and (iii) quantifies the numerical sensitivity of |V_cs| to reasonable variations of E_γ^max around the adopted value. The resulting uncertainty will be folded into the final error budget, thereby directly addressing the referee’s concern about substantiating the central numerical claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the QED correction derivation

full rationale

The paper performs an analytical derivation of complete one-loop EW and QED corrections (including short-distance Sirlin factor and long-distance soft-photon resummation) to D_s^+ leptonic decays. This perturbative calculation is independent of the experimental inputs and produces a correction factor that is then applied to external branching-ratio data to extract |V_cs|_{D_s} = 0.991 ± 0.007. The cutoff E_γ^max on undetected photons is an explicit modeling choice for matching measurement conditions, not a parameter fitted to the target CKM element or unitarity condition. No quoted equation or step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard perturbative QED and electroweak theory at one-loop order together with a domain-specific treatment of soft-photon resummation; no new free parameters or postulated entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Perturbative expansion of QED and electroweak interactions valid at one-loop order for these decays
    Invoked as the framework for deriving the short-distance corrections and the Sirlin factor.
  • domain assumption Soft-photon resummation accurately models the long-distance contribution when the maximum undetected photon energy is specified
    Used to match the theoretical correction to the experimental acceptance for undetected photons.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5579 in / 1606 out tokens · 43013 ms · 2026-05-17T04:58:09.340953+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction,

    M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, “CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction,” Prog. Theor. Phys.49(1973) 652–657.(page 1)

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    The CKM unitarity problem: A trace of new physics at the TeV scale?

    B. Belfatto, R. Beradze, and Z. Berezhiani, “The CKM unitarity problem: A trace of new physics at the TeV scale?” Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 149[arXiv:1906.02714].(page 2). – 31 – 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Emax (MeV) 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 □(D+ s → µ+νµγ; Eγ < E max)/□(D+ s → µ+νµγ) Ratio (Exclusive/Inclusive) Emax = m2 Ds□m2 µ 2mDs Figure 14: The ratio of the sin...

    work page arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Vector-like Quark Interpretation for the CKM Unitarity Violation, Excess in Higgs Signal Strength, and Bottom Quark Forward-Backward Asymmetry,

    K. Cheung, W.-Y. Keung, C.-T. Lu, and P.-Y. Tseng, “Vector-like Quark Interpretation for the CKM Unitarity Violation, Excess in Higgs Signal Strength, and Bottom Quark Forward-Backward Asymmetry,” JHEP05(2020) 117[arXiv:2001.02853]

    work page arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Are the CKM anomalies induced by vector-like quarks? Limits from flavor changing and Standard Model precision tests,

    B. Belfatto and Z. Berezhiani, “Are the CKM anomalies induced by vector-like quarks? Limits from flavor changing and Standard Model precision tests,” JHEP10(2021) 079 [arXiv:2103.05549]

    work page arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Addressing the CKM unitarity problem with a vector-like up quark,

    G. C. Branco, J. T. Penedo, P. M. F. Pereira, M. N. Rebelo, and J. I. Silva-Marcos, “Addressing the CKM unitarity problem with a vector-like up quark,” JHEP07(2021) 099 [arXiv:2103.13409]

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Global fit of modified quark couplings to EW gauge bosons and vector-like quarks in light of the Cabibbo angle anomaly,

    A. Crivellin, M. Kirk, T. Kitahara, and F. Mescia, “Global fit of modified quark couplings to EW gauge bosons and vector-like quarks in light of the Cabibbo angle anomaly,” JHEP03 (2023) 234[arXiv:2212.06862].(pages 2, 27)

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Muong−2and CKM unitarity in extra lepton models,

    M. Endo and S. Mishima, “Muong−2and CKM unitarity in extra lepton models,” JHEP 08(2020) 004[arXiv:2005.03933].(page 2)

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Global Electroweak Fit and Vector-Like Leptons in Light of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly,

    A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C. A. Manzari, and M. Montull, “Global Electroweak Fit and Vector-Like Leptons in Light of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly,” JHEP12(2020) 166 [arXiv:2008.01113]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Cabibbo anomaly versus electroweak precision tests: An exploration of extensions of the Standard Model,

    M. Kirk, “Cabibbo anomaly versus electroweak precision tests: An exploration of extensions of the Standard Model,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 035004[arXiv:2008.03261].(page 2)

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    A New Approach to a Global Fit of the CKM Matrix

    A. Hocker, H. Lacker, S. Laplace, and F. Le Diberder, “A New approach to a global fit of the CKM matrix,” Eur. Phys. J. C21(2001) 225–259[hep-ph/0104062].(page 2). [11]CKMfitter GroupCollaboration, “CP violation and the CKM matrix: Assessing the – 32 – impact of the asymmetricBfactories,” Eur. Phys. J. C41(2005) 1–131[hep-ph/0406184]. (page 2). [12]UTfitC...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  11. [11]

    $K\to\pi\nu\bar\nu$ and High Precision Determinations of the CKM Matrix

    G. Buchalla and A. J. Buras, “K→πν¯νand high precision determinations of the CKM matrix,” Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 6782–6789[hep-ph/9607447].(pages 2, 11)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  12. [12]

    Charm Quark Contribution to K+ -> pi+ nu anti-nu at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order

    A. J. Buras, M. Gorbahn, U. Haisch, and U. Nierste, “Charm quark contribution to K +→π+ν¯νat next-to-next-to-leading order,” JHEP11(2006) 002[hep-ph/0603079]. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 167 (2012)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    Emerging lattice approach to the K-Unitarity Triangle

    C. Lehner, E. Lunghi, and A. Soni, “Emerging lattice approach to the K-Unitarity Triangle,” Phys. Lett. B759(2016) 82–90[arXiv:1508.01801]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Light quark loops inK±→π±ννfrom vector meson dominance and update on the Kaon Unitarity Triangle,

    E. Lunghi and A. Soni, “Light quark loops inK±→π±ννfrom vector meson dominance and update on the Kaon Unitarity Triangle,” JHEP12(2024) 097[arXiv:2408.11190]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Natural complex plane for kaon CKM data: Framework, status, and future prospects,

    A. Dery, “Natural complex plane for kaon CKM data: Framework, status, and future prospects,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 053005[arXiv:2504.12386].(page 2). [19]Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)Collaboration, “FLAG Review 2024.” arXiv:2411.04268.(pages 2, 12, 25, 26)

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Improved Determination of the Neutron Lifetime

    A. T. Yue,et al., “Improved Determination of the Neutron Lifetime,” Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 222501[arXiv:1309.2623].(page 2)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    MeV sterile neutrino in light of the Cabibbo-angle anomaly,

    T. Kitahara and K. Tobioka, “MeV sterile neutrino in light of the Cabibbo-angle anomaly,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 115034[arXiv:2308.13003].(page 2)

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Lattice QCD Calculation of Electroweak Box Contributions to Superallowed Nuclear and Neutron Beta Decays,

    P.-X. Ma,et al., “Lattice QCD Calculation of Electroweak Box Contributions to Superallowed Nuclear and Neutron Beta Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 191901 [arXiv:2308.16755].(page 2)

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Beyond Leading Logarithms ingV: The Semileptonic Weak Hamiltonian atO(αα2 s)

    F. Moretti, M. Gorbahn, and S. Jäger, “Beyond Leading Logarithms ingV: The Semileptonic Weak Hamiltonian atO(αα2 s).”arXiv:2510.27648.(page 2)

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    TheZα2 correction to superallowed beta decays in effective field theory and implications for|Vud|

    Z. Cao, R. J. Hill, R. Plestid, and P. Vander Griend, “TheZα2 correction to superallowed beta decays in effective field theory and implications for|Vud|.”arXiv:2511.05446

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Radiative corrections to superallowed beta decays at O(α2Z)

    Ò. L. Crosas and E. Mereghetti, “Radiative corrections to superallowed beta decays at O(α2Z).”arXiv:2511.05481.(page 2)

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Electroweak nuclear radii constrain the isospin breaking correction to Vud,

    C.-Y. Seng and M. Gorchtein, “Electroweak nuclear radii constrain the isospin breaking correction to Vud,” Phys. Lett. B838(2023) 137654[arXiv:2208.03037].(page 2)

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Data-driven reevaluation of ft values in superallowedβ decays,

    C.-Y. Seng and M. Gorchtein, “Data-driven reevaluation of ft values in superallowedβ decays,” Phys. Rev. C109(2024) 045501[arXiv:2309.16893]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa unitarity deficit reduction via finite nuclear size,

    M. Gorchtein, V. Katyal, B. Ohayon, B. K. Sahoo, and C.-Y. Seng, “Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa unitarity deficit reduction via finite nuclear size,” Phys. Rev. Res.7(2025) L042002[arXiv:2502.17070].(page 2)

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    On the Statistical Treatment of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly,

    Y. Grossman, E. Passemar, and S. Schacht, “On the Statistical Treatment of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly,” JHEP07(2020) 068[arXiv:1911.07821].(page 2). – 33 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Global Fit to Modified Neutrino Couplings and the Cabibbo-Angle Anomaly,

    A. M. Coutinho, A. Crivellin, and C. A. Manzari, “Global Fit to Modified Neutrino Couplings and the Cabibbo-Angle Anomaly,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 071802 [arXiv:1912.08823].(page 2)

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    QED Corrections to Hadronic Processes in Lattice QCD

    N. Carrasco,et al., “QED Corrections to Hadronic Processes in Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 91(2015) 074506[arXiv:1502.00257].(pages 2, 14)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    Finite-Volume QED Corrections to Decay Amplitudes in Lattice QCD

    V. Lubicz,et al., “Finite-Volume QED Corrections to Decay Amplitudes in Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 034504[arXiv:1611.08497]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    First lattice calculation of the QED corrections to leptonic decay rates

    D. Giusti,et al., “First lattice calculation of the QED corrections to leptonic decay rates,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 072001[arXiv:1711.06537]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Light-meson leptonic decay rates in lattice QCD+QED,

    M. Di Carlo,et al., “Light-meson leptonic decay rates in lattice QCD+QED,” Phys. Rev. D 100(2019) 034514[arXiv:1904.08731]

    work page arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Comparison of lattice QCD+QED predictions for radiative leptonic decays of light mesons with experimental data,

    R. Frezzotti,et al., “Comparison of lattice QCD+QED predictions for radiative leptonic decays of light mesons with experimental data,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 053005 [arXiv:2012.02120].(page 2)

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Constraining |Vcs| and physics beyond the Standard Model from exclusive (semi)leptonic charm decays,

    C. Bolognani, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and K. K. Vos, “Constraining |Vcs| and physics beyond the Standard Model from exclusive (semi)leptonic charm decays,” JHEP09(2024) 099[arXiv:2407.06145].(pages 3, 24, 25, 26)

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Parametrization of the Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix,

    L. Wolfenstein, “Parametrization of the Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix,” Phys. Rev. Lett.51 (1983) 1945.(page 3)

    work page 1983

  34. [34]

    Soft-Photon Corrections to $\bar{B} \to D \tau^{-} \bar{\nu}_{\tau}$ Relative to $\bar{B} \to D \mu^{-} \bar{\nu}_{\mu}$

    S. de Boer, T. Kitahara, and I. Nisandzic, “Soft-Photon Corrections to¯B→Dτ− ¯ντRelative to ¯B→Dµ− ¯νµ,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 261804[arXiv:1803.05881].(pages 3, 17, 18)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Weak Hamiltonian, CP Violation and Rare Decays

    A. J. Buras, “Weak Hamiltonian, CP violation and rare decays,” inLes Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics, Session 68: Probing the Standard Model of Particle Interactions, pp. 281–539. 1998.hep-ph/9806471.(pages 3, 7)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  36. [36]

    Current Algebra Formulation of Radiative Corrections in Gauge Theories and the Universality of the Weak Interactions,

    A. Sirlin, “Current Algebra Formulation of Radiative Corrections in Gauge Theories and the Universality of the Weak Interactions,” Rev. Mod. Phys.50(1978) 573. [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 50, 905 (1978)].(pages 3, 10)

    work page 1978

  37. [37]

    LargemW,mZ Behavior of theO(α)Corrections to Semileptonic Processes Mediated byW,

    A. Sirlin, “LargemW,mZ Behavior of theO(α)Corrections to Semileptonic Processes Mediated byW,” Nucl. Phys. B196(1982) 83–92.(pages 9, 11)

    work page 1982

  38. [38]

    On Some General Properties of theO(α)Corrections to Parity Violation in Atoms,

    W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, “On Some General Properties of theO(α)Corrections to Parity Violation in Atoms,” Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 75. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 31, 213 (1985)]

    work page 1984

  39. [39]

    Radiative Corrections toβDecay and the Possibility of a Fourth Generation,

    W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, “Radiative Corrections toβDecay and the Possibility of a Fourth Generation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 22.(pages 3, 10, 11). [44]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 030001. and 2025 update available at the PDG websitehttps://pdg.lbl.gov. (pages 4, 5, 8, 10, 14, 23, 25, 26)

    work page 1986

  40. [40]

    Calculation of the QED Coupling alpha (M_Z) in the Modified Minimal-Subtraction Scheme

    J. Erler, “Calculation of the QED couplingˆα(MZ)in the modified minimal subtraction scheme,” Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 054008[hep-ph/9803453].(page 5)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  41. [41]

    Radiative Corrections in theSU(2)L×U(1)Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework,

    A. Sirlin, “Radiative Corrections in theSU(2)L×U(1)Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework,” Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 971–981.(page 5). – 34 –

    work page 1980

  42. [42]

    General renormalization of the gauge invariant perturbation expansion near the Z0 resonance,

    R. G. Stuart, “General renormalization of the gauge invariant perturbation expansion near the Z0 resonance,” Phys. Lett. B272(1991) 353–358.(page 8)

    work page 1991

  43. [43]

    On the Precise Determination of the Fermi Coupling Constant from the Muon Lifetime

    T. van Ritbergen and R. G. Stuart, “On the precise determination of the Fermi coupling constant from the muon lifetime,” Nucl. Phys. B564(2000) 343–390[hep-ph/9904240]. (pages 5, 8, 10)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  44. [44]

    QCD Nonleading Corrections to Weak Decays in Dimensional Regularization and ’t Hooft-Veltman Schemes,

    A. J. Buras and P. H. Weisz, “QCD Nonleading Corrections to Weak Decays in Dimensional Regularization and ’t Hooft-Veltman Schemes,” Nucl. Phys. B333(1990) 66–99.(pages 5, 28)

    work page 1990

  45. [45]

    Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields,

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, “Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B44(1972) 189–213.(page 6)

    work page 1972

  46. [46]

    Dimensional Renormalization: The Number of Dimensions as a Regularizing Parameter,

    C. G. Bollini and J. J. Giambiagi, “Dimensional Renormalization: The Number of Dimensions as a Regularizing Parameter,” Nuovo Cim. B12(1972) 20–26

    work page 1972

  47. [47]

    Dimensional Renormalization and the Action Principle,

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison, “Dimensional Renormalization and the Action Principle,” Commun. Math. Phys.52(1977) 11–38.(page 6)

    work page 1977

  48. [48]

    Dimensional regularization and Breitenlohner-Maison/’t Hooft-Veltman scheme forγ5 applied to chiral YM theories: full one-loop counterterm and RGE structure,

    H. Bélusca-Maïto, A. Ilakovac, M. Mađor-Božinović, and D. Stöckinger, “Dimensional regularization and Breitenlohner-Maison/’t Hooft-Veltman scheme forγ5 applied to chiral YM theories: full one-loop counterterm and RGE structure,” JHEP08(2020) 024 [arXiv:2004.14398].(page 8)

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Radiative corrections to Fermi interactions,

    T. Kinoshita and A. Sirlin, “Radiative corrections to Fermi interactions,” Phys. Rev.113 (1959) 1652–1660.(page 8)

    work page 1959

  50. [50]

    The Mass Ratiomc/mb in Semileptonic b-Decays,

    Y. Nir, “The Mass Ratiomc/mb in Semileptonic b-Decays,” Phys. Lett. B221(1989) 184–190

    work page 1989

  51. [51]

    Complete 2-loop Quantum Electrodynamic Contributions to the Muon Lifetime in the Fermi Model

    T. van Ritbergen and R. G. Stuart, “Complete two loop quantum electrodynamic contributions to the muon lifetime in the Fermi model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 488–491 [hep-ph/9808283].(page 9)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  52. [52]

    Second Order Corrections to the Muon Lifetime and the Semileptonic B Decay

    M. Steinhauser and T. Seidensticker, “Second order corrections to the muon lifetime and the semileptonic B decay,” Phys. Lett. B467(1999) 271–278[hep-ph/9909436]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  53. [53]

    Considerations Concerning the Radiative Corrections to Muon Decay in the Fermi and Standard Theories

    A. Ferroglia, G. Ossola, and A. Sirlin, “Considerations concerning the radiative corrections to muon decay in the Fermi and standard theories,” Nucl. Phys. B560(1999) 23–32 [hep-ph/9905442]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    Mass effects in muon and semileptonic b -> c decays

    A. Pak and A. Czarnecki, “Mass effects in muon and semileptonicb→cdecays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 241807[arXiv:0803.0960]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  55. [55]

    Third order corrections to the semileptonic b→c and the muon decays,

    M. Fael, K. Schönwald, and M. Steinhauser, “Third order corrections to the semileptonic b→c and the muon decays,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 016003[arXiv:2011.13654]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Three-loop corrections to the muon and heavy quark decay rates,

    M. Czakon, A. Czarnecki, and M. Dowling, “Three-loop corrections to the muon and heavy quark decay rates,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) L111301[arXiv:2104.05804].(page 8)

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Radiative Corrections to Neutrino Induced Neutral Current Phenomena in theSU(2)L×U(1)Theory,

    W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, “Radiative Corrections to Neutrino Induced Neutral Current Phenomena in theSU(2)L×U(1)Theory,” Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2695. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 31, 213 (1985)].(page 9)

    work page 1980

  58. [58]

    QED effects in inclusive semi-leptonic B decays,

    D. Bigi, M. Bordone, P. Gambino, U. Haisch, and A. Piccione, “QED effects in inclusive semi-leptonic B decays,” JHEP11(2023) 163[arXiv:2309.02849]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 078 (2025)].(pages 10, 11). – 35 –

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Radiative corrections toπl2 decays,

    W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, “Radiative corrections toπl2 decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.71 (1993) 3629–3632.(page 11)

    work page 1993

  60. [60]

    Radiative Corrections and SemileptonicBDecays,

    D. Atwood and W. J. Marciano, “Radiative Corrections and SemileptonicBDecays,” Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 1736.(page 11)

    work page 1990

  61. [61]

    Electroweak Corrections to the Charm Quark Contribution to K+ -> pi+ nu nu-bar

    J. Brod and M. Gorbahn, “Electroweak Corrections to the Charm Quark Contribution to K +→π+ν¯ν,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 034006[arXiv:0805.4119].(page 11)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  62. [62]

    Semileptonic weak Hamiltonian to $\mathcal{O}(\alpha \alpha_s(\mu_{\mathrm{Lattice}}))$ in momentum-space subtraction schemes

    M. Gorbahn, S. Jäger, F. Moretti, and E. van der Merwe, “Semileptonic weak Hamiltonian toO(ααs) in momentum-space subtraction schemes,” JHEP01(2023) 159 [arXiv:2209.05289].(page 11)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    A suggestion on the theory of theπ→e+νtoπ→µ+ν ratio ,

    R. Gatto and M. A. Ruderman, “A suggestion on the theory of theπ→e+νtoπ→µ+ν ratio ,” Nuovo Cim.8(1958) 775–777.(page 12)

    work page 1958

  64. [64]

    Short and Long Distance Effects in the Decay $\tau \to \pi \nu_\tau (\gamma)$

    R. Decker and M. Finkemeier, “Short and long distance effects in the decayτ→πντ(γ),” Nucl. Phys. B438(1995) 17–53[hep-ph/9403385]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  65. [65]

    Everyone Makes Mistakes - Including Feynman

    T. Kinoshita, “Everyone makes mistakes: Including Feynman,” J. Phys. G29(2003) 9–22 [hep-ph/0101197].(page 12)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  66. [66]

    First lattice calculation of radiative leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons,

    A. Desiderioet al., “First lattice calculation of radiative leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 014502[arXiv:2006.05358].(page 12)

    work page arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Methods for high-precision determinations of radiative-leptonic decay form factors using lattice QCD,

    D. Giusti, C. F. Kane, C. Lehner, S. Meinel, and A. Soni, “Methods for high-precision determinations of radiative-leptonic decay form factors using lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 107(2023) 074507[arXiv:2302.01298]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Lattice calculation of the Ds meson radiative form factors over the full kinematical range,

    R. Frezzotti,et al., “Lattice calculation of the Ds meson radiative form factors over the full kinematical range,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 074505[arXiv:2306.05904].(page 12). [74]BESIIICollaboration, “Measurement of the absolute branching fractions for purely leptonic D+ s decays,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 052009[arXiv:2102.11734].(pages 12, 19). [75]BESIIICol...

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes,

    T. Kinoshita, “Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes,” J. Math. Phys.3(1962) 650–677. (page 12)

    work page 1962

  70. [70]

    Degenerate Systems and Mass Singularities,

    G. Feinberg, ed., “Degenerate Systems and Mass Singularities,” Phys. Rev.133(1964) B1549–B1562.(page 12). – 36 –

    work page 1964

  71. [71]

    π→eν, π→eνγdecays and related processes,

    D. A. Bryman, P. Depommier, and C. Leroy, “π→eν, π→eνγdecays and related processes,” Phys. Rept.88(1982) 151–205.(page 13)

    work page 1982

  72. [72]

    The infrared divergence phenomena and high-energy processes,

    D. R. Yennie, S. C. Frautschi, and H. Suura, “The infrared divergence phenomena and high-energy processes,” Annals Phys.13(1961) 379–452.(page 14)

    work page 1961

  73. [73]

    Infrared photons and gravitons,

    S. Weinberg, “Infrared photons and gravitons,” Phys. Rev.140(1965) B516–B524.(page 17)

    work page 1965

  74. [74]

    Soft-photon corrections in multi-body meson decays

    G. Isidori, “Soft-photon corrections in multi-body meson decays,” Eur. Phys. J. C53(2008) 567–571[arXiv:0709.2439].(pages 14, 17, 30)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  75. [75]

    Radiative corrections toπ−edecay,

    T. Kinoshita, “Radiative corrections toπ−edecay,” Phys. Rev. Lett.2(1959) 477.(pages 15, 31)

    work page 1959

  76. [76]

    Rowe,Structure-dependent quantum electrodynamics in heavy meson physics

    M. Rowe,Structure-dependent quantum electrodynamics in heavy meson physics. PhD thesis, Edinburgh U., 2024.(page 16)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    PHOTOS: A Universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections in decays,

    E. Barberio, B. van Eijk, and Z. Was, “PHOTOS: A Universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections in decays,” Comput. Phys. Commun.66(1991) 115–128.(page 21)

    work page 1991

  78. [78]

    PHOTOS: A Universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections. Version 2.0,

    E. Barberio and Z. Was, “PHOTOS: A Universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections. Version 2.0,” Comput. Phys. Commun.79(1994) 291–308

    work page 1994

  79. [79]

    PHOTOS Monte Carlo: a precision tool for QED corrections in Z and W decays

    P. Golonka and Z. Was, “PHOTOS Monte Carlo: A Precision tool for QED corrections inZ andWdecays,” Eur. Phys. J. C45(2006) 97–107[hep-ph/0506026]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  80. [80]

    PHOTOS Interface in C++; Technical and Physics Documentation

    N. Davidson, T. Przedzinski, and Z. Was, “PHOTOS interface in C++: Technical and Physics Documentation,” Comput. Phys. Commun.199(2016) 86–101[arXiv:1011.0937]. (page 21). [93]HPQCDCollaboration, “B→K and D→K form factors from fully relativistic lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 014510[arXiv:2207.12468].(page 24). [94]Fermilab Lattice, MILCCollaboration...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.