pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.10850 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-11 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

F(R,..) theories from the point of view of the Hamiltonian approach: non-vacuum Anisotropic Bianchi type I cosmological model

J. Socorro , Juan Luis P\'erez , Luis Rey D\'iaz-Barr\'on , Abraham Espinoza Garc\'ia , Sinuh\'e P\'erez Pay\'an
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 22:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords F(R) gravityHamiltonian formalismBianchi type Ibarotropic fluidanisotropic cosmologyclassical solutionsgauge choices
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Hamiltonian approach to F(R) gravity yields explicit classical solutions for the anisotropic Bianchi type I model with barotropic matter in the N=1 and N=6ABCD=6η³D gauges.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper applies the Hamiltonian formulation to F(R) theories of gravity within an anisotropic Bianchi type I cosmological model that contains standard matter in the form of a barotropic fluid obeying P equals gamma rho. It derives the classical solutions under two specific gauge choices, N equals 1 and N equals 6ABCD equals 6 eta cubed D, and shows that these recover expressions commonly inserted by hand as ansatzes when solving the field equations directly. Vacuum solutions are also obtained for comparison. A sympathetic reader would care because the work demonstrates that the Hamiltonian method produces concrete, usable cosmologies in modified gravity without needing to assume the forms of the solutions in advance.

Core claim

In the Hamiltonian approach to F(R) gravity for the non-vacuum anisotropic Bianchi type I model with barotropic fluid equation of state P equals gamma rho, classical solutions are obtained in the N=1 gauge and the N=6ABCD equals 6 eta cubed D gauge. These solutions recover results that are usually employed as ansatzes to solve the Einstein field equations, and the vacuum case is presented for completeness.

What carries the argument

The Hamiltonian constraint of F(R) gravity reduced on the Bianchi type I metric under the two gauge choices N=1 and N=6ABCD=6η³D that allow explicit integration for the directional scale factors.

If this is right

  • The explicit solutions give concrete expansion histories for each spatial direction in the presence of modified gravity and matter.
  • The two gauge choices produce equivalent physical results, confirming that the dynamics are independent of the time slicing chosen.
  • Vacuum solutions serve as a reference case against which the effects of the barotropic fluid can be compared directly.
  • The recovered ansatz forms can be inserted into numerical codes or further analytic studies of early-universe anisotropy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Hamiltonian reduction might be applied to other Bianchi types to test whether anisotropy persists or damps in F(R) models.
  • The gauge N=6ABCD=6η³D may correspond to a volume-weighted time coordinate that simplifies the matter coupling, offering a natural choice for studying bounces or singularities.
  • These solutions could be used to generate templates for anisotropic signatures in the cosmic microwave background within modified gravity scenarios.

Load-bearing premise

The Hamiltonian formulation of F(R) gravity can be applied to the Bianchi type I model with barotropic matter without introducing extra degrees of freedom or inconsistencies that invalidate the classical solutions.

What would settle it

Plugging the derived scale-factor solutions back into the original F(R) field equations and finding that the effective stress-energy tensor fails to match a barotropic fluid for any choice of the function F(R).

read the original abstract

In this work, we will explore the effects of F(R) theories in the classical scheme using the anisotropic Bianchi Type I cosmological model with standard matter employing a barotropic fluid with equation of state $P=\gamma \rho$. In this work we present the classical solutions in two gauge, N=1 and $N=6ABCD=6\eta^3D$ obtaining some results that are usually used as ansatz to solve the Einstein field equation. For completeness, we present the solutions in vacuum as well.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the Hamiltonian formulation of F(R,...) gravity to the anisotropic Bianchi type I cosmological model with barotropic matter (P=γρ). It derives classical solutions in the gauges N=1 and N=6ABCD=6η³D, presents the vacuum case for completeness, and states that the obtained solutions recover forms typically used as ansätze in Einstein field equations.

Significance. If the derivations and on-shell consistency checks hold, the work supplies a systematic Hamiltonian route to exact solutions in modified gravity that are often postulated rather than derived, offering a clearer foundation for anisotropic cosmologies in F(R) theories and their reduction to GR. The inclusion of both matter and vacuum sectors adds practical value for extensions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Solutions for N=1 gauge] § on solutions for N=1 gauge: the text asserts that the reported solutions satisfy the equations of motion, but provides no explicit substitution of the scale-factor expressions back into the Hamiltonian constraints or the original field equations to verify on-shell consistency; this verification is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Gauge N=6ABCD=6η³D] § on the N=6ABCD=6η³D gauge: the choice of lapse and its impact on the constraint algebra and elimination of the extra scalar degree of freedom is stated but not shown algebraically, leaving open whether the reported solutions remain consistent when the auxiliary field is retained off-shell.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Notation] The gauge notation N=6ABCD=6η³D is introduced without an immediate expansion or reference to its definition, which hinders readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications into the revised version to strengthen the presentation of the on-shell consistency and gauge details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Solutions for N=1 gauge] § on solutions for N=1 gauge: the text asserts that the reported solutions satisfy the equations of motion, but provides no explicit substitution of the scale-factor expressions back into the Hamiltonian constraints or the original field equations to verify on-shell consistency; this verification is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that explicit substitution of the derived scale-factor expressions into the Hamiltonian constraints and the original field equations would provide a clearer demonstration of on-shell consistency. In the revised manuscript we will add this verification step for the N=1 gauge solutions, showing that the reported expressions satisfy both the constraints and the equations of motion. This addition will be placed in the section presenting the N=1 solutions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Gauge N=6ABCD=6η³D] § on the N=6ABCD=6η³D gauge: the choice of lapse and its impact on the constraint algebra and elimination of the extra scalar degree of freedom is stated but not shown algebraically, leaving open whether the reported solutions remain consistent when the auxiliary field is retained off-shell.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the algebraic details of the constraint algebra under the gauge choice N=6ABCD=6η³D and the explicit elimination of the extra scalar degree of freedom were only stated rather than derived. In the revision we will include the step-by-step calculation of the constraint algebra for this gauge, demonstrating how the auxiliary field is handled and confirming that the solutions remain consistent when the auxiliary field is retained off-shell. This will be added to the section discussing the N=6ABCD=6η³D gauge. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper starts from the standard action for F(R,...) gravity coupled to barotropic matter, performs the Legendre transform to obtain the Hamiltonian and constraints, chooses two specific gauges (N=1 and N=6ABCD=6η³D), and integrates the resulting ODEs to obtain explicit classical solutions for the Bianchi-I scale factors. These solutions are shown to recover standard ansatze used in Einstein gravity as a limiting case, but the recovery is a consistency check rather than a definitional input. No parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives, and the auxiliary scalar degree of freedom is carried through the auxiliary-field formulation and eliminated on-shell without circular reduction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no identifiable free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work relies on standard assumptions of general relativity, modified gravity, and Hamiltonian constraint formalism without explicit new postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5416 in / 1119 out tokens · 40530 ms · 2026-05-16T22:59:30.250030+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Power law scalar potential in the Saez-Ballester like theory: Exact solutions in the Bianchi type I case

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Power-law scalar potentials in a Saez-Ballester-like theory for Bianchi I models produce the same volume evolution as exponential potentials but keep scalar fields dynamically present.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bergmann-Wagoner theory One of the first cases that we wish to analyze in this way generalized theory corresponds to the theories of Bergmann and Wagoner, including Brans-Dicke theory, making the following identities (page 123, [75]). A(ϕ) =ϕ, M ab(ϕc) =−2 ω(ϕ) ϕ , F(R) =R, C(ϕ) = 2ϕ λ(ϕ),(12) carrying out the operations and some arrangements, we are left...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Odintsov, Phys

    Shin’ichi Nojiri1 and Sergei D. Odintsov, Phys. Rep.505,59 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Quantum Grav.235117 (2006)

    Thomas P Sotiriou, Class. Quantum Grav.235117 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Olmo, Phys

    Gonzalo J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. D75, 023511 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Introduction to Modified Gravity and Gravitational Alternative for Dark Energy

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.4, 115 (2007)] [arXiv:hep-th/0601213]; arXiv:0807.0685

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    Bertolami, and J

    O. Bertolami, and J. P´ aramos, Phys. Rev. D77, 084018 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Quantum Grav.26235020 (2009)

    M Sharif and M Farasat Shamir, Class. Quantum Grav.26235020 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Plane Symmetric Solutions in f(R) Gravity

    M. Sharif and M. Farasat Shamir.Plane Symmetric Solutions in f(R) Gravity. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0912.1393

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0912.1393

  9. [9]

    Sotiriou, and V

    T.P. Sotiriou, and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 451 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    De Felice, S

    A. De Felice, S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Rel.13, 3 (2010

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Sharif and M

    M. Sharif and M. Farasat Shamir, Gen. Rel. Grav.42, 2643 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Rafael Ferraro, andFranco Fiorini, Phys. Rev. D84, 083518 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Rong-Jia Yang, EPL,9360001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Rafael Ferraro, and Mar´ ıa Jos´ e Guzm´ an, Phys. Rev. D97, 104028 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Rafael Ferraro, and Mar´ ıa Jos´ e Guzm´ an, Phys. Rev. D98124037 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Waeming, P

    A. Waeming, P. Channuie, Eur. Phys. J. C80(9), 802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Phys B 117214 (2025)

    David Senjaya, Nucl. Phys B 117214 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    of the dark Universe50, 102184 (2025)

    Sayani Maity, and Anamika Kotal, Phys. of the dark Universe50, 102184 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Modified Gauss-Bonnet theory as gravitational alternative for dark energy

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B631, 1 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0508049]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  20. [20]

    Dark energy problem: from phantom theory to modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and O. G. Gorbunova, J. Phys. A39, 6627 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0510183]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  21. [21]

    Dark energy in modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity: late-time acceleration and the hierarchy problem

    G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D73, 084007 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0601008]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  22. [22]

    Chakraborty, Gen

    S. Chakraborty, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.45, 2039 (2013)

    work page 2039

  23. [23]

    Sahoo, and M

    P.K. Sahoo, and M. Sivakumar, Astrophys. Space Sci.357, 60 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Moraes, and J.R.L

    P.H.R.S. Moraes, and J.R.L. Santos, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 60 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Harko, Shi-Dong Liang, Eur

    Min-Xing Xu, T. Harko, Shi-Dong Liang, Eur. Phys. J.C.76, 449 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Baffou, M.J.S

    E.H. Baffou, M.J.S. Houndjo and J. Tosssa, Astrophys Space Sci.361, 376 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Singh, K

    J.K. Singh, K. Bamba, R. Nagpal, and S.K.J. Pacif, Phys. Rev. D97, 123536 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Yousaf ,M

    Z. Yousaf ,M. Z. Bhatti, and T. Naseer, Eur. Phys. J. Plus (135, 323 (2020). 19

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Singh, S

    V. Singh, S. Jokweni, and A. Beesham, Universe10, 272 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Gauss-Bonnet dark energy

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D71, 123509 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0504052]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  31. [31]

    Socorro and Leonel Toledo, Eur

    J. Socorro and Leonel Toledo, Eur. Phys. J. Plus13171 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Socorro and O

    Leonel Toledo, J. Socorro and O. Loaiza, Advances in High Energy Phys.2016, 6705021 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Socorro, L

    J. Socorro, L. Toledo Sesma, Luis O. Pimentel , Advances in High Energy Physics2018, 3658086 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    M. Sami, A. Toporensky, P. V. Tretjakov and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Lett. B619, 193 (2005) [arXiv:hep- th/0504154]

    work page arXiv 2005

  35. [35]

    Dark energy and cosmological solutions in second-order string gravity

    G. Calcagni, S. Tsujikawa and M. Sami, Class. Quant. Grav.22, 3977 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0505193]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    Nonlocal Cosmology

    S. Deser and R. P. Woodard, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 111301 (2007) [arXiv:0706.2151 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Phantom and non-phantom dark energy: The cosmological relevance of non-locally corrected gravity

    S. Jhingan, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, M. Sami, I. Thongkool and S. Zerbini, Phys. Lett. B663, 424 (2008) [arXiv:0803.2613 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    Accelerating cosmologies from non-local higher-derivative gravity

    S. Capozziello, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B671(2009) 193 [arXiv:0809.1535 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  39. [39]

    One-loop effective action for non-local modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity in de Sitter space

    G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and S. Zerbini, Eur. Phys. J. C64, 483 (2009) [arXiv:0905.0543 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  40. [40]

    Gravity assisted dark energy dominance and cosmic acceleration

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B599, 137 (2004) [arXiv:astro-ph/0403622]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  41. [41]

    Mukohyama and L

    S. Mukohyama and L. Randall, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 211302 (2004)

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    Dark Energy Dominance and Cosmic Acceleration in First Order Formalism

    G. Allemandi, A. Borowiec, M. Francaviglia and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D72, 063505 (2005) [arXiv:gr-qc/0504057]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  43. [43]

    Bertolami, C.G

    O. Bertolami, C.G. B¨ ohmer, T. Harko and F.S.N. Lobo, Phys. Rev. D75, 104016 (2007)

    work page 2007

  44. [44]

    Harko and F.S.N

    T. Harko and F.S.N. Lobo, Eur. Phys. J. C.70, 373 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Wang and K

    J. Wang and K. Liao, Class. Quantum Grav.29, 215016 (2012)

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    Samanta, Int

    G.C. Samanta, Int. J. Theor. Phys.52, 2647 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    Harko, and Matthew J

    T. Harko, and Matthew J. Lake, Eur. Phys. J.C75, 60 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Harko, Eur

    Zahra Haghani, and T. Harko, Eur. Phys. J.C81, 615 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Jaybhaye, R

    L.V. Jaybhaye, R. Solanki, S. Mandal, and P.K. Sahoo., Phys. Lett. B831, 137148 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Myrzakulov, A.H.A

    Y. Myrzakulov, A.H.A. Alfedeel, M. Koussour, S. Muminov, E.I. Hassan, and J. Rayimbaev, Phys. Lett. B866, 139566 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Inflation and late-time cosmic acceleration in non-minimal Maxwell-$F(R)$ gravity and the generation of large-scale magnetic fields

    K. Bamba and S. D. Odintsov, JCAP0804, 024 (2008) [arXiv:0801.0954 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  52. [52]

    Inflationary cosmology and the late-time accelerated expansion of the universe in non-minimal Yang-Mills-$F(R)$ gravity and non-minimal vector-$F(R)$ gravity

    K. Bamba, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D77, 123532 (2008) [arXiv:0803.3384 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    W. Zhao, Y. Zhang and M. L. Tong, arXiv:0909.3874 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Modified F(R) Horava-Lifshitz gravity: a way to accelerating FRW cosmology

    M. Chaichian, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, M. Oksanen and A. Tureanu, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 185021 (2010) [arXiv:1001.4102 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  55. [55]

    Braneworld models of dark energy

    V. Sahni and Y. Shtanov, JCAP0311, 014 (2003) [arXiv:astro-ph/0202346]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  56. [56]

    Properties of singularities in (phantom) dark energy universe

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D71, 063004 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0501025]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  57. [57]

    J. D. Barrow, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, L79 (2004) [arXiv:gr-qc/0403084] 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  58. [58]

    Cotsakis and I

    S. Cotsakis and I. Klaoudatou, J. Geom. Phys.55, 306 (2005) [arXiv:gr-qc

    work page 2005

  59. [59]

    The final state and thermodynamics of dark energy universe

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D70, 103522 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0408170]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  60. [60]

    A proposal for covariant renormalizable field theory of gravity

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B691, 60 (2010) [arXiv:1004.3613 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  61. [61]

    Tiberiu Harko, Francisco S. N. Lobo, Shin’ichi Nojiri and Sergei D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D84, 024020 (2011)

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    Ferraro, AIP Conf

    R. Ferraro, AIP Conf. Proc1471103 (2012)

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    Nasr Ahmed and Anirudh Pradhan, Int. J. Theor. Phys.53289 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    Ferraro, Int

    R. Ferraro, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, (2) 2040022 (2020)

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    Sharif and M

    M. Sharif and M. Zubair JCAP03-028(2012)

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    Sharif and M

    M. Sharif and M. Zeeshan Gul, Fortschr. Phys. 2200184 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Aroonkumar Beesham, East European Journal of Physics.4, 71 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [69]

    Some Bianchi Type Cosmological Models in f(R) Gravity

    M. Farasat Shamir.Some Bianchi Type Cosmological Models in f(R) Gravity. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1006.4249

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1006.4249

  69. [70]

    https://doi.org/10.3390/ECU2021-09290

    Rishi Kumar Tiwari, Aroonkumar Beesham, Soma Mishra and Vipin Dubey.Bianchi Type I Cosmo- logical Model in f(R,T) Gravity. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECU2021-09290

    work page doi:10.3390/ecu2021-09290

  70. [71]

    Doi: 10.15381/rif.v25i1.21413

    Mississippi Valenzuela.Hamiltonian formalism of the Bianchi’s models. Doi: 10.15381/rif.v25i1.21413

    work page doi:10.15381/rif.v25i1.21413

  71. [72]

    S. K. Tripathy and B. Mishra.Anisotropic solutions in f(R) Gravity. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1601.05019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [73]

    A. H. Hasmani and Ahmed M. Al-Haysah.Exact Solutions for Bianchi Type- I Cosmological Models in f(R) Theory of Gravity. https://www.pvamu.edu/aam/wp- content/uploads/sites/182/2019/06/22 R1188 AAM Sah AA 080118 Posted 061019.pdf

    work page 2019

  73. [74]

    Sharif and M

    M. Sharif and M. Farasat Shamir, Class. and Quantum Grav.26,235020 (2009),Exact solutions of Bianchi type I and V spacetimes in the f(R) theory of gravity. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/23/235020

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/23/235020 2009

  74. [75]

    Sharif and M

    M. Sharif and M. Farasat Shamir, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.42, 2643 (2010).Non-vacuum Bianchi types I and V in f(R) gravity. doi:10.1007/s10714-010-1005-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-010-1005-5 2010

  75. [76]

    Will, book:Theory and experiment in gravitational physics, Cambridge University Press, (1993)

    Clifford M. Will, book:Theory and experiment in gravitational physics, Cambridge University Press, (1993)

    work page 1993

  76. [77]

    Berbena, Aar´ on V.B

    S.R. Berbena, Aar´ on V.B. Arellano, J. Socorro and L.O. Pimentel, Rev. Mex. F´ ıs. S53(2), 115 (2007), The Einstein-Hamilton-Jacobi equation: searching the classical solution for barotropic FRW

    work page 2007

  77. [78]

    Bhattacharjee and P.K

    D. Bhattacharjee and P.K. Chattopadhyay, [arXiv:2510.05246, [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv

  78. [79]

    Uddinn, J.E

    K. Uddinn, J.E. Lidsey and R. Tavakol. Class. Quant. Grav.24, 3951 (2007)

    work page 2007

  79. [80]

    Singh, M

    C.P. Singh, M. Zeyauddin and S. Ram. Int. J. of Theor. Phys.47, 3162 (2008)

    work page 2008