pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.11113 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-11 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

TeV Scale Quark-Lepton Unification

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 22:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords Pati-Salam modelleptoquark gauge bosonquark-lepton unificationZ2 symmetryflavor violationvector-like fermionsTeV scale
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a Pati-Salam model with softly broken Z2 symmetry, the leptoquark gauge boson Xμ can have a mass as low as 4.3 TeV while satisfying all flavor constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a quark-lepton unification model based on the Pati-Salam gauge group with an E6-inspired spectrum that features a leptoquark gauge boson Xμ at the multi-TeV scale. A softly broken Z2 symmetry restricts the couplings of Xμ so that tree-level flavor-violating processes are helicity suppressed, allowing Xμ masses down to 1.1 TeV in isolation. Gauge boson mass relations then impose a stronger bound of 4.3 TeV from LHC limits on the related Z' boson. This relatively low scale for the unification breaking makes the model testable through direct production of Xμ and associated vector-like quarks at current colliders, as well as through lepton flavor violation searches.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the combination of a Z2 parity that makes the leptoquark Xμ odd while keeping Standard Model fermions even, together with soft breaking that allows mixing only in the right-handed down sector, suppresses most dangerous flavor-violating effects to loop level and thereby permits the Pati-Salam breaking scale to sit near 4 TeV.

What carries the argument

The softly broken Z2 symmetry that assigns even parity to Standard Model fermions and odd parity to the new vector-like fermions and the Xμ gauge boson itself.

If this is right

  • Xμ masses starting from 4.3 TeV remain consistent with current data.
  • Vector-like down-type quarks with baryon number 2/3 become accessible at the LHC.
  • Lepton flavor violating decays such as μ → eγ can be induced at observable rates.
  • Neutrino masses are generated via dimension-seven tree-level operators and dimension-five one-loop diagrams.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model suggests targeted LHC searches for Xμ decaying to specific final states involving the vector-like quarks.
  • Similar symmetry structures might be applied to other leptoquark models to relax mass bounds.
  • Confirmation would support E6-inspired extensions of the Standard Model at accessible energies.

Load-bearing premise

The softly broken Z2 symmetry induces mixing exclusively in the right-handed down-quark sector while maintaining helicity suppression for all other tree-level Xμ-mediated processes.

What would settle it

A direct LHC observation of the Z' boson with mass below 4.3 TeV without a corresponding Xμ signal would challenge the mass relations assumed in the model.

read the original abstract

We propose a quark-lepton symmetric Pati-Salam (PS) model based on the gauge group $SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R \times SU(4)_C$ with an $E_6$-inspired particle spectrum which naturally accommodates a multi-TeV leptoquark gauge boson $X_\mu(3,1,\frac{2}{3})$. A softly broken $Z_2$ symmetry plays a crucial role in realizing this scenario, under which the Standard Model (SM) fermions are even, while new vector-like fermions present in the model are odd. A notable feature of this model is that the PS gauge boson $X_\mu$ itself is $Z_2$-odd, causing it to couple exclusively between SM fermions and the vector-like fermions, except in the right-handed down-quark sector, where mixing is induced by the soft breaking of $Z_2$. This structure leads to helicity suppression of tree-level meson decays mediated by $X_\mu$, with helicity-unsuppressed contributions arising only via one-loop diagrams. We show that $X_\mu$ can be as light as 1.1 TeV while being compatible with all flavor-violating constraints. However, mass relations among the $(W'^\pm_\mu, Z'_\mu, X_\mu)$ gauge bosons push the $X_\mu$ mass limit up to 4.3 TeV from the stringent LHC bounds on the $Z^\prime$ mass. This comparatively low PS-breaking scale opens up promising collider opportunities for probing the leptoquark gauge boson, as well as the distinctive signature of vector-like down-type quarks carrying an unusual baryon number of $2/3$. The model can be further tested via lepton flavor-violating processes induced by the leptoquark gauge boson, such as $\mu \to e \gamma$, $\mu \to e e e$, and $\mu$-$e$ conversion in nuclei. Neutrino masses arise in the model through dimension-seven operators at tree-level, as well as from dimension-five operators via one-loop diagrams.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Pati-Salam model on SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R × SU(4)_C with an E6-inspired spectrum and a softly broken Z2 symmetry under which SM fermions are even and vector-like fermions (plus the X_μ gauge boson) are odd. Soft Z2 breaking is arranged to induce mixing only in the right-handed down-quark sector, producing helicity suppression for tree-level FCNCs mediated by the Z2-odd leptoquark X_μ(3,1,2/3). This permits X_μ masses as low as 1.1 TeV from flavor constraints, while mass relations among (W'±, Z', X) raise the bound to 4.3 TeV from LHC Z' limits. Neutrino masses are generated via dimension-seven tree-level operators and dimension-five one-loop diagrams; distinctive signatures include vector-like down quarks with baryon number 2/3 and LFV processes such as μ → eγ.

Significance. If the Z2 construction and selective mixing can be shown to be consistent with the full E6 spectrum and gauge-boson mass matrix, the work would provide a concrete, testable realization of TeV-scale quark-lepton unification with collider-accessible signatures and falsifiable LFV predictions. The use of a Z2-odd X_μ to enforce helicity suppression is a technically interesting mechanism that avoids ad-hoc parameter tuning.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model construction and Z2 symmetry section] The central assumption that soft Z2 breaking induces mixing exclusively in the right-handed down-quark sector, while preserving helicity suppression for all other tree-level X_μ-mediated processes and remaining consistent with the E6-inspired vector-like fermion quantum numbers under SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R × SU(4)_C, is asserted in the abstract but not demonstrated via explicit mass matrices or VEV assignments. The PS-breaking VEVs that generate the (W', Z', X) mass relations must be shown to permit exactly this pattern without reintroducing unsuppressed operators.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and results section] The numerical claims of 1.1 TeV and 4.3 TeV rest on unspecified loop calculations and mass relations; these should be presented with explicit equations and parameter values in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment and for identifying the need for greater explicitness in the Z2 implementation. We will revise the manuscript to include the requested mass matrices and VEV analysis, which strengthens the presentation without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Model construction and Z2 symmetry section] The central assumption that soft Z2 breaking induces mixing exclusively in the right-handed down-quark sector, while preserving helicity suppression for all other tree-level X_μ-mediated processes and remaining consistent with the E6-inspired vector-like fermion quantum numbers under SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R × SU(4)_C, is asserted in the abstract but not demonstrated via explicit mass matrices or VEV assignments. The PS-breaking VEVs that generate the (W', Z', X) mass relations must be shown to permit exactly this pattern without reintroducing unsuppressed operators.

    Authors: We agree that explicit demonstration is required for rigor. In the revised version we will add a new subsection containing the complete 3×3 (and 6×6 where relevant) fermion mass matrices after soft Z2 breaking. These matrices will be derived from the allowed Yukawa terms and the specific VEV pattern of the E6-inspired scalars, showing that mixing appears only in the right-handed down sector while all other SM–vector-like couplings remain off-diagonal and helicity-suppressed. We will also display the full gauge-boson mass matrix generated by the PS-breaking VEVs, confirming that the (W', Z', X) mass relations are preserved and that no dimension-4 operators violating the helicity suppression are generated. This construction is fully consistent with the E6 quantum numbers under the PS group. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model assumptions explicit, mass limits from gauge relations plus external LHC bounds

full rationale

The derivation relies on standard Pati-Salam gauge boson mass matrices generated by explicit PS-breaking VEVs and an input softly broken Z2 symmetry that controls fermion mixings by construction. The 1.1 TeV flavor bound and its upward revision to 4.3 TeV follow directly from those mass relations combined with external LHC Z' limits; no parameter is fitted to the target X_μ mass inside the paper's equations, and no self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is used to justify the central claims. The construction is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on standard gauge unification assumptions plus the introduction of new vector-like fermions and a soft Z2 breaking term whose scale is not fixed by first principles.

free parameters (1)
  • soft Z2 breaking parameters
    These control the mixing in the right-handed down sector and are chosen to satisfy flavor constraints while preserving the overall suppression pattern.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The gauge group is SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R × SU(4)_C with an E6-inspired fermion spectrum
    Invoked to define the particle content and the origin of the leptoquark X_mu.
invented entities (1)
  • Z2-odd vector-like fermions no independent evidence
    purpose: To make X_mu odd under Z2 and enforce the desired coupling structure
    New particles introduced to realize the symmetry assignment; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5696 in / 1552 out tokens · 50238 ms · 2026-05-16T22:38:43.634846+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Is Baryon Number Conserved?,

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam, “Is Baryon Number Conserved?,”Phys. Rev. Lett.31(1973) 661–664

  2. [2]

    Lepton Number as the Fourth Color,

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam, “Lepton Number as the Fourth Color,”Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 275–289. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 11, 703–703 (1975)]

  3. [3]

    Vector Leptoquarks Could Be Rather Light?

    A. V. Kuznetsov and N. V. Mikheev, “Vector leptoquarks could be rather light?,”Phys. Lett. B 329(1994) 295–299,arXiv:hep-ph/9406347

  4. [4]

    Quark-Lepton Unification and Rare Meson Decays

    G. Valencia and S. Willenbrock, “Quark - lepton unification and rare meson decays,”Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6843–6848,arXiv:hep-ph/9409201

  5. [5]

    Mass limits for scalar and gauge leptoquarks from $ K_L^0 \to e^{\mp} \mu^{\pm}, B^0 \to e^{\mp} \tau^{\pm} $ decays

    A. D. Smirnov, “Mass limits for scalar and gauge leptoquarks from K(L)0 —>e-+ mu+-, B0 —> e-+ tau+- decays,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A22(2007) 2353–2363,arXiv:0705.0308 [hep-ph]

  6. [6]

    A Universal Gauge Theory Model Based on E6,

    F. Gursey, P. Ramond, and P. Sikivie, “A Universal Gauge Theory Model Based on E6,”Phys. Lett. B60(1976) 177–180

  7. [7]

    Could Vector Leptoquarks be Rather Light?

    A. V. Kuznetsov and N. V. Mikheev, “Could vector leptoquarks be rather light?,” in8th International Seminar on High-energy Physics. 5, 1994.arXiv:hep-ph/9409321. – 61 –

  8. [8]

    Prospects for mass unification at low energy scales

    R. R. Volkas, “Prospects for mass unification at low-energy scales,”Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 2681–2698,arXiv:hep-ph/9507215

  9. [9]

    An alternative SU(4) x SU(2)L x SU(2)R model

    R. Foot, “An Alternative SU(4) x SU(2)L x SU(2)R model,”Phys. Lett. B420(1998) 333–339, arXiv:hep-ph/9708205

  10. [10]

    Implications of TeV scale SU(4)xSU(2)_LxSU(2)_R quark-lepton unification

    R. Foot and G. Filewood, “Implications of TeV scale SU(4) x SU(2)-L x SU(2)-R quark lepton-lepton unification,”Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 115002,arXiv:hep-ph/9903374

  11. [11]

    Lowering the scale of Pati-Salam breaking through seesaw mixing,

    M. J. Dolan, T. P. Dutka, and R. R. Volkas, “Lowering the scale of Pati-Salam breaking through seesaw mixing,”JHEP05(2021) 199,arXiv:2012.05976 [hep-ph]

  12. [12]

    Search for high-mass resonances at FCC-hh,

    C. Helsens and M. Selvaggi, “Search for high-mass resonances at FCC-hh,” tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 2018.https://cds.cern.ch/record/2642473

  13. [13]

    New Mechanism for Neutrino Mass Generation and Triply Charged Higgs Bosons at the LHC

    K. S. Babu, S. Nandi, and Z. Tavartkiladze, “New Mechanism for Neutrino Mass Generation and Triply Charged Higgs Bosons at the LHC,”Phys. Rev.D80(2009) 071702,arXiv:0905.2710 [hep-ph]

  14. [14]

    Generation of Neutrino mass from new physics at TeV scale and Multi-lepton Signatures at the LHC

    G. Bambhaniya, J. Chakrabortty, S. Goswami, and P. Konar, “Generation of neutrino mass from new physics at TeV scale and multilepton signatures at the LHC,”Phys. Rev. D88no. 7, (2013) 075006,arXiv:1305.2795 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    Verifiable Radiative Seesaw Mechanism of Neutrino Mass and Dark Matter

    E. Ma, “Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D 73(2006) 077301,arXiv:hep-ph/0601225

  16. [16]

    Radiative Seesaw Mechanism at Weak Scale

    Z.-j. Tao, “Radiative seesaw mechanism at weak scale,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 5693–5697, arXiv:hep-ph/9603309

  17. [17]

    Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles,

    J. Preskill, “Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles,”Phys. Rev. Lett.43 (1979) 1365

  18. [18]

    Inflation and Monopoles in Supersymmetric SU(4)_c x SU(2)_L x SU(2)_R

    R. Jeannerot, S. Khalil, G. Lazarides, and Q. Shafi, “Inflation and monopoles in supersymmetric SU(4)C x SU(2)(L) x SU(2)(R),”JHEP10(2000) 012,arXiv:hep-ph/0002151

  19. [19]

    B-decay anomalies in Pati-Salam SU(4)

    R. Barbieri and A. Tesi, “B-decay anomalies in Pati-Salam SU(4),”Eur. Phys. J. C78no. 3, (2018) 193,arXiv:1712.06844 [hep-ph]

  20. [20]

    $B$ Meson Anomalies in a Pati-Salam Model within the Randall-Sundrum Background

    M. Blanke and A. Crivellin, “BMeson Anomalies in a Pati-Salam Model within the Randall-Sundrum Background,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 1, (2018) 011801,arXiv:1801.07256 [hep-ph]

  21. [21]

    Pati-Salam explanations of the B-meson anomalies

    J. Heeck and D. Teresi, “Pati-Salam explanations of the B-meson anomalies,”JHEP12(2018) 103,arXiv:1808.07492 [hep-ph]

  22. [22]

    Flavor non-universal Pati-Salam unification and neutrino masses,

    J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, J. Pag` es, and B. A. Stefanek, “Flavor non-universal Pati-Salam unification and neutrino masses,”Phys. Lett. B820(2021) 136484,arXiv:2012.10492 [hep-ph]

  23. [23]

    Searching for realistic 4d string models with a Pati-Salam symmetry -- Orbifold grand unified theories from heterotic string compactification on a Z6 orbifold

    T. Kobayashi, S. Raby, and R.-J. Zhang, “Searching for realistic 4d string models with a Pati-Salam symmetry: Orbifold grand unified theories from heterotic string compactification on a Z(6) orbifold,”Nucl. Phys. B704(2005) 3–55,arXiv:hep-ph/0409098

  24. [24]

    Supersymmetric Pati-Salam Models from Intersecting D6-branes: A Road to the Standard Model

    M. Cvetic, T. Li, and T. Liu, “Supersymmetric Pati-Salam models from intersecting D6-branes: A Road to the standard model,”Nucl. Phys. B698(2004) 163–201,arXiv:hep-th/0403061

  25. [25]

    Classification of Heterotic Pati-Salam Models

    B. Assel, K. Christodoulides, A. E. Faraggi, C. Kounnas, and J. Rizos, “Classification of Heterotic Pati-Salam Models,”Nucl. Phys. B844(2011) 365–396,arXiv:1007.2268 [hep-th]

  26. [26]

    Beyond the Spectral Standard Model: Emergence of Pati-Salam Unification

    A. H. Chamseddine, A. Connes, and W. D. van Suijlekom, “Beyond the Spectral Standard Model: Emergence of Pati-Salam Unification,”JHEP11(2013) 132,arXiv:1304.8050 [hep-th]. – 62 –

  27. [27]

    Low-Energy Phenomenology of Superstring Inspired E(6) Models,

    J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo, “Low-Energy Phenomenology of Superstring Inspired E(6) Models,”Phys. Rept.183(1989) 193

  28. [28]

    Local B-L Symmetry of Electroweak Interactions, Majorana Neutrinos and Neutron Oscillations,

    R. N. Mohapatra and R. Marshak, “Local B-L Symmetry of Electroweak Interactions, Majorana Neutrinos and Neutron Oscillations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980) 1316–1319. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 44, 1643 (1980)]

  29. [29]

    SO(10) a la Pati-Salam

    C. S. Aulakh and A. Girdhar, “SO(10) a la Pati-Salam,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20(2005) 865–894, arXiv:hep-ph/0204097

  30. [30]

    The Hierarchy Problem and New Dimensions at a Millimeter

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali, “The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter,”Phys. Lett. B429(1998) 263–272,arXiv:hep-ph/9803315

  31. [31]

    The Interplay Between GUT and Flavour Symmetries in a Pati-Salam x S4 Model

    R. de Adelhart Toorop, F. Bazzocchi, and L. Merlo, “The Interplay Between GUT and Flavour Symmetries in a Pati-Salam x S4 Model,”JHEP08(2010) 001,arXiv:1003.4502 [hep-ph]

  32. [32]

    A to Z of Flavour with Pati-Salam

    S. F. King, “A to Z of Flavour with Pati-Salam,”JHEP08(2014) 130,arXiv:1406.7005 [hep-ph]

  33. [33]

    Fermion Masses and Mixings, Leptogenesis and Baryon Number Violation in Pati-Salam Model

    S. Saad, “Fermion Masses and Mixings, Leptogenesis and Baryon Number Violation in Pati-Salam Model,”Nucl. Phys. B943(2019) 114630,arXiv:1712.04880 [hep-ph]

  34. [34]

    Particle Dichotomy and Left-Right Decomposition of E(6) Superstring Models,

    E. Ma, “Particle Dichotomy and Left-Right Decomposition of E(6) Superstring Models,”Phys. Rev. D36(1987) 274

  35. [35]

    New Supersymmetric Left-Right Gauge Model: Higgs Boson Structure and Neutral Current Analysis,

    K. S. Babu, X.-G. He, and E. Ma, “New Supersymmetric Left-Right Gauge Model: Higgs Boson Structure and Neutral Current Analysis,”Phys. Rev. D36(1987) 878

  36. [36]

    Perturbative unitarity constraints on generic Yukawa interactions,

    L. Allwicher, P. Arnan, D. Barducci, and M. Nardecchia, “Perturbative unitarity constraints on generic Yukawa interactions,”JHEP10(2021) 129,arXiv:2108.00013 [hep-ph]

  37. [37]

    Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, “Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980) 912

  38. [38]

    The seesaw mechanism at arbitrary order: disentangling the small scale from the large scale

    W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, “The Seesaw mechanism at arbitrary order: Disentangling the small scale from the large scale,”JHEP11(2000) 042,arXiv:hep-ph/0008179

  39. [39]

    Inverses of 2×2 block matrices,

    T.-T. Lu and S.-H. Shiou, “Inverses of 2×2 block matrices,”Computers & Mathematics with Applications43no. 1-2, (2002) 119–129

  40. [40]

    Suggested new modes in supersymmetric proton decay

    K. S. Babu, J. C. Pati, and F. Wilczek, “Suggested new modes in supersymmetric proton decay,” Phys. Lett. B423(1998) 337–347,arXiv:hep-ph/9712307

  41. [41]

    FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology

    A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, “FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,”Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2250–2300, arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph]

  42. [42]

    UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output

    C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, and T. Reiter, “UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output,”Comput. Phys. Commun.183(2012) 1201–1214,arXiv:1108.2040 [hep-ph]

  43. [43]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,”JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]. [44]ATLASCollaboration, G. Aadet al., “Sea...

  44. [44]

    Searching for New Heavy Vector Bosons inp¯p Colliders,

    G. Altarelli, B. Mele, and M. Ruiz-Altaba, “Searching for New Heavy Vector Bosons inp¯p Colliders,”Z. Phys. C45(1989) 109. [Erratum: Z.Phys.C 47, 676 (1990)]. [46]ATLASCollaboration, “Prospects for searches for heavyZ ′ andW ′ bosons in fermionic final states with the ATLAS experiment at the HL-LHC,”. [47]ATLASCollaboration, G. Aadet al., “Search for vect...

  45. [45]

    Long Distance Contribution to $K_L \to \ell^+ \ell^-$

    G. Valencia, “Long distance contribution to K(L) —>lepton+ lepton-,”Nucl. Phys. B517 (1998) 339–352,arXiv:hep-ph/9711377

  46. [46]

    Long-distance contributions to the K_L --> mu+ mu- decay width

    D. Gomez Dumm and A. Pich, “Long distance contributions to the K(L) —>mu+ mu- decay width,”Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 4633–4636,arXiv:hep-ph/9801298. [53]E871Collaboration, D. Ambroseet al., “Improved branching ratio measurement for the decay K0(L) –>mu+ mu-,”Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 1389–1392. [54]BNLCollaboration, D. Ambroseet al., “New limit on muon and ...

  47. [47]

    Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced Tau+Tau- Pairs

    K. Hayasakaet al., “Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced Tau+Tau- Pairs,”Phys. Lett. B687(2010) 139–143,arXiv:1001.3221 [hep-ex]

  48. [48]

    Weak Hamiltonian, CP Violation and Rare Decays

    A. J. Buras, “Weak Hamiltonian, CP violation and rare decays,” inLes Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics, Session 68: Probing the Standard Model of Particle Interactions, pp. 281–539. 6, 1998.arXiv:hep-ph/9806471

  49. [49]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995

  50. [50]

    ∆M s theory precision confronts flavour anomalies,

    L. Di Luzio, M. Kirk, A. Lenz, and T. Rauh, “∆M s theory precision confronts flavour anomalies,” JHEP12(2019) 009,arXiv:1909.11087 [hep-ph]. [70]UTfitCollaboration, M. Bonaet al., “Model-independent constraints on ∆F= 2 operators and the scale of new physics,”JHEP03(2008) 049,arXiv:0707.0636 [hep-ph]

  51. [51]

    Flavor Physics in the Randall-Sundrum Model: II. Tree-Level Weak-Interaction Processes

    M. Bauer, S. Casagrande, U. Haisch, and M. Neubert, “Flavor Physics in the Randall-Sundrum Model: II. Tree-Level Weak-Interaction Processes,”JHEP09(2010) 017,arXiv:0912.1625 [hep-ph]

  52. [52]

    Flavor physics constraints on left-right symmetric models with universal seesaw,

    R. Dcruz, “Flavor physics constraints on left-right symmetric models with universal seesaw,” Nucl. Phys. B1001(2024) 116519,arXiv:2301.10786 [hep-ph]

  53. [53]

    Delta M_K and epsilon_K in SUSY at the Next-to-Leading order

    M. Ciuchiniet al., “Delta M(K) and epsilon(K) in SUSY at the next-to-leading order,”JHEP10 (1998) 008,arXiv:hep-ph/9808328

  54. [54]

    Suppression of Higgs Strangeness Changing Neutral Currents in a Class of Gauge Theories,

    G. Senjanovic and P. Senjanovic, “Suppression of Higgs Strangeness Changing Neutral Currents in a Class of Gauge Theories,”Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 3253

  55. [55]

    Strangeness Changing Processes and the Limit on the Right-handed Gauge Boson Mass,

    R. N. Mohapatra, G. Senjanovic, and M. D. Tran, “Strangeness Changing Processes and the Limit on the Right-handed Gauge Boson Mass,”Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 546

  56. [56]

    General CP Violation in Minimal Left-Right Symmetric Model and Constraints on the Right-Handed Scale

    Y. Zhang, H. An, X. Ji, and R. N. Mohapatra, “General CP Violation in Minimal Left-Right Symmetric Model and Constraints on the Right-Handed Scale,”Nucl. Phys. B802(2008) 247–279,arXiv:0712.4218 [hep-ph]

  57. [57]

    The Processesµ→e+γ, µ→e+ e, ν′ →ν+γin the Weinberg-Salam Model with Neutrino Mixing,

    S. T. Petcov, “The Processesµ→e+γ, µ→e+ e, ν′ →ν+γin the Weinberg-Salam Model with Neutrino Mixing,”Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.25(1977) 340. [Erratum: Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 25, 698 (1977), Erratum: Yad.Fiz. 25, 1336 (1977)]

  58. [58]

    New limit on theµ + →e +γdecay with the meg ii experiment,

    MEG II Collaboration, “New limit on theµ + →e +γdecay with the meg ii experiment,”Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 10, (2025) 1177,arXiv:2504.15711 [hep-ex]

  59. [59]

    T. P. Cheng and L. F. Li,Gauge theory of elementary particle physics: Problems and solutions. 2000. – 65 –

  60. [60]

    General formulae for f1 --> f2 gamma

    L. Lavoura, “General formulae for f(1) —>f(2) gamma,”Eur. Phys. J. C29(2003) 191–195, arXiv:hep-ph/0302221

  61. [61]

    Unitarity of the Leptonic Mixing Matrix

    S. Antusch, C. Biggio, E. Fernandez-Martinez, M. B. Gavela, and J. Lopez-Pavon, “Unitarity of the Leptonic Mixing Matrix,”JHEP10(2006) 084,arXiv:hep-ph/0607020

  62. [62]

    Low energy effects of neutrino masses

    A. Abada, C. Biggio, F. Bonnet, M. B. Gavela, and T. Hambye, “Low energy effects of neutrino masses,”JHEP12(2007) 061,arXiv:0707.4058 [hep-ph]

  63. [63]

    Muon Decay and Physics Beyond the Standard Model

    Y. Kuno and Y. Okada, “Muon decay and physics beyond the standard model,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 73(2001) 151–202,arXiv:hep-ph/9909265

  64. [64]

    Generic one-loop matching conditions for rare meson decays,

    F. Bishara, J. Brod, M. Gorbahn, and U. Moldanazarova, “Generic one-loop matching conditions for rare meson decays,”JHEP07(2021) 230,arXiv:2104.10930 [hep-ph]

  65. [65]

    TheZPenguin in Generic Extensions of the Standard Model,

    J. Brod and M. Gorbahn, “TheZPenguin in Generic Extensions of the Standard Model,”JHEP 09(2019) 027,arXiv:1903.05116 [hep-ph]

  66. [66]

    Weak Decays Beyond Leading Logarithms

    G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, “Weak Decays beyond Leading Logarithms,” Rev. Mod. Phys.68(1996) 1125–1144,arXiv:hep-ph/9512380

  67. [67]

    Coherent muon-electron conversion in muonic atoms

    A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano, and K. Melnikov, “Coherent muon electron conversion in muonic atoms,”AIP Conf. Proc.435no. 1, (1998) 409–418,arXiv:hep-ph/9801218

  68. [68]

    Detailed calculation of lepton flavor violating muon-electron conversion rate for various nuclei

    R. Kitano, M. Koike, and Y. Okada, “Detailed calculation of lepton flavor violating muon electron conversion rate for various nuclei,”Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 096002,arXiv:hep-ph/0203110. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 76, 059902 (2007)]. [89]SINDRUM IICollaboration, W. H. Bertlet al., “A Search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold,”Eur. Phys. J. C47(2006) 33...

  69. [69]

    Search for Muon - Electron and Muon - Positron Conversion,

    S. Ahmadet al., “Search for Muon - Electron and Muon - Positron Conversion,”Phys. Rev. D38 (1988) 2102

  70. [70]

    Renormalization group study of the standard model and its extensions. 1. The Standard model,

    H. Arason, D. J. Castano, B. Keszthelyi, S. Mikaelian, E. J. Piard, P. Ramond, and B. D. Wright, “Renormalization group study of the standard model and its extensions. 1. The Standard model,” Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 3945–3965

  71. [71]

    B_d-Bbar_d Mixing and the B_d -> J/psi K_s Asymmetry in General SUSY Models

    D. Becirevic, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, V. Gimenez, G. Martinelli, A. Masiero, M. Papinutto, J. Reyes, and L. Silvestrini, “B d − ¯Bd mixing and theB d →J/ψK s asymmetry in general SUSY models,”Nucl. Phys. B634(2002) 105–119,arXiv:hep-ph/0112303

  72. [72]

    Total Nuclear Capture Rates for Negative Muons,

    T. Suzuki, D. F. Measday, and J. P. Roalsvig, “Total Nuclear Capture Rates for Negative Muons,”Phys. Rev. C35(1987) 2212. – 66 –