pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1405.0301 · v2 · submitted 2014-05-01 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 1 theorem link

The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 12:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords automated cross-section computationnext-to-leading orderparton-shower matchingtree-level calculationssample mergingcollider phenomenologyrenormalisable Lagrangiansdifferential distributions
0
0 comments X

The pith

A unified framework automates tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections along with parton-shower matching and sample merging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to establish that the full chain of collider phenomenology computations, from fixed-order perturbative results at tree level and next-to-leading order through matching to parton showers and merging of different multiplicity samples, can be performed inside one program. Human input is restricted to the choice of physical process and parameters while the code handles matrix-element generation, integration, matching, and merging. A reader would care because this removes the need for repeated manual technical work when studying processes at the LHC or a future electron-positron collider, allowing faster and more systematic exploration of predictions. The approach begins with QCD corrections to standard-model processes but is designed so that the user sees no interface change when other renormalisable interactions are added.

Core claim

A computer program handles parton-level fixed-order calculations, shower-matched results, and merged samples in a single framework whose defining features are flexibility, high parallelisation, and limitation of human intervention to input physics quantities. While next-to-leading order results are at first restricted to QCD corrections for standard-model processes, the user viewpoint requires no changes for corrections arising from any given renormalisable Lagrangian, and the implementation of those extensions is already under way.

What carries the argument

The unified automation framework that generates matrix elements, performs phase-space integration, applies parton-shower matching, and merges samples of differing light-parton multiplicity.

If this is right

  • Differential cross sections at next-to-leading order can be obtained and matched to parton showers for arbitrary processes with only physics input from the user.
  • Samples with different light-parton multiplicities can be merged consistently within the same run.
  • The identical workflow applies once non-QCD corrections from any renormalisable Lagrangian are incorporated.
  • Large-scale parallel execution becomes available for collider phenomenology studies without additional user coding.
  • Fixed-order, matched, and merged results are produced under one consistent interface.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same automation pattern could be extended to higher perturbative orders or to electroweak corrections once those modules are completed.
  • Experimental groups might incorporate the framework directly into analysis chains to generate theory predictions on demand.
  • Model builders could test new renormalisable interactions against collider data with far less computational overhead than before.
  • The reduction in manual setup time would allow more rapid iteration between theoretical proposals and numerical comparisons with data.

Load-bearing premise

Automation for any given renormalisable Lagrangian can be achieved without requiring the user to alter the program or its interface.

What would settle it

An explicit next-to-leading-order calculation for a chosen standard-model process that the program produces and that differs from an independent analytic or numerical result by more than the expected perturbative uncertainty.

read the original abstract

We discuss the theoretical bases that underpin the automation of the computations of tree-level and next-to-leading order cross sections, of their matching to parton shower simulations, and of the merging of matched samples that differ by light-parton multiplicities. We present a computer program, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, capable of handling all these computations -- parton-level fixed order, shower-matched, merged -- in a unified framework whose defining features are flexibility, high level of parallelisation, and human intervention limited to input physics quantities. We demonstrate the potential of the program by presenting selected phenomenological applications relevant to the LHC and to a 1-TeV $e^+e^-$ collider. While next-to-leading order results are restricted to QCD corrections to SM processes in the first public version, we show that from the user viewpoint no changes have to be expected in the case of corrections due to any given renormalisable Lagrangian, and that the implementation of these are well under way.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO computer program for the automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order (NLO) differential cross sections, their matching to parton shower simulations, and the merging of matched samples that differ by light-parton multiplicities. It discusses the theoretical bases for these computations and demonstrates the program's capabilities through selected phenomenological applications relevant to the LHC and a 1-TeV e+e- collider. The framework is designed to be flexible and highly parallelized, with human intervention limited to input physics quantities. While the first public version restricts NLO results to QCD corrections for Standard Model processes, the design ensures that extensions to corrections from any renormalizable Lagrangian require no changes from the user perspective, with such implementations noted as being under development.

Significance. This work holds significant value for the field of high-energy physics phenomenology by providing a unified, automated framework that integrates fixed-order calculations, parton-shower matching, and merging techniques. The modular separation between model input in UFO format and the computation engines (such as FKS subtraction for NLO) supports the claim of broad applicability with minimal user effort. By demonstrating applications on LHC and e+e- examples, the paper illustrates practical utility for collider physics. The high level of parallelization and automation of established methods like MC@NLO matching and MLM-style merging enhances efficiency in generating predictions for complex processes. If the implementation details in the full manuscript validate the claims, this tool would substantially lower the barrier for performing state-of-the-art calculations.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'the implementation of these are well under way' for non-QCD corrections could be clarified with a timeline or specific status to better inform readers about the current capabilities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation to accept it for publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in implementation description

full rationale

The paper describes the design and capabilities of the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO program for automating tree-level, NLO QCD, MC@NLO matching, and MLM merging computations. Its central claims concern software architecture (UFO model input, FKS subtraction, modular separation of physics input from computation engine) and are supported by explicit code structure and example applications rather than any derivation chain. No equations, predictions, or uniqueness theorems are presented that reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation load-bearing steps. The statement that extensions to arbitrary renormalisable Lagrangians require no user changes is framed as a realised design property, not a derived result. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks of established methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard perturbative QCD techniques and collider simulation methods already present in the literature; no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption QCD corrections to Standard Model processes can be computed via known automated techniques
    Invoked when stating that the program handles NLO computations for SM processes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5519 in / 1235 out tokens · 53373 ms · 2026-05-11T12:46:45.212447+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 60 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Search for single vector-like quark production in opposite-sign dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 8.0

    No excess observed in search for vector-like top quark T to tH in opposite-sign dilepton final states; 95% CL upper limits on sigma times BR range from 2.0 pb at 600 GeV to 0.1 pb at 1000 GeV.

  2. Generative models on phase space

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Generative diffusion and flow models are constructed to remain exactly on the Lorentz-invariant massless N-particle phase space manifold during sampling for particle physics applications.

  3. Logarithmically-accurate showers with massive quarks

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PanScales final-state showers now include quark masses at NLL accuracy while keeping original accuracy for massless observables.

  4. Collider-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents with Particle Physics Analysis Reproduction

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Collider-Bench is a new benchmark showing that current LLM agents cannot reliably reproduce LHC analyses at the level of a physicist-in-the-loop.

  5. Probing Boosted Light Scalars in the Type-I 2HDM

    hep-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Boosted light scalars decaying to b b-bar in Type-I 2HDM can be tagged as double-b fat-jets and used with SM gauge bosons to probe heavy scalars up to 540 GeV at the HL-LHC for masses 30-70 GeV.

  6. Decaying spin-3/2 dark matter from baryon number violation

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-supersymmetric spin-3/2 dark matter with baryon-violating portals can explain the relic abundance through UV and Boltzmann-suppressed freeze-in, with viable parameter space constrained by indirect detection, direc...

  7. Differential measurements of $\gamma\gamma\to\tau\tau$ and constraints on $\tau$-lepton electromagnetic moments in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with ATLAS

    nucl-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First differential cross-sections for γγ→ττ in Pb+Pb collisions yield 95% CL intervals -0.057 < a_τ < 0.035 and |d_τ| < 2.7×10^{-16} e cm.

  8. Search for Long-Lived Dark Photons from Dark Radiation at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dark radiation from dark matter produced in Z decays generates long-lived dark photons that dominate over meson decays and bremsstrahlung for small kinetic mixing and masses above the GeV scale, allowing FASER2, FACET...

  9. Cascade Pipeline for Leading-Order Matrix Element Evaluation on AMD Versal AI Engine Arrays

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A cascade pipeline architecture on AMD Versal AI Engine tiles projects 1 million matrix element evaluations per second at 54.8 W for gg→ttg, delivering 34× CPU speedup and 7.7× better energy efficiency with parts-per-...

  10. Big Dipper, Help Me Find A Way -- Dip-hunting at hadron colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Parametric neural networks learn likelihood ratios to infer top-philic scalar resonances from dip patterns caused by signal-background interference in hadron collider data.

  11. Evidence of ZZ$\gamma$ production and observation of $4\ell\gamma$ in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    First evidence for ZZ gamma production at 3.7 sigma and observation of 4 lepton gamma at 5.0 sigma in CMS data at 13 TeV, with measured fiducial cross sections consistent with predictions.

  12. Many Wrongs Make a Right: Leveraging Biased Simulations Towards Unbiased Parameter Inference

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Template-Adapted Mixture Model uses many biased simulations for data-driven estimates of signal and background distributions, yielding unbiased signal fraction estimates with well-calibrated uncertainties.

  13. Probing compressed triplet scalars with ISR jets and soft leptons at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A cut-and-count analysis exploiting ISR jets and soft leptons can reach discovery sensitivity for compressed triplet scalars with 1-30 GeV splittings at 3000 fb^{-1}.

  14. NLO QCD and parton-shower effects for Higgs-boson production in association with a hard photon via vector-boson fusion

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NLO QCD plus parton-shower matched implementation for VBF Higgs plus photon production, with studies showing small shower effects on Higgs observables and larger effects on sub-leading jets.

  15. SMEFT everywhere: a NLO study of $\boldsymbol{pp \to t\bar{t}H}$ with decaying tops

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NLO QCD corrections to pp to ttbar H in the di-lepton channel with SMEFT operators included in both production and top-quark decays.

  16. Composite top partners in exotic colour representations

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Colour-sextet top partners in composite Higgs models are excluded up to 2-2.5 TeV by current LHC data via top-rich decays, with HL-LHC reach near 3 TeV.

  17. Bounds on massive graviton-like particles from searches for axion-like particles coupling to photons

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Limits on axion-like particles from photon-coupling searches are recast as constraints on massive graviton-like particles across lab, astrophysical, and cosmological experiments using analogous Primakoff and Gertsensh...

  18. How Invisible: Regressing The Key Model Parameter for Semi-visible Jet Searches

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A regression model reconstructs the key parameter r_inv for semi-visible jets at higher precision than prior analytical methods and may unify s- and t-channel production searches.

  19. Low-Multiplicity Jets as Probes of GeV-Scale Light-Quark-Coupled Particles

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A proposed LHC search using low-multiplicity jets plus a photon can extend sensitivity to GeV-scale particles that couple to light quarks.

  20. Tree Amplitudes with Charged Matter in Pure Gauge Theory

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new Mathematica package computes tree amplitudes with arbitrary gauge bosons and arbitrarily charged massless fermions by reducing distinct-flavor partial amplitudes to linear combinations of single-flavor supersymm...

  21. Radiation effects on the entanglement of fermion pairs at colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Energetic radiation induces decoherence that significantly reduces entanglement in fermion pairs at colliders, with statistically significant signals observable in ttbar(g) at the LHC and tau pairs at Belle II.

  22. Operator Identification in Charged Lepton-Flavor Violation: Global EFT Analysis with RG Evolution, Polarization Observables, and Bayesian Model Discrimination at Future Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Global EFT analysis of charged lepton-flavor violation at future colliders incorporates RG running, polarization, and Bayesian discrimination to identify operators, finding 10-30% shifts from tree-level mappings at mu...

  23. SemiCharmTag: a tool for Semileptonic Charm tagging

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SemiCharmTag achieves a factor of ~4 signal-over-background improvement at 81% efficiency for Drell-Yan muons using secondary-vertex hadron tagging in LHCb proton-proton collision simulations.

  24. Probing Higgs and Top Interactions through the Muon Lens at multi-TeV Muon Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A 10 TeV muon collider could improve existing bounds on muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top interactions by up to an order of magnitude over current limits and FCC-ee projections.

  25. A Determination of the Top Mass from a Global PDF Analysis

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The top-quark pole mass is determined to be 172.80 ± 0.26 GeV from a global NNPDF analysis at approximate N³LO QCD including NLO QED, EW, and toponium corrections.

  26. Heavy Vector Triplets at a Muon Collider

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Muon colliders can probe heavy vector triplets up to 12 TeV, competitive with HE-LHC but below FCC-hh projections, including indirect electroweak precision limits.

  27. Dark photon searches in the photon channel

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GEANT4 simulations indicate that photon spectral shape differences from pion decays in a tungsten foil setup could probe new dark photon parameter space with feasible proton beam runs.

  28. Search for pair production of additional neutral scalars within the Inert Doublet Model in a final state with two electrons or two muons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV and 13.6 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    No significant excess found; new exclusion limits reach m_H = 108 GeV for m_H - m_A = 78 GeV in the Inert Doublet Model.

  29. Time-dependent signals of new physics at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Incorporating timing information from time-dependent new physics signals can improve LHC search sensitivity by up to a factor of two compared to standard time-invariant analyses.

  30. Electroweak Restoration: SMEFT and HEFT

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High-energy amplitude ratios for longitudinal di-boson production approach unity in the SM and dimension-6 SMEFT but not necessarily in HEFT, making the W±_L Z_L to W±_L h cross section ratio a promising discriminator...

  31. Cascade Pipeline for Leading-Order Matrix Element Evaluation on AMD Versal AI Engine Arrays

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A cascade pipeline on 400 AIE tiles evaluates gg→ttg leading-order matrix elements at 1 million per second with parts-per-million accuracy to MadGraph, delivering 34× CPU speedup and 7.7× better energy efficiency at 54.8 W.

  32. New insights into the $b\rightarrow c \bar{u}q$ puzzle through Top-Bottom synergies

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Anomalies in b to c u-bar q transitions remain puzzling as proposed new physics scenarios involving SU(2) doublets are not significantly relaxed by collider dilution or factorization breakdown.

  33. Can LLP detectors probe the reheating temperature? A case study of vector dark matter

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In a vector dark matter extension of the Higgs portal, far detectors at colliders can probe otherwise inaccessible parameter space and set novel bounds on the reheating temperature.

  34. Kitchen Sink Anomaly Detection

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A combined kitchen sink observable set of Energy Flow Polynomials and subjettiness variables outperforms standard baselines in sensitivity to a wide range of resonant signals, with new public benchmarks released and a...

  35. The KM3NeT event: a primordial high energy neutrino?

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The KM3NeT neutrino event may be a primordial neutrino from relic particle decay or annihilation near recombination, yielding a narrow spectral peak that evades broad power-law constraints from other telescopes.

  36. New Physics Reach through Precision at Future Colliders: a Multi-Pronged Approach

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Future e+e- colliders can constrain new physics through precision Higgs and electroweak measurements in Higgs-coupling, EFT, and SMEFT frameworks, with updated SMEFiT code released.

  37. Quantum Tomography and Entanglement in Semi-Leptonic $h\to VV^*$ Decays at Higher Orders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Semi-leptonic h to VV* decays retain an effective two-qutrit description for quantum tomography and entanglement after including finite fermion masses and NLO corrections.

  38. Electro-Weak Phase Transitions and Collider Signals in the Aligned 2-Higgs Doublet Model

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The Aligned 2HDM supports strong first-order electroweak phase transitions that yield LISA-detectable gravitational waves together with LHC-accessible signals from additional neutral and charged Higgs states.

  39. LHC signatures of a light pseudoscalar in a flipped two-Higgs scenario: the usefulness of boosted $b{\bar b}$ pairs

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Boosted di-b-jet tagging plus BDT analysis yields 5-10 sigma significance for a light pseudoscalar in flipped 2HDM with 3 ab^{-1} including 10% systematics.

  40. Higgs production in association with a Z boson at TeV-scale lepton colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    At TeV lepton colliders the neutrino-associated Zh production cross section surpasses direct Zh production above a few TeV, with interference patterns made interpretable by the Feynman-diagram gauge.

  41. Electroweak phase transitions in a $U(1)_D$ extension of the standard model with dimension-six operators: Gravitational waves and LHC signatures

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A dimension-six operator |H|^2|phi|^4 in a U(1)_D singlet extension relaxes the usual Higgs-portal and mixing-angle correlation, enabling strong first-order electroweak phase transitions driven primarily by the singlet VEV.

  42. Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions using the $\gamma\gamma$ final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Updated constraints from the full Run 2 dataset show no evidence for anomalous Higgs couplings in gluon fusion, vector boson fusion, and associated production modes decaying to two photons.

  43. Search for charginos and neutralinos with $B-L$ $R$-parity violating decays in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV and $13.6$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 4.0

    No evidence for charginos and neutralinos in R-parity violating Higgs-decay channels; masses 150-1100 GeV excluded at 95% CL assuming equal lepton branching fractions.

  44. Distinguishing Higgs portal and neutralino dark matter via vector boson fusion

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Vector boson fusion processes at the LHC distinguish Higgs portal dark matter from neutralino dark matter at over 5 sigma using jet kinematics and a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with linear discriminant analysis.

  45. Phenomenology of electroweak spin-1 resonances

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Composite Higgs models with SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R predict spin-1 resonances mixing with electroweak bosons that remain viable at the LHC down to masses of about 1.5 TeV.

  46. Multi-Lepton Probes of the Drell-Yan Production of Triplet Higgses

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The ΔSM real Higgs triplet model is consistent with LHC triboson excesses but predicts more events than observed and is not preferred over the Standard Model.

  47. Same-Sign Tetralepton Signature at $\mu$TRISTAN

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper identifies promising parameter regions for observing same-sign tetralepton events from charged Higgs pair and single production decaying to muons and heavy neutral leptons at μTRISTAN.

  48. Mono-Z' Signatures in the B-L Supersymmetric Standard Model at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Mono-Z' events from Z' plus singlet Higgs production in the BLSSM-IS, with h' decaying to LSP dark matter pairs, yield a detectable leptonic signal independent of the specific DM candidate.

  49. Search for quantum black holes in lepton+jet final states using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 4.0

    No significant excess of high-mass lepton+jet events is observed in 164 fb^{-1} of 13.6 TeV pp collisions, setting 95% CL upper limits on quantum black hole production cross-section times branching ratio that reach a ...

  50. Probing Flavor-Violating Higgs Decays in the Type-III Two-Higgs-Doublet Model at the LHC and HL-LHC

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    In the Type-III 2HDM, neutral and heavy charged flavor-violating Higgs decays can exceed 5 sigma significance at 300 fb^{-1} luminosity while the light charged mode is more background-limited.

  51. Probing inelastic sub-GeV dark matter at the DUNE near detector

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    DUNE's ND-LAr can probe sub-GeV inelastic dark matter parameter space consistent with relic abundance via dark Higgs-mediated annihilation, especially at large dark photon-to-DM mass ratios.

  52. The $Z_3$ soft breaking in the I(2+1)HDM and its cosmological probes

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Soft Z3 breaking in the I(2+1)HDM makes the lightest Z3-charged neutral scalar a dark matter candidate while allowing a long-lived opposite-CP state to contribute to relic density or yield missing-energy plus multi-le...

  53. Exploring new resonances with direct top flavor changing interactions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Three new physics resonances with top flavor-changing couplings are mapped to SMEFT operators at the electroweak scale and their phenomenology is analyzed.

  54. Sensitivity to top-quark FCNC interactions at future muon colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A 10 TeV muon collider with 10 ab^{-1} could reach O(10^{-3}) sensitivity on top-quark FCNC couplings, improving current ATLAS/CMS bounds by more than an order of magnitude.

  55. Exotic Higgs Decays at a Muon Collider

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Muon colliders at 3 TeV and 10 TeV can probe branching ratios for h to SS decays in 4b and 2b2μ channels down to 10^{-3}–10^{-5}, improving on HL-LHC projections using machine learning.

  56. Probing Heavy Neutral Higgs Bosons via Single Vector-Like Bottom Quark Production at the HL-LHC

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    XGBoost multivariate analysis extends the 5-sigma discovery reach for singly produced vector-like bottom quarks decaying via heavy neutral Higgs bosons to 1.6 TeV at the HL-LHC with 3 ab^{-1}.

  57. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    hep-ph 2014-10 accept novelty 4.0

    PYTHIA 8.2 is a mature C++ event generator that combines hard processes, parton showers, multiparton interactions, and string fragmentation into a complete simulation framework for high-energy collisions.

  58. Search for new physics in triple boson production in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV using the effective field theory approach

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    No excess in VVV production; bounds set on c_W/Λ² (-0.13 to 0.12 TeV^{-2}) and c_Hq3/Λ² (-0.24 to 0.21 TeV^{-2}) at 95% CL.

  59. Possibility of Probing an Extra Higgs Boson at the Compact Linear Collider

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    CLIC can probe an additional neutral Higgs boson H in the Two Higgs Doublet Model through the process e+e- to H nu nu-bar with H decaying to WW in the dilepton channel.

  60. Jarvis-HEP: A lightweight Python framework for workflow composition and parameter scans in high-energy physics

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Jarvis-HEP introduces a YAML-based Python framework for composing workflows and performing parameter scans in high-energy physics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 65 Pith papers · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories , Phys.Rev.Lett. 30 (1973) 1343–1346

  2. [2]

    H. D. Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions? , Phys.Rev.Lett. 30 (1973) 1346–1349

  3. [3]

    Appelquist and H

    T. Appelquist and H. Georgi, e+e− annihilation in gauge theories of strong interactions , Phys.Rev. D8 (1973) 4000–4002

  4. [4]

    G. F. Sterman and S. Weinberg, Jets from Quantum Chromodynamics , Phys.Rev.Lett. 39 (1977) 1436

  5. [5]

    Buras, E

    A. Buras, E. Floratos, D. Ross, and C. T. Sachrajda, Asymptotic Freedom Beyond the Leading Order, Nucl.Phys. B131 (1977) 308

  6. [6]

    W. A. Bardeen, A. Buras, D. Duke, and T. Muta, Deep Inelastic Scattering Beyond the Leading Order in Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories , Phys.Rev. D18 (1978) 3998

  7. [7]

    Altarelli, R

    G. Altarelli, R. K. Ellis, and G. Martinelli, Leptoproduction and Drell-Yan Processes Beyond the Leading Approximation in Chromodynamics , Nucl.Phys. B143 (1978) 521

  8. [8]

    Celmaster and R

    W. Celmaster and R. J. Gonsalves, Fourth Order QCD Contributions to the e+e− Annihilation Cross-Section, Phys.Rev. D21 (1980) 3112

  9. [9]

    R. K. Ellis, D. Ross, and A. Terrano, The Perturbative Calculation of Jet Structure in e+e− Annihilation, Nucl.Phys. B178 (1981) 421

  10. [10]

    Frixione, Z

    S. Frixione, Z. Kunszt, and A. Signer, Three jet cross-sections to next-to-leading order , Nucl.Phys. B467 (1996) 399–442, [ hep-ph/9512328]

  11. [11]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Seymour, A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in N LO QCD, Nucl.Phys. B485 (1997) 291–419, [ hep-ph/9605323]

  12. [12]

    Frixione, A general approach to jet cross sections in QCD , Nucl

    S. Frixione, A General approach to jet cross-sections in QCD , Nucl.Phys. B507 (1997) 295–314, [ hep-ph/9706545]

  13. [13]

    D. A. Kosower, Antenna factorization of gauge theory amplitudes , Phys.Rev. D57 (1998) 5410–5416, [ hep-ph/9710213]

  14. [14]

    J. M. Campbell, M. Cullen, and E. N. Glover, Four jet event shapes in electron–positron annihilation, Eur.Phys.J. C9 (1999) 245–265, [ hep-ph/9809429]

  15. [15]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower, One-loop n-point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits , Nucl.Phys. B425 (1994) 217–260, [hep-ph/9403226]. – 138 –

  16. [16]

    del Aguila and R

    F. del Aguila and R. Pittau, Recursive numerical calculus of one-loop tensor integrals , JHEP 0407 (2004) 017, [ hep-ph/0404120]

  17. [17]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower, Bootstrapping multi-parton loop amplitudes in QCD, Phys.Rev. D73 (2006) 065013, [ hep-ph/0507005]

  18. [18]

    Ossola, C

    G. Ossola, C. G. Papadopoulos, and R. Pittau, Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level , Nucl.Phys. B763 (2007) 147–169, [ hep-ph/0609007]

  19. [19]

    Anastasiou, R

    C. Anastasiou, R. Britto, B. Feng, Z. Kunszt, and P. Mastrolia , D-dimensional unitarity cut method, Phys.Lett. B645 (2007) 213–216, [ hep-ph/0609191]

  20. [20]

    Anastasiou, R

    C. Anastasiou, R. Britto, B. Feng, Z. Kunszt, and P. Mastrolia , Unitarity cuts and Reduction to master integrals in d dimensions for one-loop a mplitudes, JHEP 0703 (2007) 111, [ hep-ph/0612277]

  21. [21]

    R. K. Ellis, W. Giele, and Z. Kunszt, A Numerical Unitarity Formalism for Evaluating One-Loop Amplitudes, JHEP 0803 (2008) 003, [ arXiv:0708.2398]

  22. [22]

    R. K. Ellis, W. T. Giele, Z. Kunszt, and K. Melnikov, Masses, fermions and generalized D-dimensional unitarity , Nucl.Phys. B822 (2009) 270–282, [ arXiv:0806.3467]

  23. [23]

    W. T. Giele, Z. Kunszt, and K. Melnikov, Full one-loop amplitudes from tree amplitudes , JHEP 0804 (2008) 049, [ arXiv:0801.2237]

  24. [24]

    Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops

    F. Cascioli, P. Maierhofer, and S. Pozzorini, Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops , Phys.Rev.Lett. 108 (2012) 111601, [ arXiv:1111.5206]

  25. [25]

    Mastrolia, E

    P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, and T. Peraro, Integrand reduction of one-loop scattering amplitudes through Laurent series expansion , JHEP 1206 (2012) 095, [ arXiv:1203.0291]

  26. [26]

    Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations

    S. Frixione and B. R. Webber, Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations, JHEP 0206 (2002) 029, [ hep-ph/0204244]

  27. [27]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P. Nason, A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo alg orithms, JHEP 0411 (2004) 040, [ hep-ph/0409146]

  28. [28]

    Dobbs, Incorporating next-to-leading order matrix elements for h adronic diboson production in showering event generators , Phys.Rev

    M. Dobbs, Incorporating next-to-leading order matrix elements for h adronic diboson production in showering event generators , Phys.Rev. D64 (2001) 034016, [ hep-ph/0103174]

  29. [29]

    Y.-j. Chen, J. Collins, and X.-m. Zu, NLO corrections in MC event generator for angular distribution of Drell-Yan lepton pair production , JHEP 0204 (2002) 041, [ hep-ph/0110257]

  30. [30]

    Kurihara et al

    Y. Kurihara, J. Fujimoto, T. Ishikawa, K. Kato, S. Kawabata, et al., QCD event generators with next-to-leading order matrix elements and parton show ers, Nucl.Phys. B654 (2003) 301–319, [ hep-ph/0212216]

  31. [31]

    Nagy and D

    Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper, Matching parton showers to NLO computations , JHEP 0510 (2005) 024, [ hep-ph/0503053]

  32. [32]

    C. W. Bauer and M. D. Schwartz, Event Generation from Effective Field Theory , Phys.Rev. D76 (2007) 074004, [ hep-ph/0607296]

  33. [33]

    Nagy and D

    Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper, Parton showers with quantum interference , JHEP 0709 (2007) 114, [ arXiv:0706.0017]

  34. [34]

    W. T. Giele, D. A. Kosower, and P. Z. Skands, A simple shower and matching algorithm , Phys.Rev. D78 (2008) 014026, [ arXiv:0707.3652]. – 139 –

  35. [35]

    C. W. Bauer, F. J. Tackmann, and J. Thaler, GenEvA. I. A New framework for event generation, JHEP 0812 (2008) 010, [ arXiv:0801.4026]

  36. [36]

    A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods

    S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, M. Schonherr, and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP 1209 (2012) 049, [ arXiv:1111.1220]

  37. [37]

    Hamilton, P

    K. Hamilton, P. Nason, E. Re, and G. Zanderighi, NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production, JHEP 1310 (2013) 222, [ arXiv:1309.0017]

  38. [38]

    MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond

    J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond, JHEP 1106 (2011) 128, [ arXiv:1106.0522]

  39. [39]

    Automatic Generation of Tree Level Helicity Amplitudes

    T. Stelzer and W. Long, Automatic generation of tree level helicity amplitudes , Comput.Phys.Commun. 81 (1994) 357–371, [ hep-ph/9401258]

  40. [40]

    Caravaglios and M

    F. Caravaglios and M. Moretti, An algorithm to compute Born scattering amplitudes without Feynman graphs, Phys.Lett. B358 (1995) 332–338, [ hep-ph/9507237]

  41. [41]

    Yuasa, J

    F. Yuasa, J. Fujimoto, T. Ishikawa, M. Jimbo, T. Kaneko, et al., Automatic computation of cross-sections in HEP: Status of GRACE system , Prog.Theor.Phys.Suppl. 138 (2000) 18–23, [hep-ph/0007053]

  42. [42]

    Kanaki and C.G

    A. Kanaki and C. G. Papadopoulos, HELAC: A Package to compute electroweak helicity amplitudes, Comput.Phys.Commun. 132 (2000) 306–315, [ hep-ph/0002082]

  43. [43]

    Moretti, T

    M. Moretti, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, O’Mega: An Optimizing matrix element generator , hep-ph/0102195

  44. [44]

    Krauss, R

    F. Krauss, R. Kuhn, and G. Soff, AMEGIC++ 1.0: A Matrix element generator in C++ , JHEP 0202 (2002) 044, [ hep-ph/0109036]

  45. [45]

    M. L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, R. Pittau, and A. D. Polos a, ALPGEN, a generator for hard multiparton processes in hadronic colli sions, JHEP 0307 (2003) 001, [hep-ph/0206293]

  46. [46]

    Fujimoto, T

    J. Fujimoto, T. Ishikawa, M. Jimbo, T. Kaneko, K. Kato, et al., GRACE/SUSY automatic generation of tree amplitudes in the minimal supersymmetri c standard model , Comput.Phys.Commun. 153 (2003) 106–134, [ hep-ph/0208036]

  47. [47]

    Boos et al., CompHEP 4.4: Automatic computations from Lagrangians to events , Nucl.Instrum.Meth

    CompHEP Collaboration, E. Boos et al., CompHEP 4.4: Automatic computations from Lagrangians to events , Nucl.Instrum.Meth. A534 (2004) 250–259, [ hep-ph/0403113]

  48. [48]

    Tsuno, T

    S. Tsuno, T. Kaneko, Y. Kurihara, S. Odaka, and K. Kato, GR@PPA 2.7 event generator for pp / p¯p collisions, Comput.Phys.Commun. 175 (2006) 665–677, [ hep-ph/0602213]

  49. [49]

    Cafarella, C.G

    A. Cafarella, C. G. Papadopoulos, and M. Worek, Helac-Phegas: A Generator for all parton level processes, Comput.Phys.Commun. 180 (2009) 1941–1955, [ arXiv:0710.2427]

  50. [50]

    WHIZARD: Simulating Multi-Particle Processes at LHC and ILC

    W. Kilian, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, WHIZARD: Simulating Multi-Particle Processes at LHC and ILC , Eur.Phys.J. C71 (2011) 1742, [ arXiv:0708.4233]

  51. [51]

    MadGraph/MadEvent v4: The New Web Generation

    J. Alwall, P. Demin, S. de Visscher, R. Frederix, M. Herquet, et a l., MadGraph/MadEvent v4: The New Web Generation , JHEP 0709 (2007) 028, [ arXiv:0706.2334]

  52. [52]

    Gleisberg and S

    T. Gleisberg and S. Hoeche, Comix, a new matrix element generator , JHEP 0812 (2008) 039, [ arXiv:0808.3674]. – 140 –

  53. [53]

    CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model

    A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen, and A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model , Comput.Phys.Commun. 184 (2013) 1729–1769, [arXiv:1207.6082]

  54. [54]

    Hahn and M

    T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput.Phys.Commun. 118 (1999) 153–165, [ hep-ph/9807565]

  55. [55]

    Generating Feynman Diagrams and Amplitudes with FeynArts 3

    T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3 , Comput.Phys.Commun. 140 (2001) 418–431, [ hep-ph/0012260]

  56. [56]

    Gleisberg and F

    T. Gleisberg and F. Krauss, Automating dipole subtraction for QCD NLO calculations , Eur.Phys.J. C53 (2008) 501–523, [ arXiv:0709.2881]

  57. [57]

    Berger, Z

    C. Berger, Z. Bern, L. Dixon, F. Febres Cordero, D. Forde, e t al., An Automated Implementation of On-Shell Methods for One-Loop Amplitude s, Phys.Rev. D78 (2008) 036003, [ arXiv:0803.4180]

  58. [58]

    Frederix, T

    R. Frederix, T. Gehrmann, and N. Greiner, Automation of the Dipole Subtraction Method in MadGraph/MadEvent, JHEP 0809 (2008) 122, [ arXiv:0808.2128]

  59. [59]

    Giele and G

    W. Giele and G. Zanderighi, On the Numerical Evaluation of One-Loop Amplitudes: The Gluonic Case , JHEP 0806 (2008) 038, [ arXiv:0805.2152]

  60. [60]

    Czakon, C.G

    M. Czakon, C. Papadopoulos, and M. Worek, Polarizing the Dipoles , JHEP 0908 (2009) 085, [ arXiv:0905.0883]

  61. [61]

    Frederix, S

    R. Frederix, S. Frixione, F. Maltoni, and T. Stelzer, Automation of next-to-leading order computations in QCD: The FKS subtraction , JHEP 0910 (2009) 003, [ arXiv:0908.4272]

  62. [62]

    Hasegawa, S

    K. Hasegawa, S. Moch, and P. Uwer, AutoDipole: Automated generation of dipole subtraction terms , Comput.Phys.Commun. 181 (2010) 1802–1817, [ arXiv:0911.4371]

  63. [63]

    Höche, F

    S. Hoche, F. Krauss, M. Schonherr, and F. Siegert, Automating the POWHEG method in Sherpa, JHEP 1104 (2011) 024, [ arXiv:1008.5399]

  64. [64]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX , JHEP 1006 (2010) 043, [arXiv:1002.2581]

  65. [65]

    Mastrolia, G

    P. Mastrolia, G. Ossola, T. Reiter, and F. Tramontano, Scattering AMplitudes from Unitarity-based Reduction Algorithm at the Integrand-lev el, JHEP 1008 (2010) 080, [arXiv:1006.0710]

  66. [66]

    Frederix, T

    R. Frederix, T. Gehrmann, and N. Greiner, Integrated dipoles with MadDipole in the MadGraph framework, JHEP 1006 (2010) 086, [ arXiv:1004.2905]

  67. [67]

    Becker, C

    S. Becker, C. Reuschle, and S. Weinzierl, Numerical NLO QCD calculations , JHEP 1012 (2010) 013, [ arXiv:1010.4187]

  68. [68]

    Hirschi, R

    V. Hirschi, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, M. V. Garzelli, F. Maltoni, et a l., Automation of one-loop QCD corrections , JHEP 1105 (2011) 044, [ arXiv:1103.0621]

  69. [69]

    Bevilacqua, M

    G. Bevilacqua, M. Czakon, M. Garzelli, A. van Hameren, A. Kardo s, et al., HELAC-NLO, Comput.Phys.Commun. 184 (2013) 986–997, [ arXiv:1110.1499]

  70. [70]

    Becker, D

    S. Becker, D. Goetz, C. Reuschle, C. Schwan, and S. Weinzierl, NLO results for five, six and seven jets in electron-positron annihilation , Phys.Rev.Lett. 108 (2012) 032005, [arXiv:1111.1733]. – 141 –

  71. [71]

    Cullen, N

    G. Cullen, N. Greiner, G. Heinrich, G. Luisoni, P. Mastrolia, et al., Automated One-Loop Calculations with GoSam , Eur.Phys.J. C72 (2012) 1889, [ arXiv:1111.2034]

  72. [72]

    Binoth, D

    T. Binoth, D. Goncalves Netto, D. Lopez-Val, K. Mawatari, T. P lehn, et al., Automized Squark-Neutralino Production to Next-to-Leading Order , Phys.Rev. D84 (2011) 075005, [arXiv:1108.1250]

  73. [73]

    Agrawal, T

    S. Agrawal, T. Hahn, and E. Mirabella, FormCalc 7, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 368 (2012) 012054, [arXiv:1112.0124]

  74. [74]

    Z. Bern, G. Diana, L. Dixon, F. Febres Cordero, S. Hoeche, et al., Four-Jet Production at the Large Hadron Collider at Next-to-Leading Order in QCD , Phys.Rev.Lett. 109 (2012) 042001, [ arXiv:1112.3940]

  75. [75]

    Actis, A

    S. Actis, A. Denner, L. Hofer, A. Scharf, and S. Uccirati, Recursive generation of one-loop amplitudes in the Standard Model , JHEP 1304 (2013) 037, [ arXiv:1211.6316]

  76. [76]

    Badger, B

    S. Badger, B. Biedermann, P. Uwer, and V. Yundin, Numerical evaluation of virtual corrections to multi-jet production in massless QCD , Comput.Phys.Commun. 184 (2013) 1981–1998, [ arXiv:1209.0100]

  77. [77]

    Goncalves-Netto, D

    D. Goncalves-Netto, D. Lopez-Val, K. Mawatari, T. Plehn, and I. Wigmore, Automated Squark and Gluino Production to Next-to-Leading Order , Phys.Rev. D87 (2013) 014002, [arXiv:1211.0286]

  78. [78]

    Badger, B

    S. Badger, B. Biedermann, P. Uwer, and V. Yundin, Computation of multi-leg amplitudes with NJet , arXiv:1312.7140

  79. [79]

    Z. Bern, L. Dixon, F. F. Cordero, S. Hoeche, H. Ita, et al., The BlackHat Library for One-Loop Amplitudes, arXiv:1310.2808

  80. [80]

    van Deurzen, G

    H. van Deurzen, G. Luisoni, P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, G. Ossola, et al., Multi-leg One-loop Massive Amplitudes from Integrand Reduction via Laurent Ex pansion, JHEP 1403 (2014) 115, [ arXiv:1312.6678]

Showing first 80 references.