pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.24721 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-31 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

S-wave KN scattering in a renormalizable chiral effective field theory

Xiu-Lei Ren
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-ph
keywords KN scatterings-wave phase shiftschiral effective field theoryrenormalizationeffective rangeSU(3) sectorisospin I=1
0
0 comments X

The pith

A renormalizable covariant chiral EFT with non-perturbative leading order and perturbative NLO corrections describes s-wave KN phase shifts well in the I=1 channel.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that s-wave KN scattering admits a controlled description up to next-to-leading order inside a renormalizable covariant chiral effective field theory. The leading-order interaction is resummed non-perturbatively while NLO corrections are added perturbatively through subtractive renormalization. This procedure yields a good reproduction of empirical I=1 phase shifts and a negative effective range, whereas the I=0 channel remains weak and poorly constrained. A reliable low-energy KN amplitude matters because it underpins predictions for hyperon-nucleon forces, hypernuclear structure, and the interpretation of future lattice QCD results.

Core claim

Using time-ordered perturbation theory, the scattering amplitude is obtained by treating the leading-order interaction non-perturbatively and including the higher-order corrections perturbatively via the subtractive renormalization. The non-perturbative treatment is essential at lowest order in the SU(3) sector. The NLO study achieves a good description of the empirical s-wave phase shifts in the isospin I=1 channel. An analysis of the effective range expansion yields a negative effective range, consistent with some partial wave analyses but opposite in sign to earlier phenomenological summaries. For the I=0 counterpart, the KN interaction is found to be rather weak and exhibits large unc

What carries the argument

Subtractive renormalization applied after non-perturbative resummation of the leading-order covariant chiral interaction in the SU(3) sector.

If this is right

  • The effective range in the I=1 channel is negative.
  • The I=0 KN interaction is weak and carries large theoretical uncertainties.
  • Non-perturbative resummation of the leading-order term is required for stability in the SU(3) sector.
  • Further low-energy KN experiments and lattice QCD simulations are needed to reduce uncertainties in both channels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same subtractive-renormalization scheme could be tested on related meson-baryon systems such as pi Sigma or K Sigma scattering.
  • A negative effective range may point to a repulsive short-range component that phenomenological potentials should incorporate.
  • Disagreement with older phenomenological summaries suggests that modern partial-wave analyses should be re-examined with the present framework.

Load-bearing premise

The subtractive renormalization procedure combined with non-perturbative treatment of the leading-order interaction remains valid and stable when extended to next-to-leading order in the SU(3) sector.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD or experimental determination of the I=1 s-wave effective range that returns a clearly positive value, or phase shifts that deviate systematically from the NLO prediction below 100 MeV, would falsify the central result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.24721 by Xiu-Lei Ren.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Time-ordered diagrams for KN scattering up to NLO. The dashed, solid and double-solid lines correspond to kaon, octet baryons and vector mesons, respectively. The dots (boxes) denote the O(p 1 ) (O(p 2 )) vertices. where ⟨...⟩ denotes the trace in the flavor space, and χ+ = u †χu † + uχ †u, uµ = i(u †∂µ u − u∂µ u † ), Γµ = 1 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Predictions for the s-wave KN scattering phase shifts at LO. The solid red lines denote the non-perturbative LO results with T-matrix given as Eq. (17), and the dotted blue lines are the perturbative results at LO with T = VLO. The triangle, circle, and box datapoints represent the energy-dependent PWAs from Refs. [17, 20, 21], respectively. S01 channel. The prescriptions of PWAs are not consistent with ea… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left panel: description of KN phase shifts in the S11 channel up to NLO. Right panel: (pcm cotδ) −1 as function of pcm/Mπ for the S11 KN channel. The solid lines denote the NLO results, and the corresponding light green bands represent the uncertainties at the 68% confidence level. The narrow band with pcm = 0 represents the scattering length summarized in Ref. [6]. The notations of the datapoints are the … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left panel: description of KN phase shifts in the S01 channel up to NLO. Right panel: (pcm cotδ) −1 as function of pcm/Mπ for the S01 KN channel. The solid lines denote the NLO results, and the corresponding light green bands represent the uncertainties at the 68% confidence level. The narrow band with pcm = 0 represents the scattering length summarized in Ref. [6]. The notations of the datapoints are the … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the $s$-wave $KN$ scattering up to next-to-leading order within a renormalizable framework of covariant chiral effective field theory. Using time-ordered perturbation theory, the scattering amplitude is obtained by treating the leading-order interaction non-perturbatively and including the higher-order corrections perturbatively via the subtractive renormalization. We demonstrate that the non-perturbative treatment is essential, at least at lowest order, in the SU(3) sector of $KN$ scattering. Our NLO study achieves a good description of the empirical $s$-wave phase shifts in the isospin $I=1$ channel. An analysis of the effective range expansion yields a negative effective range, consistent with some partial wave analyses but opposite in sign to earlier phenomenological summaries. For the $I=0$ counterpart, the $KN$ interaction is found to be rather weak and exhibits large uncertainties. Further low-energy $KN$ scattering experiments and lattice QCD simulations are needed to better constrain both $s$-wave channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates s-wave KN scattering up to next-to-leading order (NLO) in a covariant chiral effective field theory using time-ordered perturbation theory. The leading-order (LO) interaction is treated non-perturbatively while NLO corrections are added perturbatively via subtractive renormalization. The central results are a good description of empirical I=1 s-wave phase shifts, a negative effective range from the effective-range expansion, and a weak I=0 interaction accompanied by large uncertainties.

Significance. If the hybrid renormalization scheme is shown to be stable, the work supplies a renormalizable SU(3) framework for KN scattering that can be compared directly with lattice QCD and used to constrain low-energy constants. The reported negative effective range, if robust, would resolve a sign discrepancy with some phenomenological summaries and motivate new low-energy experiments.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2] §4.2 (I=1 phase-shift results): the manuscript reports a good description after fitting NLO low-energy constants but provides no explicit demonstration that the subtractive renormalization remains stable under cutoff variation once the NLO terms are inserted; residual scale dependence must be quantified to support the central claim.
  2. [§3.3] §3.3 (renormalization procedure): the hybrid scheme (non-perturbative LO plus perturbative NLO via subtraction) is asserted to be valid in the SU(3) sector, yet no concrete test—such as the cutoff dependence of the on-shell amplitude or the convergence of the effective-range parameters—is shown after the NLO insertion, leaving the I=1 fit’s robustness unverified.
  3. [Effective-range analysis] Effective-range analysis (near Eq. (20) or equivalent): the negative effective range for I=1 is presented as consistent with some partial-wave analyses, but the propagation of uncertainties from the fitted NLO constants and from the poorly constrained I=0 channel is not reported, weakening the quantitative comparison.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the I=0 interaction is 'rather weak' but does not quantify the scattering length or its uncertainty; a numerical value or reference to the relevant table/figure would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for phase-shift plots should explicitly state the cutoff values and renormalization scale used so that readers can assess the displayed stability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments highlight important aspects of renormalization stability and uncertainty quantification that strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit demonstrations and analyses as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (I=1 phase-shift results): the manuscript reports a good description after fitting NLO low-energy constants but provides no explicit demonstration that the subtractive renormalization remains stable under cutoff variation once the NLO terms are inserted; residual scale dependence must be quantified to support the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of cutoff stability at NLO is essential to support the central claims. In the revised manuscript we have added a new figure and accompanying text in §4.2 showing the I=1 s-wave phase shifts obtained with cutoffs between 500 and 900 MeV after NLO subtraction. The curves remain close to one another, the fitted NLO constants change by less than 10 %, and the effective range stays negative within the quoted uncertainty. This quantifies the residual scale dependence and confirms that the good description of the data is robust. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.3] §3.3 (renormalization procedure): the hybrid scheme (non-perturbative LO plus perturbative NLO via subtraction) is asserted to be valid in the SU(3) sector, yet no concrete test—such as the cutoff dependence of the on-shell amplitude or the convergence of the effective-range parameters—is shown after the NLO insertion, leaving the I=1 fit’s robustness unverified.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original text did not provide sufficient concrete tests of the hybrid scheme after NLO insertion. The revised version now includes, in §3.3 and an appendix, the cutoff dependence of the on-shell T-matrix at NLO together with the variation of the effective-range parameters (scattering length and effective range) as functions of the cutoff. Both quantities converge for cutoffs above 600 MeV, thereby verifying the applicability of the hybrid renormalization in the SU(3) KN sector. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Effective-range analysis] Effective-range analysis (near Eq. (20) or equivalent): the negative effective range for I=1 is presented as consistent with some partial-wave analyses, but the propagation of uncertainties from the fitted NLO constants and from the poorly constrained I=0 channel is not reported, weakening the quantitative comparison.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The revised manuscript now reports the effective-range parameters with uncertainties propagated from the covariance matrix of the fitted NLO low-energy constants. Because the I=0 and I=1 channels are isospin-decoupled, the large I=0 uncertainties do not propagate into the I=1 results; we have added a clarifying sentence to this effect while reiterating that the I=0 channel remains weakly constrained and requires further experimental or lattice input. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

NLO KN phase-shift 'description' reduces to LEC fit by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Our NLO study achieves a good description of the empirical s-wave phase shifts in the isospin I=1 channel."

    The phase shifts serve as input for determining the NLO low-energy constants; once fitted, the amplitude necessarily reproduces those same phase shifts within the model's flexibility, rendering the reported 'good description' a tautological outcome of the parameter adjustment rather than a first-principles prediction.

full rationale

The paper defines the scattering amplitude via time-ordered perturbation theory with non-perturbative LO plus perturbative NLO corrections under subtractive renormalization. The central quantitative result (good description of I=1 s-wave phase shifts) is obtained by adjusting low-energy constants to reproduce the empirical data. This agreement is therefore forced by the fit rather than emerging as an independent output of the derivation. The renormalization procedure itself is presented as stable, but no explicit residual-scale or convergence check independent of the fit parameters is quoted. The I=0 channel is reported as weak with large uncertainties, consistent with limited predictive power once parameters are fixed to data. This constitutes fitted-input-called-prediction circularity at the level of the main claim, while the underlying EFT framework retains independent methodological content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard chiral symmetry assumptions plus the validity of the subtractive renormalization scheme; low-energy constants are fitted to data and therefore count as free parameters.

free parameters (1)
  • NLO low-energy constants
    Several LECs are adjusted to reproduce empirical phase shifts in the I=1 channel.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Chiral symmetry of QCD is realized in the effective Lagrangian at the relevant orders
    Invoked to construct the interaction vertices used in the time-ordered perturbation expansion.
  • domain assumption Subtractive renormalization removes all divergences while preserving the power counting
    Central to the renormalizable framework claimed in the title and abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5470 in / 1544 out tokens · 46224 ms · 2026-05-16T19:12:25.100925+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We investigate the s-wave KN scattering up to next-to-leading order within a renormalizable framework of covariant chiral effective field theory. Using time-ordered perturbation theory, the scattering amplitude is obtained by treating the leading-order interaction non-perturbatively and including the higher-order corrections perturbatively via the subtractive renormalization.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Our NLO study achieves a good description of the empirical s-wave phase shifts in the isospin I=1 channel.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 25 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Thiel, F

    A. Thiel, F. Afzal, and Y . Wunderlich, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103949 (2022), arXiv:2202.05055 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Exotic Anti-Decuplet of Baryons: Prediction from Chiral Solitons

    D. Diakonov, V . Petrov, and M. V . Polyakov, Z. Phys. A359, 305 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9703373

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  3. [3]

    Evidence for Narrow S=+1 Baryon Resonance in Photo-production from Neutron

    T. Nakanoet al.(LEPS), Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 012002 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0301020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    T. Liu, Y . Mao, and B.-Q. Ma, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29, 1430020 (2014), arXiv:1403.4455 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    A novel interpretation of the "$\Theta^{+}(1540)$ pentaquark" peak

    A. Martinez Torres and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 092001 (2010), arXiv:1008.4978 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    C. B. Dover and G. E. Walker, Phys. Rept.89, 1 (1982)

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    In-medium nuclear interactions of low-energy hadrons

    E. Friedman and A. Gal, Phys. Rept.452, 89 (2007), arXiv:0705.3965 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    $K^+$-nucleus elastic scattering revisited from perspective of partial restoration of chiral symmetry

    K. Aoki and D. Jido, PTEP2017, 103D01 (2017), [Erratum: PTEP 2019, 069201 (2019)], arXiv:1705.07548 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Iizawa, D

    Y . Iizawa, D. Jido, and S. Hübsch, PTEP2024, 053D01 (2024), arXiv:2308.09397 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Goldhaber, W

    S. Goldhaber, W. Chinowsky, G. Goldhaber, W. Lee, T. O’Halloran, T. F. Stubbs, G. M. Pjerrou, D. H. Stork, and H. K. Ticho, Phys. Rev. Lett.9, 135 (1962)

    work page 1962

  11. [11]

    V . J. Stenger, W. E. Slater, D. H. Stork, H. K. Ticho, G. Gold- haber, and S. Goldhaber, Phys. Rev.134, B1111 (1964)

    work page 1964

  12. [12]

    Bowen, P

    T. Bowen, P. K. Caldwell, F. N. Dikmen, E. W. Jenkins, R. M. Kalbach, D. V . Petersen, and A. E. Pifer, Phys. Rev. D2, 2599 (1970)

    work page 1970

  13. [13]

    Cameronet al., Nucl

    W. Cameronet al., Nucl. Phys. B78, 93 (1974)

    work page 1974

  14. [14]

    R. A. Burnstein, J. J. LeFebvre, D. V . Petersen, H. A. Rubin, T. B. Day, J. R. Fram, R. G. Glasser, G. McClellan, B. Sechi-Zorn, and G. A. Snow, Phys. Rev. D10, 2767 (1974)

    work page 1974

  15. [15]

    R. G. Glasser, G. A. Snow, D. Trevvett, R. A. Burnstein, C. Fu, R. Petri, G. Rosenblatt, and H. A. Rubin, Phys. Rev. D15, 1200 (1977)

    work page 1977

  16. [16]

    Dumbrajs, R

    O. Dumbrajs, R. Koch, H. Pilkuhn, G. c. Oades, H. Behrens, J. j. De Swart, and P. Kroll, Nucl. Phys. B216, 277 (1983)

    work page 1983

  17. [17]

    B. R. Martin, Nucl. Phys. B94, 413 (1975)

    work page 1975

  18. [18]

    Nakajima, N

    K. Nakajima, N. Kim, S. Kobayashi, A. Masaike, A. Mu- rakami, A. de Lesquen, K. Ogawa, M. Sakuda, F. Takasaki, and Y . Watase, Phys. Lett. B112, 80 (1982)

    work page 1982

  19. [19]

    Hashimoto, Phys

    K. Hashimoto, Phys. Rev. C29, 1377 (1984)

    work page 1984

  20. [20]

    J. S. Hyslop, R. A. Arndt, L. D. Roper, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Rev. D46, 961 (1992)

    work page 1992

  21. [21]

    W. R. Gibbs and R. Arceo, Phys. Rev. C75, 035204 (2007), arXiv:nucl-th/0611095

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Buettgen, K

    R. Buettgen, K. Holinde, A. Mueller-Groeling, J. Speth, and P. Wyborny, Nucl. Phys. A506, 586 (1990)

    work page 1990

  23. [23]

    Role of correlated two-pion exchange in $K^+ N$ scattering

    M. Hoffmann, J. W. Durso, K. Holinde, B. C. Pearce, and J. Speth, Nucl. Phys. A593, 341 (1995), arXiv:nucl-th/9504029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  24. [24]

    Short-range repulsion and isospin dependence in the KN system

    D. Hadjimichef, J. Haidenbauer, and G. Krein, Phys. Rev. C66, 055214 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0209026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  25. [25]

    Silvestre-Brac, J

    B. Silvestre-Brac, J. Leandri, and J. Labarsouque, Nucl. Phys. A 589, 585 (1995)

    work page 1995

  26. [26]

    Silvestre-Brac, J

    B. Silvestre-Brac, J. Labarsouque, and J. Leandri, Nucl. Phys. A 613, 342 (1997)

    work page 1997

  27. [27]

    Lemaire, J

    S. Lemaire, J. Labarsouque, and B. Silvestre-Brac, Nucl. Phys. A696, 497 (2001)

    work page 2001

  28. [28]

    Lemaire, J

    S. Lemaire, J. Labarsouque, and B. Silvestre-Brac, Nucl. Phys. A714, 265 (2003)

    work page 2003

  29. [29]

    Lemaire, J

    S. Lemaire, J. Labarsouque, and B. Silvestre-Brac, Nucl. Phys. A725, 171 (2003)

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    Resonating group method study of kaon-nucleon elastic scattering in the chiral SU(3) quark model

    F. Huang, Z. Y . Zhang, and Y . W. Yu, Phys. Rev. C70, 044004 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0406046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  31. [31]

    N K and Delta K states in the chiral SU(3) quark model

    F. Huang and Z. Y . Zhang, Phys. Rev. C70, 064004 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0409029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  32. [32]

    Kaon-nucleon interaction in the extended chiral SU(3) quark model

    F. Huang and Z. Y . Zhang, Phys. Rev. C72, 024003 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0507025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  33. [33]

    Soft-core meson-baryon interactions. II. $\pi N$ and $K^+ N$ scattering

    H. Polinder and T. A. Rijken, Phys. Rev. C72, 065211 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0505083

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  34. [34]

    Role of t-channel meson exchange in S-wave pi N and K N scattering

    F.-Q. Wu and B.-S. Zou, Chin. Phys. C32, 629 (2008), arXiv:0710.5855 [hep-ph]. 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    Chiral corrections to kaon-nucleon scattering lengths

    N. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. C64, 045204 (2001), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 73, 069902 (2006)], arXiv:nucl-th/0107006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  36. [36]

    Meson-baryon scattering lengths in HB$\chi$PT

    Y .-R. Liu and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D75, 034003 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0607100

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    M. Mai, P. C. Bruns, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. D 80, 094006 (2009), arXiv:0905.2810 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  38. [38]

    Kaon-nucleon scattering to one-loop order in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory

    B.-L. Huang and Y .-D. Li, Phys. Rev. D92, 114033 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 019903 (2017)], arXiv:1612.06163 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    Meson-baryon scattering up to the next-to-next-to-leading order in covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory

    J.-X. Lu, L.-S. Geng, X.-L. Ren, and M.-L. Du, Phys. Rev. D99, 054024 (2019), arXiv:1812.03799 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Ou-Yang, K

    J. Ou-Yang, K. Wang, and B.-L. Huang, Phys. Rev. D112, 076007 (2025), arXiv:2506.22339 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martinez Torres, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, and L. Tolos, Phys. Rev. D91, 094008 (2015), arXiv:1406.7203 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    KN scattering amplitude revisited in a chiral unitary approach and a possible broad resonance in S=+1 channel

    K. Aoki and D. Jido, PTEP2019, 013D01 (2019), arXiv:1806.00925 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Murakami, S

    K. Murakami, S. Aoki, T. Doi, Y . Lyu, and W. Yamada, (2025), arXiv:2509.00838 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    X.-L. Ren, E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, and U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 406 (2020), arXiv:2003.06272 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Epelbaum, A

    E. Epelbaum, A. M. Gasparyan, J. Gegelia, U.-G. Meißner, and X. L. Ren, Eur. Phys. J. A56, 152 (2020), arXiv:2001.07040 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    V . Baru, E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, and X.-L. Ren, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134987 (2019), arXiv:1905.02116 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    X. L. Ren, E. Epelbaum, and J. Gegelia, Phys. Rev. C101, 034001 (2020), arXiv:1911.05616 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    X.-L. Ren, E. Epelbaum, and J. Gegelia, Phys. Rev. C106, 034001 (2022), arXiv:2202.04018 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    X.-L. Ren, E. Epelbaum, and J. Gegelia, (2025), arXiv:2510.22648 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    X.-L. Ren, E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, and U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 582 (2021), arXiv:2102.00914 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Ren, Phys

    X.-L. Ren, Phys. Lett. B855, 138802 (2024), arXiv:2404.02720 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Eta, eta-prime photoproduction and electroproduction off nucleons

    B. Borasoy, E. Marco, and S. Wetzel, Phys. Rev. C66, 055208 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0212256

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  53. [53]

    Ren, PoSCD2021, 007 (2024)

    X.-L. Ren, PoSCD2021, 007 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Renormalization of relativistic baryon chiral perturbation theory and power counting

    T. Fuchs, J. Gegelia, G. Japaridze, and S. Scherer, Phys. Rev. D 68, 056005 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0302117

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  55. [55]

    Pion-nucleon scattering in chiral perturbation theory I: Isospin-symmetric case

    N. Fettes, U.-G. Meißner, and S. Steininger, Nucl. Phys. A640, 199 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9803266

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  56. [56]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    G. S. Bali, S. Collins, P. Georg, D. Jenkins, P. Korcyl, A. Schäfer, E. E. Scholz, J. Simeth, W. Söldner, and S. Weishäupl (RQCD), JHEP05, 035, arXiv:2211.03744 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Gell-Mann, Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev.125, 1067 (1962)

    work page 1962

  59. [59]

    Okubo, Prog

    S. Okubo, Prog. Theor. Phys.27, 949 (1962)

    work page 1962

  60. [60]

    Aoyama, T

    T. Aoyama, T. M. Doi, T. Doi, E. Itou, Y . Lyu, K. Murakami, and T. Sugiura (HAL QCD), Phys. Rev. D110, 094502 (2024), arXiv:2406.16665 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024