arxiv: 2601.15376 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-21 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

On sqrt{Toverline{T}} deformed pathways: CFT to CCFT

Aritra Banerjee , Pulastya Parekh , Robin Raj

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords TTbar deformationCarrollian conformal field theoryBMS symmetrymarginal deformation2D scalar field theoryLegendre transformationsymmetry transitionstring theory deformation

0 comments

The pith

A marginal √(TTbar) deformation of 2D massless scalar theories preserves relativistic conformal symmetries until special moduli points where the algebra transitions smoothly to Carrollian conformal symmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the dynamical effects of a marginal deformation driven by the square root of the product of the two stress-energy tensor components on two-dimensional massless scalar field theories. Operator flow equations for this deformation produce a Legendre transformation that relates the deformed Lagrangian to the deformed Hamiltonian while remaining unchanged throughout the flow. This setup allows the conformal symmetries to stay intact for most values of the deformation parameter, only changing at special points in moduli space where the relativistic conformal algebra becomes the Carrollian conformal algebra, equivalently the BMS algebra. The analysis is carried out in both configuration space and phase space, and the extreme limits of the flow recover the standard electric Carroll theory while producing a new magnetic Carroll theory. A geometric picture of these dynamical maps is illustrated with an explicit example from a deformed string theory in flat space.

Core claim

The marginal √TTbar deformation does not change the conformal symmetries of the theory until some special points in the moduli space are reached, and the relativistic conformal algebra smoothly changes to the Carrollian conformal (equivalently BMS) one. The operator flow equations induce a Legendre transformation between flowed Lagrangians and flowed Hamiltonians that remains unchanged during the entire flow, enabling consistent tracking of the symmetry transition from both configuration and phase space viewpoints. In the extreme limits of the flow parameter the actions reduce to the usual electric Carroll theory and uncover a novel magnetic counterpart, with a concrete realization provided,

What carries the argument

The operator flow equations that induce an unchanged Legendre transformation between flowed Lagrangians and Hamiltonians, allowing the symmetry transition to be tracked from configuration space to phase space.

Load-bearing premise

That the operator flow equations induce a Legendre transformation between flowed Lagrangians and Hamiltonians that remains unchanged during the entire flow.

What would settle it

Direct computation of the conformal algebra commutators or conserved charges at successive values of the deformation parameter, checking whether they remain relativistic until a specific critical value and then match the Carrollian algebra.

read the original abstract

We discuss the marginal $\sqrt{T\overline{T}}$ deformation of massless scalar field theories in two dimensions from a dynamical perspective. The operator flow equations for such deformations induce a particular Legendre Transformation between flowed Lagrangians and flowed Hamiltonians. The marginal deformation does not change the conformal symmetries of the theory, until some special points in the moduli space are reached, and the relativistic conformal algebra smoothly changes to the Carrollian conformal (equivalently BMS) one. We investigate this change of symmetry from both configuration space and phase space point of view, while keeping the notion of Legendre Transformation unchanged during the flow. By expanding the actions, in the extreme limits of the flow parameter, we recover the usual ``Electric'' Carroll theory and further uncover a novel ``Magnetic'' counterpart. We discuss the intriguing geometric understanding of such dynamical maps for the deformed theories, and also provide a concrete example for the same from a deformed string theory in flat space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper traces a √TTbar deformation that keeps conformal symmetries intact until special moduli points where they shift to Carrollian ones, recovering the electric Carroll limit and adding a new magnetic version, but the Legendre invariance needs checking exactly at those transition points.

read the letter

The main result is that a marginal √(T T-bar) deformation on a 2d massless scalar keeps the relativistic conformal algebra unchanged for most of the flow parameter range, then smoothly deforms it into the Carrollian (BMS) algebra at special points in moduli space. They track this from both the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian sides by holding the Legendre transform fixed throughout, expand the action in the extreme limits to recover the standard electric Carroll theory, and identify a new magnetic Carroll counterpart. A flat-space string theory example and some geometric picture of the dynamical maps round out the concrete side of the argument. This is new relative to the usual TTbar literature cited in the abstract. The consistent treatment of the flow equations and the dual config/phase-space view is the part that works cleanly. The soft spot is the assumption that the Legendre relation between flowed L and H stays exactly the same form when the dispersion relation switches from relativistic to ultra-relativistic at the transition points. Expanding the action recovers the limiting theories, but it is not obvious from the high-level description whether the canonical momenta definition continues to produce the same H via the standard transform right where the algebra changes. If the full derivations confirm this without extra fitting, the claim holds; otherwise the symmetry tracking could need adjustment. This is for people already working on 2d deformations, Carrollian limits, and flat-space holography. The thinking is coherent on its own terms and the new magnetic limit is a genuine addition, so it deserves a serious referee even if the transition step needs more explicit verification in the write-up. I would send it out for review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the marginal √T T-bar deformation of two-dimensional massless scalar field theories from a dynamical viewpoint. Operator flow equations are shown to induce a Legendre transformation between the deformed Lagrangians and Hamiltonians that is preserved throughout the flow. The deformation leaves the conformal symmetries intact until special points in the moduli space, where the relativistic conformal algebra transitions smoothly into the Carrollian conformal (BMS) algebra. The authors track this transition from both configuration-space and phase-space perspectives, recover the standard electric Carroll limit and a novel magnetic Carroll limit via action expansions at extreme values of the flow parameter, and illustrate the construction with a deformed string theory example in flat space.

Significance. If the invariance of the Legendre map is rigorously established through the transition points, the work supplies a concrete dynamical route connecting relativistic CFTs to Carrollian CCFTs while maintaining consistent phase-space structure. The identification of both electric and magnetic Carroll limits, together with the geometric interpretation of the deformed theories, would constitute a useful addition to the literature on symmetry deformations and ultra-relativistic limits.

major comments (2)

[Discussion of operator flow equations and Legendre invariance] The central claim that the flow-induced Legendre transformation between L and H remains form-invariant for all values of the deformation parameter, including at the symmetry-transition points, is load-bearing but only asserted rather than explicitly verified. When the dispersion relation changes from relativistic to ultra-relativistic, the definition of canonical momenta p = ∂L/∂φ̇ may cease to produce the same Hamiltonian via the standard Legendre map; the expansions of the actions in the extreme limits (mentioned in the abstract) do not substitute for a direct check of the transform at the transition loci.
[Symmetry analysis from configuration and phase space] The statement that the relativistic conformal algebra 'smoothly changes' to the Carrollian one is presented as a consequence of keeping the Legendre map unchanged, yet no explicit computation of the deformed Noether charges or the algebra generators is supplied to confirm the transition occurs precisely when the dispersion becomes ultra-relativistic.

minor comments (2)

The abstract would be clearer if it indicated the specific equations that define the operator flow and the precise location of the 'special points in the moduli space'.
A brief comparison of the newly identified magnetic Carroll limit with existing literature on Carrollian theories would help readers assess its novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the two major comments point by point below. Both points identify places where explicit calculations would strengthen the presentation, and we will incorporate these verifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim that the flow-induced Legendre transformation between L and H remains form-invariant for all values of the deformation parameter, including at the symmetry-transition points, is load-bearing but only asserted rather than explicitly verified. When the dispersion relation changes from relativistic to ultra-relativistic, the definition of canonical momenta p = ∂L/∂φ̇ may cease to produce the same Hamiltonian via the standard Legendre map; the expansions of the actions in the extreme limits (mentioned in the abstract) do not substitute for a direct check of the transform at the transition loci.

Authors: We agree that an explicit verification at the transition points is desirable. The flow equations are constructed so that the Legendre map is preserved identically for every value of the deformation parameter; this follows directly from the definition of the √(T T-bar) operator and the resulting differential equations for L and H. Nevertheless, to make the invariance manifest at the critical loci, the revised manuscript will contain a direct computation of the canonical momenta p = ∂L/∂φ̇ and the reconstructed Hamiltonian exactly at those parameter values where the dispersion becomes ultra-relativistic, confirming that the map retains its standard form. revision: yes
Referee: The statement that the relativistic conformal algebra 'smoothly changes' to the Carrollian one is presented as a consequence of keeping the Legendre map unchanged, yet no explicit computation of the deformed Noether charges or the algebra generators is supplied to confirm the transition occurs precisely when the dispersion becomes ultra-relativistic.

Authors: The manuscript derives the symmetry generators from the conserved currents in both the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations and shows that they deform continuously with the flow parameter. We acknowledge that explicit expressions for the deformed Noether charges and their algebra at the transition points would render the argument more transparent. In the revision we will supply these expressions, compute the Poisson brackets of the generators, and verify that the algebra closes into the Carrollian (BMS) form precisely when the dispersion relation reaches the ultra-relativistic limit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the claimed derivation

full rationale

The paper's central derivation applies standard operator flow equations for the marginal √(T T-bar) deformation, which induce a Legendre transformation between flowed Lagrangians and Hamiltonians that is explicitly kept invariant throughout the flow. This invariance permits consistent tracking of the symmetry transition from relativistic conformal algebra to Carrollian (BMS) one at special moduli points, examined from both configuration-space and phase-space viewpoints. Recovery of the Electric and Magnetic Carroll limits follows directly from expanding the deformed actions in the extreme flow-parameter regimes. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction, nor relies on self-citation chains or ansatzes smuggled via prior work; the framework remains self-contained under the stated dynamical assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of operator flow equations for the marginal deformation and the invariance of the Legendre transformation throughout the flow; these are treated as background assumptions rather than derived results.

free parameters (1)

deformation flow parameter
The continuous parameter that drives the marginal √(T T-bar) deformation and reaches special points where symmetries change.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Legendre transformation between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian remains unchanged under the deformation flow
Explicitly stated as keeping the notion of Legendre Transformation unchanged during the flow.
domain assumption The deformation is marginal and preserves conformal symmetries until special moduli points
Stated directly in the abstract as the condition under which the symmetry transition occurs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5461 in / 1444 out tokens · 59627 ms · 2026-05-16T11:56:30.934258+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean, Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean cost_alpha_one_eq_jcost, J_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

L_α = L cosh(α) + √(L²-P²) sinh(α); operator flow equations induce a Legendre Transformation between flowed Lagrangians and flowed Hamiltonians that remains unchanged during the entire flow
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BranchSelection.lean branch_selection, RCLCombiner_isCoupling_iff echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

the relativistic conformal algebra smoothly changes to the Carrollian conformal algebra at special points in the moduli space while keeping the notion of Legendre Transformation unchanged

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · 15 internal anchors

[1]

K. G. Wilson,The Renormalization Group: Critical Phenomena and the Kondo Problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.47(1975) 773

work page 1975
[2]

A. B. Zamolodchikov,Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,JETP Lett.43(1986) 730

work page 1986
[3]

F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,On space of integrable quantum field theories,Nucl. Phys. B915(2017) 363 [1608.05499]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[4]

$T \bar{T}$-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories

A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi and R. Tateo,T¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories, JHEP10(2016) 112 [1608.05534]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[5]

A. B. Zamolodchikov,Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,hep-th/0401146

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[6]

Jiang,A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory,Commun

Y. Jiang,A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory, Commun. Theor. Phys.73(2021) 057201 [1904.13376]

work page arXiv 2021
[7]

S. He, Y. Li, H. Ouyang and Y. Sun,TTdeformation: Introduction and some recent advances, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68(2025) 101001 [2503.09997]

work page arXiv 2025
[8]

$T\bar T$-deformations in closed form

G. Bonelli, N. Doroud and M. Zhu,T¯T-deformations in closed form,JHEP06(2018) 149 [1804.10967]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[9]

Datta and Y

S. Datta and Y. Jiang,t¯Tdeformed partition functions,Journal of High Energy Physics2018 (2018)

work page 2018
[10]

Dubovsky, V

S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and G. Hernández-Chifflet,tTpartition function from topological gravity,Journal of High Energy Physics2018(2018)

work page 2018
[11]

Aharony, S

O. Aharony, S. Datta, A. Giveon, Y. Jiang and D. Kutasov,Modular invariance and uniqueness ofT ¯Tdeformed CFT,Journal of High Energy Physics2019(2019)

work page 2019
[12]

The $\textrm{T}\bar{\textrm{T}}$ perturbation and its geometric interpretation

R. Conti, S. Negro and R. Tateo,TheTTperturbation and its geometric interpretation,JHEP 02(2019) 085 [1809.09593]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[13]

Chakraborty, A

S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,Entanglement beyond ads,Nuclear Physics B935(2018) 290–309

work page 2018
[14]

Holography Beyond AdS

M. Asrat, A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,Holography Beyond AdS,Nucl. Phys. B932 (2018) 241 [1711.02690]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[15]

Giveon, N

A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,TTand LST,JHEP07(2017) 122 [1701.05576]

work page arXiv 2017
[16]

Rodríguez, D

P. Rodríguez, D. Tempo and R. Troncoso,Mapping relativistic to ultra/non-relativistic conformal symmetries in 2D and finite √ TTdeformations,JHEP11(2021) 133 [2106.09750]

work page arXiv 2021
[17]

Ferko, A

C. Ferko, A. Sfondrini, L. Smith and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Root-T¯TDeformations in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 201604 [2206.10515]

work page arXiv 2022
[18]

Borsato, C

R. Borsato, C. Ferko and A. Sfondrini,Classical integrability of root-TT¯flows,Phys. Rev. D 107(2023) 086011 [2209.14274]

work page arXiv 2023
[19]

Ebert, C

S. Ebert, C. Ferko, C. L. Martin and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Flows in the space of interacting chiral boson theories,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 046005 [2403.18242]. – 50 –

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

Hadasz and R

L. Hadasz and R. von Unge,Defining the root-TT¯operator,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 045024 [2405.17945]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

He,Root-TTdeformed CFT partition functions at large central charge,JHEP11(2025) 146 [2505.12093]

M. He,Root-TTdeformed CFT partition functions at large central charge,JHEP11(2025) 146 [2505.12093]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Babaei-Aghbolagh, K

H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. Babaei Velni, D. Mahdavian Yekta and H. Mohammadzadeh, Marginal TT¯-like deformation and modified Maxwell theories in two dimensions,Phys. Rev. D 106(2022) 086022 [2206.12677]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

Conti, J

R. Conti, J. Romano and R. Tateo,Metric approach to aTT-like deformation in arbitrary dimensions,JHEP09(2022) 085 [2206.03415]

work page arXiv 2022
[24]

Bielli, C

D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Integrable higher-spin deformations of sigma models from auxiliary fields,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 066010 [2407.16338]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Bielli, C

D. Bielli, C. Ferko, M. Galli and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Higher-spin currents and flows in auxiliary field sigma models,JHEP08(2025) 078 [2504.17294]

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

Babaei-Aghbolagh, K

H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. Babaei Velni, D. M. Yekta and H. Mohammadzadeh,TT-like flows in non-linear electrodynamic theories and S-duality,JHEP04(2021) 187 [2012.13636]

work page arXiv 2021
[27]

Babaei-Aghbolagh, K

H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. Babaei Velni, D. M. Yekta and H. Mohammadzadeh,Manifestly SL(2, R) Duality-Symmetric Forms in ModMax Theory,JHEP12(2022) 147 [2210.13196]

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

Ferko, S

C. Ferko, S. M. Kuzenko, K. Lechner, D. P. Sorokin and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Interacting chiral form field theories andTT-like flows in six and higher dimensions,JHEP05(2024) 320 [2402.06947]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

S. M. Kuzenko,Interacting pp-form gauge theories: New developments,PoSQCHSC24(2025) 236 [2504.01421]

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

Hutomo, K

J. Hutomo, K. Lechner and D. P. Sorokin,On non-linear chiral 4-form theories in D=10, 2509.14351

work page arXiv
[31]

J. A. García and R. A. Sánchez-Isidro, √ TT-deformed oscillator inspired by ModMax,Eur. Phys. J. Plus138(2023) 114 [2209.06296]

work page arXiv 2023
[32]

Y.-Z. Li, Y. Xie and S. He,Emergent classical gravity as stress-tensor deformed field theories, 2508.15461

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[33]

Adami, M

H. Adami, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and V. Taghiloo,Gravity Is Induced By Renormalization Group Flow,2508.09633

work page arXiv
[34]

Babaei-Aghbolagh, S

H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, S. He, T. Morone, H. Ouyang and R. Tateo,Geometric Formulation of Generalized Root-TT¯Deformations,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 111602 [2405.03465]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

A Unified Causal Framework for Nonlinear Electrodynamics Black Hole from Courant-Hilbert Ap- proach: Thermodynamics and Singularity,

H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. Babaei Velni, S. He and F. Isapour,A Unified Causal Framework for Nonlinear Electrodynamics Black Hole from Courant-Hilbert Approach: Thermodynamics and Singularity,2511.17407

work page arXiv
[36]

Tsolakidis,Massive gravity generalization ofTTdeformations,JHEP09(2024) 167 [2405.07967]

E. Tsolakidis,Massive gravity generalization ofTTdeformations,JHEP09(2024) 167 [2405.07967]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

A non-linear duality- invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations,

I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin and P. K. Townsend,A non-linear duality-invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 121703 [2007.09092]. – 51 –

work page arXiv 2020
[38]

Babaei-Aghbolagh, K

H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. B. Velni, D. M. Yekta and H. Mohammadzadeh,Emergence of non-linear electrodynamic theories fromTT-like deformations,Phys. Lett. B829(2022) 137079 [2202.11156]

work page arXiv 2022
[39]

B. Chen, J. Hou and H. Sun,On self-dual Carrollian conformal nonlinear electrodynamics, JHEP08(2024) 160 [2405.04105]

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

Generalised Born-Infeld models, Lax operators and the $\textrm{T} \bar{\textrm{T}}$ perturbation

R. Conti, L. Iannella, S. Negro and R. Tateo,Generalised Born-Infeld models, Lax operators and theT Tperturbation,JHEP11(2018) 007 [1806.11515]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[41]

Sakamoto, R

J.-i. Sakamoto, R. Tateo and M. Yamazaki,TTand root-T Tdeformations in four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory,JHEP01(2026) 084 [2509.12303]

work page arXiv 2026
[42]

Babaei-Aghbolagh, B

H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, B. Chen and S. He,Integrable Sigma Models and Universal RootT¯T Deformation via Courant-Hilbert Approach,2509.17075

work page arXiv
[43]

X.-Y. Ran, F. Hao and H. Ouyang,Holography for stress-energy tensor flows,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) L081905 [2508.12275]

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

J. Tian, T. Lai and F. Omidi,Modular transformations of on-shell actions of (root-)Tt deformed holographic cfts,Nucl. Phys. B1007(2024) 116675 [2404.16354]

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

Ebert, C

S. Ebert, C. Ferko and Z. Sun,Root-TT¯deformed boundary conditions in holography,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 126022 [2304.08723]

work page arXiv 2023
[46]

Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry

C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons and P. A. Horvathy,Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry, Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 092001 [1402.5894]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[47]

Conformal Carroll groups

C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons and P. A. Horvathy,Conformal Carroll groups,J. Phys. A47(2014) 335204 [1403.4213]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[48]

N. D. Sen Gupta,On an analogue of the Galilei group,Nuovo Cim. A44(1966) 512

work page 1966
[49]

Lévy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré,Ann

J.-M. Lévy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A3(1965) 1

work page 1965
[50]

Henneaux,Geometry of Zero Signature Space-times,Bull

M. Henneaux,Geometry of Zero Signature Space-times,Bull. Soc. Math. Belg.31(1979) 47

work page 1979
[51]

Field Theories with Conformal Carrollian Symmetry

A. Bagchi, A. Mehra and P. Nandi,Field Theories with Conformal Carrollian Symmetry,JHEP 05(2019) 108 [1901.10147]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[52]

Henneaux and P

M. Henneaux and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories, JHEP11(2021) 180 [2109.06708]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

The Carrollian Kaleidoscope

A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal and A. Shukla,The Carrollian Kaleidoscope, 2506.16164

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[54]

Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162

K. Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162

work page arXiv
[55]

Donnay, A

L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 071602 [2202.04702]

work page arXiv 2022
[56]

Bagchi, S

A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu and S. Dutta,Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 241601 [2202.08438]

work page arXiv 2022
[57]

Donnay, A

L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 126027 [2212.12553]. – 52 –

work page arXiv 2023
[58]

Bagchi, P

A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar and S. Dutta,AdS Witten diagrams to Carrollian correlators,JHEP04 (2023) 135 [2303.07388]

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

Tempo and R

D. Tempo and R. Troncoso,Nonlinear automorphism of the conformal algebra in 2D and continuous √ TTdeformations,JHEP12(2022) 129 [2210.00059]

work page arXiv 2022
[60]

Bagchi, A

A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee and H. Muraki,Boosting to BMS,JHEP09(2022) 251 [2205.05094]

work page arXiv 2022
[61]

Bagchi, A

A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Mondal, D. Mukherjee and H. Muraki,Beyond Wilson? Carroll from current deformations,JHEP06(2024) 215 [2401.16482]

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

Classical and Quantized Tensionless Strings

J. Isberg, U. Lindstrom, B. Sundborg and G. Theodoridis,Classical and quantized tensionless strings,Nucl. Phys. B411(1994) 122 [hep-th/9307108]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[63]

Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra

A. Bagchi,Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra,JHEP05(2013) 141 [1303.0291]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[64]

Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries

A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty and P. Parekh,Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries, JHEP01(2016) 158 [1507.04361]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[65]

Bagchi, A

A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee and P. Parekh,Tensionless Path from Closed to Open Strings,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 111601 [1905.11732]

work page arXiv 2019
[66]

Bagchi, A

A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Chakrabortty, S. Dutta and P. Parekh,A tale of three — tensionless strings and vacuum structure,JHEP04(2020) 061 [2001.00354]

work page arXiv 2020
[67]

Bagchi, A

A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Chakrabortty and R. Chatterjee,A Rindler road to Carrollian worldsheets,JHEP04(2022) 082 [2111.01172]

work page arXiv 2022
[68]

de Boer, J

J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation,Front. in Phys.10(2022) 810405 [2110.02319]

work page arXiv 2022
[69]

Ferko, A

C. Ferko, A. Gupta and E. Iyer,Quantization of the ModMax oscillator,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 126021 [2310.06015]

work page arXiv 2023
[70]

Inonu and E

E. Inonu and E. P. Wigner,On the Contraction of groups and their represenations,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.39(1953) 510

work page 1953
[71]

Bagchi, A

A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Dutta, K. S. Kolekar and P. Sharma,Carroll covariant scalar fields in two dimensions,JHEP01(2023) 072 [2203.13197]

work page arXiv 2023
[72]

Bagchi, M

A. Bagchi, M. Mandlik and P. Sharma,Tensionless tales: vacua and critical dimensions,JHEP 08(2021) 054 [2105.09682]

work page arXiv 2021
[73]

Banerjee, R

A. Banerjee, R. Chatterjee and P. Pandit,Tensionless strings in a Kalb-Ramond background, JHEP06(2024) 067 [2404.01385]

work page arXiv 2024
[74]

Bagchi, P

A. Bagchi, P. Chakraborty, S. Chakrabortty, S. Fredenhagen, D. Grumiller and P. Pandit, Boundary Carrollian Conformal Field Theories and Open Null Strings,Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 071604 [2409.01094]

work page arXiv 2025
[75]

Parekh, D

P. Parekh, D. Tempo and R. Troncoso,BMS3 (Carrollian) field theories from a bound in the coupling of current-current deformations of CFT2,JHEP09(2023) 083 [2307.06367]

work page arXiv 2023
[76]

Bagchi, A

A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, R. Basu, M. Islam and S. Mondal,Magic fermions: Carroll and flat bands,JHEP03(2023) 227 [2211.11640]. – 53 –

work page arXiv 2023
[77]

Banerjee, S

A. Banerjee, S. Dutta and S. Mondal,Carroll fermions in two dimensions,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 125020 [2211.11639]

work page arXiv 2023
[78]

E. A. Bergshoeff, A. Campoleoni, A. Fontanella, L. Mele and J. Rosseel,Carroll fermions, SciPost Phys.16(2024) 153 [2312.00745]

work page arXiv 2024
[79]

Grumiller, L

D. Grumiller, L. Mele and L. Montecchio,Carroll spinors,2509.19426

work page arXiv
[80]

D. J. Gross, J. Kruthoff, A. Rolph and E. Shaghoulian,TTin AdS 2 and Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 026011 [1907.04873]. – 54 –

work page arXiv 2020