pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.06696 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-06 · ⚛️ nucl-th · astro-ph.HE· hep-ph· hep-th· nucl-ex

Recognition: no theorem link

Bayesian Constraints on the Neutron Star Equation of State with a Smooth Hadron-Quark Crossover

Xavier Grundler , Bao-An Li
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th astro-ph.HEhep-phhep-thnucl-ex
keywords Bayesian inferenceneutron star equation of statehadron-quark crossovernuclear symmetry energygravitational wavesNICERtrace anomaly
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bayesian analysis of neutron star data constrains the slope and curvature of nuclear symmetry energy but leaves high-density quark parameters weakly determined.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts a Bayesian inference on the neutron star equation of state by modeling hadronic matter, quark matter, and a smooth crossover between them within one framework. It uses gravitational-wave signals from GW170817, NICER mass-radius measurements, and consistency conditions to update the parameters. The resulting ensemble shows that current data tightly limits the density dependence of nuclear symmetry energy, especially its slope and curvature. In contrast, the highest-density hadronic parameters and the properties of quark matter stay only loosely constrained. The trace anomaly across the accepted models displays nearly universal behavior, indicating that present observations mainly probe lower to intermediate densities.

Core claim

Within a single Bayesian statistical framework that simultaneously infers hadronic, crossover, and quark parameters, current neutron-star observations strongly constrain the slope and curvature of the nuclear symmetry energy while leaving the highest-density hadronic parameters and quark-matter properties only weakly constrained. The trace anomaly exhibits remarkably universal behavior that is largely insensitive to the observational constraints, showing that existing data primarily probe the low-to-intermediate density regime.

What carries the argument

Bayesian inference applied to a unified equation-of-state model containing hadronic matter, a smooth hadron-quark crossover, and quark matter, with parameters updated by gravitational-wave and X-ray radius data.

If this is right

  • The slope and curvature parameters of nuclear symmetry energy are now fixed over a wide density range by existing data.
  • Quark-matter properties at the highest densities remain largely free parameters until new observables arrive.
  • The universal behavior of the trace anomaly across models implies that current constraints do not yet reach the regime where quark degrees of freedom dominate.
  • Next-generation radius measurements or complementary high-density observables will be required to tighten quark-matter parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the smooth-crossover assumption holds, the same framework can be used to forecast how future radius precision will reduce uncertainties on quark parameters.
  • The universality of the trace anomaly suggests that similar behavior may appear in other dense-matter observables not yet measured.
  • Models that assume a sharp first-order transition can be compared directly against this ensemble to test whether the crossover description changes the inferred symmetry-energy constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that a smooth hadron-to-quark crossover accurately represents the transition and that the chosen parameterization plus priors permit simultaneous inference of all parameters without strong biases.

What would settle it

A future high-precision neutron-star radius measurement that lies outside the narrow range allowed by the current posterior ensemble would show that the constraints on symmetry-energy parameters are not robust.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.06696 by Bao-An Li, Xavier Grundler.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: PDFs of the HM parameters. pact on MTOV, as overly soft EOSs are excluded by the maximum-mass filter. In the bottom two panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: PDFs of the QM parameters. crossover region spanning ∼ 550–950 MeV/fm3 . B. Typical Global Observables In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Using the NICER-informed likelihood, we see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The speed of sound squared and trace anomaly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Posterior probability distributions for NS observ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of pairwise correlation between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The same as in Fig. 5 but now the count in each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: On the left is the probability distribution for the maximum speed of sound squared, Max( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The PDFs of observables, parameters, and NS interiors that differed significantly depending on the NICER data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform a Bayesian inference of the dense-matter equation of state (EOS) within a unified framework that incorporates hadronic matter, quark matter, and a smooth hadron-to-quark crossover. The EOS is constrained using physical consistency conditions, gravitational wave data from GW170817, NICER mass versus radius measurements, and hypothetical future high-precision radius observations. In contrast to most previous studies that assume a sharp first-order phase transition or fix part of the EOS, we simultaneously infer hadronic, quark, and crossover parameters within a single statistical framework. We find that current observations strongly constrain the density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy, particularly its slope and curvature. In contrast, the highest density hadronic parameters and quark-matter properties remain only weakly constrained. We further show that the trace anomaly exhibits a remarkably universal behavior across the accepted EOS ensemble and remains largely insensitive to current observational constraints. This indicates that the present data primarily probe the low to intermediate density EOS. At the same time, robust inference of quark matter and genuinely high-density physics will require next-generation precision radius measurements or complementary observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a Bayesian inference of the neutron star equation of state using a unified parameterization that includes hadronic matter, a smooth hadron-to-quark crossover, and quark matter. The EOS is constrained by physical consistency conditions, GW170817 tidal deformability data, NICER mass-radius measurements, and hypothetical future high-precision radius observations. The central results are that current data strongly constrain the slope and curvature of the nuclear symmetry energy while leaving highest-density hadronic parameters and quark-matter properties only weakly constrained, and that the trace anomaly exhibits universal behavior across the posterior ensemble that is largely insensitive to the observational constraints.

Significance. If the results hold, the work demonstrates the value of a single statistical framework that simultaneously varies hadronic, crossover, and quark parameters without fixing segments of the EOS or assuming a sharp first-order transition. The differential constraining power—strong on symmetry-energy parameters at moderate densities but weak on high-density quark matter—directly follows from the limited density reach of existing GW and NICER data and is therefore a useful guide for prioritizing next-generation radius measurements. The reported universality of the trace anomaly is a concrete, falsifiable prediction that can be tested with future data or lattice QCD input.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §2] The abstract states that priors, parameterization details, and error treatment are not fully specified; the main text should include an explicit table or subsection listing all free parameters, their prior ranges, and the precise form of the likelihood function to allow independent reproduction.
  2. [Figures 3–5] Figure captions and axis labels for the posterior distributions of symmetry-energy parameters (slope and curvature) should explicitly state the 68 % and 90 % credible intervals so that the strength of the reported constraints can be read directly from the plots.
  3. [§4.3] The discussion of the trace-anomaly universality would benefit from a quantitative measure (e.g., the standard deviation across the ensemble at a fixed density) rather than a purely qualitative statement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and accurate assessment of our manuscript, including the recognition of the unified Bayesian framework and the implications of our results for current and future observations. We address the referee summary below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The manuscript presents a Bayesian inference of the neutron star equation of state using a unified parameterization that includes hadronic matter, a smooth hadron-to-quark crossover, and quark matter. The EOS is constrained by physical consistency conditions, GW170817 tidal deformability data, NICER mass-radius measurements, and hypothetical future high-precision radius observations. The central results are that current data strongly constrain the slope and curvature of the nuclear symmetry energy while leaving highest-density hadronic parameters and quark-matter properties only weakly constrained, and that the trace anomaly exhibits universal behavior across the posterior ensemble that is largely insensitive to the observational constraints.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's concise and accurate summary of the work. The description correctly reflects our unified parameterization and the key finding that existing GW170817 and NICER data primarily constrain the symmetry-energy parameters at moderate densities while leaving the highest-density hadronic and quark-matter sectors only weakly constrained. This differential sensitivity is a direct consequence of the limited density reach of the current observations, as emphasized in the manuscript. revision: no

  2. Referee: If the results hold, the work demonstrates the value of a single statistical framework that simultaneously varies hadronic, crossover, and quark parameters without fixing segments of the EOS or assuming a sharp first-order transition. The differential constraining power—strong on symmetry-energy parameters at moderate densities but weak on high-density quark matter—directly follows from the limited density reach of existing GW and NICER data and is therefore a useful guide for prioritizing next-generation radius measurements. The reported universality of the trace anomaly is a concrete, falsifiable prediction that can be tested with future data or lattice QCD input.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the unified framework is a central strength of the study and that the results highlight the need for higher-precision radius measurements to constrain quark-matter properties. The universality of the trace anomaly across the posterior is presented as a robust, observationally insensitive feature that can indeed serve as a testable prediction for future work. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; inference driven by external data

full rationale

The paper conducts Bayesian inference of the EOS parameters using external constraints (GW170817 tidal deformability, NICER mass-radius data, and physical consistency conditions) as the likelihood. The reported strong constraints on symmetry-energy slope/curvature and weak constraints on high-density hadronic and quark parameters follow directly from the density reach of those observations and the parameterization's design to allow independent high-density variation. No equation reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and the trace-anomaly universality is a stated consequence of the functional form once low-density data are imposed. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a parameterized EOS model whose hadronic symmetry-energy terms, crossover function, and quark-matter coefficients are treated as free parameters updated by Bayesian inference against external data; the smooth-crossover assumption is adopted without independent derivation.

free parameters (4)
  • slope of nuclear symmetry energy
    Density dependence parameter inferred from data
  • curvature of nuclear symmetry energy
    Density dependence parameter inferred from data
  • highest-density hadronic parameters
    Weakly constrained by current data
  • quark-matter parameters
    Weakly constrained by current data
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Smooth hadron-quark crossover provides a valid unified description of the EOS
    Adopted as the modeling framework in contrast to sharp first-order transitions
  • domain assumption Physical consistency conditions (causality, stability) must be satisfied by the EOS
    Used to restrict the parameter space

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5500 in / 1411 out tokens · 32459 ms · 2026-05-16T06:36:35.441279+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 109 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Here,ρdenotes the baryon number density andδ= (ρ n −ρ p)/ρis the isospin asymmetry, withρ n andρ p being the neutron and pro- ton densities, respectively

    HM EOS The HM meta-model is based on a parameterization of the binding energy per nucleon ofβ-equilibratednpeµ matter, E(ρ, δ) =E 0(ρ) +E sym(ρ)δ 2 +O(δ 4),(1) where we adopt the empirical isospin-parabolic approxi- mation for neutron-rich matter [52]. Here,ρdenotes the baryon number density andδ= (ρ n −ρ p)/ρis the isospin asymmetry, withρ n andρ p being...

    work page

  2. [2]

    [54], which does not assume a specific microscopic composition of quark matter, such as the presence or absence of strange quarks

    QM EOS For the QM meta-model, we adopt thep1parameter- ization introduced in Ref. [54], which does not assume a specific microscopic composition of quark matter, such as the presence or absence of strange quarks. This param- eterization is formulated in terms of the trace anomaly [20], ∆≡ 1 3 − P ε .(10) Following Ref. [54], we parameterize ∆(ε) as ∆ = 1 ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    smooth crossover

    Crossover Region In contrast to much of our previous work, we employ a smooth crossover, rather than a sharp first-order phase transition, to connect the HM and QM EOSs. A vari- ety of interpolation schemes have been proposed in the literature. Common approaches include polynomial in- terpolations in chemical potentialµ[27, 29, 30, 61–64], piecewise-polyn...

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    All NICER

    The NICER measurements with the smallest re- ported errors summarized in Table II. 4.R 1.4 = 11.9±0.2 km, corresponding to a hypotheti- cal future measurement with significantly improved precision using third-generation gravitational wave detectors [87–91]. For PSR J0740+6620, PSR J0030+0451, and PSR J0437+4715, multiple NICER analyses exist based on dif-...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Bogdanov, et al., inSnowmass 2021, Snowmass 2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: The Dense Matter Equation of State and QCD Phase Transitions

    S. Bogdanov, et al., inSnowmass 2021, Snowmass 2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: The Dense Matter Equation of State and QCD Phase Transitions. 2022. arXiv:2209.07412

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Sorensen, et al., Dense nuclear matter equa- tion of state from heavy-ion collisions

    A. Sorensen, et al., Dense nuclear matter equa- tion of state from heavy-ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.134, 104080 (2024). arXiv:2301.13253, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104080

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104080 2024

  7. [7]

    Fukushima, QCD phase diagram and astrophysical implications

    K. Fukushima, QCD phase diagram and astrophysical implications. J. Subat. Part. Cosmol.3, 100066 (2025). arXiv:2501.01907, doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100066

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100066 2025

  8. [8]

    Ecker, N

    C. Ecker, N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen, Locating the QCD 13 critical point with neutron-star observations. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2506.10065 (2025). arXiv:2506.10065, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.10065

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.10065 2025

  9. [9]

    The presence of a critical end point in the QCD phase diagram from the net-baryon number fluctuations

    M. Ferreira, P. Costa, C. Providˆ encia, Presence of a critical endpoint in the QCD phase di- agram from the net-baryon number fluctuations. Phys. Rev. D98, 034006 (2018). arXiv:1806.05757, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.034006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.034006 2018

  10. [10]

    Stephanov, QCD critical point: Recent de- velopments

    M. Stephanov, QCD critical point: Recent de- velopments. EPJ Web Conf.314, 00042 (2024). arXiv:2410.02861, doi:10.1051/epjconf/202431400042

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202431400042 2024

  11. [11]

    Multiple Critical Points in Effective Quark Models

    L. Ferroni, V. Koch, M.B. Pinto, Multiple Crit- ical Points in Effective Quark Models. Phys. Rev. C82, 055205 (2010). arXiv:1007.4721, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.82.055205

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.82.055205 2010

  12. [12]

    Mass-radius constraints for compact stars and a critical endpoint

    D. Blaschke, D.E. Alvarez-Castillo, S. Benic, Mass- radius constraints for compact stars and a criti- cal endpoint. Proc. Sci.CPOD2013, 063 (2013). arXiv:1310.3803, doi:10.22323/1.185.0063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.185.0063 2013

  13. [13]

    L. Du, A. Sorensen, M. Stephanov, The QCD phase diagram and Beam Energy Scan physics: A theory overview. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33, 2430008 (2024). arXiv:2402.10183, doi:10.1142/9789811294679 0007

    work page doi:10.1142/9789811294679 2024

  14. [14]

    Lattimer, Constraints on Nuclear Symme- try Energy Parameters

    J.M. Lattimer, Constraints on Nuclear Symme- try Energy Parameters. Part.6, 30–56 (2023). arXiv:2301.03666, doi:10.3390/particles6010003

    work page doi:10.3390/particles6010003 2023

  15. [15]

    Tolman, Static solutions of Einstein’s field equa- tions for spheres of fluid

    R.C. Tolman, Static solutions of Einstein’s field equa- tions for spheres of fluid. Phys. Rev.55, 364–373 (1939). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.364

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.55.364 1939

  16. [16]

    Oppenheimer, G.M

    J.R. Oppenheimer, G.M. Volkoff, On massive neutron cores. Phys. Rev.55, 374–381 (1939). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.374

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.55.374 1939

  17. [17]

    Brandes, W

    L. Brandes, W. Weise, Constraints on Phase Transi- tions in Neutron Star Matter. Symmetry16, 111 (2024). arXiv:2312.11937, doi:10.3390/sym16010111

    work page doi:10.3390/sym16010111 2024

  18. [18]

    Alarc´ on, E

    J.M. Alarc´ on, E. Lope-Oter, Y. Cano, Effec- tive field theories for neutron stars physics. Eur. Phys. J. Special Top. (2025). arXiv:2511.04737, doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-02026-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-02026-8 2025

  19. [19]

    Brandes, W

    L. Brandes, W. Weise, N. Kaiser, Evidence against a strong first-order phase transition in neutron star cores: Impact of new data. Phys. Rev. D108, 094014 (2023). arXiv:2306.06218, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.094014

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.094014 2023

  20. [20]

    D.G. Roy, A. Venneti, T. Malik, et al., Bayesian evalua- tion of hadron-quark phase transition models through neutron star observables in light of nuclear and as- trophysics data. Phys. Lett. B859, 139128 (2024). arXiv:2411.08440, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139128

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139128 2024

  21. [21]

    Constantinou, S

    C. Constantinou, S. Han, P. Jaikumar, et al., g modes of neutron stars with hadron-to-quark crossover transitions. Phys. Rev. D104, 123032 (2021). arXiv:2109.14091, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123032

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123032 2021

  22. [22]

    Pradhan, D

    B.K. Pradhan, D. Chatterjee, D.E. Alvarez-Castillo, Probing hadron–quark phase transition in twin stars usingf-modes. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.531, 4640–4655 (2024). arXiv:2309.08775, doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1425

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1425 2024

  23. [23]

    Sotani, T

    H. Sotani, T. Kojo, Universality in quasinormal modes of neutron stars with quark-hadron crossover. Phys. Rev. D108, 063004 (2023). arXiv:2308.11494, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.063004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.063004 2023

  24. [24]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, K. Hotokezaka, et al., Signature of hadron-quark crossover in binary-neutron- star mergers. Phys. Rev. D111, 063054 (2025). arXiv:2408.10298, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063054

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.063054 2025

  25. [25]

    The role of strangeness in hybrid stars and possible observables

    V. Dexheimer, R. Negreiros, S. Schramm, Role of strangeness in hybrid stars and possible observables. Phys. Rev. C91, 055808 (2015). arXiv:1411.4623, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.055808

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.055808 2015

  26. [26]

    Tajima, K

    H. Tajima, K. Iida, T. Kojo, et al., Tripling Fluctu- ations and Peaked Sound Speed in Fermionic Matter. Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 042701 (2025). arXiv:2412.04971, doi:10.1103/4ywp-752m

    work page doi:10.1103/4ywp-752m 2025

  27. [27]

    K. Iida, E. Itou, Velocity of sound beyond the high- density relativistic limit from lattice simulation of dense two-color QCD. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2022, 111B01 (2022). arXiv:2207.01253, doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac137

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac137 2022

  28. [28]

    Robustness of third family solutions for hybrid stars against mixed phase effects

    A. Ayriyan, N.U. Bastian, D. Blaschke, et al., Robust- ness of third family solutions for hybrid stars against mixed phase effects. Phys. Rev. C97, 045802 (2018). arXiv:1711.03926, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.045802

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.045802 2018

  29. [29]

    Two novel approaches to the hadron-quark mixed phase in compact stars

    V. Abgaryan, D. Alvarez-Castillo, A. Ayriyan, et al., Two Novel Approaches to the Hadron-Quark Mixed Phase in Compact Stars. Universe4, 94 (2018). arXiv:1807.08034, doi:10.3390/universe4090094

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3390/universe4090094 2018

  30. [30]

    Mixed phase effects on high-mass twin stars

    D.E. Alvarez-Castillo, D. Blaschke, Mixed phase effects on high-mass twin stars. Phys. Part. Nucl.46, 846–848 (2015). arXiv:1412.8463, doi:10.1134/S1063779615050032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1134/s1063779615050032 2015

  31. [31]

    Blaschke, A

    D. Blaschke, A. Ayriyan, D.E. Alvarez-Castillo, et al., Was GW170817 a Canonical Neutron Star Merger? Bayesian Analysis with a Third Family of Com- pact Stars. Universe6, 81 (2020). arXiv:2005.02759, doi:10.3390/universe6060081

    work page doi:10.3390/universe6060081 2020

  32. [32]

    Hadron-Quark Crossover and Massive Hybrid Stars

    K. Masuda, T. Hatsuda, T. Takatsuka, Hadron–quark crossover and massive hybrid stars. PTEP2013, 073D01 (2013). arXiv:1212.6803, doi:10.1093/ptep/ptt045

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/ptep/ptt045 2013

  33. [33]

    Phenomenological QCD equation of state for massive neutron stars

    T. Kojo, P.D. Powell, Y. Song, et al., Phenomeno- logical QCD equation of state for massive neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D91, 045003 (2015). arXiv:1412.1108, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.045003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.045003 2015

  34. [34]

    Takatsy, P

    J. Takatsy, P. Kovacs, G. Wolf, et al., What neu- tron stars tell about the hadron-quark phase transition: A Bayesian study. Phys. Rev. D108, 043002 (2023). arXiv:2303.00013, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.043002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.043002 2023

  35. [35]

    Quarkyonic Matter and Neutron Stars

    L. McLerran, S. Reddy, Quarkyonic Mat- ter and Neutron Stars. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 122701 (2019). arXiv:1811.12503, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.122701

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.122701 2019

  36. [36]

    McLerran, A Pedagogical Discussion of Quarky- onic Matter and Its Implication for Neutron Stars

    L. McLerran, A Pedagogical Discussion of Quarky- onic Matter and Its Implication for Neutron Stars. Acta Phys. Polon. B51, 1067–1077 (2020). doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.51.1067

    work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.51.1067 2020

  37. [37]

    Zhang, B.A

    N.B. Zhang, B.A. Li, J. Xu, Combined constraints on the equation of state of dense neutron-rich matter from terrestrial nuclear experiments and observations of neutron stars. The Astrophys. J.859, 90 (2018). doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac027

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac027 2018

  38. [38]

    Implications of the mass $M=2.17^{+0.11}_{-0.10}$M$_\odot$ of PSR~J0740+6620 on the Equation of State of Super-Dense Neutron-Rich Nuclear Matter

    N.B. Zhang, B.A. Li, Implications of the massM= 2.17+0.11 −0.10M⊙ of PSR J0740+6620 on the equation of state of super-dense neutron-rich nuclear mat- ter. Astrophys. J.879, 99 (2019). arXiv:1904.10998, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab24cb

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab24cb 2019

  39. [40]

    Xie, B.A

    W.J. Xie, B.A. Li, Bayesian inference of high-density nuclear symmetry energy from radii of canonical neutron stars. The Astrophys. J.883, 174 (2019). doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3f37

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3f37 2019

  40. [42]

    Xie, B.A

    W.J. Xie, B.A. Li, Bayesian inference of the dense-matter equation of state encapsulating a first-order hadron-quark phase transition from observables of canonical neutron stars. Phys. Rev. C103, 035802 (2021). arXiv:2009.13653, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.035802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.035802 2021

  41. [43]

    Zhang, B.A

    N.B. Zhang, B.A. Li, Properties of first-order hadron- quark phase transition from inverting neutron star observables. Phys. Rev. C108, 025803 (2023). arXiv:2304.07381, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.025803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.025803 2023

  42. [44]

    Zhang, B.A

    N.B. Zhang, B.A. Li, Impact of the nuclear equation of state on the formation of twin stars. Eur. Phys. J. A61, 31 (2025). arXiv:2406.07396, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050- 025-01497-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050- 2025

  43. [45]

    Xie, B.A

    W.J. Xie, B.A. Li, N.B. Zhang, Impact of the newly re- vised gravitational redshift of x-ray burster GS 1826-24 on the equation of state of supradense neutron-rich mat- ter. Phys. Rev. D110, 043025 (2024). arXiv:2404.01989, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.043025

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.043025 2024

  44. [46]

    B.A. Li, X. Grundler, W.J. Xie, et al., Bayesian in- ference of fine features of the nuclear equation of state from future neutron star radius measurements to 0.1 km accuracy. Phys. Rev. D110, 103040 (2024). arXiv:2407.07823, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103040

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.103040 2024

  45. [47]

    B.A. Li, P.G. Krastev, D.H. Wen, et al., Towards Understanding Astrophysical Effects of Nuclear Sym- metry Energy. Eur. Phys. J. A55, 117 (2019). arXiv:1905.13175, doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12780-8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12780-8 2019

  46. [48]

    B.A. Li, B.J. Cai, W.J. Xie, et al., Progress in Con- straining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Using Neutron Star Observables Since GW170817. Universe7, 182 (2021). arXiv:2105.04629, doi:10.3390/universe7060182

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7060182 2021

  47. [49]

    B.A. Li, X. Grundler, W.J. Xie, et al., Bayesian In- ference of Hybrid Star Properties from Future High- precision Measurements of Their Radii. Astrophys. J. 998, 262 (2026). arXiv:2505.00194, doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/ae38c0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538- 2026

  48. [50]

    Grundler, B.A

    X. Grundler, B.A. Li, Bayesian quantification of observability and equation of state of twin stars. Phys. Rev. D112, 103012 (2025). arXiv:2506.13677, doi:10.1103/hsd4-j54y

    work page doi:10.1103/hsd4-j54y 2025

  49. [51]

    Negele, D

    J.W. Negele, D. Vautherin, Neutron star matter at sub- nuclear densities. Nucl. Phys. A207, 298–320 (1973). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(73)90349-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(73)90349-7 1973

  50. [52]

    G. Baym, C. Pethick, P. Sutherland, The ground state of matter at high densities: equation of state and stellar models. The Astrophys. J.170, 299 (1971). doi:10.1086/151216

    work page doi:10.1086/151216 1971

  51. [53]

    Lattimer, M

    J. Lattimer, M. Prakash, Neutron star obser- vations: Prognosis for equation of state con- straints. Phys. Reports442, 109–165 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.003 2007

  52. [54]

    Kubis, Nuclear symmetry energy and stability of mat- ter in neutron stars

    S. Kubis, Nuclear symmetry energy and stability of mat- ter in neutron stars. Phys. Rev. C76, 025801 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.025801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.76.025801 2007

  53. [55]

    J. Xu, L.W. Chen, B.A. Li, et al., Nuclear constraints on properties of neutron star crusts. The Astrophys. J.697, 1549–1568 (2009). doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1549

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1549 2009

  54. [56]

    Bombaci, U

    I. Bombaci, U. Lombardo, Asymmetric nuclear mat- ter equation of state. Phys. Rev. C44, 1892 (1991). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.44.1892

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.44.1892 1991

  55. [57]

    B.A. Li, A. Ramos, G. Verde, et al., Topical issue on nuclear symmetry energy. Eur. Phys. J. A50, 9 (2014). doi:10.1140/epja/i2014-14009-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2014-14009-x 2014

  56. [58]

    Cai, B.A

    B.J. Cai, B.A. Li, Unraveling trace anomaly of supradense matter via neutron star compact- ness scaling. Phys. Rev. D112, 023023 (2025). arXiv:2406.05025, doi:10.1103/3p2p-p3d4

    work page doi:10.1103/3p2p-p3d4 2025

  57. [59]

    Somasundaram, I

    R. Somasundaram, I. Tews, J. Margueron, Pertur- bative QCD and the neutron star equation of state. Phys. Rev. C107, L052801 (2023). arXiv:2204.14039, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.L052801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.l052801 2023

  58. [60]

    Zhou, Reexamining constraints on neutron star properties from perturbative QCD

    D. Zhou, Reexamining constraints on neutron star properties from perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. C111, 015810 (2025). arXiv:2307.11125, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.111.015810

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.111.015810 2025

  59. [61]

    Sound velocity bound and neutron stars

    P. Bedaque, A.W. Steiner, Sound velocity bound and neutron stars. Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 031103 (2015). arXiv:1408.5116, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.031103

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.031103 2015

  60. [63]

    Cai, B.A

    B.J. Cai, B.A. Li, Z. Zhang, Central speed of sound, the trace anomaly, and observables of neutron stars from a perturbative analysis of scaled Tolman-Oppenheimer- Volkoff equations. Phys. Rev. D108, 103041 (2023). arXiv:2307.15223, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.103041

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.103041 2023

  61. [64]

    Cai, B.A

    B.J. Cai, B.A. Li, Strong gravity extruding peaks in speed of sound profiles of massive neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D109, 083015 (2024). arXiv:2311.13037, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.083015 2024

  62. [65]

    G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, et al., From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review. Rept. Prog. Phys. 81, 056902 (2018). arXiv:1707.04966, doi:10.1088/1361- 6633/aaae14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361- 2018

  63. [66]

    G. Baym, S. Furusawa, T. Hatsuda, et al., New Neutron Star Equation of State with Quark-Hadron Crossover. Astrophys. J.885, 42 (2019). arXiv:1903.08963, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab441e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab441e 2019

  64. [67]

    T. Kojo, G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, Implications of NICER for Neutron Star Matter: The QHC21 Equation of State. Astrophys. J.934, 46 (2022). arXiv:2111.11919, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7876

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7876 2022

  65. [68]

    Minamikawa, T

    T. Minamikawa, T. Kojo, M. Harada, Quark-hadron crossover equations of state for neutron stars: constrain- ing the chiral invariant mass in a parity doublet model. Phys. Rev. C103, 045205 (2021). arXiv:2011.13684, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.045205

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.045205 2021

  66. [69]

    Ayriyan, D

    A. Ayriyan, D. Blaschke, A.G. Grunfeld, et al., Bayesian analysis of multimessenger M-R data with interpo- lated hybrid EoS. Eur. Phys. J. A57, 318 (2021). arXiv:2102.13485, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00619- 0

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00619- 2021

  67. [70]

    Lavagno, Hadron-quark crossover phase transition in hybrid compact stars

    A. Lavagno, Hadron-quark crossover phase transition in hybrid compact stars. Proc. Sci.QNP2024, 163 (2025). doi:10.22323/1.465.0163

    work page doi:10.22323/1.465.0163 2025

  68. [71]

    Kapusta, T

    J.I. Kapusta, T. Welle, Neutron stars with a crossover equation of state. Phys. Rev. C104, L012801 (2021). 15 arXiv:2103.16633, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.L012801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.l012801 2021

  69. [72]

    Blaschke, E.O

    D. Blaschke, E.O. Hanu, S. Liebing, Neutron stars with crossover to color superconducting quark matter. Phys. Rev. C105, 035804 (2022). arXiv:2112.12145, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.035804

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.035804 2022

  70. [73]

    T. Hell, W. Weise, Dense baryonic matter: con- straints from recent neutron star observations. Phys. Rev. C90, 045801 (2014). arXiv:1402.4098, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.045801

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.90.045801 2014

  71. [74]

    Y. Yang, C. Wu, J.F. Yang, Effects of a phase transition in hybrid stars from quark-meson cou- pling hadronic matter to deconfined quark matter. Phys. Rev. D109, 063008 (2024). arXiv:2312.08758, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.063008 2024

  72. [75]

    P. Qin, Z. Bai, S. Wang, et al., Hadron-quark phase transition in neutron star by combining the relativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock theory and Dyson-Schwinger equation approach. Phys. Rev. D107, 103009 (2023). arXiv:2301.02768, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.103009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.103009 2023

  73. [76]

    Kov´ acs, J

    P. Kov´ acs, J. Tak´ atsy, J. Schaffner-Bielich, et al., Neutron star properties with careful parametrization in the vector and axial-vector meson extended lin- ear sigma model. Phys. Rev. D105, 103014 (2022). arXiv:2111.06127, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103014

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.103014 2022

  74. [77]

    Salmi, et al., The Radius of the High-mass Pul- sar PSR J0740+6620 with 3.6 yr of NICER Data

    T. Salmi, et al., The Radius of the High-mass Pul- sar PSR J0740+6620 with 3.6 yr of NICER Data. Astrophys. J.974, 294 (2024). arXiv:2406.14466, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f1f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f1f 2024

  75. [78]

    Salmi, D

    T. Salmi, D. Choudhury, Y. Kini, et al., Data and Soft- ware for: ’The Radius of the High- mass Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 with 3.6 yr of NICER Data’ . (Jun. 2024). doi:10.5281/zenodo.10519473

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10519473 2024

  76. [79]

    Vinciguerra, et al., An Updated Mass–Radius Analysis of the 2017–2018 NICER Data Set of PSR J0030+0451

    S. Vinciguerra, et al., An Updated Mass–Radius Analysis of the 2017–2018 NICER Data Set of PSR J0030+0451. Astrophys. J.961, 62 (2024). arXiv:2308.09469, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfb83

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfb83 2017

  77. [80]

    Vinciguerra, T

    S. Vinciguerra, T. Salmi, A.L. Watts, et al., An updated mass-radius analysis of the 2017-2018 NICER data set of PSR J0030+0451 . (Nov. 2023). doi:10.5281/zenodo.8239000

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8239000 2017

  78. [81]

    Choudhury, et al., A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715

    D. Choudhury, et al., A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715. As- trophys. J. Lett.971, L20 (2024). arXiv:2407.06789, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5a6f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5a6f 2024

  79. [82]

    Choudhury, T

    D. Choudhury, T. Salmi, S. Vinciguerra, et al., Repro- duction package for: ’A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715’ . (Aug. 2024). doi:10.5281/zenodo.13766753

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.13766753 2024

  80. [83]

    Mauviard, S

    L. Mauviard, S. Guillot, T. Salmi, et al., A NICER view of the 1.4 solar-mass edge-on pulsar PSR J0614–3329. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2506.14883 (2025). arXiv:2506.14883, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.14883

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.14883 2025

Showing first 80 references.