arxiv: 2602.10215 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-10 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Gravitational scalar production with a generic reheating scenario

Francesco Costa , Jinsu Kim

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 02:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO

keywords gravitational productionreheating scenariospower-law inflatonnon-thermal dark matterrelic dilutionscalar fieldsquantum gravity operators

0 comments

The pith

Extended reheating dilutes gravitationally produced scalar relics for inflaton potentials with k less than 4, preserving non-thermal dark matter predictivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines gravitational production of fully decoupled scalars during inflation and the post-inflationary era across different reheating histories. For an inflaton potential scaling as phi to the power k with k below 4 and low reheating temperatures, the prolonged reheating stage reduces the final density of these gravitationally created particles. This dilution effect means universal gravity contributions do not automatically ruin the ability to predict dark matter abundance in non-thermal scenarios. Constraints on the scalar self-coupling, mass, and quantum gravity operators shift strongly depending on whether reheating enhances or suppresses the relics. In multi-stage reheating the net dilution or enhancement multiplies across successive phases.

Core claim

Our analysis demonstrates that universal gravity effects do not necessarily spoil the predictivity of non-thermal dark matter scenarios with k < 4 and low reheating temperatures, as an extended reheating phase dilutes gravitationally-produced relics. For k > 4, on the other hand, the relic abundance is enhanced during the reheating phase, leading to stringent constraints on the scalar. In multi-stage reheating, we show that the enhancement/dilution effect of subsequent reheating phases factorises.

What carries the argument

The reheating phase controlled by the inflaton potential V_inf proportional to phi^k, which sets whether gravitationally produced scalar relics are diluted or enhanced.

If this is right

For k < 4 the relic density drops during reheating, relaxing upper limits on scalar mass and self-coupling.
For k > 4 the relic density grows during reheating, producing tighter upper bounds on the same parameters.
Multi-stage reheating allows the overall suppression or enhancement to be computed as the product of each individual stage.
Bounds on coefficients of quantum gravity-induced operators inherit the same sensitive dependence on reheating dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Model builders could select a specific reheating history with k below 4 to accommodate heavier or more strongly self-interacting scalars as viable dark matter.
The factorization result suggests a modular way to combine constraints from different post-inflationary epochs when studying other gravitationally produced species.
Future measurements of dark matter properties might indirectly limit the allowed range of the inflaton equation-of-state parameter during reheating.

Load-bearing premise

The scalars interact only gravitationally with the inflaton and radiation bath, and reheating follows a pure power-law inflaton potential without extra decay channels.

What would settle it

A precise calculation of the final scalar relic density for a chosen k=3 potential and low reheating temperature that either matches or grossly exceeds the observed dark matter density while satisfying all other bounds.

read the original abstract

Gravitational production of decoupled scalars during inflationary and post-inflationary phases is efficient and can lead to over-production. We study this production with various reheating scenarios such as a generic power-law inflaton potential $V_{\rm inf}\propto \phi^k$ as well as a multi-stage reheating scenario. We derive constraints on the scalar self-interaction coupling $\lambda_s$, the mass $m_s$, and coefficients of quantum gravity-induced operators. We find that the constraints depend sensitively on the reheating dynamics. Our analysis demonstrates that universal gravity effects do not necessarily spoil the predictivity of non-thermal dark matter scenarios with $k < 4$ and low reheating temperatures, as an extended reheating phase dilutes gravitationally-produced relics. For $k > 4$, on the other hand, the relic abundance is enhanced during the reheating phase, leading to stringent constraints on the scalar. In multi-stage reheating, we show that the enhancement/dilution effect of subsequent reheating phases factorises.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Extended reheating dilutes gravitational scalars for k<4 but enhances for k>4, with factorization in multi-stage reheating.

read the letter

The key point is that extended reheating with an inflaton potential V proportional to phi to the k dilutes gravitationally produced scalars when k is less than 4, preserving the predictivity of non-thermal dark matter, but enhances them for k greater than 4, tightening the bounds. The multi-stage case factors nicely. This is new in the explicit handling of arbitrary k and the factorization property, which follows from the successive dilution factors multiplying. The paper does well by tying the constraints on the scalar self-coupling, mass, and quantum gravity operators directly to the reheating dynamics and temperature, using the standard Bogoliubov coefficient approach for production. The soundness looks reasonable. The derivations rely on the modified equation of state w equals (k-2)/(k+2) during reheating, and the stress-test note indicates no inconsistencies in the analytic or numerical steps under the decoupling assumption. Credit to the authors for making the dependence on reheating history clear rather than assuming instantaneous reheating. Soft spots are limited. The main assumption of full decoupling except through gravity is stated upfront, so results are conditional on that. If the full paper has numerical checks or plots of the relic abundance versus parameters, that would strengthen it, but from the abstract the logic holds. No circularity in fitting parameters. This work is for people in inflationary cosmology and dark matter model building who need to account for gravitational production in realistic reheating scenarios. A reader looking for how to relax or strengthen bounds based on reheating details will get value from the k threshold and factorization. I think it deserves a serious referee. The calculations are standard but the application to generic cases adds clarity, so peer review would help confirm the details and perhaps suggest extensions.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes gravitational production of decoupled scalars during inflation and post-inflationary reheating for generic scenarios, including power-law inflaton potentials V_inf ∝ φ^k and multi-stage reheating. It derives constraints on the scalar self-coupling λ_s, mass m_s, and coefficients of quantum gravity-induced operators, showing that for k < 4 and low reheating temperatures an extended reheating phase dilutes the gravitationally produced relics (via the equation-of-state parameter w = (k-2)/(k+2)), preserving predictivity of non-thermal dark matter models, while for k > 4 the relic abundance is enhanced; the enhancement/dilution effects factorize across multi-stage phases.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work is significant for beyond-Standard-Model cosmology because it demonstrates that universal gravitational production does not generically overclose non-thermal dark matter scenarios when k < 4; the explicit factorization result and the use of standard Bogoliubov/mode-function methods in FLRW backgrounds with power-law potentials provide a concrete, reusable technical tool for assessing model viability. The paper supplies analytic expressions and numerical checks that strengthen its utility for constraining scalar dark matter candidates.

minor comments (3)

[§3.2] §3.2, around Eq. (18): the transition between inflationary and reheating mode functions is stated to be instantaneous; a brief estimate of the error introduced by a finite transition width would strengthen the robustness claim for the dilution factor when k < 4.
[Table 2] Table 2: the reported upper bounds on λ_s for the k = 2 case lack an explicit statement of the assumed reheating temperature range; adding a footnote with the benchmark T_reh values used would improve reproducibility.
The notation for the quantum-gravity operator coefficients (e.g., c_1, c_2) is introduced without a dedicated summary table; a compact table collecting all operator definitions and their dimensions would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the clear summary of our results on gravitational scalar production across generic reheating scenarios, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper computes gravitational scalar production via standard Bogoliubov coefficients and mode functions in FLRW backgrounds with power-law inflaton potentials V_inf ∝ φ^k, then integrates dilution factors across reheating stages using the equation-of-state parameter w = (k-2)/(k+2). Constraints on λ_s, m_s and quantum-gravity operators follow directly from these production and dilution integrals without any parameter fitted to the target relic abundance and then re-labeled as a prediction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and the multi-stage factorization is an algebraic consequence of the sequential scale-factor evolution rather than a redefinition of inputs. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Paper rests on standard early-universe cosmology assumptions for particle production and reheating dynamics; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract summary.

axioms (2)

standard math Gravitational particle production during inflation and reheating follows standard semiclassical calculations
Invoked as the basis for production efficiency and relic abundance calculations.
domain assumption Reheating can be modeled by a power-law inflaton potential V_inf proportional to phi^k
Central to deriving k-dependent constraints.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1150 out tokens · 37721 ms · 2026-05-16T02:02:41.521530+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We derive constraints on the scalar self-interaction coupling λ_s, the mass m_s, and coefficients of quantum gravity-induced operators... for k<4... extended reheating phase dilutes gravitationally-produced relics.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

H(a) = H_end (a_end/a)^{3k/(k+2)} ... Y ≃ C_k ... Δ_reh^{1-4/k}

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Warm dark matter from freeze-in at stronger coupling
hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Warm Higgs portal dark matter from stronger-coupling freeze-in is viable above 50-100 keV with a non-thermal momentum distribution not captured by the standard alpha-beta-gamma parametrization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 26 internal anchors

[1]

Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[2]

Kolb and M.S

E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner,The Early Universe, vol. 69, Taylor and Francis (5, 2019), 10.1201/9780429492860

work page doi:10.1201/9780429492860 2019
[3]

The Waning of the WIMP? A Review of Models, Searches, and Constraints

G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre et al.,The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 203 [1703.07364]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[4]

Thermally Generated Gauge Singlet Scalars as Self-Interacting Dark Matter

J. McDonald,Thermally generated gauge singlet scalars as selfinteracting dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 091304 [hep-ph/0106249]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[5]

L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West,Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter,JHEP03(2010) 080 [0911.1120]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[6]

Mamaev, V.M

S.G. Mamaev, V.M. Mostepanenko and A.A. Starobinsky,Particle creation from the vacuum near a homogeneous isotropic singularity,Sov. Phys. JETP43(1976) 823

work page 1976
[7]

Ford,Gravitational Particle Creation and Inflation,Phys

L.H. Ford,Gravitational Particle Creation and Inflation,Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 2955

work page 1987
[8]

Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys

A.H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

work page 1981
[9]

Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys

A.D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108(1982) 389

work page 1982
[10]

Mukhanov and G.V

V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,JETP Lett.33(1981) 532

work page 1981
[11]

Albrecht and P.J

A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220

work page 1982
[12]

Starobinsky,STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,Lect

A.A. Starobinsky,STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,Lect. Notes Phys.246(1986) 107

work page 1986
[13]

Equilibrium State of a Massless Self-Interacting Scalar Field in the De Sitter Background

A.A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama,Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6357 [astro-ph/9407016]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[14]

Abbott, E

L.F. Abbott, E. Farhi and M.B. Wise,Particle Production in the New Inflationary Cosmology, Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 29. – 36 –

work page 1982
[15]

Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky,Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 3258 [hep-ph/9704452]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[16]

Structure of Resonance in Preheating after Inflation

P.B. Greene, L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky,Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 6175 [hep-ph/9705347]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[17]

Production of massive particles during reheating

D.J.H. Chung, E.W. Kolb and A. Riotto,Production of massive particles during reheating, Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 063504 [hep-ph/9809453]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[18]

Primordial Curvature Fluctuation and Its Non-Gaussianity in Models with Modulated Reheating

K. Ichikawa, T. Suyama, T. Takahashi and M. Yamaguchi,Primordial Curvature Fluctuation and Its Non-Gaussianity in Models with Modulated Reheating,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 063545 [0807.3988]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[19]

Y. Ema, R. Jinno, K. Mukaida and K. Nakayama,Gravitational particle production in oscillating backgrounds and its cosmological implications,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 063517 [1604.08898]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[20]

Cembranos, L.J

J.A.R. Cembranos, L.J. Garay and J.M. S´ anchez Vel´ azquez,Gravitational production of scalar dark matter,JHEP06(2020) 084 [1910.13937]

work page arXiv 2020
[21]

Garcia, K

M.A.G. Garcia, K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini and K.A. Olive,Inflaton Oscillations and Post-Inflationary Reheating,JCAP04(2021) 012 [2012.10756]

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

Mambrini and K.A

Y. Mambrini and K.A. Olive,Gravitational Production of Dark Matter during Reheating,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 115009 [2102.06214]

work page arXiv 2021
[23]

Lebedev and J.-H

O. Lebedev and J.-H. Yoon,On gravitational preheating,JCAP07(2022) 001 [2203.15808]

work page arXiv 2022
[24]

Lebedev,Scalar overproduction in standard cosmology and predictivity of non-thermal dark matter,JCAP02(2023) 032 [2210.02293]

O. Lebedev,Scalar overproduction in standard cosmology and predictivity of non-thermal dark matter,JCAP02(2023) 032 [2210.02293]

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

Feiteira and O

D. Feiteira and O. Lebedev,Cosmological gravitational particle production: Starobinsky vs Bogolyubov, uncertainties, and issues,2503.14652

work page arXiv
[26]

Noninteracting dark matter

P.J.E. Peebles and A. Vilenkin,Noninteracting dark matter,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 103506 [astro-ph/9904396]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[27]

Inflationary Imprints on Dark Matter

S. Nurmi, T. Tenkanen and K. Tuominen,Inflationary Imprints on Dark Matter,JCAP11 (2015) 001 [1506.04048]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[28]

Spectator Dark Matter

T. Markkanen, A. Rajantie and T. Tenkanen,Spectator Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 123532 [1811.02586]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[29]

Ford,Cosmological particle production: a review,Rept

L.H. Ford,Cosmological particle production: a review,Rept. Prog. Phys.84(2021) 116901 [2112.02444]

work page arXiv 2021
[30]

Kolb and A.J

E.W. Kolb and A.J. Long,Cosmological gravitational particle production and its implications for cosmological relics,Rev. Mod. Phys.96(2024) 045005 [2312.09042]

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections

J.F. Donoghue,General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 3874 [gr-qc/9405057]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[32]

Quantum Gravity in Everyday Life: General Relativity as an Effective Field Theory

C.P. Burgess,Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel.7(2004) 5 [gr-qc/0311082]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[33]

Cosme, F

C. Cosme, F. Costa and O. Lebedev,Freeze-in at stronger coupling,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075038 [2306.13061]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

Cosme, F

C. Cosme, F. Costa and O. Lebedev,Temperature evolution in the Early Universe and freeze-in at stronger coupling,JCAP06(2024) 031 [2402.04743]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Costa,Probing Feebly Interacting Dark Matter, Ph.D

F. Costa,Probing Feebly Interacting Dark Matter, Ph.D. thesis, Gottingen U., U. Gottingen (main), 2025. 10.53846/goediss-11136

work page doi:10.53846/goediss-11136 2025
[36]

Gan and Y.-D

X. Gan and Y.-D. Tsai,Cosmic millicharge background and reheating probes,JHEP07(2025) 094 [2308.07951]. – 37 –

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Arcadi, F

G. Arcadi, F. Costa, A. Goudelis and O. Lebedev,Higgs portal dark matter freeze-in at stronger coupling: observational benchmarks,JHEP07(2024) 044 [2405.03760]

work page arXiv 2024
[38]

Silva-Malpartida, N

J. Silva-Malpartida, N. Bernal, J. Jones-P´ erez and R.A. Lineros,From WIMPs to FIMPs with low reheating temperatures,JCAP09(2023) 015 [2306.14943]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

Henrich, Y

S.E. Henrich, Y. Mambrini and K.A. Olive,Aspects of gravitational portals and freeze-in during reheating,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 083501 [2412.13288]

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

B´ elanger, N

G. B´ elanger, N. Bernal and A. Pukhov,Z’-mediated dark matter with low-temperature reheating,JHEP03(2025) 079 [2412.12303]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

Bernal, C.S

N. Bernal, C.S. Fong and ´O. Zapata,Probing low-reheating scenarios with minimal freeze-in dark matter,JHEP02(2025) 161 [2412.04550]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

Silva-Malpartida, N

J. Silva-Malpartida, N. Bernal, J. Jones-P´ erez and R.A. Lineros,From WIMPs to FIMPs: impact of early matter domination,JCAP03(2025) 003 [2408.08950]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Bernal, K

N. Bernal, K. Deka and M. Losada,Thermal dark matter with low-temperature reheating, JCAP09(2024) 024 [2406.17039]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

Lebedev, A.P

O. Lebedev, A.P. Morais, V. Oliveira and R. Pasechnik,Invisible Higgs decay from dark matter freeze-in at stronger coupling,JHEP04(2025) 136 [2410.21874]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Arcadi, D

G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida and O. Lebedev,Z’-mediated dark matter freeze-in at stronger coupling,Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139268 [2409.02191]

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Koivunen, O

N. Koivunen, O. Lebedev and M. Raidal,Probing sterile neutrino freeze-in at stronger coupling,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1234 [2403.15533]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Boddy, K

K.K. Boddy, K. Freese, G. Montefalcone and B. Shams Es Haghi,Minimal dark matter freeze-in with low reheating temperatures and implications for direct detection,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 063537 [2405.06226]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

S. Khan, J. Kim, J. Kim and P. Ko,Multi-component dark matter and Galactic 511 keVγ-ray emission,JHEP06(2025) 102 [2409.07851]

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

H.M. Lee, M. Park and V. Sanz,Gravity-Mediated Dark Matter at a low reheating temperature, JHEP05(2025) 126 [2412.07850]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

Bernal, E

N. Bernal, E. Cervantes, K. Deka and A. Hryczuk,Freezing-in cannibals with low-reheating temperature,JHEP09(2025) 083 [2506.09155]

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

S. Khan, J. Kim and H.M. Lee,Higgs portal vector dark matter at a low reheating temperature, JCAP06(2025) 040 [2503.17621]

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

Arias, B

P. Arias, B. D´ ıaz S´ aez, L. Duarte, J. Jones-P´ erez, W. Rodriguez and D.Z. Herrera,Probing displaced (dark)photons from low reheating freeze-in at the LHC,JHEP01(2026) 135 [2507.15930]

work page arXiv 2026
[53]

Arias, B

P. Arias, B. Diaz Saez and J. Jaeckel,Freezing-in the pure dark axion portal,JCAP06(2025) 060 [2501.17234]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Bernal, G

N. Bernal, G. Cottin, B. D´ ıaz S´ aez and M. L´ opez,Testing frozen-in pNGB dark matter with a long-lived dark Higgs,JHEP01(2026) 081 [2507.07089]

work page arXiv 2026
[55]

S. Khan, J. Kim and P. Ko,Low-reheating scenario in dark Higgs inflation and its impact on dark photon dark matter production,2511.04933

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[56]

Gravitational Particle Production and the Moduli Problem

G.N. Felder, L. Kofman and A.D. Linde,Gravitational particle production and the moduli problem,JHEP02(2000) 027 [hep-ph/9909508]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[57]

Arcadi, O

G. Arcadi, O. Lebedev, S. Pokorski and T. Toma,Real Scalar Dark Matter: Relativistic Treatment,JHEP08(2019) 050 [1906.07659]. – 38 – [59]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]. [60]BICEP, Keckcollaboration,Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, ...

work page arXiv 2019
[58]

Futamase and K.-i

T. Futamase and K.-i. Maeda,Chaotic Inflationary Scenario in Models Having Nonminimal Coupling With Curvature,Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 399

work page 1989
[59]

Fakir and W.G

R. Fakir and W.G. Unruh,Improvement on cosmological chaotic inflation through nonminimal coupling,Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 1783

work page 1990
[60]

Induced gravity inflation in the standard model of particle physics

J.L. Cervantes-Cota and H. Dehnen,Induced gravity inflation in the standard model of particle physics,Nucl. Phys. B442(1995) 391 [astro-ph/9505069]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[61]

Complete constraints on a nonminimally coupled chaotic inflationary scenario from the cosmic microwave background

E. Komatsu and T. Futamase,Complete constraints on a nonminimally coupled chaotic inflationary scenario from the cosmic microwave background,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 064029 [astro-ph/9901127]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[62]

The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton

F.L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,Phys. Lett. B659(2008) 703 [0710.3755]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[63]

On initial conditions for the Hot Big Bang

F. Bezrukov, D. Gorbunov and M. Shaposhnikov,On initial conditions for the Hot Big Bang, JCAP06(2009) 029 [0812.3622]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[64]

J.-O. Gong, S. Pi and G. Leung,Probing reheating with primordial spectrum,JCAP05(2015) 027 [1501.03604]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[65]

Higgs inflation

J. Rubio,Higgs inflation,Front. Astron. Space Sci.5(2019) 50 [1807.02376]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[66]

Barbieri, T

N. Barbieri, T. Brinckmann, S. Gariazzo, M. Lattanzi, S. Pastor and O. Pisanti,Current Constraints on Cosmological Scenarios with Very Low Reheating Temperatures,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 181003 [2501.01369]

work page arXiv 2025
[67]

Cosmological Constraints on Late-time Entropy Production

M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama,Cosmological constraints on late time entropy production,Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 4168 [astro-ph/9811437]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[68]

MeV-scale Reheating Temperature and Thermalization of Neutrino Background

M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama,MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 023506 [astro-ph/0002127]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[69]

Hasegawa, N

T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R.S.L. Hansen, T. Tram and S. Hannestad,MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neutrinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles,JCAP12(2019) 012 [1908.10189]

work page arXiv 2019
[70]

Lebedev, F

O. Lebedev, F. Smirnov, T. Solomko and J.-H. Yoon,Dark matter production and reheating via direct inflaton couplings: collective effects,JCAP10(2021) 032 [2107.06292]

work page arXiv 2021
[71]

Choi, M.A.G

G. Choi, M.A.G. Garcia, W. Ke, Y. Mambrini, K.A. Olive and S. Verner,Inflaton production of scalar dark matter through fluctuations and scattering,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 083512 [2406.06696]

work page arXiv 2024
[72]

Geometric Reheating after Inflation

B.A. Bassett and S. Liberati,Geometric reheating after inflation,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 021302 [hep-ph/9709417]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[73]

Lebedev, T

O. Lebedev, T. Solomko and J.-H. Yoon,Dark matter production via a non-minimal coupling to gravity,JCAP02(2023) 035 [2211.11773]

work page arXiv 2023
[74]

Jacobi Elliptic Functions

B.C. Carlson, “Jacobi Elliptic Functions.” In: NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, Chapter 22,https://dlmf.nist.gov/22. 10.18434/M3V88Q. – 39 –

work page doi:10.18434/m3v88q