Theoretical description of interface states in a tetragonal lattice of bianisotropic resonators

Alina D. Rozenblit; Nikita A. Olekhno

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Theoretical description of interface states in a tetragonal lattice of bianisotropic resonators

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A cubic lattice of bianisotropic resonators becomes a weak photonic topological insulator only once next-nearest-neighbor couplings are included.

desk verdict A well-derived analytic tight-binding model for a cubic lattice of bianisotropic resonators that convincingly shows next-nearest couplings matter topologically—but the promised full-wave comparison is missing, so the model's physical reach is unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.12179 v2 pith:CYTCLB3N submitted 2026-02-12 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.class-ph

Alina D. Rozenblit , Nikita A. Olekhno This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hallphysics.class-ph

keywords bianisotropicresonatorsphotonictopologicalinsulatordyadicGreen'sfunctiontight-bindingmodelBerrycurvatureinterfacestatescubiclatticeweak

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds a theoretical model of a three-dimensional cubic lattice of bianisotropic resonators—particles that mix electric and magnetic dipole responses—using a dyadic Green's function approach in the point-dipole approximation. It derives Bloch Hamiltonians for three approximation levels: nearest-neighbor, next-nearest, and third-coordination-sphere couplings. The central finding is that bianisotropy opens a band gap and a domain wall between regions of opposite bianisotropy hosts localized in-gap interface states, but this topological behavior requires at least next-nearest-neighbor couplings; the nearest-neighbor-only model remains topologically trivial. If correct, this tells designers of photonic topological insulators that long-range couplings are essential for realizing weak topological phases in cubic resonator arrays.

What carries the argument

The pseudospin basis and block-diagonal Bloch Hamiltonians H↑(↓) obtained from the coupled-dipole equation with dyadic Green's functions. Bianisotropy enters as ±Ωσ2 terms; the key mechanism is that nearest-neighbor couplings alone preserve a symmetry that forces Berry curvature to vanish, whereas next-nearest couplings (the coskx coskz etc. terms and the sin kx sin ky σ1 term) break that symmetry and produce nonzero Berry curvature. The real-space tight-binding matrix B = M⊗G(r) − Ω⊗σ1⊗σ2 enables finite-lattice eigenmode and inverse-participation-ratio analysis of the domain-wall states.

What would settle it

Measure the band structure and domain-wall transmission of a cubic array of bianisotropic resonators with lattice constant comparable to the resonance wavelength so that far-field couplings are non-negligible; if in-gap localized states appear even when only nearest-neighbor separations are considered, the claim that long-range couplings are necessary for the topological phase would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a simple cubic lattice of bianisotropic resonators, described by electric and magnetic point dipoles with a dyadic Green's function in the near-field limit, is a weak photonic topological insulator. In the absence of bianisotropy, the band structure shows quadratic fourfold degeneracies at high-symmetry points; introducing bianisotropy (quantified by parameter Ω) opens a band gap whose width is linear in Ω. When the bianisotropy parameter has opposite signs in two halves of the lattice, the domain wall hosts strongly localized in-gap states. Berry curvature calculations show that the gapped phases of Models II and III (with next-nearest or third-coordination couplings)

Load-bearing premise

The entire model assumes the resonators are subwavelength point dipoles with only in-plane xy electric and magnetic dipoles and only the 1/r^3 near-field terms of the dyadic Green's function; if higher multipoles, z-oriented dipoles, or far-field contributions matter, the Bloch Hamiltonians and the topological classification change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A cubic array of bianisotropic resonators with a domain wall in bianisotropy supports in-gap interface states localized at the wall.
The nearest-neighbor approximation is insufficient: it predicts trivial topology and no in-gap states even with bianisotropy; at least next-nearest couplings are needed.
The band gap width scales linearly with the bianisotropy parameter Ω.
The structure constitutes a weak photonic topological insulator with nonzero Berry curvature for Fz and vanishing Fx and Fy, analogous to stacked 2D square-lattice layers.
In the absence of bianisotropy, the model exhibits quadratic fourfold degeneracies at Γ, M, Z, and A, distinct from the linear Dirac degeneracies of hexagonal-lattice arrays.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The result likely generalizes: any 3D resonator lattice whose nearest-neighbor coupling graph admits a symmetry forcing zero Berry curvature may require second-neighbor terms to realize a weak topological phase; identifying which coordination spheres break the symmetry could guide design.
The quasi-static point-dipole approximation suggests a testable extension: recompute the Berry curvature using the full dyadic Green's function (including 1/r terms and radiation) to see whether nearest-neighbor couplings become topologically nontrivial once far fields are included.
Because the interface states are two-dimensional and localized at a designable domain wall, they could serve as waveguides for routing signals along arbitrary surfaces inside a 3D photonic structure.
The predicted linear-in-Ω gap and strong localization could be verified experimentally with ceramic cylindrical resonators at microwave frequencies, similar to existing 2D realizations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the short version: this is a careful, honest analytic paper that does something new—constructs full-Brillouin-zone Bloch Hamiltonians for a cubic lattice of bianisotropic resonators and shows, convincingly, that nearest-neighbor coupling alone gives trivial topology, while including second-neighbor couplings opens the gap and produces the expected weak-PTI physics with domain-wall states. The dyadic Green's function derivation is standard but completed cleanly, with explicit Hamiltonians for three coordination spheres and analytic band expressions in the supplement. No fitting, no hidden parameters: the only free parameter is the bianisotropy Ω, which enters linearly and is scanned. That counts for a lot.

What's genuinely new: prior work on 3D bianisotropic lattices was limited to perturbation theory near high-symmetry points; here you get the whole BZ, including the flat bands, the quadratic degeneracies, and the Berry-curvature distributions that show F_z nonzero while F_x,F_y vanish, consistent with a weak PTI built from stacked 2D square lattices. The domain-wall eigenstates look real: in-gap localized states with IPRs that separate cleanly from bulk.

Now the soft spots, in order of seriousness. First, the abstract's last sentence promises full-wave numerical simulations. The manuscript and supplement contain none. That is not a rhetorical quibble; it's the difference between a plausible effective model and an experimentally grounded one. The authors do flag the limits of the point-dipole, near-field, xy-only approximation in Section VI, and that transparency is good. But the advertised validation is simply absent, so a reader cannot know whether a real array of ceramic cylinders—the kind used in their Ref. [7]—actually realizes this model. Second, the title/abstract inconsistency: the arXiv title says 'tetragonal' while the paper body says 'simple cubic'. That's easily fixed but needs fixing. Third, the analytic derivation assumes duality, reciprocity, and frequency-independent χ; these are standard in the subfield and not fatal, but they are assumptions.

The stress-test note is right about the missing simulation. The reader's verdict of conditional is fair, though I'd lean a bit more positive on the derivation itself: it is internally consistent, and the comparison between Models I, II, and III is persuasive analytically. The physics claim—that second-neighbor couplings are required—rests on the derivation, not on fitting, so it is likely correct within the model's stated premises.

Who benefits: people working on photonic topological insulators, especially all-dielectric metasurfaces, will want this as a reference for the cubic lattice and for the role of long-range couplings. If the authors add the simulation or at least a systematic estimate of the neglected terms, it becomes a solid PRB-level paper. As is, it deserves a serious referee but not unconditional acceptance. I'd send it out, with a clear request that the abstract be aligned with the content and the full-wave comparison either added or explicitly removed with a justification.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a dyadic Green's function tight-binding description of a simple cubic lattice of bianisotropic electric and magnetic point dipoles, with couplings truncated at the first, second, or third coordination sphere (Models I–III). It derives the corresponding Bloch Hamiltonians and analytical band expressions, analyzes band structure, DOS, eigenmode localization, and Berry curvature, and concludes that next-nearest-neighbor couplings are necessary to obtain nontrivial topological properties and in-gap domain-wall interface states. The abstract promises a full-wave numerical comparison that is not present in the manuscript or Supplemental Material.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper extends the coupled-dipole approach to a 3D cubic lattice and provides a systematic comparison of coordination-sphere truncations, showing that the nearest-neighbor model is insufficient for topological physics. Strengths include the explicit analytic Hamiltonians and eigenvalues, the numerical demonstration of localized interface states in the real-space model, and the Berry curvature visualizations. However, the physical relevance of the point-dipole near-field model is not validated by the advertised full-wave simulations, and the topological classification is inferred from qualitative Berry curvature patterns rather than from a quantized invariant.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] The abstract's final sentence states: 'Finally, we compare the theoretical results with full-wave numerical simulations for an array of bianisotropic resonators.' No such comparison appears anywhere in Sections I–VI or the Supplemental Material. This is a load-bearing validation because the central claim depends on the point-dipole, near-field, xy-only model surviving in realistic resonator arrays. The authors should either add the full-wave simulations or remove the sentence and explicitly state that the model remains unvalidated.
[Section V] The conclusion that the system is a 'weak PTI formed by the stacking of 2D square lattice layers' is based on visually inspecting Berry curvature distributions in Fig. 4 and Fig. S2. A nonzero Berry curvature distribution does not by itself establish a topological phase; one must integrate the Berry curvature (e.g., Chern number per k_z slice or spin Chern number) or provide another quantized invariant. Without such a computation, the topological classification is not rigorously supported. Please add the relevant invariant or soften the claim accordingly.
[Eq. (7)] The real-space tight-binding matrix in Eq. (7) uses a connectivity matrix M with entries M_st = 1 if sites are connected, but the definition of 'connected' is not specified for Models II and III. In particular, it is unclear whether M includes only nearest-neighbor links or also next-nearest and third-neighbor links, and how the distance-dependent Green's function G(r) is combined with that connectivity. This ambiguity affects the numerical domain-wall simulations in Section IV and should be clarified.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract / Title] The abstract describes a 'tetragonal lattice' while the title and body describe a 'simple cubic lattice'. These are different lattices in crystallographic terminology; please harmonize.
[Eq. (9)] The pseudo-delta function 'δ(λ−λ_j)=1 for λ=λ_j' is not a proper function; please define it as a Gaussian or histogram bin, or state that the DOS is a histogram approximation.
[Fig. 2 caption] The caption contains a typo: '(f) Model I II real-space Hamiltonians' should be 'Model III'.
[Supplemental S2] There is a typo in the Supplemental Material: 'analytial expressions' should be 'analytical expressions'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Bloch Hamiltonians are derived from stated dyadic Green's-function approximations, and all reported outputs are computed from these derived models rather than being fitted inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained under the stated physical approximations. The Bloch Hamiltonians in Eqs. (3)-(5) are obtained in Section II/S1 from the dyadic Green's function for point electric and magnetic dipoles, using explicit assumptions: electromagnetic duality, reciprocal bianisotropic polarizability, quasi-static near-field limit, and xy-oriented dipoles. The parameters λ and Ω are algebraic combinations of the polarizability components, not fitted constants. Bianisotropy enters through a derived ±Ωσ2 term, and the Berry curvature and interface states are computed from the resulting Hamiltonians; none of these outputs is used to tune the model. Self-citations to Refs. [7] and [26] are methodological references anchored in prior experimental realizations and do not carry the load of a uniqueness claim or of a hidden ansatz. The distinction between Models I, II, and III is an explicit model comparison, not a post hoc fit. The abstract's promise of full-wave numerical comparison is not fulfilled in the manuscript, and Section VI itself flags the limitations of the dipole, quasi-static, near-field approximations. That is a validation/completeness gap, but not a circularity. No specific reduction of a prediction to an input or to a self-citation can be exhibited, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fundamentally new entities are introduced; the model uses standard electrodynamic approximations and a pseudospin basis that is a mathematical construction. The key free parameter is the bianisotropy strength Ω, chosen illustratively.

free parameters (1)

Ω (bianisotropy parameter) = 7 (illustrative; results shown for Ω=0 and Ω=7)
Dimensionless magnetoelectric coupling; chosen by hand, not fitted. Band gap width is proportional to |Ω| per Supplemental, and the existence of in-gap states is demonstrated at Ω=7.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Electromagnetic duality: electric and magnetic polarizabilities equal, αee=αmm=βσ0.
Stated in Section II.A and Supplemental S1, Eq. (3); required for block-diagonalization.
domain assumption Reciprocal bianisotropy: αem = -αme^T = -χσ2.
Stated in Section II.A and Supplemental S1, Eq. (4).
domain assumption Only in-plane (xy) electric and magnetic dipole moments; z-components neglected.
Introduced in Section II.A; acknowledged in Discussion as limiting.
domain assumption Quasi-static near-field approximation k0r << 1; only 1/r^3 terms in dyadic Green's function retained.
Section II.A; central to the simple Hamiltonian forms.
standard math Bloch's theorem for periodic lattices.
Used to convert real-space dipole sums to Bloch Hamiltonians.
standard math Dyadic Green's function expressions from Tai's textbook.
Supplemental S1, Eqs. (10)-(12).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Theoretical description of interface states in a tetragonal lattice of bianisotropic resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CYTCLB3N

@misc{pith2026260212179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Theoretical description of interface states in a tetragonal lattice of bianisotropic resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CYTCLB3N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.12179}
}

read the original abstract

In the present paper, we construct a theoretical description of a three-dimensional photonic structure in the form of a tetragonal lattice of bianisotropic resonators applying a dyadic Green's function approach. By representing the resonators as point electric and magnetic dipoles, we obtain the Bloch Hamiltonians for the approximations considering the interactions between the nearest, next-nearest, and next-to-next-nearest resonators, and construct the corresponding real-space tight-binding models. We analyze the band diagrams, spatial structure of the eigenmodes, and their localization, revealing quadratic degeneracies in the vicinity of high-symmetry points in the absence of bianisotropy and the emergence of in-gap states localized at a domain wall upon the introduction of bianisotropy. Finally, we compare the theoretical results with full-wave numerical simulations for an array of bianisotropic resonators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.12179 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** (a)-(c) Energy bands of the Bloch Hamiltonians for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** (a) Spectrum of eigenvalues λ for the system consisting of two domains with 10 × 10 × 10 sites and bianisotropic parameters Ω = 7 and Ω = −7, respectively. Color shows the inverse participation ratio Eq. (10). (b)-(i) Eigenfunctions profiles corresponding to the absolute value of pseudospin-up polarization px + mx shown by color, which demonstrate (b),(c) bulk states, (d)-(f) interface states localized at the domain… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Numerically evaluated Berry curvature distributions for t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[7]

deﬁnes the interactions be- tween the electric (magnetic) dipoles in diﬀerent sites. The second term describes the hybridization of the elec- tric and magnetic dipole moments in each of the lattice sites that is governed by the [N ×N ] bianisotropy param- eter matrix Ω st = Ω(xs,y s,z s)δst, where Ω( xs,y s,z s) is the value of bianisotropy parameter in a...

2000
[1]

Topological photonics,

Ling Lu, John D Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c, “Topological photonics,” Nature Photonics 8, 821–829 (2014)

2014
[2]

Topological photonics,

Tomoki Ozawa, Hannah M. Price, Alberto Amo, Nathan Goldman, Mohammad Hafezi, Ling Lu, Mikael C. Rechtsman, David Schuster, Jonathan Simon, Oded Zil- berberg, and Iacopo Carusotto, “Topological photonics,” Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 015006 (2019)

2019
[3]

Limitations and possibilities of topological pho- tonics,

Daniel Leykam, Haoran Xue, Baile Zhang, and Y. D. Chong, “Limitations and possibilities of topological pho- tonics,” Nature Reviews Physics 8, 55–64 (2026)

2026
[4]

( 5) are included in Supplemental Material [ 41]

and Eq. ( 5) are included in Supplemental Material [ 41]. B. Real-space tight-binding models To study the spatial structure of eigenmodes in a ﬁnite lattice, we consider the real-space tight-binding model described by the following matrix [ 38] (in units of a = 1): ˆB = ˆM ⊗ ˆG(r) − ˆΩ ⊗ ˆσ1 ⊗ ˆσ2, (7) where ˆM is the [ N ×N ] connectivity matrix describi...
[5]

Photonic topological states mediated by staggered bianisotropy,

Daniel A Bobylev, Daria A Smirnova, and Maxim A Gor- lach, “Photonic topological states mediated by staggered bianisotropy,” Laser & Photonics Reviews 15, 1900392 (2021)

2021
[6]

Far-ﬁeld probing of leaky topological states in all- dielectric metasurfaces,

Maxim A Gorlach, Xiang Ni, Daria A Smirnova, Dmitry Korobkin, Dmitry Zhirihin, Alexey P Slobozhanyuk, Pavel A Belov, Andrea Al` u, and Alexander B Khanikaev, “Far-ﬁeld probing of leaky topological states in all- dielectric metasurfaces,” Nature Communications 9, 909 (2018)

2018
[8]

Nonlinear light generation in topological nanostruc- tures,

Sergey Kruk, Alexander Poddubny, Daria Smirnova, Lei Wang, Alexey Slobozhanyuk, Alexander Shorokhov, Ivan Kravchenko, Barry Luther-Davies, and Yuri Kivshar, “Nonlinear light generation in topological nanostruc- tures,” Nature Nanotechnology 14, 126–130 (2019)

2019

Show all 60 references

[9]

Application of topological edge states in mag- netic resonance imaging,

Viktor M. Puchnin, Olga V. Matvievskaya, Alexey P. Slobozhanyuk, Alena V. Shchelokova, and Nikita A. Olekhno, “Application of topological edge states in mag- netic resonance imaging,” Physical Review Applied 20, 024076 (2023)

2023
[10]

takes low values of the order of 1 /N, where N is the total number of sites, while for localized states it tends to unity (in the limiting case when the eigenmode is completely localized at one site). Figure 3(a) shows a numerically calculated spectrum of the tight-binding mod...
[11]

Topological edge states in all-dielectric square-lattice arrays of bianisotropic mi- crowave resonators,

Alina D Rozenblit, Georgiy D Kurganov, Dmitry V Zhir- ihin, and Nikita A Olekhno, “Topological edge states in all-dielectric square-lattice arrays of bianisotropic mi- crowave resonators,” Physical Review B 111, 085415 (2025)

2025
[12]

Microwave applica- tions of photonic topological insulators,

Shukai Ma and Steven M Anlage, “Microwave applica- tions of photonic topological insulators,” Applied Physics Letters 116 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008046

2020 doi
[13]

Realization of a three-dimensional photonic 8 higher-order topological insulator,

Ziyao Wang, Yan Meng, Bei Yan, Dong Zhao, Linyun Yang, Jingming Chen, Minqi Cheng, Tao Xiao, Perry Ping Shum, Gui-Geng Liu, Yihao Yang, Hong- sheng Chen, Xiang Xi, Zhen-Xiao Zhu, Biye Xie, and Zhen Gao, “Realization of a three-dimensional photonic 8 higher-order topological in...

2025
[14]

Photonic axion insulator,

Gui-Geng Liu, Subhaskar Mandal, Xiang Xi, Qiang Wang, Chiara Devescovi, Antonio Morales-P´ erez, Ziyao Wang, Linyun Yang, Rimi Banerjee, Yang Long, Yan Meng, Peiheng Zhou, Zhen Gao, Yidong Chong, Aitzol Garc ´ ıa-Etxarri, Maia G. Vergniory, and Baile Zhang, “Photonic axion ins...

2025
[15]

Photonic axion insulator with non- coplanar chiral hinge transport,

Hua-Shan Lai, Yan-Chen Zhou, Ze-Qun Sun, Cheng He, and Yan-Feng Chen, “Photonic axion insulator with non- coplanar chiral hinge transport,” Nature Communica- tions 16, 3826 (2025)

2025
[16]

Solitons in polyacetylene,

W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieﬀer, and A. J. Heeger, “Solitons in polyacetylene,” Physical Review Letters 42, 1698–1701 (1979)

1979
[17]

Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material,

Long-Hua Wu and Xiao Hu, “Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material,” Physical Review Letters 114, 223901 (2015)

2015
[18]

Observation of unidirec- tional backscattering-immune topological electromag- netic states,

Zheng Wang, Yidong Chong, John D Joannopou- los, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c, “Observation of unidirec- tional backscattering-immune topological electromag- netic states,” Nature 461, 772–775 (2009)

2009
[19]

Realizing ef- fective magnetic ﬁeld for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation,

Kejie Fang, Zongfu Yu, and Shanhui Fan, “Realizing ef- fective magnetic ﬁeld for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation,” Nature Photonics 6, 782–787 (2012)

2012
[20]

Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry,

F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, “Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry,” Physical Review Letters 100, 013904 (2008)

2008
[21]

Photonic topological insulators,

Alexander B Khanikaev, S Hossein Mousavi, Wang-Kong Tse, Mehdi Kargarian, Allan H MacDonald, and Gen- nady Shvets, “Photonic topological insulators,” Nature Materials 12, 233–239 (2013)

2013
[22]

Higher-order quan- tum spin Hall eﬀect in a photonic crystal,

Biye Xie, Guangxu Su, Hong-Fei Wang, Feng Liu, Lumang Hu, Si-Yuan Yu, Peng Zhan, Ming-Hui Lu, Zhenlin Wang, and Yan-Feng Chen, “Higher-order quan- tum spin Hall eﬀect in a photonic crystal,” Nature Com- munications 11, 3768 (2020)

2020
[23]

Observation of photonic topological valley hall edge states,

Jiho Noh, Sheng Huang, Kevin P. Chen, and Mikael C. Rechtsman, “Observation of photonic topological valley hall edge states,” Physical Review Letters 120, 063902 (2018)

2018
[24]

Topologically protected refraction of robust kink states in valley photonic crystals,

Fei Gao, Haoran Xue, Zhaoju Yang, Kueifu Lai, Yang Yu, Xiao Lin, Yidong Chong, Gennady Shvets, and Baile Zhang, “Topologically protected refraction of robust kink states in valley photonic crystals,” Nature Physics 14, 140–144 (2018)

2018
[25]

Quantized electric multipole insulators,

Wladimir A. Benalcazar, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Tay- lor L. Hughes, “Quantized electric multipole insulators,” Science 357, 61–66 (2017)

2017
[26]

Visualization of higher-order topo- logical insulating phases in two-dimensional dielectric photonic crystals,

Bi-Ye Xie, Guang-Xu Su, Hong-Fei Wang, Hai Su, Xiao- Peng Shen, Peng Zhan, Ming-Hui Lu, Zhen-Lin Wang, and Yan-Feng Chen, “Visualization of higher-order topo- logical insulating phases in two-dimensional dielectric photonic crystals,” Physical Review Letters 122, 233903 (2019)

2019
[27]

Direct obser- vation of corner states in second-order topological pho- tonic crystal slabs,

Xiao-Dong Chen, Wei-Min Deng, Fu-Long Shi, Fu-Li Zhao, Min Chen, and Jian-Wen Dong, “Direct obser- vation of corner states in second-order topological pho- tonic crystal slabs,” Physical Review Letters 122, 233902 (2019)

2019
[28]

Higher-order topological states in photonic kagome crystals with long-range inter- actions,

Mengyao Li, Dmitry Zhirihin, Maxim Gorlach, Xiang Ni, Dmitry Filonov, Alexey Slobozhanyuk, Andrea Al` u, and Alexander B Khanikaev, “Higher-order topological states in photonic kagome crystals with long-range inter- actions,” Nature Photonics 14, 89–94 (2020)

2020
[29]

Photonic Jackiw-Rebbi states in all-dielectric structures controlled by bianisotropy,

Alexey A Gorlach, Dmitry V Zhirihin, Alexey P Slobozhanyuk, Alexander B Khanikaev, and Maxim A Gorlach, “Photonic Jackiw-Rebbi states in all-dielectric structures controlled by bianisotropy,” Physical Review B 99, 205122 (2019)

2019
[30]

Near-ﬁeld imaging of spin-locked edge states in all-dielectric topological metasurfaces,

Alexey Slobozhanyuk, Alena V. Shchelokova, Xiang Ni, S. Hossein Mousavi, Daria A. Smirnova, Pavel A. Belov, Andrea Al` u, Yuri S. Kivshar, and Alexan- der B. Khanikaev, “Near-ﬁeld imaging of spin-locked edge states in all-dielectric topological metasurfaces,” Applied Physics L...

2019
[31]

Three-dimensional all-dielectric photonic topological insulator,

Alexey Slobozhanyuk, S Hossein Mousavi, Xiang Ni, Daria Smirnova, Yuri S Kivshar, and Alexander B Khanikaev, “Three-dimensional all-dielectric photonic topological insulator,” Nature Photonics 11, 130–136 (2017)

2017
[32]

Helical metasurfaces based on topological surface states in three-dimensional pho- tonic topological insulators,

Dmitry V. Zhirihin, Mikhail S. Sidorenko, Alina D. Rozenblit, Georgiy D. Kurganov, Maxim A. Gor- lach, Dmitry S. Filonov, Yuri S. Kivshar, and Alexey P. Slobozhanyuk, “Helical metasurfaces based on topological surface states in three-dimensional pho- tonic topological insulato...

2026 doi
[33]

Robust reconﬁgurable electromagnetic pathways within a photonic topological insulator,

Xiaojun Cheng, Camille Jouvaud, Xiang Ni, S Hossein Mousavi, Azriel Z Genack, and Alexander B Khanikaev, “Robust reconﬁgurable electromagnetic pathways within a photonic topological insulator,” Nature Materials 15, 542–548 (2016)

2016
[34]

Realization of a three- dimensional photonic topological insulator,

Yihao Yang, Zhen Gao, Haoran Xue, Li Zhang, Mengjia He, Zhaoju Yang, Ranjan Singh, Yidong Chong, Baile Zhang, and Hongsheng Chen, “Realization of a three- dimensional photonic topological insulator,” Nature 565, 622–626 (2019)

2019
[35]

Ef- fective theory of quadratic degeneracies,

Y. D. Chong, Xiao-Gang Wen, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c, “Ef- fective theory of quadratic degeneracies,” Physical Re- view B 77, 235125 (2008)

2008
[36]

Experimental demon- stration of topological eﬀects in bianisotropic metamate- rials,

Alexey P Slobozhanyuk, Alexander B Khanikaev, Dmitry S Filonov, Daria A Smirnova, Andrey E Mirosh- nichenko, and Yuri S Kivshar, “Experimental demon- stration of topological eﬀects in bianisotropic metamate- rials,” Scientiﬁc Reports 6, 22270 (2016)

2016
[37]

Gapless surface states originating from accidentally degenerate quadratic band touching in a three-dimensional tetragonal photonic crystal,

Tetsuyuki Ochiai, “Gapless surface states originating from accidentally degenerate quadratic band touching in a three-dimensional tetragonal photonic crystal,” Physi- cal Review A 96, 043842 (2017)

2017
[38]

Observa- tion of three-dimensional photonic dirac points and spin- polarized surface arcs,

Qinghua Guo, Oubo You, Biao Yang, James B Sell- man, Edward Blythe, Hongchao Liu, Yuanjiang Xiang, Jensen Li, Dianyuan Fan, Jing Chen, et al. , “Observa- tion of three-dimensional photonic dirac points and spin- polarized surface arcs,” Physical Review Letters 122, 203903 (2019)

2019
[39]

Photonic topological insulators in bianisotropic meta- materials,

Ruey-Lin Chern, Yang-Jie Shen, and You-Zhong Yu, “Photonic topological insulators in bianisotropic meta- materials,” Optics Express 30, 9944–9958 (2022)

2022
[40]

Bianisotropic metasurfaces: physics and ap- plications,

Viktar S Asadchy, Ana D ´ ıaz-Rubio, and Sergei A Tretyakov, “Bianisotropic metasurfaces: physics and ap- plications,” Nanophotonics 7, 1069–1094 (2018)

2018
[41]

CDPDS: coupled dipole method-based photonic dispersion solver,

Minkyung Kim and Junsuk Rho, “CDPDS: coupled dipole method-based photonic dispersion solver,” Com- puter Physics Communications 282, 108493 (2023)

2023
[42]

(IEEE Press, 1994)

Chen-To Tai, Dyadic Green Functions in Electromagnetic 9 Theory, 2nd ed. (IEEE Press, 1994)

1994
[43]

Ex- perimental realization of topological corner states in long-range-coupled electrical circuits,

Nikita A Olekhno, Alina D Rozenblit, Valerii I Kachin, Alexey A Dmitriev, Oleg I Burmistrov, Pavel S Sere- gin, Dmitry V Zhirihin, and Maxim A Gorlach, “Ex- perimental realization of topological corner states in long-range-coupled electrical circuits,” Physical Review B 105, L...

2022
[44]

See Supplemental Material at [URL] for (i) the detailed derivation of Bloch Hamiltonians in diﬀerent approxima- tions; (ii) analytial expressions for energy bands in the considered models and the study of their dependence on the bianisotropic parameter; and (iii) a comparison ...
[45]

Topological insulators with inversion symmetry,

Liang Fu and Charles L Kane, “Topological insulators with inversion symmetry,” Physical Review B 76, 045302 (2007)

2007
[46]

Electrons in disordered systems and the theory of localization,

David J. Thouless, “Electrons in disordered systems and the theory of localization,” Physics Reports 13, 93–142 (1974)

1974
[47]

Berry curvature on the Fermi sur- face: Anomalous Hall eﬀect as a topological Fermi-liquid property,

F. D. M. Haldane, “Berry curvature on the Fermi sur- face: Anomalous Hall eﬀect as a topological Fermi-liquid property,” Physical Review Letters 93, 206602 (2004)

2004
[48]

Recent advances in 2D, 3D and higher-order topological photon- ics,

Minkyung Kim, Zubin Jacob, and Junsuk Rho, “Recent advances in 2D, 3D and higher-order topological photon- ics,” Light: Science & Applications 9, 130 (2020)

2020
[49]

Berry phase eﬀects on electronic properties,

Di Xiao, Ming-Che Chang, and Qian Niu, “Berry phase eﬀects on electronic properties,” Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 1959–2007 (2010)

1959
[50]

Small mode volume topological photonic states in one-dimensional lattices with dipole-quadrupole interactions,

Raymond PH Wu and HC Ong, “Small mode volume topological photonic states in one-dimensional lattices with dipole-quadrupole interactions,” Physical Review Research 4, 023233 (2022)

2022
[51]

Multipole higher-order topology in a multimode lattice,

Maxim Mazanov, Anton S. Kupriianov, Roman S. Savelev, Zuxian He, and Maxim A. Gorlach, “Multipole higher-order topology in a multimode lattice,” Physical Review B 109, L201122 (2024)

2024
[52]

Photonic topological tran- sition in dimerized chains with the joint modulation of near-ﬁeld and far-ﬁeld couplings,

Caifu Fan, Xi Shi, Feng Wu, Yunhui Li, Haitao Jiang, Yong Sun, and Hong Chen, “Photonic topological tran- sition in dimerized chains with the joint modulation of near-ﬁeld and far-ﬁeld couplings,” Photonics Research 10, 41–49 (2022)

2022
[53]

All-dielectric photonic higher- order topological insulator induced by a staggered bian- isotropy,

Xiaoting Sang, Junpeng Hou, Yazhou Gu, Ya-Jie Wu, and Zhitong Li, “All-dielectric photonic higher- order topological insulator induced by a staggered bian- isotropy,” Physical Review A 109, 063518 (2024)

2024
[54]

Nonlinear topological photonics,

Daria Smirnova, Daniel Leykam, Yidong Chong, and Yuri Kivshar, “Nonlinear topological photonics,” Applied Physics Reviews 7, 021306 (2020) . Supplemental Material Theoretical description of a photonic topological insulator based on a cubic lattice of bianisotropic resonators A...

2020
[55]

(14) Applying Bloch’s theorem results in ( 14) taking the following form: ( Eijk Hijk ) =a−3 ( (coskxa + coskya − 2 coskza)ˆσ0 ⊗ ˆσ0 + 3(coskxa − coskya)ˆσ0 ⊗ ˆσ3 ) ( pijk mijk )

has the following form: ( Eijk Hijk ) = ∑ m=i±1 n=j l=k ( ˆGee ˆGem ˆGme ˆGmm ) ( pmnl mmnl ) + ∑ m=i n=j±1 l=k ( ˆGee ˆGem ˆGme ˆGmm ) ( pmnl mmnl ) + ∑ m=i n=j l=k±1 ( ˆGee ˆGem ˆGme ˆGmm ) ( pmnl mmnl ) . (14) Applying Bloch’s theorem results in ( 14) taking the following f...
[56]

(24) As seen from ( 22)– ( 24), the eigenvalues are linearly proportional to the value of the bianisotr opic parameter λ ∝ |Ω|, which is observed in Fig

coskz − 13 cos (2kz)+ + 4 cos (2ky) ( 307 + 144 √ 6 coskz + 64 cos (2kz) ) )} 1/2 . (24) As seen from ( 22)– ( 24), the eigenvalues are linearly proportional to the value of the bianisotr opic parameter λ ∝ |Ω|, which is observed in Fig. S1. S3. BERR Y CUR V A TURE FOR DIFFERE...
[57]

Bianisotropic metasurfaces: physics and applications,

Viktar S Asadchy, Ana D ´ ıaz-Rubio, and Sergei A Tretyakov, “Bianisotropic metasurfaces: physics and applications,” Nanophotonics 7, 1069–1094 (2018)

2018
[58]

CDPDS: coupled dipole method -based photonic dispersion solver,

Minkyung Kim and Junsuk Rho, “CDPDS: coupled dipole method -based photonic dispersion solver,” Computer Physics Communications 282, 108493 (2023)

2023
[59]

(IEEE Press, 1994)

Chen-To Tai, Dyadic Green Functions in Electromagnetic Theory , 2nd ed. (IEEE Press, 1994)

1994
[60]

Three- dimensional all-dielectric photonic topological insulato r,

Alexey Slobozhanyuk, S Hossein Mousavi, Xiang Ni, Daria Sm irnova, Yuri S Kivshar, and Alexander B Khanikaev, “Three- dimensional all-dielectric photonic topological insulato r,” Nature Photonics 11, 130–136 (2017)

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [7]

deﬁnes the interactions be- tween the electric (magnetic) dipoles in diﬀerent sites. The second term describes the hybridization of the elec- tric and magnetic dipole moments in each of the lattice sites that is governed by the [N ×N ] bianisotropy param- eter matrix Ω st = Ω(xs,y s,z s)δst, where Ω( xs,y s,z s) is the value of bianisotropy parameter in a...

2000

[2] [1]

Topological photonics,

Ling Lu, John D Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c, “Topological photonics,” Nature Photonics 8, 821–829 (2014)

2014

[3] [2]

Topological photonics,

Tomoki Ozawa, Hannah M. Price, Alberto Amo, Nathan Goldman, Mohammad Hafezi, Ling Lu, Mikael C. Rechtsman, David Schuster, Jonathan Simon, Oded Zil- berberg, and Iacopo Carusotto, “Topological photonics,” Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 015006 (2019)

2019

[4] [3]

Limitations and possibilities of topological pho- tonics,

Daniel Leykam, Haoran Xue, Baile Zhang, and Y. D. Chong, “Limitations and possibilities of topological pho- tonics,” Nature Reviews Physics 8, 55–64 (2026)

2026

[5] [4]

( 5) are included in Supplemental Material [ 41]

and Eq. ( 5) are included in Supplemental Material [ 41]. B. Real-space tight-binding models To study the spatial structure of eigenmodes in a ﬁnite lattice, we consider the real-space tight-binding model described by the following matrix [ 38] (in units of a = 1): ˆB = ˆM ⊗ ˆG(r) − ˆΩ ⊗ ˆσ1 ⊗ ˆσ2, (7) where ˆM is the [ N ×N ] connectivity matrix describi...

[6] [5]

Photonic topological states mediated by staggered bianisotropy,

Daniel A Bobylev, Daria A Smirnova, and Maxim A Gor- lach, “Photonic topological states mediated by staggered bianisotropy,” Laser & Photonics Reviews 15, 1900392 (2021)

2021

[7] [6]

Far-ﬁeld probing of leaky topological states in all- dielectric metasurfaces,

Maxim A Gorlach, Xiang Ni, Daria A Smirnova, Dmitry Korobkin, Dmitry Zhirihin, Alexey P Slobozhanyuk, Pavel A Belov, Andrea Al` u, and Alexander B Khanikaev, “Far-ﬁeld probing of leaky topological states in all- dielectric metasurfaces,” Nature Communications 9, 909 (2018)

2018

[8] [8]

Nonlinear light generation in topological nanostruc- tures,

Sergey Kruk, Alexander Poddubny, Daria Smirnova, Lei Wang, Alexey Slobozhanyuk, Alexander Shorokhov, Ivan Kravchenko, Barry Luther-Davies, and Yuri Kivshar, “Nonlinear light generation in topological nanostruc- tures,” Nature Nanotechnology 14, 126–130 (2019)

2019