arxiv: 2602.22840 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Redshift evolution of the Hubble constant: Constraints and new insights from an interacting dark energy model

Xinyi Dai , Yupeng Yang , Yicheng Wang , Yankun Qu , Shuangxi Yi , Fayin Wang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 19:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

keywords interacting dark energyHubble constantredshift evolutionHubble tensiondark sector interactioncosmological constraintsBAOCMB priors

0 comments

The pith

An interacting dark energy model produces a redshift-dependent Hubble constant that decreases at higher redshifts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a modified interacting dark energy model where energy is exchanged between dark energy and dark matter, causing the Hubble constant to vary with redshift rather than remain fixed. Late-universe observations from BAO, cosmic chronometers, and supernovae constrain the interaction parameter alpha to approximately 0.01, supporting a power-law decline in H0 as redshift increases. Adding CMB distance priors tightens the bound on alpha by orders of magnitude because the interaction is suppressed at early times by baryon-photon coupling. This framework supplies a consistent dynamical description of H0 evolution that differs from the constant value assumed in Lambda CDM.

Core claim

In the interacting dark energy framework, energy exchange between dark energy and dark matter induces a redshift dependence of H0 that is parameterized by a single constant alpha. Late-Universe data yield alpha = 0.0107^{+0.0032}_{-0.011}, revealing a decreasing trend of H0 with redshift and supporting power-law evolution beyond Lambda CDM. CMB data further constrain alpha to order 10^{-5} because strong baryon-photon coupling suppresses dark-sector interactions at high redshifts.

What carries the argument

The redshift-dependent Hubble constant induced by dark-sector energy exchange and parameterized by the constant alpha that sets the interaction strength.

If this is right

Late-universe data alone favor a small positive alpha indicating H0 decreases with increasing redshift.
The model yields a power-law evolution for H0 that differs from the constant value in Lambda CDM.
Inclusion of CMB data suppresses the allowed interaction strength at early times due to baryon-photon coupling.
The framework supplies a dynamical mechanism capable of describing epoch-dependent H0 measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future surveys at intermediate redshifts could directly test whether the inferred decline in H0 continues or flattens.
If the same interaction affects perturbation growth, it might produce observable signatures in large-scale structure that differ from standard predictions.
Relaxing the single-parameter assumption to allow redshift-dependent interaction strengths could be confronted with next-generation BAO and supernova samples.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen functional form of the dark-sector interaction is assumed to produce a redshift-dependent Hubble constant that can be captured entirely by fitting one constant alpha to the observations.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the Hubble constant at redshift around 1 that shows no decline relative to low-redshift values, or that forces alpha to be consistent with zero at high significance, would rule out the model's predicted evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.22840 by Fayin Wang, Shuangxi Yi, Xinyi Dai, Yankun Qu, Yicheng Wang, Yupeng Yang.

read the original abstract

We develop a modified interacting dark energy (IDE) model to study the redshift evolution of the Hubble constant ($H_0$), in light of the Hubble tension. In this framework, the energy exchange between dark energy and dark matter induces a redshift dependence of $H_0$. We evaluate the model against a comprehensive suite of observations, including baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) from DESI DR2 and SDSS, cosmic chronometers, type Ia supernovae from the Pantheon sample, and Planck CMB distance priors. Analysis of late-Universe data yields $\alpha = 0.0107^{+0.0032}_{-0.011}$, with the best-fit value on the order of $10^{-2}$, revealing a decreasing trend of $H_0$ with redshift. This supports a power-law evolution beyond $\Lambda$CDM. Incorporating CMB data further tightens the constraint to the order of $10^{-5}$, which we attribute to the suppression of dark-sector interactions at high redshifts, a consequence of the strong baryon--photon coupling. These results indicate that the IDE framework provides a theoretically consistent and observationally viable mechanism for describing the redshift evolution of $H_0$, offering a promising avenue toward alleviating the Hubble tension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Late-universe data give a small non-zero alpha implying H0 falls with redshift, but CMB priors drive alpha to zero and remove the effect.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper fits a modified interacting dark energy model to recent late-universe probes and obtains alpha around 0.01, which produces a decreasing H0 with redshift, but the same model with Planck distance priors forces alpha down to 10^{-5} and erases the trend. The authors attribute the suppression to baryon-photon coupling at high z. That split in results is the clearest output of the work. The paper applies an existing IDE interaction form, parameterized by a single constant alpha, to BAO from DESI DR2 and SDSS, cosmic chronometers, and Pantheon supernovae. It reports separate constraints for the late-only combination and the full set that includes CMB priors. The numbers are given explicitly and the change when CMB data enter is shown directly. This is a straightforward update of prior IDE constraints with newer data releases. The analysis is transparent about how the datasets pull in different directions. The soft spot is that the redshift dependence is not predicted independently; it is produced by fitting alpha to the very observations that are then said to reveal the trend. When the model must also satisfy early-universe distance priors, the interaction strength drops to a value consistent with zero, so the framework does not deliver a single parameter set that reconciles early and late H0 inferences at the same time. The abstract's phrasing about a promising avenue for the tension therefore overstates what the full dataset supports. The paper is useful for people who track IDE models and want the latest bounds from DESI DR2 on this specific interaction. A reader already working on the Hubble tension or dark-sector energy exchange will find the constraints worth checking. It is competent enough to go to a serious referee, who can examine the exact form of the interaction term and the likelihood setup. I would recommend sending it to peer review.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a modified interacting dark energy (IDE) model in which a constant parameter alpha governs energy exchange between dark energy and dark matter, inducing a redshift-dependent Hubble constant H0. Fits to late-Universe data (DESI DR2 and SDSS BAO, cosmic chronometers, Pantheon SNe) yield alpha = 0.0107^{+0.0032}_{-0.011}, interpreted as a decreasing H0(z) trend beyond LambdaCDM. Adding Planck CMB distance priors suppresses alpha to order 10^{-5}, attributed to baryon-photon coupling at high redshift. The authors conclude that the IDE framework provides a consistent and viable description of H0 evolution and a promising route to alleviating the Hubble tension.

Significance. If the model could be shown to accommodate both early- and late-Universe constraints with a single non-zero alpha that independently predicts the observed H0 discrepancy, the result would be significant for tension-resolution studies. The use of multiple independent late-time datasets is a positive feature. However, the reported suppression of alpha by CMB priors indicates that any apparent alleviation is confined to late-Universe subsets and does not extend to a joint early-late reconciliation.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the IDE framework offers a promising avenue toward alleviating the Hubble tension is not supported when the full dataset is used, because CMB inclusion drives alpha to ~10^{-5} (consistent with zero interaction), leaving the model unable to maintain a non-zero interaction while satisfying CMB distance priors.
[Abstract] Abstract and results: the redshift trend is obtained by fitting the free parameter alpha to the same observations that are then said to reveal the trend; the evolution is therefore defined by the fit rather than independently predicted, weakening the evidence for a genuine departure from LambdaCDM.
[Abstract] Abstract: the attribution of alpha suppression to baryon-photon coupling at high z requires an explicit quantitative demonstration in the model equations (e.g., the interaction term and its redshift scaling) to show it is not simply an indication that the model fails to reconcile the datasets simultaneously.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract provides no derivation details, error budgets, or checks against post-hoc data choices for the reported constraints on alpha.
[Model section] Clarify the precise functional form of the dark-sector interaction that produces the redshift-dependent H0 captured by the single constant alpha.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. We respond point-by-point to the major comments, clarifying our results and indicating revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the IDE framework offers a promising avenue toward alleviating the Hubble tension is not supported when the full dataset is used, because CMB inclusion drives alpha to ~10^{-5} (consistent with zero interaction), leaving the model unable to maintain a non-zero interaction while satisfying CMB distance priors.

Authors: We agree that CMB distance priors drive alpha to O(10^{-5}), consistent with zero interaction at high redshift. This is expected in our framework because the interaction is physically suppressed early on. The model nevertheless yields a statistically preferred non-zero alpha from late-universe data alone, providing a consistent description of H0(z) evolution in that regime. We have revised the abstract to state that the IDE framework offers a promising description of late-universe H0 evolution and a potential route to understanding the tension when early-universe constraints are considered separately, rather than claiming simultaneous reconciliation. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results: the redshift trend is obtained by fitting the free parameter alpha to the same observations that are then said to reveal the trend; the evolution is therefore defined by the fit rather than independently predicted, weakening the evidence for a genuine departure from LambdaCDM.

Authors: The model with constant alpha predicts a specific functional form for the redshift dependence of the effective Hubble parameter via the interaction term in the continuity equations. The data are used to constrain the single free parameter alpha; the resulting best-fit value being non-zero at ~3 sigma in the late-universe combination demonstrates that the predicted evolution is favored by the observations. This constitutes a test of the model's functional prediction rather than a circular definition of the trend. We have added clarifying text in the results section to emphasize the model's a priori predicted H0(z) form. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the attribution of alpha suppression to baryon-photon coupling at high z requires an explicit quantitative demonstration in the model equations (e.g., the interaction term and its redshift scaling) to show it is not simply an indication that the model fails to reconcile the datasets simultaneously.

Authors: We accept this point and have added an explicit derivation in the model section. Starting from the interaction term Q = 3 alpha H rho_de, we show that the effective coupling is modulated by the baryon-photon fluid's tight coupling at high z, which scales as (1+z)^4 in the early universe and suppresses the dark-sector exchange rate to O(10^{-5}) by z~1100. This quantitative scaling is now presented with the relevant equations, confirming it is a physical feature of the model rather than an ad hoc failure to reconcile datasets. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

H0(z) redshift trend is produced by fitting the interaction parameter alpha to late-time data under an assumed functional form, reducing the claimed evolution to a fitted output rather than an independent derivation.

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract (model results paragraph)]
"Analysis of late-Universe data yields α = 0.0107^{+0.0032}_{-0.011}, with the best-fit value on the order of 10^{-2}, revealing a decreasing trend of H_0 with redshift."

The model is constructed so that the dark-sector interaction (controlled by alpha) produces redshift-dependent H0 by design. Fitting alpha to the late-time data (BAO, chronometers, supernovae) then 'reveals' the trend, which is therefore the direct statistical output of the fit rather than an a priori prediction or first-principles result.

full rationale

The paper introduces a modified IDE model whose interaction term is parameterized by a constant alpha chosen to induce explicit redshift dependence in H0. Late-Universe observations are then used to constrain alpha, directly yielding the reported decreasing H0(z) trend. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the evolution is not predicted from first principles or external constraints but is defined by the model's ansatz and the fit to the same data. Inclusion of CMB priors drives alpha to ~10^{-5} (consistent with zero), showing the trend is not robust across the full dataset. The central claim of a viable mechanism for H0 evolution therefore rests on the parameterization and fit rather than an independent derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a single fitted interaction strength alpha and the assumption that energy exchange in the dark sector produces a power-law redshift dependence of H0 within standard FLRW cosmology.

free parameters (1)

alpha = 0.0107^{+0.0032}_{-0.011}
Interaction strength parameter whose value is determined by fitting to late-universe observations.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Energy is exchanged between dark energy and dark matter while total energy is conserved in the FLRW background
Core modeling assumption invoked to derive the redshift dependence of H0.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5544 in / 1316 out tokens · 24012 ms · 2026-05-15T19:24:34.119875+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Q=δHρ_m ... α≡δ/2 ... H(z)≃H0(1+z)^{-α} √[Ωm0(1+z)^3+(1-Ωm0)]
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

late-Universe data yields α=0.0107^{+0.0032}_{-0.011}; CMB tightens to O(10^{-5})

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 109 canonical work pages · 42 internal anchors

[1]

1999, , 517, 565, 10.1086/307221

S. Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project), Astrophys. J.517, 565 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9812133

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[2]

Discovery of a Supernova Explosion at Half the Age of the Universe and its Cosmological Implications

S. Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project), Nature391, 51 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9712212

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[3]

A. G. Riesset al.(Supernova Search Team), Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[4]

R. R. Caldwell and M. Doran, Phys. Rev. D69, 103517 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0305334

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[5]

Holographic explanation of wide-angle power correlation suppression in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation

Z.-Y. Huang, B. Wang, E. Abdalla, and R.-K. Su, JCAP 05, 013 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0501059

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[6]

Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results

R. Adamet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.594, A1 (2016), arXiv:1502.01582 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[7]

The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample

S. Alamet al.(BOSS), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.470, 2617 (2017), arXiv:1607.03155 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[8]

The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: measuring the cosmic growth rate with the two-point galaxy correlation function

C. Contreraset al.(WiggleZ), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.430, 924 (2013), arXiv:1302.5178 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[9]

Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP

M. Tegmarket al.(SDSS), Phys. Rev. D69, 103501 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0310723

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[10]

Alestas, L

G. Alestas, L. Kazantzidis, and L. Perivolaropoulos, Phys. Rev. D101, 123516 (2020), arXiv:2004.08363 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2020
[11]

In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 153001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[12]

A. G. Riesset al., Astrophys. J. Lett.934, L7 (2022), arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[14]

Y. Yang, Y. Wang, and X. Dai, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 224 (2025), arXiv:2502.17792 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension

V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal, and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 221301 (2019), arXiv:1811.04083 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[16]

Hu and F.-Y

J.-P. Hu and F.-Y. Wang, Universe9, 94 (2023), arXiv:2302.05709 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

Elizalde, J

E. Elizalde, J. Gluza, and M. Khurshudyan, (2021), arXiv:2104.01077 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[18]

Khurshudyan and E

M. Khurshudyan and E. Elizalde, Galaxies12, 31 (2024), arXiv:2402.08630 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

E. Di Valentinoet al.(CosmoVerse Network), Phys. Dark Univ.49, 101965 (2025), arXiv:2504.01669 [astro- ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[20]

Yang, Eur

Y. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1350 (2025), arXiv:2508.17848 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Y. Yang, X. Dai, and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. D111, 103534 (2025), arXiv:2505.09879 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Wu, T.-N

P.-J. Wu, T.-N. Li, G.-H. Du, and X. Zhang, (2025), arXiv:2509.02945 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Li and S

J.-X. Li and S. Wang, (2025), arXiv:2506.22953 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Li, P.-J

T.-N. Li, P.-J. Wu, G.-H. Du, Y.-H. Yao, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102068 (2025), arXiv:2507.07798 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Du, T.-N

G.-H. Du, T.-N. Li, P.-J. Wu, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, (2025), arXiv:2507.16589 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

L. Feng, T. Han, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, (2025), arXiv:2507.17315 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

S. L. Guedezounme, B. R. Dinda, and R. Maartens, (2025), arXiv:2507.18274 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

W. Yang, S. Zhang, O. Mena, S. Pan, and E. Di Valentino, (2025), arXiv:2508.19109 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

Cai, Z.-K

R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, S.-J. Wang, W.-W. Yu, and Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D105, L021301 (2022), arXiv:2107.13286 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[30]

L. S. Brito, J. F. Jesus, A. A. Escobal, and S. H. Pereira, (2024), arXiv:2412.06756 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

Di Valentino, R

E. Di Valentino, R. Z. Ferreira, L. Visinelli, and U. Danielsson, Phys. Dark Univ.26, 100385 (2019), arXiv:1906.11255 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2019
[32]

K. C. Wonget al.(H0LiCOW), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, 1420 (2020), arXiv:1907.04869 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2020
[33]

Millonet al., Astron

M. Millonet al., Astron. Astrophys.639, A101 (2020), arXiv:1912.08027 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

M. G. Dainotti, B. De Simone, T. Schiavone, G. Montani, E. Rinaldi, and G. Lambiase, Astrophys. J.912, 150 (2021), arXiv:2103.02117 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[35]

Malekjani, R

M. Malekjani, R. M. Conville, E. O. Colg´ ain, S. Pouro- jaghi, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 317 (2024), arXiv:2301.12725 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

Montani, N

G. Montani, N. Carlevaro, and M. G. Dainotti, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101847 (2025), arXiv:2411.07060 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Hu and F

J.-P. Hu and F. Y. Wang, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 517, 576 (2022), arXiv:2203.13037 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[38]

Bargiacchi, M

G. Bargiacchi, M. G. Dainotti, and S. Capozziello, New Astron. Rev.100, 101712 (2025), arXiv:2408.10707 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

M. G. Dainotti, B. De Simone, T. Schiavone, G. Montani, E. Rinaldi, G. Lambiase, M. Bogdan, and S. Ugale, Galaxies10, 24 (2022), arXiv:2201.09848 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[40]

Dainotti, B

M. Dainotti, B. De Simone, G. Montani;, T. Schi- avone;, and G. Lambiase., PoSCORFU2022, 235 (2023), arXiv:2301.10572 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

X. D. Jia, J. P. Hu, and F. Y. Wang, Astron. Astrophys. 674, A45 (2023), arXiv:2212.00238 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

E. O. Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, R. Solomon, G. Bargiacchi, S. Capozziello, M. G. Dainotti, and D. Stojkovic, Phys. Rev. D106, L041301 (2022), arXiv:2203.10558 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[43]

E. O. Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, R. Solomon, M. G. Dainotti, and D. Stojkovic, Phys. Dark Univ.44, 101464 (2024), arXiv:2206.11447 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

X. D. Jia, J. P. Hu, S. X. Yi, and F. Y. Wang, Astro- phys. J. Lett.979, L34 (2025), arXiv:2406.02019 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Krishnan, E

C. Krishnan, E. O. Colg´ ain, Ruchika, A. A. Sen, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and T. Yang, Phys. Rev. D102, 103525 (2020), arXiv:2002.06044 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2020
[46]

M. G. Dainottiet al., JHEAp48, 100405 (2025), arXiv:2501.11772 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[47]

A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), JCAP02, 021 (2025), arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[48]

DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[49]

Krishnan, E

C. Krishnan, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and T. Yang, Phys. Rev. D103, 103509 (2021), arXiv:2011.02858 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 451 (2010), arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[51]

S. M. Koksbang, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, L135 (2020), [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 500, (2021)], 9 arXiv:2008.07108 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2020
[52]

T. P. Sotiriou, Class. Quant. Grav.23, 5117 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0604028

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[53]

N´ ajera and A

A. N´ ajera and A. Fajardo, Phys. Dark Univ.34, 100889 (2021), arXiv:2104.14065 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

Paliathanasis, (2025), arXiv:2506.16223 [gr-qc]

A. Paliathanasis, (2025), arXiv:2506.16223 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

Schiavone, G

T. Schiavone, G. Montani, and F. Bombacigno, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.522, L72 (2023), arXiv:2211.16737 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[56]

Cai and A

R.-G. Cai and A. Wang, JCAP03, 002 (2005), arXiv:hep- th/0411025

work page arXiv 2005
[57]

Deffayet, Phys

C. Deffayet, Phys. Lett. B502, 199 (2001), arXiv:hep- th/0010186

work page arXiv 2001
[58]

Amendola, G

L. Amendola, G. Camargo Campos, and R. Rosen- feld, Phys. Rev. D75, 083506 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0610806

work page arXiv 2007
[59]

Interacting models may be key to solve the cosmic coincidence problem

S. del Campo, R. Herrera, and D. Pavon, JCAP01, 020 (2009), arXiv:0812.2210 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[60]

Y. L. Bolotin, A. Kostenko, O. A. Lemets, and D. A. Yerokhin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1530007 (2014), arXiv:1310.0085 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[61]

B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela, and D. Pavon, Rept. Prog. Phys.79, 096901 (2016), arXiv:1603.08299 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[62]

R.-G. Cai, N. Tamanini, and T. Yang, JCAP05, 031 (2017), arXiv:1703.07323 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[63]

Aljaf, D

M. Aljaf, D. Gregoris, and M. Khurshudyan, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 544 (2021), arXiv:2005.01891 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[64]

K. R. Mishra, S. K. J. Pacif, R. Kumar, and K. Bamba, Phys. Dark Univ.40, 101211 (2023), arXiv:2301.08743 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[65]

N. N. Pooya, Phys. Rev. D110, 043510 (2024), arXiv:2407.03766 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[66]

Li, P.-J

T.-N. Li, P.-J. Wu, G.-H. Du, S.-J. Jin, H.-L. Li, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Astrophys. J.976, 1 (2024), arXiv:2407.14934 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[67]

Halder, S

S. Halder, S. D. Odintsov, S. Pan, T. Saha, and E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Rev. D112, 023519 (2025), arXiv:2411.18300 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[68]

W. Yang, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, D. F. Mota, and S. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. D111, 103509 (2025), arXiv:2504.11973 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[69]

Paliathanasis, (2026), arXiv:2601.02789 [astro- ph.CO]

A. Paliathanasis, (2026), arXiv:2601.02789 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2026
[70]

van der Westhuizen, D

M. van der Westhuizen, D. Figueruelo, R. Thubisi, S. Sahlu, A. Abebe, and A. Paliathanasis, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102107 (2025), arXiv:2505.23306 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[71]

Supernovae type Ia data favour coupled phantom energy

E. Majerotto, D. Sapone, and L. Amendola, (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0410543

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[72]

Gonzalez-Espinoza and R

M. Gonzalez-Espinoza and R. Herrera, Phys. Dark Univ. 49, 101976 (2025), arXiv:2504.05435 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[73]

E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, 1753 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603057

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[74]

Dynamical systems in cosmology

C. G. Boehmer and N. Chan, “Dynamical systems in cosmology.” (2017) arXiv:1409.5585 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[75]

Hahn, M.J

C. Hahnet al., Astron. J.165, 253 (2023), arXiv:2208.08512 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[76]

Raichoor, J

A. Raichooret al., Astron. J.165, 126 (2023), arXiv:2208.08513 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[77]

Chaussidon, C

E. Chaussidonet al., Astrophys. J.944, 107 (2023), arXiv:2208.08511 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[78]

From cosmic deceleration to acceleration: new constraints from SN Ia and BAO/CMB

R. Giostri, M. Vargas dos Santos, I. Waga, R. R. R. Reis, M. O. Calv˜ ao, and B. L. Lago, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2012, 027 (2012), arXiv:1203.3213 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[79]

The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: mapping the distance-redshift relation with baryon acoustic oscillations

C. Blake, E. A. Kazin, F. Beutler, T. M. Davis, D. Parkin- son, S. Brough, M. Colless, C. Contreras, W. Couch, S. Croom, D. Croton, M. J. Drinkwater, K. Forster, D. Gilbank, M. Gladders, K. Glazebrook, B. Jelliffe, R. J. Jurek, I. H. Li, B. Madore, D. C. Martin, K. Pimb- blet, G. B. Poole, M. Pracy, R. Sharp, E. Wisnioski, D. Woods, T. K. Wyder, and H. K....

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[80]

W. J. Percival, B. A. Reid, D. J. Eisenstein, N. A. Bah- call, T. Budavari, J. A. Frieman, M. Fukugita, J. E. Gunn, ˇZ. Ivezi´ c, G. R. Knapp, R. G. Kron, J. Loveday, R. H. Lupton, T. A. McKay, A. Meiksin, R. C. Nichol, A. C. Pope, D. J. Schlegel, D. P. Schneider, D. N. Spergel, C. Stoughton, M. A. Strauss, A. S. Szalay, M. Tegmark, M. S. Vogeley, D. H. W...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[81]

The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant

F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley- Smith, L. Campbell, Q. Parker, W. Saunders, and F. Watson, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society416, 3017 (2011), arXiv:1106.3366 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

Showing first 80 references.