pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2504.01669 · v3 · submitted 2025-04-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

Abdul Malik Sultan, Adam Riess, Ad\`ele Poudou, Adri\`a G\'omez-Valent, Adrienn Pataki, Agnieszka Pollo, Alan Heavens, Alan Kogut, Alba Domi, Aleksander {\L}ukasz Lenart, Alessandro Melchiorri, Alessandro Santoni, Alessandro Vadal\`a, Alexander Bonilla, Alexander Reeves, Alexander Zhuk, Alexandra Amon, Alfio Bonanno, Alice Pisani, Ali \"Ovg\"un, Alireza Talebian, Aliya Batool, Amanda Weltman, Amare Abebe, Amin Aboubrahim, Ana Luisa Gonz\'alez Mor\'an, Andr\'as Kov\'acs, Andreas Lymperis, Andreas Papatriantafyllou, Andrew R. Liddle, Andronikos Paliathanasis, Andrzej Borowiec, Aneta Wojnar, Anil Kumar Yadav, Anita Yadav, Anjan Ananda Sen, Anjitha John William Mini Latha, Anne Christine Davis, Anowar J. Shajib, Anthony Walters, Anto Idicherian Lonappan, Anton Chudaykin, Antonella Palmese, Antonio Capodagli, Antonio da Silva, Antonio De Felice, Antonio Racioppi, Araceli Soler Oficial, Ariadna Montiel, Arianna Favale, Armando Bernui, Arman Tursunov, Arrianne Crystal Velasco, Asta Heinesen, Athanasios Bakopoulos, Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis, Avik De, Ayush Hazarika, Bahman Khanpour, Bangalore S. Sathyaprakash, Baojiu Li, Bartek Zgirski, Benjamin Bose, Benjamin L'Huillier, Benoit Famaey, Bhuvnesh Jain, Biesiada Marek, Bing Zhang, Biswajit Karmakar, Bivudutta Mishra, Bobomurat Ahmedov, Branko Dragovich, Brooks Thomas, Carlos Correa, Carlos G. Boiza, Caroline D. Huang, Carsten van de Bruck, Catarina Marques, Celia Escamilla-Rivera, Chandra Shekhar Saraf, Charalampos Tzerefos, Cheng-Yu Kuo, Chiara De Leo, Chi Zhang, Christian Pfeifer, Christine Lee, Christo Venter, Claudia Sc\'occola, Cl\'audio Gomes, Clecio Roque De Bom, Cora Uhlemann, Crescenzo Tortora, Cristian Moreno-Pulido, Damianos Iosifidis, Dan Grin, Daniela Grand\'on, Daniel Blixt, Daniel E. Holz, Daniele Oriti, Dan Scolnic, Dante Paz, D'Arcy Kenworthy, Daria Dobrycheva, Dario Bettoni, David Benisty, Davide Pedrotti, David Fern\'andez-Arenas, David F. Mota, David L. Wiltshire, David Sanchez Cid, David S. Pereira, David Tamayo, David Valls-Gabaud, Deng Wang, Denitsa Staicova, Despoina Totolou, Devon M. Williams, Diego Rubiera-Garcia, Dillon Brout, Dinko Milakovi\'c, Dominique Eckert, Dominique Sluse, Dom Pesce, Dong Ha Lee, Du\v{s}ko Borka, Ebrahim Yusofi, Eduardo Guendelman, Edward Olex, Elena Giusarma, Elena Terlevich, Elena Tomasetti, Eleonora Di Valentino, Elias C. Vagenas, Elisa Fazzari, Elisa G. M. Ferreira, Elsa M. Teixeira, Elvis Barakovic, Emanuela Dimastrogiovanni, Emanuelly Silva, Emil Brinch Holm, Emil Mottola, Emmanuel N. Saridakis, Emre Onur Kahya, Emre \"Oz\"ulker, Enrico Specogna, Enzo Brocato, Eoin \'O Colg\'ain, Erika Antonette Enriquez, Erik Jensko, Esha Bhatia, Eva-Maria Mueller, Fabio Bresolin, Felipe Andrade-Oliveira, Felipe Avila, Feven Markos Hunde, F. G\'abor R\'acz, Filippo Bouch\`e, Flavio Bombacigno, Florian Beutler, Florian Niedermann, Florian Pacaud, Fotios K. Anagnostopoulos, Francesco Bajardi, Francesco Pace, Francesco Sorrenti, Francisco S. N. Lobo, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, Fr\'ed\'eric Courbin, F. R. Joaquim, Frode K. Hansen, Gabriela Barenboim, Gabriela Garcia-Arroyo, Gabriel Farrugia, Gabriella Raimondo, Gabriel Lynch, Gaetano Lambiase, Gagandeep S. Anand, Gaspard Poulot, Gene Carlo Belinario, Genly Leon, Geraint F. Lewis, Gerasimos Kouniatalis, Gergely D\'alya, Germano Nardini, G\'eza Cs\"ornyei, Giacomo Galloni, Giada Bargiacchi, Giannis Papagiannopoulos, Giorgio Laverda, Giovanni Montani, Giovanni Otalora, Giulia De Somma, Giulia Gubitosi, Giuliana Fiorentino, Giuseppe Fanizza, Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano, Giuseppe Sarracino, Gonzalo J. Olmo, Goran S. Djordjevi\'c, Greg Sloan, Guadalupe Ca\~nas-Herrera, Guido Risaliti, Guillermo Franco-Abell\'an, Hanyu Cheng, Harry Desmond, Hassan Abdalla, Hayden Zammit, Hayley Camilleri, Helene M. Courtois, Hooman Moradpour, Houzun Chen, Hsu-Wen Chiang, Hume A. Feldman, Hussain Gohar, Ido Ben-Dayan, Ignacio Sevilla-Noarbe, Ignatios Antoniadis, Igor de Oliveira Cardoso Pedreira, Ilaria Musella, Il\'i dio Lopes, Ilim Cimdiker, Indranil Banik, In\^es S. Albuquerque, Ioannis D. Gialamas, Ippocratis Saltas, Iryna Vavilova, Isidro G\'omez-Vargas, Ismael Ayuso, Ismailov Nariman Zeynalabdi, Istv\'an Csabai, Istvan Szapudi, Ivan de Martino, Ivonne Zavala, Jack Singal, Jackson Levi Said, Jacobo Asorey, J. Alberto V\'azquez, James W. Rohlf, Janusz Gluza, Jaume Haro Cases, Javier de Cruz P\'erez, Javier Rubio, J. Bogdanoska, Jenny G. Sorce, Jenny Wagner, Jens Chluba, Jeremy Sakstein, Jessica Santiago, Jes\'us Torrado, Jim Braatz, Joan Bachs-Esteban, Joan Sol\`a Peracaula, John Blakeslee, John Webb, Jose A. R. Cembranos, Jos\'e Pedro Mimoso, Joseph Jensen, Joseph Sultana, Juan Garc\'ia-Bellido, Judit Prat, Julien Lesgourgues, Jun-Qian Jiang, Jurgen Mifsud, Karem Pe\~nal\'o Castillo, Karsten Jedamzik, Kathleen Sammut, Kay Lehnert, Keith R. Dienes, Khaled Said, Kimet Jusufi, Kishan Deka, Konrad Kuijken, Konstantinos Dialektopoulos, Krishna Naidoo, L\'aszl\'o \'Arp\'ad Gergely, Laura Herold, Laura Mersini-Houghton, Laur J\"arv, Lavinia Heisenberg, Laxmipriya Pati, Leandros Perivolaropoulos, Leila L. Graef, Lei Zu, L\'eon V.E. Koopmans, L\'eo Vacher, Levon Pogosian, Lilia Anguelova, Lindita Hamolli, Llu\'is Galbany, Lokesh kumar Duchaniya, Louise Breuval, Luca Caloni, Luca Izzo, Lucas Lombriser, Lucas Macri, Luca Visinelli, Luis A. Anchordoqui, Luis A. Escamilla, Luis E. Padilla, Lu Yin, Luz \'Angela Garc\'ia, Maciej Bilicki, Mahdieh Gol Bashmani Moghadam, Mahdi Najafi, Manolis Plionis, Manuel Gonzalez-Espinoza, Manuel Hohmann, Marcel A. van der Westhuizen, Marcella Marconi, Marcin Postolak, Marco de Cesare, Marco Regis, Marek Biesiada, Maret Einasto, Margherita Lembo, Margus Saal, Maria Caruana, Maria Giovanna Dainotti, Mariam Bouhmadi-L\'opez, Mariana Melo, Mariano Dom\'inguez, Mar\'ia P\'erez Garrote, Maria Petronikolou, Mariaveronica De Angelis, Maria Vincenzi, Marie-No\"elle C\'el\'erier, Marika Asgari, Marina Cort\^es, Marine Samsonyan, Mark Pace, Mark Reid, Markus Michael Rau, Martina Gerbino, Martin Kr\v{s}\v{s}\'ak, Martin S. Sloth, Martti Raidal, Masahiro Takada, Masoume Reyhani, Masroor C. Pookkillath, Massimiliano Romanello, Massimo Marengo, Mathias Garny, Mat\'ias Leizerovich, Matteo Forconi, Matteo Martinelli, Matteo Peronaci, Matteo Piani, Matteo Tagliazucchi, Matthildi Raftogianni, Maurice H.P.M. van Putten, Meet J. Vyas, Mehmet Demirci, Melina Michalopoulou, Merab Gogberashvili, Michael Klasen, Michele Cantiello, Michele Cicoli, Michele Moresco, Micol Benetti, Miguel A. Garc\'ia-Aspeitia, Miguel A. Sabogal, Miguel A. S. Pinto, Miguel Quartin, Miguel Zumalac\'arregui, Milan Milo\v{s}evi\'c, Milan S. Dimitrijevi\'c, Milos Dordevic, Mina Ghodsi, Mindaugas Kar\v{c}iauskas, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Morgan Le Delliou, Mustapha Ishak, Nastassia Grimm, Nelson J. Nunes, Nicholas Petropoulos, Nick Samaras, Nico Hamaus, Nicola Borghi, Nicola Deiosso, Nicolao Fornengo, Nicol\'as Augusto Kozameh, Nicola Tamanini, Nicoleta Voicu, Nicolina Pop, Nico Schuster, Nihan Kat{\i}rc{\i}, Nikolaos E. Mavromatos, Nikolina \v{S}ar\v{c}evi\'c, Nikos Chatzifotis, Nils A. Nilsson, Nils Sch\"oneberg, Noemi Frusciante, Octavian Postavaru, Oem Trivedi, Oleksii Sokoliuk, Olga Mena, Oliver Fabio Piattella, \"Ozg\"ur Akarsu, Paloma Morilla, Paolo Campeti, Paolo Salucci, Paula Boubel, Pawe{\l} Bielewicz, Pedro da Silveira Ferreira, Pekka Hein\"am\"aki, Petar Suman, P\'eter Raffai, Peter Schupp, Petros Asimakis, Pierros Ntelis, Pilar Ruiz-Lapuente, Pozo Nu\~nez, Pradyumn Kumar Sahoo, Pran Nath, Predrag Jovanovi\'c, Purba Mukherjee, Rados{\l}aw Wojtak, Rafaela Gsponer, Rafael C. Nunes, Rafid H. Dejrah, Rahul Shah, Rasmi Hajjar, Rebecca Briffa, Rebecca Habas, Reggie C. Pantig, Reginald Christian Bernardo, Renier Mendoza, Ricardo Ch\'avez, Riccardo della Monica, Richard I. Anderson, Richard Stiskalek, Richard Watkins, Rishav Roshan, Rita B. Neves, Roberto Molinaro, Roberto Terlevich, Roberto V. Maluf, Rocco D'Agostino, Rodrigo Sandoval-Orozco, Ronaldo C. Batista, Ruchika Kaushik, Ruth Durrer, Ruth Lazkoz, Sabino Matarrese, Saeed Rastgoo, Sahar Mohammadi, S. A. Kadam, Salvatore Capozziello, Salvatore Samuele Sirletti, Samuel Brieden, Sandeep Haridasu, Sanjay Mandal, Santiago Gonz\'alez-Gait\'an, Santosh V. Lohakare, Saurya Das, Scott Watson, Sebastian Bahamonde, Sebastian Grandis, Sebastian Trojanowski, Sergei D. Odintsov, Sergij Mazurenko, Shahab Joudaki, Shao-Jiang Wang, Sherry H. Suyu, Shouvik Roy Choudhury, Shruti Bhatporia, Shun-Sheng Li, Sim\~ao Marques Nunes, Simeon Bird, Simon Birrer, Simone Paradiso, Simony Santos da Costa, Siyang Li, Sofia Contarini, Sophie Henrot-Versill\'e, Soumya Chakrabarti, Spyros Basilakos, Stefano Casertano, Stefano Gariazzo, Stylianos A. Tsilioukas, Sunny Vagnozzi, Supriya Pan, Surajit Kalita, Suresh Kumar, Susana J. Landau, Suvodip Mukherjee, Sveva Castello, Swayamtrupta Panda, Tajron Juri\'c, Tanja Petrushevska, Tessa Baker, Thanasis Karakasis, Thejs Brinckmann, Theodoros Nakas, Tiago Barreiro, Tiago B. Gon\c{c}alves, Tiziano Schiavone, Tom Abel, Tomi Koivisto, Tommaso Treu, Torsten Bringmann, Umut Demirbozan, Upala Mukhopadhyay, Utkarsh Kumar, Valerio Marra, Vasileios Kalaitzidis, Vasiliki A. Mitsou, Vasilios Zarikas, Vedad Pasic, Veljko Vuj\v{c}i\'c, Venus Keus, Ver\'onica Motta, Vesna Borka Jovanovi\'c, V\'ictor H. C\'ardenas, Vid Irsic, Vincenzo Ripepi, Vincenzo Salzano, Violetta Impellizzeri, Violetta Sagun, Vitor da Fonseca, Vittorio Ghirardini, Vivian Poulin, Vladas Vansevi\v{c}ius, Vladimir A. Sre\'ckovi\'c, Wangzheng Zhang, Weiqiang Yang, Will Handley, William Giar\`e, Wojciech Hellwing, Xin Ren, Yo Toda, Yuejia Zhai, Yukei Murakami, Yu-Min Hu, Yun-Song Piao, Zahra Davari

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 22:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords cosmological tensionsHubble constantsystematicsnew physicsLambda-CDMdark energycosmic microwave backgroundlarge-scale structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cosmological tensions may indicate either unaccounted systematics or new physics beyond the standard model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This white paper examines the differences in measurements of key cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant across various probes. It argues that these tensions could arise from systematics in observations or signal the need for physics beyond the Lambda-CDM framework. The authors identify main objectives for the next decade along with science projects aimed at resolving the issues through refined measurements and analysis techniques. They review the principal cosmological probes, discuss potential sources of systematic error, and outline promising new physics scenarios that future surveys might detect.

Core claim

Divergences in the measurement of core cosmological parameters with varying levels of statistical confidence may be partially accounted for by systematics in various measurements or cosmological probes, but there is also a growing indication of potential new physics beyond the standard model. The paper reviews principal probes and potential systematics while discussing the most promising array of new physics and novel data analysis approaches.

What carries the argument

The divergence in measurements of core cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant and matter density parameter, drawn from comparisons between probes including the cosmic microwave background, type Ia supernovae, and large-scale structure surveys.

If this is right

  • Upcoming surveys will deliver higher-precision data capable of distinguishing between systematic explanations and new physics.
  • Models involving modified gravity, dynamical dark energy, or early-universe physics could resolve the observed parameter mismatches.
  • Novel data analysis methods that extend beyond traditional statistical approaches will be required to test physical models rigorously.
  • A combination of improved control over systematics and targeted searches for new physics will determine the origin of the discordances.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation of new physics would likely require corresponding adjustments in particle physics models and early-universe scenarios.
  • Systematic cross-correlation of independent probes offers a route to isolate whether tensions are measurement artifacts.
  • Resolving the tensions could alter predictions for the universe's late-time acceleration and structure growth.

Load-bearing premise

That the reported parameter divergences reflect genuine physical inconsistencies rather than residual unmodeled systematics or statistical fluctuations in the current data sets.

What would settle it

A future high-precision campaign in which all major cosmological probes converge on a single consistent set of Lambda-CDM parameter values without requiring additional systematic corrections or new physics.

read the original abstract

The standard model of cosmology has provided a good phenomenological description of a wide range of observations both at astrophysical and cosmological scales for several decades. This concordance model is constructed by a universal cosmological constant and supported by a matter sector described by the standard model of particle physics and a cold dark matter contribution, as well as very early-time inflationary physics, and underpinned by gravitation through general relativity. There have always been open questions about the soundness of the foundations of the standard model. However, recent years have shown that there may also be questions from the observational sector with the emergence of differences between certain cosmological probes. In this White Paper, we identify the key objectives that need to be addressed over the coming decade together with the core science projects that aim to meet these challenges. These discordances primarily rest on the divergence in the measurement of core cosmological parameters with varying levels of statistical confidence. These possible statistical tensions may be partially accounted for by systematics in various measurements or cosmological probes but there is also a growing indication of potential new physics beyond the standard model. After reviewing the principal probes used in the measurement of cosmological parameters, as well as potential systematics, we discuss the most promising array of potential new physics that may be observable in upcoming surveys. We also discuss the growing set of novel data analysis approaches that go beyond traditional methods to test physical models. [Abridged]

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a white paper reviewing the standard cosmological model and cataloging observational tensions in key parameters (e.g., Hubble constant, S8) measured across probes such as CMB, supernovae, BAO, and weak lensing. It surveys candidate systematics in these measurements, discusses possible extensions beyond the standard model, and outlines principal science objectives plus core projects for the coming decade to distinguish systematics from new physics.

Significance. If the synthesis holds, the paper provides a timely, structured roadmap that consolidates the current status of tensions and candidate resolutions. Its value lies in explicitly framing the open question of systematics versus new physics, listing concrete upcoming surveys and analysis methods, and avoiding over-claim on any single resolution. This serves the community by guiding coordinated efforts without introducing new derivations or fits.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the parenthetical reference to an 'Abridged' version should be removed or clarified in the final published form so readers know the scope of the full text.
  2. [Section on novel data analysis approaches] The discussion of novel data-analysis approaches would benefit from a short table or bullet list cross-referencing each method to the specific tension(s) it targets, improving readability for non-specialist readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately reflects the scope of the white paper as a compilation of observational tensions and a roadmap for distinguishing systematics from new physics in the coming decade.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review paper with no internal derivations

full rationale

This is a review/white paper that catalogs existing observational tensions from external data sets, surveys candidate systematics, and outlines a research roadmap without advancing any original derivations, equations, or quantitative predictions. All statements reference prior measurements and models with explicit caveats on statistical fluctuations and unmodeled systematics; no claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation chain defined within the manuscript itself. The central possibility (tensions from systematics or new physics) is presented as an open question rather than a demonstrated result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review and introduces no new free parameters, axioms beyond standard cosmology, or invented entities; it discusses possible extensions as open questions rather than postulates.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Lambda-CDM model provides a good phenomenological description of a wide range of observations
    Stated explicitly in the opening paragraph of the abstract as the concordance model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 8584 in / 1148 out tokens · 40306 ms · 2026-05-14T22:50:24.942171+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DimensionForcing dimension_forced unclear

    These discordances primarily rest on the divergence in the measurement of core cosmological parameters with varying levels of statistical confidence. These possible statistical tensions may be partially accounted for by systematics in various measurements or cosmological probes but there is also a growing indication of potential new physics beyond the standard model.

  • IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.PhiForcing phi_forcing unclear

    After reviewing the principal probes used in the measurement of cosmological parameters, as well as potential systematics, we discuss the most promising array of potential new physics that may be observable in upcoming surveys.

Forward citations

Cited by 23 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GI BAO as a cosmological consistency check

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GI BAO provides a robust consistency check for density BAO and shear data, with the first photometric measurement on DES Y3 showing agreement at α = 0.966 ± 0.252.

  2. Measuring neutrino mass and asymmetry through galaxy pairwise peculiar velocity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Galaxy pairwise peculiar velocities from Cosmicflows-4 yield M_ν = 0.24^{+0.34}_{-0.18} eV and η² = 2.14^{+0.30}_{-0.32} (7σ non-zero asymmetry) in the CMB framework, consistent with prior Planck results.

  3. First-order thermodynamics of multi-scalar-tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Multi-scalar-tensor gravity admits an exact covariant thermodynamic interpretation as an imperfect fluid whose heat flux involves a coupling-derived factor χ and a residual gradient sector, yielding multi-field therma...

  4. Cosmologically viable non-polynomial quasi-topological gravity: explicit models, $\Lambda$CDM limit and observational constraints

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-polynomial quasi-topological gravity models reproduce the standard thermal history, generate dynamical dark energy of geometric origin, and fit supernova, cosmic chronometer, and BAO data competitively with ΛCDM.

  5. On the origin of the environmental step: A BayeSN view of the ZTF SN Ia DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BayeSN analysis of ZTF SN Ia DR2 data shows a persistent ~0.1 mag environmental step that is intrinsic to the supernovae, not explained by differing dust properties.

  6. Geometric Constraints on the Pre-Recombination Expansion History from the Hubble Tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Model-independent reconstruction shows that early-universe modifications resolving the Hubble tension exist at the background level, requiring a smooth ~15% pre-recombination expansion rate enhancement.

  7. Double the axions, half the tension: multi-field early dark energy eases the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Two-field axion-like early dark energy reduces Hubble tension to 1.5 sigma residual and improves high-ell CMB fits over single-field models.

  8. Observational Tests for Distinguishing Classes of Cosmological Models

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new null test is proposed to isolate cosmologies with non-FLRW observational relations by characterizing how they violate curvature-consistency tests of the standard FLRW framework.

  9. Thermal channels of scalar and tensor waves in Jordan-frame scalar--tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Scalar and tensor perturbations in Jordan-frame scalar-tensor gravity admit an exact linear-order Eckart effective-fluid description, with gravitational-wave damping governed by the scalar sector's transverse-traceles...

  10. On the origin of the environmental step: A BayeSN view of the ZTF SN Ia DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    BayeSN analysis of ZTF Type Ia supernovae confirms a ~0.1 mag intrinsic environmental step in standardized brightness that is not explained by differences in dust extinction properties.

  11. Cosmological Dynamics of a Non-Canonical Generalised Brans-Dicke Theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A non-canonical generalized Brans-Dicke theory admits background cosmological solutions matching Lambda CDM characteristics for constant, power-law, and exponential potentials, with dynamics distinct from other scalar...

  12. Noether charges and the first law of thermodynamics for multifractional Schwarzschild black hole in the q-derivative theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Multi-fractional Schwarzschild black holes have profile-insensitive Noether mass and geometric area-law entropy, but require an extended first law with work terms for the q-profile parameters to restore integrability ...

  13. Alleviating the Hubble Tension Using $\Lambda$sCDM Model: A Coupled Dark Energy - Dark Matter Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The ΛsCDM model with coupled dark sectors reduces the Hubble tension to 1.2σ via late-time expansion changes while keeping the early-universe sound horizon nearly unchanged.

  14. Cosmological intercept tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tensions in the supernova intercept a_B at z~0.01 in PantheonPlus and z~0.1 in DES-Y5 point to data systematics or inter-survey inconsistencies rather than new physics, aligning H0 measurements and reducing support fo...

  15. The End of the First Act: Spectral Running, Interacting Dark Radiation, and the Hubble Tension in Light of ACT DR6 Data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Including spectral running α_s, β_s and self-interacting dark radiation relaxes the ACT DR6 bound on ΔN_eff to <0.58 and lowers the Hubble tension to 2.2σ with three extra parameters.

  16. Generalizing the CPL Parametrization through Dark Sector Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dynamical couplings in interacting dark energy models reduce deviations from LambdaCDM to 1.3-1.5 sigma and yield no Bayesian preference over the standard model.

  17. Cosmological Impact of Redshift-Dependent Type Ia Supernovae Calibration

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A phenomenological redshift-dependent SNIa magnitude correction shows no evidence in ΛCDM but is preferred at 4.3σ with dynamical dark energy, reducing Hubble tension to 1.5σ.

  18. A barotropic alternative to Early Dark Energy for alleviating the $H_0$ tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A barotropic fluid with ω_s ≈ 0.29 and Ω_s ≈ 1.5×10^{-5} raises the inferred H0 to match SH0ES while remaining consistent with Planck CMB, DESI BAO, and Pantheon data.

  19. Do equation of state parametrizations of dark energy faithfully capture the dynamics of the late universe?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Node-based reconstruction of cosmic expansion prefers stronger deceleration at z≈1.7 than smooth DE EoS parametrizations, isolating z~1.5-2 as a window where the latter may compress localized kinematic features permit...

  20. Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Planck PR4 CMB data mildly favors dynamical dark energy, but this preference weakens when accounting for possible excess smoothing, indicating the signal may partly arise from data processing issues.

  21. Alleviating the Hubble Tension Using $\Lambda$sCDM Model: A Coupled Dark Energy - Dark Matter Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The ΛsCDM interacting dark sector model reduces the Hubble tension to 1.2σ via late-time energy transfer from dark matter to dark energy while leaving the sound horizon nearly unchanged.

  22. Cosmological constraints on the big bang quantum cosmology model

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The JCDM model yields H0 of 66.95 plus or minus 0.51 km/s/Mpc and Omega_m of 0.3419 plus or minus 0.0065 in a flat universe, rising to H0 of 69.13 plus or minus 0.56 with slight positive curvature, fitting late-time d...

  23. Machine Learning for Multi-messenger Probes of New Physics and Cosmology: A Review and Perspective

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A review summarizing machine learning methods for multi-messenger probes of dark matter and new physics, with a proposed plan for future integrated analyses.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 21 Pith papers · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite,

    L. Amendolaet al., “Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite,”Living Rev. Rel.21 (2018) no. 1, 2, arXiv:1606.00180 [astro-ph.CO]

  2. [2]

    Extragalactic Science, Cosmology and Galactic Archaeology with the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS)

    M. Takada, R. S. Ellis, M. Chiba, J. E. Greene, H. Aihara, N. Arimoto, K. Bundy, J. Cohen, O. Doré, G. Graves, J. E. Gunn, T. Heckman, C. M. Hirata, P. Ho, J.-P. Kneib, O. Le Fèvre, L. Lin, S. More, H. Murayama, T. Nagao, M. Ouchi, M. Seiffert, J. D. Silverman, L. Sodré, D. N. Spergel, M. A. Strauss, H. Sugai, Y. Suto, H. Takami, and R. Wyse, “Extragalact...

  3. [3]

    Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) for the Subaru Telescope: Overview, recent progress, and future perspectives

    N. Tamuraet al., “Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) for the Subaru Telescope: Overview, recent progress, and future perspectives,”Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.9908 (2016) 99081M, arXiv:1608.01075 [astro-ph.IM]

  4. [4]

    Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Rubin Observatory after LSST,

    B. Blumet al., “Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Rubin Observatory after LSST,” inSnowmass 2021

  5. [5]

    arXiv:2203.07220 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [6]

    Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array,

    R. Braun, T. L. Bourke, J. A. Green, E. Keane, and J. Wagg, “Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array,”PoS AASKA14 (2015) 174

  7. [7]

    A Spectroscopic Road Map for Cosmic Frontier: DESI, DESI-II, Stage-5,

    DESI Collaboration, D. J. Schlegelet al., “A Spectroscopic Road Map for Cosmic Frontier: DESI, DESI-II, Stage-5,” arXiv:2209.03585 [astro-ph.CO]

  8. [8]

    4MOST - 4-metre Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope

    R. S. de Jonget al., “4MOST: 4-metre multi-object spectroscopic telescope,” inGround-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, and H. Takami, eds., vol. 8446 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, p. 84460T. 2012.arXiv:1206.6885 [astro-ph.IM]

  9. [9]

    Cosmology with the SPHEREX All-Sky Spectral Survey

    SPHEREx Collaboration, O. Doréet al., “Cosmology with the SPHEREX All-Sky Spectral Survey,” arXiv:1412.4872 [astro-ph.CO]

  10. [10]

    COMAP Early Science: I. Overview,

    K. A. Clearyet al., “COMAP Early Science: I. Overview,”arXiv:2111.05927 [astro-ph.CO]

  11. [11]

    Packed Ultra-wideband Mapping Array (PUMA): A Radio Telescope for Cosmology and Transients,

    PUMA Collaboration, A. Slosaret al., “Packed Ultra-wideband Mapping Array (PUMA): A Radio Telescope for Cosmology and Transients,”Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51 (2019) 53, arXiv:1907.12559 [astro-ph.IM]

  12. [12]

    The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview

    DES Collaboration, T. Abbottet al., “The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.460 (2016) no. 2, 1270–1299,arXiv:1601.00329 [astro-ph.CO]

  13. [13]

    Overview, design, and flight results from SuperBIT: a high-resolution, wide-field, visible-to-near-UV balloon-borne astronomical telescope

    L. J. Romualdezet al., “Overview, design, and flight results from SuperBIT: a high-resolution, wide-field, visible-to-near-UV balloon-borne astronomical telescope,” inGround-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, C. J. Evans, L. Simard, and H. Takami, eds., vol. 10702 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Se...

  14. [14]

    Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope

    B. Sathyaprakashet al., “Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope,”Class. Quant. Grav.29 (2012) 124013, arXiv:1206.0331 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 30, 079501 (2013)]

  15. [15]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    A. Abacet al., “The Science of the Einstein Telescope,”arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

    M. Punturoet al., “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,”Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

  17. [17]

    ETpathfinder: a cryogenic testbed for interferometric gravitational-wave detectors,

    A. Utinaet al., “ETpathfinder: a cryogenic testbed for interferometric gravitational-wave detectors,”Class. Quant. Grav.39 (2022) no. 21, 215008,arXiv:2206.04905 [astro-ph.IM]

  18. [18]

    Listening to the Universe with next generation ground-based 404 gravitational-wave detectors,

    S. Borhanian and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Listening to the Universe with next generation ground-based 404 gravitational-wave detectors,”Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) no. 8, 083040,arXiv:2202.11048 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Characterizing gravitational wave detector networks: from A♯ to cosmic explorer,

    I. Guptaet al., “Characterizing gravitational wave detector networks: from A♯ to cosmic explorer,”Class. Quant. Grav.41 (2024) no. 24, 245001,arXiv:2307.10421 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology,

    TianQin Collaboration, J. Meiet al., “The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology,”PTEP 2021 (2021) no. 5, 05A107,arXiv:2008.10332 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    Fundamental Physics and Cosmology with TianQin,

    J. Luoet al., “Fundamental Physics and Cosmology with TianQin,”arXiv:2502.20138 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    Taiji data challenge for exploring gravitational wave universe,

    Z. Ren, T. Zhao, Z. Cao, Z.-K. Guo, W.-B. Han, H.-B. Jin, and Y.-L. Wu, “Taiji data challenge for exploring gravitational wave universe,”Front. Phys. (Beijing)18 (2023) no. 6, 64302,arXiv:2301.02967 [gr-qc]

  23. [23]

    Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO,

    S. Kawamuraet al., “Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO,”PTEP 2021 (2021) no. 5, 05A105,arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,”Astrophys. J. Lett.951 (2023) no. 1, L8,arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

  25. [25]

    The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Project

    R. N. Manchester, G. Hobbs, M. Bailes, W. A. Coles, W. van Straten, M. J. Keith, R. M. Shannon, N. D. R. Bhat, A. Brown, S. G. Burke-Spolaor, D. J. Champion, A. Chaudhary, R. T. Edwards, G. Hampson, A. W. Hotan, A. Jameson, F. A. Jenet, M. J. Kesteven, J. Khoo, J. Kocz, K. Maciesiak, S. Oslowski, V. Ravi, J. R. Reynolds, J. M. Sarkissian, J. P. W. Verbies...

  26. [26]

    The International Pulsar Timing Array

    R. N. Manchester and IPTA, “The International Pulsar Timing Array,”Classical and Quantum Gravity30 (2013) no. 22, 224010,arXiv:1309.7392 [astro-ph.IM]

  27. [27]

    Science with the Murchison Widefield Array: Phase I results and Phase II opportunities,

    A. P. Beardsleyet al., “Science with the Murchison Widefield Array: Phase I results and Phase II opportunities,”Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.36 (2019) e050, arXiv:1910.02895 [astro-ph.IM]

  28. [28]

    Radio Antenna Design for Sky-Averaged 21cm Cosmology Experiments: The REACH Case,

    J. Cumneret al., “Radio Antenna Design for Sky-Averaged 21cm Cosmology Experiments: The REACH Case,”J. Astron. Inst.11 (2022) no. 01, 2250001,arXiv:2109.10098 [astro-ph.IM]

  29. [29]

    The GMRT 150 MHz All-sky Radio Survey: First Alternative Data Release TGSS ADR1

    H. T. Intema, P. Jagannathan, K. P. Mooley, and D. A. Frail, “The GMRT 150 MHz All-sky Radio Survey: First Alternative Data Release TGSS ADR1,”Astron. Astrophys.598 (2017) A78, arXiv:1603.04368 [astro-ph.CO]

  30. [30]

    The Five-Hundred-Meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope (FAST) Project

    R. Nan, D. Li, C. Jin, Q. Wang, L. Zhu, W. Zhu, H. Zhang, Y. Yue, and L. Qian, “The Five-Hundred Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope (fast) Project,”International Journal of Modern Physics D20 (2011) no. 6, 989–1024, arXiv:1105.3794 [astro-ph.IM]

  31. [31]

    The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives

    M. J. Grahamet al., “The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives,”Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.131 (2019) no. 1001, 078001,arXiv:1902.01945 [astro-ph.IM]

  32. [32]

    The Nearby Supernova Factory

    W. M. Wood-Vaseyet al., “The nearby supernova factory,”New Astron. Rev.48 (2004) 637–640, arXiv:astro-ph/0401513

  33. [33]

    ATLAS Probe: Breakthrough Science of Galaxy Evolution, Cosmology, Milky Way, and the Solar System,

    Y. Wanget al., “ATLAS Probe: Breakthrough Science of Galaxy Evolution, Cosmology, Milky Way, and the Solar System,”arXiv:1909.00070 [astro-ph.IM]

  34. [34]

    The Science Case for the European ELT,

    I. Hook, “The Science Case for the European ELT,” inScience with the VLT in the ELT Era, A. Moorwood, ed., vol. 9 of Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, p. 225. 2009

  35. [35]

    Key early science with MANIFEST on GMT

    M. Colless, “Key early science with MANIFEST on GMT,”arXiv e-prints(2018) arXiv:1809.05804, arXiv:1809.05804 [astro-ph.IM]

  36. [36]

    Thirty Meter Telescope Detailed Science Case: 2015,

    TMT International Science Development Teams & TMT Science Advisory CommitteeCollaboration, W. Skidmoreet al., “Thirty Meter Telescope Detailed Science Case: 2015,”Res. Astron. Astrophys.15 (2015) no. 12, 1945–2140,arXiv:1505.01195 [astro-ph.IM]

  37. [37]

    E. V. L. Telescope,The VLT White Book. European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, 1988. https://www.eso.org/public/products/books/book_0004/

  38. [38]

    Parque Astron\'omico de Atacama: An ideal site for millimeter, submillimeter, and mid-infrared astronomy

    R. Bustos, M. Rubio, A. Otárola, and N. Nagar, “Parque Astronómico de Atacama: An Ideal Site for Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Mid-Infrared Astronomy,”PASP126 (2014) no. 946, 1126,arXiv:1410.2451 [astro-ph.IM]

  39. [39]

    Science Objectives and Early Results of the DEEP2 Redshift Survey

    M. Daviset al., “Science objectives and early results of the DEEP2 redshift survey,”Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 4834 (2003) 161–172,arXiv:astro-ph/0209419

  40. [40]

    Science with ASKAP - the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder

    S. Johnston and J. Wall, “Science with ASKAP - the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder,”Exper. Astron. 22 (2008) 151, arXiv:0810.5187 [astro-ph]

  41. [41]

    The UTMOST: A hybrid digital signal processor transforms the MOST

    M. Bailes, A. Jameson, C. Flynn, T. Bateman, E. D. Barr, S. Bhandari, J. D. Bunton, M. Caleb, D. Campbell-Wilson, W. Farah, B. Gaensler, A. J. Green, R. W. Hunstead, F. Jankowski, E. F. Keane, V. V. Krishnan, T. Murphy, M. O’Neill, S. Osłowski, A. Parthasarathy, V. Ravi, P. Rosado, and D. Temby, “The UTMOST: A Hybrid Digital Signal Processor Transforms th...

  42. [42]

    The MeerKAT Radio Telescope,

    J. Jonas and MeerKAT Team, “The MeerKAT Radio Telescope,” inMeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA, p. 1. 2016

  43. [43]

    Deep Synoptic Array Science: First FRB and Host Galaxy Catalog,

    C. J. Lawet al., “Deep Synoptic Array Science: First FRB and Host Galaxy Catalog,”Astrophys. J.967 (2024) no. 1, 29, arXiv:2307.03344 [astro-ph.HE]

  44. [44]

    The VLA Low-band Ionosphere and Transient Experiment (VLITE),

    T. Clarke, W. Peters, W. Brisken, S. Giacintucci, N. Kassim, E. Polisensky, J. Helmboldt, E. E. Richards, A. Erickson, P. S. Ray, M. T. Kerr, J. Deneva, W. Coburn, R. Huber, and J. Long, “The VLA Low-band Ionosphere and Transient Experiment (VLITE),” inAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #231, vol. 231 ofAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting A...

  45. [45]

    The DSA-2000: the future of radio survey science,

    G. Hallinan and DSA-2000 collaboration, “The DSA-2000: the future of radio survey science,” inAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, vol. 241 ofAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, p. 239.07. 2023

  46. [46]

    Apercal-The Apertif calibration pipeline,

    B. Adebahret al., “Apercal-The Apertif calibration pipeline,”Astronomy and Computing38 (2022) 100514, arXiv:2112.03722 [astro-ph.IM]

  47. [47]

    The Canadian Hydrogen Observatory and Radio-transient Detector (CHORD),

    K. Vanderlinde, A. Liu, B. Gaensler, D. Bond, G. Hinshaw, C. Ng, C. Chiang, I. Stairs, J.-A. Brown, J. Sievers, J. Mena, K. Smith, K. Bandura, K. Masui, K. Spekkens, L. Belostotski, M. Dobbs, N. Turok, P. Boyle, M. Rupen, T. Landecker, U.-L. Pen, and V. Kaspi, “The Canadian Hydrogen Observatory and Radio-transient Detector (CHORD),” inCanadian Long Range ...

  48. [48]

    The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX): Description and Early Pilot Survey Results

    G. J. Hillet al., “The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX): Description and Early Pilot Survey Results,”ASP Conf. Ser.399 (2008) 115–118,arXiv:0806.0183 [astro-ph]

  49. [49]

    CONCERTO: Instrument and status,

    A. Fasanoet al., “CONCERTO: Instrument and status,”EPJ Web Conf.293 (2024) 00018, arXiv:2311.04704 [astro-ph.IM]

  50. [50]

    TIME: the Tomographic Ionized-carbon Mapping Experiment: an update on design, characterization, and data from the 2022 commissioning observations,

    V. L. Butleret al., “TIME: the Tomographic Ionized-carbon Mapping Experiment: an update on design, characterization, and data from the 2022 commissioning observations,” inMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XII, J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, eds., vol. 13102 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engi...

  51. [51]

    CDIM: Cosmic Dawn Intensity Mapper Final Report

    A. Cooray, T.-C. Chang, S. Unwin, M. Zemcov, A. Coffey, P. Morrissey, N. Raouf, S. Lipscy, M. Shannon, G. Wu, R. Cen, R. R. Chary, O. Doré, X. Fan, G. G. Fazio, S. L. Finkelstein, C. Heneka, B. Lee, P. Linden, H. Nayyeri, J. Rhodes, R. Sadoun, M. B. Silva, H. Trac, H.-Y. Wu, and Z. Zheng, “Cosmic Dawn Intensity Mapper,” inBulletin of the American Astronom...

  52. [52]

    CCAT-prime: Science with an Ultra-widefield Submillimeter Observatory at Cerro Chajnantor

    G. J. Staceyet al., “CCAT-prime: Science with an Ultra-widefield Submillimeter Observatory at Cerro Chajnantor,” in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VII. 2018. arXiv:1807.04354 [astro-ph.GA]

  53. [53]

    The Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA): Design, Technical Overview and Performance

    W. Sutherland, J. Emerson, G. Dalton, E. Atad-Ettedgui, S. Beard, R. Bennett, N. Bezawada, A. Born, M. Caldwell, P. Clark, S. Craig, D. Henry, P. Jeffers, B. Little, A. McPherson, J. Murray, M. Stewart, B. Stobie, D. Terrett, K. Ward, M. Whalley, and G. Woodhouse, “The Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA): Design, technical overview...

  54. [54]

    The limits of cosmology: role of the Moon,

    J. Silk, “The limits of cosmology: role of the Moon,”Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.379 (2021) 20190561, arXiv:2011.04671 [astro-ph.CO] . 406 White Paper Authors Eleonora Di Valentino,1 Jackson Levi Said,2,3 Adam Riess,4,5 Agnieszka Pollo,6 Vivian Poulin,7 Adrià Gómez-Valent,8 Amanda Weltman,9 Antonella Palmese,10 Caroline D. Huang,11 Carsten van de...