pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.05896 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

An updated model for the Perseus Spiral Arm from Trigonometric Parallax and 3-dimensional kinematic distances of distant massive stars

Lucas J. Hyland , Mark J. Reid , Simon P. Ellingsen , Andreas Brunthaler , Xing-Wu Zheng , Karl M. Menten This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 15:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Perseus spiral armtrigonometric parallaxVLBA masersgalactic structurespiral armsMilky Way kinematicslogarithmic spiral
0
0 comments X

The pith

New maser parallaxes refine the Perseus arm and show it intersects the Sagittarius arm beyond the galactic center at 5.6 kpc radius and 200 degrees azimuth.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents new trigonometric parallaxes and proper motions for three water masers and one methanol maser measured with the VLBA. These measurements, combined with three-dimensional kinematic distances, allow a refined fit to the location and pitch angle of the Perseus spiral arm in the first galactic quadrant. The authors then extrapolate both the Perseus and Sagittarius arms as logarithmic spirals past the galactic center. This leads to the finding that the two arms cross at a Galactocentric radius of about 5.6 kpc and an azimuth of 200 degrees. A sympathetic reader would care because an accurate map of the Milky Way's spiral arms improves predictions of where stars form and how the galaxy's overall structure evolved.

Core claim

Incorporating trigonometric parallaxes and proper motions for masers with 3-dimensional kinematic distances, we refine the position and pitch angle of the Perseus spiral arm in the first galactic quadrant. Extrapolating the Perseus and Sagittarius arm locations to beyond the Galactic Center, we find that they intersect at an approximate Galactocentric azimuth of 200 degrees and radius of 5.6 kpc.

What carries the argument

Logarithmic spiral fits to the Perseus and Sagittarius arms, updated with new VLBA parallax measurements of masers that provide direct distances and proper motions.

If this is right

  • The refined Perseus arm pitch angle and position improve distance estimates for other star-forming regions in the outer Milky Way.
  • The intersection point provides a specific location where arm dynamics could affect gas flows and star formation.
  • The model supplies a template for extrapolating other galactic arms such as the Norma arm using similar methods.
  • Future observations of distant massive stars can be compared directly against the predicted arm loci to test consistency.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the intersection holds, it may mark a region where gravitational interactions between arms compress gas and trigger new star clusters.
  • The constant-pitch assumption could be tested by mapping arm segments on the far side of the galaxy with next-generation radio arrays.
  • Similar extrapolations might reveal whether the Milky Way's spiral pattern is symmetric or contains localized distortions from the central bar.

Load-bearing premise

The spiral arms maintain a constant pitch angle and can be reliably continued as smooth logarithmic spirals across the galactic center without major bends or disruptions.

What would settle it

A precise distance and position measurement of a massive star or maser near the predicted crossing point that places it more than 0.5 kpc away from 5.6 kpc radius at 200 degrees azimuth would contradict the extrapolated intersection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.05896 by Andreas Brunthaler, Karl M. Menten, Lucas J. Hyland, Mark J. Reid, Simon P. Ellingsen, Xing-Wu Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Parallaxes and proper motion fits for G021.87+00.01, G037.82+00.41, G060.57–00.18, and G070.29+01.60. Filled and open symbols represent motion with respect to different reference quasars in the order they appear in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example of the distance determination process for G070.29+01.60. The Vlsr PDF (dashed-red) and µl∗, µb (dashed-blue, cyan) proper motion PDFs are multiplied to￾gether to give the 3D kinematic distance PDF (magenta). This is then multiplied by the parallax PDF (green) to give the final PDF (black), the peak of which gives the maximum likelihood distance. purely the parallaxes) for seven masers3 , to avoid i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of parallax distance with maximum likelihood distance in the Galactocentric coordinates frame. Left: Parallax-only distances (blue). Right: Maximum likelihood distances, based on parallax and 3DKD (black). The solid line is the single-segment arm fit from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: The log-periodic spiral arm fits. The shaded area shows the estimated Perseus arm widths. Right: Plan view of the Milky Way. In both plots, the dashed lines are the spiral arm fits for the Outer (red), Perseus (black), Local (cyan), Sagittarian-Carina (magenta), and Scutum-Centaurus (blue) arms, from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report trigonometric parallaxes and proper motions for three water masers and one methanol maser obtained with the VLBA as part of the BeSSeL Survey. Incorporating these parallaxes with 3-dimensional kinematic distances, we refine the position and pitch angle of the Perseus spiral arm in the 1$^\mathrm{st}$ Galactic quadrant. Extrapolating the Perseus and Sagittarius arm locations to beyond the Galactic Center, we find that they intersect at an approximate Galactocentric azimuth of ${200^\circ}$ and radius of $5.6$~kpc.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports new VLBA trigonometric parallaxes and proper motions for three water masers and one methanol maser from the BeSSeL Survey. These are combined with 3-dimensional kinematic distances to refine the position and pitch angle of the Perseus spiral arm in the first Galactic quadrant. The Perseus and Sagittarius arms are then extrapolated as logarithmic spirals beyond the Galactic Center, with the authors reporting an intersection at Galactocentric azimuth of approximately 200° and radius 5.6 kpc.

Significance. If the extrapolation holds, the work supplies updated near-side constraints on the Perseus arm from fresh parallax data and offers a specific, falsifiable prediction for the far-side arm geometry. The new maser measurements add direct distance anchors that can be compared against prior models. The result's broader impact on Milky Way spiral structure studies would be moderate, as it extends existing logarithmic-arm frameworks rather than introducing new dynamical insights.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported intersection at azimuth 200° and R=5.6 kpc rests entirely on the assumption that both arms can be continued as constant-pitch logarithmic spirals across the Galactic Center. No far-side trigonometric parallaxes or kinematic distances are presented to anchor this extension, and the text does not quantify how bar-driven perturbations (known to affect arm geometry) would propagate into the extrapolated parameters over ~180° of azimuth.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the description of how the new parallaxes are merged with kinematic distances omits the number of sources retained, selection cuts, and error-propagation procedure, making it difficult to judge the precision of the updated pitch angle.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the pitch-angle values adopted for each arm and the functional form of the logarithmic spiral used in the extrapolation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The primary advance in our work is the new VLBA parallaxes that tighten constraints on the Perseus arm in the first quadrant; the far-side intersection is presented explicitly as an extrapolation under the standard logarithmic-spiral assumption. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported intersection at azimuth 200° and R=5.6 kpc rests entirely on the assumption that both arms can be continued as constant-pitch logarithmic spirals across the Galactic Center. No far-side trigonometric parallaxes or kinematic distances are presented to anchor this extension, and the text does not quantify how bar-driven perturbations (known to affect arm geometry) would propagate into the extrapolated parameters over ~180° of azimuth.

    Authors: We agree that the reported intersection is derived solely from extrapolating the updated Perseus and Sagittarius arm parameters as constant-pitch logarithmic spirals across the Galactic Center. No far-side trigonometric parallaxes or kinematic distances are available to us, and the manuscript does not claim otherwise; the intersection is offered as a model prediction under this common assumption. We will revise the abstract and discussion sections to state the assumption more explicitly and to note the absence of far-side anchors. Regarding bar-driven perturbations, we acknowledge that such effects can alter arm geometry, but a quantitative assessment of their propagation over ~180° of azimuth would require dedicated hydrodynamic or N-body simulations of the Milky Way bar, which lies outside the scope of this primarily observational paper. We will add a concise paragraph in the discussion that flags this source of uncertainty and its potential impact on the extrapolated parameters. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A quantitative propagation of bar-driven perturbations into the extrapolated arm parameters over ~180° azimuth, which would require new dynamical modeling beyond the present observational analysis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses new data to fit parameters then applies explicit extrapolation model

full rationale

The paper reports fresh VLBA trigonometric parallaxes and proper motions for four masers, combines them with 3D kinematic distances to fit the Perseus arm's position and pitch angle in the first quadrant, and then extrapolates both Perseus and Sagittarius arms as logarithmic spirals with constant pitch to locate their intersection. No equation or step reduces the claimed intersection coordinates to the input data by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation whose validity is presupposed by the present work. The constant-pitch assumption is stated as an explicit modeling choice rather than derived tautologically from the observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model update rests on standard galactic coordinate systems and the assumption of logarithmic spiral geometry for arm extrapolation; new data points are added but no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Perseus arm pitch angle
    Refined using the new parallax and kinematic data points, implying adjustment to fit the observations.
  • Perseus arm position parameters
    Updated location in the first Galactic quadrant based on the four new maser measurements.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Galactic arms follow logarithmic spiral geometry
    Invoked for the extrapolation of arm locations beyond the Galactic Center to predict the intersection.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5422 in / 1227 out tokens · 49259 ms · 2026-05-15T15:50:34.954999+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1989, in NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C, Vol

    Alef, W. 1989, in NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C, Vol. 283, Techniques and Applications of Very Long Baseline Interferometry, ed. M. Felli & R. E. Spencer, 261–274, doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-2428-4 13

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2428-4 1989

  2. [2]

    2010, ApJ, 721, 267, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/267

    Asaki, Y., Deguchi, S., Imai, H., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 267, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/267

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/721/1/267 2010

  3. [3]

    J., & Conway, J

    Beasley, A. J., & Conway, J. E. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 82, Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, ed. J. A

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    B., Wu, Y

    Bian, S. B., Wu, Y. W., Xu, Y., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 267, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad4030 Perseus-Sagittarius Arm Merge9 Maser Nameπ µ x µy Vlsr Dπ d3Dk dML Ref† (mas) (mas/yr) (mas/yr) (km s −1) (kpc) (kpc) (kpc) G001.00−00.23(C) 0.090±0.057−3.87±0.28−6.23±0.56 +2.0±5.0 11.10 +8.70 −3.47 13.95+3.62 −5.76 13.90+3.29 −3.50 24 G021.87+00.01(H) 0.174±0.126−3....

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad4030 2024

  5. [5]

    J., Menten, K

    Brunthaler, A., Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., et al. 2011, Astronomische Nachrichten, 332, 461, doi: 10.1002/asna.201111560

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.201111560 2011

  6. [6]

    2016, MNRAS, 460, 283, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw958

    Omodaka, T. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 283, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw958

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw958 2016

  7. [7]

    A., Imai, H., Handa, T., et al

    Burns, R. A., Imai, H., Handa, T., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 3163, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1836

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1836 2015

  8. [8]

    A., Handa, T., Imai, H., et al

    Burns, R. A., Handa, T., Imai, H., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 2367, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx216

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx216 2017

  9. [9]

    K., Hachisuka, K., Reid, M

    Choi, Y. K., Hachisuka, K., Reid, M. J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 99, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/99

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/99 2014

  10. [10]

    Codella, C., Palumbo, G. G. C., Pareschi, G., et al. 1995, MNRAS, 276, 57, doi: 10.1093/mnras/276.1.57

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/276.1.57 1995

  11. [11]

    The Milky Way in Molecular Clouds: A New Complete CO Survey

    Dame, T. M., Hartmann, D., & Thaddeus, P. 2001, ApJ, 547, 792, doi: 10.1086/318388

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/318388 2001

  12. [12]

    T., Brisken, W

    Deller, A. T., Brisken, W. F., Phillips, C. J., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 275, doi: 10.1086/658907

    work page doi:10.1086/658907 2011

  13. [13]

    D., et al

    Do, T., Hees, A., Ghez, A., et al. 2019, Science, 365, 664, doi: 10.1126/science.aav8137

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aav8137 2019

  14. [14]

    1977, A&AS, 30, 145 —

    Genzel, R., & Downes, D. 1977, A&AS, 30, 145 —. 1979, A&A, 72, 234

    work page 1977

  15. [15]

    R., Ginsburg, A., Meier, D

    Georgelin, Y. M., & Georgelin, Y. P. 1976, A&A, 49, 57 GRAVITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935656

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935656 1976

  16. [16]

    A., Breen, S

    Green, J. A., Breen, S. L., Fuller, G. A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 1383, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx887

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx887 2017

  17. [17]

    Greisen, E. W. 2003, in Astrophysics and Space Science

    work page 2003

  18. [18]

    285, Information Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, ed

    Library, Vol. 285, Information Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, ed. A. Heck, 109, doi: 10.1007/0-306-48080-8 7

    work page doi:10.1007/0-306-48080-8

  19. [19]

    2012, PASJ, 64, 136, doi: 10.1093/pasj/64.6.136

    Honma, M., Nagayama, T., Ando, K., et al. 2012, PASJ, 64, 136, doi: 10.1093/pasj/64.6.136

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/64.6.136 2012

  20. [20]

    J., Ellingsen, S

    Hyland, L. J., Ellingsen, S. P., & Reid, M. J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.16998, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.16998

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.16998 2025

  21. [21]

    J., Reid, M

    Hyland, L. J., Reid, M. J., Orosz, G., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdbc5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdbc5 2023

  22. [22]

    2012, PASJ, 64, 142, doi: 10.1093/pasj/64.6.142

    Imai, H., Sakai, N., Nakanishi, H., et al. 2012, PASJ, 64, 142, doi: 10.1093/pasj/64.6.142

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/64.6.142 2012

  23. [23]

    Kalberla, P. M. W., Burton, W. B., Hartmann, D., et al. 2005, A&A, 440, 775, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041864

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041864 2005

  24. [24]

    H., Hughes, J

    Kaplan, G. H., Hughes, J. A., Seidelmann, P. K., Smith, C. A., & Yallop, B. D. 1989, AJ, 97, 1197, doi: 10.1086/115063

    work page doi:10.1086/115063 1989

  25. [25]

    2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Cotton, B. 2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 351, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV, ed. C. Gabriel, C. Arviset, D. Ponz, & S. Enrique, 497

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    J., Dame, T

    Kumar, J., Reid, M. J., Dame, T. M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 185, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb70f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb70f 2025

  27. [27]

    2013, ApJ, 774, 107, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/107

    Kusuno, K., Asaki, Y., Imai, H., & Oyama, T. 2013, ApJ, 774, 107, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/107

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/774/2/107 2013

  28. [28]

    2011, PASJ, 63, 1345, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.6.1345

    Matsumoto, N., Honma, M., Isono, Y., et al. 2011, PASJ, 63, 1345, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.6.1345

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/63.6.1345 2011

  29. [29]

    J., Mioduszewski, A

    Melis, C., Reid, M. J., Mioduszewski, A. J., Stauffer, J. R., & Bower, G. C. 2014, Science, 345, 1029, doi: 10.1126/science.1256101

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1256101 2014

  30. [30]

    A., Claussen, M

    Moellenbrock, G. A., Claussen, M. J., & Goss, W. M. 2009, ApJ, 694, 192, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/192

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/694/1/192 2009

  31. [31]

    J., Menten, K

    Moscadelli, L., Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 693, 406, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/406

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/1/406 2009

  32. [32]

    2010, ApJ, 716, 1356, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1356

    Moscadelli, L., Xu, Y., & Chen, X. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1356, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1356

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/2/1356 2010

  33. [33]

    2020, PASJ, 72, 52, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaa034

    Nagayama, T., Kobayashi, H., Hirota, T., et al. 2020, PASJ, 72, 52, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaa034

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa034 2020

  34. [34]

    2015, PASJ, 67, 68, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psv012

    Nakanishi, H., Sakai, N., Kurayama, T., et al. 2015, PASJ, 67, 68, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psv012

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psv012 2015

  35. [35]

    2011, PASJ, 63, 9, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.1.9

    Niinuma, K., Nagayama, T., Hirota, T., et al. 2011, PASJ, 63, 9, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.1.9

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/63.1.9 2011

  36. [36]

    S., Kobayashi, H., Honma, M., et al

    Oh, C. S., Kobayashi, H., Honma, M., et al. 2010, PASJ, 62, 101, doi: 10.1093/pasj/62.1.101

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/62.1.101 2010

  37. [37]

    1996, MNRAS, 281, 27, doi: 10.1093/mnras/278.1.27

    Persic, M., Salucci, P., & Stel, F. 1996, MNRAS, 281, 27, doi: 10.1093/mnras/278.1.27

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/278.1.27 1996

  38. [38]

    Reid, M. J. 2022, AJ, 164, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac80bb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac80bb 2022

  39. [39]

    J., Dame, T

    Reid, M. J., Dame, T. M., Menten, K. M., & Brunthaler, A. 2016, ApJ, 823, 77, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/77

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/77 2016

  40. [40]

    J., Menten, K

    Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 693, 397, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/397 —. 2014, ApJ, 783, 130, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/130 —. 2019, ApJ, 885, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/1/397 2009

  41. [41]

    Rygl, K. L. J., Brunthaler, A., Reid, M. J., et al. 2010, A&A, 511, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913135

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913135 2010

  42. [42]

    2012, PASJ, 64, 108, doi: 10.1093/pasj/64.5.108

    Sakai, N., Honma, M., Nakanishi, H., et al. 2012, PASJ, 64, 108, doi: 10.1093/pasj/64.5.108

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/64.5.108 2012

  43. [43]

    2022, PASJ, 74, 209, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab118

    Sakai, N., Nakanishi, H., Kurahara, K., et al. 2022, PASJ, 74, 209, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab118

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psab118 2022

  44. [44]

    Dame, T. M. 2019, ApJ, 876, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab12e0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab12e0 2019

  45. [45]

    2008, PASJ, 60, 975, doi: 10.1093/pasj/60.5.975

    Sato, M., Hirota, T., Honma, M., et al. 2008, PASJ, 60, 975, doi: 10.1093/pasj/60.5.975

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/60.5.975 2008

  46. [46]

    2011, PASJ, 63, 1219, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.6.1219

    Shiozaki, S., Imai, H., Tafoya, D., et al. 2011, PASJ, 63, 1219, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.6.1219

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/63.6.1219 2011

  47. [47]

    2011, PASJ, 63, 813, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.4.813

    Sofue, Y. 2011, PASJ, 63, 813, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.4.813

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/63.4.813 2011

  48. [48]

    Szymczak, M., Hrynek, G., & Kus, A. J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 269, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000334 Perseus-Sagittarius Arm Merge11 VERA Collaboration, Hirota, T., Nagayama, T., et al. 2020, PASJ, 72, 50, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaa018

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:2000334 2000

  49. [49]

    J., Liu, D

    Xu, Y., Hao, C. J., Liu, D. J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 947, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc45c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc45c 2023

  50. [50]

    J., Zheng, X

    Xu, Y., Reid, M. J., Zheng, X. W., & Menten, K. M. 2006, Science, 311, 54, doi: 10.1126/science.1120914

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1120914 2006

  51. [51]

    2016, PASJ, 68, 60, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw058

    Yamauchi, A., Yamashita, K., Honma, M., et al. 2016, PASJ, 68, 60, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw058

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psw058 2016

  52. [52]

    J., Menten, K

    Zhang, B., Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/79

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/1/79 2013

  53. [53]

    J., Zhang, L., et al

    Zhang, B., Reid, M. J., Zhang, L., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 200, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab141d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab141d 2019