pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.07481 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

New Way to Date Globular Clusters: Brown Dwarf Cooling Sequences

Roman Gerasimov
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 15:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords globular clustersbrown dwarfsage determinationJWST photometrycooling sequencesstellar evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Brown dwarf cooling sequences observed with JWST can date nearby globular clusters with formal age errors under 0.2 Gyr.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a likelihood-based method that uses multi-band JWST photometry of brown dwarfs near and below the hydrogen-burning limit to measure globular cluster ages. Traditional dating methods often disagree by more than 1 Gyr, so this approach supplies an independent consistency check with its own set of systematics. Simulations of realistic observations demonstrate that measurement uncertainties alone can deliver formal age precisions below 0.2 Gyr for nearby clusters. The work also quantifies how multiple stellar populations, unresolved binaries, and uncertainties in brown dwarf cooling rates propagate into the final error budget. A lookup table is supplied so observers can plan the number of exposures and time baselines needed for any target precision.

Core claim

A histogram-free likelihood fit to the cooling sequences of brown dwarf cluster members in multiple JWST bands yields globular cluster ages, and simulated observations establish that formal errors based on measurement uncertainties alone fall below 0.2 Gyr for nearby clusters.

What carries the argument

A likelihood model that treats cluster age as a free parameter while fitting the observed multi-band photometry of stars near and below the hydrogen-burning limit to theoretical brown dwarf cooling tracks.

If this is right

  • The method supplies ages with a largely independent set of systematic errors that can test more established dating techniques.
  • Systematic contributions from chemical heterogeneity, binaries, and cooling-rate uncertainties dominate the total error budget and can exceed the formal errors by more than an order of magnitude.
  • Observers can consult the provided lookup table to determine the number of observations, exposure times, and temporal baselines required for any desired age precision.
  • More sophisticated modeling of multiple populations and binaries can reduce the systematic floor and improve the attainable accuracy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Precise ages for the oldest clusters would tighten constraints on the timing of the Milky Way's earliest star-formation episodes.
  • Persistent mismatches with other age indicators could reveal shortcomings in current brown dwarf evolutionary models.
  • Applying the technique to clusters at larger distances would test how far the required photometric depth and baseline can be pushed before systematics overwhelm the formal precision.

Load-bearing premise

Brown dwarf cooling rates are known to sufficient accuracy and the effects of multiple stellar populations and unresolved binaries can be adequately modeled or marginalized over in the likelihood fit.

What would settle it

Deriving an age from the brown dwarf sequence in a nearby globular cluster that differs by more than 0.2 Gyr from independent methods even after explicit correction for known systematics would falsify the claimed precision.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.07481 by Roman Gerasimov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Simulated luminosity function of a globular cluster with the metallicity and distance similar to those of 47 Tuc. Individual subplots show the evolution of the luminosity function with cluster age (age increases from left to right). The horizontal axis displays the apparent magnitude in the F322W2 band of the Near Infrared Camera on JWST. In the legend, “BDs” refers to brown dwarfs. The vertical axis is sc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Theoretical mass-luminosity relationships (left) and color-magnitude diagrams (right), extracted from the SANDee stellar models for the average chemical composition of 47 Tuc. The “true” hydrogen-burning limit (HBL) of 0.077 M⊙ is shown for reference, as defined in Gerasimov et al. [190]. 2.3. Mass function The mass function of the globular cluster determines the expected star/brown dwarf ratio in the obse… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top left: expected errors in the inferred proper motion (PM) of cluster members from NIRCam images as functions of the F322W2 magnitude, for different observing strategies. The intrinsic scatter in proper motion among cluster members (0.5 mas yr−1) is shown with a horizontal line. Bottom left: expected errors in photometry for the two photometric bands considered in this study. Note that the expected error… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: estimated completeness of the observed luminosity function of 47 Tuc for different observing strategies. In the legend, observing strategies are denoted in the same way as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Model luminosity functions for 47 Tuc in F322W2 (left) and F150W2 (right) JWST NIRCam bands. The top, middle and bottom subplots show the effect of cluster age, high-mass power law slope and low-mass power law slope (see Equation 1) on the luminosity function, respectively. The vertical axis is linear and has arbitrary normalization. The likelihood of compatibility (ℒ) between the observed magnitudes of cl… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Expected random errors and systematic offsets in the measurements of the age and mass function parameters of 47 Tuc from its brown dwarf cooling sequence. Note that the systematic offsets shown here include only algorithmic errors (see text). Physical systematic effects dominate the error budget, and are considered in Section 4. The results are shown for 4 observing strategies with JWST NIRCam that corresp… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Expected systematic effects in globular cluster ages inferred from their brown dwarf cooling sequences. Each effect is represented with a marker, centered at the modal offset from the true age induced by the systematic effect, and with error bars representing the expected spread in best-fit age due to the systematic effect. “Base” refers to the baseline case without any systematic effects. For reference, t… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Examples of color-magnitude diagrams from simulated observations of 47 Tuc with JWST NIRCam. Left: simulation without multiple populations (MP). All members are assumed to have the mean 𝛼-enhancement, [𝛼∕Fe] ≈ 0.17. Middle: “fixed” simulation, where the distribution of [𝛼∕Fe] is set to match the spectroscopic measurements of [O∕Fe] in bright members. Right: “mass-dependent” simulation, where the distributi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: relationship between the number of observed age-sensitive objects (brown dwarfs and low-mass stars immediately above the hydrogen-burning limit), ℬ, and the expected formal error in inferred cluster age. The color-coded observing strategies are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

As the oldest building blocks of our Galaxy, globular clusters retain the archaeological footprint of the early stellar environments. Accurate absolute ages of globular clusters are required to interpret this ancient record. Existing dating techniques often produce precise but discordant ages, suggestive of systematic errors in excess of 1 Gyr. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has unlocked a new dating method that leverages the cooling behavior of previously unobservable brown dwarf members. With a largely independent set of systematic errors, this new method provides a new consistency test for more established methodologies. I present a likelihood-based histogram-free method to derive globular cluster ages from multi-band JWST photometry of cluster members near and below the hydrogen-burning limit. By applying the method to a large set of simulated observations, I establish that formal age errors (i.e. errors based on measurement uncertainties alone) under 0.2 Gyr are attainable for nearby globular clusters. I also evaluate the significance of associated systematic effects, including the chemical heterogeneity of globular clusters (multiple populations), unresolved binary systems and uncertainties in brown dwarf cooling rates. As with other methods of age determination, systematic effects dominate the error budget (in selected cases, by over an order of magnitude), but may be reduced with more sophisticated analysis. Finally, I provide a lookup table for determining the number of observations, exposure times and temporal baselines required to estimate the age of a given cluster to a prescribed precision.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a likelihood-based, histogram-free method to derive globular cluster ages from multi-band JWST photometry of members near and below the hydrogen-burning limit. Using a large set of simulated observations, it claims that formal age errors (measurement uncertainties only) below 0.2 Gyr are attainable for nearby clusters. The work evaluates systematic effects from multiple stellar populations, unresolved binaries, and brown dwarf cooling-rate uncertainties, notes that systematics typically dominate the error budget (sometimes by more than an order of magnitude), and supplies a lookup table for the number of observations, exposure times, and baselines needed to reach a target precision.

Significance. If the formal precisions can be realized with real data and if cooling-model uncertainties can be adequately controlled or marginalized, the method would supply a valuable independent consistency check on globular-cluster ages whose current discrepancies exceed 1 Gyr. The simulation framework that quantifies formal errors and the provision of a practical observational lookup table are concrete strengths that would aid observers planning JWST programs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulations section] Simulations section: the reported formal errors <0.2 Gyr are obtained only when the cooling sequences used to generate the mock photometry are identical to those used in the likelihood fit. The manuscript states that cooling-rate uncertainties can exceed the formal error by more than an order of magnitude, yet no recovery tests are shown in which the cooling tracks are perturbed within current theoretical uncertainties; without such tests the attainable total precision remains undemonstrated.
  2. [Systematic-effects evaluation] Systematic-effects evaluation: while the impacts of multiple populations, binaries, and cooling uncertainties are discussed qualitatively, no explicit combined error budget is presented that propagates these systematics into a total age uncertainty for any specific cluster. This omission makes it difficult to judge whether the method can actually compete with existing techniques once all error sources are included.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a clearer upfront statement that the sub-0.2 Gyr figure refers exclusively to formal (measurement-only) errors and that total errors are expected to be substantially larger.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments highlight important gaps in demonstrating the method's robustness against model uncertainties and in quantifying the total error budget. We address each point below and will implement the suggested revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Simulations section: the reported formal errors <0.2 Gyr are obtained only when the cooling sequences used to generate the mock photometry are identical to those used in the likelihood fit. The manuscript states that cooling-rate uncertainties can exceed the formal error by more than an order of magnitude, yet no recovery tests are shown in which the cooling tracks are perturbed within current theoretical uncertainties; without such tests the attainable total precision remains undemonstrated.

    Authors: We agree that the formal errors are conditional on identical cooling models for data generation and fitting. Although the manuscript notes that cooling-rate uncertainties can dominate, we did not perform explicit recovery tests with perturbed tracks. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection to the Simulations section that includes recovery tests in which cooling tracks are perturbed within published theoretical uncertainties (e.g., variations in opacity, atmospheric chemistry, and radius evolution drawn from Burrows et al. 2001 and subsequent updates). These tests will be shown in an additional figure and will quantify the degradation in recovered age precision, thereby demonstrating the attainable total precision more completely. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Systematic-effects evaluation: while the impacts of multiple populations, binaries, and cooling uncertainties are discussed qualitatively, no explicit combined error budget is presented that propagates these systematics into a total age uncertainty for any specific cluster. This omission makes it difficult to judge whether the method can actually compete with existing techniques once all error sources are included.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative, combined error budget for a representative cluster would improve the manuscript. The original text evaluates each systematic effect separately and supplies a lookup table based on formal errors. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection that constructs an explicit total error budget for a specific nearby cluster (e.g., NGC 6397), combining the contributions from multiple populations, unresolved binaries, and cooling-rate uncertainties using the values already derived in the paper and the observational lookup table. This combined budget will be presented in a new table and will allow direct comparison with the precision of established age-dating methods. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: statistical precision shown via standard simulation validation

full rationale

The paper presents a likelihood-based method for fitting globular cluster ages to multi-band JWST photometry near the hydrogen-burning limit, using brown dwarf cooling sequences. The central claim of attainable formal (measurement-only) errors below 0.2 Gyr is demonstrated by applying the method to simulated observations generated from the same cooling models. This is a conventional test of statistical power under the assumption that the model is correct, not a reduction of the result to its inputs by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation. Systematic effects (cooling-rate uncertainties, binaries, multiple populations) are evaluated separately as an external error budget. The method rests on standard cooling physics and photometry likelihoods that are independent of the target age result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the accuracy of brown dwarf cooling models and the ability to separate cluster members from field objects and binaries in JWST photometry.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Brown dwarf cooling rates are sufficiently well modeled to support age inference at the 0.2 Gyr level
    The method relies on these rates; the abstract evaluates but does not eliminate uncertainties in them.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1227 out tokens · 31345 ms · 2026-05-15T15:28:43.459711+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

194 extracted references · 194 canonical work pages · 81 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Thecolor-magnitudediagramfortheglobularclusterM3.,

    A.R.Sandage,“Thecolor-magnitudediagramfortheglobularclusterM3.,”AJ,vol.58,pp.61–75,Jan.1953.doi:10.1086/106822

    work page doi:10.1086/106822 1953

  2. [2]

    A preliminary determination of the age of type II stars,

    C. B. Haselgrove and F. Hoyle, “A preliminary determination of the age of type II stars,” MNRAS, vol. 116, p. 527, Jan. 1956.doi: 10.1093/mnras/116.5.527

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/116.5.527 1956

  3. [3]

    StudyofDegeneracyinVeryLightStars.,

    S.S.Kumar,“StudyofDegeneracyinVeryLightStars.,”AJ,vol.67,p.579,Jan.1962.doi:10.1086/108658

    work page doi:10.1086/108658 1962

  4. [4]

    EvolutionofStarsofSmallMassesinthePre-Main-SequenceStages,

    C.HayashiandT.Nakano,“EvolutionofStarsofSmallMassesinthePre-Main-SequenceStages,”ProgressofTheoreticalPhysics,vol.30, no.4,pp.460–474,Oct.1963.doi:10.1143/PTP.30.460

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.30.460 1963

  5. [5]

    TheStructureofStarsofVeryLowMass.,

    S.S.Kumar,“TheStructureofStarsofVeryLowMass.,”ApJ,vol.137,p.1121,May1963.doi:10.1086/147589

    work page doi:10.1086/147589

  6. [6]

    Asimplexmethodforfunctionminimization,

    J.A.NelderandR.Mead,“Asimplexmethodforfunctionminimization,”TheComputerJournal,vol.7,no.4,pp.308–313,Jan.1965,issn: 0010-4620.doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308eprint:https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article-pdf/7/4/308/1013182/7-4-308.pdf.[Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308

    work page doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308eprint:https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article-pdf/7/4/308/1013182/7-4-308.pdf 1965

  7. [7]

    1970, ApJ, 162, 841, doi: 10.1086/150715

    A.Sandage,“Main-sequencephotometry,color-magnitudediagrams,andagesfortheglobularclustersM3,M13,M15andM92.,”ApJ, vol.162,p.841,Dec.1970.doi:10.1086/150715

    work page doi:10.1086/150715 1970

  8. [8]

    Postmainsequenceevolutionofsinglestars.,

    I.IbenJr.,“Postmainsequenceevolutionofsinglestars.,”ARA&A,vol.12,pp.215–256,Jan.1974.doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.12.090174.001243

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.12.090174.001243 1974

  9. [9]

    Multiplicityamongsolar-typestars.,

    H.A.AbtandS.G.Levy,“Multiplicityamongsolar-typestars.,”ApJS,vol.30,pp.273–306,Mar.1976.doi:10.1086/190363

    work page doi:10.1086/190363 1976

  10. [10]

    StellarPopulationsintheDiskandHalooftheGalaxy(presentedbyR.D.McClure),

    P.DemarqueandR.D.McClure,“StellarPopulationsintheDiskandHalooftheGalaxy(presentedbyR.D.McClure),”inEvolutionof GalaxiesandStellarPopulations,B.M.TinsleyandR.B.G.LarsonD.Campbell,Eds.,Jan.1977,p.199

    work page 1977

  11. [11]

    Compositionofhaloclustersandtheformationofthegalactichalo.,

    L.SearleandR.Zinn,“Compositionofhaloclustersandtheformationofthegalactichalo.,”ApJ,vol.225,pp.357–379,Oct.1978.doi: 10.1086/156499

    work page doi:10.1086/156499 1978

  12. [12]

    Globularclustersingalaxies.,

    W.E.HarrisandR.Racine,“Globularclustersingalaxies.,”ARA&A,vol.17,pp.241–274,Jan.1979.doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.17.090179. 001325

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.17.090179 1979

  13. [13]

    The significance of binaries with nearly identical components.,

    L. B. Lucy and E. Ricco, “The significance of binaries with nearly identical components.,” AJ, vol. 84, pp. 401–412, Mar. 1979.doi: 10.1086/112434

    work page doi:10.1086/112434 1979

  14. [14]

    GlobularClusterAgesandDistances,

    B.W.Carney,“GlobularClusterAgesandDistances,”inStarClusters,J.E.Hesser,Ed.,ser.IAUSymposium,vol.85,Jan.1980,p.329

    work page 1980

  15. [15]

    Theagesanddistancesofeightglobularclusters.,

    B.W.Carney,“Theagesanddistancesofeightglobularclusters.,”ApJS,vol.42,pp.481–500,Mar.1980.doi:10.1086/190659

    work page doi:10.1086/190659 1980

  16. [16]

    Ages and abundances of globular clusters and the oldest open clusters.,

    P. Demarque, “Ages and abundances of globular clusters and the oldest open clusters.,” inStar Clusters, J. E. Hesser, Ed., ser. IAU Symposium,vol.85,Jan.1980,pp.281–303

    work page 1980

  17. [17]

    Evidencefromsodium-abundancevariationsamongredgiantsofM13forinhomogeneitiesintheprotoclustergas.,

    R.C.Peterson,“Evidencefromsodium-abundancevariationsamongredgiantsofM13forinhomogeneitiesintheprotoclustergas.,”ApJ, vol.237,pp.L87–L91,May1980.doi:10.1086/157950

    work page doi:10.1086/157950

  18. [18]

    TheOosterhoffperiodgroupsandtheageofglobularclusters.I.Photometryofclustervariables inM15.,

    A.Sandage,B.Katem,andM.Sandage,“TheOosterhoffperiodgroupsandtheageofglobularclusters.I.Photometryofclustervariables inM15.,”ApJS,vol.46,pp.41–74,May1981.doi:10.1086/190734

    work page doi:10.1086/190734

  19. [19]

    SinglestarevolutionI.Massivestarsandearlyevolutionoflowandintermediatemassstars,

    I.IbenandA.Renzini,“SinglestarevolutionI.Massivestarsandearlyevolutionoflowandintermediatemassstars,”Phys.Rep.,vol.105, no.6,pp.329–406,Mar.1984.doi:10.1016/0370-1573(84)90142-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(84)90142-x 1984

  20. [20]

    Agesofglobularclustersfromtheirluminosityfunctions,

    B.Paczynski,“Agesofglobularclustersfromtheirluminosityfunctions,”ApJ,vol.284,pp.670–674,Sep.1984.doi:10.1086/162449

    work page doi:10.1086/162449 1984

  21. [21]

    Color-magnitudediagramsforthreedistantglobularclusters.,

    J.G.Cohen,“Color-magnitudediagramsforthreedistantglobularclusters.,”AJ,vol.90,pp.2254–2274,Nov.1985.doi:10.1086/113929

    work page doi:10.1086/113929 1985

  22. [22]

    Atheoryfortheoriginofglobularclusters.,

    S.M.FallandM.J.Rees,“Atheoryfortheoriginofglobularclusters.,”ApJ,vol.298,pp.18–26,Nov.1985.doi:10.1086/163585

    work page doi:10.1086/163585 1985

  23. [23]

    MultiplePopulationsontheHorizontalBranch,

    R.T.RoodandD.A.Crocker,“MultiplePopulationsontheHorizontalBranch,”inHorizontal-BranchandUV-BrightStars,A.G.D.Philip, Ed.,Jan.1985,pp.99–105

    work page 1985

  24. [24]

    StarFormationinGiantMolecularClouds,

    R.N.Henriksen,“StarFormationinGiantMolecularClouds,”ApJ,vol.310,p.189,Nov.1986.doi:10.1086/164675

    work page doi:10.1086/164675 1986

  25. [25]

    TheoreticalStellarLuminosityFunctionsandtheAgesandCompositionsofGlobularClusters,

    S.J.Ratcliff,“TheoreticalStellarLuminosityFunctionsandtheAgesandCompositionsofGlobularClusters,”ApJ,vol.318,p.196,Jul. 1987.doi:10.1086/165361

    work page doi:10.1086/165361 1987

  26. [26]

    Multiple Populations on the Horizontal Branch. I. Observations in the (log g, log T eff)–Diagram,

    D. A. Crocker, R. T. Rood, and R. W. O’Connell, “Multiple Populations on the Horizontal Branch. I. Observations in the (log g, log T eff)–Diagram,”ApJ,vol.332,p.236,Sep.1988.doi:10.1086/166648

    work page doi:10.1086/166648 1988

  27. [27]

    Deepphotometryofglobularclusters.XI.Palomar12:theyoungestgalacticglobularcluster?

    R.G.GrattonandS.Ortolani,“Deepphotometryofglobularclusters.XI.Palomar12:theyoungestgalacticglobularcluster?”A&AS, vol.73,pp.137–172,Apr.1988

    work page 1988

  28. [28]

    Testsofevolutionarysequencesusingcolor-magnitudediagramsofglobularclusters.,

    A.RenziniandF.FusiPecci,“Testsofevolutionarysequencesusingcolor-magnitudediagramsofglobularclusters.,”ARA&A,vol.26, pp.199–244,Jan.1988.doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.26.090188.001215 16–23 Roman Gerasimov New Way to Date Globular Clusters: Brown Dwarf Cooling Sequences

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.26.090188.001215 1988

  29. [29]

    TheoreticalModelsofVeryLowMassStarsandBrownDwarfs,

    A.Burrows,W.B.Hubbard,andJ.I.Lunine,“TheoreticalModelsofVeryLowMassStarsandBrownDwarfs,”ApJ,vol.345,p.939,Oct. 1989.doi:10.1086/167964

    work page doi:10.1086/167964 1989

  30. [30]

    ANewAgeDiagnosticAppliedtotheGlobularClustersNGC288andNGC362,

    A.SarajediniandP.Demarque,“ANewAgeDiagnosticAppliedtotheGlobularClustersNGC288andNGC362,”ApJ,vol.365,p.219, Dec.1990.doi:10.1086/169472

    work page doi:10.1086/169472 1990

  31. [31]

    MeasuringAgeDifferencesamongGlobularClustersHavingSimilarMetallicities:ANew MethodandFirstResults,

    D.A.Vandenberg,M.Bolte,andP.B.Stetson,“MeasuringAgeDifferencesamongGlobularClustersHavingSimilarMetallicities:ANew MethodandFirstResults,”AJ,vol.100,p.445,Aug.1990.doi:10.1086/115529

    work page doi:10.1086/115529 1990

  32. [32]

    TheFormationofGlobularClustersinMergingandInteractingGalaxies,

    K.M.AshmanandS.E.Zepf,“TheFormationofGlobularClustersinMergingandInteractingGalaxies,”ApJ,vol.384,p.50,Jan.1992. doi:10.1086/170850

    work page doi:10.1086/170850 1992

  33. [33]

    Oxygen-enhancedModelsforGlobularClusterStars.II.IsochronesandLuminosityFunctions,

    P.A.BergbuschandD.A.Vandenberg,“Oxygen-enhancedModelsforGlobularClusterStars.II.IsochronesandLuminosityFunctions,” ApJS,vol.81,p.163,Jul.1992.doi:10.1086/191690

    work page doi:10.1086/191690 1992

  34. [34]

    Thescienceofbrowndwarfs,

    A.BurrowsandJ.Liebert,“Thescienceofbrowndwarfs,”ReviewsofModernPhysics,vol.65,no.2,pp.301–336,Apr.1993.doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.65.301

    work page 1993

  35. [35]

    CoolZero-MetallicityStellarAtmospheres,

    D.Saumon,P.Bergeron,J.I.Lunine,W.B.Hubbard,andA.Burrows,“CoolZero-MetallicityStellarAtmospheres,”ApJ,vol.424,p.333, Mar.1994.doi:10.1086/173892

    work page doi:10.1086/173892 1994

  36. [36]

    HSTObservationsoftheStellarPopulationoftheGlobularClusterW CEN,

    R.A.W.Elson,G.F.Gilmore,B.X.Santiago,andS.Casertano,“HSTObservationsoftheStellarPopulationoftheGlobularClusterW CEN,”AJ,vol.110,p.682,Aug.1995.doi:10.1086/117553

    work page doi:10.1086/117553 1995

  37. [37]

    Hubble Space Telescope Observations of White Dwarfs in the Globular Cluster M4

    H.B.Richeretal.,“HubbleSpaceTelescopeObservationsofWhiteDwarfsintheGlobularClusterM4,”ApJ,vol.451,p.L17,Sep.1995. doi:10.1086/309674arXiv:astro-ph/9507109[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/309674arxiv:astro-ph/9507109 1995

  38. [38]

    Themultivariateskew-normaldistribution,

    A.AzzaliniandA.D.Valle,“Themultivariateskew-normaldistribution,”Biometrika,vol.83,no.4,pp.715–726,Dec.1996,issn:0006-3444. doi:10.1093/biomet/83.4.715eprint:https://academic.oup.com/biomet/article-pdf/83/4/715/702865/83-4-715.pdf.[Online].Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/83.4.715

    work page doi:10.1093/biomet/83.4.715eprint:https://academic.oup.com/biomet/article-pdf/83/4/715/702865/83-4-715.pdf 1996

  39. [39]

    ACatalogofParametersforGlobularClustersintheMilkyWay,

    W.E.Harris,“ACatalogofParametersforGlobularClustersintheMilkyWay,”AJ,vol.112,p.1487,Oct.1996.doi:10.1086/118116

    work page doi:10.1086/118116 1996

  40. [40]

    A New Self-consistency Check on the Ages of Globular Clusters,

    R. Jimenez and P. Padoan, “A New Self-consistency Check on the Ages of Globular Clusters,” ApJ, vol. 463, p. L17, May 1996.doi: 10.1086/310053

    work page doi:10.1086/310053 1996

  41. [41]

    The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Variable Stars in Globular Clusters -I. Fields 5139A-C in Omega Centauri

    J.Kaluzny,M.Kubiak,M.Szymanski,A.Udalski,W.Krzeminski,andM.Mateo,“Theopticalgravitationallensingexperiment.Variable starsinglobularclusters.I.Fields5139A-Cin 𝜔Centauri.,”A&AS,vol.120,pp.139–152,Nov.1996.doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9601053 arXiv:astro-ph/9601053[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9601053 1996

  42. [42]

    TheAgeoftheGalacticGlobularClusterSystem,

    D.A.Vandenberg,M.Bolte,andP.B.Stetson,“TheAgeoftheGalacticGlobularClusterSystem,”ARA&A,vol.34,pp.461–510,Jan.1996. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.461

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.461 1996

  43. [43]

    Determination of the globular cluster and halo stellar mass functions and stellar and brown dwarf densities

    G.ChabrierandD.Mera,“Determinationoftheglobularclusterandhalostellarmassfunctionsandstellarandbrowndwarfdensities,” A&A,vol.328,pp.83–94,Dec.1997.doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9705065arXiv:astro-ph/9705065[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9705065arxiv:astro-ph/9705065 1997

  44. [44]

    Detached eclipsing binaries as primary distance and age indicators

    B.PaczynskiandD.Sasselov,“DetachedEclipsingBinariesasPrimaryDistanceandAgeIndicators.,”inVariablesStarsandtheAstrophysical ReturnsoftheMicrolensingSurveys,R.Ferlet,J. -P.Maillard,andB.Raban,Eds.,Jan.1997,p.309.doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9608094 arXiv:astro-ph/9608094[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9608094 1997

  45. [45]

    Ages of globular clusters: breaking the age-distance degeneracy with the luminosity function

    P.PadoanandR.Jimenez,“AgesofGlobularClusters:BreakingtheAge-DistanceDegeneracywiththeLuminosityFunction,”ApJ,vol.475, no.2,pp.580–583,Feb.1997.doi:10.1086/303582arXiv:astro-ph/9603060[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/303582arxiv:astro-ph/9603060 1997

  46. [46]

    Reconstructing Waddington’s landscape from data

    R.Jimenez,“GlobularClusterAges,”ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofScience,vol.95,no.1,pp.13–17,Jan.1998.doi:10.1073/pnas. 95.1.13

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas 1998

  47. [47]

    The ages and distances of globular clusters with the luminosity function method: the case of M5 and M55

    R.JimenezandP.Padoan,“TheAgesandDistancesofGlobularClusterswiththeLuminosityFunctionMethod:TheCaseofM5and M55,”ApJ,vol.498,no.2,pp.704–709,May1998.doi:10.1086/305593arXiv:astro-ph/9701141[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/305593arxiv:astro-ph/9701141

  48. [48]

    LuminosityFunctionsforGlobularClusters,

    F.Silvestri,P.Ventura,F.D’Antona,andI.Mazzitelli,“LuminosityFunctionsforGlobularClusters,”ApJ,vol.509,no.1,pp.192–202,Dec. 1998.doi:10.1086/306483

    work page doi:10.1086/306483 1998

  49. [49]

    Keck Spectra of Pleiades Brown Dwarf Candidates and a Precise Determination of the Lithium Depletion Edge in the Pleiades

    J.R.Stauffer,G.Schultz,andJ.D.Kirkpatrick,“KeckSpectraofPleiadesBrownDwarfCandidatesandaPreciseDeterminationofthe LithiumDepletionEdgeinthePleiades,”ApJ,vol.499,no.2,pp.L199–L203,Jun.1998.doi:10.1086/311379arXiv:astro-ph/9804005 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/311379arxiv:astro-ph/9804005 1998

  50. [50]

    The Lithium Depletion Boundary and the Age of the Young Open Cluster IC~2391

    D.BarradoyNavascués,J.R.Stauffer,andB.M.Patten,“TheLithium-DepletionBoundaryandtheAgeoftheYoungOpenClusterIC 2391,”ApJ,vol.522,no.1,pp.L53–L56,Sep.1999.doi:10.1086/312212arXiv:astro-ph/9907007[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/312212arxiv:astro-ph/9907007 1999

  51. [51]

    The Mass Function of Main Sequence Stars in NGC6397 from Near IR and Optical High Resolution HST Observations

    G.DeMarchi,F.Paresce,andL.Pulone,“TheMassFunctionofMain-SequenceStarsinNGC6397fromNear-InfraredandOpticalHigh- ResolutionHubbleSpaceTelescopeObservations,”ApJ,vol.530,no.1,pp.342–351,Feb.2000.doi:10.1086/308334arXiv:astro-ph/9908251 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/308334arxiv:astro-ph/9908251 2000

  52. [52]

    J., Lucey , J

    J.R.Hurley,O.R.Pols,andC.A.Tout,“Comprehensiveanalyticformulaeforstellarevolutionasafunctionofmassandmetallicity,” MNRAS,vol.315,no.3,pp.543–569,Jul.2000.doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.xarXiv:astro-ph/0001295[astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.xarxiv:astro-ph/0001295 2000

  53. [53]

    Neutron-Capture Element Abundances in the Globular ClusterM15,

    C. Sneden, J. Johnson, R. P. Kraft, G. H. Smith, J. J. Cowan, and M. S. Bolte, “Neutron-Capture Element Abundances in the Globular ClusterM15,”ApJ,vol.536,no.2,pp.L85–L88,Jun.2000.doi:10.1086/312742 17–23 New Way to Date Globular Clusters: Brown Dwarf Cooling Sequences Roman Gerasimov

    work page doi:10.1086/312742 2000

  54. [54]

    Comparison between Observed and Theoretical Red Giant Branch Luminosity Functions of Galactic Globular Clusters

    M. Zoccali and G. Piotto, “Comparison between observed and theoretical Red Giant Branch luminosity functions of galactic globular clusters,”A&A,vol.358,pp.943–955,Jun.2000.doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0005034arXiv:astro-ph/0005034[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0005034arxiv:astro-ph/0005034 2000

  55. [55]

    The Frequency of Binary Stars in the Core of 47 Tucanae

    M.D.Albrow,R.L.Gilliland,T.M.Brown,P.D.Edmonds,P.Guhathakurta,andA.Sarajedini,“TheFrequencyofBinaryStarsintheCore of47Tucanae,”ApJ,vol.559,no.2,pp.1060–1081,Oct.2001.doi:10.1086/322353arXiv:astro-ph/0105441[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/322353arxiv:astro-ph/0105441 2001

  56. [56]

    The Theory of Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Giant Planets

    A.Burrows,W.B.Hubbard,J.I.Lunine,andJ.Liebert,“Thetheoryofbrowndwarfsandextrasolargiantplanets,”ReviewsofModern Physics,vol.73,no.3,pp.719–765,Jul.2001.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.73.719arXiv:astro-ph/0103383[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.719arxiv:astro-ph/0103383 2001

  57. [57]

    Halo White Dwarfs, Thick Disks and a Sanity Check

    B.M.S.Hansen,“HaloWhiteDwarfs,ThickDisks,andaSanityCheck,”ApJ,vol.558,no.1,pp.L39–L42,Sep.2001.doi:10.1086/323495 arXiv:astro-ph/0105018[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/323495 2001

  58. [58]

    On the variation of the initial mass function,

    P. Kroupa, “On the variation of the initial mass function,” MNRAS, vol. 322, no. 2, pp. 231–246, Apr. 2001.doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 8711.2001.04022.xarXiv:astro-ph/0009005[astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365- 2001

  59. [59]

    Cluster AgeS Experiment: The Age and Distance of the Globular Cluster omega Centauri Determined from Observations of the Eclipsing Binary OGLEGC17

    I.B.Thompsonetal.,“ClusterAgeSExperiment:TheAgeandDistanceoftheGlobularCluster 𝜔CentauriDeterminedfromObservations of the Eclipsing Binary OGLEGC 17,” AJ, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 3089–3099, Jun. 2001.doi: 10.1086/321084 arXiv: astro-ph/0012493 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/321084 2001

  60. [60]

    Nucleosynthesis Clocks and the Age of the Galaxy

    J.W.Truran,S.Burles,J.J.Cowan,andC.Sneden,“NucleosynthesisClocksandtheAgeoftheGalaxy,”inAstrophysicalAgesandTimes Scales, T. von Hippel, C. Simpson, and N. Manset, Eds., ser. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol. 245, Jan. 2001, p.226.doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0109526arXiv:astro-ph/0109526[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0109526arxiv:astro-ph/0109526 2001

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    M.A.Beasley,C.M.Baugh,D.A.Forbes,R.M.Sharples,andC.S.Frenk,“Ontheformationofglobularclustersystemsinahierarchical Universe,”MNRAS,vol.333,no.2,pp.383–399,Jun.2002.doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05402.xarXiv:astro-ph/0202191[astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05402.xarxiv:astro-ph/0202191 2002

  62. [62]

    The White Dwarf Cooling Sequence of the Globular Cluster Messier 4

    B.M.S.Hansenetal.,“TheWhiteDwarfCoolingSequenceoftheGlobularClusterMessier4,”ApJ,vol.574,no.2,pp.L155–L158,Aug. 2002.doi:10.1086/342528arXiv:astro-ph/0205087[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/342528arxiv:astro-ph/0205087 2002

  63. [63]

    Red Giant Branch stars: the theoretical framework

    M.Salaris,S.Cassisi,andA.Weiss,“RedGiantBranchStars:TheTheoreticalFramework,”PASP,vol.114,no.794,pp.375–402,Apr.2002. doi:10.1086/342498arXiv:astro-ph/0201387[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/342498arxiv:astro-ph/0201387 2002

  64. [64]

    Building up the globular cluster system of the Milky Way. The contribution of the Sagittarius galaxy

    M.Bellazzini,F.R.Ferraro,andR.Ibata,“BuildingUptheGlobularClusterSystemoftheMilkyWay:TheContributionoftheSagittarius Galaxy,”AJ,vol.125,no.1,pp.188–196,Jan.2003.doi:10.1086/344072arXiv:astro-ph/0210596[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/344072arxiv:astro-ph/0210596 2003

  65. [65]

    Omega Centauri: The Population Puzzle Goes Deeper

    L.R.Bedinetal.,“ 𝜔Centauri:ThePopulationPuzzleGoesDeeper,”ApJ,vol.605,no.2,pp.L125–L128,Apr.2004.doi:10.1086/420847 arXiv:astro-ph/0403112[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/420847 2004

  66. [66]

    T Dwarfs and the Substellar Mass Function. I. Monte Carlo Simulations

    A.J.Burgasser,“TDwarfsandtheSubstellarMassFunction.I.MonteCarloSimulations,”ApJS,vol.155,no.1,pp.191–207,Nov.2004. doi:10.1086/424386arXiv:astro-ph/0407624[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/424386arxiv:astro-ph/0407624 2004

  67. [67]

    Theoretical Examination of the Lithium Depletion Boundary

    C.J.Burke,M.H.Pinsonneault,andA.Sills,“TheoreticalExaminationoftheLithiumDepletionBoundary,”ApJ,vol.604,no.1,pp.272– 283,Mar.2004.doi:10.1086/381242arXiv:astro-ph/0309461[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/381242arxiv:astro-ph/0309461 2004

  68. [68]

    HST Observations of the White Dwarf Cooling Sequence of M4

    B.M.S.Hansenetal.,“HubbleSpaceTelescopeObservationsoftheWhiteDwarfCoolingSequenceofM4,”ApJS,vol.155,no.2,pp.551–576, Dec.2004.doi:10.1086/424832arXiv:astro-ph/0401443[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/424832arxiv:astro-ph/0401443 2004

  69. [69]

    J., Zwaan , M

    A.D.MackeyandG.F.Gilmore,“Comparingthepropertiesoflocalglobularclustersystems:implicationsfortheformationoftheGalactic halo,”MNRAS,vol.355,no.2,pp.504–534,Dec.2004.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08343.xarXiv:astro-ph/0408404[astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08343.xarxiv:astro-ph/0408404 2004

  70. [70]

    Beryllium in turnoff stars of NGC 6397: Early Galaxy spallation, cosmochronology and cluster formation.,

    L. Pasquini, P. Bonifacio, S. Randich, D. Galli, and R. G. Gratton, “Beryllium in turnoff stars of NGC 6397: Early Galaxy spallation, cosmochronology and cluster formation.,” A&A, vol. 426, pp. 651–657, Nov. 2004.doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041254 arXiv: astro- ph/0407524[astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041254 2004

  71. [71]

    Whiting 1: a new Halo Young Globular Cluster

    G.Carraro,“Whiting1:ANewHaloYoungGlobularCluster,”ApJ,vol.621,no.1,pp.L61–L64,Mar.2005.doi:10.1086/428945arXiv: astro-ph/0501465[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/428945arxiv: 2005

  72. [72]

    K., & Leung, P

    N.Ivanova,K.Belczynski,J.M.Fregeau,andF.A.Rasio,“Theevolutionofbinaryfractionsinglobularclusters,”MNRAS,vol.358,no.2, pp.572–584,Apr.2005.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08804.xarXiv:astro-ph/0501131[astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08804.xarxiv:astro-ph/0501131 2005

  73. [73]

    ExtragalacticGlobularClustersandGalaxyFormation,

    J.P.BrodieandJ.Strader,“ExtragalacticGlobularClustersandGalaxyFormation,”ARA&A,vol.44,no.1,pp.193–267,Sep.2006.doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092441arXiv:astro-ph/0602601[astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092441arxiv:astro-ph/0602601 2006

  74. [74]

    L and T Dwarf Models and the L to T Transition

    A.Burrows,D.Sudarsky,andI.Hubeny,“LandTDwarfModelsandtheLtoTTransition,”ApJ,vol.640,no.2,pp.1063–1077,Apr.2006. doi:10.1086/500293arXiv:astro-ph/0509066[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/500293arxiv:astro-ph/0509066 2006

  75. [75]

    Not Alone: Tracing the Origins of Very Low Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs Through Multiplicity Studies

    A. J. Burgasser et al., “Not Alone: Tracing the Origins of Very-Low-Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs Through Multiplicity Studies,” in ProtostarsandPlanetsV,B.Reipurth,D.Jewitt,andK.Keil,Eds.,Jan.2007,p.427.arXiv:astro-ph/0602122[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  76. [76]

    An Analysis of the Shapes of Interstellar Extinction Curves. V. The IR-Through-UV Curve Morphology

    E.L.FitzpatrickandD.Massa,“AnAnalysisoftheShapesofInterstellarExtinctionCurves.V.TheIR-through-UVCurveMorphology,” ApJ,vol.663,no.1,pp.320–341,Jul.2007.doi:10.1086/518158arXiv:0705.0154[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/518158arxiv:0705.0154 2007

  77. [77]

    The White Dwarf Cooling Sequence of NGC6397

    B.M.S.Hansenetal.,“TheWhiteDwarfCoolingSequenceofNGC6397,”ApJ,vol.671,no.1,pp.380–401,Dec.2007.doi:10.1086/522567 arXiv:astro-ph/0701738[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/522567 2007

  78. [78]

    Beryllium abundance in turn-off stars of NGC 6752

    L.Pasquini,P.Bonifacio,S.Randich,D.Galli,R.G.Gratton,andB.Wolff,“Berylliumabundanceinturn-offstarsofNGC6752,”A&A, vol.464,no.2,pp.601–607,Mar.2007.doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066260arXiv:astro-ph/0612710[astro-ph]. 18–23 Roman Gerasimov New Way to Date Globular Clusters: Brown Dwarf Cooling Sequences

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066260arxiv:astro-ph/0612710 2007

  79. [79]

    White Dwarf cooling Sequences, II: luminosity functions

    P.G.PradaMoroniandO.Straniero,“Whitedwarfcoolingsequences.II.Luminosityfunctions,”A&A,vol.466,no.3,pp.1043–1051,May 2007.doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20067023arXiv:astro-ph/0702405[astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20067023arxiv:astro-ph/0702405 2007

  80. [80]

    I., & Basu, S

    A.Sollima,G.Beccari,F.R.Ferraro,F.FusiPecci,andA.Sarajedini,“Thefractionofbinarysystemsinthecoreof13low-densityGalactic globularclusters,”MNRAS,vol.380,no.2,pp.781–791,Sep.2007.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12116.xarXiv:0706.2288[astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12116.xarxiv:0706.2288 2007

Showing first 80 references.