pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.09327 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-10 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Production of muonic kaon atoms at high-energy colliders

Xiaofeng Wang , Zebo Tang , Zhangbu Xu , Chi Yang , Wangmei Zha , Yifei Zhang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 14:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords muonic kaon atomsD0 semileptonic decaysquark-gluon plasma coalescencebranching ratiocollider yieldsexotic atomsprimordial muonselectromagnetic radiation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Muonic kaon atoms form in D0 decays and quark-gluon plasma coalescence with yields high enough for first observation at LHC and RHIC.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a framework for producing exotic muonic kaon atoms in semileptonic D0 decays by combining the effective weak Hamiltonian, a helicity treatment of the leptonic current, and a nonrelativistic bound-state projection. This yields a branching ratio of 2.29 times 10 to the minus 10, which is then used in simulations to project production rates at RHIC, LHC, and STCF. The atoms can also form through coalescence inside the quark-gluon plasma created in heavy-ion collisions. These atoms would serve as a probe of low-momentum primordial muons and early electromagnetic radiation in a phase space not easily accessed by standard dilepton or photon measurements. Projected numbers indicate that detection via secondary-vertex reconstruction is feasible with existing and planned collider luminosities.

Core claim

The central claim is that the branching ratio BR(D0 to (K mu) nu_mu) equals 2.29 times 10 to the minus 10 and that, when combined with coalescence production inside the quark-gluon plasma, the resulting yields at RHIC, LHC, and STCF are large enough for the first experimental observation of muonic kaon atoms, which would then provide a clean handle on low-momentum muons and early-time electromagnetic radiation.

What carries the argument

Nonrelativistic bound-state projection of the K mu atom inserted into the semileptonic decay amplitude, supplemented by the coalescence mechanism for production inside the quark-gluon plasma.

If this is right

  • Projected yields from D0 decays in LHC high-luminosity proton-proton collisions reach the level needed for first observation.
  • Additional production via QGP coalescence in heavy-ion runs at both LHC and RHIC supplies an independent channel.
  • Dissociation cross sections in detector material remain low enough that secondary-vertex reconstruction can separate signal from background.
  • The atoms give access to an otherwise unexplored kinematic region for thermal dilepton and photon emission studies.
  • Observation would directly constrain the spectrum of low-momentum primordial muons produced in the collision.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the atoms are seen, their momentum distributions could be used to test the timing and strength of electromagnetic radiation in the first few fm/c of the collision.
  • The same framework could be applied to other light exotic atoms to map out coalescence efficiencies across different reduced masses.
  • A measured branching ratio differing from 2.29 times 10 to the minus 10 would require revisiting either the bound-state projection or higher-order weak-interaction contributions.
  • Success at the LHC would justify dedicated runs or detector upgrades at STCF to accumulate larger samples for precision studies.

Load-bearing premise

The nonrelativistic bound-state wave function and the coalescence picture both capture the actual formation rates without large relativistic or medium-induced corrections.

What would settle it

No reconstructed K mu atoms observed after accumulating the projected D0 decay statistics in LHC high-luminosity proton-proton runs, or measured yields falling more than a factor of a few below the calculated numbers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.09327 by Chi Yang, Wangmei Zha, Xiaofeng Wang, Yifei Zhang, Zebo Tang, Zhangbu Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Exponential-function fits to the STAR direct virtual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a framework for the formation of exotic muonic kaon atoms ($K\mu$) in semileptonic $D^{0}$ decays, using the effective weak Hamiltonian, a helicity-based treatment of the leptonic current, and a nonrelativistic bound-state projection. The resulting branching ratio, $\mathrm{BR}(D^{0} \to (K\mu )\nu_{\mu})=2.29\times10^{-10}$, is implemented in a ROOT-based code to estimate yields at RHIC, LHC, and STCF. We show quantitatively that $K\mu$ atoms-also produced through coalescence in the quark-gluon plasma (QGP)-provide a sensitive probe of low-momentum primordial muons and early time electromagnetic radiation, offering complementary constraints in an otherwise unexplored phase space for thermal dilepton and photon emission. Newly estimated dissociation cross sections in detector material indicate that secondary-vertex reconstruction should be experimentally feasible, allowing clean experimental identification of the atoms. Projected yields from QGP coalescence in LHC and RHIC heavy-ion collisions, and from $D^{0}$ decays in LHC high luminosity $p+p$ collisions indicate that the first observation of $K\mu$ atoms is within reach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a framework for producing muonic kaon atoms (Kμ) via semileptonic D⁰ decays, employing the effective weak Hamiltonian, a helicity leptonic current, and nonrelativistic bound-state projection to obtain BR(D⁰ → (Kμ)ν_μ) = 2.29×10^{-10}. This is implemented in ROOT code to estimate yields at RHIC, LHC, and STCF; coalescence in the QGP is also considered. The paper argues that dissociation cross sections allow secondary-vertex reconstruction and that projected yields make first observation feasible, positioning Kμ atoms as a probe of low-momentum muons and early electromagnetic radiation.

Significance. If the branching ratio and formation rates hold, the work identifies a novel, experimentally accessible channel for constraining low-momentum primordial muons and early-time EM radiation in heavy-ion collisions, complementary to thermal dilepton and photon measurements. The quantitative yield estimates and dissociation cross sections provide concrete guidance for detector studies at existing facilities.

major comments (1)
  1. [branching-ratio calculation and bound-state projection] In the derivation of BR(D⁰ → (Kμ)ν_μ) via the nonrelativistic bound-state projection onto the Kμ Coulomb ground state, the relative momentum is taken to be set by the atomic Bohr scale (~few MeV). However, the semileptonic decay kinematics populate relative K-μ momenta up to ~m_D/2 ~ 1 GeV. No relativistic two-body wave function, Bethe-Salpeter correction, or off-shell matching is supplied to bridge this scale mismatch; the same projection is reused for QGP coalescence. This directly affects the quoted BR and all downstream yield projections that support the 'within reach' claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results section] The abstract and main text quote a precise numerical branching ratio without error bars, uncertainty estimates, or sensitivity analysis to the projection assumptions.
  2. [yield estimation] Implementation details of the ROOT-based code used for yield estimation (event generation, acceptance, etc.) are not provided, limiting reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting the important issue of the bound-state projection approximation. We address this point directly below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the derivation of BR(D⁰ → (Kμ)ν_μ) via the nonrelativistic bound-state projection onto the Kμ Coulomb ground state, the relative momentum is taken to be set by the atomic Bohr scale (~few MeV). However, the semileptonic decay kinematics populate relative K-μ momenta up to ~m_D/2 ~ 1 GeV. No relativistic two-body wave function, Bethe-Salpeter correction, or off-shell matching is supplied to bridge this scale mismatch; the same projection is reused for QGP coalescence. This directly affects the quoted BR and all downstream yield projections that support the 'within reach' claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the kinematic mismatch between the atomic Bohr momentum scale (few MeV) and the semileptonic decay range (up to ~1 GeV). The nonrelativistic Coulomb projection is used as a leading-order estimate of the overlap integral with the ground-state wave function, whose momentum-space support is strongly peaked at low relative momentum; the high-momentum components of the decay amplitude are therefore suppressed by the wave-function fall-off. The same approximation is applied to QGP coalescence under the assumption that the relevant muons and kaons are soft. A complete relativistic treatment via the Bethe-Salpeter equation or off-shell matching would be more rigorous but requires substantial additional formalism beyond the scope of this exploratory work. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit paragraph discussing the limitations of the nonrelativistic projection, clarifying that the quoted branching ratio is an order-of-magnitude estimate, and noting that the yield projections should be interpreted with this caveat. The overall conclusion that first observation is within reach remains unchanged at the present level of precision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper computes BR(D⁰ → (Kμ)ν_μ) from the effective weak Hamiltonian plus helicity current and nonrelativistic bound-state projection, then feeds the numerical result into a ROOT yield estimator. No equation reduces the BR to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation is load-bearing for the central result, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is imported from prior author work. The nonrelativistic projection is an explicit modeling choice whose validity is a separate correctness question, not a circularity issue. Yields at colliders are downstream estimates, not redefinitions of the input BR.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard particle-physics tools plus the nonrelativistic approximation for the bound state; no free parameters or new entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Effective weak Hamiltonian for semileptonic D0 decays
    Standard tool invoked for the decay amplitude calculation.
  • domain assumption Nonrelativistic bound-state projection for the muonic kaon atom
    Used to project the leptonic current onto the bound state; validity assumed without relativistic corrections.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5523 in / 1502 out tokens · 101482 ms · 2026-05-15T14:07:37.957002+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Schuhmannet al.(CREMA), The helion charge radius from laser spectroscopy of muonic helium-3 ions, Science 388, adj2610 (2025)

    K. Schuhmannet al.(CREMA), The helion charge radius from laser spectroscopy of muonic helium-3 ions, Science 388, adj2610 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Tanaka, R

    Y. Tanaka, R. M. Steffen, E. B. Shera, W. Reuter, M. V. Hoehn, and J. D. Zumbro, Precision muonic-atom measurements of nuclear quadrupole moments and the sternheimer effect in rare-earth atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1633 (1983)

    work page 1983

  3. [3]

    J. R. Persson, Muonic hyperfine structure and the bohr–weisskopf effect, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2310.16398 (2025), arXiv:2310.16398v3, arXiv:2310.16398 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.16398 2025

  4. [4]

    Antognini, F

    A. Antognini, F. Kottmann, and R. Pohl, Laser spectroscopy of light muonic atoms and the nuclear charge radii, SciPost Phys. Proc.5, 021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Gorchtein, A hitchhiker’s guide to nuclear polarization in muonic atoms, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2501.15274 (2025), arXiv:2501.15274v1, arXiv:2501.15274 [nucl-th]

    M. Gorchtein, A hitchhiker’s guide to nuclear polarization in muonic atoms, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2501.15274 (2025), arXiv:2501.15274v1, arXiv:2501.15274 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.15274 2025

  6. [6]

    S. S. Li Muli, B. Acharya, O. J. Hernandez, and S. Bacca, Bayesian analysis of nuclear polarizability corrections to the lamb shift of muonic h-atoms and he-ions, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.49, 105101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Okumura, T

    T. Okumura, T. Azuma, D. A. Bennett, I. Chiu, et al., Proof-of-principle experiment for testing strong- field quantum electrodynamics with exotic atoms: High precision x-ray spectroscopy of muonic neon, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 173001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Ching, T.-H

    H.-R. Ching, T.-H. Ho, and C.-H. Chang, On (πµ) atoms produced in k0l decay, Physics Letters B98, 456 (1981)

    work page 1981

  9. [9]

    G. Baym, G. Friedman, R. J. Hughes, and B. V. Jacak, Production of muon - meson atoms in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. D48, R3957 (1993)

    work page 1993

  10. [10]

    A. V. Eskin, A. P. Martynenko, and E. N. Elekina, The correction of hadronic nucleus polarizability to hyperfine structure of light muonic atoms, EPJ Web Conf.158, 07002 (2017), arXiv:1711.00534 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    Coombeset al., Detection of pi mu Coulomb Bound States, Phys

    R. Coombeset al., Detection of pi mu Coulomb Bound States, Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 249 (1976)

    work page 1976

  12. [12]

    S. H. Aronson, R. H. Bernstein, G. J. Bock, R. D. Cousins, J. F. Greenhalgh, D. Hedin, M. Schwartz, T. K. Shea, G. B. Thomson, and B. Winstein, MEASUREMENT OF THE RATE OF FORMATION OF PI MU ATOMS IN K0(L) DECAY, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1078 (1982)

    work page 1982

  13. [13]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    X. Wang, F. Geurts, Z. Tang, K. Xin, Z. Xu, Y. Zhang, and L. Zhou, Coalescence formation of muonic atoms at RHIC, Phys. Lett. B861, 139242 (2025), arXiv:2410.06518 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    J. I. Kapusta and A. Mocsy, Hydrogen - like atoms from ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C59, 2937 (1999), arXiv:nucl-th/9812013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    Direct virtual photon production in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Direct virtual photon production in Au+Au collisions at √ s N N= 200 GeV, Phys. Lett. B770, 451 (2017), arXiv:1607.01447 [nucl- ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    N. J. Abdulameeret al.(PHENIX), Nonprompt direct- photon production in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C109, 044912 (2024), arXiv:2203.17187 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Dielectron production in central Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Dielectron production in central Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Rev. C 112, 054906 (2025), arXiv:2308.16704 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    B. E. Aboonaet al.(STAR), Temperature measurement of Quark-Gluon plasma at different stages, Nature Commun.16, 9098 (2025), arXiv:2402.01998 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Improved measurements of D0→K-ℓ+νℓand D+→K¯0ℓ+νℓ, Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Improved measurements of D0→K-ℓ+νℓand D+→K¯0ℓ+νℓ, Phys. Rev. D110, 112006 (2024), arXiv:2408.09087 [hep-ex]. 9

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Chakraborty, W

    B. Chakraborty, W. G. Parrott, C. Bouchard, C. T. H. Davies, J. Koponen, and G. P. Lepage ((HPQCD Collaboration)§, HPQCD), Improved Vcs determination using precise lattice QCD form factors for D→Kℓν, Phys. Rev. D104, 034505 (2021), arXiv:2104.09883 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Mrowczynski, Interaction of Elementary Atoms With Matter, Phys

    S. Mrowczynski, Interaction of Elementary Atoms With Matter, Phys. Rev. A33, 1549 (1986)

    work page 1986

  23. [23]

    H. S. Matis, R. L. Brown, W. Christie, W. R. Edwards, R. Jared, B. Minor, and P. Salz, Integration and conventional systems at STAR, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499, 802 (2003), arXiv:nucl-ex/0205008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  24. [24]

    The STAR Time Projection Chamber: A Unique Tool for Studying High Multiplicity Events at RHIC

    M. Andersonet al., The Star time projection chamber: A Unique tool for studying high multiplicity events at RHIC, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A499, 659 (2003), arXiv:nucl-ex/0301015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  25. [25]

    Goy L´ opez (CMS), CMS detector performance, EPJ Web Conf.182, 02076 (2018)

    S. Goy L´ opez (CMS), CMS detector performance, EPJ Web Conf.182, 02076 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    CMS Collaboration,CMS Technical Design Report for the Pixel Detector Upgrade, Tech. Rep. CERN-LHCC- 2012-016, CMS-TDR-011 (CERN, 2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Aiet al., Conceptual design report of the Super Tau-Charm Facility: the accelerator, Nucl

    X.-C. Aiet al., Conceptual design report of the Super Tau-Charm Facility: the accelerator, Nucl. Sci. Tech.36, 242 (2025), arXiv:2509.11522 [physics.acc-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Achasov et al., STCF conceptual design report (V olume 1): Physics & detector, Front

    M. Achasovet al., STCF conceptual design report (Volume 1): Physics & detector, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 19, 14701 (2024), arXiv:2303.15790 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Adamset al.(STAR), STAR Note 0793 (2022), sTAR internal note

    J. Adamset al.(STAR), STAR Note 0793 (2022), sTAR internal note

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Measurements of $D^{0}$ and $D^{*}$ Production in $p$ + $p$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Measurements ofD 0 andD ∗ Production inp+pCollisions at √s= 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. D86, 072013 (2012), arXiv:1204.4244 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  31. [31]

    Improved Monte Carlo Glauber predictions at present and future nuclear colliders

    C. Loizides, J. Kamin, and D. d’Enterria, Improved Monte Carlo Glauber predictions at present and future nuclear colliders, Phys. Rev. C97, 054910 (2018), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 99, 019901 (2019)], arXiv:1710.07098 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Charm-quark fragmentation fractions and production cross section at midrapidity in pp collisions at the LHC, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Charm-quark fragmentation fractions and production cross section at midrapidity in pp collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D105, L011103 (2022), arXiv:2105.06335 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    CMS Collaboration (CMS), Public CMS Luminosity Information (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Charged-particle nuclear modification factors in PbPb and pPb collisions at sqrt(s[NN]) = 5.02 TeV

    V. Khachatryanet al.(CMS), Charged-particle nuclear modification factors in PbPb and pPb collisions at √ s N N = 5.02 TeV, JHEP04, 039, arXiv:1611.01664 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Light nuclei production as a probe of the QCD phase diagram

    K.-J. Sun, L.-W. Chen, C. M. Ko, J. Pu, and Z. Xu, Light nuclei production as a probe of the QCD phase diagram, Phys. Lett. B781, 499 (2018), arXiv:1801.09382 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Hillmann, K

    P. Hillmann, K. K¨ afer, J. Steinheimer, V. Vovchenko, and M. Bleicher, Coalescence, the thermal model and multi-fragmentation: the energy and volume dependence of light nuclei production in heavy ion collisions, J. Phys. G49, 055107 (2022), arXiv:2109.05972 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    S. T. Butler and C. A. Pearson, Deuterons from High- Energy Proton Bombardment of Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 69 (1961)

    work page 1961

  38. [38]

    J. L. Nagle, B. S. Kumar, D. Kusnezov, H. Sorge, and R. Mattiello, Coalescence of deuterons in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C53, 367 (1996)

    work page 1996

  39. [39]

    W. J. Llopeet al., The fragment coalescence model, Phys. Rev. C52, 2004 (1995)

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    Search for Muonic Atoms at RHIC

    K. Xin (STAR), Search for Muonic Atoms at RHIC, in 20th International Conference on Particles and Nuclei (2014) pp. 216–219, arXiv:1410.8037 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    Pion-Kaon correlations in central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 130$ GeV

    J. Adamset al.(STAR), Pion kaon correlations in Au+Au collisions at s(NN)**1/2 = 130-GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262302 (2003), arXiv:nucl-ex/0307025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  42. [42]

    J. Adamset al.(STAR), Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR Collaboration’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions, Nucl. Phys. A757, 102 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0501009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  43. [43]

    Detailed measurement of the e+e- pair continuum in p+p and Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV and implications for direct photon production

    A. Adareet al.(PHENIX), Detailed measurement of the e+e− pair continuum inp+pand Au+Au collisions at √ s N N= 200 GeV and implications for direct photon production, Phys. Rev. C81, 034911 (2010), arXiv:0912.0244 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  44. [44]

    J. Chen, J. Deng, Z. Tang, Z. Xu, and L. Yi, Nonequilibrium kinetic freeze-out properties in relativistic heavy ion collisions from energies employed at the RHIC beam energy scan to those available at the LHC, Phys. Rev. C104, 034901 (2021), arXiv:2012.02986 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021