pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.13736 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 1 theorem link

Blackbody Quasar and Radio Source (BBQSORS): A Candidate of Transitional Little Red Dots with a Tsim10⁴\ K Blackbody Spectrum

Yuxing Zhong , Xiaoyang Chen , Kohei Ichikawa , Youwen Kong , Kentaro Aoki , Satoshi Yamada , Tohru Nagao , Daisaburo Kido
show 7 more authors
Toshihiro Kawaguchi Yoshiki Matsuoka Toru Misawa Shoichiro Mizukoshi Masafusa Onoue Ayumi Takahashi Yoshiki Toba
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 12:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords quasarslittle red dotsblackbody spectrumUV continuumactive galactic nucleispectral energy distributiontransitional objectsradio-loud sources
0
0 comments X

The pith

A radio-loud quasar at z=1.715 shows a UV continuum that fits a 10000 K blackbody, indicating a transitional state from a Little Red Dot.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents spectroscopic observations of a radio-loud quasar at redshift 1.715 whose UV spectrum displays a pronounced Lambda shape between roughly 1500 and 3500 angstroms. This continuum curvature is reproduced well by a blackbody spectrum at about 10000 K, whereas standard quasar templates with dust extinction do not match the data. The same temperature also fits the broader UV-to-mid-infrared photometry when decomposed into three blackbody components for the central envelope, the dust torus, and cooler host dust. A marginal near-UV detection further suggests a V-shaped spectral energy distribution whose peak is shifted to shorter wavelengths than in Little Red Dots, matching the expected effect of the higher temperature. The authors interpret the object as caught in a brief phase during which a dense gas envelope like those in Little Red Dots has begun to fragment.

Core claim

The UV spectrum of this z=1.715 radio-loud quasar shows a Lambda-shaped continuum that is accurately reproduced by a blackbody with temperature T approximately 10000 K. This fit is preferred over dust-extincted standard quasar spectra and is consistent with the full UV-to-MIR spectral energy distribution decomposed into three blackbodies: an SMBH envelope at about 9700 K, a torus at about 1500 K, and host dust at about 80 K. A marginal GALEX detection suggests the V-shape occurs near 1400 angstroms, shifted blueward from Little Red Dots due to the temperature difference, implying the source is in a transitional state with a fragmenting LRD envelope.

What carries the argument

The blackbody spectrum at T approximately 10000 K fitted to the UV continuum, which physically represents the SMBH envelope and whose temperature contrast with the cooler approximately 5000 K photospheres of Little Red Dots accounts for the observed wavelength shift of the V-shaped spectral feature.

If this is right

  • The source illustrates an evolutionary pathway from Little Red Dots to unobscured quasars through progressive fragmentation of the dense gas envelope.
  • Similar transitional objects may be identifiable in radio-loud AGN samples by their Lambda-shaped UV continua and shifted V-shaped SEDs.
  • The blackbody model implies that parts of the envelope are becoming optically thin, allowing direct view of the central engine.
  • X-ray and radio detections could be signatures of accretion activity that emerges during envelope breakup.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If such transitional sources are common, the lifetime of the Little Red Dot phase could be estimated from their relative numbers in flux-limited surveys.
  • Black hole growth models may need to include a brief hot blackbody phase before the quasar becomes fully visible.
  • Higher-resolution imaging or time-domain monitoring could directly test whether the envelope shows signs of breakup or variability in the blackbody component.

Load-bearing premise

That the blackbody component corresponds to a physical dense gas envelope around the supermassive black hole whose fragmentation drives the transition to a visible quasar, rather than serving only as a convenient mathematical description of the observed continuum shape.

What would settle it

Deeper UV spectroscopy or photometry that shows the continuum deviating significantly from the 10000 K blackbody curve or fails to confirm the predicted V-shaped turnover near 1400 angstroms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.13736 by Ayumi Takahashi, Daisaburo Kido, Kentaro Aoki, Kohei Ichikawa, Masafusa Onoue, Satoshi Yamada, Shoichiro Mizukoshi, Tohru Nagao, Toru Misawa, Toshihiro Kawaguchi, Xiaoyang Chen, Yoshiki Matsuoka, Yoshiki Toba, Youwen Kong, Yuxing Zhong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of observations for the radio-loud blackbody quasar BBQSORS. Top: Optical images collected from Subaru HSC-SSP, IR images collected from Spitzer, and VLASS radio images at 3 GHz observed at Epoch 2 and 3. The false-color image is rendered using HSC g + r + z, overlaid with the white contours representing the VLASS Epoch 2 imaging. The blue circle represents the PFS fiber with a diameter of 1. ′′02… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: X-ray detection of BBQSORS with XMM-Newton. The left panel presents the EPIC/pn image in the 0.4–7.2 keV (rest-frame ∼1–20 keV) band, detected at a significance of 3.42σ. The green circle indicates the source region with a radius of 20′′. The right panel shows the EPIC/pn spectrum folded with the energy response (blue squares) and the best-fitting model (black curve), consisting of source and background co… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: SED fitting for UV-to-MIR photometry with three blackbody components representing the SMBH envelope (blue), AGN dust torus (brown), and galactic dust (golden), plus a UV PL with fixed βλ − 2, assuming AV = 0.30 derived from the PFS spectrum (purple dotted line). The purple solid line represents an LRD-like MBB component with T = 5000 K and βMBB = 0, with its amplitude scaled according to L ∝ T 4 . The dust… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: Comparison of the spectrum for BBQSORS with the median spectra of typical blue quasars (cQSOs) and of red quasars (rQSOs) suffering moderate dust reddening (Fawcett et al. 2022), where all spectra are normalized at 4000 Å. We de-redden the PFS spectrum assuming a PL dust extinction curve with AV = 0.7 and AV = 1.2. Middle: The same as the top panel, while the de￾reddening adopts an SMC-like extinction… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic illustration of two possible evolutionary path￾ways linking LRDs and BBQSORS discussed in Section 3.2.1. In Path I, BBQSORS represent the final stage of high-z LRD evolu￾tion, in which the cooler SMBH envelope (T ∼ 5000K) evolves into a hotter, bloated envelope with T ∼ 104 K while the system becomes less obscured. In this stage, broad-line region emission (e.g., Mg ii and C iii]) and radio jets … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the SED of the blackbody quasar BBQSORS (this study; black solid line) with those of the X-Ray Dot (moss-green solid line; Hviding et al. 2026), transitioning LRDs (Forge I and II; blue and cyan lines, respectively; Fu et al. 2025), and stacked LRDs at z ∼ 6 (brown filled circles; Akins et al. 2025). Their optical-to-IR continua are broadly reproduced by (modified) blackbody models with diffe… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of BBQSORS with LRDs at z < 4.5 from de Graaff et al. (2025) and the XRD from Hviding et al. (2026) in the λV–TBB, LBB–TBB, and LHα–LBB planes. Here, λrest represents the wavelength where the V-shaped feature emerges. In the left panel, the solid line indicates the Balmer limit. In the middle panel, the solid line shows the expected LBB–TBB relation for a fiducial LRD-like photospheric radius (I… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A simple blackbody spectrum with T = 104 K at dif￾ferent redshifts, overlaid on the stacked LRD photometries at z = 6 (Akins et al. 2025) and the normalized transmission curves of the JWST NIRCAM filters. While high-z LRDs are selected based on their characteristic V-shaped SEDs transitioning LRDs character￾ized by blackbody quasars exhibit the Λ-shaped SED. those of C iii]λ1909 and Mg iiλ2800 given the 1σ… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: SPHEREx spectrophotometry (gray solid line) fitted by S 3Fit. From left to right, peaks of the modeled line components indicate Hα, O iλ8446, and Paβ. This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, and NEOWISE, which is a pro… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report Subaru/PFS spectroscopic follow-up of a radio-loud quasar at $z=1.715$ from the UNVEIL radio AGN catalog and with X-ray detections. The PFS spectrum displays a broad MgII emission line with an $\mathrm{FWHM}\gtrsim4000\ km/s$, accompanied by a narrow absorption feature. The spectrum reveals a characteristic $\Lambda$-shape over the rest-frame wavelength ranging $\sim1500-3500\ \r{A}$. This underlying UV continuum is too curved to be reproduced by simply applying dust extinction to the spectrum of typical unobscured quasars. Alternatively, it is well described by a blackbody spectrum with a temperature of $T\approx10000\ K$. This result is in good agreement with its UV to MIR photometry that can be well modeled by three blackbody components representing the SMBH envelope ($\mathit{T}\approx9700\ K$), dust torus ($T\approx1500\ K$), and host galaxy dust ($T\approx80\ K$). The source is marginally detected in the GALEX NUV, revealing a potential V-shaped spectral energy distribution around $1400\ \r{A}$, reminiscent of the spectral feature reported for recently discussed LRDs whose V-shapes occur around $3000-4000\ \r{A}$. This wavelength shift is broadly consistent with the temperature contrast between our blackbody component, with $T\sim10^4\ K$, and the lower effective temperature of $T\sim5000\ K$ expected for an optically thick photosphere surrounding the SMBH in LRDs. These properties suggest that this source might be caught in a transient evolutionary phase in which the dense gas envelope characteristic of LRD has begun to fragment, allowing us to witness the emergence of a quasar from an LRD-like state.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports Subaru/PFS spectroscopy of a radio-loud quasar at z=1.715, showing a broad MgII line (FWHM ≳4000 km/s) and a Λ-shaped UV continuum (rest-frame 1500-3500 Å) that cannot be reproduced by dust extinction applied to typical unobscured quasar spectra but is instead well fit by a T≈10000 K blackbody. This is consistent with three-component blackbody modeling of the UV-to-MIR photometry (SMBH envelope T≈9700 K, torus T≈1500 K, host dust T≈80 K). The source shows a marginal GALEX NUV detection suggesting a V-shaped SED peaking near 1400 Å, interpreted as a transitional state from LRDs (whose V-shapes occur at 3000-4000 Å) due to fragmentation of a dense SMBH envelope, enabled by the higher temperature contrast with LRD photospheres (T∼5000 K).

Significance. If the blackbody preference and evolutionary interpretation hold, the result would identify a rare transitional AGN between LRDs and unobscured quasars, providing a concrete temperature-based mechanism for the observed shift in the V-shape wavelength and supporting envelope fragmentation as a key evolutionary step.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and spectral analysis] Abstract and spectral analysis section: the central claim that the Λ-shaped continuum (1500-3500 Å) is too curved for dust extinction on typical quasars and is instead well described by a T≈10000 K blackbody is presented without any reported χ², BIC, likelihood-ratio, or other quantitative model-comparison statistics between the blackbody and dust-extincted quasar models on the same PFS spectrum. This comparison is load-bearing for the transitional interpretation, as the temperature contrast alone does not establish physical preference over a convenient parametrization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the blackbody temperature as T≈10000 K while the photometry fit gives T≈9700 K; clarify whether these are independent or linked and report uncertainties on both.
  2. [Results] The narrow absorption feature on MgII is mentioned but not characterized (e.g., velocity, equivalent width); add a brief description or figure inset for completeness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and spectral analysis] Abstract and spectral analysis section: the central claim that the Λ-shaped continuum (1500-3500 Å) is too curved for dust extinction on typical quasars and is instead well described by a T≈10000 K blackbody is presented without any reported χ², BIC, likelihood-ratio, or other quantitative model-comparison statistics between the blackbody and dust-extincted quasar models on the same PFS spectrum. This comparison is load-bearing for the transitional interpretation, as the temperature contrast alone does not establish physical preference over a convenient parametrization.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative model-comparison statistics are needed to rigorously support the preference for the blackbody over a dust-extincted typical quasar spectrum. In the revised manuscript we will add χ², BIC, and likelihood-ratio test results for both models fitted directly to the PFS spectrum over 1500–3500 Å. This will provide a statistical basis for the claim and strengthen the transitional interpretation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central result follows from direct fitting of the observed PFS spectrum and multi-band photometry to a T≈10000 K blackbody component, presented as an alternative to dust-extincted quasar templates. This fit is not renamed as a prediction, nor does any equation reduce to a self-defined input. The transitional LRD interpretation rests on external comparison to literature LRD temperatures (~5000 K) and V-shape locations, without load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work. No step exhibits self-definitional closure or fitted-input-as-prediction; the derivation remains self-contained against the reported data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim depends on fitting a blackbody to the UV continuum and assuming it traces a physical envelope whose temperature contrast with LRDs explains the observed V-shape shift.

free parameters (2)
  • Blackbody temperature = ≈10000 K
    Fitted directly to the observed UV continuum shape
  • Three-component temperatures = 9700 K, 1500 K, 80 K
    Fitted to UV-MIR photometry to represent envelope, torus, and host dust
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The curved UV continuum is produced by thermal emission from an optically thick SMBH envelope rather than alternative continuum mechanisms
    Invoked to prefer the blackbody model over dust-extincted quasar templates
invented entities (1)
  • SMBH envelope no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for the observed 10,000 K blackbody component
    Newly postulated component whose existence is inferred from the spectral fit

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5724 in / 1482 out tokens · 54594 ms · 2026-05-15T12:13:10.498519+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • BlackBodyRadiationDeep.lean blackBodyRadiationDeepCert (wien_zero_cost, stefan_boltzmann_zero_cost, off_match_positive) echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    the spectrum reveals a characteristic Λ-shape... well described by a blackbody spectrum with a temperature of T≈10000 K... three blackbody components representing the SMBH envelope (T≈9700 K)

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e

    Ahumada, R., Allende Prieto, C., Almeida, A., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 2020

  2. [2]

    2018, , 70, S4, 10.1093/pasj/psx066

    Aihara, H., Arimoto, N., Armstrong, R., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S4, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx066

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psx066 2018

  3. [3]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  4. [4]

    T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´an, ´A., Kov´acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  5. [5]

    C., & Dexter, J

    Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2026, ApJ, 996, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a 2026

  6. [6]

    J., Aboobaker, A

    Bock, J. J., Aboobaker, A. M., Adamo, J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2be2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2be2 2026

  7. [7]

    Chen, K., Li, Z., Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025a, ApJL, 994, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1955

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1955 2041

  8. [8]

    2025, S3Fit: Simultaneous Spectrum and photometric-SED Fitting code for galaxy observations, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2503.024

    Chen, X. 2025, S3Fit: Simultaneous Spectrum and photometric-SED Fitting code for galaxy observations, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2503.024

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.02801, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.02801

    Chen, X., Ichikawa, K., Akiyama, M., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.02801, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.02801

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02801

  10. [10]

    R., et al

    Cova, F., Gastaldello, F., Wik, D. R., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834644

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834644 2019

  11. [11]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 425 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+2013), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/328. Originally published in: IPAC/Caltech (2013) de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.21820

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.21820 2021

  12. [12]

    A., Alexander, D

    Fawcett, V . A., Alexander, D. M., Rosario, D. J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1254, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac945

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac945 2022

  13. [13]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.02096, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.02096

    Fu, S., Zhang, Z., Jiang, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.02096, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.02096

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.02096 2025

  14. [14]

    J., et al

    Gabriel, C., Denby, M., Fyfe, D. J., et al. 2004, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 314, The XMM-Newton SAS - Distributed Development and Maintenance of a Large Science Analysis System: A Critical Analysis, ed. F. Ochsenbein, M. G. Allen, & D. Egret, 759

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Gordon, K. D. 2024, Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7023, doi: 10.21105/joss.07023

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.07023 2024

  16. [16]

    D., Fitzpatrick, E

    Gordon, K. D., Fitzpatrick, E. L., Massa, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4be1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4be1 2024

  17. [17]

    W., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al

    Gwyn, S., McConnachie, A. W., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al. 2025, AJ, 170, 324, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ae03ab

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae03ab 2025

  18. [18]

    N., Maiolino, R., Juodˇzbalis, I., et al

    Hainline, K. N., Maiolino, R., Juodˇzbalis, I., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9920

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9920 2025

  19. [19]

    F., Strauss, M

    Hopkins, P. F., Strauss, M. A., Hall, P. B., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1112, doi: 10.1086/423291

    work page doi:10.1086/423291 2004

  20. [20]

    Hosokawa, T., Omukai, K., & Yorke, H. W. 2012, ApJ, 756, 93, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/93

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/756/1/93 2012

  21. [21]

    W., Inayoshi, K., Omukai, K., & Yoshida, N

    Hosokawa, T., Yorke, H. W., Inayoshi, K., Omukai, K., & Yoshida, N. 2013, ApJ, 778, 178, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/178

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/778/2/178 2013

  22. [22]

    E., de Graaff, A., Liu, H., et al

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Liu, H., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.09778, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.09778

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09778 2026

  23. [23]

    2025, ApJL, 988, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adea66

    Inayoshi, K. 2025, ApJL, 988, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adea66

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adea66 2025

  24. [24]

    2016, ApJ, 828, 110, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/110

    Inayoshi, K., & Haiman, Z. 2016, ApJ, 828, 110, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/110

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/828/2/110 2016

  25. [25]

    Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03130, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.03130

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.03130 2025

  26. [26]

    S., & Noda, H

    Inayoshi, K., Kimura, S. S., & Noda, H. 2025, PASJ, 77, 811, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf050

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf050 2025

  27. [27]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd 2025

  28. [28]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 IRSA, & SSC. 2020, Spitzer Enhanced Imaging Products, NASA IPAC DataSet, IRSA433, doi: 10.26131/IRSA433

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 2020

  29. [29]

    2025, MNRAS, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867 Juodˇzbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2367

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1867 2025

  30. [30]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1898 2025

  31. [31]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 3109, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1771

    Fotopoulou, S. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3109, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1771

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1771 2019

  32. [32]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0 2023

  33. [33]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d 2025

  34. [34]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V ., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265 2024

  35. [35]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e

    Kokubo, M., & Harikane, Y . 2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e 2025

  36. [36]

    A., Chandler, C

    Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 035001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb 2020

  37. [37]

    2008, A&A, 486, 359, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809538

    Leccardi, A., & Molendi, S. 2008, A&A, 486, 359, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809538

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809538 2008

  38. [38]

    Li, Z., Inayoshi, K., Chen, K., Ichikawa, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, ApJ, 980, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb 2025

  39. [39]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6565

    Lin, X., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6565

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6565 2024

  40. [40]

    E., & Ma, Y

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y .-F., Quataert, E., Greene, J. E., & Ma, Y . 2025, ApJ, 994, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19 2025

  41. [41]

    E., Setton, D

    Ma, Y ., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08032, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08032

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08032

  42. [42]

    E., V olonteri, M., et al

    Ma, Y ., Greene, J. E., V olonteri, M., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.02662, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.02662 BBQSORS 15

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.02662

  43. [43]

    ApJS 251(1), 6 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/abb82a arXiv:1612.05242 [astro-ph.IM]

    Magnier, E. A., Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abb82a 2020

  44. [44]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  45. [45]

    2026, ApJ, 998, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae32f3

    Nandal, D., & Loeb, A. 2026, ApJ, 998, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae32f3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae32f3 2026

  46. [46]

    2026, ApJ, 997, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d6d Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., et al

    Obuchi, S., Ichikawa, K., Yamada, S., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d6d Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d6d 2026

  47. [47]

    T., Hall, P

    Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Vanden Berk, D. E., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 1131, doi: 10.1086/377014

    work page doi:10.1086/377014 2003

  48. [48]

    T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L

    Richards, G. T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., et al. 2006, ApJS, 166, 470, doi: 10.1086/506525

    work page doi:10.1086/506525 2006

  49. [49]

    J., Alexander, D

    Rosario, D. J., Alexander, D. M., Moldon, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 5283, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1653

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1653 2021

  50. [50]

    D., Farag, E., Bellinger, E

    Santarelli, A. D., Farag, E., Bellinger, E. P., et al. 2026, ApJL, 998, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae3713

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae3713 2026

  51. [51]

    C., Vrba, F

    Schneider, A. C., Vrba, F. J., Bruursema, J., et al. 2025, AJ, 170, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ade43c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ade43c 2025

  52. [52]

    P., Richards, G

    Schneider, D. P., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., et al. 2010, AJ, 139, 2360, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2360

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2360 2010

  53. [53]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., Spilker, J. S., et al. 2025, ApJL, 991, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b 2025

  54. [54]

    T., Strauss, M

    Shen, Y ., Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 194, 45, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/45 SPHEREx Team. 2025, SPHEREx Quick Release Spectral Images - QR2, IPAC, doi: 10.26131/IRSA652

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/45 2011

  55. [55]

    Q., Naidu, R

    Sun, W. Q., Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20929, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.20929

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20929 2026

  56. [56]

    2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    Tamura, N., Yabe, K., Koshida, S., et al. 2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    13096, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, ed

    Series, V ol. 13096, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, ed. J. J. Bryant, K. Motohara, & J. R. D. Vernet, 1309605, doi: 10.1117/12.3015967

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3015967

  58. [58]

    S., Akins, H

    Tanaka, T. S., Akins, H. B., Harikane, Y ., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae145f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae145f 2025

  59. [59]

    A., Quataert, E., & Murray, N

    Thompson, T. A., Quataert, E., & Murray, N. 2005, ApJ, 630, 167, doi: 10.1086/431923

    work page doi:10.1086/431923 2005

  60. [60]

    2006, ApJ, 650, 57, doi: 10.1086/506376 Vanden Berk, D

    Tsuzuki, Y ., Kawara, K., Yoshii, Y ., et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 57, doi: 10.1086/506376

    work page doi:10.1086/506376 2006

  61. [61]

    H., White, R

    Urrutia, T., Becker, R. H., White, R. L., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1095, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/1095 Vanden Berk, D. E., Wesolowski, S. C., Yeckley, M. J., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 2745, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa411 V´eron-Cetty, M.-P., Joly, M., & V´eron, P. 2004, A&A, 417, 515, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035714

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/698/2/1095 2009

  62. [62]

    Vestergaard, M., & Osmer, P. S. 2009, ApJ, 699, 800, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/800

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/800 2009

  63. [63]

    Vestergaard, M., & Wilkes, B. J. 2001, ApJS, 134, 1, doi: 10.1086/320357

    work page doi:10.1086/320357 2001

  64. [64]

    J., Yang, C., Wang, H., & Zhang, S

    Wang, T., Ferland, G. J., Yang, C., Wang, H., & Zhang, S. 2016, ApJ, 824, 106, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/106

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/824/2/106 2016

  65. [65]

    A., Coriat, M., Traulsen, I., et al

    Webb, N. A., Coriat, M., Traulsen, I., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A136, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937353

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937353 2020

  66. [66]

    C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al

    Williams, C. C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3f17

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3f17 2024

  67. [67]

    Willingale, R., Starling, R. L. C., Beardmore, A. P., Tanvir, N. R., & O’Brien, P. T. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 394, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt175

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt175 2013

  68. [68]

    2015, Nature, 518, 512, doi: 10.1038/nature14241

    Wu, X.-B., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2015, Nature, 518, 512, doi: 10.1038/nature14241

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14241 2015

  69. [69]

    T., et al

    Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., Ananna, T. T., et al. 2024, ApJL, 974, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba 2024

  70. [70]

    Zhang, Z., Jiang, L., Liu, W., & Ho, L. C. 2025a, ApJ, 985, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adcb3e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcb3e

  71. [71]

    2025c, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.05180

    Zhang, Z., Li, M., Oguri, M., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.05180, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.05180

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.05180

  72. [72]

    K., Sugahara, Y ., et al

    Zhong, Y ., Inoue, A. K., Sugahara, Y ., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 4531, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae798

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae798 2024

  73. [73]

    2025, ApJS, 281, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae03c3

    Zhong, Y ., Ichikawa, K., Hildebrandt, H., et al. 2025, ApJS, 281, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae03c3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae03c3 2025