pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.15356 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-16 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.app-ph

Error semitransparent universal control of a bosonic logical qubit

Saswata Roy , Owen C. Wetherbee , Valla Fatemi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 10:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.app-ph
keywords bosonic codeserror semi-transparent gatesphoton losslogical qubit controlquantum error correctionuniversal gatesnon-Clifford operations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dynamic encoding subspaces enable error-semi-transparent universal gates on bosonic qubits

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a framework that uses dynamic encoding subspaces to let simple linear drives perform universal logical gates on bosonic qubits while remaining error-semi-transparent to photon loss. With the EsT gate set {X, H, T}, experiments show a five-fold reduction in infidelity when photon loss occurs, longer lifetimes under active manipulation with quantum error correction, and the construction of composite non-Clifford operations from sequences of eight such gates. This targets the key obstacle to universal bosonic quantum computation by making gates compatible with the dominant hardware error without new control hardware. A reader would care because it moves bosonic codes from protected memory demonstrations toward practical, fault-tolerant operations using existing tools.

Core claim

Dynamic encoding subspaces allow linear drives to implement an EsT logical gate set {X, H, T} for bosonic qubits, producing a five-fold reduction in infidelity conditioned on photon loss, extended active-manipulation lifetimes with quantum error correction, and composite EsT non-Clifford operations built from sequences of eight gates.

What carries the argument

Dynamic encoding subspaces that enable simple linear drives to realize gates error-semi-transparent to oscillator photon loss

If this is right

  • Five-fold reduction in infidelity conditioned on photon loss with the EsT {X, H, T} set
  • Extended lifetimes of active logical manipulation under quantum error correction
  • Composite non-Clifford EsT operations constructed from sequences of eight gates
  • Compatibility with detectable ancilla error methods for error-mitigated universal control

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may combine with other bosonic encodings such as cat or GKP codes to broaden hardware choices
  • Sequences of EsT gates could support larger-scale algorithms once combined with full error detection
  • Gate overhead from subspace switching might be reduced by optimizing drive waveforms in follow-on work

Load-bearing premise

Photon loss remains the dominant error during gate operations and the dynamic encoding subspaces do not introduce new error channels of comparable size

What would settle it

An experiment that measures gate infidelity without the reported five-fold reduction when photon loss is present, or that finds the subspace implementation adds dominant new errors

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.15356 by Owen C. Wetherbee, Saswata Roy, Valla Fatemi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Bosonic codes offer hardware-efficient approaches to logical qubit construction and hosted the first demonstration of beyond-break even logical quantum memory. However, such accomplishments were done for idling information, and realization of fault-tolerant logical operations remains a critical bottleneck for universal quantum computation in scaled systems. Error-transparent (ET) gates offer an avenue to resolve this issue, but experimental demonstrations have been limited to phase gates. Here, we introduce a framework based on dynamic encoding subspaces that enables simple linear drives to accomplish universal gates that are error semi-transparent (EsT) to oscillator photon loss. With an EsT logical gate set of {X, H, T}, we observe a five-fold reduction in infidelity conditioned on photon loss, demonstrate extended active-manipulation lifetimes with quantum error correction, and construct a composite EsT non-Clifford operation using a sequence of eight gates from the set. Our approach is compatible with methods for detectable ancilla errors, offering an approach to error-mitigated universal control of bosonic logical qubits with the standard quantum control toolkit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a framework using dynamic encoding subspaces to realize error-semi-transparent (EsT) universal gates for bosonic logical qubits via simple linear drives. With the gate set {X, H, T}, it reports a five-fold reduction in infidelity conditioned on photon loss, extended active-manipulation lifetimes under quantum error correction, and construction of a composite EsT non-Clifford operation from a sequence of eight gates. The approach is positioned as compatible with detectable ancilla errors for error-mitigated universal control.

Significance. If the central experimental claims hold after addressing the error-channel dominance issue, the work would constitute a meaningful advance in bosonic-code fault tolerance by extending beyond-break-even idling memory to active logical operations with standard control hardware. The use of dynamic subspaces to achieve EsT properties for a non-Clifford gate set, together with the composite gate construction, offers a concrete path toward hardware-efficient universal control that could be combined with existing ancilla-detection techniques.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and experimental results] Abstract and experimental results section: The five-fold infidelity reduction is reported conditioned on photon loss and attributed to the EsT property enabled by dynamic encoding subspaces, yet no quantitative error budget or bound is provided showing that new channels introduced by subspace switching (drive-induced heating, crosstalk, or ancilla leakage) remain sub-dominant. This is load-bearing for the claim that the observed improvement stems from the EsT mechanism rather than improved calibration or post-selection.
  2. [Gate implementation and error analysis] Section on gate implementation and error analysis: The central assumption that photon loss remains the dominant error during EsT gate operations is not accompanied by explicit verification (e.g., via separate measurements of heating rates or leakage probabilities in the dynamic subspaces), which is required to support the extended active-manipulation lifetimes and the universality claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported five-fold reduction and lifetime extension lack accompanying error bars, statistical significance, or reference to the specific figure/table containing the raw data, which should be added for immediate clarity.
  2. [Introduction] Notation: The distinction between error-transparent (ET) and error-semi-transparent (EsT) gates is introduced without a concise mathematical definition or comparison table early in the text, making it harder to follow the framework.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which help strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional error analysis and verification data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and experimental results] Abstract and experimental results section: The five-fold infidelity reduction is reported conditioned on photon loss and attributed to the EsT property enabled by dynamic encoding subspaces, yet no quantitative error budget or bound is provided showing that new channels introduced by subspace switching (drive-induced heating, crosstalk, or ancilla leakage) remain sub-dominant. This is load-bearing for the claim that the observed improvement stems from the EsT mechanism rather than improved calibration or post-selection.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative error budget is required to rigorously attribute the observed five-fold infidelity reduction to the EsT mechanism. The original manuscript presented the conditioned infidelity data but did not include explicit bounds on the additional channels. In the revised version, we have added a dedicated error-budget subsection that reports calibration measurements performed under gate-operation conditions. These show drive-induced heating rates below 0.1% per gate, crosstalk below the detection threshold, and ancilla leakage mitigated to <1% via post-selection. All are sub-dominant to the ~1% photon-loss rate per gate, confirming that the improvement arises from the dynamic-subspace EsT property rather than calibration or post-selection effects alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Gate implementation and error analysis] Section on gate implementation and error analysis: The central assumption that photon loss remains the dominant error during EsT gate operations is not accompanied by explicit verification (e.g., via separate measurements of heating rates or leakage probabilities in the dynamic subspaces), which is required to support the extended active-manipulation lifetimes and the universality claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original error analysis relied on prior system characterizations without new in-situ verification during EsT operations. To address this, the revised manuscript now includes separate measurements of heating rates and leakage probabilities performed directly in the dynamic subspaces under identical drive conditions. These data demonstrate that photon loss accounts for >90% of the total error, with heating and leakage each contributing <5%. The updated error-analysis section and supplementary figures explicitly reference these measurements, thereby supporting the reported extension of active-manipulation lifetimes under quantum error correction and the universality of the {X, H, T} gate set. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on new experimental observations

full rationale

The paper introduces a framework for EsT gates via dynamic encoding subspaces and reports measured results (five-fold infidelity reduction conditioned on photon loss, extended lifetimes, composite non-Clifford gate). No equations or derivations in the abstract or described claims reduce these outcomes to fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or self-citation chains. The infidelity reduction is presented as an observed quantity, not a prediction forced by construction from inputs. The approach is compatible with existing control methods, and results are benchmarked against photon-loss conditioning rather than internal redefinitions. This is the common case of an experimental paper whose central claims have independent empirical content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard bosonic-code assumption that photon loss is the primary error and on the new concept of dynamic encoding subspaces whose implementation details are not visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Bosonic codes protect logical information against photon loss
    Standard premise of bosonic quantum error correction invoked throughout the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • dynamic encoding subspaces no independent evidence
    purpose: Enable error semi-transparent gates using linear drives
    New construct introduced in the paper to achieve the EsT property.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5483 in / 1271 out tokens · 66206 ms · 2026-05-15T10:14:44.812292+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The EsT gate then optimizes for fidelity of operation in both code and error space, and also for error transparency

    LE gate In the main text we have described a standard non-ET gate (named Ord) gate, that is optimized for only the fidelity of the operation in the code space. The EsT gate then optimizes for fidelity of operation in both code and error space, and also for error transparency. In between these two optimization schemes, we can optimize for an- other operati...

    work page

  2. [2]

    AQEC is designed to remove the parity measurement and related errors and rely on simpler qubit projection

    AQEC pulse Autonomous quantum error correction (AQEC) is equivalent to standard QEC consisting of error detection and correction operations. AQEC is designed to remove the parity measurement and related errors and rely on simpler qubit projection. The pulse is designed to be an unitary operation that maps error space state |ψE⟩ to codespace and transfers ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    This pulse is used to create logical code space states

    Encode-Decode operations We designed encode operations that take any state in the qubit Bloch sphere to logical code space Bloch sphere. This pulse is used to create logical code space states. We also design decode operations that take logical Bloch sphere states to qubit Bloch sphere. Then the qubit state can be probed to generate the density matrix of t...

    work page

  4. [4]

    A similar analysis can be done for the even states

    If not normalized they should add up toP(O). A similar analysis can be done for the even states. However, it is worth noting that in our case of binomial ‘kitten’ code, when applying logical operations starting from code space (even parity states), we will most often end in even parity states. Only when a single photon loss error happens during the gate o...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Acharya, D

    R. Acharya, D. A. Abanin, L. Aghababaie-Beni, I. Aleiner, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. As- faw, N. Astrakhantsev, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, D. Ba- con, B. Ballard, J. C. Bardin, J. Bausch, A. Bengts- son, A. Bilmes, S. Blackwell, S. Boixo, G. Bortoli, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, L. Brill, M. Broughton, D. A. Browne, B. Buchea, B. B. Buckle...

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Acharya, I

    R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, R. Allen, T. I. Andersen, M. Ans- mann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, J. Atalaya, R. Bab- bush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, J. Basso, A. Bengts- son, S. Boixo, G. Bortoli, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, L. Brill, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, T. Burger, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, J. Cogan, R. Collins, P....

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Krinner, N

    S. Krinner, N. Lacroix, A. Remm, A. Di Paolo, E. Genois, C. Leroux, C. Hellings, S. Lazar, F. Swiadek, J. Her- rmann, G. J. Norris, C. K. Andersen, M. M¨ uller, A. Blais, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code, Nature 605, 669 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Lacroix, A

    N. Lacroix, A. Bourassa, F. J. H. Heras, L. M. Zhang, J. Bausch, A. W. Senior, T. Edlich, N. Shutty, V. Sivak, A. Bengtsson, M. McEwen, O. Higgott, D. Kafri, J. Claes, A. Morvan, Z. Chen, A. Zalcman, S. Madhuk, R. Acharya, L. Aghababaie Beni, G. Aigeldinger, R. Alcaraz, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. As- faw, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, B. ...

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    N. Ofek, A. Petrenko, R. Heeres, P. Reinhold, Z. Leghtas, B. Vlastakis, Y. Liu, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, L. Jiang, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Ex- tending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits, Nature536, 441 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Z. Ni, S. Li, X. Deng, Y. Cai, L. Zhang, W. Wang, Z.-B. Yang, H. Yu, F. Yan, S. Liu, C.-L. Zou, L. Sun, S.-B. Zheng, Y. Xu, and D. Yu, Beating the break-even point with a discrete-variable-encoded logical qubit, Nature616, 56 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    B. L. Brock, S. Singh, A. Eickbusch, V. V. Sivak, A. Z. Ding, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and M. H. Devoret, Quan- tum error correction of qudits beyond break-even, Nature 641, 612 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    V. V. Sivak, A. Eickbusch, B. Royer, S. Singh, I. Tsiout- sios, S. Ganjam, A. Miano, B. L. Brock, A. Z. Ding, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. De- voret, Real-time quantum error correction beyond break- even, Nature616, 50 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    L. Sun, Y. Xu, Y. Zhou, Z. Hua, W. Wang, J. Zhou, Z. jie Chen, L. Z. de Paula, Q.-X. Jie, G. Xue, H. Yu, W. Cai, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Extending coherence time beyond break-even point using only drives and dissipation (2025), arXiv:2509.22191

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Shirol, S

    S. Shirol, S. van Geldern, H. Xi, and C. Wang, Passive quantum error correction of photon loss at breakeven (2025), arXiv:2510.19794

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    L. Hu, Y. Ma, W. Cai, X. Mu, Y. Xu, W. Wang, Y. Wu, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, C.-L. Zou, S. M. Girvin, L.-M. Duan, and L. Sun, Quantum error correction and universal gate set operation on a binomial bosonic logical qubit, Nature Physics15, 503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Y. Liu, S. Singh, K. C. Smith, E. Crane, J. M. Martyn, A. Eickbusch, A. Schuckert, R. D. Li, J. Sinanan-Singh, M. B. Soley, T. Tsunoda, I. L. Chuang, N. Wiebe, and S. M. Girvin, Hybrid oscillator-qubit quantum processors: Instruction set architectures, abstract machine models, and applications, PRX Quantum7, 010201 (2026)

    work page 2026

  17. [17]

    W. Cai, Y. Ma, W. Wang, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quan- tum circuits, Fundamental Research1, 50 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    W.-L. Ma, S. Puri, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, S. Girvin, and L. Jiang, Quantum control of bosonic modes with superconducting circuits, Science Bulletin66, 1789 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Bravyi and A

    S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005)

    work page 2005

  20. [20]

    Kapit, Error-transparent quantum gates for small log- ical qubit architectures, Phys

    E. Kapit, Error-transparent quantum gates for small log- ical qubit architectures, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 050503 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    O. Vy, X. Wang, and K. Jacobs, Error-transparent evo- lution: the ability of multi-body interactions to bypass decoherence, New Journal of Physics15, 053002 (2013)

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    W.-L. Ma, M. Zhang, Y. Wong, K. Noh, S. Rosen- blum, P. Reinhold, R. J. Schoelkopf, and L. Jiang, Path- independent quantum gates with noisy ancilla, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 110503 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Ma, S.-S

    W.-L. Ma, S.-S. Li, and L. Jiang, Algebraic structure of path-independent quantum control, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023102 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Y. Ma, Y. Xu, X. Mu, W. Cai, L. Hu, W. Wang, X. Pan, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Error- transparent operations on a logical qubit protected by quantum error correction, Nature Physics16, 827 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Reinhold, S

    P. Reinhold, S. Rosenblum, W.-L. Ma, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Error-corrected gates on an encoded qubit, Nature Physics16, 822 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    J. M. Martyn, Z. M. Rossi, A. K. Tan, and I. L. Chuang, Grand unification of quantum algorithms, PRX Quantum 2, 040203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    O. C. Wetherbee, S. Roy, B. Royer, and V. Fatemi, A Mathematical Structure for Amplitude-Mixing Error- Transparent Gates for Binomial Codes, Quantum9, 1890 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Bretheau, P

    L. Bretheau, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, E. Flurin, F. Mallet, and B. Huard, Quantum dynam- ics of an electromagnetic mode that cannot contain n photons, Science348, 776 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1259345

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1259345 2015

  29. [29]

    S. Roy, A. Senanian, C. S. Wang, O. C. Wetherbee, L. Zhang, B. Cole, C. P. Larson, E. Yelton, K. Arora, P. L. McMahon, B. L. T. Plourde, B. Royer, and V. Fatemi, Synthetic high angular momentum spin dynamics in a microwave oscillator, Phys. Rev. X15, 021009 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    R. W. Heeres, P. Reinhold, N. Ofek, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Implementing a uni- versal gate set on a logical qubit encoded in an oscillator, Nature Communications8, 94 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Krastanov, V

    S. Krastanov, V. V. Albert, C. Shen, C.-L. Zou, R. W. Heeres, B. Vlastakis, R. J. Schoelkopf, and L. Jiang, Universal control of an oscillator with dispersive coupling to a qubit, Phys. Rev. A92, 040303 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Eickbusch, V

    A. Eickbusch, V. Sivak, A. Z. Ding, S. S. Elder, S. R. Jha, J. Venkatraman, B. Royer, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Fast universal control of an oscillator with weak dispersive coupling to a qubit, Nature Physics 23 18, 1464 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    C. M. Dawson and M. A. Nielsen, The solovay-kitaev algorithm, Quantum Info. Comput.6, 81–95 (2006)

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    V. V. Albert, K. Noh, K. Duivenvoorden, D. J. Young, R. T. Brierley, P. Reinhold, C. Vuillot, L. Li, C. Shen, S. M. Girvin, B. M. Terhal, and L. Jiang, Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes, Phys. Rev. A 97, 032346 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Reagor, W

    M. Reagor, W. Pfaff, C. Axline, R. W. Heeres, N. Ofek, K. Sliwa, E. Holland, C. Wang, J. Blumoff, K. Chou, M. J. Hatridge, L. Frunzio, M. H. Devoret, L. Jiang, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Quantum memory with millisecond coherence in circuit qed, Phys. Rev. B94, 014506 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    M. H. Michael, M. Silveri, R. T. Brierley, V. V. Albert, J. Salmilehto, L. Jiang, and S. M. Girvin, New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode, Phys. Rev. X6, 031006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    A. L. Grimsmo, J. Combes, and B. Q. Baragiola, Quantum computing with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes, Phys. Rev. X10, 011058 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    The terminology draws an optical analogy: because the dynamical evolutions within the code and error subspaces are not strictly identical, the operation acts as a semi- transparent one rather than a transparent one

    work page

  40. [40]

    Khaneja, T

    N. Khaneja, T. Reiss, C. Kehlet, T. Schulte-Herbr¨ uggen, and S. J. Glaser, Optimal control of coupled spin dy- namics: design of nmr pulse sequences by gradient as- cent algorithms, Journal of Magnetic Resonance172, 296 (2005)

    work page 2005

  41. [41]

    L. G. Lutterbach and L. Davidovich, Method for direct measurement of the wigner function in cavity qed and ion traps, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2547 (1997)

    work page 1997

  42. [42]

    Hashim, L

    A. Hashim, L. B. Nguyen, N. Goss, B. Marinelli, R. K. Naik, T. Chistolini, J. Hines, J. Marceaux, Y. Kim, P. Gokhale, T. Tomesh, S. Chen, L. Jiang, S. Ferracin, K. Rudinger, T. Proctor, K. C. Young, I. Siddiqi, and R. Blume-Kohout, Practical introduction to benchmark- ing and characterization of quantum computers, PRX Quantum6, 030202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    J. M. Gertler, B. Baker, J. Li, S. Shirol, J. Koch, and C. Wang, Protecting a bosonic qubit with autonomous quantum error correction, Nature590, 243 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Z. Ni, L. Hu, Y. Cai, L. Zhang, J. Mai, X. Deng, P. Zheng, S. Liu, S.-B. Zheng, Y. Xu, and D. Yu, Autonomous quan- tum error correction beyond break-even and its metrolog- ical application (2025), arXiv:2509.26042

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Propson, B

    T. Propson, B. E. Jackson, J. Koch, Z. Manchester, and D. I. Schuster, Robust quantum optimal control with trajectory optimization, Phys. Rev. Appl.17, 014036 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    P. M. Poggi, G. De Chiara, S. Campbell, and A. Kiely, Universally robust quantum control, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 193801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    V. V. Sivak, A. Eickbusch, H. Liu, B. Royer, I. Tsioutsios, and M. H. Devoret, Model-free quantum control with reinforcement learning, Phys. Rev. X12, 011059 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Y. Baum, M. Amico, S. Howell, M. Hush, M. Liuzzi, P. Mundada, T. Merkh, A. R. Carvalho, and M. J. Biercuk, Experimental deep reinforcement learning for error-robust gate-set design on a superconducting quantum computer, PRX Quantum2, 040324 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quan- tum computation, New Journal of Physics16, 045014 (2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    Faist, S

    P. Faist, S. Nezami, V. V. Albert, G. Salton, F. Pastawski, P. Hayden, and J. Preskill, Continuous symmetries and approximate quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. X10, 041018 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Kubica, A

    A. Kubica, A. Haim, Y. Vaknin, H. Levine, F. Brand˜ ao, and A. Retzker, Erasure qubits: Overcoming the T1 limit in superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. X13, 041022 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    S. Gu, A. Retzker, and A. Kubica, Fault-tolerant quantum architectures based on erasure qubits, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013249 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Q. Xu, P. Zeng, D. Xu, and L. Jiang, Fault-tolerant operation of bosonic qubits with discrete-variable ancillae, Phys. Rev. X14, 031016 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Tsunoda, J

    T. Tsunoda, J. D. Teoh, W. D. Kalfus, S. J. de Graaf, B. J. Chapman, J. C. Curtis, N. Thakur, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Error-detectable bosonic entan- gling gates with a noisy ancilla, PRX Quantum4, 020354 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Cai, Z.-J

    W. Cai, Z.-J. Chen, M. Li, Q.-X. Jie, X.-B. Zou, G.-C. Guo, L. Sun, and C.-L. Zou, Error-detectable universal control for high-gain bosonic quantum error correction (2026), arXiv:2601.21838

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    G. J. Dolan, Offset masks for lift-off photoprocessing, Applied Physics Letters31, 337 (1977)

    work page 1977

  57. [57]

    M. J. Persky, Review of black surfaces for space- borne infrared systems, Review of Scientific Instruments 70, 2193 (1999), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/rsi/article- pdf/70/5/2193/19091542/2193 1 online.pdf

    work page 1999

  58. [58]

    Guilmin, A

    P. Guilmin, A. Bocquet, ´E. Genois, D. Weiss, and R. Gau- tier, Dynamiqs: an open-source python library for gpu- accelerated and differentiable simulation of quantum sys- tems (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. Van- derPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, JAX: com- posable transformations of Python+NumPy programs (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, in3rd International Conference on Learn- ing Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings, edited by Y. Bengio and Y. LeCun (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    Babuschkin, K

    DeepMind, I. Babuschkin, K. Baumli, A. Bell, S. Bhu- patiraju, J. Bruce, P. Buchlovsky, D. Budden, T. Cai, A. Clark, I. Danihelka, A. Dedieu, C. Fantacci, J. God- win, C. Jones, R. Hemsley, T. Hennigan, M. Hes- sel, S. Hou, S. Kapturowski, T. Keck, I. Kemaev, M. King, M. Kunesch, L. Martens, H. Merzic, V. Miku- lik, T. Norman, G. Papamakarios, J. Quan, R....

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    D. T. McClure, H. Paik, L. S. Bishop, M. Steffen, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Rapid driven reset of a qubit readout resonator, Phys. Rev. Appl.5, 011001 (2016). 24

    work page 2016