pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.17493 · v4 · submitted 2026-03-18 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

DustNET: enabling machine learning and AI models of dusty plasmas

Zhehui Wang , Justin C. Burton , Niklas Dormagen , Cheng-Ran Du , Yan Feng , John E. Foster , Susan S. Glenn , Max Klein
show 25 more authors
Christina A. Knapek Lorin Matthews Andr\'e Melzer Edward Thomas Chuji Wang Jalaan Avritte Shan Chang Neeraj Chaubey Pubuduni Ekanayaka John A. Goree Truell Hyde Chen Liang Zhuang Liu Zhuang Ma Ilya Nemenman Elon Price A. S. Schmitz Mike Schwarz Saikat C. Thakur M. H. Thoma Hubertus M. Thomas L. Wimmer Wei Yang Zimu Yang Xiaoman Zhang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 08:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords dusty plasmasmachine learningDustNETAI modelsplasma physicspredictive modelingcommunity datasetmulti-scale analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

A community-driven dataset called DustNET trains machine learning models to predict dusty plasma behavior where traditional physics models fall short due to cost and incomplete knowledge.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes DustNET, a large-scale community dataset modeled on ImageNet, to support machine learning and AI for dusty plasma research. Dusty plasmas appear across laboratory, industrial, space, and astrophysical settings, yet conventional models based on coupled differential equations remain limited by computational expense, numerical issues, and missing boundary details. By combining experimental, simulation, and synthetic data, DustNET aims to enable data-driven predictions, uncertainty estimates, and multi-scale analysis that complement existing physics approaches. These models could run in real time on edge devices and integrate with broader AI systems to move toward a unified description of dusty plasma phenomena.

Core claim

Dust Neural nEtworks Technology (DustNET) is a community-driven dataset initiative that integrates experimental, simulation, and synthetic data to train machine learning models for predictive modeling, uncertainty quantification, and multi-scale analysis of dusty plasmas, providing a pathway to unified understanding when combined with multi-modal AI foundation models and autonomous agents.

What carries the argument

DustNET, a community-driven dataset that pools experimental, simulation, and synthetic sources to enable bottom-up data-driven ML methods for phenomena such as dust charging, transport, waves, and self-organization.

Load-bearing premise

A sufficiently large, diverse, and well-curated community-driven dataset can be assembled and that ML models trained on it will deliver fully predictive capabilities where conventional coupled differential equations currently fail due to computational cost and incomplete knowledge.

What would settle it

A controlled dusty plasma experiment or simulation with known outcomes where models trained on DustNET show no accuracy improvement over solutions of the standard coupled differential equations for dust charging or transport.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.17493 by Andr\'e Melzer, A. S. Schmitz, Cheng-Ran Du, Chen Liang, Christina A. Knapek, Chuji Wang, Edward Thomas, Elon Price, Hubertus M. Thomas, Ilya Nemenman, Jalaan Avritte, John A. Goree, John E. Foster, Justin C. Burton, Lorin Matthews, L. Wimmer, Max Klein, M. H. Thoma, Mike Schwarz, Neeraj Chaubey, Niklas Dormagen, Pubuduni Ekanayaka, Saikat C. Thakur, Shan Chang, Susan S. Glenn, Truell Hyde, Wei Yang, Xiaoman Zhang, Yan Feng, Zhehui Wang, Zhuang Liu, Zhuang Ma, Zimu Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows images of a single particle trapped in three different plasmas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: body-type forces (∝ r 3 d ∼ Vd, an example is gravity), surface-type forces (∝ r 2 d ∼ Sd, examples in￾clude neutral drag force, ion drag force, and laser pres￾sure force) or size-type forces (∝ rd ∼ ld, an example is electric force) [78, 92]. New classes of effective forces, with a size-scaling of r γ d and the exponent γ being a non￾integer, may also arise. Examples may include dipole￾dipole interaction… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: where 100 images recorded at 12.5 frames/second have been combined to reveal the square-like spatial pat￾tern of the movement of the dust particles. FIG. 15. Photograph of imposed ordering in a dusty plasma at high magnetic field. The image in generated by extracting the maximum pixel intensity from a sequence of 100 images recorded at 12.5 frames/second. This experiment was per￾formed at a magnetic field… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: , is the use of a new xiQ camera, which offers higher resolution and increased frame rates. The exper￾imental setup is designed to study complex plasmas in a direct current (DC) discharge within an elongated, U￾shaped glass tube filled with either neon or argon. A flow controller regulates the gas flow at one end, while a vacuum pump at the other maintains the desired pres￾sure level [315]. Electrodes at … view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: shows the sequence of jet droplet ejection events from the liquid anode recorded by a high-speed camera at 27 kfps. The experimental setup is detailed in [343]. Compared to Taylor cone droplets from the liquid cath￾ode, the amount of aerosol generated at the liquid an￾ode largely depends on the dissolved gas source, and the droplet average velocity is relatively independent of the local electric field. St… view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_27.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: FIG. 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_28.png] view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: FIG. 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: FIG. 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_30.png] view at source ↗
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: FIG. 31 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_31.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: FIG. 32 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_32.png] view at source ↗
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: FIG. 33 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_33.png] view at source ↗
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: FIG. 34 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_34.png] view at source ↗
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: FIG. 35 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_35.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dusty plasmas are ubiquitous throughout the universe, spanning laboratory and industrial plasmas, fusion devices, planetary environments, cometary comae, and interstellar media. Despite decades of research, many aspects of their behavior remain poorly understood within a unified framework. While numerous theoretical and numerical models describe specific phenomena, such as dust charging, transport, waves, and self-organization, fully predictive models across the wide range of spatial and temporal scales in both laboratory and natural systems remain elusive. Conventional plasma descriptions rely on coupled differential equations for particle densities, momenta, and energies, but their solutions are often limited by computational cost, numerical uncertainties, and incomplete knowledge of boundary conditions and transport processes. Recent advances in machine learning (ML), particularly deep neural networks, offer new opportunities to complement traditional physics-based modeling. Here we review ML and artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, termed bottom-up data-driven methods, for dusty plasma research. Central to this effort is Dust Neural nEtworks Technology (DustNET), a community-driven dataset initiative inspired by ImageNet, integrating experimental, simulation, and synthetic data to enable predictive modeling, uncertainty quantification, and multi-scale analysis. DustNET-trained models may also be deployed in real-time experimental settings under edge computing constraints. Combined with emerging multi-modal AI foundation models and autonomous agents, this framework provides a pathway toward a unified, physics-informed understanding of dusty plasmas across laboratory, industrial, space, and astrophysical environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews limitations of conventional physics-based models for dusty plasmas (computational cost, incomplete boundary conditions, lack of unified multi-scale predictions) and proposes DustNET, a community-driven dataset initiative modeled on ImageNet, to enable ML/AI models for predictive modeling, uncertainty quantification, real-time edge deployment, and a pathway to unified physics-informed understanding when combined with multi-modal foundation models and autonomous agents.

Significance. If realized, the DustNET framework could meaningfully advance dusty plasma research by providing data-driven complements to differential-equation models where computational scaling and incomplete physics currently limit predictivity across laboratory, fusion, space, and astrophysical regimes. The proposal correctly identifies an emerging opportunity at the intersection of plasma physics and modern AI, though its significance remains prospective pending dataset construction and validation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that DustNET 'provides a pathway toward a unified, physics-informed understanding' rests on the unelaborated assumption that a sufficiently large, diverse, and well-curated community dataset can be assembled; no discussion of data standards, labeling protocols, integration of experimental/simulation/synthetic sources, or bias mitigation is supplied, leaving the viability of the pathway unaddressed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the acronym expansion 'Dust Neural nEtworks Technology' uses inconsistent capitalization ('nEtworks'); adopt standard title-case or clarify the intended acronym formation for readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive assessment of our manuscript and the recognition of DustNET's potential significance. We address the major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation of the proposal.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that DustNET 'provides a pathway toward a unified, physics-informed understanding' rests on the unelaborated assumption that a sufficiently large, diverse, and well-curated community dataset can be assembled; no discussion of data standards, labeling protocols, integration of experimental/simulation/synthetic sources, or bias mitigation is supplied, leaving the viability of the pathway unaddressed.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's forward-looking claim would benefit from greater elaboration on the practical requirements for realizing DustNET. The manuscript is structured as a vision paper that identifies the opportunity for data-driven methods in dusty plasma research and proposes DustNET as a community initiative modeled on successful precedents such as ImageNet. In the revised manuscript we will (i) qualify the abstract language to emphasize that the pathway is prospective and contingent on community participation, and (ii) add a new subsection outlining initial considerations for data standards (adoption of FAIR principles and common metadata schemas for dust charge, size, and velocity), labeling protocols (consistent annotation of experimental, PIC-simulation, and synthetic-image sources), multi-source integration strategies, and bias-mitigation approaches (diverse regime sampling and uncertainty-aware curation). These additions will clarify the viability discussion without altering the paper's primary focus on motivation and opportunity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is a review and forward-looking proposal paper that summarizes known limitations of conventional plasma models and outlines an aspirational community dataset initiative (DustNET) modeled on ImageNet. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or empirical predictions are presented anywhere in the text. All central claims are framed as pathways or future opportunities rather than completed results that could reduce to self-definitions, self-citations, or fitted inputs. The argument rests on external needs for data curation and model training, with no load-bearing steps that collapse by construction to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal rests on the domain assumption that data-driven models can usefully complement incomplete physics-based descriptions, with DustNET introduced as the key new entity without independent evidence of its feasibility or performance.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Machine learning models can overcome computational cost and incomplete boundary knowledge in traditional plasma differential equations
    Invoked in the abstract when stating that recent ML advances offer new opportunities to complement conventional descriptions.
invented entities (1)
  • DustNET no independent evidence
    purpose: Community-driven dataset integrating experimental, simulation, and synthetic data to enable predictive ML modeling and uncertainty quantification for dusty plasmas
    Introduced as the central element of the effort; no external validation or existing dataset is referenced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5700 in / 1378 out tokens · 66491 ms · 2026-05-15T08:56:19.623566+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dark matter and dark energy,

    V. Sahni, “Dark matter and dark energy,” in Lect. Notes Phys.: The physics of the Early Universe , Vol. 653, edited by E. Papantonopoulos (Springer, 2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    D. A. Mendis and M. Rosenberg, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 32, 419 (1994)

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    The warm, cold and very cold dusty universe,

    A. Li, “The warm, cold and very cold dusty universe,” in Penetrating bars through masks of cosmic dust , edited by D. L. Block, I. Puerari, K. C. Freeman, R. Groess, and E. K. Block (Springer, 2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Gail and E

    H.-P. Gail and E. Sedlmayr, Physics and Chemistry of Circumstellar Dust Shells (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    V. E. Fortov and G. E. Morfill (eds.), Complex and Dusty Plasmas: From Laboratory to Space (CRC Press, 2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Bouchoule (ed.), Dusty Plasma: Physics, Chemistry and Technological Impacts in Plasma Processing (Wiley, 1999)

    A. Bouchoule (ed.), Dusty Plasma: Physics, Chemistry and Technological Impacts in Plasma Processing (Wiley, 1999)

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    Merlino, Advances in Physics: X 6, 1873859 (2021)

    R. Merlino, Advances in Physics: X 6, 1873859 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Z. Wang, J. Xu, Y. E. Kovach, B. T. Wolfe, E. Thomas, H. Guo, J. E. Foster, and H.- W. Shen, Physics of Plasmas 27, 033703 (2020) , https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5134787

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5134787 2020

  9. [9]

    Khawaja, F

    N. Khawaja, F. Klenner, J. Szalay, M. Kobayashi, C. Briois, and I. Mann, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 382, 20230210 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    H. Wang, T. Fu, Y. Du, W. Gao, K. Huang, Z. Liu, P. Chandak, S. Liu, P. Van Katwyk, A. Deac, A. Anandkumar, K. Bergen, C. P. Gomes, S. Ho, P. Kohli, J. Lasenby, J. Leskovec, T.-Y. Liu, A. Man- rai, D. Marks, B. Ramsundar, L. Song, J. Sun, J. Tang, P. Veličković, M. Welling, L. Zhang, C. W. Coley, Y. Bengio, and M. Zitnik, Nature 620, 47 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Knecht, K

    V. Knecht, K. H. Scheutwinkel, A. D. Fernández, B. Jo- hes, M. Campanelli, C. Fang, J. G. Lozano, M. Agrawal, D. Grün, and Y. H. He, AI for Physics (CRC Press, 2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Imagenet,

    “Imagenet,” https://www.image-net.org/index.php (2025), accessed: 2025-03-30

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei- Fei, in 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2009) pp. 248–255

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    Shorten and T

    C. Shorten and T. M. Khoshgoftaar, J. Big Data 6, 60 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Chlap, H

    P. Chlap, H. Min, N. Vandenberg, J. Dowling, L. Hol- loway, and A. Haworth, J. Med. Imag. Rad. Oncology 65, 545 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Goodfellow, J

    I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, Communications of the ACM 63, 139 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    M. W. Diederik P Kingma, arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 (2013)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffu- sion probabilistic models,” (2020), arXiv:2006.11239 [cs.LG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents

    A. Ramesh, P. Dhariwal, A. Nichol, C. Chu, and M. Chen, “Hierarchical text-conditional image gen- eration with clip latents,” (2022), arXiv:2204.06125 [cs.CV]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Brain imaging generation with latent diffusion models,

    W. H. L. Pinaya, P.-D. Tudosiu, J. Dafflon, P. F. da Costa, V. Fernandez, P. Nachev, S. Ourselin, and M. J. Cardoso, “Brain imaging generation with latent diffusion models,” (2022), arXiv:2209.07162 [eess.IV]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Raissi, P

    M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. Karniadakis, Journal of Computational Physics 378, 686 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Physics-guided, physics-informed, and physics-encoded neural networks in sci- entificcomputing

    S. A. Faroughi, N. Pawar, C. Fernandes, M. Raissi, S. Das, N. K. Kalantari, and S. K. Mahjour, “Physics- guided, physics-informed, and physics-encoded neu- ral networks in scientific computing,” (2023), arXiv:2211.07377 [cs.LG]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Kovachki, Z

    N. Kovachki, Z. Li, B. Liu, K. Azizzadenesheli, K. Bhat- tacharya, A. Stuart, and A. Anandkumar, Journal of Machine Learning Research 24, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    H. W. Lin, M. Tegmark, and D. Rolnick, Journal of 51 Statistical Physics 168, 1223–1247 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Attention Is All You Need

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” (2023), arXiv:1706.03762 [cs.CL]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    M. L. Cohen, Physics Today 59, 48 (2006)

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Physics-informed meta-instrument for exper- iments (pimix) with applications to fusion energy,

    Z. Wang, S. Lin, M. Teng-Levy, P. Chu, B. T. Wolfe, C.- S. Wong, C. S. Campbell, X. Yue, L. Zhang, D. Aberle, M. A. Alvarez, D. Broughton, R. T. Chen, B. Cheng, F. Chu, E. R. Fossum, M. A. Foster, C. Huang, V. Kilic, K. Krushelnick, W. Li, E. Loomis, T. S. Jr., S. K. Sjue, C. Tomkins, D. A. Yarotski, and R. Zhu, “Physics-informed meta-instrument for exper...

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    S¨ uzen, Supplement and dataset for bootstrapped time-integrated spread complexity, 10.5281/zen- odo.19707590 (2026)

    D. Ha and J. Schmidhuber, (2018), 10.5281/ZEN- ODO.1207631

    work page doi:10.5281/zen- 2018

  29. [29]

    Beckers, J

    J. Beckers, J. Berndt, D. Block, M. Bonitz, P. J. Bruggeman, L. Couëdel, G. L. Delzanno, Y. Feng, R. Gopalakrishnan, F. Greiner, P. Hartmann, M. Horányi, H. Kersten, C. A. Knapek, U. Konopka, U. Kortshagen, E. G. Kostadinova, E. Kovačević, S. I. Krasheninnikov, I. Mann, D. Mariotti, L. S. Matthews, A. Melzer, M. Mikikian, V. Nosenko, M. Y. Pustylnik, S. R...

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Boufendi and A

    L. Boufendi and A. Bouchoule, Plasma Sources Science and Technology 3, 262 (1994)

    work page 1994

  31. [31]

    Winter, Plasma Phys

    J. Winter, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 46, B583 (2004)

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    Ticoş, A

    D. Ticoş, A. Scurtu, J. D. Williams, L. Scott, E. Thomas, D. Sanford, and C. M. Ticoş, Phys. Rev. E 103, 023210 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Z. Guo, C. Li, Y. Li, Y. Wen, K. Tai, X. Li, J. Liu, and Z. Ouyang, Geophys- ical Research Letters 49, e2021GL097323 (2022), e2021GL097323 2021GL097323, https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2021GL097323

    work page doi:10.1029/2021gl097323 2022

  34. [34]

    Horányi, T

    M. Horányi, T. W. Hartquist, O. Havnes, D. A. Mendis, and G. E. Morfill, Reviews of Geophysics 42, RG4002 (2004)

    work page 2004

  35. [35]

    Wahlund, M

    J.-E. Wahlund, M. André, A. Eriksson, M. Lundberg, M. Morooka, M. Shafiq, T. A verkamp, D. Gurnett, G. Hospodarsky, W. Kurth, K. Jacobsen, A. Pedersen, W. Farrell, S. Ratynskaia, and N. Piskunov, Planetary and Space Science 57, 1795 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Layers of interstellar dust, gas,

    “Layers of interstellar dust, gas,” https: //science.nasa.gov/missions/webb/nasas-webb- reveals-intricate-layers-of-interstellar-dust- gas/ (2025), accessed: 2025-04-06

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale

    A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weis- senborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, J. Uszkoreit, and N. Houlsby, arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929 (2021)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    S. L. Girshick, Nucleation of Particles from the Gas Phase (Cambridge University Press, 2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    G. S. Selwyn, J. E. Heidenreich, and K. L. Haller, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 9, 2817 (1991) , https://pubs.aip.org/avs/jva/article- pdf/9/5/2817/11676522/2817_1_online.pdf

    work page 1991

  40. [40]

    K. J. Kanarik, W. T. Osowiecki, Y. J. Lu, D. Talukder, N. Roschewsky, S. N. Park, M. Kamon, D. M. Fried, and R. A. Gottscho, Nature 616, 707 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Ratynskaia, A

    S. Ratynskaia, A. Bortolon, and S. I. Krasheninnikov, Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 6, 20 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    J. M. C. Plane, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 6507 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Messenger, Nature 404, 968 (2000)

    S. Messenger, Nature 404, 968 (2000)

    work page 2000

  44. [44]

    P. R. Heck, J. Greer, L. Kööp, R. Trappitsch, F. Gyngard, H. Busemann, C. Maden, J. N. Á vila, A. M. Davis, and R. Wieler, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 1884 (2020) , https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1904573117

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1904573117 2020

  45. [45]

    Hoppe, J

    P. Hoppe, J. Leitner, J. Kodolányi, S. Borrmann, and A. P. Jones, Nature Astronomy 6, 1027 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    V. N. Tsytovich, Phys. Uspekhi 40, 53 (1997)

    work page 1997

  47. [47]

    K. G. Emeleus and A. Breslin, Int. J. Electron. 29, 1 (1970)

    work page 1970

  48. [48]

    Homann, A

    A. Homann, A. Melzer, and A. Piel, Phys. Rev. E 59, 7138 (1999)

    work page 1999

  49. [49]

    E. B. Tomme, B. M. Annaratone, and J. E. Allen, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 9, 87 (2000)

    work page 2000

  50. [50]

    A. V. Ivlev, R. Sutterlin, V. Steinberg, M. Zuzic, and G. Morfill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4060 (2000)

    work page 2000

  51. [51]

    Couëdel, V

    L. Couëdel, V. Nosenko, M. R. Zuzic, S. Zhdanov, Y. Elskens, T. Hall, and A. V. Ivlev, Phys. Rev. E 97, 043206 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Chaubey, J

    N. Chaubey, J. Goree, S. J. Lanham, and M. J. Kush- ner, Phys. Plasmas 28, 103702 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Schneider and H

    V. Schneider and H. Kersten, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 103505 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Schleitzer, V

    J. Schleitzer, V. Schneider, and H. Kersten, Phys. Plas- mas 28, 083506 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Ekanayaka, C

    P. Ekanayaka, C. Wang, S. C. Thakur, and E. Thomas, Physics of Plasmas 31, 031601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Ashkin, Biophys

    A. Ashkin, Biophys. J. 61, 569 (1992)

    work page 1992

  57. [57]

    Rohatschek, J

    H. Rohatschek, J. Aerosol Sci. 26, 717 (1995)

    work page 1995

  58. [58]

    Ashkin, Phys

    A. Ashkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 156 (1970)

    work page 1970

  59. [59]

    Z. Gong, Y. L. Pan, G. Videen, and C. Wang, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 214, 94 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    C. Wang, Y. L. Pan, and G. Videen, Measure. Sci. Technol. 32, 102005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    J. E. Thomas, R. L. Merlino, and M. Rosenberg, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54, 124034 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    Ekanayaka, C

    P. Ekanayaka, C. Wang, S. C. Thakur, and E. Thomas, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 34, 105023 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Schleede, L

    J. Schleede, L. Lewerentz, F. X. Bronold, R. Schneider, and H. Fehske, Phys. Plasmas 25, 043702 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    J. H. Chu and Lin I, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4009 (1994)

    work page 1994

  65. [65]

    Hayashi and K

    Y. Hayashi and K. Tachibana, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, L804 (1994)

    work page 1994

  66. [66]

    Thomas, G

    H. Thomas, G. E. Morfill, D. V., J. Goree, B. Feuer- bacher, and M. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 652 (1994)

    work page 1994

  67. [67]

    Ikezi, Phys

    H. Ikezi, Phys. Fluids 29, 1764 (1986)

    work page 1986

  68. [68]

    H. M. Thomas and G. E. Morfill, Nature 379, 806 (1996)

    work page 1996

  69. [69]

    Juan, C.-H

    Lin I, W.-T. Juan, C.-H. Chiang, and J. H. Chu, Science 272, 1626 (1996)

    work page 1996

  70. [70]

    K. R. Sütterlin, A. Wysocki, A. V. Ivlev, C. Räth, H. M. Thomas, M. Rubin-Zuzic, W. J. Goedheer, V. E. For- tov, A. M. Lipaev, V. I. Molotkov, O. F. Petrov, G. E. Morfill, and H. Löwen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 085003 (2009)

    work page 2009

  71. [71]

    Jiang and C.-R

    K. Jiang and C.-R. Du, Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 6, 23 (2022)

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    Chai and P

    K.-B. Chai and P. M. Bellan, Phys. Plasmas 23, 023701 (2016)

    work page 2016

  73. [73]

    Scurtu, D

    A. Scurtu, D. Ticos, M. Mitu, N. Udrea, and C. Ticos, 52 Crystals 13, 76 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    H. M. Thomas, G. E. Morfill, V. E. Fortov, A. V. Ivlev, V. I. Molotkov, A. M. Lipaev, T. Hagl, H. Rothermel, S. A. Khrapak, R. K. Suetterlin, M. Rubin-Zuzic, O. F. Petrov, V. I. Tokarev, and S. K. Krikalev, New Journal of Physics 10, 033036 (2008)

    work page 2008

  75. [75]

    M. H. Thoma, H. M. Thomas, C. A. Knapek, A. Melzer, and U. Konopka, npj Microgravity 9, 13 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    A. V. Ivlev, J. Bartnick, M. Heinen, C.-R. Du, V. Nosenko, and H. Löwen, Physical Review X 5, 011035 (2015)

    work page 2015

  77. [77]

    M. Y. Pustylnik, M. A. Fink, V. Nosenko, T. Antonova, T. Hagl, H. M. Thomas, A. V. Zobnin, A. M. Li- paev, A. D. Usachev, V. I. Molotkov, O. F. Petrov, V. E. Fortov, C. Rau, C. Deysenroth, S. Albrecht, M. Kretschmer, M. H. Thoma, G. E. Morfill, R. Seurig, A. Stettner, V. A. Alyamovskaya, A. Orr, E. Kufner, E. G. Lavrenko, G. I. Padalka, E. O. Serova, A. M...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4962696 2016

  78. [78]

    Fortov, A

    V. Fortov, A. Ivlev, S. Khrapak, A. Khrapak, and G. Morfill, Phys. Rep. 421, 1 (2005)

    work page 2005

  79. [79]

    Chaudhuri, A

    M. Chaudhuri, A. V. Ivlev, S. A. Khrapak, H. M. Thomas, and G. E. Morfill, Soft Matter 7, 1287 (2011)

    work page 2011

  80. [80]

    Schwabe, S

    M. Schwabe, S. Zhdanov, T. Hagl, P. Huber, A. M. Lipaev, V. I. Molotkov, V. N. Naumkin, M. Rubin- Zuzic, P. V. Vinogradov, E. Zaehringer, V. E. Fortov, and H. M. Thomas, New Journal of Physics 19, 103019 (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.