pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.21459 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-23 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Symmetries of non-maximal supergravities with higher-derivative corrections

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 01:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP
keywords higher-derivative correctionshidden symmetriesU-dualitysupergravitydimensional reductionsymmetry breakingG2(2)O(d+p+1,d+1)
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher-derivative corrections explicitly break all hidden symmetry enhancements in non-maximal supergravities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies hidden symmetries that emerge from U-duality when non-maximal supergravities with higher-derivative corrections are reduced to three dimensions. It examines the G_{2(2)} symmetry of minimal five-dimensional supergravity and the O(d+p+1,d+1) symmetry of bosonic and heterotic string theory compactified on a torus. A group theory argument establishes that the higher-derivative terms transform in representations incompatible with preserving these symmetries. Consequently, the corrections prevent any enhancement of the lower-dimensional symmetry groups. This result applies directly to cases such as pure five-dimensional gravity, where SL(3,R) enhancement is blocked, and the STU model, where O(4,4) enhancement is blocked.

Core claim

Using a group theory argument, we show that the higher-derivative corrections explicitly break all hidden symmetry enhancements. In particular, this holds for the G_{2(2)} symmetry of minimal five-dimensional supergravity and the O(d+p+1,d+1) symmetry of bosonic and heterotic string theory on T^d. As special cases, higher-derivative corrections prevent the symmetry enhancement to SL(3,R) in pure five-dimensional gravity and to O(4,4) in the STU model.

What carries the argument

A group theory argument based on the representations under which the higher-derivative corrections transform, demonstrating incompatibility with the hidden symmetry groups.

If this is right

  • Hidden symmetries from U-duality are broken in all considered reductions to three dimensions.
  • Symmetry enhancement to SL(3,R) does not occur in pure five-dimensional gravity once higher-derivative corrections are included.
  • Symmetry enhancement to O(4,4) does not occur in the STU model with higher-derivative corrections.
  • The breaking applies uniformly to both bosonic and heterotic string theory compactifications on tori.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Effective field theories derived from string compactifications will lack these enhanced symmetries at higher orders in the derivative expansion.
  • Black hole solutions and duality orbits in three-dimensional reductions may need reclassification when higher-derivative terms are present.
  • Similar representation-based breaking arguments could apply to other higher-derivative corrections or different dimensional reductions.

Load-bearing premise

Higher-derivative corrections transform in representations that do not preserve the hidden symmetries, and no additional terms exist that could restore those symmetries.

What would settle it

An explicit higher-derivative term that remains invariant under the full hidden symmetry group (such as G_{2(2)} or O(d+p+1,d+1)) would falsify the breaking claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.21459 by Robert J. Saskowski, Yi Pang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Dynkin diagram of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Root system of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider hidden symmetries arising from U-duality in the dimensional reduction of non-maximal higher-derivative supergravities to three dimensions. In particular, we consider the $G_{2(2)}$ symmetry of minimal five-dimensional supergravity and the $O(d+p+1,d+1)$ symmetry of bosonic and heterotic string theory on $T^d$. Using a group theory argument, we show that the higher-derivative corrections explicitly break all hidden symmetry enhancements. As special cases, this also implies that higher-derivative corrections prevent the symmetry enhancement to $SL(3,\mathbb R)$ in pure five-dimensional gravity and $O(4,4)$ in the STU model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper examines hidden symmetries from U-duality in the dimensional reduction of non-maximal higher-derivative supergravities to three dimensions. It focuses on the G_{2(2)} symmetry of minimal five-dimensional supergravity and the O(d+p+1,d+1) symmetry of bosonic and heterotic string theory compactified on T^d. Using a group theory argument, the authors show that higher-derivative corrections explicitly break these hidden symmetry enhancements, with implications for special cases including the absence of SL(3,R) enhancement in pure five-dimensional gravity and O(4,4) in the STU model.

Significance. If the group theory argument holds, the result is significant for clarifying the structure of effective actions in string theory and supergravity. It demonstrates that higher-derivative terms generically obstruct symmetry enhancements that appear in the two-derivative sector, providing a representation-theoretic obstruction that applies across multiple non-maximal theories. This has potential implications for the consistency of duality-invariant higher-derivative corrections and for the analysis of black-hole solutions or scattering processes where such symmetries are often assumed.

major comments (1)
  1. The central group-theory claim (that higher-derivative corrections transform in representations containing no singlets under G_{2(2)} and O(d+p+1,d+1)) is load-bearing for the entire conclusion. The manuscript should supply an explicit decomposition of the leading higher-derivative operators (e.g., the four-derivative terms in the 5D minimal supergravity case) under these groups to confirm the absence of invariants, rather than relying solely on the abstract representation-theoretic statement.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the symmetry groups (G_{2(2)}, O(d+p+1,d+1)) and the precise definition of the higher-derivative Lagrangian terms should be introduced with a short table or list of representations in the introductory section for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive suggestion regarding the presentation of the group-theoretic argument.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central group-theory claim (that higher-derivative corrections transform in representations containing no singlets under G_{2(2)} and O(d+p+1,d+1)) is load-bearing for the entire conclusion. The manuscript should supply an explicit decomposition of the leading higher-derivative operators (e.g., the four-derivative terms in the 5D minimal supergravity case) under these groups to confirm the absence of invariants, rather than relying solely on the abstract representation-theoretic statement.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit decomposition of the leading higher-derivative operators would make the argument more concrete and easier to verify. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection that performs the explicit branching of the four-derivative terms (including the relevant curvature-squared and Chern-Simons-like operators) under G_{2(2)} for minimal five-dimensional supergravity, confirming the absence of singlets. Where the representation theory permits, we will also supply analogous explicit decompositions for the O(d+p+1,d+1) cases to illustrate the general obstruction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: group-theory representation argument is self-contained

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on a direct group-theory analysis of how higher-derivative corrections transform under the relevant hidden symmetry groups (G_{2(2)}, O(d+p+1,d+1), SL(3,R), O(4,4)). The argument proceeds by identifying the representation content of the corrections and showing the absence of singlets, which is a standard, externally verifiable computation in representation theory of Lie groups. No step reduces to a fitted parameter, self-referential definition, or load-bearing self-citation whose validity depends on the present work. The derivation is therefore independent of its own outputs and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about the form of higher-derivative corrections in supergravity and the representation theory of the relevant groups; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Higher-derivative corrections transform in representations that do not preserve the hidden symmetries of the reduced theory
    Invoked in the group theory argument to conclude explicit breaking.
  • domain assumption Standard setup of non-maximal supergravities and their dimensional reductions to three dimensions
    Background for identifying the G_{2(2)} and O(d+p+1,d+1) symmetries.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5417 in / 1295 out tokens · 61497 ms · 2026-05-15T01:26:12.202786+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 55 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Ehlers, Transformations of static exterior solutions of Einstein’s gravitational field equations into different solutions by means of conformal mapping, Colloq

    J. Ehlers, Transformations of static exterior solutions of Einstein’s gravitational field equations into different solutions by means of conformal mapping, Colloq. Int. CNRS91, 275 (1962)

  2. [2]

    Maison, EHLERS-HARRISON TYPE TRANSFORMATIONS FOR JORDAN’S EX- TENDED THEORY OF GRAVITATION, Gen

    D. Maison, EHLERS-HARRISON TYPE TRANSFORMATIONS FOR JORDAN’S EX- TENDED THEORY OF GRAVITATION, Gen. Rel. Grav.10, 717 (1979)

  3. [3]

    Maison, Duality and hidden symmetries in gravitational theories, Lect

    D. Maison, Duality and hidden symmetries in gravitational theories, Lect. Notes Phys.540, 273 (2000)

  4. [4]

    Noncompact Symmetries in String Theory

    J. Maharana and J. H. Schwarz, Noncompact symmetries in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B390, 3 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9207016

  5. [5]

    Strong-Weak Coupling Duality in Four Dimensional String Theory

    A. Sen, Strong - weak coupling duality in four-dimensional string theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9, 3707 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9402002

  6. [6]

    Strong-Weak Coupling Duality in Three Dimensional String Theory

    A. Sen, Strong - weak coupling duality in three-dimensional string theory, Nucl. Phys. B434, 179 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9408083

  7. [7]

    Dualisation of Dualities, I

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, Dualization of dualities. 1., Nucl. Phys. B523, 73 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9710119

  8. [8]

    Dualisation of Dualities, II: Twisted self-duality of doubled fields and superdualities

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, Dualization of dualities. 2. Twisted self-duality of doubled fields, and superdualities, Nucl. Phys. B535, 242 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9806106

  9. [9]

    Cecotti, S

    S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara, and L. Girardello, Geometry of Type II Superstrings and the Moduli of Superconformal Field Theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4, 2475 (1989). 23

  10. [10]

    More on the Similarity between D=5 Simple Supergravity and M Theory

    S. Mizoguchi and N. Ohta, More on the similarity between D = 5 simple supergravity and M theory, Phys. Lett. B441, 123 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9807111

  11. [11]

    Higher-dimensional Origin of D=3 Coset Symmetries

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, Higher dimensional origin of D = 3 coset symmetries, arXiv:hep-th/9909099 (1999)

  12. [12]

    Z. W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, Charged rotating black holes in four- dimensional gauged and ungauged supergravities, Nucl. Phys. B717, 246 (2005), arXiv:hep- th/0411045

  13. [13]

    D. V. Gal’tsov and N. G. Scherbluk, Generating technique for U(1)**3 5D supergravity, Phys. Rev. D78, 064033 (2008), arXiv:0805.3924 [hep-th]

  14. [14]

    D. V. Gal’tsov and N. G. Scherbluk, Improved generating technique for D=5 supergravities and squashed Kaluza-Klein Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D79, 064020 (2009), arXiv:0812.2336 [hep-th]

  15. [15]

    Veneziano, Scale factor duality for classical and quantum strings, Phys

    G. Veneziano, Scale factor duality for classical and quantum strings, Phys. Lett. B265, 287 (1991)

  16. [16]

    K. A. Meissner and G. Veneziano, Symmetries of cosmological superstring vacua, Phys. Lett. B267, 33 (1991)

  17. [17]

    Sen, O(d) x O(d) symmetry of the space of cosmological solutions in string theory, scale factor duality and two-dimensional black holes, Phys

    A. Sen, O(d) x O(d) symmetry of the space of cosmological solutions in string theory, scale factor duality and two-dimensional black holes, Phys. Lett. B271, 295 (1991)

  18. [18]

    Twisted Black p-Brane Solutions in String Theory

    A. Sen, Twisted black p-brane solutions in string theory, Phys. Lett. B274, 34 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9108011

  19. [19]

    Gasperini, J

    M. Gasperini, J. Maharana, and G. Veneziano, From trivial to nontrivial conformal string backgrounds via O(d,d) transformations, Phys. Lett. B272, 277 (1991)

  20. [20]

    S. F. Hassan and A. Sen, Twisting classical solutions in heterotic string theory, Nucl. Phys. B375, 103 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9109038

  21. [21]

    Rotating Charged Black Hole Solution in Heterotic String Theory

    A. Sen, Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1006 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9204046

  22. [22]

    All the Four Dimensional Static, Spherically Symmetric Solutions of Abelian Kaluza-Klein Theory

    M. Cvetic and D. Youm, All the four-dimensional static, spherically symmetric solutions of Abelian Kaluza-Klein theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4165 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9503082

  23. [23]

    General Static Spherically Symmetric Black Holes of Heterotic String on a Six Torus

    M. Cvetic and D. Youm, All the static spherically symmetric black holes of heterotic string on a six torus, Nucl. Phys. B472, 249 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9512127

  24. [24]

    General Rotating Five Dimensional Black Holes of Toroidally Compactified Heterotic String

    M. Cvetic and D. Youm, General rotating five-dimensional black holes of toroidally compact- 24 ified heterotic string, Nucl. Phys. B476, 118 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9603100

  25. [25]

    $G_2$ generating technique for minimal D=5 supergravity and black rings

    A. Bouchareb, G. Clement, C.-M. Chen, D. V. Gal’tsov, N. G. Scherbluk, and T. Wolf, G(2) generating technique for minimal D=5 supergravity and black rings, Phys. Rev. D76, 104032 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 78, 029901 (2008)], arXiv:0708.2361 [hep-th]

  26. [26]

    Charged Rotating Kaluza-Klein Black Holes Generated by G2(2) Transformation

    S. Tomizawa, Y. Yasui, and Y. Morisawa, Charged Rotating Kaluza-Klein Black Holes Gen- erated by G2(2) Transformation, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 145006 (2009), arXiv:0809.2001 [hep-th]

  27. [27]

    G2 Dualities in D=5 Supergravity and Black Strings

    G. Compere, S. de Buyl, E. Jamsin, and A. Virmani,G 2 Dualities inD= 5 Supergravity and Black Strings, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 125016 (2009), arXiv:0903.1645 [hep-th]

  28. [28]

    Suzuki and S

    R. Suzuki and S. Tomizawa, New construction of a charged dipole black ring by the Harrison transformation, Phys. Rev. D109, 084020 (2024), arXiv:2402.07589 [hep-th]

  29. [29]

    Suzuki and S

    R. Suzuki and S. Tomizawa, Solution generation of a capped black hole, Phys. Rev. D110, 024026 (2024), arXiv:2403.17796 [hep-th]

  30. [30]

    Suzuki and S

    R. Suzuki and S. Tomizawa, New black ring with all independent conserved charges in five- dimensional minimal supergravity, Phys. Rev. D110, 124041 (2024), arXiv:2407.18142 [hep- th]

  31. [31]

    O. Hohm, A. Sen, and B. Zwiebach, Heterotic Effective Action and Duality Symmetries Re- visited, JHEP02, 079, arXiv:1411.5696 [hep-th]

  32. [32]

    P.-J. Hu, L. Ma, Y. Pang, and R. J. Saskowski, Higher-derivative heterotic Kerr-Sen black holes, JHEP02, 235, arXiv:2506.20077 [hep-th]

  33. [33]

    M. Xia, L. Ma, Y. Pang, and R. J. Saskowski, Consistent four-derivative heterotic truncations and the Kerr-Sen solution, Phys. Rev. D113, 046019 (2026), arXiv:2509.07069 [hep-th]

  34. [34]

    C. M. Hull and P. K. Townsend, Unity of superstring dualities, Nucl. Phys. B438, 109 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9410167

  35. [35]

    M. B. Green and M. Gutperle, Effects of D instantons, Nucl. Phys. B498, 195 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9701093

  36. [36]

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, D instantons, strings and M theory, Phys. Lett. B408, 122 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9704145

  37. [37]

    M. B. Green, M. Gutperle, and P. Vanhove, One loop in eleven dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 409, 177 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9706175

  38. [38]

    On $R^4$ threshold corrections in IIB string theory and (p,q) string instantons

    E. Kiritsis and B. Pioline, On R**4 threshold corrections in IIb string theory and (p, q) string 25 instantons, Nucl. Phys. B508, 509 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9707018

  39. [39]

    M. B. Green, M. Gutperle, and H.-h. Kwon, Sixteen fermion and related terms in M theory on T**2, Phys. Lett. B421, 149 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9710151

  40. [40]

    A note on non-perturbative R^4 couplings

    B. Pioline, A Note on nonperturbative R**4 couplings, Phys. Lett. B431, 73 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9804023

  41. [41]

    M. B. Green and S. Sethi, Supersymmetry constraints on type IIB supergravity, Phys. Rev. D59, 046006 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9808061

  42. [42]

    M. B. Green, H.-h. Kwon, and P. Vanhove, Two loops in eleven-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D61, 104010 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9910055

  43. [43]

    N. A. Obers and B. Pioline, Eisenstein series in string theory, Class. Quant. Grav.17, 1215 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9910115

  44. [44]

    Sinha, The G(hat)**4 lambda**16 term in IIB supergravity, JHEP08, 017, arXiv:hep- th/0207070

    A. Sinha, The G(hat)**4 lambda**16 term in IIB supergravity, JHEP08, 017, arXiv:hep- th/0207070

  45. [45]

    Multiloop Amplitudes and Vanishing Theorems using the Pure Spinor Formalism for the Superstring

    N. Berkovits, Multiloop amplitudes and vanishing theorems using the pure spinor formalism for the superstring, JHEP09, 047, arXiv:hep-th/0406055

  46. [46]

    Two-Loop Superstrings VI: Non-Renormalization Theorems and the 4-Point Function

    E. D’Hoker and D. H. Phong, Two-loop superstrings VI: Non-renormalization theorems and the 4-point function, Nucl. Phys. B715, 3 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0501197

  47. [47]

    Two-loop superstrings and S-duality

    E. D’Hoker, M. Gutperle, and D. H. Phong, Two-loop superstrings and S-duality, Nucl. Phys. B722, 81 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0503180

  48. [48]

    Higher genus superstring amplitudes from the geometry of moduli spaces

    M. Matone and R. Volpato, Higher genus superstring amplitudes from the geometry of moduli space, Nucl. Phys. B732, 321 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0506231

  49. [49]

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, Duality and higher derivative terms in M theory, JHEP01, 093, arXiv:hep-th/0510027

  50. [50]

    M. B. Green, J. G. Russo, and P. Vanhove, Non-renormalisation conditions in type II string theory and maximal supergravity, JHEP02, 099, arXiv:hep-th/0610299

  51. [51]

    The D^4 R^4 term in type IIB string theory on T^2 and U-duality

    A. Basu, The D**4 R**4 term in type IIB string theory on T**2 and U-duality, Phys. Rev. D77, 106003 (2008), arXiv:0708.2950 [hep-th]

  52. [52]

    The D^6 R^4 term in type IIB string theory on T^2 and U-duality

    A. Basu, The D**6 R**4 term in type IIB string theory on T**2 and U-duality, Phys. Rev. D77, 106004 (2008), arXiv:0712.1252 [hep-th]

  53. [53]

    M. R. Garousi, S-duality constraint on higher-derivative couplings, JHEP05, 100, arXiv:1310.7377 [hep-th]. 26

  54. [54]

    J. R. Ellis and L. Mizrachi, Multiloop No Renormalization Theorems for the Ten-dimensional Heterotic String, Nucl. Phys. B327, 595 (1989)

  55. [55]

    E. A. Bergshoeff and M. de Roo, The Quartic Effective Action of the Heterotic String and Supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B328, 439 (1989)

  56. [56]

    Enhanced Coset Symmetries and Higher Derivative Corrections

    N. Lambert and P. C. West, Enhanced Coset Symmetries and Higher Derivative Corrections, Phys. Rev. D74, 065002 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603255

  57. [57]

    L. Bao, M. Cederwall, and B. E. W. Nilsson, Aspects of higher curvature terms and U-duality, Class. Quant. Grav.25, 095001 (2008), arXiv:0706.1183 [hep-th]

  58. [58]

    C. Eloy, O. Hohm, and H. Samtleben, U duality andα’ corrections in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. D108, 026015 (2023), arXiv:2211.16358 [hep-th]

  59. [59]

    J. T. Liu and R. J. Saskowski, Four-derivative corrections to minimal gauged supergravity in five dimensions, JHEP05, 171, arXiv:2201.04690 [hep-th]

  60. [60]

    Cremmer, I

    E. Cremmer, I. V. Lavrinenko, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, K. S. Stelle, and T. A. Tran, Euclidean signature supergravities, dualities and instantons, Nucl. Phys. B534, 40 (1998), arXiv:hep- th/9803259

  61. [61]

    Poincare Duality and G+++ algebra's

    A. Keurentjes, Poincare duality and G+++ algebra’s, Commun. Math. Phys.275, 491 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0510212

  62. [62]

    Universal BPS structure of stationary supergravity solutions

    G. Bossard, H. Nicolai, and K. S. Stelle, Universal BPS structure of stationary supergravity solutions, JHEP07, 003, arXiv:0902.4438 [hep-th]

  63. [63]

    Dixmier, Sur les repr´ esentations unitaires des groupes de lie nilpotents

    J. Dixmier, Sur les repr´ esentations unitaires des groupes de lie nilpotents. iii, Canad J Math. 10, 321–348 (1958)

  64. [64]

    J. T. Liu and R. J. Saskowski, Consistent truncations in higher derivative supergravity, JHEP 09, 136, arXiv:2307.12420 [hep-th]

  65. [65]

    W. H. Baron, D. Marques, and C. A. Nunez,βSymmetry of Supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 061601 (2023), arXiv:2209.02079 [hep-th]

  66. [66]

    W. H. Baron, D. Marques, and C. A. Nunez, Exploring theβsymmetry of supergravity, JHEP 12, 006, arXiv:2307.02537 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    Duality Groups, Automorphic Forms and Higher Derivative Corrections

    N. Lambert and P. C. West, Duality Groups, Automorphic Forms and Higher Derivative Corrections, Phys. Rev. D75, 066002 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0611318

  68. [68]

    Nonperturbative corrections to 4D string theory effective actions from SL(2,Z) duality and supersymmetry

    D. Robles-Llana, M. Rocek, F. Saueressig, U. Theis, and S. Vandoren, Nonperturbative cor- rections to 4D string theory effective actions from SL(2,Z) duality and supersymmetry, Phys. 27 Rev. Lett.98, 211602 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0612027

  69. [69]

    D-instantons and twistors

    S. Alexandrov, B. Pioline, F. Saueressig, and S. Vandoren, D-instantons and twistors, JHEP 03, 044, arXiv:0812.4219 [hep-th]

  70. [70]

    D-instantons and twistors: some exact results

    S. Alexandrov, D-instantons and twistors: Some exact results, J. Phys. A42, 335402 (2009), arXiv:0902.2761 [hep-th]

  71. [71]

    Black Hole Entropy, Special Geometry and Strings

    T. Mohaupt, Black hole entropy, special geometry and strings, Fortsch. Phys.49, 3 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0007195

  72. [72]

    U-duality and D-brane Combinatorics

    B. Pioline and E. Kiritsis, U duality and D-brane combinatorics, Phys. Lett. B418, 61 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9710078

  73. [73]

    N. A. Obers and B. Pioline, Eisenstein series and string thresholds, Commun. Math. Phys. 209, 275 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9903113

  74. [74]

    $R^4$ couplings and automorphic unipotent representations

    B. Pioline, R**4 couplings and automorphic unipotent representations, JHEP03, 116, arXiv:1001.3647 [hep-th]

  75. [75]

    M. B. Green, J. G. Russo, and P. Vanhove, Automorphic properties of low energy string amplitudes in various dimensions, Phys. Rev. D81, 086008 (2010), arXiv:1001.2535 [hep-th]

  76. [76]

    M. B. Green, S. D. Miller, and P. Vanhove, Small representations, string instantons, and Fourier modes of Eisenstein series, J. Number Theor.146, 187 (2015), arXiv:1111.2983 [hep- th]

  77. [77]

    Supergravity divergences, supersymmetry and automorphic forms

    G. Bossard and A. Kleinschmidt, Supergravity divergences, supersymmetry and automorphic forms, JHEP08, 102, arXiv:1506.00657 [hep-th]

  78. [78]

    Loops in exceptional field theory

    G. Bossard and A. Kleinschmidt, Loops in exceptional field theory, JHEP01, 164, arXiv:1510.07859 [hep-th]

  79. [79]

    Ozkan, Y

    M. Ozkan, Y. Pang, and E. Sezgin, Higher derivative supergravities in diverse dimensions, Phys. Rept.1086, 1 (2024), arXiv:2401.08945 [hep-th]

  80. [80]

    Modular forms on $G_2$ and their standard $L$-function

    A. Pollack, Modular forms ong 2 and their standardl-function (2018), arXiv:1807.03884 [math.NT]

Showing first 80 references.