Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Swapping only the reinforcement-learning optimiser raises embodied semantic scene-graph completeness by 21 percent under the same rewards.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 18:16 UTC pith:7NEFL5RM

load-bearing objection Document mismatch: abstract is RL navigation for SSG; full text is a multimessenger SEP/G-dot paper—cannot audit the 21% claim. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.25415 v2 pith:7NEFL5RM submitted 2026-03-26 cs.AI cs.RO

Modernising Reinforcement Learning-Based Navigation for Embodied Semantic Scene Graph Generation

Roman K\"uble , Marco H\"uller , Mrunmai Phatak , Rainer Lienhart , J\"org H\"ahner This is my paper
classification cs.AI cs.RO
keywords semantic scene graphsembodied AIreinforcement learningnavigationaction space designpolicy optimisationorganic computing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Embodied agents need semantic scene graphs—compact models of objects, relations, and spatial context—to act under uncertainty, yet they must build those graphs inside a limited action budget. This paper modernises a modular navigation component for that task by replacing the policy-optimisation method and by revisiting how discrete motions are defined. It compares compact versus finer-grained motion sets and single-head atomic policies versus factorised multi-head policies over action components, while also testing curriculum learning and optional depth-based collision supervision. Under identical reward shaping, the optimiser replacement alone improves scene-graph completeness by 21 percent relative to the baseline. Depth mainly improves collision-free execution rather than completeness, and the strongest completeness–efficiency trade-off comes from pairing modern optimisation with a finer-grained factorised action representation.

Core claim

For embodied semantic scene graph generation, replacing the policy-optimisation algorithm alone improves SSG completeness by 21 percent relative to the baseline under identical reward shaping. Depth-based collision supervision primarily improves execution safety (collision-free motion) while leaving completeness largely unchanged. Combining the modern optimiser with a finer-grained, factorised multi-head discrete action representation yields the strongest overall completeness–efficiency trade-off among the configurations studied.

What carries the argument

A modular navigation policy for embodied SSG generation: either a single-head policy over atomic discrete actions or a factorised multi-head policy over action components, trained with a modern policy-optimisation method (with optional curriculum and depth-based collision supervision) to trade information gain against navigation cost within a finite action horizon.

Load-bearing premise

The reported 21 percent completeness gain and the completeness–efficiency ranking assume the evaluation setup fairly isolates optimiser and action-space effects from environment- or implementation-specific artefacts under fixed reward shaping.

What would settle it

Retrain baseline and modernised policies with identical reward shaping in the same embodied SSG setup and check whether completeness still rises by about 21 percent when only the optimiser changes, and whether the finer factorised action set still wins the completeness–efficiency trade-off.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • SSG navigation stacks can gain substantial completeness by upgrading only the RL optimiser without redesigning the reward.
  • Finer-grained factorised discrete actions become the preferred design when completeness and navigation efficiency must be balanced together.
  • Depth is most useful as a collision-safety signal, not as a primary driver of semantic completeness.
  • Budgeted exploration for semantic world models can cut diminishing-return actions by adopting these optimiser and action-space choices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same optimiser-plus-factorised-action pattern may transfer to other budgeted information-seeking navigation tasks beyond SSG construction.
  • If multi-head factorisation keeps winning, discrete motion libraries for indoor agents may shift toward compositional primitives rather than large flat action menus.
  • Cross-simulator or real-robot replications would show whether the 21 percent gain is method-level or tied to one stack.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The abstract claims a modular navigation component for Embodied Semantic Scene Graph (SSG) Generation that modernises RL decision-making by replacing the policy optimiser and revisiting discrete action design. It compares compact vs finer-grained motion sets and single-head atomic vs factorised multi-head policies, with optional curriculum learning and depth-based collision supervision. Under identical reward shaping, swapping only the optimiser is reported to raise SSG completeness by 21% relative to a baseline; depth mainly improves collision-free execution rather than completeness; and modern optimisation plus a finer-grained factorised action space yields the best completeness–efficiency trade-off. The materials supplied under this paper ID, however, do not contain methods, baselines, ablations, tables, or figures for that RL study: the full-text body is a different manuscript (a multimessenger GR/GW analysis of a varying gravitational constant with GW170817).

Significance. If the abstract’s controlled ablation results hold under a fair modular protocol, the work would be a useful systems contribution for Organic Computing and embodied semantic mapping: isolating optimiser and action-factorisation effects under fixed reward shaping is a clear, falsifiable claim, and a 21% completeness gain with improved efficiency would matter for finite-horizon exploration. Those strengths cannot be credited from the present package, because the experimental design, baselines, variance, and evaluation protocol are not available under this ID. Significance therefore remains conditional on a correct, complete manuscript matching the abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. Document identity / completeness: the abstract and title describe an RL navigation study for Embodied SSG Generation (cs.AI), but the full manuscript text provided under this ID is an unrelated gr-qc paper on multimessenger tests of a varying G with GW170817 (waveform model, sensitivities, Bayesian inference on GW170817). No methods, baselines, reward definition, action-space formalisation, training protocol, tables, or figures exist for the claimed 21% completeness gain or the completeness–efficiency ranking. The central empirical claims cannot be audited.
  2. Load-bearing experimental claim (abstract): “replacing the optimisation algorithm alone improves SSG completeness by 21% relative to the baseline under identical reward shaping.” Without the matching methods section, named baseline optimiser, reward terms/weights, completeness metric definition, action budget, environment, number of seeds, and variance/confidence intervals, this number is not reviewable. The same holds for the claim that modern optimisation plus a finer-grained factorised action representation yields the strongest overall trade-off.
  3. Evaluation axes (abstract): SSG completeness, execution safety, and navigation behaviour are asserted as primary metrics, and depth is said to affect safety but not completeness. Absent metric definitions, collision criteria, and ablations that hold reward shaping fixed while varying only optimiser / action factorisation / depth supervision, it is impossible to confirm that the modular component isolates the intended factors rather than environment- or implementation-specific artefacts.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract only: the discrete motion sets (“compact” vs “finer-grained, larger”) and the single-head vs multi-head factorisation are named but not specified (e.g., action cardinalities, component factors). These should be stated once the correct full text is supplied.
  2. Abstract only: “identical reward shaping” is central to the causal claim about the optimiser swap; the reward terms and any curriculum schedule should be listed explicitly in the methods of the matching manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the abstract states empirical ablation results under fixed reward shaping, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The available material for arXiv:2603.25415 is the abstract of an RL navigation / SSG-generation paper. Its load-bearing claims are controlled empirical comparisons: under identical reward shaping, swapping only the policy optimiser yields a reported +21% relative SSG completeness gain; depth supervision mainly affects collision-free execution; and modern optimisation plus a finer-grained factorised discrete action space gives the best completeness–efficiency trade-off. These are falsifiable experimental outcomes, not self-definitional identities, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, uniqueness theorems imported from the same authors, or ansatzes smuggled via self-citation. The CACHEABLE full-text body is a different manuscript (gr-qc multimessenger SEP test, arXiv 2603.25413) and cannot be used to invent circular steps for 2603.25415. Residual risks (metric/reward tuning, generalisation beyond the unseen sim stack) are evaluation-validity concerns, not circularity. Score 0; steps empty.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review of the RL/SSG navigation paper. Load-bearing premises are standard RL and embodied-AI assumptions plus experimental design choices that cannot be fully enumerated without methods. No free parameters or invented physical entities are named in the abstract; the work is empirical systems research.

free parameters (3)
  • Reward shaping (unspecified weights/terms)
    Abstract claims 21% gain under identical reward shaping; the shaping itself is a design choice that defines the optimisation target and is not specified in the abstract.
  • Action budget / finite horizon
    Core evaluation is under a limited action budget; the budget value and stopping criterion are free experimental settings that drive completeness–efficiency trade-offs.
  • Discrete motion set sizes (compact vs finer-grained)
    Choice of action discretisation is a hand-designed hyperparameter of the study and directly affects the reported best trade-off.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Semantic scene graphs are a suitable compact representation for objective-driven embodied self-adaptation under uncertainty and resource constraints.
    Stated as motivation in the abstract; not derived here.
  • domain assumption Discrete-action RL with single-head or factorised multi-head policies is an appropriate decision model for the navigation component.
    Methodological premise of the modernisation study.
  • ad hoc to paper SSG completeness, collision-free execution, and navigation behaviour are the right primary evaluation axes for the claimed trade-off.
    Abstract defines success via these metrics; full metric definitions unavailable.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 19440 in / 2500 out tokens · 38223 ms · 2026-07-13T18:16:04.860493+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Semantic world models enable embodied agents to reason about objects, relations, and spatial context beyond purely geometric representations. In Organic Computing, such models are a key enabler for objective-driven self-adaptation under uncertainty and resource constraints. The core challenge is to acquire observations maximising model quality and downstream usefulness within a limited action budget. Semantic scene graphs (SSGs) provide a structured and compact representation for this purpose. However, constructing them within a finite action horizon requires exploration strategies that trade off information gain against navigation cost and decide when additional actions yield diminishing returns. This work presents a modular navigation component for Embodied Semantic Scene Graph Generation and modernises its decision-making by replacing the policy-optimisation method and revisiting the discrete action formulation. We study compact and finer-grained, larger discrete motion sets and compare a single-head policy over atomic actions with a factorised multi-head policy over action components. We evaluate curriculum learning and optional depth-based collision supervision, and assess SSG completeness, execution safety, and navigation behaviour. Results show that replacing the optimisation algorithm alone improves SSG completeness by 21\% relative to the baseline under identical reward shaping. Depth mainly affects execution safety (collision-free motion), while completeness remains largely unchanged. Combining modern optimisation with a finer-grained, factorised action representation yields the strongest overall completeness--efficiency trade-off.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ACE-Brain-0.5: A Unified Embodied Foundational Model for Physical Agentic AI

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A single 8B backbone unifies spatial perception, decision making, navigation/manipulation, and progress estimation with SSR+ merging, reporting gains on most spatial benchmarks and competitive action/progress results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Astrophys

    Ghez, A.M., Salim, S., Hornstein, S.D., Tanner, A., Morris, M., Becklin, E.E., Duchene, G.: Stellar orbits around the galactic center black hole. Astrophys. J.620, 744–757 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1086/427175 arXiv:astro- ph/0306130

    doi:10.1086/427175 2005

  2. [2]

    Living Rev

    Psaltis, D.: Probes and Tests of Strong-Field Gravity with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum. Living Rev. Rel.11, 9 (2008) https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2008-9 arXiv:0806.1531 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-9 2008

  3. [3]

    Living Rev

    Will, C.M.: The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Rev. Rel.17, 4 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2014-4 arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 2014

  4. [4]

    Living Rev

    Freire, P.C.C., Wex, N.: Gravity experiments with radio pulsars. Living Rev. Rel.27(1), 5 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s41114-024-00051-y arXiv:2407.16540 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Williams, J.G., Turyshev, S.G., Boggs, D.H.: Progress in lunar laser ranging tests of relativistic gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 261101 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.261101 arXiv:gr-qc/0411113

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.261101 2004

  6. [6]

    Hofmann, F., M ¨uller, J.: Relativistic tests with lunar laser ranging. Class. Quant. Grav.35(3), 035015 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa8f7a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa8f7a 2018

  7. [7]

    3: Long - term monitoring of PSRs B1855+09 and B1937+21

    Kaspi, V .M., Taylor, J.H., Ryba, M.F.: High - precision timing of millisecond pulsars. 3: Long - term monitoring of PSRs B1855+09 and B1937+21. Astrophys. J.428, 713 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1086/174280

    doi:10.1086/174280 1994

  8. [8]

    Thorsett, S.E.: The Gravitational constant, the Chandrasekhar limit, and neutron star masses. Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1432–1435 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1432 arXiv:astro-ph/9607003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1432 1996

  9. [9]

    Astrophys

    Deller, A.T., Verbiest, J.P.W., Tingay, S.J., Bailes, M.: Extremely high precision VLBI astrometry of PSR J0437- 4715 and implications for theories of gravity. Astrophys. J. Lett.685, 67 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1086/592401 arXiv:0808.1594 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/592401 2008

  10. [10]

    Astrophys

    Zhu, W.W.,et al.: Testing Theories of Gravitation Using 21-Year Timing of Pulsar Binary J1713+0747. Astrophys. J.809(1), 41 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/41 arXiv:1504.00662 [astro-ph.SR] 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/41 2015

  11. [11]

    Zhu, W.W.,et al.: Tests of Gravitational Symmetries with Pulsar Binary J1713+0747. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 482(3), 3249–3260 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2905 arXiv:1802.09206 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2905 2019

  12. [12]

    Wu, F., Chen, X.: Cosmic microwave background with Brans-Dicke gravity II: constraints with the WMAP and SDSS data. Phys. Rev. D82, 083003 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.083003 arXiv:0903.0385 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.083003 2010

  13. [13]

    Abbott, B.P.,et al.: GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett.119(16), 161101 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  14. [14]

    Astrophys

    Abbott, B.P.,et al.: Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett.848(2), 13 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c 2017

  15. [15]

    Astrophys

    Abbott, B.P.,et al.: Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophys. J. Lett.848(2), 12 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9 arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9 2017

  16. [16]

    Soares-Santos, M.,et al.: The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Discovery of the Optical Counterpart Using the Dark Energy Camera. Astrophys. J. Lett.848(2), 16 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa9059 arXiv:1710.05459 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9059 2017

  17. [17]

    Astrophys

    Cantiello, M.,et al.: A Precise Distance to the Host Galaxy of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817 Using Surface Brightness Fluctuations. Astrophys. J. Lett.854(2), 31 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aaad64 arXiv:1801.06080 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaad64 2018

  18. [18]

    Nature554, 207 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25452 arXiv:1711.11573 [astro-ph.HE]

    Mooley, K.P.,et al.: A mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow in the neutron star merger GW170817. Nature554, 207 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25452 arXiv:1711.11573 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature25452 2018

  19. [19]

    Nature561(7723), 355–359 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0486-3 arXiv:1806.09693 [astro-ph.HE]

    Mooley, K.P., Deller, A.T., Gottlieb, O., Nakar, E., Hallinan, G., Bourke, S., Frail, D.A., Horesh, A., Corsi, A., Hotokezaka, K.: Superluminal motion of a relativistic jet in the neutron-star merger GW170817. Nature561(7723), 355–359 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0486-3 arXiv:1806.09693 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0486-3 2018

  20. [20]

    Nature610(7931), 273–276 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05145-7 arXiv:2210.06568 [astro-ph.HE]

    Mooley, K.P., Anderson, J., Lu, W.: Optical superluminal motion measurement in the neutron-star merger GW170817. Nature610(7931), 273–276 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05145-7 arXiv:2210.06568 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05145-7 2022

  21. [21]

    Nordtvedt, K.: ˙G/Gand a cosmological acceleration of gravitationally compact bodies. Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 953– 956 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.953

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.953 1990

  22. [22]

    https://gwosc

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration: The Gravitational-wave Transient Catalog. https://gwosc. org/eventapi/html/GWTC/(2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Biwer, C.M., Capano, C.D., De, S., Cabero, M., Brown, D.A., Nitz, A.H., Raymond, V .: PyCBC Inference: A Python-based parameter estimation toolkit for compact binary coalescence signals. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131(996), 024503 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/aaef0b arXiv:1807.10312 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaef0b 2019

  24. [24]

    Bonilla, G.S., Kumar, P., Teukolsky, S.A.: Modeling compact binary merger waveforms beyond general relativity. Phys. Rev. D107(2), 024015 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.024015 arXiv:2203.14026 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.024015 2023

  25. [25]

    Song, H., Li, H., Lyu, Z., Zhu, J., Wang, J.-C., Ji, P.: Constraining noncommutative spacetime with GW150914 and GW190814 (2025) arXiv:2507.23442 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Astrophys

    Nitz, A.H., Kumar, S., Wang, Y .-F., Kastha, S., Wu, S., Sch¨afer, M., Dhurkunde, R., Capano, C.D.: 4-OGC: Catalog of Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Mergers. Astrophys. J.946(2), 59 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/aca591 arXiv:2112.06878 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Chamberlain, K., Yunes, N.: Theoretical Physics Implications of Gravitational Wave Observation with Future Detectors. Phys. Rev. D96(8), 084039 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.084039 arXiv:1704.08268 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.084039 2017

  28. [28]

    Tahura, S., Yagi, K.: Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Gravitational Waveforms in Various Modified Theories of Gravity. Phys. Rev. D98(8), 084042 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.084042 arXiv:1809.00259 [gr- qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 109902 (2020)] 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.084042 2018

  29. [30]

    Vijaykumar, A., Kapadia, S.J., Ajith, P.: Constraints on the time variation of the gravitational constant using gravitational-wave observations of binary neutron stars. Phys. Rev. Lett.126(14), 141104 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.126.141104 arXiv:2003.12832 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [31]

    Barbieri, R., Savastano, S., Speri, L., Antonelli, A., Sberna, L., Burke, O., Gair, J., Tamanini, N.: Constraining the evolution of Newton’s constant with slow inspirals observed from spaceborne gravitational-wave detectors. Phys. Rev. D107(6), 064073 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.064073 arXiv:2207.10674 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.064073 2023

  31. [32]

    Wang, Z., Zhao, J., An, Z., Shao, L., Cao, Z.: Simultaneous bounds on the gravitational dipole radiation and varying gravitational constant from compact binary inspirals. Phys. Lett. B834, 137416 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2022.137416 arXiv:2208.11913 [gr-qc]

    doi:10.1016/j 2022

  32. [33]

    An, J., Xue, Y ., Cao, Z., He, X., Sun, B.: The effect of the gravitational constant variation on the propaga- tion of gravitational waves. Phys. Lett. B844, 138108 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138108 arXiv:2307.15382 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138108 2023

  33. [34]

    Sun, B., An, J., Cao, Z.: Constrain the time variation of the gravitational constant via the propagation of gravitational waves. Phys. Lett. B848, 138350 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138350 arXiv:2308.00233 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138350 2024

  34. [35]

    Yuan, X., Zhang, J.-d., Mei, J.: Distinguishing the environmental effects and modified theory of gravity with mul- tiple massive black-hole binaries. Phys. Rev. D111(10), 104050 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111. 104050 arXiv:2412.00915 [gr-qc]

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.111 2025

  35. [36]

    An, J., Sun, B., Cao, Z.: The effect of the gravitational constant variation on the phase of gravitational waves. Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102062 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.102062 arXiv:2508.21746 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102062 2025

  36. [37]

    Yunes:2009k, N., Yunes:2009k, F.: Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework. Phys. Rev. D80, 122003 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 80.122003 arXiv:0909.3328 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd 2009

  37. [38]

    Lattimer, J.M.: Neutron star structure and the equation of state. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.186, 1–8 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.186.1

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.186.1 2010

  38. [39]

    Astrophys

    Lattimer, J.M., Prakash, M.: Neutron star structure and the equation of state. Astrophys. J.550, 426 (2001) https: //doi.org/10.1086/319702 arXiv:astro-ph/0002232

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/319702 2001

  39. [40]

    Astrophys

    Will, C.M., Zaglauer, H.W.: Gravitational Radiation, Close Binary Systems, and the Brans-dicke Theory of Gravity. Astrophys. J.346, 366 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1086/168016

    work page doi:10.1086/168016 1989

  40. [41]

    Hawking, S.W.: Black holes in the Brans-Dicke theory of gravitation. Commun. Math. Phys.25, 167–171 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01877518

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01877518 1972

  41. [42]

    Free software (GPL) (2018)

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, KAGRA Collaboration: LVK Algorithm Library - LALSuite. Free software (GPL) (2018). https://doi.org/10.7935/GT1W-FZ16

    doi:10.7935/gt1w-fz16 2018

  42. [43]

    SoftwareX12, 100634 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100634

    Wette, K.: SWIGLAL: Python and Octave interfaces to the LALSuite gravitational-wave data analysis libraries. SoftwareX12, 100634 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100634

    doi:10.1016/j.softx.2020.100634 2020

  43. [44]

    Finn, L.S.: Detection, measurement and gravitational radiation. Phys. Rev. D46, 5236–5249 (1992) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.46.5236 arXiv:gr-qc/9209010 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.5236 1992