pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.25435 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-26 · 🧮 math.AP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Wave-Current-Bathymetry Interaction Revisited: Modeling, Analysis and Asymptotics

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords wave-current interactionbathymetryDirichlet-to-Neumann operatorsemiclassical quantizationmild-slope equationwave action equationSchrödinger equationasymptotic models
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single leading-order surface system with Weyl-quantized Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator unifies classical asymptotic wave models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper begins with the free surface Euler equations and derives a leading-order system expressed only in surface variables that incorporates surface currents and bathymetry through the depth-dependent Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator. This system is shown to be well-posed by appealing to the theory of hyperbolic pseudo-differential operators. For environments that vary slowly, the semiclassical Weyl quantization of the symbol |ξ| tanh(b(X)|ξ|) is introduced as an explicit approximation to the operator; the paper proves this choice is asymptotically accurate at the required order and respects the self-adjoint character of the true operator. From this single formulation the wave action equation, the mild-slope equation, the Schrödinger equation, and the action balance equation are recovered in a systematic manner. The resulting framework therefore supplies a mathematically consistent route from the primitive Euler equations to these classical models, with numerical illustrations confirming the analysis.

Core claim

Starting from the free surface Euler equations, a leading-order system in surface variables is derived that depends on the surface current and on the bathymetry through the depth-dependent Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator. The system is well-posed. In slowly varying media the semiclassical Weyl quantization of the symbol g_b(X,ξ)=|ξ|tanh(b(X)|ξ|) supplies an asymptotically accurate and self-adjoint-consistent approximation to that operator and thereby furnishes the natural setting in which the classical asymptotic models—the wave action equation, the mild-slope equation, the Schrödinger equation, and the action balance equation—emerge systematically from one formulation.

What carries the argument

The semiclassical Weyl quantization of the symbol g_b(X,ξ)=|ξ|tanh(b(X)|ξ|), which furnishes an explicit, asymptotically accurate approximation to the depth-dependent Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator and carries the reductions to the classical asymptotic models while preserving self-adjointness.

If this is right

  • The wave action equation is recovered directly from the leading-order system under slow-variation scaling.
  • The mild-slope equation appears as a special case within the same unified surface-variable formulation.
  • The Schrödinger equation for narrow-banded waves follows by further asymptotic reduction of the quantized system.
  • The action balance equation is obtained for energy transport in varying currents and bathymetry.
  • All four models inherit well-posedness and self-adjoint structure from the single leading-order system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could support hybrid numerical schemes that transition smoothly between the full surface system and its asymptotic reductions in coastal domains.
  • Similar quantization procedures might extend the unification to weakly nonlinear regimes while retaining mathematical consistency.
  • Ocean-engineering applications could exploit the well-posedness result to assess stability of wave fields over complex bathymetry and currents.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical Weyl quantization of g_b(X,ξ) remains asymptotically accurate to the required order and is consistent with the self-adjoint structure of the true depth-dependent Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator.

What would settle it

Numerical computation of the operator difference between the exact depth-dependent Dirichlet-to-Neumann map and its Weyl quantization applied to a family of test functions on a bathymetry whose spatial scale is comparable to the wavelength, checking whether the discrepancy exceeds the claimed asymptotic order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.25435 by Adrian Kirkeby, Trygve Halsne.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The figure illustrate the main components of our model; propagating waves (top), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The first panel shows a snapshot of the propagating wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In the first panel we see the amplitude Aη(t, X) = p E/g and the simulated wave packet η(t, X) together with the bathymetry and 1D current. The vertical dashed lines indicate the measurement domain Dm. In the second panel we plot the maxima and relative difference of E and E in Dm as a function of time. The vertical dashed lines indicates approximately when the peak of the wave packet enters and leaves Dm.… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The left panels show the pointwise difference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The top panel shows several snapshots of the evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Starting from the free surface Euler equations, we derive a leading-order system in terms of surface variables, depending on the surface current and on the bathymetry through the depth-dependent Dirichlet-to-Neumann (DN) operator. The resulting system is shown to be well-posed using the theory of hyperbolic systems of pseudo-differential operators. We then consider wave propagation in slowly varying environments. As an explicit approximation to the DN operator, the semiclassical Weyl quantization of the symbol $g_b(X,\xi)=|\xi|\tanh(b(X)|\xi|)$ is shown to be both asymptotically accurate and consistent with the self-adjoint structure of the true operator, and to provide the natural framework for asymptotic analysis of the wave system. A central consequence of the resulting framework is that classical asymptotic models - including the wave action equation, the mild-slope equation, the Schr\"odinger equation, and the action balance equation - emerge systematically from a single formulation. By deriving these equations, we show how the simple leading order system with the Weyl quantization of the DN operator provides a unified and mathematically consistent framework for the asymptotic linear theory of wave-current-bathymetry interaction, hence providing a transparent, rigorous and accessible route from the primitive Euler equations to the mentioned asymptotic models. Throughout, numerical experiments are included to illustrate the analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives a leading-order system for surface wave-current-bathymetry interaction directly from the free-surface Euler equations, expressed in surface variables and involving the depth-dependent Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator. Well-posedness is established via the theory of hyperbolic pseudo-differential operators. For slowly varying media the DN operator is replaced by the semiclassical Weyl quantization Op^w(g_b) of the symbol g_b(X,ξ)=|ξ|tanh(b(X)|ξ|), which is asserted to be asymptotically accurate to the requisite order and to preserve self-adjointness. From this single framework the classical models (wave-action equation, mild-slope equation, Schrödinger equation, action-balance equation) are recovered systematically, with numerical illustrations provided throughout.

Significance. If the claimed error estimates for the Weyl quantization hold, the manuscript supplies a mathematically consistent, unified derivation of several classical asymptotic models from the Euler equations. This removes ad-hoc steps that often appear when these models are obtained separately and offers a transparent route for further asymptotic analysis in variable bathymetry and currents.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (quantization step): The central claim that Op^w(g_b) approximates the true depth-dependent DN operator to o(ε) in the energy space when bathymetry and current vary on the 1/ε scale is load-bearing for all subsequent derivations. The manuscript must supply the explicit remainder estimate (or a precise reference to the theorem establishing it) rather than asserting asymptotic accuracy; without this, the emergence of the classical models without uncontrolled transport or phase corrections remains unverified.
  2. [§5.3] §5.3 (derivation of the action-balance equation): The transport terms obtained after substituting Op^w(g_b) must be shown to coincide with the standard form up to o(ε); any hidden lower-order symbol corrections arising from the difference between the true DN operator and its Weyl quantizer would alter the balance equation at the retained order.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§6] Notation for the small parameter ε is introduced in §2 but occasionally omitted in the statements of the asymptotic models in §6; explicit tracking of all O(ε) remainders would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should state the precise values of the slow scale parameter and the bathymetry profile b(X) used in each numerical test.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the precise comments, which help clarify the presentation of the quantization step and its consequences. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (quantization step): The central claim that Op^w(g_b) approximates the true depth-dependent DN operator to o(ε) in the energy space when bathymetry and current vary on the 1/ε scale is load-bearing for all subsequent derivations. The manuscript must supply the explicit remainder estimate (or a precise reference to the theorem establishing it) rather than asserting asymptotic accuracy; without this, the emergence of the classical models without uncontrolled transport or phase corrections remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit remainder estimate strengthens the argument. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new lemma in §4 that states: under the stated smoothness and scaling assumptions on b(X) and the current, ||(DN_b - Op^w(g_b))u||_{H^s} ≤ Cε ||u||_{H^{s+1}} for s sufficiently large. The proof follows from the standard semiclassical composition formula for the difference between the exact symbol of the depth-dependent DN operator and its principal Weyl symbol, together with the remainder in the semiclassical expansion (cf. Zworski, Semiclassical Analysis, Thm. 4.12 and Prop. 8.10). This estimate is o(ε) in the energy space and therefore introduces no uncontrolled transport or phase corrections at the retained order. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.3] §5.3 (derivation of the action-balance equation): The transport terms obtained after substituting Op^w(g_b) must be shown to coincide with the standard form up to o(ε); any hidden lower-order symbol corrections arising from the difference between the true DN operator and its Weyl quantizer would alter the balance equation at the retained order.

    Authors: We will expand the derivation in the revised §5.3. After inserting the Weyl-quantized operator, we perform the explicit symbol calculus for the transport coefficients. The difference between the true DN operator and Op^w(g_b) contributes only terms of size o(ε) by the remainder lemma added in §4; these terms lie below the order retained in the action-balance equation. Consequently the leading-order transport terms coincide exactly with the classical form (ray equations for the group velocity and the refraction term arising from ∇b). The revised text will display the symbol expansion step by step so that the absence of hidden corrections is transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained from Euler equations

full rationale

The paper starts from the free surface Euler equations and derives a leading-order surface system involving the depth-dependent Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator. It then introduces the semiclassical Weyl quantization of g_b(X,ξ)=|ξ|tanh(b(X)|ξ|) as an explicit approximation, which the paper itself shows to be asymptotically accurate and self-adjoint consistent. Classical models (wave action, mild-slope, Schrödinger, action balance) are obtained as systematic consequences of this single framework rather than as inputs or fitted targets. Well-posedness rests on external hyperbolic pseudo-differential operator theory. No quantities are defined in terms of the target asymptotics, no parameters are fitted to them, and no load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard results from the theory of pseudo-differential operators and semiclassical quantization; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond the physical setup of the Euler equations.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator encodes the depth dependence in the linearized water-wave problem
    Invoked when reducing the Euler system to surface variables.
  • standard math Hyperbolic systems of pseudo-differential operators are well-posed under the stated symbol conditions
    Used to establish well-posedness of the leading-order system.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5537 in / 1403 out tokens · 81974 ms · 2026-05-15T00:31:58.102024+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cambridge University Press, 2011

    Mark J Ablowitz.Nonlinear dispersive waves: asymptotic analysis and solitons, vol- ume 47. Cambridge University Press, 2011

  2. [2]

    A mild-slope formulation based on weyl rule of association with application to coastal wave modelling.Wave Motion, 122:103189, 2023

    Gal Akrish, Pieter Smit, Marcel Zijlema, and Ad Reniers. A mild-slope formulation based on weyl rule of association with application to coastal wave modelling.Wave Motion, 122:103189, 2023

  3. [3]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2007

    Serge Alinhac and Patrick G´ erard.Pseudo-differential operators and the Nash-Moser theorem, volume 82. American Mathematical Soc., 2007

  4. [4]

    A three-dimensional dirichlet-to-neumann operator for water waves over topography.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 845:321–345, 2018

    D Andrade and A Nachbin. A three-dimensional dirichlet-to-neumann operator for water waves over topography.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 845:321–345, 2018

  5. [5]

    Lecture notes

    Guillaume Bal. Lecture notes. waves in random media, 2006

  6. [6]

    Capillary–gravity wave transport over spatially random drift.Wave Motion, 35(2):107–124, 2002

    Guillaume Bal and Tom Chou. Capillary–gravity wave transport over spatially random drift.Wave Motion, 35(2):107–124, 2002. 39

  7. [7]

    Analysis of sponge zones for computational fluid mechanics.Journal of Computational Physics, 212(2):681–702, 2006

    Daniel J Bodony. Analysis of sponge zones for computational fluid mechanics.Journal of Computational Physics, 212(2):681–702, 2006

  8. [8]

    Wavetrains in inhomoge- neous moving media.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Francis P Bretherton and Christopher John Raymond Garrett. Wavetrains in inhomoge- neous moving media.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 302(1471):529–554, 1968

  9. [9]

    Cambridge University Press, 2014

    Oliver B¨ uhler.Waves and mean flows. Cambridge University Press, 2014

  10. [10]

    Angel Castro and David Lannes. Well-posedness and shallow-water stability for a new hamiltonian formulation of the water waves equations with vorticity.Indiana University Mathematics Journal, pages 1169–1270, 2015

  11. [11]

    Full double h¨ older regular- ity of the pressure in bounded domains.International Mathematics Research Notices, 2024(3):2511–2560, 2024

    Luigi De Rosa, Micka¨ el Latocca, and Giorgio Stefani. Full double h¨ older regular- ity of the pressure in bounded domains.International Mathematics Research Notices, 2024(3):2511–2560, 2024

  12. [12]

    Dispersive estimates for linearized water wave-type equations in r d

    Tilahun Deneke, Tamirat T Dufera, and Achenef Tesfahun. Dispersive estimates for linearized water wave-type equations in r d. InAnnales Henri Poincar´ e, volume 24, pages 3741–3761. Springer, 2023

  13. [13]

    World Scientific, 1997

    Maarten W Dingemans.Water wave propagation over uneven bottoms (in 2 parts), volume 13. World Scientific, 1997

  14. [14]

    American Mathematical Society, 2022

    Lawrence C Evans.Partial differential equations, volume 19. American Mathematical Society, 2022

  15. [15]

    A simple criterion for essential self-adjointness of weyl pseudodifferential operators: R

    Robert Fulsche and Lauritz van Luijk. A simple criterion for essential self-adjointness of weyl pseudodifferential operators: R. fulsche, l. van luijk.Journal of Pseudo-Differential Operators and Applications, 16(2):38, 2025

  16. [16]

    Patrick G´ erard, Peter A Markowich, Norbert J Mauser, and Fr´ ed´ eric Poupaud. Homoge- nization limits and wigner transforms.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathemat- ics: A Journal Issued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 50(4):323–379, 1997

  17. [17]

    Springer, 1977

    David Gilbarg, Neil S Trudinger, David Gilbarg, and NS Trudinger.Elliptic partial differential equations of second order, volume 224. Springer, 1977

  18. [18]

    Springer, 2001

    Karlheinz Gr¨ ochenig.Foundations of time-frequency analysis, volume 359. Springer, 2001

  19. [19]

    Ocean wave tracing v

    Trygve Halsne, Kai H˚ akon Christensen, Gaute Hope, and Øyvind Breivik. Ocean wave tracing v. 1: a numerical solver of the wave ray equations for ocean waves on variable currents at arbitrary depths.Geoscientific Model Development, 16(22):6515–6530, 2023

  20. [20]

    Springer Cham, 2025

    Peter Hintz.An Introduction to Microlocal Analysis. Springer Cham, 2025

  21. [21]

    Cambridge university press, 2010

    Leo H Holthuijsen.Waves in oceanic and coastal waters. Cambridge university press, 2010

  22. [22]

    N. Hunt J. editor.Gravity Waves in Water of Finite Depth, volume 10 ofAdvances in Fluid Mechanics. Computational Mechanics Publications, 1997

  23. [23]

    Mathematical and computational meth- ods for semiclassical schr¨ odinger equations.Acta Numerica, 20:121–209, 2011

    Shi Jin, Peter Markowich, and Christof Sparber. Mathematical and computational meth- ods for semiclassical schr¨ odinger equations.Acta Numerica, 20:121–209, 2011. 40

  24. [24]

    Number 19

    Robin Stanley Johnson.A modern introduction to the mathematical theory of water waves. Number 19. Cambridge university press, 1997

  25. [25]

    World Scientific, 2020

    J William Kamphuis.Introduction to coastal engineering and management, volume 48. World Scientific, 2020

  26. [26]

    Higher-order approximations in the parabolic equation method for water waves.Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 91(C1):933–952, 1986

    James T Kirby. Higher-order approximations in the parabolic equation method for water waves.Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 91(C1):933–952, 1986

  27. [27]

    A parabolic equation for the combined refraction–diffraction of stokes waves by mildly varying topography.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 136:453–466, 1983

    James T Kirby and Robert A Dalrymple. A parabolic equation for the combined refraction–diffraction of stokes waves by mildly varying topography.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 136:453–466, 1983

  28. [28]

    Imaging of seabed topography from the scattering of water waves

    Adrian Kirkeby. Imaging of seabed topography from the scattering of water waves. Water Waves, 7(1):1–33, 2025

  29. [29]

    Cambridge univer- sity press UK, 1994

    Gerbrand Johan Komen, L Cavaleri, M Donelan, K Hasselmann, S Hasselmann, PAEM Janssen, et al.Dynamics and modelling of ocean waves, volume 532. Cambridge univer- sity press UK, 1994

  30. [30]

    Springer, 2014

    Rainer Kress.Linear integral equations, 3’rd Edition, volume 82. Springer, 2014

  31. [31]

    Amer- ican Mathematical Society, 2013

    David Lannes.The water waves problem: mathematical analysis and asymptotics. Amer- ican Mathematical Society, 2013

  32. [32]

    On the spectra of the gravity water waves linearized at monotone shear flows.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 406(2):41, 2025

    Xiao Liu and Chongchun Zeng. On the spectra of the gravity water waves linearized at monotone shear flows.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 406(2):41, 2025

  33. [33]

    The changes in amplitude of short gravity waves on steady non-uniform currents.Journal of fluid mechanics, 10(4):529– 549, 1961

    Michael S Longuet-Higgins and RW129244 Stewart. The changes in amplitude of short gravity waves on steady non-uniform currents.Journal of fluid mechanics, 10(4):529– 549, 1961

  34. [34]

    Springer, 2002

    Andr´ e Martinez.An introduction to semiclassical and microlocal analysis, volume 994. Springer, 2002

  35. [35]

    Introduction to the uniform geometrical theory of diffraction

    Derek Albert McNamara, Carl WI Pistorius, and JAG Malherbe. Introduction to the uniform geometrical theory of diffraction. 1990

  36. [36]

    World scientific, 1989

    Chiang C Mei.The applied dynamics of ocean surface waves, volume 1. World scientific, 1989

  37. [37]

    Coriolis effect on water waves.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 51(5):1957–1985, 2017

    Benjamin Melinand. Coriolis effect on water waves.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 51(5):1957–1985, 2017

  38. [38]

    Fundamental solutions of linear partial differential operators.Theory and Practice

    Norbert Ortner and Peter Wagner. Fundamental solutions of linear partial differential operators.Theory and Practice. Springer, Cham, 2015

  39. [39]

    Interaction of water waves and currents.Advances in applied mechanics, 16:9–117, 1976

    D Howell Peregrine. Interaction of water waves and currents.Advances in applied mechanics, 16:9–117, 1976

  40. [40]

    O. M. Phillips.The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 1977

  41. [41]

    Pope.Turbulent Flows

    Stephen B. Pope.Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000

  42. [42]

    On the parabolic equation method for water-wave propagation.Journal of fluid mechanics, 95(1):159–176, 1979

    AC Radder. On the parabolic equation method for water-wave propagation.Journal of fluid mechanics, 95(1):159–176, 1979. 41

  43. [43]

    Alan Riquier and Emmanuel Dormy. Do irrotational water waves remain irrotational in the limit of a vanishing viscosity?Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 482(2329), 2026

  44. [44]

    McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2 edition, 1991

    Walter Rudin.Functional Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2 edition, 1991

  45. [45]

    On the lagrangian dynamics of atmospheric zonal jets and the permeability of the stratospheric polar vortex.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 64(10):3595–3610, 2007

    II Rypina, Michael G Brown, Francisco J Beron-Vera, Huseyin Ko¸ cak, Maria J Olasco- aga, and IA Udovydchenkov. On the lagrangian dynamics of atmospheric zonal jets and the permeability of the stratospheric polar vortex.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 64(10):3595–3610, 2007

  46. [46]

    Schmid and Dan S

    Peter J. Schmid and Dan S. Henningson.Stability and Transition in Shear Flows, volume 142 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, New York, 2001

  47. [47]

    On recent developments in the spectral prob- lem for the linearized euler equation.Contemporary Mathematics, 371:271–296, 2005

    Roman Shvydkoy and Susan Friedlander. On recent developments in the spectral prob- lem for the linearized euler equation.Contemporary Mathematics, 371:271–296, 2005

  48. [48]

    The evolution of inhomogeneous wave statistics through a variable medium.Journal of Physical Oceanography, 43(8):1741–1758, 2013

    PB Smit and TT Janssen. The evolution of inhomogeneous wave statistics through a variable medium.Journal of Physical Oceanography, 43(8):1741–1758, 2013

  49. [49]

    Cambridge University Press, 2017

    Christopher D Sogge.Fourier integrals in classical analysis, volume 210. Cambridge University Press, 2017

  50. [50]

    Courier Dover Publications, 2019

    James Johnston Stoker.Water waves: The mathematical theory with applications. Courier Dover Publications, 2019

  51. [51]

    M Taylor.Partial differential equations II: Qualitative studies of linear equations, volume

  52. [52]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

  53. [53]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2014

    Gerald Teschl.Mathematical methods in quantum mechanics, volume 157. American Mathematical Soc., 2014

  54. [54]

    SIAM, 2000

    Lloyd N Trefethen.Spectral methods in MATLAB. SIAM, 2000

  55. [55]

    John Wiley & Sons, 2011

    Gerald Beresford Whitham.Linear and nonlinear waves. John Wiley & Sons, 2011

  56. [56]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2012

    Maciej Zworski.Semiclassical analysis, volume 138. American Mathematical Soc., 2012. 42