pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.25786 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-26 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Hov{r}ava-Witten theory on {S}¹vee{S}¹ as type 0 orientifold

Chiara Altavista , Edoardo Anastasi , Salvatore Raucci , Angel M. Uranga , Chuying Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords Horava-Witten theorytype 0B orientifoldM-theory on S1 vee S1gauge group SO(16)^4Z2 quotientE8 wallsjunction pointstring duality
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hořava-Witten theory on S¹∨S¹ is dual to a type 0B orientifold with gauge group SO(16)^4.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a duality between the Hořava-Witten theory compactified on the joined circles S¹∨S¹ and a type 0B string orientifold whose gauge group is four copies of SO(16). This supplies a geometric account of why the gauge group doubles in the orientifold description. The matching of perturbative spectra between the two sides further indicates that new degrees of freedom tied to the junction point must appear in the M-theory picture. A reader cares because the correspondence links a novel M-theory geometry to standard string orientifolds and thereby organizes otherwise puzzling features of the ten-dimensional theory.

Core claim

We relate the Hořava-Witten theory on S¹∨S¹ to a 0B orientifold with gauge group SO(16)^4. The resulting dictionary provides a geometric explanation for characteristic features of the 0B orientifold such as the doubling of the gauge group, while the perturbative spectrum of the 0B orientifold indicates the emergence of novel M-theoretic degrees of freedom associated with the junction point. The 0B orientifold further reveals the existence of two variants of the theory on S¹∨S¹ corresponding to equal versus opposite orientations of the E8 walls.

What carries the argument

The Z2 quotient of M-theory on the geometry S¹∨S¹, which is identified with the orientifold projection that produces the type 0B theory.

If this is right

  • The doubling of the gauge group in the 0B orientifold is explained by the structure of the two circles joined at a point in the M-theory geometry.
  • Novel M-theoretic degrees of freedom must exist that are associated with the junction point.
  • The theory on S¹∨S¹ admits two variants distinguished by whether the E8 walls have equal or opposite (Fabinger-Hořava) orientations.
  • Additional 0A and 0B orientifolds exist whose open-string sectors do not arise from higher-dimensional gauge fields in M-theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The duality may allow non-perturbative junction effects to be computed using the M-theory geometry.
  • The junction point could be reinterpreted as a new defect whose properties are visible only in the combined M-theory and orientifold description.
  • The same quotient construction might extend to other quantum geometries and produce further string dualities.

Load-bearing premise

The Z2 quotients of the M-theory compactifications on S¹∨S¹ correspond exactly to the 10d orientifold projections of type 0A and 0B string theories so that the perturbative spectra match.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the full spectrum in the 0B orientifold that fails to reproduce the expected states from the M-theory side, especially any additional modes localized at the junction.

read the original abstract

We investigate dualities between ${\mathbf{Z}}_2$ quotients of recently proposed compactifications of M-theory on `quantum geometries' of the form ${\mathbf{S}}^1\vee{\mathbf{S}}^1$ and 10d orientifolds of type 0A and 0B string theories. In particular, we relate the Ho\v{r}ava-Witten theory on ${\mathbf{S}}^1\vee{\mathbf{S}}^1$ to a 0B orientifold with gauge group $SO(16)^4$. The resulting dictionary provides a geometric explanation for characteristic features of the 0B orientifold, such as the doubling of the gauge group, while the perturbative spectrum of the 0B orientifold indicates the emergence of novel M-theoretic degrees of freedom associated with the junction point. The 0B orientifold further reveals the existence of two variants of the theory on ${\mathbf{S}}^1\vee{\mathbf{S}}^1$, corresponding to equal vs opposite (i.e., standard vs Fabinger-Ho\v{r}ava) orientations of the $E_8$ walls. We also analyze additional 0A and 0B orientifolds whose open string sectors do not arise from higher-dimensional gauge fields in M-theory and whose microscopic interpretation remains an open problem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates dualities between Z_2 quotients of M-theory compactifications on the quantum geometry S¹∨S¹ and 10d orientifolds of type 0A and 0B string theories. It relates the Hořava-Witten theory on S¹∨S¹ to a 0B orientifold with gauge group SO(16)^4, claiming this provides a geometric explanation for the doubling of the gauge group and indicates novel M-theoretic degrees of freedom at the junction point. It further identifies two variants of the S¹∨S¹ theory corresponding to equal versus opposite orientations of the E_8 walls and analyzes additional 0A/0B orientifolds whose open-string sectors lack a higher-dimensional gauge-field interpretation.

Significance. If the proposed dictionary and spectrum matching hold, the work would supply a geometric M-theoretic origin for characteristic features of type 0 orientifolds, including gauge-group doubling via the two-circle geometry, and would suggest new junction-localized degrees of freedom. This could bridge non-supersymmetric string constructions with M-theory in a novel way. The significance is currently limited by the absence of explicit derivations supporting the central mapping.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The central claim that the Z_2 action on M-theory compactified on S¹∨S¹ maps precisely onto the 10d orientifold projection of type 0B (yielding SO(16)^4 and reproducing the full perturbative spectrum, including junction states) is asserted in the abstract and introduction without an explicit mode expansion, partition-function computation, or term-by-term comparison of states.
  2. [Discussion of junction states] The identification of extra states localized at the junction as novel M-theoretic degrees of freedom is inferred from the perturbative spectrum of the 0B orientifold, but the manuscript provides no derivation showing how the Z_2 quotient on S¹∨S¹ produces these states or confirms their M-theoretic origin.
  3. [Variants of the theory] The distinction between the two variants of the S¹∨S¹ theory (equal versus opposite E_8 wall orientations, the latter corresponding to the Fabinger-Hořava case) is stated, yet no consistency checks, spectrum implications, or explicit dictionary entries are supplied to substantiate the claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] The notation S¹∨S¹ is used consistently to denote the wedge-sum geometry, but a brief clarification of its precise definition as a quantum geometry (distinct from a standard manifold) would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each of the major comments below and will make revisions to the manuscript accordingly to improve the clarity and support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and introduction] The central claim that the Z_2 action on M-theory compactified on S¹∨S¹ maps precisely onto the 10d orientifold projection of type 0B (yielding SO(16)^4 and reproducing the full perturbative spectrum, including junction states) is asserted in the abstract and introduction without an explicit mode expansion, partition-function computation, or term-by-term comparison of states.

    Authors: While the abstract and introduction summarize the main results concisely, the body of the manuscript develops the geometric construction and the resulting dictionary. To strengthen the presentation, we will add an explicit schematic mode expansion in a new subsection of the introduction or methods section, along with a term-by-term comparison of the low-energy states. A complete partition function computation is not provided because it can be derived from standard techniques applied to the known Hořava-Witten setup on the junction geometry; however, we will reference the relevant literature and outline the key steps. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Discussion of junction states] The identification of extra states localized at the junction as novel M-theoretic degrees of freedom is inferred from the perturbative spectrum of the 0B orientifold, but the manuscript provides no derivation showing how the Z_2 quotient on S¹∨S¹ produces these states or confirms their M-theoretic origin.

    Authors: The derivation of the junction states follows from the topology of the S¹∨S¹ space, where the junction point introduces additional boundary conditions under the Z_2 action not present in separate circles. We will revise the discussion to include a step-by-step argument showing how these states arise from the quotient and match them explicitly to the extra states in the 0B orientifold spectrum, thereby confirming their M-theoretic origin through the duality. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Variants of the theory] The distinction between the two variants of the S¹∨S¹ theory (equal versus opposite E_8 wall orientations, the latter corresponding to the Fabinger-Hořava case) is stated, yet no consistency checks, spectrum implications, or explicit dictionary entries are supplied to substantiate the claim.

    Authors: We will add a dedicated subsection detailing the two variants, providing explicit dictionary mappings for the gauge groups, fermions, and other fields in each case. Consistency checks will include verifying the anomaly cancellation and matching the perturbative spectra for both equal and opposite orientations, with the opposite case linked to the Fabinger-Hořava construction as noted. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the proposed duality mapping

full rationale

The paper proposes a new dictionary relating Hořava-Witten theory on S¹∨S¹ to a 0B orientifold via Z2 quotients and spectrum matching, explaining features such as gauge group doubling geometrically. No derivation step reduces a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter or self-definition by the paper's own equations. The central relation is presented as an independent identification between two constructions, with spectra serving as consistency checks rather than tautological outputs. Self-citations, if present, support background facts but are not load-bearing for the new mapping itself. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions of M-theory/string duality and Z2 orbifold actions, plus the new identification of junction degrees of freedom whose independent evidence is not supplied in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Z2 quotients of M-theory compactifications on S¹∨S¹ correspond to orientifold projections in type 0A and 0B string theories.
    Invoked when relating the two sides and matching their spectra.
invented entities (1)
  • novel M-theoretic degrees of freedom associated with the junction point no independent evidence
    purpose: To explain features of the perturbative spectrum of the 0B orientifold that do not arise from higher-dimensional gauge fields.
    Suggested by spectrum matching but no independent falsifiable handle is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 1480 out tokens · 48767 ms · 2026-05-15T00:17:06.856008+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost.lean Jcost_pos_of_ne_one unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Hořava-Witten theory on S¹∨S¹ … SO(16)⁴ … Fabinger-Hořava configurations … bifundamental tachyons/fermions at junction

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Art of Branching: Cobordism Junctions of 10d String Theories

    hep-th 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    Explicit worldsheet constructions of 9d junctions joining several 10d string theories via generalized RG flow interpolations and closed tachyon condensation, providing dynamical realizations of multi-theory cobordisms.

  2. A Duality Web for Non-Supersymmetric Strings

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A duality web is proposed in which Z2 quotients of M-theory on S1 vee S1 and F-theory on (S1 vee S1) x S1 map to 0A/0B orientifolds and non-supersymmetric E-type and D-type heterotic strings, providing evidence for ex...

  3. Towards Wedge Construction of Four-Dimensional Non-Supersymmetric Theories and Torsion Classes

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    G2 torsion classes characterize the torsion and supersymmetry breaking in an M-theory compactification on a deformed K3 fibration over a three-manifold, leading to Type 0A and Type 0 heterotic theories upon dimensiona...

  4. Heterotic Ouroboros

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    M-theory on S1 vee S1 with quotients and type I' mechanisms reproduces the light spectra and gauge groups of 10D heterotic theories, with evidence for junctions among them.

  5. Heterotic Ouroboros

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A consistent set of rules from M-theory on S¹ ∨ S¹ combined with type I' enhancements reproduces the light spectra, gauge groups, and global structure of ten-dimensional heterotic string theories, with indications of ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, P. H. Ginsparg, G. W. Moore, and C. Vafa, “An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String,”Phys. Lett. B171(1986) 155–162. 25

    1986

  2. [2]

    String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry,

    L. J. Dixon and J. A. Harvey, “String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry,”Nucl. Phys. B274(1986) 93–105

    1986

  3. [3]

    Spin Structures in String Theory,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Spin Structures in String Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B276 (1986) 272

    1986

  4. [4]

    Some Properties of Open - String Theories

    A. Sagnotti, “Some properties of open string theories,” inInternational Workshop on Supersymmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions (SUSY 95), pp. 473–484. 9, 1995.arXiv:hep-th/9509080

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    Surprises in Open-String Perturbation Theory

    A. Sagnotti, “Surprises in open string perturbation theory,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.56(1997) 332–343,arXiv:hep-th/9702093

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Anomaly Cancellations in the Type I D9-anti-D9 System and the USp(32) String Theory

    S. Sugimoto, “Anomaly cancellations in type I D-9 - anti-D-9 system and the USp(32) string theory,”Prog. Theor. Phys.102(1999) 685–699, arXiv:hep-th/9905159

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking,” arXiv:1711.11494 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua: Brane dynamics, bubbles and the swampland,

    I. Basile, “Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua: Brane dynamics, bubbles and the swampland,”Riv. Nuovo Cim.44no. 10, (2021) 499–596, arXiv:2107.02814 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Angelantonj and I

    C. Angelantonj and I. Florakis,A Lightning Introduction to String Theory. Handbook of Quantum Gravity, 2024.arXiv:2406.09508 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Raucci,Spacetime aspects of non-supersymmetric strings

    S. Raucci,Spacetime aspects of non-supersymmetric strings. PhD thesis, Scuola Normale Superiore, 9, 2024.arXiv:2409.19395 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry

    G. Leone and S. Raucci, “Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry,” arXiv:2509.24703 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Supersymmetry breaking with fields, strings and branes,

    E. Dudas, J. Mourad, and A. Sagnotti, “Supersymmetry breaking with fields, strings and branes,”Phys. Rept.1175(2026) 1–256,arXiv:2511.04367 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    A Non-Supersymmetric Open String Theory and S-Duality

    O. Bergman and M. R. Gaberdiel, “A Nonsupersymmetric open string theory and S duality,”Nucl. Phys. B499(1997) 183–204,arXiv:hep-th/9701137

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  14. [14]

    Duality without Supersymmetry: The Case of the SO(16)xSO(16) String

    J. D. Blum and K. R. Dienes, “Duality without supersymmetry: The Case of the SO(16) x SO(16) string,”Phys. Lett. B414(1997) 260–268,arXiv:hep-th/9707148

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  15. [15]

    Strong/Weak Coupling Duality Relations for Non-Supersymmetric String Theories

    J. D. Blum and K. R. Dienes, “Strong / weak coupling duality relations for nonsupersymmetric string theories,”Nucl. Phys. B516(1998) 83–159, arXiv:hep-th/9707160

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  16. [16]

    Dualities of Type 0 Strings

    O. Bergman and M. R. Gaberdiel, “Dualities of type 0 strings,”JHEP07(1999) 022,arXiv:hep-th/9906055. 26

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  17. [17]

    A Note on Orientifolds and Dualities of Type 0B String Theory

    R. Blumenhagen and A. Kumar, “A Note on orientifolds and dualities of type 0B string theory,”Phys. Lett. B464(1999) 46–52,arXiv:hep-th/9906234

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  18. [18]

    Metastable String Vacua

    C. Angelantonj and E. Dudas, “Metastable string vacua,”Phys. Lett. B651(2007) 239–245,arXiv:0704.2553 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    M-theory onS1∨S1 as Type 0A,

    Z. K. Baykara, E. Dudas, and C. Vafa, “M-theory onS1∨S1 as Type 0A,” arXiv:2603.13468 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Fluxbranes in String Theory

    M. Gutperle and A. Strominger, “Fluxbranes in string theory,”JHEP06(2001) 035, arXiv:hep-th/0104136

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  21. [21]

    Magnetic backgrounds and tachyonic instabilities in closed superstring theory and M-theory

    J. G. Russo and A. A. Tseytlin, “Magnetic backgrounds and tachyonic instabilities in closed superstring theory and M theory,”Nucl. Phys. B611(2001) 93–124, arXiv:hep-th/0104238

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [22]

    Don't Panic! Closed String Tachyons in ALE Spacetimes

    A. Adams, J. Polchinski, and E. Silverstein, “Don’t panic! Closed string tachyons in ALE space-times,”JHEP10(2001) 029,arXiv:hep-th/0108075

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  23. [23]

    Properties of String Theory on Kaluza-Klein Melvin Background

    T. Suyama, “Properties of string theory on Kaluza-Klein Melvin background,”JHEP 07(2002) 015,arXiv:hep-th/0110077

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  24. [24]

    Closed String Tachyon Condensation on Twisted Circles

    J. R. David, M. Gutperle, M. Headrick, and S. Minwalla, “Closed string tachyon condensation on twisted circles,”JHEP02(2002) 041,arXiv:hep-th/0111212

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  25. [25]

    Cosmological unification of string theories

    S. Hellerman and I. Swanson, “Cosmological unification of string theories,”JHEP07 (2008) 022,arXiv:hep-th/0612116

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  26. [26]

    Charting the landscape of supercritical string theory

    S. Hellerman and I. Swanson, “Charting the landscape of supercritical string theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 171601,arXiv:0705.0980 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    Stable Vacua for Tachyonic Strings,

    J. Kaidi, “Stable Vacua for Tachyonic Strings,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 10, (2021) 106026,arXiv:2010.10521 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Open Strings

    C. Angelantonj and A. Sagnotti, “Open strings,”Phys. Rept.371(2002) 1–150, arXiv:hep-th/0204089. [Erratum: Phys.Rept. 376, 407 (2003)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  29. [29]

    Open strings and their symmetry groups

    A. Sagnotti, “Open Strings and their Symmetry Groups,” inNATO Advanced Summer Institute on Nonperturbative Quantum Field Theory (Cargese Summer Institute). 9, 1987.arXiv:hep-th/0208020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1987

  30. [30]

    Open String Orbifolds,

    G. Pradisi and A. Sagnotti, “Open String Orbifolds,”Phys. Lett. B216(1989) 59–67

    1989

  31. [31]

    Strings on World Sheet Orbifolds,

    P. Horava, “Strings on World Sheet Orbifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B327(1989) 461–484

    1989

  32. [32]

    On the systematics of open string theories,

    M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, “On the systematics of open string theories,”Phys. Lett. B247(1990) 517–524. 27

    1990

  33. [33]

    Twist symmetry and open string Wilson lines,

    M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, “Twist symmetry and open string Wilson lines,”Nucl. Phys. B361(1991) 519–538

    1991

  34. [34]

    Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open string theories,

    M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, and A. Sagnotti, “Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open string theories,”Nucl. Phys. B376(1992) 365–386

    1992

  35. [35]

    Heterotic and Type I String Dynamics from Eleven Dimensions

    P. Horava and E. Witten, “Heterotic and Type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 506–524,arXiv:hep-th/9510209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  36. [36]

    Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity on a Manifold with Boundary

    P. Horava and E. Witten, “Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary,”Nucl. Phys. B475(1996) 94–114,arXiv:hep-th/9603142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  37. [37]

    Casimir Effect Between World-Branes in Heterotic M-Theory

    M. Fabinger and P. Horava, “Casimir effect between world branes in heterotic M theory,”Nucl. Phys. B580(2000) 243–263,arXiv:hep-th/0002073

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  38. [38]

    Evidence for Heterotic - Type I String Duality

    J. Polchinski and E. Witten, “Evidence for heterotic - type I string duality,”Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 525–540,arXiv:hep-th/9510169

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  39. [39]

    Charged and Uncharged D-branes in various String Theories

    E. Dudas, J. Mourad, and A. Sagnotti, “Charged and uncharged D-branes in various string theories,”Nucl. Phys. B620(2002) 109–151,arXiv:hep-th/0107081

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  40. [40]

    D-brane probes, RR tadpole cancellation and K-theory charge

    A. M. Uranga, “D-brane probes, RR tadpole cancellation and K-theory charge,” Nucl. Phys. B598(2001) 225–246,arXiv:hep-th/0011048

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  41. [41]

    On Gauge Bosons in the Matrix Model Approach to M Theory

    S. Kachru and E. Silverstein, “On gauge bosons in the matrix model approach to M theory,”Phys. Lett. B396(1997) 70–76,arXiv:hep-th/9612162

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  42. [42]

    D-branes in non-tachyonic 0B orientifolds

    E. Dudas and J. Mourad, “D-branes in nontachyonic 0B orientifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B 598(2001) 189–224,arXiv:hep-th/0010179

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  43. [43]

    The Art of Branching: Cobordism Junctions of 10d String Theories

    C. Altavista, E. Anastasi, R. Angius, and A. M. Uranga, “The Art of Branching: Cobordism Junctions of 10d String Theories,”arXiv:2603.24667 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Dynamical Cobordisms in General Relativity and String Theory

    S. Hellerman and M. Kleban, “Dynamical Cobordisms in General Relativity and String Theory,”JHEP02(2011) 022,arXiv:1009.3277 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    M-theory boundaries beyond supersymmetry,

    M. Montero and L. Zapata, “M-theory boundaries beyond supersymmetry,”JHEP 07(2025) 090,arXiv:2504.06985 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    The Moduli Space and M(atrix) Theory of 9d N=1 Backgrounds of M/String Theory

    O. Aharony, Z. Komargodski, and A. Patir, “The Moduli space and M(atrix) theory of 9d N=1 backgrounds of M/string theory,”JHEP05(2007) 073, arXiv:hep-th/0702195

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    Maximally Supersymmetric String Theories in D<10

    S. Chaudhuri, G. Hockney, and J. D. Lykken, “Maximally supersymmetric string theories in D<10,”Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 2264–2267,arXiv:hep-th/9505054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  48. [48]

    Moduli Space of CHL Strings

    S. Chaudhuri and J. Polchinski, “Moduli space of CHL strings,”Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 7168–7173,arXiv:hep-th/9506048. 28

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  49. [49]

    Strings on Orientifolds

    A. Dabholkar and J. Park, “Strings on orientifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B477(1996) 701–714,arXiv:hep-th/9604178

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  50. [50]

    Comments on Open-String Orbifolds with a Non-Vanishing B_{ab}

    C. Angelantonj, “Comments on open string orbifolds with a nonvanishing B(ab),” Nucl. Phys. B566(2000) 126–150,arXiv:hep-th/9908064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  51. [51]

    Orientifolds and twisted boundary conditions

    A. Keurentjes, “Orientifolds and twisted boundary conditions,”Nucl. Phys. B589 (2000) 440–460,arXiv:hep-th/0004073

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  52. [52]

    Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings and chiral CFTs,

    H. P. De Freitas, “Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings and chiral CFTs,”JHEP11 (2024) 002,arXiv:2402.15562 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Symmetries and dualities in non-supersymmetric CHL strings,

    B. Fraiman and H. Parra de Freitas, “Symmetries and dualities in non-supersymmetric CHL strings,”arXiv:2511.01674 [hep-th]. 29

    work page arXiv