pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22915 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-24 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Heterotic Ouroboros

Chiara Altavista , Salvatore Raucci , Angel M. Uranga , Chuying Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords Heterotic string theoryM-theoryType I' string theoryGauge enhancementBranch cutsNon-supersymmetric stringsString theory quotients
0
0 comments X

The pith

Curling the type I' interval onto itself with a branch cut reproduces the heterotic string spectra and gauge groups from M-theory quotients.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that M-theory on the wedge of two circles, after suitable quotients, produces the ten-dimensional heterotic theories when the type I' interval is curled onto itself so that its two boundaries are separated by a branch cut. Applying the known gauge enhancement rules of type I' string theory to this configuration yields a consistent set of predictions for the light spectra and gauge groups, along with indications of their global structure. A sympathetic reader would care because the construction supplies a single origin for these non-supersymmetric theories and points to possible junctions linking different heterotic models. If the rules work as stated, they imply that the global gauge data and the junctions can be read off directly from the curled geometry.

Core claim

M-theory on S^1 vee S^1 yields, via quotients, ten-dimensional non-supersymmetric string theories. By curling the type I' interval onto itself with its two boundaries separated by a branch cut and using the gauge enhancement mechanism of type I' string theory, one obtains a consistent reproduction of the light spectra and gauge groups of the heterotic theories, including indications of their global structure, together with some evidence for junctions among them.

What carries the argument

The self-curled type I' interval whose two boundaries are separated by a branch cut, which carries the gauge enhancement rules into the heterotic setting.

If this is right

  • The ten-dimensional heterotic theories arise directly from M-theory on S^1 vee S^1 through this curled-interval construction.
  • The global structure of the gauge groups is fixed by the same rules that produce the spectra.
  • Junctions connect different heterotic theories while preserving consistency of the spectra and groups.
  • The light spectra of the heterotic models are reproduced exactly by the gauge-enhanced states on the curled geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The junction evidence suggests the heterotic theories sit in a connected web rather than as isolated models.
  • Similar curled configurations with branch cuts could be tested in other M-theory quotients to derive additional non-supersymmetric spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The gauge enhancement mechanism of type I' string theory can be applied without inconsistencies to the type I' interval curled onto itself with its two boundaries separated by a branch cut.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the massless spectrum or the global structure of the gauge group in the curled construction that fails to match the known heterotic theory data would show the rules are inconsistent.

read the original abstract

M-theory on ${\mathbf{S}}^1\vee{\mathbf{S}}^1$ has recently been proposed to yield, via quotients, ten-dimensional non-supersymmetric string theories. We revisit the construction that leads to the heterotic theories, finding a consistent set of rules that reproduces the light spectra and gauge groups, including indications of their global structure. Our approach uses the gauge enhancement mechanism of type I' string theory, applied to a setting in which the type I' interval is curled onto itself, with its two boundaries separated by a branch cut. Using these tools, we reproduce the ten-dimensional heterotic theories and provide some evidence for junctions among them.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript revisits the M-theory construction on S¹ ∨ S¹ via quotients to obtain ten-dimensional non-supersymmetric heterotic string theories. It applies the gauge enhancement rules of type I' string theory to a type I' interval curled onto itself into a circle, with the two boundaries separated by a branch cut, and claims to identify a consistent set of rules that reproduces the light spectra and gauge groups (including indications of global structure) while providing evidence for junctions among the heterotic theories.

Significance. If the rules are shown to be consistent and to reproduce the known heterotic spectra and global structures without extra massless states or inconsistencies from the branch-cut monodromy, the work would supply a geometric unification of heterotic theories within M-theory, extending type I' ideas to a new compactification setting and offering a framework for understanding transitions between string theories.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and the construction in the main text] The central claim that a consistent set of rules reproduces the heterotic light spectra and gauge groups (including global structure) rests on the assertion that type I' gauge enhancement continues to hold after curling the interval with a branch cut; however, no explicit derivation is given of how the monodromy around the circle acts on Chan-Paton factors or the junction lattice, leaving open the possibility that the resulting spectrum deviates from the known heterotic adjoint representations (e.g., failure to realize Spin(32)/Z₂ versus SO(32)).
  2. [The section describing the curled interval and branch cut] The reproduction of the ten-dimensional heterotic theories requires verification that the non-trivial monodromy maps the two boundaries into each other while preserving open-string junction rules and the absence of tachyons or extra massless states; the manuscript states that it finds 'a consistent set of rules' and 'indications' of global structure but supplies no concrete calculation or table of the resulting spectra or gauge enhancements.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation S¹ ∨ S¹ and the geometry of the branch cut would benefit from an accompanying figure to clarify the identification of the interval into a circle.
  2. A brief comparison table listing the reproduced heterotic gauge groups and their global structures against the standard literature results would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need for greater explicitness in the derivations. We agree that additional details will strengthen the presentation and plan to revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and the construction in the main text] The central claim that a consistent set of rules reproduces the heterotic light spectra and gauge groups (including global structure) rests on the assertion that type I' gauge enhancement continues to hold after curling the interval with a branch cut; however, no explicit derivation is given of how the monodromy around the circle acts on Chan-Paton factors or the junction lattice, leaving open the possibility that the resulting spectrum deviates from the known heterotic adjoint representations (e.g., failure to realize Spin(32)/Z₂ versus SO(32)).

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit derivation of the monodromy action on Chan-Paton factors and the junction lattice is not provided in the current text. The construction relies on the M-theory quotient on S¹ ∨ S¹ to enforce the identifications, combined with type I' enhancement rules applied to the curled interval. To address the concern directly, the revised manuscript will include a dedicated calculation showing how the branch-cut monodromy maps the boundaries while preserving the open-string junction rules. This will explicitly confirm realization of the adjoint representations for both SO(32) and Spin(32)/Z₂ without extra massless states or deviations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [The section describing the curled interval and branch cut] The reproduction of the ten-dimensional heterotic theories requires verification that the non-trivial monodromy maps the two boundaries into each other while preserving open-string junction rules and the absence of tachyons or extra massless states; the manuscript states that it finds 'a consistent set of rules' and 'indications' of global structure but supplies no concrete calculation or table of the resulting spectra or gauge enhancements.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript would be improved by concrete calculations and a summary table. The consistent rules are obtained by combining the type I' gauge enhancement with the branch-cut geometry from the M-theory setup, which we argue reproduces the known heterotic spectra and provides indications of junctions. In the revision we will add an explicit table of the resulting gauge groups, global structures, and light spectra, together with a verification that the monodromy maps the boundaries while preserving junction rules and excluding tachyons or extra states. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: applies established type I' gauge enhancement to new curled-interval geometry as consistency check

full rationale

The paper revisits an M-theory construction on S¹∨S¹ and applies the known gauge enhancement rules from type I' string theory (D8-brane stacks, orientifold projections, SO(2n) and exceptional enhancements) to the interval curled into a circle separated by a branch cut. The abstract states that this yields a consistent set of rules reproducing the light spectra and gauge groups of the ten-dimensional heterotic theories, including indications of global structure. No equations or steps are presented that define a quantity in terms of itself, fit a parameter to data and then rename the fit as a prediction, or rely on a self-citation chain whose only justification is the present work. The reproduction of known heterotic spectra functions as an external benchmark rather than a tautological input. Self-citations to prior M-theory or type I' literature, if present, are not load-bearing for the central claim because the new geometric identification (branch-cut monodromy mapping boundaries) is treated as an independent consistency test. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external heterotic data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract does not specify any free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full text would be needed to identify them.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5402 in / 1141 out tokens · 55047 ms · 2026-05-11T01:48:52.235695+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M-theory onS1∨S1 as Type 0A,

    Z. K. Baykara, E. Dudas, and C. Vafa, “M-theory onS1∨S1 as Type 0A,” arXiv:2603.13468 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    Ho\v{r}ava-Witten theory on ${\mathbf{S}}^1\vee{\mathbf{S}}^1$ as type 0 orientifold

    C. Altavista, E. Anastasi, S. Raucci, A. M. Uranga, and C. Wang, “Hořava-Witten theory onS 1∨S1 as type 0 orientifold,”arXiv:2603.25786 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    A Duality Web for Non-Supersymmetric Strings

    Z. K. Baykara, M. Delgado, E. Dudas, H. P. De Freitas, and C. Vafa, “A Duality Web for Non-Supersymmetric Strings,”arXiv:2604.07433 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking,” arXiv:1711.11494 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  5. [5]

    Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua: Brane dynamics, bubbles and the swampland,

    I. Basile, “Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua: Brane dynamics, bubbles and the swampland,”Riv. Nuovo Cim.44no. 10, (2021) 499–596, arXiv:2107.02814 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Angelantonj and I

    C. Angelantonj and I. Florakis,A Lightning Introduction to String Theory. Handbook of Quantum Gravity, 2024.arXiv:2406.09508 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Raucci,Spacetime aspects of non-supersymmetric strings

    S. Raucci,Spacetime aspects of non-supersymmetric strings. PhD thesis, Scuola Normale Superiore, 9, 2024.arXiv:2409.19395 [hep-th]. 32

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry

    G. Leone and S. Raucci, “Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry,” Riv. Nuovo Cim.(2026),arXiv:2509.24703 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Supersymmetry breaking with fields, strings and branes,

    E. Dudas, J. Mourad, and A. Sagnotti, “Supersymmetry breaking with fields, strings and branes,”Phys. Rept.1175(2026) 1–256,arXiv:2511.04367 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, P. H. Ginsparg, G. W. Moore, and C. Vafa, “An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String,”Phys. Lett. B171(1986) 155–162

    work page 1986

  11. [11]

    String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry,

    L. J. Dixon and J. A. Harvey, “String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry,”Nucl. Phys. B274(1986) 93–105

    work page 1986

  12. [12]

    Classification of Closed Fermionic String Models,

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S. H. H. Tye, “Classification of Closed Fermionic String Models,”Phys. Rev. D34(1986) 3794

    work page 1986

  13. [13]

    Classification of chiral fermionic CFTs of central charge≤16,

    P. Boyle Smith, Y.-H. Lin, Y. Tachikawa, and Y. Zheng, “Classification of chiral fermionic CFTs of central charge≤16,”SciPost Phys.16no. 2, (2024) 058, arXiv:2303.16917 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Fraiman, M

    B. Fraiman, M. Graña, H. Parra De Freitas, and S. Sethi, “Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on a circle,”JHEP12(2024) 082,arXiv:2307.13745 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Basile, A

    I. Basile, A. Debray, M. Delgado, and M. Montero, “Global anomalies & bordism of non-supersymmetric strings,”JHEP02(2024) 092,arXiv:2310.06895 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Duality without Supersymmetry: The Case of the SO(16)xSO(16) String

    J. D. Blum and K. R. Dienes, “Duality without supersymmetry: The Case of the SO(16) x SO(16) string,”Phys. Lett. B414(1997) 260–268,arXiv:hep-th/9707148

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  17. [17]

    Strong/Weak Coupling Duality Relations for Non-Supersymmetric String Theories

    J. D. Blum and K. R. Dienes, “Strong / weak coupling duality relations for nonsupersymmetric string theories,”Nucl. Phys. B516(1998) 83–159, arXiv:hep-th/9707160

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  18. [18]

    A Note on Orientifolds and Dualities of Type 0B String Theory

    R. Blumenhagen and A. Kumar, “A Note on orientifolds and dualities of type 0B string theory,”Phys. Lett. B464(1999) 46–52,arXiv:hep-th/9906234

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  19. [19]

    On the Low Energy Spectra of the Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic String Theories,

    A. E. Faraggi and M. Tsulaia, “On the Low Energy Spectra of the Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic String Theories,”Eur. Phys. J. C54(2008) 495–500, arXiv:0706.1649 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Heterotic strings onT 3/Z2, Nikulin involutions and M-theory,

    B. S. Acharya, G. Aldazabal, A. Font, K. Narain, and I. G. Zadeh, “Heterotic strings onT 3/Z2, Nikulin involutions and M-theory,”JHEP09(2022) 209, arXiv:2205.09764 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Symmetries and dualities in non-supersymmetric CHL strings,

    B. Fraiman and H. Parra de Freitas, “Symmetries and dualities in non-supersymmetric CHL strings,”arXiv:2511.01674 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    The Art of Branching: Cobordism Junctions of 10d String Theories

    C. Altavista, E. Anastasi, R. Angius, and A. M. Uranga, “The Art of Branching: Cobordism Junctions of 10d String Theories,”arXiv:2603.24667 [hep-th]. 33

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Tachikawa,On the trivalent junction of three non-tachyonic heterotic string theories,arXiv:2603.28133

    Y. Tachikawa, “On the trivalent junction of three non-tachyonic heterotic string theories,”arXiv:2603.28133 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Casimir Effect Between World-Branes in Heterotic M-Theory

    M. Fabinger and P. Horava, “Casimir effect between world branes in heterotic M theory,”Nucl. Phys. B580(2000) 243–263,arXiv:hep-th/0002073

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  25. [25]

    Supersymmetry breaking, open strings and M theory,

    I. Antoniadis, E. Dudas, and A. Sagnotti, “Supersymmetry breaking, open strings and M theory,”Nucl. Phys. B544(1999) 469–502,arXiv:hep-th/9807011

    work page arXiv 1999

  26. [26]

    Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics,

    N. Seiberg, “Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics,”Phys. Lett. B388(1996) 753–760,arXiv:hep-th/9608111

    work page arXiv 1996

  27. [27]

    (8,0) quantum mechanics and symmetry enhancement in type I’ superstrings,

    C. P. Bachas, M. B. Green, and A. Schwimmer, “(8,0) quantum mechanics and symmetry enhancement in type I’ superstrings,”JHEP01(1998) 006, arXiv:hep-th/9712086

    work page arXiv 1998

  28. [28]

    Extremal transitions and five-dimensional supersymmetric field theories,

    D. R. Morrison and N. Seiberg, “Extremal transitions and five-dimensional supersymmetric field theories,”Nucl. Phys. B483(1997) 229–247, arXiv:hep-th/9609070

    work page arXiv 1997

  29. [29]

    Five-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories and degenerations of Calabi-Yau spaces,

    K. A. Intriligator, D. R. Morrison, and N. Seiberg, “Five-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories and degenerations of Calabi-Yau spaces,”Nucl. Phys. B497(1997) 56–100,arXiv:hep-th/9702198

    work page arXiv 1997

  30. [30]

    Branes, Superpotentials and Superconformal Fixed Points

    O. Aharony and A. Hanany, “Branes, superpotentials and superconformal fixed points,”Nucl. Phys. B504(1997) 239–271,arXiv:hep-th/9704170

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  31. [31]

    Webs of (p,q) 5-branes, Five Dimensional Field Theories and Grid Diagrams

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany, and B. Kol, “Webs of (p,q) five-branes, five-dimensional field theories and grid diagrams,”JHEP01(1998) 002,arXiv:hep-th/9710116

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  32. [32]

    D-brane instantons and K theory charges,

    J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, and N. Seiberg, “D-brane instantons and K theory charges,”JHEP11(2001) 062,arXiv:hep-th/0108100

    work page arXiv 2001

  33. [33]

    NonBPS states and Branes in string theory,

    A. Sen, “NonBPS states and Branes in string theory,” inAdvanced School on Supersymmetry in the Theories of Fields, Strings and Branes, pp. 187–234. 1, 1999. arXiv:hep-th/9904207

    work page arXiv 1999

  34. [34]

    Dynamical Cobordisms in General Relativity and String Theory

    S. Hellerman and M. Kleban, “Dynamical Cobordisms in General Relativity and String Theory,”JHEP02(2011) 022,arXiv:1009.3277 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa, “Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,” arXiv:1909.10355 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1909

  36. [36]

    Heterotic and Type I String Dynamics from Eleven Dimensions

    P. Horava and E. Witten, “Heterotic and Type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 506–524,arXiv:hep-th/9510209

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  37. [37]

    Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity on a Manifold with Boundary

    P. Horava and E. Witten, “Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary,”Nucl. Phys. B475(1996) 94–114,arXiv:hep-th/9603142. 34

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  38. [38]

    Evidence for Heterotic - Type I String Duality

    J. Polchinski and E. Witten, “Evidence for heterotic - type I string duality,”Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 525–540,arXiv:hep-th/9510169

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  39. [39]

    Buratti, M

    G. Buratti, M. Delgado, and A. M. Uranga, “Dynamical tadpoles, stringy cobordism, and the SM from spontaneous compactification,”JHEP06(2021) 170, arXiv:2104.02091 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Buratti, J

    G. Buratti, J. Calderón-Infante, M. Delgado, and A. M. Uranga, “Dynamical Cobordism and Swampland Distance Conjectures,”JHEP10(2021) 037, arXiv:2107.09098 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Angius, J

    R. Angius, J. Calderón-Infante, M. Delgado, J. Huertas, and A. M. Uranga, “At the end of the world: Local Dynamical Cobordism,”JHEP06(2022) 142, arXiv:2203.11240 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Blumenhagen, N

    R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, C. Kneissl, and A. Makridou, “Dynamical Cobordism of a Domain Wall and its Companion Defect 7-brane,”arXiv:2205.09782 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Angius, M

    R. Angius, M. Delgado, and A. M. Uranga, “Dynamical Cobordism and the beginning of time: supercritical strings and tachyon condensation,”JHEP08(2022) 285,arXiv:2207.13108 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Angius, J

    R. Angius, J. Huertas, and A. M. Uranga, “Small black hole explosions,”JHEP06 (2023) 070,arXiv:2303.15903 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Blumenhagen, C

    R. Blumenhagen, C. Kneissl, and C. Wang, “Dynamical Cobordism Conjecture: Solutions for End-of-the-World Branes,”arXiv:2303.03423 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Angius, A

    R. Angius, A. Makridou, and A. M. Uranga, “Intersecting end of the world branes,” JHEP03(2024) 110,arXiv:2312.16286 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Angius,End of The World brane networks for infinite distance limits in CY moduli space, 2404.14486

    R. Angius, “End of The World brane networks for infinite distance limits in CY moduli space,”arXiv:2404.14486 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Delgado,The bubble of nothing under T-duality,JHEP05(2024) 333, [arXiv:2312.09291]

    M. Delgado, “The bubble of nothing under T-duality,”JHEP05(2024) 333, arXiv:2312.09291 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Antonelli and I

    R. Antonelli and I. Basile, “Brane annihilation in non-supersymmetric strings,” JHEP11(2019) 021,arXiv:1908.04352 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    GSO Defects: IIA/IIB Walls and the Surprisingly StableR7-Brane,

    J. J. Heckman, J. McNamara, J. Parra-Martinez, and E. Torres, “GSO Defects: IIA/IIB Walls and the Surprisingly StableR7-Brane,”arXiv:2507.21210 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Anastasi, M

    E. Anastasi, M. Montero, A. M. Uranga, and C. Wang, “What IIB looks IIA string: String Cobordisms via Non-Compact CFTs,”arXiv:2603.00225 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    Torres,A Matrix Theory Construction of the IIA/IIB Wall,arXiv:2603.02199

    E. Torres, “A Matrix Theory Construction of the IIA/IIB Wall,”arXiv:2603.02199 [hep-th]. 35

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    A Note On Some Minimally Supersymmetric Models In Two Dimensions

    D. Gaiotto, T. Johnson-Freyd, and E. Witten, “A note on some minimally supersymmetric models in two dimensions.,” arxiv preprint 1902.10249, 2021

    work page Pith review arXiv 1902

  54. [54]

    Angius, A

    R. Angius, A. M. Uranga, and C. Wang, “End of the world boundaries for chiral quantum gravity theories,”JHEP03(2025) 064,arXiv:2410.07322 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Gapped Chiral Fermions,

    S. S. Razamat and D. Tong, “Gapped Chiral Fermions,”arXiv:2009.05037 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2009

  56. [56]

    Tong,Comments on symmetric mass generation in 2d and 4d,JHEP07(2022) 001 [2104.03997]

    D. Tong, “Comments on symmetric mass generation in 2d and 4d,”JHEP07(2022) 001,arXiv:2104.03997 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Wang and Y.-Z

    J. Wang and Y.-Z. You, “Symmetric Mass Generation,”Symmetry14no. 7, (2022) 1475,arXiv:2204.14271 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Tachikawa and H

    Y. Tachikawa and H. Y. Zhang, “On aZ3-valued discrete topological term in 10d heterotic string theories,”SciPost Phys.17no. 3, (2024) 077,arXiv:2403.08861 [hep-th]. 36

    work page arXiv 2024