Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 142 references

EuraGovExam packs over 8,000 real civil-service exam questions into single images and shows that even leading vision-language models reach only about 86 percent accuracy.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 17:06 UTC pith:SDJDJZKK

load-bearing objection Abstract pitches a useful real-exam VLM benchmark, but the supplied full text is an unrelated GRB afterglow paper, so none of the claims can be checked. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.27223 v2 pith:SDJDJZKK submitted 2026-03-28 cs.CV cs.AI

EuraGovExam: A Multilingual Multimodal Benchmark from Real-World Civil Service Exams

Jaeseong Kim , Chaehwan Lim , Sang Hyun Gil , Suan Lee This is my paper
classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords vision-language modelsmultimodal benchmarkcivil service examsdocument understandingmultilingual OCRlayout-aware reasoninge-governancehigh-stakes evaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces EuraGovExam, a benchmark built from authentic civil-service examinations drawn from South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, India, and the European Union. It contains more than 8,000 high-resolution scanned multiple-choice items spanning 17 academic and administrative domains. Every question—including text, choices, tables, and other visual elements—is presented as one image with only a minimal formatting instruction, forcing models to perform layout-aware, cross-lingual reasoning directly from pixels. State-of-the-art vision-language models top out near 86 percent accuracy, revealing systematic weaknesses in high-stakes, culturally varied, image-grounded document understanding. The resource is intended both as a diagnostic for current models and as a practical foundation for e-governance and equitable exam tools.

Core claim

Real civil-service exams from five Eurasian regions, when rendered as single images that contain the entire problem and require only a standardized answer format, form a stringent test of vision-language models; even the best systems achieve only roughly 86 percent accuracy and thereby expose concrete limits in layout parsing, multilingual typography, and culturally grounded reasoning.

What carries the argument

The single-image protocol: every item embeds problem statement, answer choices, and visual elements inside one high-resolution scan, accompanied solely by a minimal standardized instruction for answer formatting. This design eliminates external text and forces end-to-end visual-linguistic processing.

Load-bearing premise

That an 86 percent accuracy ceiling on this particular set of scanned multiple-choice exams under the single-image minimal-instruction setup reliably diagnoses general vision-language-model shortcomings rather than reflecting OCR artifacts, answer-key noise, or the specific sampling of domains and languages.

What would settle it

A controlled re-evaluation in which the identical questions are supplied as clean, machine-readable text (or as images with perfect OCR) and the same models then exceed 95 percent accuracy would show that the reported difficulty is largely an artifact of scanning and layout rather than of deeper reasoning limits.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Model developers gain a public, culturally diverse testbed that stresses layout, typography, and cross-lingual document understanding under realistic public-sector constraints.
  • E-governance and automated exam-grading systems can use the same items to quantify and improve handling of authentic scanned forms and multilingual tables.
  • Future VLM training or fine-tuning regimes that close the gap to human-level performance on EuraGovExam would demonstrate progress on high-stakes image-grounded reasoning.
  • The 17-domain, five-region composition supplies a ready template for constructing parallel benchmarks in additional languages or administrative traditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the benchmark preserves original exam layouts, residual model errors are likely to cluster around table reading, multi-column parsing, and mixed-script typography—suggesting targeted pre-training on form-like documents could yield outsized gains.
  • The cultural and linguistic spread implies that gains measured solely on English-centric VQA suites may overstate readiness for real public-sector deployment outside those languages.
  • If the 86 percent ceiling persists after stronger OCR pipelines are applied, the residual gap would isolate genuine multi-hop and domain-knowledge failures rather than pure perception failures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission abstract presents EuraGovExam as a new multilingual multimodal VLM benchmark of >8,000 high-resolution scanned multiple-choice items drawn from real civil-service exams in South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, India, and the EU, spanning 17 domains. Items are rendered as single images containing the full question, choices, and visual elements, with only a minimal answer-format instruction, so that models must perform layout-aware, cross-lingual reasoning from pixels. The abstract reports that even state-of-the-art VLMs reach only ~86% accuracy and claims the resource sets a new standard for high-stakes, culturally realistic evaluation. The body of the supplied manuscript, however, is an unrelated astrophysics paper on forward- and reverse-shock afterglow emission from two-component GRB jets modeled with VegasAfterglow; none of the claimed dataset construction, annotation, leakage controls, model list, scoring protocol, or error analysis for EuraGovExam appears.

Significance. A carefully constructed, single-image, real-exam benchmark covering multiple Eurasian languages and administrative domains would be a valuable diagnostic for layout, OCR, and cross-lingual reasoning limits of current VLMs and would have clear applications in e-governance and exam preparation. Because the full methods, data, and results for EuraGovExam are absent from the supplied manuscript, that potential significance cannot be evaluated or credited.

major comments (3)
  1. The full manuscript text supplied under paper_id 2603.27223 is the unrelated GRB afterglow study (VegasAfterglow, ISM/wind FS/RS light curves, arXiv:2603.27225). No sections, tables, figures, or appendices describe EuraGovExam dataset construction, answer-key provenance, OCR/layout pipeline, train/test splits, leakage controls, model list, prompting protocol, or the 86% SOTA result. The central empirical claim therefore cannot be verified from the materials provided.
  2. Abstract claim that SOTA VLMs achieve only 86% accuracy and thereby diagnose genuine layout/cross-lingual limits: without the evaluation section, model list, scoring rules, or error analysis (OCR vs. reasoning failures), it is impossible to determine whether the figure is an artifact of scan quality, answer-key errors, domain sampling, or prompt format. This is load-bearing for the 'new standard' assertion.
  3. Abstract design claim that every item is a single image with only minimal formatting instructions: the manuscript contains no protocol, example images, or ablation showing that performance is limited by layout-aware reasoning rather than ordinary OCR or language coverage. The diagnostic power of the benchmark therefore remains unsubstantiated.
minor comments (2)
  1. Title, abstract, and arXiv identifier (2603.27223, cs.CV) do not match the body text (astro-ph.HE GRB afterglow paper). This metadata mismatch must be resolved before any scientific review can proceed.
  2. If the intended EuraGovExam manuscript exists, it should be supplied in full so that dataset statistics, annotation quality, and evaluation tables can be examined.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: self-contained numerical parameter study of two-component jet afterglows with independent analytical scalings.

full rationale

The manuscript is a systematic exploration of forward- and reverse-shock afterglow light curves from two-component (core+wing) jets using the external VegasAfterglow code plus newly derived analytical scalings (Appendix A). Parameters (energies, Lorentz factors, opening angles, engine duration, density profiles) are varied one-at-a-time from a stated default table; resulting multi-band light curves and critical frequencies are reported and compared to the independent scalings. No quantity is fitted to data and then re-presented as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation to force the central claims; the derivations of pre-peak slopes, peak-time ratios R(t_peak), peak-flux ratios R(F_ u,peak), and Doppler corrections a( heta) stand on standard blast-wave hydrodynamics and synchrotron formulae that do not presuppose the numerical outcomes. The paper therefore contains no self-definitional loops, fitted-input-as-prediction steps, or load-bearing self-citation chains. Score 0 is the correct, expected outcome for this class of modeling paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review of a dataset paper. Load-bearing premises are domain assumptions about what makes a VLM benchmark diagnostic (single-image embedding, real exam provenance, multilingual coverage) plus uninspectable empirical claims (size, accuracy numbers). No free parameters in the physics sense; no invented physical entities. Free 'parameters' here are design choices that define the benchmark rather than fitted constants.

free parameters (2)
  • Reported SOTA accuracy (~86%)
    Headline difficulty claim depends on this measured number; models, prompts, and scoring rules are not inspectable from the abstract alone.
  • Dataset size and domain mix (8,000+ items, 17 domains, 5 regions)
    Composition choices determine what the benchmark measures; sampling and filtering criteria are not available in the provided text.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Embedding full question content in a single image with only minimal answer-format instructions is a valid and superior stress test of layout-aware cross-lingual VLM reasoning versus text-extracted or multi-channel setups.
    Core design premise of the benchmark; stated in the abstract as the distinguishing feature.
  • domain assumption Real civil-service exam documents from KR/JP/TW/IN/EU are representative high-stakes public-sector assessments for evaluating cultural realism and linguistic diversity.
    Justifies geographic and institutional sampling as establishing a 'new standard.'
  • ad hoc to paper Multiple-choice accuracy on this set diagnoses general limitations of current VLMs in multilingual image-grounded settings.
    Extrapolation from one exam-style MCQ distribution to broad VLM capability claims.
invented entities (1)
  • EuraGovExam benchmark no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide a real-world, single-image, multilingual civil-service exam testbed for VLMs and related applications.
    The paper's primary contribution is this named dataset/protocol; independent evidence would be public release and third-party reuse, not shown in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 47682 in / 2611 out tokens · 31876 ms · 2026-07-13T17:06:38.280283+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present EuraGovExam, a multilingual and multimodal benchmark sourced from real-world civil service examinations across five representative Eurasian regions: South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, India, and the European Union. Designed to reflect the authentic complexity of public-sector assessments, the dataset contains over 8,000 high-resolution scanned multiple-choice questions covering 17 diverse academic and administrative domains. Unlike existing benchmarks, EuraGovExam embeds all question content--including problem statements, answer choices, and visual elements--within a single image, providing only a minimal standardized instruction for answer formatting. This design demands that models perform layout-aware, cross-lingual reasoning directly from visual input. All items are drawn from real exam documents, preserving rich visual structures such as tables, multilingual typography, and form-like layouts. Evaluation results show that even state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) achieve only 86% accuracy, underscoring the benchmark's difficulty and its power to diagnose the limitations of current models. By emphasizing cultural realism, visual complexity, and linguistic diversity, EuraGovExam establishes a new standard for evaluating VLMs in high-stakes, multilingual, image-grounded settings. It also supports practical applications in e-governance, public-sector document analysis, and equitable exam preparation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 100 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    (A10) becomes Rs < R∆ < RΓ < R N ,(A11) which means that the reverse shock crosses the shell be- fore the deceleration begins [109]

    ISM: Thin-Shell FS In the thin-shell regime, the ordering of the radii in Eq. (A10) becomes Rs < R∆ < RΓ < R N ,(A11) which means that the reverse shock crosses the shell be- fore the deceleration begins [109]. Consequently, the Lorentz factor stays constant untilt dec, after which it decays as follows: Γ∝ ( Γ0, t < t dec E1/8t−3/8, t > t dec ,(A12) where...

  2. [2]

    After that, the shocked ejecta gradually adjusts to the BM solution

    ISM: Thin-Shell RS The blastwave dynamics is the same as in the thin-shell FS case during the shock-crossing phase. After that, the shocked ejecta gradually adjusts to the BM solution. The analytical expressions detailed below represent the standard scaling laws for thin-shell RS emission, derived under the assumption that the shock reaches mildly relativ...

  3. [3]

    (A10) are or- dered in reverse [6]: Rs > R∆ > RΓ > R N .(A35) The reverse shock becomes relativistic early, which causes the blastwave to decelerate during the shock-crossing phase

    ISM: Thick-Shell FS In the thick-shell case, the radii in Eq. (A10) are or- dered in reverse [6]: Rs > R∆ > RΓ > R N .(A35) The reverse shock becomes relativistic early, which causes the blastwave to decelerate during the shock-crossing phase. The deceleration radiusR Γ is no longer relevant. The blastwave decelerates as Γ∝ ( Γ0ξ3/4 0 t−1/4, t < t × E1/8 ...

  4. [4]

    ISM: Thick-Shell RS In this case, the RS becomes relativistic early. The blastwave decelerates as γ3 ∼ Γ0ξ3/4 0√ 2 × ( (t/t×)−1/4, t < t × (t/t×)−7/16, t > t × ,(A47) The scalings laws for the thick-shell RS are given as Fν,max ∝E 5/4 ISOΓ−1 0 × ( t−5/4 × t1/2, t < t × t11/48 × t−47/48, t > t × ,(A48) νm ∝Γ 2 0 × ( 1, t < t × t73/48 × t−73/48, t > t × ,(A...

  5. [5]

    Since the algebra is analogous, we do not repeat it here

    Wind The derivations in a wind-like medium follows the same procedure as in the ISM case: one combines the dynami- cal evolution of the shocked regions with the time depen- dence of the critical frequencies to obtain the flux scalings in a particular spectram segment of interest. Since the algebra is analogous, we do not repeat it here. Instead, we summar...

  6. [6]

    M. J. Rees and P. Meszaros, Relativistic fireballs - Energy conversion and time-scales., MNRAS258, 41 (1992)

    1992

  7. [7]

    Piran, Gamma-ray bursts and the fireball model, Phys

    T. Piran, Gamma-ray bursts and the fireball model, Phys. Rep.314, 575 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9810256 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  8. [8]

    M. J. Rees and P. Meszaros, Unsteady Outflow Mod- els for Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts, ApJ430, L93 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9404038 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  9. [9]

    Kobayashi, T

    S. Kobayashi, T. Piran, and R. Sari, Can Internal Shocks Produce the Variability in Gamma-Ray Bursts?, ApJ490, 92 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9705013 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  10. [10]

    Piran, The physics of gamma-ray bursts, Re- views of Modern Physics76, 1143 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0405503 [astro-ph]

    T. Piran, The physics of gamma-ray bursts, Re- views of Modern Physics76, 1143 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0405503 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2004

  11. [11]

    Sari and T

    R. Sari and T. Piran, Hydrodynamic Timescales and Temporal Structure of Gamma-Ray Bursts, ApJ455, L143 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9508081 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  12. [12]

    Meszaros and M

    P. Meszaros and M. J. Rees, Relativistic Fireballs and Their Impact on External Matter: Models for Cosmo- logical Gamma-Ray Bursts, ApJ405, 278 (1993)

    1993

  13. [13]

    Kobayashi, T

    S. Kobayashi, T. Piran, and R. Sari, Hydrodynamics of a Relativistic Fireball: The Complete Evolution, ApJ 513, 669 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9803217 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  14. [14]

    M´ esz´ aros and M

    P. M´ esz´ aros and M. J. Rees, Optical and Long- Wavelength Afterglow from Gamma-Ray Bursts, ApJ 476, 232 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9606043 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  15. [15]

    R. Sari, T. Piran, and R. Narayan, Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows, ApJ497, L17 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9712005 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  16. [16]

    Sari and T

    R. Sari and T. Piran, Predictions for the Very Early Afterglow and the Optical Flash, ApJ520, 641 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901338 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  17. [17]

    Zhang, S

    B. Zhang, S. Kobayashi, and P. M´ esz´ aros, Gamma-Ray Burst Early Optical Afterglows: Implications for the Initial Lorentz Factor and the Central Engine, ApJ595, 950 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302525 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  18. [18]

    Zhang, Y

    B. Zhang, Y. Z. Fan, J. Dyks, S. Kobayashi, 25 P. M´ esz´ aros, D. N. Burrows, J. A. Nousek, and N. Gehrels, Physical Processes Shaping Gamma-Ray Burst X-Ray Afterglow Light Curves: Theoretical Im- plications from the Swift X-Ray Telescope Observations, ApJ642, 354 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0508321 [astro- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  19. [19]

    Lipunov, V

    V. Lipunov, V. Kornilov, E. Gorbovskoy, N. Shatskij, D. Kuvshinov, N. Tyurina, A. Belinski, A. Krylov, P. Balanutsa, V. Chazov, A. Kuznetsov, P. Kortunov, A. Sankovich, A. Tlatov, A. Parkhomenko, V. Krushin- sky, I. Zalozhnyh, A. Popov, T. Kopytova, K. Ivanov, S. Yazev, and V. Yurkov, Master Robotic Net, Advances in Astronomy2010, 349171 (2010), arXiv:090...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    A. Burd, M. Cwiok, H. Czyrkowski, R. Dabrowski, W. Dominik, M. Grajda, M. Husejko, M. Jegier, A. Kalicki, G. Kasprowicz, K. Kierzkowski, K. Krupska, K. Kwiecinska, L. Mankiewicz, K. Nawrocki, B. Pilecki, L. W. Piotrowski, K. Pozniak, R. Romaniuk, R. Salan- ski, M. Sokolowski, D. Szczygiel, G. Wrochna, and W. Zabolotny, Pi of the Sky - all-sky, real-time s...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  21. [21]

    W. T. Vestrand, J. A. Wren, P. R. Wozniak, R. Aptekar, S. Golentskii, V. Pal’Shin, T. Sakamoto, R. R. White, S. Evans, D. Casperson, and E. Fenimore, Energy in- put and response from prompt and early optical after- glow emission inγ-ray bursts, Nature442, 172 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0605472 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  22. [22]

    Klotz, M

    A. Klotz, M. Bo¨ er, J. L. Atteia, and B. Gendre, Early Optical Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts by the TAROT Telescopes: Period 2001-2008, AJ137, 4100 (2009), arXiv:0902.0898 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  23. [23]

    Komesh, B

    T. Komesh, B. Grossan, Z. Maksut, E. Abdikamalov, M. Krugov, and G. F. Smoot, Evolution of the after- glow optical spectral shape of GRB 201015A in the first hour: evidence for dust destruction, MNRAS520, 6104 (2023), arXiv:2211.03029 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Abdullayev, T

    Z. Abdullayev, T. Komesh, B. Grossan, E. Abdika- malov, Z. Maksut, M. Krugov, S. Myrzakul, D. Tu- iakbayeva, and A. Kostangeldinova, Early-Time Opti- cal Spectral Shape Measurements of GRB 200925B,Re- vista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series,59, 109 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Akerlof, R

    C. Akerlof, R. Balsano, S. Barthelmy, J. Bloch, P. But- terworth, D. Casperson, T. Cline, S. Fletcher, F. Fron- tera, G. Gisler, J. Heise, J. Hills, R. Kehoe, B. Lee, S. Marshall, T. McKay, R. Miller, L. Piro, W. Pried- horsky, J. Szymanski, and J. Wren, Observation of con- temporaneous optical radiation from aγ-ray burst, Na- ture398, 400 (1999), arXiv:a...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  26. [26]

    J. Wei, B. Cordier, S. Antier, P. Antilogus, J. L. At- teia, A. Bajat, S. Basa, V. Beckmann, M. G. Bernar- dini, S. Boissier, L. Bouchet, V. Burwitz, A. Claret, Z. G. Dai, F. Daigne, J. Deng, D. Dornic, H. Feng, T. Foglizzo, H. Gao, N. Gehrels, O. Godet, A. Gold- wurm, F. Gonzalez, L. Gosset, D. G¨ otz, C. Gouiffes, F. Grise, A. Gros, J. Guilet, X. Han, M...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    W. Yuan, C. Zhang, Y. Chen, and Z. Ling, The Einstein Probe Mission, inHandbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, edited by C. Bambi and A. Sangangelo (2022) p. 86

    2022

  28. [28]

    J. A. Nousek, C. Kouveliotou, D. Grupe, K. L. Page, J. Granot, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, S. K. Patel, D. N. Burrows, V. Mangano, S. Barthelmy, A. P. Beardmore, S. Cam- pana, M. Capalbi, G. Chincarini, G. Cusumano, A. D. Falcone, N. Gehrels, P. Giommi, M. R. Goad, O. Godet, C. P. Hurkett, J. A. Kennea, A. Moretti, P. T. O’Brien, J. P. Osborne, P. Romano, G. Tagliaf...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  29. [29]

    X.-G. Wang, B. Zhang, E.-W. Liang, H. Gao, L. Li, C.- M. Deng, S.-M. Qin, Q.-W. Tang, D. A. Kann, F. Ryde, and P. Kumar, How Bad or Good Are the External For- ward Shock Afterglow Models of Gamma-Ray Bursts?, ApJS219, 9 (2015), arXiv:1503.03193 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    S.-X. Yi, M. Du, and T. Liu, Statistical Analyses of the Energies of X-Ray Plateaus and Flares in Gamma-Ray Bursts, ApJ924, 69 (2022), arXiv:2111.01041 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Busmann, B

    M. Busmann, B. O’Connor, J. Sommer, D. Gruen, P. Beniamini, R. Gill, M. J. Moss, A. Palmese, A. Riffeser, Y.-H. Yang, E. Troja, S. Dichiara, R. Ricci, N. Klingler, C. G¨ ossl, L. Hu, A. Rau, C. Ries, G. Ryan, M. Schmidt, M. Yadav, and G. R. Zeimann, The cu- rious case of EP241021a: Unraveling the mystery of its exceptional rebrightening, A&A701, A225 (202...

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    D. Akl, S. Antier, H. Koehn, P. T. H. Pang, J. J. Geng, R. Gill, E. Abdikamalov, C. Adami, V. Aivazyan, L. Almeida, S. Alshamsi, C. Andrade, Q. Andr´ e, C. Angulo-Valdez, J.-L. Atteia, K. Barkaoui, S. Basa, R. L. Becerra, P. Bendjoya, D. Berdikhan, E. Bernaud, S. Boissier, S. Brunier, A. Y. Burdanov, N. R. Butler, J. Chen, F. Colas, W. Corradi, M. W. Coug...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Liang, L

    E.-W. Liang, L. Li, H. Gao, B. Zhang, Y.-F. Liang, X.- F. Wu, S.-X. Yi, Z.-G. Dai, Q.-W. Tang, J.-M. Chen, H.-J. L¨ u, J. Zhang, R.-J. Lu, L.-Z. L¨ u, and J.-Y. Wei, A comprehensive study of gamma-ray burst optical emis- sion. ii. afterglow onset and late re-brightening compo- nents, The Astrophysical Journal774, 13 (2013)

    2013

  34. [34]

    Nardini, J

    M. Nardini, J. Greiner, T. Kr¨ uhler, S. Klose, R. Filgas, A. Nicuesa Guelbenzu, F. Olivares, A. Rau, A. Rossi, A. Updike, J. Elliott, P. Afonso, and C. Clemens, After- glow rebrightenings as a signature of a long-lasting cen- tral engine: the case of grb 100814a, Astronomy & As- trophysics562, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321525 (2014)

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321525 2014

  35. [35]

    Sari and P

    R. Sari and P. M´ esz´ aros, Impulsive and Varying Injec- tion in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows, ApJ535, L33 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0003406 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  36. [36]

    Zhang and P

    B. Zhang and P. M´ esz´ aros, Gamma-Ray Bursts with Continuous Energy Injection and Their Afterglow Sig- nature, ApJ566, 712 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0108402 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  37. [37]

    Panaitescu, P

    A. Panaitescu, P. M´ esz´ aros, N. Gehrels, D. Bur- rows, and J. Nousek, Analysis of the X-ray emission of nine Swift afterglows, MNRAS366, 1357 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0508340 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    Laskar, E

    T. Laskar, E. Berger, R. Margutti, D. Perley, B. A. Zauderer, R. Sari, and W.-f. Fong, Energy Injection in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows, ApJ814, 1 (2015), arXiv:1504.03702 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    Angulo-Valdez, R

    C. Angulo-Valdez, R. L. Becerra, R. Gill, N. Globus, W. H. Lee, D. L´ opez-C´ amara, C. Mihalenko, E. M. M´ endez, R. Ricci, K. Siellez, A. M. Watson, M. Yadav, Y.-H. Yang, D. Akl, S. Antier, J.-L. Atteia, S. Basa, N. R. Butler, S. Dichiara, D. Dornic, J.-G. Ducoin, F. Fortin, L. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, K. O. L´ opez, F. Mag- nani, B. O’Connor, M. Pereyra, N. ...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stag184 2026

  40. [40]

    Z. G. Dai and T. Lu, Hydrodynamics of Relativistic Blast Waves in a Density-Jump Medium and Their Emission Signature, ApJ565, L87 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0111454 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2002

  41. [41]

    Ren, X.-Y

    J. Ren, X.-Y. Li, Y. Wang, L.-L. Zhang, D.-M. Wei, Z.-G. Dai, Z.-P. Jin, and D.-B. Lin, Stellar Wind- Blown Bubbles as Environments for Late-Time Re- brightening of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.22891 (2025), arXiv:2510.22891 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Nakar and J

    E. Nakar and J. Granot, Smooth light curves from a bumpy ride: relativistic blast wave encounters a density jump, MNRAS380, 1744 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0606011 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2007

  43. [43]

    Filgas, J

    R. Filgas, J. Greiner, P. Schady, T. Kr¨ uhler, A. C. Updike, S. Klose, M. Nardini, D. A. Kann, A. Rossi, V. Sudilovsky, P. M. J. Afonso, C. Clemens, J. Elliott, A. Nicuesa Guelbenzu, F. Olivares E., and A. Rau, GRB 091127: The cooling break race on magnetic fuel, A&A 535, A57 (2011), arXiv:1109.2810 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    Panaitescu, P

    A. Panaitescu, P. M´ esz´ aros, D. Burrows, J. Nousek, N. Gehrels, P. O’Brien, and R. Willingale, Evidence for chromatic X-ray light-curve breaks in Swift gamma-ray burst afterglows and their theoretical implications, MN- RAS369, 2059 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0604105 [astro- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2059

  45. [45]

    Misra, L

    K. Misra, L. Resmi, D. A. Kann, M. Marongiu, A. Moin, S. Klose, G. Bernardi, A. de Ugarte Postigo, V. K. Jaiswal, S. Schulze, D. A. Perley, A. Ghosh, Dimple, H. Kumar, R. Gupta, M. J. Micha lowski, S. Mart´ ın, A. Cockeram, S. V. Cherukuri, V. Bhalerao, G. E. An- derson, S. B. Pandey, G. C. Anupama, C. C. Th¨ one, S. Barway, M. H. Wieringa, J. P. U. Fynbo...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    G. P. Lamb and S. Kobayashi, Electromagnetic counter- parts to structured jets from gravitational wave detected mergers, MNRAS472, 4953 (2017), arXiv:1706.03000 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    Beniamini, R

    P. Beniamini, R. Gill, and J. Granot, Robust features of off-axis gamma-ray burst afterglow light curves, MN- RAS515, 555 (2022), arXiv:2204.06008 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    O’Connor, E

    B. O’Connor, E. Troja, G. Ryan, P. Beniamini, H. van Eerten, J. Granot, S. Dichiara, R. Ricci, V. Lipunov, J. H. Gillanders, R. Gill, M. Moss, S. Anand, I. An- dreoni, R. L. Becerra, D. A. H. Buckley, N. R. Butler, S. B. Cenko, A. Chasovnikov, J. Durbak, C. Francile, E. Hammerstein, A. J. van der Horst, M. M. Kasli- wal, C. Kouveliotou, A. S. Kutyrev, W. ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Gill and J

    R. Gill and J. Granot, GRB 221009A afterglow from a shallow angular structured jet, MNRAS524, L78 (2023), arXiv:2304.14331 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    O. S. Salafia and G. Ghirlanda, The Structure of Gamma Ray Burst Jets, Galaxies10, 93 (2022), arXiv:2206.11088 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    M´ esz´ aros, M

    P. M´ esz´ aros, M. J. Rees, and R. A. M. J. Wijers, Viewing Angle and Environment Effects in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Sources of Afterglow Diversity, ApJ499, 301 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709273 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  52. [52]

    Granot, A

    J. Granot, A. Panaitescu, P. Kumar, and S. E. Woosley, Off-Axis Afterglow Emission from Jetted Gamma-Ray Bursts, ApJ570, L61 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0201322 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  53. [53]

    Rossi, D

    E. Rossi, D. Lazzati, and M. J. Rees, Afterglow light curves, viewing angle and the jet structure of γ-ray bursts, MNRAS332, 945 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0112083 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2002

  54. [54]

    Panaitescu and P

    A. Panaitescu and P. Kumar, The Effect of Angular Structure of Gamma-Ray Burst Outflows on the Af- terglow Emission, ApJ592, 390 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0301032 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2003

  55. [55]

    Beniamini, J

    P. Beniamini, J. Granot, and R. Gill, Afterglow light curves from misaligned structured jets, MNRAS493, 3521 (2020), arXiv:2001.02239 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Beniamini, R

    P. Beniamini, R. Duque, F. Daigne, and 27 R. Mochkovitch, X-ray plateaus in gamma-ray bursts’ light curves from jets viewed slightly off-axis, MNRAS 492, 2847 (2020), arXiv:1907.05899 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Birenbaum, R

    G. Birenbaum, R. Gill, O. Bromberg, P. Beniamini, and J. Granot, Afterglow Linear Polarization Signa- tures from Shallow GRB Jets: Implications for Ener- getic GRBs, ApJ974, 308 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Abdikamalov and P

    E. Abdikamalov and P. Beniamini, Reverse and for- ward shock afterglow emission from steep jets viewed off-axis, MNRAS539, 2707 (2025), arXiv:2502.12757 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    H. Wang, H. Zhou, Y.-Z. Fan, and D.-M. Wei, Forward and Reverse Shock Emission from Relativistic Jets with Arbitrary Angular and Stratified Radial Profiles, ApJ 990, 110 (2025), arXiv:2507.15311 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Ramirez-Ruiz and N

    E. Ramirez-Ruiz and N. M. Lloyd-Ronning, Beam mod- els for gamma-ray bursts sources: outflow structure, kinematics and emission mechanisms, New A7, 197 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0203447 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  61. [61]

    J. C. McKinney, General relativistic magnetohydrody- namic simulations of the jet formation and large-scale propagation from black hole accretion systems, MNRAS 368, 1561 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0603045 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  62. [62]

    S. S. Komissarov, N. Vlahakis, A. K¨ onigl, and M. V. Barkov, Magnetic acceleration of ultrarelativistic jets in gamma-ray burst sources, MNRAS394, 1182 (2009), arXiv:0811.1467 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    D. K. Desai, L. Combi, D. M. Siegel, and B. D. Metzger, Relativistic jets from millisecond proto- magnetars, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2601.07918 (2026), arXiv:2601.07918 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    B. J. Morsony, D. Lazzati, and M. C. Begelman, Tem- poral and Angular Properties of Gamma-Ray Burst Jets Emerging from Massive Stars, ApJ665, 569 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0609254 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  65. [65]

    Bromberg, E

    O. Bromberg, E. Nakar, T. Piran, and R. Sari, The Propagation of Relativistic Jets in External Media, ApJ 740, 100 (2011), arXiv:1107.1326 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  66. [66]

    O. Gottlieb, The Landscape of Collapsar Outflows: Structure, Signatures, and Origins of Einstein Probe Relativistic Supernova Transients, ApJ992, L3 (2025), arXiv:2509.04551 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    P. C. Duffell and A. I. MacFadyen, From Engine to Af- terglow: Collapsars Naturally Produce Top-heavy Jets and Early-time Plateaus in Gamma-Ray Burst After- glows, ApJ806, 205 (2015), arXiv:1407.8250 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Tchekhovskoy, J

    A. Tchekhovskoy, J. C. McKinney, and R. Narayan, Simulations of ultrarelativistic magnetodynamic jets from gamma-ray burst engines, MNRAS388, 551 (2008), arXiv:0803.3807 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    Zhang, X

    B. Zhang, X. Dai, N. M. Lloyd-Ronning, and P. M´ esz´ aros, Quasi-universal Gaussian Jets: A Unified Picture for Gamma-Ray Bursts and X-Ray Flashes, ApJ 601, L119 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0311190 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  70. [70]

    Xie, W.-H

    W. Xie, W.-H. Lei, Y.-C. Zou, D.-X. Wang, Q. Wu, and J.-Z. Wang, A two-component jet model based on the Blandford-Znajek and Blandford-Payne processes, Re- search in Astronomy and Astrophysics12, 817 (2012), arXiv:1202.5024 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  71. [71]

    Granot, Afterglow Light Curves from Impulsive Rel- ativistic Jets with an Unconventional Structure, ApJ 631, 1022 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504254 [astro-ph]

    J. Granot, Afterglow Light Curves from Impulsive Rel- ativistic Jets with an Unconventional Structure, ApJ 631, 1022 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504254 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  72. [72]

    F. Peng, A. K¨ onigl, and J. Granot, Two-Component Jet Models of Gamma-Ray Burst Sources, ApJ626, 966 (2005)

    2005

  73. [73]

    Pedersen, A

    H. Pedersen, A. O. Jaunsen, T. Grav, R. Østensen, M. I. Andersen, M. Wold, H. Kristen, A. Broeils, M. N¨ aslund, C. Fransson, M. Lacy, A. J. Castro-Tirado, J. Goros- abel, J. M. Rodr´ ıguez Espinosa, A. M. P´ erez, C. Wolf, R. Fockenbrock, J. Hjorth, P. Muhli, P. Hakala, L. Piro, M. Feroci, E. Costa, L. Nicastro, E. Palazzi, F. Frontera, L. Monaldi, and J...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  74. [74]

    D. A. Frail, E. Berger, T. Galama, S. R. Kulkarni, G. H. Moriarty-Schieven, G. G. Pooley, R. Sari, D. S. Shep- herd, G. B. Taylor, and F. Walter, The Enigmatic Ra- dio Afterglow of GRB 991216, ApJ538, L129 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0003138 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  75. [75]

    Berger, S

    E. Berger, S. R. Kulkarni, G. Pooley, D. A. Frail, V. McIntyre, R. M. Wark, R. Sari, A. M. Soderberg, D. W. Fox, S. Yost, and P. A. Price, A common ori- gin for cosmic explosions inferred from calorimetry of grb030329, Nature426, 154 (2003)

    2003

  76. [76]

    Sheth, D

    K. Sheth, D. A. Frail, S. White, M. Das, F. Bertoldi, F. Walter, S. R. Kulkarni, and E. Berger, Millimeter Observations of GRB 030329: Continued Evidence for a Two-Component Jet, ApJ595, L33 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0308188 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2003

  77. [77]

    Chen, X.-G

    L.-J. Chen, X.-G. Wang, Q. Wang, Z.-M. Zhou, W. Zheng, Y.-Z. Chen, and E.-W. Liang, GRB 191221B: The Two-component Jet with Forward and Reverse Shock, ApJ972, 158 (2024)

    2024

  78. [78]

    J. K. Leung, G. E. Anderson, A. J. van der Horst, C. Morley, B. Schneider, F. D. Colle, O. S. Salafia, G. Ghirlanda, S. L. Chastain, A. J. Goodwin, A. Gu- lati, L. Rhodes, S. D. Ryder, A. A. Chrimes, V. D’Elia, M. de Bony de Lavergne, M. D. Pasquale, A. de Ugarte Postigo, D. H. Hartmann, B. P. Gom- pertz, A. J. Levan, T. Murphy, G. P. Rowell, T. D. Russel...

    arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Y. Sato, K. Murase, Y. Ohira, S. Inoue, and R. Ya- mazaki, Two-component jet model for the afterglow emission of GRB 201216C and GRB 221009A and impli- cations for jet structure of very-high-energy gamma-ray bursts, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics48, 100415 (2025), arXiv:2502.19051 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Y. Sato, K. Obayashi, B. Theodre Zhang, S. J. Tanaka, K. Murase, Y. Ohira, and R. Yamazaki, Synchrotron self-compton emission in the two-component jet model for gamma-ray bursts, Journal of High Energy Astro- physics37, 51 (2023)

    2023

Showing first 80 references.