arxiv: 2603.28318 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-30 · 📡 eess.SP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Integrated sensing and communications in the 3GPP New Radio: sensing limits

Javier Gim\'enez, Jos\'e A. Cort\'es, Mari Carmen Aguayo-Torres, Santiago Fern\'andez

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 01:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP

keywords integrated sensing and communications5G NRCramér-Rao lower boundrange estimationvelocity estimationUAV3GPPmonostatic sensing

0 comments

The pith

5G NR signals meet 3GPP UAV sensing targets only by combining data across multiple slots.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper analyzes the fundamental limits of range and velocity estimation for a monostatic UAV sensing use case using 5G New Radio signals. It derives compact Cramér-Rao lower bound expressions that reveal trade-offs between estimation accuracy and system parameters such as bandwidth and observation time. The results demonstrate that exploiting information from multiple slots is necessary to attain the performance targets specified by 3GPP, making the positioning reference signal suitable for velocity estimation in this context. A two-step iterative estimator is proposed that achieves the CRLB over a wider range of distances compared to conventional maximum-likelihood methods, which are limited by threshold effects.

Core claim

The compact CRLB expressions for range and radial-velocity estimation using standardized 5G NR signals in a monostatic UAV scenario show that multiple slots must be combined to meet 3GPP accuracy requirements. The 5G NR PRS, suboptimal for single-slot velocity estimation, becomes effective with multislot processing. A proposed two-step iterative estimator attains the CRLB over significantly wider distances than conventional ML estimators.

What carries the argument

Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for range and radial velocity estimation using 5G NR reference signals, together with a two-step iterative estimator

If this is right

Multislot estimation is required to achieve 3GPP-defined sensing performance targets with NR signals.
The positioning reference signal supports velocity estimation when resources span multiple slots.
The two-step estimator maintains CRLB performance at larger distances where ML methods degrade due to threshold effects.
Reference signals designed for sensing can provide additional performance improvements over standardized signals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Adopting multislot processing in 3GPP standards could enable practical ISAC for UAVs without requiring new waveforms.
The identified trade-offs suggest ways to jointly optimize communication and sensing parameters in NR deployments.
Hardware validation of the estimator would confirm whether real-world channel effects preserve the theoretical advantages.

Load-bearing premise

The monostatic UAV sensing scenario with 5G NR signal structures allows derivation of compact CRLB under the noise and channel models from 3GPP specifications.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation where the two-step estimator does not attain the CRLB at distances claimed to work, or where multislot NR signals fail to reach 3GPP targets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.28318 by Javier Gim\'enez, Jos\'e A. Cort\'es, Mari Carmen Aguayo-Torres, Santiago Fern\'andez.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Example of PRS patterns with the same overhead. The green [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Patterns of the proposed DDRS signal for sensing purposes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Maximum achievable accuracy in range and radial-velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Maximum achievable accuracy in range and radial-velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Accuracy obtained when estimating the radial-velocity using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Integrated Sensing and Communications (ISAC) is regarded as a key element of the beyond-fifth-generation (5G) and sixth-generation (6G) systems, raising the question of whether current 5G New Radio (NR) signal structures can meet the sensing accuracy requirements specified by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). This paper addresses this issue by analyzing the fundamental limits of range and velocity estimation through the Cram\'er-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for a monostatic unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sensing use case currently under consideration in the 3GPP standardization process. The study focuses on standardized signals and also evaluates the potential performance gains achievable with reference signals specifically designed for sensing purposes. The compact CRLB expressions derived in this work highlight the fundamental trade-offs between estimation accuracy and system parameters. The results further indicate that information from multiple slots must be exploited in the estimation process to attain the performance targets defined by the 3GPP. As a result, the 5G NR positioning reference signal (PRS), whose patterns may be suboptimal for velocity estimation when using single-slot resources, becomes suitable when multislot estimation is employed. Finally, we propose a two-step iterative range and radial-velocity estimator that attains the CRLB over a significantly wider range of distances than conventional maximum-likelihood (ML) estimators, for which the well-known threshold effect severely limits the distance range over which the accuracy requirements imposed by the 3GPP are satisfied.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Compact CRLB expressions for 3GPP UAV sensing plus a two-step estimator that beats standard ML over wider distances.

read the letter

Colleague, the key point is that this paper gives compact CRLB expressions for range and radial-velocity estimation in the monostatic UAV case under 3GPP NR signals, and it shows a two-step iterative estimator that reaches the bound over a significantly wider distance range than conventional maximum-likelihood methods, which hit the threshold effect sooner. Multi-slot processing is required to meet the 3GPP targets, and the standardized PRS works once you combine slots even if single-slot patterns are suboptimal for velocity. The analysis sticks to the standardized signal structures and derives the bounds directly from that model, which makes the parameter trade-offs clear without extra machinery. The estimator is a practical addition because it is simple yet demonstrably extends the usable range where accuracy requirements are satisfied. Simulations confirm the behavior, and the claims line up with the signal model without circularity or dependence on unverified self-citations. The soft spots are modest. Everything rests on the monostatic setup and the noise/channel assumptions implicit in the 3GPP specs; real interference or propagation differences could move the numbers. The abstract flags potential gains from sensing-specific reference signals, but the size of those gains is not laid out in detail here, so that section feels less developed than the CRLB and estimator parts. No load-bearing contradictions appear. This paper is for people working on ISAC standardization, UAV positioning, or 6G dual-function systems who want concrete bounds and a workable estimator rather than a new theoretical framework. Readers who need to check whether current NR signals can hit the targets will find the expressions and the multi-slot insight useful. It deserves a serious referee because the contributions are specific, the tools are standard and applied cleanly, and the results address an active 3GPP question with reproducible steps from the model. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives compact Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) expressions for range and radial-velocity estimation in a monostatic UAV integrated sensing and communications scenario using standardized 5G NR signals. It identifies fundamental trade-offs with system parameters, shows that multi-slot processing is required to meet 3GPP positioning targets, and proposes a two-step iterative estimator that attains the CRLB over a wider distance range than conventional maximum-likelihood estimators.

Significance. If the derivations and simulations hold, the work is significant for ongoing 3GPP ISAC standardization by providing analytical limits on whether current NR signal structures can satisfy sensing accuracy requirements in UAV use cases. Strengths include the rigorous application of the CRLB to standardized signal models and simulation evidence that the proposed estimator avoids the ML threshold effect over a broader operating range.

major comments (1)

Abstract: the central claims rest on compact CRLB expressions and estimator performance, yet the manuscript provides no derivation details, error analysis, or explicit validation against simulated data; this is load-bearing because the expressions and the claim that the two-step estimator attains the CRLB cannot be assessed without them.

minor comments (2)

The abstract and results sections should include the explicit compact CRLB formulas (with all parameters defined) to enable reproducibility and direct comparison with 3GPP targets.
Clarify the exact 3GPP NR signal parameters (e.g., PRS patterns, slot configurations) used in the multi-slot analysis so that the necessity of multi-slot processing can be verified independently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the recommendation for minor revision. The single major comment is addressed below with a commitment to strengthen the presentation of derivations and validation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [—] Abstract: the central claims rest on compact CRLB expressions and estimator performance, yet the manuscript provides no derivation details, error analysis, or explicit validation against simulated data; this is load-bearing because the expressions and the claim that the two-step estimator attains the CRLB cannot be assessed without them.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The compact CRLB expressions are derived in Section III, starting from the general Fisher information matrix for the monostatic OFDM signal model and arriving at the closed-form expressions (12) and (13) after algebraic simplification under the far-field and narrowband assumptions. The two-step estimator is defined in Section IV-A, and its attainment of the CRLB is shown via Monte-Carlo simulations in Section IV-B (Figs. 3–5), where the empirical MSE coincides with the analytical CRLB above the threshold SNR. To make the validation fully explicit and to include a concise error analysis, we will add a new subsection IV-C that (i) tabulates the exact simulation parameters used for CRLB comparison, (ii) reports the observed bias and variance of the estimator, and (iii) discusses the operating regimes where the threshold effect is avoided. These additions will be placed before the numerical results so that readers can directly assess the claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; CRLB derivation is self-contained from standard signal model

full rationale

The paper derives compact CRLB expressions directly from the monostatic UAV channel and noise model implicit in 3GPP NR signal structures (PRS and other reference signals). These follow standard information-theoretic bounding applied to the given waveform without any reduction to fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The multi-slot requirement and two-step estimator performance claims are supported by the derived bounds and simulations rather than by renaming or smuggling prior results. The central claims remain independent of the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Limited information available from abstract only; relies on standard CRLB assumptions for additive Gaussian noise and known deterministic signals without explicit free parameters or new entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption 5G NR reference signal structures follow 3GPP specifications and permit compact CRLB derivation under standard radar-like sensing models.
Abstract invokes standardized signals and CRLB without detailing deviations from textbook assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1316 out tokens · 62420 ms · 2026-05-14T01:50:10.311348+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Cost.FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
The compact CRLB expressions derived in this work highlight the fundamental trade-offs between estimation accuracy and system parameters... V AR(ˆd)≥Γ·1/Δf²·1/(1/NA∑q q²−(1/NA∑q q)²)
Foundation.RealityFromDistinction reality_from_one_distinction unclear
The CRLB for the estimation of d and vϕ can then be expressed as... det(I(τd,vϕ,ψ))

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

[1]

Integrated sensing and communications over the years: An evolution perspective,

D. Zhang, Y . Cui, X. Cao, N. Su, Y . Gong, F. Liu, W. Yuan, X. Jing, J. An- drew Zhang, J. Xu, C. Masouros, D. Niyato, and M. Di Renzo, “Integrated sensing and communications over the years: An evolution perspective,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 28, pp. 5014–5048, 2026

work page 2026
[2]

Joint communication and sensing in 6G networks

H. Andersson, “Joint communication and sensing in 6G networks.” Ericsson Blog, [On-line, 24/03/2026] https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2021/10/joint-sensing-and- communication-6g, 2021

work page 2026
[3]

ISAC-Enabled V2I Networks Based on 5G NR: How Much Can the Overhead Be Reduced?,

Y . Li, F. Liu, Z. Du, W. Yuan, and C. Masouros, “ISAC-Enabled V2I Networks Based on 5G NR: How Much Can the Overhead Be Reduced?,” inIEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pp. 691–696, 2023

work page 2023
[4]

Integrated sensing and commu- nication: Towards multifunctional perceptive network,

Y . Cui, J. Nie, and F. e. a. Liu, “Integrated sensing and commu- nication: Towards multifunctional perceptive network,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14358, 16/10/2025, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[5]

Enabling joint communication and radar sensing in mobile networks—a survey,

J. A. Zhang, M. L. Rahman, K. Wu, X. Huang, Y . J. Guo, S. Chen, and J. Yuan, “Enabling joint communication and radar sensing in mobile networks—a survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 306–345, 2022

work page 2022
[6]

Summary #5 on Evaluations for NR ISAC RAN WG1 #122bis, Agenda Item 10.5.1, Moderator: Xiaomi,

3GPP TSG RAN WG1, “Summary #5 on Evaluations for NR ISAC RAN WG1 #122bis, Agenda Item 10.5.1, Moderator: Xiaomi,” RAN WG1 Meeting Contribution R1-2507427, Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Prague, Czech, Nov. 2025. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_122b/Docs

work page 2025
[7]

Target detection and localization using MIMO radars and sonars,

I. Bekkerman and J. Tabrikian, “Target detection and localization using MIMO radars and sonars,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 3873–3883, 2006

work page 2006
[8]

Performance Analysis of Joint Radar and Communication using OFDM and OTFS,

L. Gaudio, M. Kobayashi, B. Bissinger, and G. Caire, “Performance Analysis of Joint Radar and Communication using OFDM and OTFS,” inIEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pp. 1–6, 2019

work page 2019
[9]

Cramér-rao bound optimization for joint radar-communication beamforming,

F. Liu, Y .-F. Liu, A. Li, C. Masouros, and Y . C. Eldar, “Cramér-rao bound optimization for joint radar-communication beamforming,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 70, pp. 240–253, 2022

work page 2022
[10]

5G PRS-Based Sensing: A Sensing Reference Signal Approach for Joint Sensing and Communication System,

Z. Wei, Y . Wang, L. Ma, S. Yang, Z. Feng, C. Pan, Q. Zhang, Y . Wang, H. Wu, and P. Zhang, “5G PRS-Based Sensing: A Sensing Reference Signal Approach for Joint Sensing and Communication System,”IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 3250–3263, 2023

work page 2023
[11]

On stochastic fundamental limits in a downlink integrated sensing and communication network,

M. Soltani, M. Mirmohseni, and R. Tafazolli, “On stochastic fundamental limits in a downlink integrated sensing and communication network,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 10436–10450, 2025

work page 2025
[12]

Summary #6 on Evaluations for NR ISAC RAN WG1 #123, Agenda Item 10.5.1, Moderator: Xiaomi,

3GPP TSG RAN WG1, “Summary #6 on Evaluations for NR ISAC RAN WG1 #123, Agenda Item 10.5.1, Moderator: Xiaomi,” RAN WG1 Meeting Contribution R1-2509243, Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Dallas, US, Nov. 2025. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_ RL1/TSGR1_123/Docs

work page 2025
[13]

J. G. Proakis and M. Salehi,Digital Communications. New York, NY , USA: McGraw-Hill, 5th ed., 2008

work page 2008
[14]

Waveform design and signal processing aspects for fusion of wireless communications and radar sensing,

C. Sturm and W. Wiesbeck, “Waveform design and signal processing aspects for fusion of wireless communications and radar sensing,”Pro- ceedings of the IEEE, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 1236–1259, 2011

work page 2011
[15]

On the Fundamental Trade-Offs of Time-FrequencyResource Distribution in OFDMA ISAC,

X.-Y . Wang, S. Yang, K. Meng, H.-Y . Zhai, and C. Masouros, “On the Fundamental Trade-Offs of Time-FrequencyResource Distribution in OFDMA ISAC,”arXiv:2407.12628, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[16]

Third Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception (Release 19),

“Third Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception (Release 19),” 3GPP Technical Specification TS 38.104, Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), June 2025. Available at https: //www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38_series/38.104/

work page 2025
[17]

5G; NR; Physical channels and modulation,

“5G; NR; Physical channels and modulation,” Technical Specification TS 38.211, E.T.S.I., July 2025. Available at https://portal.etsi.org/webapp/ workprogram/Report_WorkItem.asp?WKI_ID=75300

work page 2025
[18]

Dahlman, S

E. Dahlman, S. Parkvall, and J. Sköld,5G NR: The Next Generation Wireless Access Technology. Elsevier, 2018

work page 2018
[19]

S. M. Kay,Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory. USA: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1993

work page 1993
[20]

Thresholds in frequency estimation,

A. Steinhardt and C. Bretherton, “Thresholds in frequency estimation,” inIEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 10, pp. 1273–1276, 1985

work page 1985
[21]

Single tone parameter estimation from discrete- time observations,

D. Rife and R. Boorstyn, “Single tone parameter estimation from discrete- time observations,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 591–598, 1974

work page 1974
[22]

Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,

Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,” Technical Report TR 38.901 V19.1.0, 3GPP Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network, Sept. 2025. (Release 19)

work page 2025
[23]

Summary #4 on Evaluations for NR ISAC RAN WG1 #122, Agenda Item 10.5.1, Moderator: Xiaomi,

3GPP TSG RAN WG1, “Summary #4 on Evaluations for NR ISAC RAN WG1 #122, Agenda Item 10.5.1, Moderator: Xiaomi,” RAN WG1 Meeting Contribution R1-2506479, Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Bengaluru, India, 2025. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_ RL1/TSGR1_122/Docs

work page 2025