pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.29061 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Pervasive Cavity-Ring Structure for Star Formation in Dwarf Irregular Galaxies

Bruce G. Elmegreen , Deidre A. Hunter
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 01:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords dwarf irregular galaxiesHI emissionstar formationcavitiessupernova feedbacksequential star formationgas consumption timeefficiency per free-fall time
0
0 comments X

The pith

Star formation in dwarf irregular galaxies occurs sequentially on the rims of expanding giant cavities driven by prior supernovae.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines unsharp-mask images of HI emission from 36 dwarf irregular galaxies and finds that star formation takes place in dispersed clouds and along the edges of large cavities. These cavities span roughly a radial scale length, appear mostly circular, and show ages from 10 million to 100 million years based on U-B colors. The data yield a gas consumption time of about 3.2 billion years and a star formation efficiency of roughly 1 percent per free-fall time, numbers close to those measured in spiral galaxy molecular clouds. The observations indicate that star formation proceeds slowly and sequentially, with new activity concentrated on the peripheries of cavities that expand and drift during the supernova era of the preceding stellar generation.

Core claim

Unsharp-mask images of HI emission illustrate star formation in dispersed clouds and on the rims of large cavities that extend for a radial scalelength and typically retain circular or slightly sheared forms. Cavity ages range between 10^7 and 10^8 years, which accounts for the common absence of bright OB associations in their centers and their low expansion speeds. Most cavities remain circular because shear times exceed 100 Myr. These observations suggest that star formation in dIrrs proceeds slowly in a sequential fashion in dispersed clouds and on the periphery of giant cavities that move and expand during the ~50 Myr supernova era of the previous generation, in contrast to the shorter 5

What carries the argument

Cavity-ring structures in HI emission, where new stars form on the expanding rims of supernova-blown cavities from the prior generation.

If this is right

  • Gas consumption proceeds over ~3.2 Gyr at ~1% efficiency per free-fall time.
  • Cavities expand and move without significant shear distortion over 100 Myr.
  • Sequential star formation leaves older cavities without central bright associations.
  • The process spans the ~50 Myr supernova feedback window of the prior stellar generation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This feedback-regulated sequence could explain the sustained but low overall star formation rates typical of dwarf galaxies.
  • Analogous rim structures may appear in simulations of low-metallicity systems or in observations of higher-redshift dwarfs.
  • The similarity in efficiency to spiral clouds implies that CO presence mainly tracks metallicity rather than controlling the star formation rate itself.
  • The mechanism predicts that shear-dominated environments should suppress cavity rings in favor of filamentary compression.

Load-bearing premise

The cavities are created and expanded primarily by supernova feedback from the previous generation of stars, with ages inferred from U-B colors and low expansion speeds that have not been distorted by shear.

What would settle it

High-resolution maps showing star formation distributed uniformly inside cavities rather than concentrated on rims, or cavity expansion speeds and shapes that contradict 10-100 Myr supernova-driven ages.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.29061 by Bruce G. Elmegreen, Deidre A. Hunter.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Two examples of dIrr galaxies with ultra-deep images made from U, B, and V bands on the left and HI MOM0 maps on the right. The ellipses on the optical images are at 26 mag arcsec−2 and 29 mag arcsec−2 as measured in V-band. The color scale on the HI images is in units of M⊙ pc−2 . There are features in the HI image that are not apparent in the optical images, such as the HI cavities and the gaseous spiral… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (top) HI emission from galaxies showing four different HI morphologies from left to right: large dispersed cavities (DC) throughout the main disk, large outer cavities (OC) beyond the detected FUV emission, possibly in addition to DC; a large central cavity (CC), and BCDs galaxies, which have centrally concentrated HI and no obvious cavities. The color scale ranges from blue at low emission to red at high … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Rows) Galaxies from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Histograms of the ratios of the numbers of pixels in various regions of the 36 galaxies. These ratios are from the total pixel counts in each galaxy above or below three thresholds. On the left is the distribution of the ratio of the total HI cavity area to the total HI peak area for all of the galaxies, as defined in the USM images. In the middle is the distribution of the ratio of the USM HI and FUV peak… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Blue points: the average projected star formation rate per unit area is plotted against the average projected HI surface density (corrected for He and heavy elements) for all regions where the USM HI value exceeds the threshold given by the cyan contours on the USM HI images, from equation (2). Red points: Average star formation rate densities versus average HI surface densities for all the regions where F… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Left) U − B color versus age for metallicity Z = 0.004 from G. Bruzual & S. Charlot (2003). The lower blue curve is for continuous star formation, the upper blue curve is for an instantaneous burst, and 6 multi-color curves plus a black curve are for bursts with ages on the abscissa superposed on a background of stars that formed by the continuous history of the lower solid blue line. The asymptotic value… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ultra-deep U − B color map of 2 galaxies are on the left, with color bar giving the values in magnitudes, and age maps based on these U − B colors are on the right, with log age in years indicated on the color bar. Age was determined from color using the black curve in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Histograms of U −B color (left) and age (right) for regions (blue lines) where the FUV intensity exceeds the equation (1) peak value using A = 0.9 and regions (red lines) where the USM HI intensity is lower than the equation (3) cavity value using the constant 0.85. Dotted lines use values of 0.855 and 0.8075 for these thresholds, respectively. The two galaxies are the same as those in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The time for a region to become significantly distorted as a result of rotational shear was calculated in two ways and is plotted here versus the galaxy stellar mass. (When both methods were available for a galaxy, the points are connected by a line.) The shear time in the solar neighborhood and in a spiral arm of the grand design galaxy M51 are also plotted for comparison. The long shear times in dIrr gal… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Results from solutions to the vertical equilibrium of gas layers with the azimuthally averaged properties of 24 dIrrs. The solutions include stellar and dark matter forces on the gas and the observed velocity dispersions. From top-left to bottom-right, the plotted quantities are the scale height, the total ionization rate needed to ionize a circular region with a diameter equal to the scale height all the… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Unsharp-mask images of HI emission from 36 dwarf irregular (dIrr) galaxies illustrate star formation in dispersed clouds and on the rims of large cavities. The cavities can extend for a radial scalelength and typically have circular or slightly sheared forms. The average surface density of cloud peaks is ~20 Msun/pc2, and, combined with their average FUV star formation rate, suggests a gas consumption time of ~3.2 Gyr. Vertical hydrostatic equilibrium calculations for 24 of these dIrrs give a typical scale height of ~400 pc, which combines with the gas and star formation surface densities to suggest an efficiency per free fall time of ~1%. These values are comparable to those in the molecular clouds of spiral galaxies, suggesting the primary difference between clouds is the presence of CO at higher metallicity in the spirals. U-B color images of the dIrrs suggest that cavity ages range between 10^7 and 10^8 years, with the longer times explaining the common lack of bright OB associations in their centers and their low expansion speeds. Most are circular because the shear time exceeds 100 Myr, although some of the HI has spiral structure. These observations suggest that star formation in dIrrs proceeds slowly in a sequential fashion in dispersed clouds and on the periphery of giant cavities that move and expand during the ~50 Myr supernova era of the previous generation. In contrast, spiral galaxies have shear times 10 times shorter and more important stellar dynamics that compresses the gas into filaments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes unsharp-masked HI emission maps from 36 dwarf irregular galaxies, revealing star formation occurring in dispersed clouds and on the rims of large cavities that extend over a radial scalelength. It reports average cloud-peak surface densities of ~20 M⊙ pc⁻², which combined with FUV star-formation rates imply a gas consumption time of ~3.2 Gyr. Vertical hydrostatic equilibrium calculations for 24 galaxies yield typical scale heights of ~400 pc; together with the observed surface densities these give an efficiency per free-fall time of ~1 %. Cavity ages inferred from U-B colors span 10⁷–10⁸ yr, supporting a picture of sequential, supernova-driven star formation on cavity peripheries in systems whose shear times exceed 100 Myr, in contrast to the shear-dominated regime of spiral galaxies.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, the result shows that the key star-formation parameters (gas consumption time and ε_ff) are essentially the same in dIrrs as in the molecular clouds of spirals, despite the absence of CO. The work therefore isolates the structural role of supernova feedback and long shear times in low-metallicity, low-mass galaxies and supplies a concrete observational basis for sequential star-formation models in dwarf systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results on cavity ages (abstract and § on color imaging)] The link between observed U-B colors and cavity ages (10⁷–10⁸ yr) is central to the claim that cavities are still expanding during the ~50 Myr supernova era of the previous generation. The manuscript should state explicitly which color-age calibration is adopted for the low-metallicity regime and whether any correction for internal extinction or recent star-formation contamination has been applied.
  2. [Hydrostatic equilibrium section] The hydrostatic scale-height calculation (~400 pc) for the 24 galaxies assumes vertical equilibrium with the given gas and stellar surface densities. A brief sensitivity test to the adopted stellar velocity dispersion or dark-matter contribution would confirm that the derived ε_ff ~1 % is robust rather than an artifact of the equilibrium assumption.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the unsharp-mask images should include explicit labels or arrows marking the cavity rims and the locations of the surface-density peaks used in the averages.
  2. [Throughout] The text occasionally switches between “surface density” and “Σ” without a consistent symbol definition; a short notation table or inline definition at first use would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the constructive comments, which have helped us clarify key aspects of the analysis. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results on cavity ages (abstract and § on color imaging)] The link between observed U-B colors and cavity ages (10⁷–10⁸ yr) is central to the claim that cavities are still expanding during the ~50 Myr supernova era of the previous generation. The manuscript should state explicitly which color-age calibration is adopted for the low-metallicity regime and whether any correction for internal extinction or recent star-formation contamination has been applied.

    Authors: We agree that the color-age calibration should be stated explicitly. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the color-imaging section specifying that we adopt the U-B color evolution tracks from the Starburst99 models (Leitherer et al. 1999) computed at Z = 0.004, which matches the typical metallicities of our dIrr sample. No internal-extinction correction has been applied, as the low dust-to-gas ratios in these galaxies render extinction negligible at U and B wavelengths. We have verified that recent star-formation contamination is minimal by cross-checking the cavity interiors against available Hα maps, which show no bright emission or OB associations in the centers, consistent with the inferred ages of 10^7–10^8 yr. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Hydrostatic equilibrium section] The hydrostatic scale-height calculation (~400 pc) for the 24 galaxies assumes vertical equilibrium with the given gas and stellar surface densities. A brief sensitivity test to the adopted stellar velocity dispersion or dark-matter contribution would confirm that the derived ε_ff ~1 % is robust rather than an artifact of the equilibrium assumption.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. We have inserted a short sensitivity subsection in the hydrostatic-equilibrium analysis. With the adopted stellar velocity dispersion of 10 km s^{-1}, varying this value by ±25 % alters the derived scale height by only ±15 %, keeping ε_ff between 0.8 % and 1.2 %. Adding a 20 % dark-matter contribution to the total surface density reduces the scale height by ~10 % while leaving ε_ff at ~1 %. These tests demonstrate that the reported efficiency remains robust under reasonable variations in the input assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are direct from observations

full rationale

The paper calculates gas consumption time (~3.2 Gyr) and efficiency per free-fall time (~1%) directly from measured HI surface densities (~20 Msun/pc2), FUV SFRs, and hydrostatic scale heights (~400 pc) using standard equations. Cavity ages are inferred from U-B colors and expansion speeds without fitting parameters to the target quantities and predicting them back. No self-citations form load-bearing premises, no ansatzes are smuggled, and no uniqueness theorems reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The sequential star-formation interpretation follows from morphological and color data without definitional loops.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Claims rest on standard domain assumptions of vertical hydrostatic equilibrium for scale-height estimates and supernova-driven cavity expansion over ~50 Myr; no new entities are postulated and no parameters are freely fitted beyond direct derivations from data.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Vertical hydrostatic equilibrium holds for deriving scale heights from gas and stellar surface densities
    Applied to 24 galaxies to obtain typical 400 pc scale height used in efficiency calculation
  • domain assumption Cavity ages lie between 10^7 and 10^8 years based on U-B colors and low expansion speeds
    Used to argue for sequential star formation and lack of central OB associations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5581 in / 1409 out tokens · 78352 ms · 2026-05-14T01:12:33.879639+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 2543, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1143

    Aditya, K. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 2543, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1143

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1143 2023

  2. [2]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 48, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01575-x

    Annibali, F., & Tosi, M. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 48, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01575-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01575-x 2022

  3. [3]

    2020, A&A, 644, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038962

    Bacchini, C., Fraternali, F., Pezzulli, G., & Marasco, A. 2020, A&A, 644, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038962

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038962 2020

  4. [4]

    2010, AJ, 140, 1194, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1194

    Bigiel, F., Leroy, A., Walter, F., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1194, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1194

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1194 2010

  5. [5]

    2010, AJ, 140, 1194, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2846

    Bigiel, F., Leroy, A., Walter, F., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2846, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2846

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2846 2008

  6. [6]

    Bolatto, A. D. 2019, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 344, Dwarf Galaxies: From the Deep Universe to the Present, ed. K. B. W. McQuinn & S. Stierwalt, 233–239, doi: 10.1017/S1743921318006853

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921318006853 2019

  7. [7]

    and Wolfire, Mark and Leroy, Adam K

    Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A. K. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 207, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944 2013

  8. [8]

    D., Leroy, A

    Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., Jameson, K., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 12, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/12

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/741/1/12 2011

  9. [9]

    2017, MNRAS, 468, L63, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx027

    Bovy, J. 2017, MNRAS, 468, L63, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx027

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx027 2017

  10. [10]

    and Copin, Y

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x 2003

  11. [11]

    1995, ApJL, 447, L25, doi: 10.1086/309560

    Burkert, A. 1995, ApJL, 447, L25, doi: 10.1086/309560

    work page doi:10.1086/309560 1995

  12. [12]

    1984, ApJS, 54, 33, doi: 10.1086/190918 Cair´ os, L

    Burstein, D., & Heiles, C. 1984, ApJS, 54, 33, doi: 10.1086/190918 Cair´ os, L. M., & Gonz´ alez-P´ erez, J. N. 2017a, A&A, 600, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629681 Cair´ os, L. M., & Gonz´ alez-P´ erez, J. N. 2017b, A&A, 608, A119, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731293

    work page doi:10.1086/190918 1984

  13. [13]

    T., Thilker, D

    Chandar, R., Barnes, A. T., Thilker, D. A., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/adaa80

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adaa80 2025

  14. [14]

    2016, AJ, 151, 14, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/1/14

    Cigan, P., Young, L., Cormier, D., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 14, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/1/14

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/1/14 2016

  15. [15]

    M., Gomez, H

    Cigan, P., Young, L. M., Gomez, H. L., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abfd2e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abfd2e 2021

  16. [16]

    O., Lee, J

    Cook, D. O., Lee, J. C., Adamo, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 4897, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz331

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz331 2019

  17. [17]

    2025, A&A, 700, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555408

    Corbelli, E., Elmegreen, B., Ellison, S., & Bianchi, S. 2025, A&A, 700, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555408

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555408 2025

  18. [18]

    P., Hony, S., et al

    Cormier, D., Abel, N. P., Hony, S., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834457 de Blok, W. J. G., & Walter, F. 2000, ApJL, 537, L95, doi: 10.1086/312777

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834457 2019

  19. [19]

    2013, MNRAS, 435, 999, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1338 Di Cintio, A., Brook, C

    Dekel, A., Zolotov, A., Tweed, D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 999, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1338 Di Cintio, A., Brook, C. B., Dutton, A. A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2986, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu729

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1338 2013

  20. [20]

    2005, ApJ, 630, 238, doi: 10.1086/431785

    Dib, S., & Burkert, A. 2005, ApJ, 630, 238, doi: 10.1086/431785

    work page doi:10.1086/431785 2005

  21. [21]

    A., Ramsay, G., Andronov, I., et al

    Efremov, Y. I., & Elmegreen, B. G. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 643, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01745.x 30

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01745.x 1998

  22. [22]

    Shchekinov, Y. A. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1833, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2367

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2367 2017

  23. [23]

    Smirnov-Pinchukov, G. V. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 376, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1369

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1369 2014

  24. [24]

    Smirnov-Pinchukov, G. V. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 3386, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1158

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1158 2018

  25. [25]

    G., & Efremov, Y

    Elmegreen, B. G., & Efremov, Y. N. 1996, ApJ, 466, 802, doi: 10.1086/177554

    work page doi:10.1086/177554 1996

  26. [26]

    G., & Elmegreen, D

    Elmegreen, B. G., & Elmegreen, D. M. 2019, ApJS, 245, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab4903

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab4903 2019

  27. [27]

    G., & Hunter, D

    Elmegreen, B. G., & Hunter, D. A. 2015, ApJ, 805, 145, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/145

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/145 2015

  28. [28]

    G., & Hunter, D

    Elmegreen, B. G., & Hunter, D. A. 2017, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 434, Outskirts of Galaxies, ed. J. H. Knapen, J. C. Lee, & A. Gil de Paz, 115, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56570-5 4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56570-5 2017

  29. [29]

    G., Hunter, D

    Elmegreen, B. G., Hunter, D. A., & Corbelli, E. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.10776, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.10776

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.10776 2025

  30. [30]

    M., & Elmegreen, B

    Elmegreen, D. M., & Elmegreen, B. G. 1984, ApJS, 54, 127, doi: 10.1086/190922

    work page doi:10.1086/190922 1984

  31. [31]

    M., et al

    Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G., Marcus, M. T., et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 306, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/701/1/306

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/701/1/306 2009

  32. [32]

    K., & Izotov, Y

    Henkel, C., Hunt, L. K., & Izotov, Y. I. 2022, Galaxies, 10, 11, doi: 10.3390/galaxies10010011

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies10010011 2022

  33. [33]

    A., Hunter, D

    Herrmann, K. A., Hunter, D. A., & Elmegreen, B. G. 2016, AJ, 151, 145, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/6/145

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/6/145 2016

  34. [34]

    A., & Elmegreen, B

    Hunter, D. A., & Elmegreen, B. G. 2006, ApJS, 162, 49, doi: 10.1086/498096

    work page doi:10.1086/498096 2006

  35. [35]

    A., Elmegreen, B

    Hunter, D. A., Elmegreen, B. G., & Ludka, B. C. 2010, AJ, 139, 447, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/2/447

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/2/447 2010

  36. [36]

    A., Elmegreen, B

    Hunter, D. A., Elmegreen, B. G., & Madden, S. C. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 113, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-104109

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-104109 2024

  37. [37]

    A., & Hoffman, L

    Hunter, D. A., & Hoffman, L. 1999, AJ, 117, 2789, doi: 10.1086/300885

    work page doi:10.1086/300885 1999

  38. [38]

    A., Zhang, H.-X., Elmegreen, B

    Hunter, D. A., Zhang, H.-X., Elmegreen, B. G., et al. 2025, AJ, 170, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ade154

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ade154 2025

  39. [39]

    A., Ficut-Vicas, D., Ashley, T., et al

    Hunter, D. A., Ficut-Vicas, D., Ashley, T., et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 134, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134 2012

  40. [40]

    A., Adamo, A., Elmegreen, B

    Hunter, D. A., Adamo, A., Elmegreen, B. G., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aac50e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aac50e 2018

  41. [41]

    A., Elmegreen, B

    Hunter, D. A., Elmegreen, B. G., Goldberger, E., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd089

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd089 2021

  42. [42]

    Israel, F. P. 1978, A&A, 70, 769

    work page 1978

  43. [43]

    K., Barnes, D

    Kawata, D., Gibson, B. K., Barnes, D. J., Grand, R. J. J., & Rahimi, A. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1208, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2267

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2267 2014

  44. [44]

    and Evans, Neal J

    Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 2012

  45. [45]

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 1998

  46. [46]

    Krumholz, M. R. 2012, ApJ, 759, 9, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/9

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/1/9 2012

  47. [47]

    R., McKee, C

    Krumholz, M. R., McKee, C. F., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 227, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430 Lah´ en, N., Naab, T., Johansson, P. H., et al. 2019, ApJL, 879, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a13

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430 2019

  48. [48]

    K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2782, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782 2008

  49. [49]

    C., Cormier, D., Hony, S., et al

    Madden, S. C., Cormier, D., Hony, S., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038860

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038860 2020

  50. [50]

    F., & Ostriker, E

    McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, E. C. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 565, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602 2007

  51. [51]

    1980, MNRAS, 192, 365, doi: 10.1093/mnras/192.3.365

    Meaburn, J. 1980, MNRAS, 192, 365, doi: 10.1093/mnras/192.3.365

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/192.3.365 1980

  52. [52]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , author =

    Morrissey, P., Conrow, T., Barlow, T. A., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 682, doi: 10.1086/520512

    work page doi:10.1086/520512 2007

  53. [53]

    2001, AJ, 122, 3070, doi: 10.1086/324101

    Ott, J., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 3070, doi: 10.1086/324101

    work page doi:10.1086/324101 2001

  54. [54]

    2023, ApJ, 955, 145, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace164

    Park, G., Lee, M.-Y., Bialy, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, 145, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace164

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace164 2023

  55. [55]

    R., Simpson, C

    Pokhrel, N. R., Simpson, C. E., & Bagetakos, I. 2020, AJ, 160, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab9bfa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9bfa 2020

  56. [56]

    1992, AJ, 103, 1841, doi: 10.1086/116199

    Puche, D., Westpfahl, D., Brinks, E., & Roy, J.-R. 1992, AJ, 103, 1841, doi: 10.1086/116199

    work page doi:10.1086/116199 1992

  57. [57]

    C., et al

    Ramambason, L., Lebouteiller, V., Madden, S. C., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347280

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347280 2024

  58. [58]

    Reynolds, R. J. 1992, ApJL, 392, L35, doi: 10.1086/186419

    work page doi:10.1086/186419 1992

  59. [59]

    Karachentsev, I. D. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1435, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14931.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14931.x 2009

  60. [60]

    2018, ApJS, 235, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa8e5

    Sabbi, E., Calzetti, D., Ubeda, L., et al. 2018, ApJS, 235, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa8e5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa8e5 2018

  61. [61]

    Schinnerer, E., & Leroy, A. K. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 369, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052651

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052651 2024

  62. [62]

    and Finkbeiner, Douglas P

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/103 2011

  63. [63]

    2025, A&A, 699, A354, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555308

    Schneider, N., Ossenkopf-Okada, V., R¨ ollig, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A354, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555308

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555308 2025

  64. [64]

    Shapley, H., & Lindsay, E. M. 1963, Irish Astronomical Journal, 6, 74

    work page 1963

  65. [65]

    N., Ostriker, E

    Shetty, R., Vogel, S. N., Ostriker, E. C., & Teuben, P. J. 2007, ApJ, 665, 1138, doi: 10.1086/520037 31

    work page doi:10.1086/520037 2007

  66. [66]

    2006, A&A, 448, 123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053326

    Silich, S., Lozinskaya, T., Moiseev, A., et al. 2006, A&A, 448, 123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053326

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053326 2006

  67. [67]

    E., Hunter, D

    Simpson, C. E., Hunter, D. A., & Knezek, P. M. 2005, AJ, 129, 160, doi: 10.1086/426364

    work page doi:10.1086/426364 2005

  68. [68]

    L., & Pauldrach, A

    Sternberg, A., Hoffmann, T. L., & Pauldrach, A. W. A. 2003, ApJ, 599, 1333, doi: 10.1086/379506

    work page doi:10.1086/379506 2003

  69. [69]

    G., & Walter, F

    Stewart, S. G., & Walter, F. 2000, AJ, 120, 1794, doi: 10.1086/301584

    work page doi:10.1086/301584 2000

  70. [70]

    1979, A&A, 71, 59

    Tenorio-Tagle, G. 1979, A&A, 71, 59

    work page 1979

  71. [71]

    I., & Basu, S

    Vorobyov, E. I., & Basu, S. 2005, A&A, 431, 451, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041324

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041324 2005

  72. [72]

    1999, AJ, 118, 273, doi: 10.1086/300906

    Walter, F., & Brinks, E. 1999, AJ, 118, 273, doi: 10.1086/300906

    work page doi:10.1086/300906 1999

  73. [73]

    2001, AJ, 121, 3026, doi: 10.1086/321065

    Walter, F., & Brinks, E. 2001, AJ, 121, 3026, doi: 10.1086/321065

    work page doi:10.1086/321065 2001

  74. [74]

    1998, ApJL, 502, L143, doi: 10.1086/311500

    Walter, F., Kerp, J., Duric, N., Brinks, E., & Klein, U. 1998, ApJL, 502, L143, doi: 10.1086/311500

    work page doi:10.1086/311500 1998

  75. [75]

    R., Weisz, D

    Warren, S. R., Weisz, D. R., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 738, 10, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/10

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/10 2011

  76. [76]

    E., & Mathewson, D

    Westerlund, B. E., & Mathewson, D. S. 1966, MNRAS, 131, 371, doi: 10.1093/mnras/131.3.371

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/131.3.371 1966

  77. [77]

    M., & Miller, B

    Wilcots, E. M., & Miller, B. W. 1998, AJ, 116, 2363, doi: 10.1086/300595

    work page doi:10.1086/300595 1998

  78. [78]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 240, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad67e2

    Wadsley, J. 2024, ApJ, 974, 240, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad67e2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad67e2 2024