pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.29443 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-31 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Cosmological brick walls & quantum chaotic dynamics of de Sitter horizons

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 23:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords brick wall modelde Sitter horizonsquantum chaosspectral form factorKrylov complexitySchwarzschild-de Sitternormal modeslevel statistics
0
0 comments X

The pith

The brick-wall model applied to de Sitter horizons shows that spectral form factor and Krylov complexity detect chaotic dynamics even when the level-spacing distribution lacks repulsion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the brick-wall cutoff to asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes to examine the quantum dynamics of horizons. It computes the normal modes of a massless scalar field in pure de Sitter space and in Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes, then examines the spectra with level-spacing statistics, the spectral form factor, and Krylov complexity. Pure de Sitter yields long-range chaotic signatures without obeying a conventional Wigner-Dyson distribution. In the Schwarzschild-de Sitter case the WKB regime produces two independent near-horizon sectors whose spectra superpose, so the combined level-spacing distribution shows a nonzero value at zero separation while spectral correlations persist. For small stretched-horizon fluctuations the superposed spectrum still produces an approximately linear ramp in the spectral form factor and a clear peak in Krylov complexity, indicating that these two quantities diagnose chaos more reliably than level repulsion alone.

Core claim

In asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes the brick-wall cutoff yields normal modes of a massless scalar whose spectrum, when analyzed in the WKB regime, displays an approximately linear ramp in the spectral form factor and a pronounced peak in Krylov complexity even though the superposition of two independent horizon sectors produces a level-spacing distribution with nonzero probability at zero separation.

What carries the argument

The brick-wall cutoff near each horizon in the WKB regime, which isolates two independent near-horizon sectors whose mode spectra superpose to give the full single-particle spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The brick-wall cutoff and WKB regime capture the relevant near-horizon quantum dynamics without back-reaction or higher-curvature corrections that would mix the two horizon sectors.

What would settle it

A calculation that includes back-reaction mixing the event-horizon and cosmological-horizon sectors and removes the linear ramp from the spectral form factor.

read the original abstract

Originally proposed by 't Hooft, the brick wall model has recently reemerged as a useful framework for probing quantum aspects of horizon physics, particularly in the context of holography. In this paper, we apply it to asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes. We compute the normal modes of a massless scalar field in pure de Sitter space and in the Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole, and analyze the resulting single-particle spectra using the level-spacing distribution, the spectral form factor, and Krylov complexity. In pure de Sitter, the spectrum exhibits clear long-range signatures of chaos despite not obeying a conventional Wigner-Dyson level-spacing distribution. The Schwarzschild-de Sitter case is qualitatively richer: in the WKB regime, where tunneling between the two classically allowed regions is exponentially suppressed, the presence of both an event horizon and a cosmological horizon gives rise to two independent near-horizon sectors, so that the full spectrum is the superposition of two subsequences. As a result, the combined level-spacing distribution develops a nonzero value at $s=0$ even when spectral correlations remain. Nevertheless, for sufficiently small stretched-horizon fluctuations, the superposed spectrum still exhibits an approximately linear ramp in the spectral form factor and a pronounced peak in Krylov complexity. Our results show that the absence of strict level repulsion should not, by itself, be taken as evidence against chaos, and that the spectral form factor and Krylov complexity provide sharper diagnostics of the underlying chaotic dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the brick-wall cutoff to asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes and computes the normal-mode spectrum of a massless scalar field in pure de Sitter and Schwarzschild-de Sitter geometries. The resulting single-particle spectra are diagnosed with level-spacing distributions, spectral form factor (SFF), and Krylov complexity. In pure de Sitter the spectrum shows long-range chaotic signatures without conventional Wigner-Dyson repulsion. In the Schwarzschild-de Sitter case the WKB regime produces two independent near-horizon sectors whose superposition yields a level-spacing distribution with nonzero value at s=0, yet the SFF still exhibits an approximately linear ramp and Krylov complexity a pronounced peak. The central conclusion is that absence of strict level repulsion is not by itself evidence against chaos and that SFF and Krylov complexity are sharper diagnostics.

Significance. If the numerical diagnostics are robust and the sector independence holds, the work would refine the set of observables used to detect quantum chaos near horizons. It supplies concrete evidence that standard nearest-neighbor statistics can be misleading in multi-sector systems while longer-range correlators remain reliable, with direct relevance to holographic models of de Sitter space and to the brick-wall approach for near-horizon physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [WKB regime and SdS spectrum] WKB regime, Schwarzschild-de Sitter analysis: the claim that the full spectrum is an incoherent superposition of two independent chaotic subsequences rests on exponentially suppressed tunneling between the event-horizon and cosmological-horizon wells. No explicit WKB tunneling integral, transmission coefficient, or comparison of the tunneling rate to the mean level spacing is provided. Without this quantification the independence assumption remains unverified and the survival of the SFF ramp under superposition cannot be taken as robust.
  2. [Numerical results and figures] Numerical extraction of spectra and diagnostics: the level-spacing histograms, SFF ramps, and Krylov peaks are central to the claim that SFF and Krylov complexity remain reliable while level spacing does not. The manuscript does not document error control on the mode counting, the precise energy windows employed, or checks against post-hoc adjustments. These details are load-bearing for the distinction drawn between the three diagnostics.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the range of brick-wall cutoff radii and stretched-horizon fluctuation amplitudes explored, together with the criterion used to identify the WKB regime.
  2. Figure captions for the SFF and Krylov plots should specify the time or complexity range shown, the number of realizations averaged, and any smoothing applied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and additions.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: WKB regime, Schwarzschild-de Sitter analysis: the claim that the full spectrum is an incoherent superposition of two independent chaotic subsequences rests on exponentially suppressed tunneling between the event-horizon and cosmological-horizon wells. No explicit WKB tunneling integral, transmission coefficient, or comparison of the tunneling rate to the mean level spacing is provided. Without this quantification the independence assumption remains unverified and the survival of the SFF ramp under superposition cannot be taken as robust.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantification of the tunneling suppression is necessary to rigorously justify the sector independence. In the revised manuscript we will add the WKB tunneling integral between the two classically allowed regions, evaluate the transmission coefficient for representative high-lying modes, and compare the tunneling rate directly to the mean level spacing in the energy window used for the diagnostics. This will confirm that tunneling remains exponentially small relative to the level spacing, supporting the incoherent superposition. While the exponential suppression follows from standard WKB barrier penetration, we will present the explicit calculation as requested. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Numerical extraction of spectra and diagnostics: the level-spacing histograms, SFF ramps, and Krylov peaks are central to the claim that SFF and Krylov complexity remain reliable while level spacing does not. The manuscript does not document error control on the mode counting, the precise energy windows employed, or checks against post-hoc adjustments. These details are load-bearing for the distinction drawn between the three diagnostics.

    Authors: We acknowledge that greater documentation of the numerical procedures is required. In the revision we will add a dedicated methods subsection (or appendix) that specifies the mode-counting algorithm, the precise energy windows chosen for each diagnostic together with the physical rationale, quantitative error estimates obtained by varying the brick-wall cutoff, discretization parameters, and fitting windows, and explicit checks demonstrating stability against small post-hoc adjustments in binning or window selection. These additions will substantiate the robustness of the reported level-spacing distributions, SFF ramps, and Krylov complexity peaks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct numerical spectra with standard diagnostics

full rationale

The paper extracts single-particle spectra numerically from the brick-wall cutoff in de Sitter and SdS geometries, then applies the standard level-spacing distribution, spectral form factor, and Krylov complexity. These diagnostics are computed directly from the eigenvalues without any fitted parameters that are later renamed as predictions. The WKB regime is invoked to justify treating the two horizon sectors as independent, but this is a standard semiclassical approximation whose validity is external to the paper's own results; no self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or self-definitional loop is present. The central claim follows from the explicit superposition of two subsequences and does not reduce to the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumptions of quantum field theory in curved spacetime plus the brick-wall regularization; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the usual cutoff scale.

free parameters (1)
  • brick-wall cutoff radius
    A short-distance cutoff placed just outside each horizon; its precise value is chosen to regulate the mode density but is not fitted to data in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quantum field theory on a fixed curved background is valid near the horizons.
    Invoked when the normal modes of the massless scalar are computed in the given geometries.
  • domain assumption WKB approximation accurately captures the near-horizon spectrum when tunneling is exponentially suppressed.
    Used to separate the two horizon sectors in the Schwarzschild-de Sitter case.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5581 in / 1455 out tokens · 25345 ms · 2026-05-13T23:59:25.145539+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum scars from holographic boson stars

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Asymptotically AdS mini-boson stars exhibit scar-like states with random-matrix chaos signatures, embedded integrable branches, low entanglement, and Krylov complexity revivals, unlike thermal black holes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and the second law,Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985)4 (Aug, 1972) 737–740

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle creation by black holes,Communications In Mathematical Physics 43(aug, 1975) 199–220

  3. [3]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104, [hep-th/9601029]

  4. [4]

    ’t Hooft,On the quantum structure of a black hole,Nuclear Physics B256(1985) 727–745

    G. ’t Hooft,On the quantum structure of a black hole,Nuclear Physics B256(1985) 727–745

  5. [5]

    The Stretched Horizon and Black Hole Complementarity

    L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum,The Stretched horizon and black hole complementarity,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 3743–3761, [hep-th/9306069]

  6. [6]

    J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv.Theor.Math.Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

  7. [7]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,Phys. Lett.B428(1998) 105–114, [hep-th/9802109]

  8. [8]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

  9. [9]

    B. S. Kay and L. Ort´ ız,Brick Walls and AdS/CFT,Gen. Rel. Grav.46(2014) 1727, [1111.6429]

  10. [10]

    Iizuka and S

    N. Iizuka and S. Terashima,Brick Walls for Black Holes in AdS/CFT,Nucl. Phys. B895 (2015) 1–32, [1307.5933]. – 44 – 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 s p(s) (a)σ 2 0 = 0.1 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 s p(s) (b)σ 2 0 = 0.2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 s p(s) (c)σ 2 0 = 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.1...

  11. [11]

    S. Das, C. Krishnan, A. P. Kumar and A. Kundu,Synthetic fuzzballs: a linear ramp from black hole normal modes,JHEP01(2023) 153, [2208.14744]

  12. [12]

    S. Das, S. K. Garg, C. Krishnan and A. Kundu,Fuzzballs and random matrices,JHEP10 (2023) 031, [2301.11780]

  13. [13]

    Das and A

    S. Das and A. Kundu,Brickwall in rotating BTZ: a dip-ramp-plateau story,JHEP02(2024) 049, [2310.06438]

  14. [14]

    Krishnan and P

    C. Krishnan and P. S. Pathak,Normal modes of the stretched horizon: a bulk mechanism for black hole microstate level spacing,JHEP03(2024) 162, [2312.14109]

  15. [15]

    Burman, S

    V. Burman, S. Das and C. Krishnan,A smooth horizon without a smooth horizon,JHEP 2024(2024) 014, [2312.14108]. – 45 – 10-8 t 10 1000 105 107 10-5 10-4 0.001 0.010 0.100 1 t gavg(t) (a)σ 2 0 = 0.1 10-7.8 t 10 1000 105 107 10-5 10-4 0.001 0.010 0.100 1 t gavg(t) (b)σ 2 0 = 0.2 10-7.6 t 10 1000 105 107 10-5 10-4 0.001 0.010 0.100 1 t gavg(t) (c)σ 2 0 = 0.3 1...

  16. [16]

    Banerjee, S

    S. Banerjee, S. Das, M. Dorband and A. Kundu,Brickwall, normal modes, and emerging thermality,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 126020, [2401.01417]

  17. [17]

    S. Das, S. Porey and B. Roy,Brick wall in an AdS-Schwarzschild black hole: Normal modes and emerging thermality,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 106013, [2409.05519]

  18. [18]

    A Bottom-Up Approach to Black Hole Microstates,

    V. Burman and C. Krishnan,A Bottom-Up Approach to Black Hole Microstates, 2409.05850

  19. [19]

    Jeong, A

    H.-S. Jeong, A. Kundu and J. F. Pedraza,Brickwall one-loop determinant: spectral statistics & Krylov complexity,JHEP05(2025) 154, [2412.12301]

  20. [20]

    Banerjee, S

    S. Banerjee, S. Das, A. Kundu and M. Sittinger,Blackish holes,JHEP07(2025) 239, [2411.09500]. – 46 – 0 50 000 100 000 150 000 200 000 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 t C(t)/n Figure 27: Ensemble-averaged KC for the TFD state atβ= 0 andσ BH =σ C =σ 2 0 = 0.1,0.2,0.3,0.8,2,10 (black, red, blue, green, orange, gray), withω cut = 1.09 ands e/sc = 10−2.5

  21. [21]

    D. S. Ageev, V. V. Pushkarev and A. N. Zueva,Spectral form factors for curved spacetimes with a horizon,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 086012, [2412.19672]

  22. [22]

    Jeong, K.-Y

    H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, G. Yun and H. Yu,Brickwall model for hyperbolic black holes and chaos,2510.00886

  23. [23]

    C´ aceres, S

    E. C´ aceres, S. Das, A. Kundu and H. P. Balaji,Blackish Holes with Stringy Backreaction, 2510.03498

  24. [24]

    Holography, Brick Wall and a Little Hierarchy Problem

    V. Gayari, C. Krishnan and P. S. Pathak,Holography, Brick Wall and a Little Hierarchy Problem,2603.23108

  25. [25]

    Holography with an Inner Boundary: A Smooth Horizon as a Sum over Horizonless States,

    C. Krishnan and P. S. Pathak,Holography with an Inner Boundary: A Smooth Horizon as a Sum over Horizonless States,2601.18775

  26. [26]

    S. Das, S. K. Garg, C. Krishnan and A. Kundu,What is the Simplest Linear Ramp?,JHEP 01(2024) 172, [2308.11704]

  27. [27]

    AdS/CFT duality and the black hole information paradox

    O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur,AdS / CFT duality and the black hole information paradox, Nucl. Phys. B623(2002) 342–394, [hep-th/0109154]

  28. [28]

    Fuzzballs with internal excitations

    I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis and M. Taylor,Fuzzballs with internal excitations,JHEP06 (2007) 056, [0704.0690]

  29. [29]

    I. Bena, S. Giusto, R. Russo, M. Shigemori and N. P. Warner,Habemus Superstratum! A constructive proof of the existence of superstrata,JHEP05(2015) 110, [1503.01463]

  30. [30]

    J. S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S. H. Shenker et al.,Black Holes and Random Matrices,JHEP05(2017) 118, [1611.04650]

  31. [31]

    Y. Chen, H. W. Lin and S. H. Shenker,BPS chaos,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 072, [2407.19387]

  32. [32]

    Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity

    G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,gr-qc/9310026

  33. [33]

    The World as a Hologram

    L. Susskind,The World as a hologram,J.Math.Phys.36(1995) 6377–6396, [hep-th/9409089]

  34. [34]

    A bound on chaos

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A bound on chaos,JHEP08(2016) 106, [1503.01409]. – 47 –

  35. [35]

    D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford and L. Susskind,Localized shocks,JHEP03(2015) 051, [1409.8180]

  36. [36]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Black holes and the butterfly effect,JHEP03(2014) 067, [1306.0622]

  37. [37]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Multiple Shocks,JHEP12(2014) 046, [1312.3296]

  38. [38]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Stringy effects in scrambling,JHEP05(2015) 132, [1412.6087]

  39. [39]

    Black hole scrambling from hydrodynamics

    S. Grozdanov, K. Schalm and V. Scopelliti,Black hole scrambling from hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 231601, [1710.00921]

  40. [40]

    A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos

    M. Blake, H. Lee and H. Liu,A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos,JHEP10(2018) 127, [1801.00010]

  41. [41]

    Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography

    M. Blake, R. A. Davison, S. Grozdanov and H. Liu,Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography,JHEP10(2018) 035, [1809.01169]

  42. [42]

    Jeong, K.-Y

    H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and Y.-W. Sun,Bound of diffusion constants from pole-skipping points: spontaneous symmetry breaking and magnetic field,JHEP07(2021) 105, [2104.13084]

  43. [43]

    Les Houches Lectures on De Sitter Space

    M. Spradlin, A. Strominger and A. Volovich,Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space, in Unity from duality: Gravity, gauge theory and strings. Proceedings, NATO Advanced Study Institute, Euro Summer School, 76th session, Les Houches, France, July 30-August 31, 2001, pp. 423–453, 2001.hep-th/0110007

  44. [44]

    Anninos,De Sitter Musings,Int

    D. Anninos,De Sitter Musings,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A27(2012) 1230013, [1205.3855]

  45. [45]

    D. A. Galante,Modave lectures on de Sitter space & holography,PoSModave2022(2023) 003, [2306.10141]

  46. [46]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking,Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2738–2751

  47. [47]

    The dS/CFT Correspondence

    A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP10(2001) 034, [hep-th/0106113]

  48. [48]

    Susskind,Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example, JHAP1(2021) 1 [2109.14104]

    L. Susskind,Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example, JHAP1(2021) 1–22, [2109.14104]

  49. [49]

    Addendum to Fast Scramblers

    L. Susskind,Addendum to Fast Scramblers,1101.6048

  50. [50]

    Anninos, D

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante and D. M. Hofman,De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids, JHEP07(2019) 038, [1811.08153]

  51. [51]

    Aalsma and G

    L. Aalsma and G. Shiu,Chaos and complementarity in de Sitter space,JHEP05(2020) 152, [2002.01326]

  52. [52]

    D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu,Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon, 2411.08090

  53. [53]

    Y. Ahn, S. Grozdanov, H.-S. Jeong and J. F. Pedraza,Cosmological pole-skipping, shock waves and quantum chaotic dynamics of de Sitter horizons,2508.15589

  54. [54]

    M. V. Berry and M. Robnik,Semiclassical level spacings when regular and chaotic orbits coexist,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General17(1984) 2413–2421. – 48 –

  55. [55]

    Prosen and M

    T. Prosen and M. Robnik,Semiclassical energy level statistics in the transition region between integrability and chaos,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General26(1993) 2371–2387

  56. [56]

    Prosen and M

    T. Prosen and M. Robnik,Energy level statistics in the transition region between integrability and chaos,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General27(1994) 8059–8077

  57. [57]

    Prosen,On general relation between quantum ergodicity and classical ergodicity,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General31(1998) 7023–7053

    T. Prosen,On general relation between quantum ergodicity and classical ergodicity,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General31(1998) 7023–7053

  58. [58]

    Prosen and M

    T. Prosen and M. Robnik,Energy level statistics of a strongly chaotic system in a mixed regular–chaotic regime,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General32(1999) 1863–1874

  59. [59]

    Amore, L

    P. Amore, L. A. Pando Zayas, J. F. Pedraza, N. Quiroz and C. A. Terrero-Escalante,Fuzzy spheres in stringy matrix models: quantifying chaos in a mixed phase space,JHEP06(2025) 031, [2407.07259]

  60. [60]

    Huh, H.-S

    K.-B. Huh, H.-S. Jeong, L. A. Pando Zayas and J. F. Pedraza,Krylov complexity in mixed phase space,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L121902, [2412.04963]

  61. [61]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, J. M. Magan and Q. Wu,Quantum chaos and the complexity of spread of states,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 046007, [2202.06957]

  62. [62]

    Caputa, H.-S

    P. Caputa, H.-S. Jeong, S. Liu, J. F. Pedraza and L.-C. Qu,Krylov complexity of density matrix operators,JHEP05(2024) 337, [2402.09522]

  63. [63]

    Baggioli, K.-B

    M. Baggioli, K.-B. Huh, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and J. F. Pedraza,Krylov complexity as an order parameter for quantum chaotic-integrable transitions,Phys. Rev. Res.7(2025) 023028, [2407.17054]

  64. [64]

    Baggioli, K.-B

    M. Baggioli, K.-B. Huh, H.-S. Jeong, X. Jiang, K.-Y. Kim and J. F. Pedraza,Quantum Chaos Diagnostics for non-Hermitian Systems from Bi-Lanczos Krylov Dynamics,2508.13956

  65. [65]

    D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi and E. Altman,A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis,Phys. Rev. X9(2019) 041017, [1812.08657]

  66. [66]

    Nandy, A

    P. Nandy, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Mart´ ınez-Azcona, A. Dymarsky and A. del Campo, Quantum dynamics in Krylov space: Methods and applications,Phys. Rept.1125-1128 (2025) 1–82, [2405.09628]

  67. [67]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,Krylov Complexity,2507.06286

  68. [68]

    Jeong and J

    H.-S. Jeong and J. F. Pedraza,Quantum chaos and spread of states in krylov subspace: A topical review (to appear, 2026),

  69. [69]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,A bulk manifestation of Krylov complexity,JHEP08(2023) 213, [2305.04355]

  70. [70]

    H. W. Lin,The bulk Hilbert space of double scaled SYK,JHEP11(2022) 060, [2208.07032]

  71. [71]

    M. P. Heller, J. Papalini and T. Schuhmann,Krylov Spread Complexity as Holographic Complexity beyond Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 151602, [2412.17785]

  72. [72]

    Ambrosini, E

    M. Ambrosini, E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,Operator K-complexity in DSSYK: Krylov complexity equals bulk length,JHEP08(2025) 059, [2412.15318]. – 49 –

  73. [73]

    S.-K. Jian, B. Swingle and Z.-Y. Xian,Complexity growth of operators in the SYK model and in JT gravity,JHEP03(2021) 014, [2008.12274]

  74. [74]

    Caputa, B

    P. Caputa, B. Chen, R. W. McDonald, J. Sim´ on and B. Strittmatter,Spread complexity rate as proper momentum,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) L041901, [2410.23334]

  75. [75]

    Toward Krylov-based holography in double-scaled SYK

    Y. Fu, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and J. F. Pedraza,Toward Krylov-based holography in double-scaled SYK,2510.22658

  76. [76]

    Krylov Subspace Dynamics as Near-Horizon AdS$_2$ Holography

    H.-S. Jeong,Krylov Subspace Dynamics as Near-Horizon AdS 2 Holography,2602.11627

  77. [77]

    Balasubramanian, J

    V. Balasubramanian, J. M. Magan, P. Nandi and Q. Wu,Spread complexity and the saturation of wormhole size,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 046004, [2412.02038]

  78. [78]

    Lanczos,An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators,J

    C. Lanczos,An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators,J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. B45(1950) 255–282

  79. [79]

    V. S. Viswanath and G. M¨ uller,The Recursion Method: Application to Many Body Dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media, Aug., 1994

  80. [80]

    Erdmenger, S.-K

    J. Erdmenger, S.-K. Jian and Z.-Y. Xian,Universal chaotic dynamics from Krylov space, JHEP08(2023) 176, [2303.12151]

Showing first 80 references.