pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.29502 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-31 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Distribution function-based modelling of discrete kinematic datasets, in application to the Milky Way nuclear star cluster

Anja Feldmeier-Krause, Eugene Vasiliev, Mattia C. Sormani

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 23:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Milky Way nuclear star clustercentral black hole massdistribution function modelingdiscrete kinematic datastellar dynamicsproper motionsline-of-sight velocities
0
0 comments X

The pith

A distribution-function method applied to discrete star velocities measures the Milky Way central black hole at 4 million solar masses and the enclosed mass within 10 parsecs at 2.0 to 2.3 times 10 to the 7 solar masses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a modeling technique that constructs distribution functions for stellar systems and fits them directly to individual kinematic measurements such as line-of-sight velocities and proper motions. The approach produces usable constraints on the underlying mass distribution even when neither the spatial density of the observed stars nor the survey selection function is known in advance. Application to a few thousand stars within 10 parsecs of the Milky Way center, after separate accounting for the nuclear stellar disc and Galactic bar, yields a central black hole mass of 4 times 10 to the 6 solar masses with 10 percent uncertainty together with a robust total mass in the same volume.

Core claim

The authors demonstrate that distribution functions constrained by discrete kinematic data recover the gravitational potential of the nuclear star cluster plus central black hole, giving a black hole mass of 4 times 10 to the 6 solar masses with 10 percent uncertainty that agrees with GRAVITY results while the total mass within 10 parsecs remains between 2.0 and 2.3 times 10 to the 7 solar masses across all model variants.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the construction of distribution functions that directly encode the phase-space distribution of stars and are fitted to the observed positions and velocities, thereby inferring the gravitational potential without an assumed density profile or selection function.

If this is right

  • The total mass within 10 parsecs remains tightly constrained regardless of which subset of kinematic data is used.
  • The method supplies mass constraints in regimes where only sparse velocity measurements exist.
  • The public models released in the Agama framework allow direct reuse for further dynamical studies of the same cluster.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fitting procedure could be applied to discrete kinematic catalogs of other galactic nuclei to estimate their central masses.
  • Running the method on mock datasets drawn from known potentials would quantify how sensitive the recovered masses are to incomplete knowledge of the selection function.

Load-bearing premise

The nuclear stellar disc and Galactic bar contributions can be subtracted or modeled separately so that the remaining discrete data reflect only the nuclear star cluster and central black hole.

What would settle it

An independent black-hole mass measurement from stellar-orbit fitting that lies outside the reported 10 percent uncertainty range around 4 times 10 to the 6 solar masses would show the model recovery is inaccurate for this system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.29502 by Anja Feldmeier-Krause, Eugene Vasiliev, Mattia C. Sormani.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of constraining the potential using the 1d toy model (Section 3.2.1) of a two-component tracer population with different velocity dispersions. Left and centre column demonstrate the basic idea: the density profiles ρ⋆(z) of both components depend on the potential Φ(z) through Equation 8b, but this dependence is stronger for the colder component (blue) than for the warmer one (red). Centre colu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the dynamical modelling precision in different scenarios using the toy spherical model (Section 3.2.2). Shown are constraints on the mass density (left and middle columns) and tracer density (right column), in the cases when the spatial selection function is known and uniform (scenario A in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left half: Illustration of the full 3d velocity distribution shown as its 2d projections (bottom left corner) and 1d projections (diagonal panels) at a location X = 3 pc, Y = 2 pc from one of the models in the MCMC chain. Details to note are the obviously non-Gaussian shape of marginalised 1d distribution and non-elliptical contours in the 2d distributions, a slight tilt of the Vhor–Vver distribution (midd… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Test of modelling machinery on the mock data generated from the fiducial model with parameters given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spatial coverage of the observational dataset, which is essentially the same as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Position–velocity diagrams of stars with kine￾matic measurements after applying quality cuts described in the text. Top panel shows the horizontal velocity Vhor ≡ D0 µl, middle panel – vertical velocity Vver ≡ D0 µb, and bottom panel – line-of-sight velocity VLOS. The con￾version from PM to velocity uses D0 = 8.2 kpc. Stars are coloured by the probability of being kinematic outliers (i.e. belong to the con… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Structural properties of the models. Blue and cyan shaded regions show the V series of models fitted to a combination of Fritz et al. (2016) and VIRAC2 (Smith et al. 2025) PM data, red and yellow show the F series fitted only to the former catalogue. The left panel shows the enclosed mass profile as a function of spherical radius (red/blue – NSC only, cyan/yellow – also including NSD and SMBH), the middle … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of log-likelihoods of F (red/orange) and V series of models. Horizontal/vertical axes show the log-likelihoods of the entire dataset (including VIRAC2 PM) and the kinematic data excluding VIRAC2 PM, which are the objective functions in the V and F series, respectively. Values are shifted by a constant, so that the fiducial model (marked by a black dot) is at the origin. There is only a marginal … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Kinematic properties and shape of the V series (blue and cyan) and F series (red and yellow) of models, as well as the fiducial model (black dotted lines). Left panel: 1d velocity dispersion (mean of all three components, top curves) and mean VLOS (bottom curves) as functions of radius along the projected major axis (X). Middle panel: the ratio of horizontal (top) and vertical (bottom) velocity dispersion… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Corner plot of all 12 model parameters (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Velocity distributions in the fiducial model (smooth curves) compared to the observed velocity histograms. Each row corresponds to one spatial region, as shown in the left column (red/blue points are stars with/without PM). In the remaining columns, the observed velocity distributions of stars in this region (Vhor, Vver, VLOS) are shown by histograms with Poisson uncertainties (black), and the VDFs in the… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Velocity distributions (continued) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a method for constructing dynamical models of stellar systems described by distribution functions and constrained by discrete-kinematic data. We implement various improvements compared to earlier applications of this approach, demonstrating with several examples that it can deliver meaningful constraints on the mass distribution even in situations when the density profile of tracers and the selection function of the kinematic catalogue are unknown. We then apply this method to the Milky Way nuclear star cluster, using kinematic data (line-of-sight velocities and proper motions) for a few thousand stars within 10 pc from the central black hole, accounting for the contributions of the nuclear stellar disc and the Galactic bar. We measure the mass of the black hole to be 4x10^6 Msun with a 10% uncertainty, which agrees with the more precise value obtained by the GRAVITY instrument. The inferred stellar mass profile depends on the choice of kinematic data, but the total mass within 10 pc is well constrained in all models to be (2.0-2.3)x10^7 Msun. We make our models publicly available as part of the Agama software framework for galactic dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an improved distribution-function (DF) based method for dynamical modeling of stellar systems from discrete kinematic datasets (line-of-sight velocities and proper motions). The approach is shown to recover meaningful mass constraints even when the tracer density profile and selection function are unknown. After testing on several examples, the method is applied to the Milky Way nuclear star cluster using a few thousand stars within 10 pc, after subtracting contributions from the nuclear stellar disc and Galactic bar. The central black hole mass is measured as 4×10^6 M⊙ (10% uncertainty), consistent with GRAVITY, while the total mass within 10 pc is robustly constrained to (2.0–2.3)×10^7 M⊙ across different kinematic subsets. The models are released publicly within the Agama framework.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a practical, publicly available DF-modeling pipeline that can deliver stable enclosed-mass estimates from discrete kinematics in galactic nuclei even under incomplete knowledge of the tracer distribution. The agreement with the independent GRAVITY black-hole mass and the cross-subset stability of the total mass within 10 pc constitute concrete, falsifiable outputs that strengthen the method’s credibility for future applications to other nuclear clusters or dwarf galaxies.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase “a few thousand stars” is imprecise; if the exact sample size after quality cuts is stated in §3 or Table 1, repeating the number in the abstract would improve clarity.
  2. [§4 (application section)] The description of how the nuclear stellar disc and Galactic bar contributions are subtracted (or jointly modeled) is stated but lacks a quantitative sensitivity test; a brief paragraph or supplementary figure showing the effect on the recovered total mass when the subtraction parameters are varied by ±1σ would strengthen the robustness claim.
  3. [Throughout] Notation: the paper uses both “M_BH” and “M_•” for the black-hole mass; consistent use of a single symbol throughout the text and figures would reduce minor confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review, accurate summary of the method and results, and recommendation to accept the manuscript. We appreciate the recognition of the practical value of the publicly available DF-modeling pipeline and the robustness of the mass constraints.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper develops a DF-based fitting method for discrete kinematic data and applies it to the Milky Way nuclear star cluster after subtracting nuclear disc and bar contributions. The reported black-hole mass and total enclosed mass within 10 pc are obtained by direct parameter fitting to observed velocities and proper motions; these quantities remain stable across kinematic subsets and agree with independent GRAVITY measurements. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the inputs via self-definition, renaming of fitted quantities as predictions, or unverified self-citation chains. The derivation is self-contained, with results externally falsifiable against other instruments.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The modeling rests on standard assumptions of dynamical equilibrium and a separable DF form; the mass profile parameters are fitted to the kinematic data. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • black-hole mass
    Fitted directly to the discrete velocity data; reported with 10% uncertainty.
  • stellar mass profile parameters
    Shape parameters of the DF that are adjusted to match the observed kinematics; their exact number is not stated in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The stellar system is in dynamical equilibrium and can be described by a steady-state distribution function.
    Invoked throughout the modeling procedure described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Contributions from the nuclear stellar disc and Galactic bar can be subtracted or modeled independently without biasing the nuclear cluster mass estimate.
    Explicitly stated as part of the application to the Milky Way data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5515 in / 1551 out tokens · 54217 ms · 2026-05-13T23:53:24.733850+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2006, in SPIE Conf

    Amorim, A., Lima, J., Alves, J., et al. 2006, in SPIE Conf. series, Vol. 6269, 626957, doi: 10.1117/12.671746

    work page doi:10.1117/12.671746 2006

  2. [2]

    H., & Evans, N

    An, J. H., & Evans, N. W. 2006, ApJ, 642, 752, doi: 10.1086/501040

    work page doi:10.1086/501040 2006

  3. [3]

    M., Pascale, R., Battaglia, G., et al

    Arroyo-Polonio, J. M., Pascale, R., Battaglia, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A347, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554826 Ba˜ nares-Hern´ andez, A., Calore, F., Martin Camalich, J., &

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554826 2025

  4. [4]

    Read, J. I. 2025, A&A, 693, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451763 Ba˜ nares-Hern´ andez, A., Read, J. I., & J´ ulio, M. P. 2026, A&A, 705, A212, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557195

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451763 2025

  5. [5]

    A., & Norris, R

    Baes, M., Dejonghe, H., & De Rijcke, S. 2000, MNRAS, 318, 798, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03834.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03834.x 2000

  6. [6]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Binney, J. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 2318, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15845.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15845.x 2010

  7. [7]

    F., Quataert, E., & Murray, N

    Binney, J. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1324, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21757.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21757.x 2012

  8. [8]

    2014, MNRAS, 440, 787, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu297

    Binney, J. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 787, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu297

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu297 2014

  9. [9]

    2026, arXiv:2602.23127, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.23127

    Binney, J. 2026, arXiv:2602.23127, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.23127

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.23127 2026

  10. [10]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Binney, J., & McMillan, P. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1889, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18268.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18268.x 2011

  11. [11]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 3653, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2225

    Binney, J., & Piffl, T. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3653, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2225

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2225 2015

  12. [12]

    2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition (Princeton University press)

    Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition (Princeton University press)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 1832, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad094

    Binney, J., & Vasiliev, E. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 1832, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad094

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad094 2023

  14. [14]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 1915, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3312

    Binney, J., & Vasiliev, E. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 1915, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3312

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3312 2024

  15. [15]

    2004, The Messenger, 117, 17

    Bonnet, H., Abuter, R., Baker, A., et al. 2004, The Messenger, 117, 17

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    2013, ApJ, 779, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/115 Chanam´ e, J., Kleyna, J., & van der Marel, R

    Bovy, J., & Rix, H.-W. 2013, ApJ, 779, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/115 Chanam´ e, J., Kleyna, J., & van der Marel, R. 2008, ApJ, 682, 841, doi: 10.1086/589429

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/779/2/115 2013

  17. [17]

    K., Gerhard, O., et al

    Chatzopoulos, S., Fritz, T. K., Gerhard, O., et al. 2015a, MNRAS, 447, 948, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2452

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2452

  18. [18]

    K., et al

    Chatzopoulos, S., Gerhard, O., Fritz, T. K., et al. 2015b, MNRAS, 453, 939, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1681

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1681

  19. [19]

    R., & Binney, J

    Cole, D. R., & Binney, J. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 798, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2775

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2775 2017

  20. [20]

    2016, MNRAS, 460, 1725, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw744

    Das, P., & Binney, J. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1725, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw744

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw744 2016

  21. [21]

    I., Agudo Berbel, A., Wiezorrek, E., et al

    Davies, R. I., Agudo Berbel, A., Wiezorrek, E., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322282 Della Croce, A., Pascale, R., Giunchi, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347569 den Brok, M., van de Ven, G., van den Bosch, R., &

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322282 2013

  22. [22]

    2014, MNRAS, 438, 487, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2221

    Watkins, L. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 487, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2221

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2221 2014

  23. [23]

    R., Ghez, A

    Do, T., Lu, J. R., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2013a, ApJ, 764, 154, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/154

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/154

  24. [24]

    D., Yelda, S., et al

    Do, T., Martinez, G. D., Yelda, S., et al. 2013b, ApJL, 779, L6, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/779/1/L6

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/779/1/l6 2041

  25. [25]

    2003, in SPIE Conf

    Eisenhauer, F., Abuter, R., Bickert, K., et al. 2003, in SPIE Conf. series, Vol. 4841, 1548, doi: 10.1117/12.459468 22 Eugene, & Neige, 2026, arXiv:2603.29503, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.29503

    work page doi:10.1117/12.459468 2003

  26. [26]

    2014, A&A, 570, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423777

    Feldmeier, A., Neumayer, N., Seth, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423777

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423777 2014

  27. [27]

    2017a, MNRAS, 464, 194, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2339

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Kerzendorf, W., Neumayer, N., et al. 2017a, MNRAS, 464, 194, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2339

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2339

  28. [28]

    2017b, MNRAS, 466, 4040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3377

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Zhu, L., Neumayer, N., et al. 2017b, MNRAS, 466, 4040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3377

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3377

  29. [29]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 396, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa703

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Kerzendorf, W., Do, T., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 396, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa703

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa703 2020

  30. [30]

    2025, A&A, 699, A239, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554630

    Gallego-Cano, E., & Neumayer, N. 2025, A&A, 699, A239, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554630

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554630 2025

  31. [31]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , author =

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  32. [32]

    K., Chatzopoulos, S., Gerhard, O., et al

    Fritz, T. K., Chatzopoulos, S., Gerhard, O., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 44, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/44 Gal´ an-de Anta, P. M., Vasiliev, E., Sarzi, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 4490, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad419

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/44 2016

  33. [33]

    2018, A&A, 609, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730451

    Gallego-Cano, E., Sch¨ odel, R., Dong, H., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730451

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730451 2018

  34. [34]

    2020, A&A, 634, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935303

    Gallego-Cano, E., Sch¨ odel, R., Nogueras-Lara, F., et al. 2020, A&A, 634, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935303

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935303 2020

  35. [35]

    2010, Rev

    Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Gillessen, S. 2010, Rev. Mod. Phys., 82, 3121, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3121 2010

  36. [36]

    2026, MNRAS, 546, stag254, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag254

    Gherghinescu, P., Vasiliev, E., Das, P., & Read, J. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag254, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag254

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag254 2026

  37. [37]

    M., Salim, S., Weinberg, N

    Ghez, A. M., Salim, S., Weinberg, N. N., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 1044, doi: 10.1086/592738

    work page doi:10.1086/592738 2008

  38. [38]

    E., Northcott, M

    Graves, J. E., Northcott, M. J., Roddier, F. J., Roddier, C. A., & Close, L. M. 1998, in SPIE Conf. series, Vol. 3353, 34, doi: 10.1117/12.321698 GRAVITY Collaboration. 2018, A&A, 615, L15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833718 GRAVITY Collaboration. 2019, A&A, 625, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935656 GRAVITY Collaboration. 2020, A&A, 636, L5, doi: 10.1051/0...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.321698 1998

  39. [39]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 5468, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2898

    Hattori, K., Valluri, M., & Vasiliev, E. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 5468, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2898 2021

  40. [40]

    L., Hall, D

    Hodapp, K.-W., Hora, J. L., Hall, D. N. B., et al. 1996, NewA, 1, 177, doi: 10.1016/S1384-1076(96)00013-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s1384-1076(96)00013-9 1996

  41. [41]

    A., Zasowski, G., et al

    Imig, J., Holtzman, J. A., Zasowski, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf723

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf723 2025

  42. [42]

    Johnson, S. G. 2005, Multi-dimensional adaptive integration in C: The Cubature package, https://github.com/stevengj/cubature

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    1989, MNRAS, 239, 571, doi: 10.1093/mnras/239.2.571

    Kuijken, K., & Gilmore, G. 1989, MNRAS, 239, 571, doi: 10.1093/mnras/239.2.571

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/239.2.571 1989

  44. [44]

    2003, in SPIE Conf

    Lenzen, R., Hartung, M., Brandner, W., et al. 2003, in SPIE Conf. series, Vol. 4841, 944, doi: 10.1117/12.460044

    work page doi:10.1117/12.460044 2003

  45. [45]

    1995, MNRAS, 277, 1185, doi: 10.1093/mnras/277.4.1185

    Magorrian, J. 1995, MNRAS, 277, 1185, doi: 10.1093/mnras/277.4.1185

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/277.4.1185 1995

  46. [46]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 1166, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz037

    Magorrian, J. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 1166, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz037

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz037 2019

  47. [47]

    2004, in SPIE Conf

    Marchetti, E., Brast, R., Delabre, B., et al. 2004, in SPIE Conf. series, Vol. 5490, 236, doi: 10.1117/12.551185

    work page doi:10.1117/12.551185 2004

  48. [48]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    McMillan, P. J., & Binney, J. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2251, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19879.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19879.x 2012

  49. [49]

    J., & Binney, J

    McMillan, P. J., & Binney, J. J. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1411, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt814

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt814 2013

  50. [50]

    R., & Kent, S

    Merrifield, M. R., & Kent, S. M. 1990, AJ, 99, 1548, doi: 10.1086/115438

    work page doi:10.1086/115438 1990

  51. [51]

    1995, Nature, 373, 127, doi: 10.1038/373127a0

    Miyoshi, M., Moran, J., Herrnstein, J., et al. 1995, Nature, 373, 127, doi: 10.1038/373127a0

    work page doi:10.1038/373127a0 1995

  52. [52]

    2020, A&A Rv, 28, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0

    Neumayer, N., Seth, A., & B¨ oker, T. 2020, A&A Rv, 28, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0 2020

  53. [53]

    2021, A&A, 653, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140996

    Nogueras-Lara, F., Sch¨ odel, R., & Neumayer, N. 2021, A&A, 653, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140996

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140996 2021

  54. [54]

    2018, MNRAS, 480, 927, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1860

    Pascale, R., Posti, L., Nipoti, C., & Binney, J. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 927, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1860

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1860 2018

  55. [55]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 2423, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1617

    Pascale, R., Binney, J., Nipoti, C., & Posti, L. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 2423, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1617

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1617 2019

  56. [56]

    2024, A&A, 684, L19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449620

    Pascale, R., Nipoti, C., Calura, F., & Della Croce, A. 2024, A&A, 684, L19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449620

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449620 2024

  57. [57]

    2025, A&A, 700, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555004

    Pascale, R., Nipoti, C., Calura, F., & Della Croce, A. 2025, A&A, 700, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555004

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555004 2025

  58. [58]

    J., et al

    Piffl, T., Binney, J., McMillan, P. J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3133, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1948

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1948 2014

  59. [59]

    2015, MNRAS, 451, 639, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv938

    Piffl, T., Penoyre, Z., & Binney, J. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 639, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv938

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv938 2015

  60. [60]

    2017, MNRAS, 465, 1621, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2819

    Portail, M., Gerhard, O., Wegg, C., & Ness, M. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 1621, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2819

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2819 2017

  61. [61]

    2015, MNRAS, 447, 3060, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2608

    Posti, L., Binney, J., Nipoti, C., & Ciotti, L. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 3060, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2608

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2608 2015

  62. [62]

    I., & Steger, P

    Read, J. I., & Steger, P. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 4541, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1798

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1798 2017

  63. [63]

    I., Mamon, G

    Read, J. I., Mamon, G. A., Vasiliev, E., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 978, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3663

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3663 2021

  64. [64]

    J., & Brunthaler, A

    Reid, M. J., & Brunthaler, A. 2020, ApJ, 892, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab76cd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab76cd 2020

  65. [65]

    2013, MNRAS, 432, 3361, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt686 23

    Richardson, T., & Fairbairn, M. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 3361, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt686 23

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt686 2013

  66. [66]

    2003, in SPIE Conf

    Rousset, G., Lacombe, F., Puget, P., et al. 2003, in SPIE Conf. series, Vol. 4839, 140, doi: 10.1117/12.459332

    work page doi:10.1117/12.459332 2003

  67. [67]

    L., & Binney, J

    Sanders, J. L., & Binney, J. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3479, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv578

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv578 2015

  68. [68]

    L., & Evans, N

    Sanders, J. L., & Evans, N. W. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 299, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1898 Sch¨ odel, R., Merritt, D., & Eckart, A. 2009, A&A, 502, 91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200810922 Sch¨ odel, R., Feldmeier, A., Kunneriath, D., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423481 Sch¨ odel, R., Gallego-Cano, E., Dong, H., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A27, doi:...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1898 2015

  69. [69]

    Q., Jiang, B

    Schultheis, M., Chen, B. Q., Jiang, B. W., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322788

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322788 2014

  70. [70]

    C., & Gadotti, D

    Schultheis, M., Sormani, M. C., & Gadotti, D. A. 2025, A&A Rv, 33, 7, doi: 10.1007/s00159-025-00163-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-025-00163-6 2025

  71. [71]

    1979, ApJ, 232, 236, doi: 10.1086/157282

    Schwarzschild, M. 1979, ApJ, 232, 236, doi: 10.1086/157282

    work page doi:10.1086/157282 1979

  72. [72]

    2013, The Messenger, 151, 21

    Sharples, R., Bender, R., Agudo Berbel, A., et al. 2013, The Messenger, 151, 21

    work page 2013

  73. [73]

    C., Lucas, P

    Smith, L. C., Lucas, P. W., Koposov, S. E., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 3707, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2797

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2797 2025

  74. [74]

    C., Magorrian, J., Nogueras-Lara, F., et al

    Sormani, M. C., Magorrian, J., Nogueras-Lara, F., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 7, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2785

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2785 2020

  75. [75]

    C., Sanders, J

    Sormani, M. C., Sanders, J. L., Fritz, T. K., et al. 2022a, MNRAS, 512, 1857, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac639

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac639

  76. [76]

    2022b, MNRAS, 514, L1, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slac046

    Clarke, J. 2022b, MNRAS, 514, L1, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slac046

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slac046

  77. [77]

    2013, MNRAS, 434, 652, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1053

    Ting, Y.-S., Rix, H.-W., Bovy, J., & van de Ven, G. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 652, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1053

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1053 2013

  78. [78]

    H., Bovy, J., & Rix, H.-W

    Trick, W. H., Bovy, J., & Rix, H.-W. 2016, ApJ, 830, 97, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/97

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/2/97 2016

  79. [79]

    2019a, MNRAS, 482, 1525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2672

    Vasiliev, E. 2019a, MNRAS, 482, 1525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2672

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2672

  80. [80]

    2019b, MNRAS, 484, 2832, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz171

    Vasiliev, E. 2019b, MNRAS, 484, 2832, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz171

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz171

Showing first 80 references.