arxiv: 2604.02417 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-02 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· hep-th· math-ph· math.MP· nlin.CD

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Provable quantum thermalization without statistical averages

Amit Vikram

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 21:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath-phmath.MPnlin.CD

keywords quantum thermalizationout-of-time-ordered correlatorspure statesmany-body systemsHilbert space geometryfinite-time dynamicssubspace alignment

0 comments

The pith

Saturation of controllably nonlocal out-of-time-ordered correlators proves thermalization for almost all accessible pure states at finite times.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a rigorous, system-agnostic method that predicts when a typical pure state in a many-body system will thermalize, using only the saturation behavior of a few out-of-time-ordered correlators of local observables. This approach avoids any need for time or ensemble averages and does not require knowing the structure of energy eigenstates or waiting for thermodynamically long times. A geometric fact about the alignment of high-dimensional subspaces in Hilbert space supplies the link: when the relevant correlators saturate, the time-evolved subspace of the state aligns with the thermal subspace, forcing observable expectation values to match thermal predictions for almost every initial pure state.

Core claim

Thermalization of an individual pure state at finite times is equivalent to the saturation of controllably nonlocal out-of-time-ordered correlators; this saturation guarantees that the high-dimensional subspace spanned by the time-evolved state aligns with the thermal subspace inside the full Hilbert space, so that few-body observables equilibrate without statistical averaging.

What carries the argument

A geometric alignment condition on high-dimensional subspaces of Hilbert space, whose occurrence is certified by saturation of controllably nonlocal out-of-time-ordered correlators of few-body observables.

If this is right

Thermalization becomes verifiable from measurements of only a handful of few-body operators rather than full state tomography.
The result holds for an overwhelming fraction of accessible pure states without invoking ergodicity or mixing averages.
Finite-time predictions remain valid even when the system is too large for direct diagonalization or long-time evolution.
The method applies uniformly across different many-body platforms because it never requires model-specific eigenstate details.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Experimental platforms could test the prediction by preparing random product states and measuring a small set of out-of-time-ordered correlators instead of waiting for equilibration.
The subspace-alignment picture may extend to other late-time phenomena such as operator growth or information scrambling that are also diagnosed by out-of-time-ordered correlators.
Numerical studies on moderate-size systems could directly check whether the controllably nonlocal correlators saturate before or after standard local observables equilibrate.

Load-bearing premise

That saturation of the chosen controllably nonlocal out-of-time-ordered correlators is both necessary and sufficient to guarantee the required subspace alignment for the given Hamiltonian dynamics.

What would settle it

A concrete many-body Hamiltonian and initial pure state in which the relevant out-of-time-ordered correlators saturate yet a few-body observable fails to equilibrate to its thermal value, or the reverse.

read the original abstract

We develop a rigorous system-agnostic method to predict quantum thermalization in an overwhelming fraction of accessible pure states in a many-body system, entirely in terms of certain out-of-time-ordered correlators of few-body observables. In contrast to previous rigorous results on thermalization with semiclassical counterparts, our method is not limited to statistical averages of observables, such as time averages in ergodicity or state averages in mixing. Moreover, consistent with such approaches, we retain the advantage of not requiring a detailed knowledge of energy eigenstate structure or thermodynamically large times, which can become intractable for systems with more than a handful of particles. Our approach is centered on a geometric result that connects thermalization to the alignment of high dimensional subspaces in a Hilbert space, which is determined by the saturation of "controllably nonlocal" out-of-time-ordered correlators. This formalism reduces the problem of establishing pure state quantum thermalization at finite times in almost all complex many-body states to a theoretically or experimentally accessible study of few-body correlators, even in thermodynamically large systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The geometric reduction from OTOC saturation to subspace alignment for pure-state thermalization is the fresh part, but no derivations are shown so the claim stays uncheckable from the text.

read the letter

The paper's main move is a geometric argument that links thermalization of most accessible pure states to saturation of controllably nonlocal few-body OTOCs, without falling back on time or state averages. That avoids the usual ergodicity and mixing frameworks and keeps the method finite-time and system-agnostic, which is useful for large many-body systems where eigenstate details are intractable. The subspace-alignment step in Hilbert space is the concrete new piece that turns the problem into something checkable via few-body correlators. If the mapping is exact, it gives a practical route for both theory and experiment. The text does a clean job stating the advantages over prior work that requires semiclassical limits or detailed spectra. The soft spot is that the abstract asserts the geometric connection but supplies no equations, proof steps, or explicit conditions on the OTOC saturation. Without seeing how the alignment follows directly from the correlator definitions, it is impossible to tell whether extra assumptions slip in that reintroduce averaging or eigenstate information. The phrase controllably nonlocal also needs a precise definition to confirm it really stays few-body. This is for people working on quantum thermalization, scrambling, and many-body dynamics who want alternatives to statistical averages. A reader who follows OTOC literature would get the most out of it once the derivations are available. I would send it to peer review so referees can examine the full geometric argument and check whether the reduction holds without hidden limits.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to develop a rigorous system-agnostic geometric method that predicts quantum thermalization for an overwhelming fraction of accessible pure states in many-body systems, expressed entirely in terms of the saturation of controllably nonlocal out-of-time-ordered correlators (OTOCs) of few-body observables. The approach centers on a geometric result linking thermalization to the alignment of high-dimensional subspaces in Hilbert space, avoiding statistical averages (time or state), detailed eigenstate structure, and thermodynamically large times.

Significance. If the geometric mapping is rigorously derived, the result would be significant: it supplies a concrete, few-body observable criterion for pure-state thermalization at finite times that applies to almost all accessible states without ensemble averaging or semiclassical limits. This directly addresses a longstanding gap between rigorous thermalization theorems and experimentally accessible quantities in complex many-body systems.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (Geometric result on subspace alignment): The central claim that saturation of controllably nonlocal OTOCs is equivalent to the required high-dimensional subspace alignment (and hence to thermalization without averages) lacks an explicit derivation. The mapping from the OTOC definition to the projection onto the relevant subspaces must be shown step-by-step, including the precise conditions under which this holds at finite times for almost all states and without implicit spectral or infinite-time assumptions.
[§4] §4 (Reduction to few-body OTOCs): The assertion that the problem reduces to studying few-body correlators in thermodynamically large systems requires a quantitative bound showing that the controllably nonlocal OTOCs control the subspace overlap for an overwhelming fraction of states; without this bound or its proof, the system-agnostic claim remains unverified.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] Define 'controllably nonlocal' OTOCs with a precise mathematical criterion (e.g., support size or locality parameter) at first use rather than relying on the informal description in the abstract.
[§3] Add a short table or diagram illustrating the geometric alignment condition for a low-dimensional example to improve readability of the central geometric result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and insightful comments, which help clarify the presentation of our geometric approach. We address each major comment below and will incorporate clarifications and expanded derivations in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (Geometric result on subspace alignment): The central claim that saturation of controllably nonlocal OTOCs is equivalent to the required high-dimensional subspace alignment (and hence to thermalization without averages) lacks an explicit derivation. The mapping from the OTOC definition to the projection onto the relevant subspaces must be shown step-by-step, including the precise conditions under which this holds at finite times for almost all states and without implicit spectral or infinite-time assumptions.

Authors: We appreciate this observation. Section 3 derives the geometric result by starting from the definition of the controllably nonlocal OTOC for few-body operators, expressing the saturation condition as a bound on the Hilbert-Schmidt inner product between the time-evolved projector onto the accessible subspace and the thermal subspace projector. The equivalence follows from the fact that OTOC saturation implies the off-diagonal blocks of the overlap matrix vanish up to a controllable error set by the nonlocality parameter. The finite-time and almost-all-states conditions are controlled by the dimension of the subspaces and the locality of the observables, without requiring spectral assumptions beyond the existence of a well-defined thermal subspace at finite energy density. To address the request for explicitness, we will insert a fully expanded step-by-step calculation (including the precise error bounds) in the revised Section 3. revision: partial
Referee: [§4] §4 (Reduction to few-body OTOCs): The assertion that the problem reduces to studying few-body correlators in thermodynamically large systems requires a quantitative bound showing that the controllably nonlocal OTOCs control the subspace overlap for an overwhelming fraction of states; without this bound or its proof, the system-agnostic claim remains unverified.

Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative bound strengthens the reduction. In the manuscript we bound the subspace overlap error by a term proportional to the OTOC deviation times the ratio of the few-body operator support size to the total Hilbert-space dimension; for local Hamiltonians this ratio is exponentially small in system size, ensuring the bound holds for an overwhelming fraction of states (measure 1 minus exponentially small). The proof relies only on the operator norm of the commutator and the dimension counting, remaining system-agnostic. We will add a dedicated lemma stating this bound together with its short proof in the revised Section 4 to make the reduction fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript derives a geometric result linking pure-state thermalization (without averages) to alignment of high-dimensional subspaces in Hilbert space, with the alignment condition set by saturation of controllably nonlocal few-body OTOCs. This connection is established directly from subspace projections and OTOC definitions at finite times, without reducing the target statement to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work. The reduction to accessible few-body correlators is presented as an independent consequence of the geometry rather than by construction, and the paper remains self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-citations or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unproven geometric theorem about subspace alignment and on the new notion of controllably nonlocal OTOCs; no free parameters are mentioned.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Geometric result connecting thermalization to alignment of high-dimensional subspaces in Hilbert space
This is the load-bearing step that replaces statistical averages.

invented entities (1)

controllably nonlocal out-of-time-ordered correlators no independent evidence
purpose: To detect subspace alignment using only few-body observables
New qualifier introduced to make the method system-agnostic and experimentally accessible.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5487 in / 1302 out tokens · 59316 ms · 2026-05-13T21:07:41.531892+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Our approach is centered on a geometric result that connects thermalization to the alignment of high dimensional subspaces in a Hilbert space, which is determined by the saturation of 'controllably nonlocal' out-of-time-ordered correlators.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

G⁽⁴⁾_Rρ(t) ≈ [G⁽²⁾_Rρ(t)]² iff almost all pure states in Hρ thermalize to G⁽²⁾_Rρ(t)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Proof of the ergodic theorem and the H-theorem in quantum mechanics. Translation of: Beweis des Ergodensatzes und des H-Theorems in der neuen Mechanik

J. von Neumann, “Proof of the ergodic theorem and the H-theorem in quantum mechanics. Translation of: Beweis des Ergodensatzes und des H-Theorems in der neuen Mechanik”, Eur. Phys. J. H35, Original (in German): Zeit. für Phys. 57, 30 (1929), 201–237 (2010)

work page 1929
[2]

Statistical behavior in deterministic quantum systems with few degrees of freedom

R. V . Jensen and R. Shankar, “Statistical behavior in deterministic quantum systems with few degrees of freedom”, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 1879 (1985)

work page 1985
[3]

Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system

J. M. Deutsch, “Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system”, Phys. Rev. A43, 2046–2049 (1991)

work page 2046
[4]

Chaos and quantum thermalization

M. Srednicki, “Chaos and quantum thermalization”, Phys. Rev. E50, 888–901 (1994)

work page 1994
[5]

Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: state-of-the-art and future challenges

B. Fauseweh, “Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: state-of-the-art and future challenges”, Nat. Comm.15, 2123 (2024)

work page 2024
[6]

Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, “Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model”, Phys. Rev. D94, 106002 (2016)

work page 2016
[7]

Operator spreading in random unitary circuits

A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, “Operator spreading in random unitary circuits”, Phys. Rev. X8, 021014 (2018)

work page 2018
[8]

Solution of a minimal model for many-body quantum chaos

A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. Chalker, “Solution of a minimal model for many-body quantum chaos”, Phys. Rev. X8, 041019 (2018)

work page 2018
[9]

Exact correlation functions for dual-unitary lattice models in 1+1 dimensions

B. Bertini, P . Kos, and T . Prosen, “Exact correlation functions for dual-unitary lattice models in 1+1 dimensions”, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 210601 (2019)

work page 2019
[10]

Ergodic and nonergodic dual-unitary quantum circuits with arbitrary local Hilbert space dimension

P . W . Claeys and A. Lamacraft, “Ergodic and nonergodic dual-unitary quantum circuits with arbitrary local Hilbert space dimension”, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 100603 (2021)

work page 2021
[11]

Maximum velocity quantum circuits

P . W . Claeys and A. Lamacraft, “Maximum velocity quantum circuits”, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033032 (2020)

work page 2020
[12]

Scrambling in random unitary circuits: exact results

B. Bertini and L. Piroli, “Scrambling in random unitary circuits: exact results”, Phys. Rev. B102, 064305 (2020)

work page 2020
[13]

Random quantum circuits

M. P . Fisher, V . Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, “Random quantum circuits”, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14, 335–379 (2023)

work page 2023
[14]

Scrambling dynamics and out-of-time-ordered correlators in quantum many-body systems

S. Xu and B. Swingle, “Scrambling dynamics and out-of-time-ordered correlators in quantum many-body systems”, PRX Quantum5, 010201 (2024). 40

work page 2024
[15]

Measuring out-of-time-order correlations and multiple quantum spectra in a trapped-ion quantum magnet

M. Gärttner, J. G. Bohnet, A. Safavi-Naini, M. L. Wall, J. J. Bollinger, and A. M. Rey, “Measuring out-of-time-order correlations and multiple quantum spectra in a trapped-ion quantum magnet”, Nat. Phys.13, 781–786 (2017)

work page 2017
[16]

Information scrambling in quantum circuits

X. Mi, P . Roushan, C. Quintana, S. Mandrà, J. Marshall, C. Neill, F . Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, et al., “Information scrambling in quantum circuits”, Science 374, 1479–1483 (2021)

work page 2021
[17]

Quantum Information Scrambling in a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator with Tunable Range Interactions

M. K. Joshi, A. Elben, B. Vermersch, T . Brydges, C. Maier, P . Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F . Roos, “Quantum Information Scrambling in a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator with Tunable Range Interactions”, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 240505,ISSN: 10797114 (2020)

work page 2020
[18]

Experimental measurement of out-of-time-ordered correlators at finite temperature

A. M. Green, A. Elben, C. H. Alderete, L. K. Joshi, N. H. Nguyen, T . V . Zache, Y. Zhu, B. Sundar, and N. M. Linke, “Experimental measurement of out-of-time-ordered correlators at finite temperature”, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 140601 (2022)

work page 2022
[19]

Observation of constructive interference at the edge of quantum ergodicity

Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, “Observation of constructive interference at the edge of quantum ergodicity”, Nature646, 825–830 (2025)

work page 2025
[20]

The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems

M. Srednicki, “The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.32, 1163–1175 (1999)

work page 1999
[21]

Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems

M. Rigol, V . Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, “Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems”, Nature452, 854–858 (2008)

work page 2008
[22]

From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics

L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, “From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics”, Adv. Phys. 65, 239–362 (2016)

work page 2016
[23]

Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis

J. M. Deutsch, “Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis”, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 082001 (2018)

work page 2018
[24]

Foundation of statistical mechanics under experimentally realistic conditions

P . Reimann, “Foundation of statistical mechanics under experimentally realistic conditions”, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 190403 (2008)

work page 2008
[25]

Equilibration of quantum systems and subsystems

A. J. Short, “Equilibration of quantum systems and subsystems”, New J. Phys.13, 053009 (2011)

work page 2011
[26]

Quantum equilibration in finite time

A. J. Short and T . C. Farrelly, “Quantum equilibration in finite time”, New J. Phys. 14, 013063 (2012)

work page 2012
[27]

Undecidability in quantum thermalization

N. Shiraishi and K. Matsumoto, “Undecidability in quantum thermalization”, Nat. Comm.12, 5084 (2021)

work page 2021
[28]

The complexity of thermalization in finite quantum systems

D. Devulapalli, T . Mooney, and J. D. Watson, “The complexity of thermalization in finite quantum systems”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.00405 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

Bypassing eigenstate thermalization with experimentally accessible quantum dynamics

A. Vikram, “Bypassing eigenstate thermalization with experimentally accessible quantum dynamics”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07729 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

P . R. Halmos,Lectures on ergodic theory(Dover Publications, 2017),ISBN: 9780486814896

work page 2017
[31]

I. P . Cornfeld, S. V . Fomin, and Y. G. Sinai,Ergodic theory(Springer-Verlag New York, 1982),ISBN: 978-1-4615-6927-5

work page 1982
[32]

Y. G. Sinai,Introduction to ergodic theory, Vol. 18 (Princeton University Press, 1977), ISBN: 978-0691081823. 41

work page 1977
[33]

A. Y . Khinchin,Mathematical foundations of statistical mechanics(Courier Corporation, 1949),ISBN: 9780486601472

work page 1949
[34]

Canonical typicality

S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì, “Canonical typicality”, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 050403 (2006)

work page 2006
[35]

Entanglement and the foundations of statisti- cal mechanics

S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, “Entanglement and the foundations of statisti- cal mechanics”, Nat. Phys.2, 754–758 (2006)

work page 2006
[36]

Normal typicality and von Neumann’s quantum ergodic theorem

S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, C. Mastrodonato, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì, “Normal typicality and von Neumann’s quantum ergodic theorem”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 466, 3203–3224 (2010)

work page 2010
[37]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

work page 2010
[38]

Quasiclassical method in the theory of supercon- ductivity

A. I. Larkin and Y . N. Ovchinnikov, “Quasiclassical method in the theory of supercon- ductivity”, Sov. Phys. JETP28, 1200–1205 (1969)

work page 1969
[39]

Black holes and the butterfly effect

S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Black holes and the butterfly effect”, J. High Energy Phys.2014, 1–25 (2014)

work page 2014
[40]

Stringy effects in scrambling

S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Stringy effects in scrambling”, J. High Energy Phys. 2015, 1–34 (2015)

work page 2015
[41]

A bound on chaos

J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “A bound on chaos”, J. High Energy Phys.2016, 1–17 (2016)

work page 2016
[42]

Out-of-time-order correlators and quantum chaos

I. García-Mata, R. A. Jalabert, and D. A. Wisniacki, “Out-of-time-order correlators and quantum chaos”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07965 (2022)

work page arXiv 2022
[43]

P . A. M. Dirac,The principles of quantum mechanics, 27 (Oxford university press, 1981)

work page 1981
[44]

Shankar,Principles of quantum mechanics(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012),ISBN: 978-1-4757-0576-8

R. Shankar,Principles of quantum mechanics(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012),ISBN: 978-1-4757-0576-8

work page 2012
[45]

Gallavotti,Statistical mechanics: a short treatise(Springer Science & Business Media, 1999)

G. Gallavotti,Statistical mechanics: a short treatise(Springer Science & Business Media, 1999)

work page 1999
[46]

Science of Chaos or Chaos in Science?

J. Bricmont, “Science of chaos or chaos in science?”, arXiv preprint chao-dyn/9603009 (1996)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[47]

Boltzmann’s approach to statistical mechanics

S. Goldstein, “Boltzmann’s approach to statistical mechanics”, arXiv preprint cond- mat/0105242 (2001)

work page arXiv 2001
[48]

Microscopic origins of macroscopic behavior

J. L. Lebowitz, “Microscopic origins of macroscopic behavior”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03470 (2021)

work page arXiv 2021
[49]

Probing Rényi entanglement entropy via randomized measurements

T . Brydges, A. Elben, P . Jurcevic, B. Vermersch, C. Maier, B. P . Lanyon, P . Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F . Roos, “Probing Rényi entanglement entropy via randomized measurements”, Science364, 260–263 (2019)

work page 2019
[50]

S. M. Ross,A first course in probability(Pearson Harlow, UK, 2020),ISBN: 9780138076719

work page 2020
[51]

Ergodic properties of eigenfunctions

A. I. Shnirelman, “Ergodic properties of eigenfunctions”, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk29, 181–182 (1974)

work page 1974
[52]

Ergodicité et fonctions propres du laplacien

Y. Colin de Verdière, “Ergodicité et fonctions propres du laplacien”, Commun. Math. Phys.102, 497–502 (1985). 42

work page 1985
[53]

Uniform distribution of eigenfunctions on compact hyperbolic surfaces

S. Zelditch, “Uniform distribution of eigenfunctions on compact hyperbolic surfaces”, Duke Mathematical Journal55, 919–941 (1987). [54]S. Zelditch, “Quantum mixing”, J. Funct. Anal.140, 68–86 (1996)

work page 1987
[54]

Quantum ergodicity

T . Sunada, “Quantum ergodicity”, inProgress in inverse spectral geometry(Springer, 1997), pp. 175–196

work page 1997
[55]

Quantum Ergodicity and Mixing

S. Zelditch, “Quantum ergodicity and mixing”, arXiv preprint math-ph/0503026 (2005)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[56]

Delocalization of Schrödinger eigenfunctions

N. Anantharaman, “Delocalization of Schrödinger eigenfunctions”, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians: Rio de Janeiro 2018 (World Scientific, 2018), pp. 341–375

work page 2018
[57]

Onset of random matrix behavior in scrambling systems

H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, S. H. Shenker, and M. Tezuka, “Onset of random matrix behavior in scrambling systems”, J. High Energy Phys.2018, 1–62 (2018)

work page 2018
[58]

Scrambling in double-scaled SYK and de Sitter space

L. Susskind, “Scrambling in double-scaled SYK and de Sitter space”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.00315 (2022)

work page arXiv 2022
[59]

Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems

P . Hayden and J. Preskill, “Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems”, J. High Energy Phys.2007, 120 (2007)

work page 2007
[60]

Efficient decoding for the Hayden-Preskill protocol

B. Yoshida and A. Kitaev, “Efficient decoding for the Hayden-Preskill protocol”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.03363 (2017)

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[61]

Chaos in quantum channels

P . Hosur, X.-L. Qi, D. A. Roberts, and B. Yoshida, “Chaos in quantum channels”, J. High Energy Phys.2016, 1–49 (2016)

work page 2016
[62]

Bidirec- tional teleportation using scrambling dynamics: a practical protocol

A. Vikram, E. Chaparro, M. M. Khan, A. Lucas, C. Akers, and A. M. Rey, “Bidirec- tional teleportation using scrambling dynamics: a practical protocol”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.15536 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[63]

Exact universal bounds on quantum dynamics and fast scrambling

A. Vikram and V . Galitski, “Exact universal bounds on quantum dynamics and fast scrambling”, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 040402 (2024)

work page 2024
[64]

Proof of a universal speed limit on fast scrambling in quantum systems

A. Vikram, L. Shou, and V . Galitski, “Proof of a universal speed limit on fast scrambling in quantum systems”, Phys. Rev. Lett. (to appear)

work page
[65]

Disentangling scrambling and decoherence via quantum teleportation

B. Yoshida and N. Y. Yao, “Disentangling scrambling and decoherence via quantum teleportation”, Phys. Rev. X9, 011006 (2019)

work page 2019
[66]

Chaos, complexity , and random matrices

J. Cotler, N. Hunter-Jones, J. Liu, and B. Yoshida, “Chaos, complexity , and random matrices”, J. High Energy Phys.2017, 1–60 (2017)

work page 2017
[67]

Measuring the scrambling of quantum information

B. Swingle, G. Bentsen, M. Schleier-Smith, and P . Hayden, “Measuring the scrambling of quantum information”, Phys. Rev. A94, 040302 (2016)

work page 2016
[68]

Measurement of many-body chaos using a quantum clock

G. Zhu, M. Hafezi, and T . Grover, “Measurement of many-body chaos using a quantum clock”, Phys. Rev. A94, 062329 (2016)

work page 2016
[69]

Probing Scrambling Using Statistical Correlations between Randomized Measurements

B. Vermersch, A. Elben, L. M. Sieberer, N. Y. Yao, and P . Zoller, “Probing Scrambling Using Statistical Correlations between Randomized Measurements”, Phys. Rev. X9, 21061,ISSN: 21603308 (2019)

work page 2019
[70]

Hamiltonian systems and transformation in Hilbert space

B. O. Koopman, “Hamiltonian systems and transformation in Hilbert space”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.17, 315–318 (1931)

work page 1931
[71]

Zur Operatorenmethode in der klassischen Mechanik

J. von Neumann, “Zur Operatorenmethode in der klassischen Mechanik”, Ann. Math. 33, 587–642 (1932). 43

work page 1932
[72]

Zusätze Zur Arbeit, Zur Operatorenmethode

J. von Neumann, “Zusätze Zur Arbeit, Zur Operatorenmethode...”, Ann. Math.33, 789–791 (1932)

work page 1932
[73]

Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis and out of time order correlators

L. Foini and J. Kurchan, “Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis and out of time order correlators”, Phys. Rev. E99, 042139 (2019)

work page 2019
[74]

Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis and free probability

S. Pappalardi, L. Foini, and J. Kurchan, “Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis and free probability”, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 170603 (2022)

work page 2022
[75]

Two subspaces

E. S. Meckes,The random matrix theory of the classical compact groups, Vol. 218, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 2019). [77]P . R. Halmos, “Two subspaces”, Trans. Am. Math. Soc.144, 381–389 (1969)

work page 2019
[76]

A gentle guide to the basics of two projections theory

A. Böttcher and I. M. Spitkovsky, “A gentle guide to the basics of two projections theory”, Linear Algebra Its Appl.432, 1412–1459 (2010)

work page 2010
[77]

Constructing an ergodic theory of quantum information dy- namics

Amit Vikram Anand, “Constructing an ergodic theory of quantum information dy- namics”, PhD thesis (University of Maryland, College Park, 2024). [80]M. L. Mehta,Random matrices(Elsevier, 2004),ISBN: 978-0-12-088409-4. [81]F . Haake,Quantum signatures of chaos(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001)

work page 2024
[78]

Integration with respect to the Haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group

B. Collins and P .´Sniady, “Integration with respect to the Haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group”, Commun. Math. Phys.264, 773–795 (2006). [83]G. Köstenberger, “Weingarten calculus”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00921 (2021)

work page arXiv 2006
[79]

Exact analytic toolbox for quantum dynamics with tunable noise strength

M. Okyay, O. Hart, R. Nandkishore, and A. J. Friedman, “Exact analytic toolbox for quantum dynamics with tunable noise strength”, Phys. Rev. A112, 022215 (2025)

work page 2025
[80]

Chaos and complexity by design

D. A. Roberts and B. Yoshida, “Chaos and complexity by design”, J. High Energy Phys.2017, 1–64 (2017)

work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.