arxiv: 2604.02782 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · nucl-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Spin effects in superfluidity, neutron matter and neutron stars

Armen Sedrakian, Peter B. Rau

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE nucl-th

keywords neutron starsnuclear energy density expansionsuperfluiditymultimessenger constraintsmagnetic fieldsvortex pinningpulsar glitchesquark matter

0 comments

The pith

A nuclear energy density expansion around saturation reveals how lesser-known terms shape neutron-star mass, radius, and moment of inertia.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how spin, magnetic fields, and nucleonic superfluidity appear inside compact stars through both microscopic and macroscopic effects. It employs a meta-modeling approach that expands the nuclear energy density around isospin-symmetric matter at saturation density to isolate the impact of higher-order terms on global stellar properties. Multimessenger observations of mass, radius, and moment of inertia are then used to bound those terms. Magnetic fields strong enough to modify stellar structure are rare, yet weaker fields already alter superfluid phases via vortex and flux-tube dynamics. The review closes by noting open questions on glitch origins, post-glitch relaxation, and possible quark-matter cores with their own color-superconducting vortices.

Core claim

Using an expansion of the nuclear energy density around the isospin-symmetric and saturation-density limits, various lesser-known terms in this expansion modify compact-star observables, while multimessenger data constrain the allowed ranges of mass, radius, and moment of inertia; magnetic fields affect superfluid phases at lower strengths than those needed to alter overall structure, and vortex pinning together with mutual friction govern rotational dynamics including glitches.

What carries the argument

Meta-modeling framework that expands the nuclear energy density around isospin-symmetric saturation, isolating the contributions of higher-order terms to stellar observables.

Load-bearing premise

The expansion of the nuclear energy density around isospin-symmetric matter and saturation density remains adequate at the much higher densities inside neutron-star cores.

What would settle it

A precisely measured neutron-star mass-radius pair that lies outside the band allowed by any choice of parameters within the meta-model expansion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02782 by Armen Sedrakian, Peter B. Rau.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: shows representative EoS of neutron star matter with nucleonic degrees of freedom only constructed from a covariant density functional where the parameters Qsat and Lsym are varied to illustrate their effect on the pressure of matter [37]. The corresponding solutions of the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We review selected aspects of the interior physics of compact stars, focusing on the microscopic and macroscopic manifestations of spin, magnetic fields, and nucleonic superfluidity and superconductivity. Spin statistics of fermions allows quantum degeneracy pressure to determine the stability and global properties of neutron stars, whose structure depends sensitively on the strong interactions among baryons in dense matter. Using a generic meta-modeling framework based on an expansion of the nuclear energy density around the isospin-symmetric and saturation-density limits, we highlight how various lesser-known terms in this expansion affect compact-star observables and review multimessenger constraints on mass, radius, and moment of inertia. The influence of magnetic fields on dense matter is examined, showing that substantial effects in their structure require extremely strong fields, whereas lower fields are sufficient to affect their superfluid phases. At the mesoscopic scale, the coexistence of superfluid and superconducting components features vortex and flux-tube lattices, with pinning and mutual friction processes playing central roles in neutron-star rotational dynamics. We discuss unresolved issues concerning vortex structure, flux-tube configurations, and the origin of pulsar glitches and post-glitch relaxation. We also briefly address the possible emergence of deconfined quark phases in compact-star cores, including their color-superconducting properties, as well as the associated vortex structures and magnetic-field responses in such phases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A straightforward review of spin, superfluidity, and magnetic effects in neutron stars that organizes existing literature but adds no new calculations or tests.

read the letter

Hey, this is a review paper that pulls together work on how spin statistics, superfluidity, and magnetic fields shape neutron-star structure and dynamics. It walks through a meta-model that expands the nuclear energy density around saturation density and isospin symmetry, then shows how some of the less-common terms feed into mass-radius relations, moment of inertia, and multimessenger bounds. The sections on vortex lattices, pinning, mutual friction, and glitch relaxation are the parts that feel most concrete, and the brief nod to color-superconducting quark phases is useful for context. Credit where due: the authors have clearly read the literature and laid out the open questions on vortex structure and post-glitch behavior without overclaiming. The central limitation is the meta-model itself. Neutron-star cores sit at 5–10 times saturation density, and a Taylor expansion around saturation can require many higher-order coefficients or break down once hyperons or phase transitions enter. The paper flags lesser-known terms and their effects on observables but does not show convergence checks or side-by-side comparisons with ab-initio calculations at those densities, so the practical reach of the highlighted terms stays unclear. No new derivations or data appear; it is explicitly a synthesis. This is the kind of piece that helps someone entering the field or updating lecture notes on compact-star interiors. It is not essential for someone already deep in the equations, but it is organized enough to deserve referee time as a review. I would send it out for peer review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews selected aspects of compact-star interior physics, with emphasis on spin statistics, magnetic fields, and nucleonic superfluidity/superconductivity. It employs a generic meta-modeling framework that expands the nuclear energy density around the isospin-symmetric and saturation-density limits to illustrate how lesser-known higher-order terms affect mass, radius, and moment-of-inertia observables, while summarizing multimessenger constraints. Additional sections address magnetic-field effects on superfluid phases, vortex/flux-tube lattices, pinning and mutual friction, pulsar glitches, post-glitch relaxation, and the possible emergence of color-superconducting quark phases in the core.

Significance. If the meta-modeling framework and its highlighted terms are shown to be robust, the review offers a coherent synthesis connecting nuclear-physics expansions to astrophysical observables and rotational dynamics. It could serve as a useful reference for interpreting future multimessenger data on neutron-star structure and timing, particularly by drawing attention to terms that are often omitted in standard equations of state.

major comments (1)

[Meta-modeling framework] The meta-modeling framework (described in the section introducing the energy-density expansion) assumes that a Taylor series around saturation density and symmetric matter remains adequate at the 5–10 times saturation densities reached in neutron-star cores. No explicit convergence test, radius-of-convergence estimate, or direct comparison against ab-initio calculations at those densities is provided, which is load-bearing for the claim that the lesser-known terms meaningfully affect compact-star observables.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the paper 'highlights how various lesser-known terms... affect compact-star observables' but does not clarify whether any new quantitative results are derived or whether the discussion is entirely a synthesis of existing literature.
[Quark phases] In the brief discussion of deconfined quark phases, the treatment of color-superconducting vortex structures would benefit from explicit cross-references to recent works on the magnetic response of the CFL phase.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive overall assessment. We address the single major comment below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the discussion of the meta-modeling framework.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Meta-modeling framework] The meta-modeling framework (described in the section introducing the energy-density expansion) assumes that a Taylor series around saturation density and symmetric matter remains adequate at the 5–10 times saturation densities reached in neutron-star cores. No explicit convergence test, radius-of-convergence estimate, or direct comparison against ab-initio calculations at those densities is provided, which is load-bearing for the claim that the lesser-known terms meaningfully affect compact-star observables.

Authors: We agree that the applicability of the Taylor expansion at supranuclear densities requires explicit qualification. The meta-modeling approach is used in the review primarily as an illustrative device to show how higher-order terms can influence observables, rather than as a first-principles calculation valid to arbitrary density. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph (new subsection 2.3) that (i) cites existing radius-of-convergence analyses performed with chiral effective field theory and quantum Monte Carlo methods, (ii) notes that the expansion remains quantitatively useful up to approximately 4–5 times saturation density for the mass-radius and moment-of-inertia observables under discussion, and (iii) acknowledges that at the highest core densities the framework should be supplemented by alternative approaches. These additions directly address the referee’s concern while preserving the review character of the paper. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no self-referential derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is a review that invokes a generic meta-modeling framework (expansion of nuclear energy density around saturation and isospin symmetry) drawn from external literature to discuss effects on observables. It reviews multimessenger constraints on mass, radius, and moment of inertia without introducing new fitted parameters, self-referential equations, or predictions that reduce to its own inputs by construction. No load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes are used to close the central claims; all steps remain externally anchored.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on standard nuclear-physics assumptions and a meta-modeling expansion whose coefficients are constrained by data or prior calculations.

free parameters (1)

coefficients in nuclear energy density expansion
The meta-modeling framework expands the energy density with multiple terms whose numerical coefficients are fitted or constrained by nuclear data and astrophysical observations.

axioms (2)

standard math Fermion spin statistics produce degeneracy pressure that stabilizes neutron stars
Pauli exclusion principle applied to neutrons and protons at high density.
domain assumption Nuclear interactions at supra-nuclear densities determine global star properties
Standard assumption in neutron-star structure calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5533 in / 1276 out tokens · 40747 ms · 2026-05-13T18:39:15.835967+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

151 extracted references · 151 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

G. E. Uhlenbeck and S. A. Goudsmit,Spinning electrons and the structure of spectra,Nature117 (1926) 264–265

work page 1926
[2]

Pauli,Ueber den zusammenhang des abschlusses der elektronengruppen im atom mit der komplexstruktur der spektren,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik31 (1925) 765–783

W. Pauli,Ueber den zusammenhang des abschlusses der elektronengruppen im atom mit der komplexstruktur der spektren,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik31 (1925) 765–783

work page 1925
[3]

Pauli,Zur quantenmechanik des magnetischen elektrons,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik43(1927) 601–623

W. Pauli,Zur quantenmechanik des magnetischen elektrons,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik43(1927) 601–623

work page 1927
[4]

P. A. M. Dirac,The quantum theory of the electron, 20 Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character117(1928) 610–624

work page 1928
[5]

J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash,The Physics of Neutron Stars,Science304(2004) 536–542, [astro-ph/0405262]

work page arXiv 2004
[6]

Sedrakian, J.-J

A. Sedrakian, J. J. Li and F. Weber,Heavy baryons in compact stars,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.131(2023) 104041, [2212.01086]

work page arXiv 2023
[7]

R. C. Tolman,Static solutions of einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid,Phys. Rev.55(1939) 364–373

work page 1939
[8]

J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff,On massive neutron cores,Phys. Rev.55(1939) 374–381

work page 1939
[9]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical physics, Part 1. Pergamon Press, New York, 1980

work page 1980
[10]

I. I. Shapiro,Fourth test of general relativity,Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 789–791

work page 1964
[11]

Shapiro delay measurement of a two solar mass neutron star

P. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S. Ransom, M. Roberts and J. Hessels,Shapiro Delay Measurement of A Two Solar Mass Neutron Star,Nature467(2010) 1081–1083, [1010.5788]. [12]NANOGravcollaboration, Z. Arzoumanian et al., The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: High-precision timing of 45 Millisecond Pulsars,Astrophys. J. Suppl. 235(2018) 37, [1801.01837]

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[12]

H. T. Cromartie et al.,Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar,Nature Astron.4(2019) 72–76, [1904.06759]

work page arXiv 2019
[13]

A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

J. Antoniadis, P. C. Freire, N. Wex, T. M. Tauris, R. S. Lynch et al.,A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary,Science340(2013) 6131, [1304.6875]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[14]

Fonseca et al., Astrophys

E. Fonseca et al.,Refined Mass and Geometric Measurements of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620, Astrophys. J. Lett.915(2021) L12, [2104.00880]

work page arXiv 2021
[15]

J. M. Bardeen, K. S. Thorne and D. W. Meltzer,A Catalogue of Methods for Studying the Normal Modes of Radial Pulsation of General-Relativistic Stellar Models,Astrophys. J.145(1966) 505. [17]LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaborationcollaboration, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams et al.,Properties of the bi...

work page 1966
[16]

B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley et al.,GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass∼ 3.4 M ⊙,Astrophys. J. Lett.892(2020) L3, [2001.01761]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer,Constraining neutron-star tidal love numbers with gravitational-wave detectors,Phys. Rev. D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology77(2008) 021502

work page 2008
[18]

Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars

T. Hinderer,Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars, Astrophys. J.677(2008) 1216–1220, [0711.2420]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[19]

T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov et al.,A N ICERView of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation,Astrophy. J. Lett.887 (2019) L21, [1912.05702]

work page arXiv 2019
[20]

M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann et al.,PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius fromN ICERData and Implications for the Properties of N eutron Star Matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.887(2019) L24, [1912.05705]

work page arXiv 2019
[21]

T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray et al.,A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy, Astrophy. J. Lett.918(2021) L27, [2105.06980]

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann et al.,The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data,Astrophy. J. Lett.918(2021) L28, [2105.06979]

work page arXiv 2021
[23]

Vinciguerra, T

S. Vinciguerra, T. H. J. Salmi, A. L. Watts, D. Choudhury, T. E. Riley, P. S. Ray et al.,An updated mass–radius analysis of the 2017–2018 nicer data set of psr j0030+0451,Astrophys. J.961(2024) 62

work page 2017
[24]

Kramer, I

M. Kramer, I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, N. Wex, A. T. Deller, W. A. Coles et al.,Strong-field gravity tests with the double pulsar,Phys. Rev. X11(2021) 041050

work page 2021
[25]

J. M. Lattimer and B. F. Schutz,Constraining the equation of state with moment of inertia measurements,Astrophys. J.629(2005) 979–984

work page 2005
[26]

Gandolfi, J

S. Gandolfi, J. Carlson and S. Reddy,The maximum mass and radius of neutron stars and the nuclear symmetry energy,Phys. Rev. C85(2012) 032801

work page 2012
[27]

Y. Yang, N. C. Camacho, M. Hippert and J. Noronha-Hostler,Symmetry-energy expansion with strange dense matter,Phys. Rev. C(2026) –, [2504.18764]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[28]

S. M. A. Imam, N. K. Patra, C. Mondal, T. Malik and B. K. Agrawal,Bayesian reconstruction of nuclear matter parameters from the equation of state of neutron star matter,Phys. Rev. C105(2022) 015806

work page 2022
[29]

Xie and B.-A

W.-J. Xie and B.-A. Li,Bayesian inference of the incompressibility, skewness and kurtosis of nuclear matter from empirical pressures in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.48 (2021) 025110, [2001.03669]

work page arXiv 2021
[30]

J.-J. Li, Y. Tian and A. Sedrakian,Bayesian inferences on covariant density functionals from multimessenger astrophysical data: Nucleonic models, Phys. Rev. C111(2025) 055804, [2502.20000]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Li and A

J.-J. Li and A. Sedrakian,Bayesian inferences on covariant density functionals from multimessenger astrophysical data: The impacts of likelihood functions of low density matter constraints,Phys. Rev. C112 (2025) 015802, [2505.00911]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Margueron and F

J. Margueron and F. Gulminelli,Effect of high-order empirical parameters on the nuclear equation of state, Phys. Rev. C99(2019) 025806, [1807.01729]

work page arXiv 2019
[33]

Marczenko, D

M. Marczenko, D. Blaschke, K. Redlich and C. Sasaki, Toward a unified equation of state for multi-messenger astronomy,Astron. Astrophys.643(2020) A82, [2004.09566]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

Koehn, H

H. Koehn, H. Rose, P. T. H. Pang, R. Somasundaram, B. T. Reed, I. Tews et al.,From existing and new nuclear and astrophysical constraints to stringent limits on the equation of state of neutron-rich dense matter,Phys. Rev. X15(2025) 021014

work page 2025
[35]

J. J. Li and A. Sedrakian,New Covariant Density Functionals of Nuclear Matter for Compact Star Simulations,Astrophys. J.957(2023) 41, [2308.14457]. [38]LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham et al.,GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 21 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object,Astr...

work page arXiv 2023
[36]

Bombaci,The Hyperon Puzzle in Neutron Stars, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle Physics (HYP2015, p

I. Bombaci,The Hyperon Puzzle in Neutron Stars, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle Physics (HYP2015, p. 101002, 2017.1601.05339. DOI

work page arXiv 2017
[37]

Oertel, M

M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn and S. Typel, Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars, Rev. Mod. Phys.89(2017) 015007, [1610.03361]

work page arXiv 2017
[38]

Prakash, M

M. Prakash, M. Prakash, J. M. Lattimer and C. J. Pethick,Rapid Cooling of Neutron Stars by Hyperons and Delta Isobars,Astrophys. J. Lett.390(1992) L77

work page 1992
[39]

Fortin, A

M. Fortin, A. R. Raduta, S. Avancini and C. Providˆ encia,Thermal evolution of relativistic hyperonic compact stars with calibrated equations of state,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 083004, [2102.07565]

work page arXiv 2021
[40]

A. R. Raduta, J. J. Li, A. Sedrakian and F. Weber, Cooling of hypernuclear compact stars: Hartree-Fock models and high-density pairing,MNRAS487(2019) 2639–2652, [1903.01295]

work page arXiv 2019
[41]

Providˆ encia, M

C. Providˆ encia, M. Fortin, H. Pais and A. Rabhi, Hyperonic stars and the symmetry energy,Front. Astron. Space Sci.6(2019) 13, [1811.00786]

work page arXiv 2019
[42]

M. G. Alford, S. Han and M. Prakash,Generic conditions for stable hybrid stars,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 083013, [1302.4732]

work page arXiv 2013
[43]

Christian, A

J.-E. Christian, A. Zacchi and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Classifications of twin star solutions for a constant speed of sound parameterized equation of state,Eur. Phys. J. A54(2018) 28, [1707.07524]

work page arXiv 2018
[44]

J. J. Li, A. Sedrakian and M. Alford,Confronting new NICER mass-radius measurements with phase transition in dense matter and twin compact stars, JCAP2025(2025) 002, [2409.05322]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Alford and A

M. Alford and A. Sedrakian,Compact Stars with Sequential QCD Phase Transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(2017) 161104, [1706.01592]

work page arXiv 2017
[46]

H. Tan, J. Noronha-Hostler and N. Yunes,Neutron star equation of state in light of gw190814,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 261104, [2006.16296]

work page arXiv 2020
[47]

Turolla, S

R. Turolla, S. Zane and A. L. Watts,Magnetars: the physics behind observations. A review,Rep. Prog. Phys.78(2015) 116901, [1507.02924]

work page arXiv 2015
[48]

Adhikari, M

P. Adhikari, M. Ammon, S. S. Avancini, A. Ayala, A. Bandyopadhyay, D. Blaschke et al.,Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.146(2026) 104199, [2412.18632]

work page arXiv 2026
[49]

ROTATING NEUTRON STAR MODELS WITH MAGNETIC FIELD

M. Bocquet, S. Bonazzola, E. Gourgoulhon and J. Novak,Rotating neutron star models with a magnetic field.,Astron. Astrophys.301(1995) 757, [gr-qc/9503044]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[50]

Broderick, M

A. Broderick, M. Prakash and J. M. Lattimer,The Equation of State of Neutron Star Matter in Strong Magnetic Fields,Astrophys. J.537(2000) 351–367, [astro-ph/0001537]

work page arXiv 2000
[51]

C. Y. Cardall, M. Prakash and J. M. Lattimer,Effects of Strong Magnetic Fields on Neutron Star Structure, Astrophys. J.554(2001) 322–339, [arXiv:astro-ph/0011148]

work page arXiv 2001
[52]

V. B. Thapa, M. Sinha, J. J. Li and A. Sedrakian, Massive∆-resonance admixed hypernuclear stars with antikaon condensations,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 063004, [2102.08787]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

Peterson, P

J. Peterson, P. Costa, R. Kumar, V. Dexheimer, R. Negreiros and C. Providencia,Temperature and strong magnetic field effects in dense matter,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 063011, [2304.02454]

work page arXiv 2023
[54]

E. R. Most, J. Peterson, L. Scurto, H. Pais and V. Dexheimer,Impact of Magnetic-field-driven Anisotropies on the Equation of State Probed in Neutron Star Mergers,Astrophys. J. Lett.989(2025) L29, [2506.21696]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

Lai,Matter in strong magnetic fields,Rev

D. Lai,Matter in strong magnetic fields,Rev. Mod. Phys.73(2001) 629, [astro-ph/0009333]

work page arXiv 2001
[56]

A. K. Harding and D. Lai,Physics of strongly magnetized neutron stars,Rep. Prog. Phys.69(2006) 2631–2708, [astro-ph/0606674]

work page arXiv 2006
[57]

Chatterjee, J

D. Chatterjee, J. Novak and M. Oertel,Structure of ultra-magnetised neutron stars,Eur. Phys. J. A57 (2021) 249, [2108.13733]

work page arXiv 2021
[58]

A. G. Pili, N. Bucciantini and L. Del Zanna, Axisymmetric equilibrium models for magnetized neutron stars in General Relativity under the Conformally Flat Condition,MNRAS439(Apr.,

work page
[59]

3541–3563, [1401.4308]

work page arXiv
[60]

M. Das, A. Sedrakian and B. Mukhopadhyay, Superconductivity in magnetars: Exploring type-I and type-II states in toroidal magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) L081307, [2503.14594]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

J. W. Clark,Magnetic susceptibility of neutron matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.23(1969) 1463–1466

work page 1969
[62]

Tews and A

I. Tews and A. Schwenk,Spin-polarized Neutron Matter, the Maximum Mass of Neutron Stars, and GW170817,Astrophys. J.892(2020) 14, [1908.02638]

work page arXiv 2020
[63]

Vida˜ na and I

I. Vida˜ na and I. Bombaci,Equation of state and magnetic susceptibility of spin polarized isospin asymmetric nuclear matter,Phys. Rev. C66(2002) 045801, [nucl-th/0203061]

work page arXiv 2002
[64]

Haensel and S

P. Haensel and S. Bonazzola,Ferromagnetism of dense matter and magnetic properties of neutron stars., Astron. Astrophys.314(1996) 1017–1023, [astro-ph/9605149]

work page arXiv 1996
[65]

Arras and D

P. Arras and D. Lai,Neutrino - nucleon interactions in magnetized neutron star matter: The Effects of parity violation,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 043001, [astro-ph/9811371]

work page arXiv 1999
[66]

Maruyama, A

T. Maruyama, A. B. Balantekin, M.-K. Cheoun, T. Kajino, M. Kusakabe and G. J. Mathews,A relativistic quantum approach to neutrino and antineutrino emission via the direct Urca process in strongly magnetized neutron-star matter,Phys. Lett. B 824(2022) 136813, [2103.01703]

work page arXiv 2022
[67]

Huang, M

X.-G. Huang, M. Huang, D. H. Rischke and A. Sedrakian,Anisotropic hydrodynamics, bulk viscosities, and r-modes of strange quark stars with strong magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 045015, [0910.3633]

work page arXiv 2010
[68]

A. Y. Potekhin, J. A. Pons and D. Page,Neutron stars - cooling and transport,Space Sci. Rev.191(2015) 239–291, [1507.06186]

work page arXiv 2015
[69]

I. A. Shovkovy and R. Ghosh,Review of heat and charge transport in strongly magnetized relativistic plasmas,2506.14956

work page arXiv
[70]

Neutron star envelopes and thermal radiation from the magnetic surface

J. Ventura and A. Potekhin,Neutron Star Envelopes and Thermal Radiation from the Magnetic Surface, in The Neutron Star - Black Hole Connection (C. Kouveliotou, J. Ventura and E. van den Heuvel, 22 eds.), vol. 567, p. 393, 2001.astro-ph/0104003. DOI

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[71]

Chamel, Z

N. Chamel, Z. K. Stoyanov, L. M. Mihailov, Y. D. Mutafchieva, R. L. Pavlov and C. J. Velchev,Role of Landau quantization on the neutron-drip transition in magnetar crusts,Phys. Rev. C91(2015) 065801

work page 2015
[72]

R. D. Blandford and L. Hernquist,Magnetic susceptibility of a neutron star crust,J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.15(1982) 6233–6243

work page 1982
[73]

Suh and G

I.-S. Suh and G. J. Mathews,Magnetic domains in magnetar matter as an engine for soft gamma-ray repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars,Astrophys. J. 717(2010) 843–848

work page 2010
[74]

P. B. Rau and I. Wasserman,Magnetohydrodynamic stability of magnetars in the ultrastrong field regime II: The crust,MNRAS520(2023) 1173–1192

work page 2023
[75]

P. B. Rau and I. Wasserman,Numerical Simulation of Electron Magnetohydrodynamics with Landau-quantized Electrons in Magnetar Crusts, Astrophys. J.979(2025) 154, [2411.07948]

work page arXiv 2025
[76]

Sedrakian and J

A. Sedrakian and J. W. Clark,Superfluidity in nuclear systems and neutron stars,Eur. Phys. J. A55(2019) 167, [1802.00017]

work page arXiv 2019
[77]

M. V. Zverev, J. W. Clark and V. A. Khodel, 3P2-3F2 pairing in dense neutron matter: the spectrum of solutions,Nucl. Phys. A720(2003) 20–42, [nucl-th/0301028]

work page arXiv 2003
[78]

W. Zuo, C. X. Cui, U. Lombardo and H.-J. Schulze, Three-body force effect on P3 F 2 neutron superfluidity in neutron matter, neutron star matter, and neutron stars,Phys. Rev. C78(2008) 015805

work page 2008
[79]

J. M. Dong, U. Lombardo and W. Zuo, 3PF2 pairing in high-density neutron matter,Phys. Rev. C87 (2013) 062801, [1304.0117]

work page arXiv 2013
[80]

D. Ding, A. Rios, H. Dussan, W. H. Dickhoff, S. J. Witte, A. Carbone et al.,Pairing in high-density neutron matter including short- and long-range correlations,Phys. Rev. C94(2016) 025802, [1601.01600]

work page arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.