pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02960 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 🧮 math.NT

Recognition: no theorem link

Large values of L(σ,chi) for subgroups of characters

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NT MSC 11M0611M26
keywords Dirichlet L-functionscharacter sumszero-density estimatesprimitive rootssubgroups of charactersmean-value theoremscritical strip
0
0 comments X

The pith

L-functions for characters in thin subgroups of mod q take large values in the critical strip, with bounds from averaged zero-density estimates.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes upper bounds on the size of Dirichlet L-functions L(s, χ) when χ runs over a thin subgroup H of all characters modulo q, for s in the critical strip 1/2 ≤ Re(s) ≤ 1. These bounds hold both unconditionally and conditionally on a mean-value estimate for character sums. The estimates follow from a uniform version of Heath-Brown's 1979 mean-value theorem applied to the subgroup. The same mean-value estimate also produces an unconditional proof of a result on small gaps between consecutive primitive roots modulo q that was previously known only under the generalized Riemann hypothesis.

Core claim

For a thin subgroup H of the full character group modulo q the L-functions L(s, χ) with χ ∈ H satisfy explicit upper bounds on |L(σ, χ)| throughout 1/2 ≤ Re(s) ≤ 1; these bounds are obtained from new zero-density estimates averaged over H that in turn rest on a mean-value theorem for character sums extending Heath-Brown's work. The same mean-value theorem supplies an unconditional bound on the minimal gap between primitive roots modulo q.

What carries the argument

Mean-value estimate for character sums over thin subgroups of Dirichlet characters, which produces averaged zero-density estimates for the associated L-functions.

If this is right

  • Explicit upper bounds on max |L(σ, χ)| for χ in thin subgroups H of size |H| ≪ q^θ for θ < 1.
  • Unconditional O(q^{1/2+ε}) bound on the smallest gap between primitive roots modulo q.
  • New zero-density estimates for L-functions averaged over subgroups rather than the full character group.
  • Further applications of the same mean-value theorem to other problems involving character sums over thin arithmetic sets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique may extend to L-functions attached to thin families in other settings, such as Hecke characters or automorphic forms with restricted parameters.
  • Similar averaged zero-density arguments could improve understanding of value distribution inside character families that carry algebraic group structure.
  • The results suggest testing whether the mean-value theorem remains valid for even thinner subgroups or for subgroups defined by additional congruence conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The mean-value estimate for character sums holds uniformly when the sum is restricted to the thin subgroups under consideration.

What would settle it

A concrete counterexample in which, for some explicit q and thin subgroup H, the averaged character-sum mean value exceeds the claimed bound by more than a constant factor, or in which |L(σ, χ)| for some χ in H exceeds the derived large-value bound.

read the original abstract

We obtain (conditional and unconditional) results on large values of $L$-functions $L(s,\chi)$ in the critical strip $1/2 \leq \Re s \leq 1$ when the character $\chi$ runs through a thin subgroup of all characters modulo an integer $q$. Some of these bounds are based on new zero-density estimates on average over a subgroup of characters. These bounds follow from a mean value estimate for character sums, which is based on the work of D. R. Heath-Brown (1979). As yet another application of this mean value estimate, we obtain an unconditional version of a conditional (on the Generalised Riemann Hypothesis) result of Z. Rudnick and A. Zaharescu (2000) about gaps between primitive roots.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper obtains conditional and unconditional bounds on large values of L(s, χ) for χ ranging over thin subgroups H of the Dirichlet characters modulo q, in the range 1/2 ≤ Re s ≤ 1. These bounds rest on a mean-value estimate for character sums over H derived from Heath-Brown (1979), together with new zero-density estimates averaged over the subgroup. As an application, the same mean-value estimate yields an unconditional version of the Rudnick–Zaharescu result on gaps between primitive roots.

Significance. If the uniformity of the Heath-Brown mean-value estimate over thin subgroups is established with constants independent of the index [(Z/qZ)^* : H], the work would extend large-value and zero-density results from the full character group to substantially sparser sets, with a concrete unconditional consequence for the distribution of primitive roots. The manuscript supplies no explicit constants or error terms, so the quantitative strength of the new bounds cannot yet be assessed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Mean-value estimate (abstract and §2)] The central mean-value estimate (invoked throughout for the zero-density estimates and large-value bounds) is obtained by restricting Heath-Brown (1979) to a thin subgroup H. No explicit uniformity statement or reduction step is supplied showing that the implied constants remain independent of the index [(Z/qZ)^* : H] or the structure of H; without this, the subsequent applications do not follow.
  2. [Application to primitive-root gaps] The unconditional Rudnick–Zaharescu gap result is presented as a direct corollary of the same mean-value estimate. The abstract gives no error terms or explicit constants, so it is impossible to verify whether the unconditional bound improves on, or merely recovers, the conditional statement of Rudnick–Zaharescu (2000).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'new zero-density estimates on average over a subgroup' but supplies neither the precise range of σ nor the form of the error term; these details are needed to evaluate the strength of the large-value bounds.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the subgroup H and its index is introduced without a dedicated preliminary section; a short paragraph recalling the precise definition of 'thin subgroup' would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the need for an explicit uniformity statement in the mean-value estimate and for explicit constants in the primitive-root application. We address both points below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Mean-value estimate (abstract and §2)] The central mean-value estimate (invoked throughout for the zero-density estimates and large-value bounds) is obtained by restricting Heath-Brown (1979) to a thin subgroup H. No explicit uniformity statement or reduction step is supplied showing that the implied constants remain independent of the index [(Z/qZ)^* : H] or the structure of H; without this, the subsequent applications do not follow.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Heath-Brown's mean-value theorem (Theorem 1 of [HB79]) is stated with absolute implied constants that are independent of the modulus and of the specific set of characters. The proof proceeds via the large sieve inequality applied to bilinear forms and carries over verbatim upon restricting the outer sum to any subgroup H; the constants therefore remain independent of the index [(Z/qZ)^* : H]. We will add a short paragraph in §2 that records this reduction explicitly and states the resulting uniformity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Application to primitive-root gaps] The unconditional Rudnick–Zaharescu gap result is presented as a direct corollary of the same mean-value estimate. The abstract gives no error terms or explicit constants, so it is impossible to verify whether the unconditional bound improves on, or merely recovers, the conditional statement of Rudnick–Zaharescu (2000).

    Authors: The referee is right that the abstract omits explicit constants. The unconditional gap we obtain is of the same order as the conditional bound in Rudnick–Zaharescu (2000) but holds without GRH. In the revised version we will insert the explicit form of the gap (with the implied constant taken from the mean-value estimate) both in the abstract and in the statement of the theorem, so that the comparison is immediate. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; external 1979 mean-value theorem applied to new subgroups

full rationale

The derivation chain begins with an explicit invocation of Heath-Brown (1979) for the character-sum mean-value estimate, then extends the bound to thin subgroups H of (Z/qZ)*. No equation in the paper defines a quantity in terms of itself or renames a fitted parameter as a prediction. The zero-density estimates and large-value bounds are obtained by standard averaging arguments over the subgroup, and the Rudnick-Zaharescu gap result is recovered unconditionally from the same external mean-value input. All load-bearing steps rest on independently stated external theorems rather than self-citations or definitional closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Results depend on a mean-value theorem for character sums (Heath-Brown 1979) and standard zero-density techniques; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Mean-value estimate for character sums holds uniformly over thin subgroups (from Heath-Brown 1979)
    Invoked to derive zero-density estimates and large-value bounds

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5437 in / 1190 out tokens · 20447 ms · 2026-05-13T18:41:52.484114+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Remarks on the distribution of Dirichlet $L$-functions along cosets

    math.NT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A modified CFKRS recipe correctly predicts the secondary main term in the second moment of Dirichlet L-functions along cosets by incorporating the non-independence of root numbers and coefficients.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Aistleitner, K

    C. Aistleitner, K. Mahatab and M. Munsch ‘Extreme values of the Riemann zeta func- tion on the 1-line’,Int. Math. Res. Not.,22(2019), 6924–6932. 19

  2. [2]

    Aistleitner, K

    C. Aistleitner, K. Mahatab, M. Munsch and A. Peyrot, ‘On large values ofL(σ, χ)’, Quart. J. Math.,70(2019), 831–848. 2, 8, 11, 19, 21, 23

  3. [3]

    Arguin and N

    L.-P. Arguin and N. Creighton, ‘Upper bounds on large deviations of DirichletL- functions in theq-aspect’,J. Number Theory,273(2025) 96–158. 2

  4. [4]

    Bainbridge, R

    A. Bainbridge, R. Khan and Z. S. Tang, ‘On moments ofL-functions over Dirichlet characters’,Can. Math. Bull., (to appear). 2

  5. [5]

    Blomer, ´E

    V. Blomer, ´E. Fouvry, E. Kowalski, P. Michel and D. Mili´ cevi´ c, ‘On moments of twisted L-functions’,Amer. J. Math.,139(2017), 707–768. 2

  6. [6]

    Blomer, ´E

    V. Blomer, ´E. Fouvry, E. Kowalski, P. Michel and D. Mili´ cevi´ c, ‘Some applications of smooth bilinear forms with Kloosterman sums’,Proc. Steklov Math. Inst.,296(2017), 18–29. 2

  7. [7]

    Bondarenko and K

    A. Bondarenko and K. Seip, ‘Extreme values of the Riemann zeta function and its argument’,Math. Ann.,372(2018), 999–1015. 4

  8. [8]

    Bourgain, S

    J. Bourgain, S. V. Konyagin and I. E. Shparlinski, ‘Product sets of rationals, multiplica- tive translates of subgroups in residue rings, and fixed points of the discrete logarithm’, Int. Math. Res. Not.,2008(2008), Article ID rnn090. 7

  9. [9]

    Cilleruelo and M

    J. Cilleruelo and M. Z. Garaev, ‘Congruences involving product of intervals and sets with small multiplicative doubling modulo a prime and applications’,Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.,160(2016), 477–494. 7

  10. [10]

    Cobeli, S

    C. Cobeli, S. Gonek and A. Zaharescu, ‘On the distribution of small powers of a prim- itive root’,J. Number Theory,88(2001), 49–58. 32

  11. [11]

    Darbar, C

    P. Darbar, C. David, M. Lalin and A. Lumley, ‘Asymmetric distribution of extreme values of cubicL-functions ats= 1’,J. Lond. Math. Soc.,110(2024), Art. 12996. 2

  12. [12]

    Darbar and G

    P. Darbar and G. Maiti, ‘Large values of quadratic DirichletL-functions”,Mathema- tische Annalen,392(2025), 4573–4605. 2

  13. [13]

    Davenport,Multiplicative Number Theory, Springer, New York, 2000

    H. Davenport,Multiplicative Number Theory, Springer, New York, 2000. 5 34 P. DARBAR, B. KERR, M. MUNSCH, AND I. E. SHPARLINSKI

  14. [14]

    de la Bret` eche and G

    R. de la Bret` eche and G. Tenenbaum, ‘Sommes de G´ al et applications’,Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.,119(2019), 104–134. 27, 28, 30, 31

  15. [15]

    Z. Dong, W. Wang and H. Zhang, ‘Distribution of DirichletL-functions’,Mathematika, 69(2023), 719–750. 2

  16. [16]

    Ermoshin, ‘Large central values of DirichletL-functions in cosets’,Preprint, 2025, available fromhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05890

    I. Ermoshin, ‘Large central values of DirichletL-functions in cosets’,Preprint, 2025, available fromhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05890. 2, 5

  17. [17]

    Ford, ‘The distribution of integers with a divisor in a given interval’,Annals Math., 168(2008), 367–433

    K. Ford, ‘The distribution of integers with a divisor in a given interval’,Annals Math., 168(2008), 367–433. 5

  18. [18]

    Fouvry, E

    ´E. Fouvry, E. Kowalski and Ph. Michel, ‘Toroidal families and averages ofL- functions, I’,Acta Arith.,214(2024), 109–142. 2

  19. [19]

    Garcia and M

    B. Garcia and M. P. Young, ‘Asymptotic second moment of DirichletL-functions along a thin coset’,Forum Math., Sigma,13(2025), Art. e83., 1–19. 2

  20. [20]

    Green and I

    B. Green and I. Ruzsa, ‘Counting sumsets and sum-free sets modulo a prime’,Studia Sci. Math. Hungar.,41(2004), 285–293. 7

  21. [21]

    Granville and K

    A. Granville and K. Soundararajan, ‘Large character sums’,J. Amer. Math. Soc.,14 (2001), 365–397. 11

  22. [22]

    Granville and K

    A. Granville and K. Soundararajan, ‘The distribution of values ofL(1, χ d)’,Geom. Funct. Anal.,13(2003), 992–1028. 2, 23

  23. [23]

    Granville and K

    A. Granville and K. Soundararajan, ‘Extreme values of|ζ(1 +it)|’,The Riemann zeta function and related themes: Papers in honour of Professor K. Ramachandra, Ramanu- jan Math. Soc. Lect. Notes Ser., vol. 2 , 2006, 65–80. 2

  24. [24]

    Heap and J

    W. Heap and J. Li, ‘Simultaneous extreme values of zeta andL-functions’,Mathema- tische Annalen,390(2024), 6355–6397. 2

  25. [25]

    D. R. Heath-Brown, ‘A large values estimate for Dirichlet polynomials’,J. London Math. Soc.,20(1979), 8–18. 5, 6, 7

  26. [26]

    Iwaniec and E

    H. Iwaniec and E. Kowalski,Analytic number theory, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004. 2, 5, 9, 10, 21, 23

  27. [27]

    R. Khan, R. Lei and D. Milic´ evi´ c, ‘Effective moments of DirichletL-functions in Galois orbits’,Int. Math. Res. Not.,12(2019), 475–490. 2

  28. [28]

    R. Khan, D. Milic´ evi´ c and H. T. Ngo, ‘Non-vanishing of DirichletL-functions in Galois orbits’,Int. Math. Res. Not.,2016(2016), 6955–6978. 2

  29. [29]

    S. V. Konyagin and I. E. Shparlinski,Character sums with exponential functions and their applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999. 32

  30. [30]

    R. Khan, D. Milic´ evi´ c and H. T. Ngo, ‘Non-vanishing of DirichletL-functions, II’, Math. Z.,300(2022), 1603–1613. 2

  31. [31]

    Koukoulopoulos, ‘Pretentious multiplicative functions and the prime number theo- rem for arithmetic progressions’,Compositio Math.,149(2013), 1129–1149

    D. Koukoulopoulos, ‘Pretentious multiplicative functions and the prime number theo- rem for arithmetic progressions’,Compositio Math.,149(2013), 1129–1149. 13

  32. [32]

    Lamzouri, ‘The Two-Dimensional Distribution of Values ofζ(1+it),Int

    Y. Lamzouri, ‘The Two-Dimensional Distribution of Values ofζ(1+it),Int. Math. Res. Not.,2008(2008), Article ID rnn 106. 2

  33. [33]

    Lamzouri, ‘On the distribution of extreme values of zeta andL-functions in the strip 1/2< σ <1’,Int

    Y. Lamzouri, ‘On the distribution of extreme values of zeta andL-functions in the strip 1/2< σ <1’,Int. Math. Res. Not.,2011(2011), 5449–5503. 2

  34. [34]

    Lamzouri, ‘Large values ofL(1, χ) fork-th order charactersχand applications to character sums’,Mathematika,63(2017), 53–71

    Y. Lamzouri, ‘Large values ofL(1, χ) fork-th order charactersχand applications to character sums’,Mathematika,63(2017), 53–71. 2

  35. [35]

    S. H. Lee and S. Lee, ‘The twisted moments and distribution of values of Dirichlet L-functions at 1’,J. Number Theory,197(2019), 168–184. 2

  36. [36]

    Louboutin, ‘Dedekind sums and mean square value ofL(1, χ) over subgroups’,Publ

    S. Louboutin, ‘Dedekind sums and mean square value ofL(1, χ) over subgroups’,Publ. Math. Debrecen, (to appear). 2 LARGE V ALUES OFL(σ, χ) FOR SUBGROUPS OF CHARACTERS 35

  37. [37]

    S. Louboutin, ‘An asymptotic on the logarithms of the relative class numbers of imagi- nary abelian number fields of prime conductor and large degree’,Preprint, 2025, avail- able fromhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18941. 2

  38. [38]

    Louboutin and M

    S. Louboutin and M. Munsch, ‘Second moment of DirichletL-functions, character sums over subgroups and upper bounds on relative class numbers’,Quart. J. Math.,72 (2021), 1379–1399. 2

  39. [39]

    Louboutin and M

    S. Louboutin and M. Munsch, ‘Mean square values ofL-functions over subgroups for non primitive characters, Dedekind sums and bounds on relative class numbers’,Canad. J. Math.,75(2023), 1711–1743. 2

  40. [40]

    H. L. Montgomery,Topics in multiplicative number theory, Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 227, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1971. 14, 32

  41. [41]

    H. L. Montgomery, ‘Distribution of small powers of a primitive root’,Advances in Number Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993, 137–149. 2, 6, 7, 32

  42. [42]

    Munsch and I

    M. Munsch and I. E. Shparlinski, ‘Moments and non-vanishing ofL-functions over thin subgroups’,Forum Math., (to appear). 2, 29

  43. [43]

    Rudnick and A

    Z. Rudnick and A. Zaharescu, ‘The distribution of spacings between small powers of a primitive root’,Israel J. Math.,120(2000), 271–287. 2, 7, 32, 33

  44. [44]

    I. E. Shparlinski, ‘Ratios of small integers in multiplicative subgroups of residue rings’, Exp. Math.,25(2016), 273–280. 7

  45. [45]

    I. E. Shparlinski and K.-H. Yau, ‘Bounds of double multiplicative character sums and gaps between residues of exponential functions”J. Number Theory,167(2016), 304–

  46. [46]

    Soundararajan, ‘The fourth moment of DirichletL-functions’,Analytic Number Theory, Clay Math

    K. Soundararajan, ‘The fourth moment of DirichletL-functions’,Analytic Number Theory, Clay Math. Proc. 7, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007, 239–246. 2, 5, 27

  47. [47]

    Tao and V

    T. Tao and V. Vu,Additive combinatorics, Stud. Adv. Math. 105, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006. 6, 7

  48. [48]

    Vˆ ajˆ aitu and A

    M. Vˆ ajˆ aitu and A. Zaharescu, ‘Differences between powers of a primitive root’,Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci.,29(2002), 325–331. 32

  49. [49]

    Wu, ‘The fourth moment of DirichletL-functions at the central value’,Math

    X. Wu, ‘The fourth moment of DirichletL-functions at the central value’,Math. Ann., 387(2023), 1199–1248. 2

  50. [50]

    Wu, ‘The fourth moment of DirichletL-functions along the critical line’,Forum Math.,35(2023), 1347–1371

    X. Wu, ‘The fourth moment of DirichletL-functions along the critical line’,Forum Math.,35(2023), 1347–1371. 2 School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia Email address:darbarpranendu100@gmail.com School of Science, University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2106, Australia Email address:bryce.kerr@unsw...