pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.03702 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.acc-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Analytical evaluation of surface barrier and resistance in iron-based superconducting multilayers for Superconducting Radio-Frequency applications

Carlos Redondo Herrero , Akira Miyazaki
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 17:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.acc-ph
keywords iron-based superconductorsmultilayerssuperconducting radio-frequencysurface barriersurface resistancepower lossniobium cavitiesparticle accelerators
0
0 comments X

The pith

Iron-based superconducting multilayers achieve higher magnetic field limits and lower surface resistance than conventional materials for radio-frequency cavities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analytically assesses iron-based superconducting multilayers for use in superconducting radio-frequency resonators. It compares their maximum magnetic field, surface resistance, and power loss per unit area to those of conventional superconductor multilayers and bulk niobium. The evaluation supports the potential for improved performance at higher operating temperatures. A reader would care because these changes could reduce cryogenic cooling demands and energy costs in particle accelerators.

Core claim

The paper claims that iron-based superconducting multilayers exhibit advantageous surface barrier properties and resistance characteristics that enable higher field operation and reduced power losses compared to traditional materials, facilitating increased operating temperatures in SRF cavities.

What carries the argument

Analytical models for calculating surface barrier, surface resistance, and power loss in iron-based superconductor multilayer geometries.

If this is right

  • The multilayers support higher peak magnetic fields before magnetic flux penetration occurs.
  • Surface resistance is reduced, resulting in lower energy dissipation during RF operation.
  • Power loss per unit surface area decreases compared to bulk niobium under equivalent conditions.
  • Accelerators using these structures can operate at temperatures higher than those feasible with conventional niobium cavities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar multilayer designs could be adapted for other layered superconductors to further optimize SRF performance.
  • Validation would require experimental RF testing of actual fabricated samples at relevant frequencies and temperatures.
  • Success might enable more compact accelerator designs by relaxing cryogenic requirements.
  • The approach could extend to applications in particle detectors where high fields and low losses are also beneficial.

Load-bearing premise

The analytical models and material parameters calibrated for conventional superconductors apply directly to iron-based superconductors in multilayer structures without major adjustments for their distinct properties.

What would settle it

RF measurements on a fabricated iron-based superconductor multilayer sample that yield surface resistance or field limits inconsistent with the analytical predictions would disprove the performance gains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03702 by Akira Miyazaki, Carlos Redondo Herrero.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Multilayer structure, where the superconductor thin-film is denoted as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Normalized value of the Electric and Magnetic fields inside the multilayered distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Results for the NbN/I/Nb multilayer structure. Figure (a): maximum applicable field of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results for the Nb3Sn/I/Nb multilayer structure. Figure (a): maximum applicable field of the multilayer. Figure (b): Surface resistance of the multilayer. (Color online) In this case, the maximum field is achieved when the superconducting layer thickness is dS = 110 nm and the insulating layer thickness is dI = 10 nm. This corresponds to a maximum field of Bv = 480.8 mT and a multilayer surface resistance … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Results for the FeSe/I/Nb multilayer structure. Figure (a): maximum applicable field of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Results for the FeSe/I/Nb3Sn multilayer structure. Figure (a): maximum applicable field of the multilayer. Figure (b): Surface resistance of the multilayer. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Attenuation factors D1(dI , dS) and D2(dI , dS) in the FeSe/I/Nb3Sn multilayer. 4.2 Comparison of various multilayers We compare the optimal layer parameters, along with the corresponding Bv and Rs, for these multilayers and bulk Nb in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

New superconducting materials, particularly iron-based superconductors (IBS), have recently attracted attention for their potential applications in particle detectors and accelerators. This paper discusses the application of these materials in multilayer structures for radio-frequency resonators used to accelerate charged particles, with the aim of improving performance compared to bulk niobium. These materials are compared with previously studied multilayers composed of conventional superconductors in terms of the maximum magnetic field they can withstand, their surface resistance, and their power loss per unit surface area. Finally, perspectives and future applications aimed at increasing operating temperatures are discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analytically evaluates the surface barrier, surface resistance, and power loss per unit area for iron-based superconductor (IBS) multilayers intended for SRF cavities. It compares these quantities to conventional superconductor multilayers and bulk niobium using expressions derived from London and Ginzburg-Landau theory, concluding that IBS-based structures can sustain higher maximum magnetic fields with lower losses and offering perspectives for elevated operating temperatures.

Significance. If the analytical transfer from conventional s-wave models proves valid, the work supplies a compact framework for screening IBS multilayer designs against Nb performance limits, potentially guiding cavity R&D toward higher gradients and reduced cryogenic costs in accelerators.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1–2.3] §2.1–2.3 (Model Derivations): The surface-barrier field H_b and Rs expressions are taken directly from isotropic London/GL forms calibrated on s-wave materials. No re-derivation or correction appears for the s± sign-changing gap or strong in-plane anisotropy of IBS, which modify the quasiparticle DOS and vortex-core structure; this assumption is load-bearing for all quantitative comparisons in §4 and §5.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Parameter Table): IBS values for λ, ξ, and Δ are inserted without multilayer-specific renormalization or RF-frequency dependence; the resulting H_b and power-loss ratios therefore rest on untested transferability rather than independent calibration against IBS thin-film data.
  3. [§5] §5 (Comparative Plots): The claimed superiority of IBS multilayers over Nb and conventional multilayers is shown only for the adopted parameter set; a sensitivity analysis to ±20 % variations in anisotropy or gap ratio is absent, leaving the robustness of the ranking unclear.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 caption: the legend labels “IBS-1” and “IBS-2” are not defined in the text; add a brief definition or reference to the parameter table.
  2. [Eq. (7)] Eq. (7): the symbol for the multilayer thickness ratio is introduced without prior definition; insert a sentence in §2.2 clarifying its meaning.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2.1–2.3] §2.1–2.3 (Model Derivations): The surface-barrier field H_b and Rs expressions are taken directly from isotropic London/GL forms calibrated on s-wave materials. No re-derivation or correction appears for the s± sign-changing gap or strong in-plane anisotropy of IBS, which modify the quasiparticle DOS and vortex-core structure; this assumption is load-bearing for all quantitative comparisons in §4 and §5.

    Authors: We agree that the expressions follow the standard isotropic London and GL forms without explicit re-derivation for the s± gap symmetry or in-plane anisotropy characteristic of IBS. These approximations are used to obtain compact analytical estimates suitable for initial design screening. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in §2 discussing the limitations of the isotropic treatment, the possible effects of anisotropy and sign-changing order parameter on the quasiparticle spectrum, and the fact that a full microscopic calculation lies beyond the present scope. The quantitative comparisons will be presented with this caveat. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Parameter Table): IBS values for λ, ξ, and Δ are inserted without multilayer-specific renormalization or RF-frequency dependence; the resulting H_b and power-loss ratios therefore rest on untested transferability rather than independent calibration against IBS thin-film data.

    Authors: The tabulated values are taken directly from published bulk IBS literature. We acknowledge that multilayer geometry and RF-frequency dependence may require renormalization, but such corrections would demand additional microscopic modeling or experimental thin-film data that are not yet available. In the revision we will expand §3.2 with a clear statement of the parameter sources, the assumptions of transferability, and the associated uncertainties. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§5] §5 (Comparative Plots): The claimed superiority of IBS multilayers over Nb and conventional multilayers is shown only for the adopted parameter set; a sensitivity analysis to ±20 % variations in anisotropy or gap ratio is absent, leaving the robustness of the ranking unclear.

    Authors: We will add a sensitivity analysis to §5 (or a new appendix) that varies the anisotropy parameter and gap ratio by ±20 % around the nominal values and recomputes the H_b and power-loss ratios. This will quantify the robustness of the ranking between IBS multilayers, conventional multilayers, and bulk Nb. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations rely on independent standard models

full rationale

The paper applies established analytical expressions for surface barrier, Rs, and power loss (drawn from London/Ginzburg-Landau theory) to IBS multilayers and compares them with conventional cases and bulk Nb. No quoted equations or sections show a parameter fitted to the target IBS data then renamed as a prediction, nor a self-citation chain that supplies the load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz. The central comparisons rest on the transferability assumption for material parameters, which is a correctness question rather than a definitional or fitted-input reduction. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted from the manuscript.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5397 in / 999 out tokens · 33850 ms · 2026-05-13T17:10:41.577481+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Detection of high-frequency gravitational waves using SRF cavities

    M. Wenskat et al. “Detection of high-frequency gravitational waves using SRF cavities”. In: 22nd International Conference on RF Superconductivity. Jan. 2026. arXiv:2601.18719 [physics.acc-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Qudit-based quantum computing with SRF cavities at Fermilab

    Tanay Roy et al. “Qudit-based quantum computing with SRF cavities at Fermilab”. In:PoS LATTICE2023 (2024), p. 127.doi:10.22323/1.453.0127

    work page doi:10.22323/1.453.0127 2024

  3. [3]

    Romanenko et al.New Exclusion Limit for Dark Photons from an SRF Cavity-Based Search (Dark SRF)

    A. Romanenko et al.New Exclusion Limit for Dark Photons from an SRF Cavity-Based Search (Dark SRF). 2023. arXiv:2301.11512 [hep-ex].url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.11512

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Bianca Giaccone et al.Design of axion and axion dark matter searches based on ultra high Q SRF cavities. 2022. arXiv:2207.11346 [hep-ex].url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.11346. 11 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al Parameter Value ω 1.3 GHz T 2 K λF eSe 200 nm λNbN 200 nm λNb 40 nm λNb3Sn 90 nm ∆F eSe(T= 2K) 2.2 meV ∆NbN(T= 2K) 2.6 meV ∆Nb(T=...

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Next-Generation Superconducting RF Technology based on Advanced Thin Film Technologies and Innovative Materials for Accelerator Enhanced Performance and Energy Reach

    A. -. M. Valente-Feliciano et al. “Next-Generation Superconducting RF Technology based on Advanced Thin Film Technologies and Innovative Materials for Accelerator Enhanced Performance and Energy Reach”. In: (Apr. 2022). arXiv:2204.02536 [physics.acc-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    High-field Q-slope mitigation due to impurity profile in superconducting radio-frequency cavities

    M. Checchin and A. Grassellino. “High-field Q-slope mitigation due to impurity profile in superconducting radio-frequency cavities”. In:Applied Physics Letters117.3 (July 2020), p. 032601.issn: 0003-6951.doi:10.1063/5.0013698. eprint: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0013698/14536439/032601_1_online.pdf.url: https://doi.org/10.1063/...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0013698 2020

  7. [7]

    Anti-Q-slope enhancement in high-frequency niobium cavities

    Martina Martinello et al. “Anti-Q-slope enhancement in high-frequency niobium cavities”. In: 9th International Particle Accelerator Conference. June 2018.doi: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2018-WEPML013

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2018-wepml013 2018

  8. [8]

    Benedikt et al.Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report

    M. Benedikt et al.Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report. Tech. rep. 12. Geneva: CERN, 2025.doi:10.17181/CERN.9DKX.TDH9. arXiv:2505.00272.url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2928193

    work page doi:10.17181/cern.9dkx.tdh9 2025

  9. [9]

    Benedikt et al.Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report Volume 2

    M. Benedikt et al.Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report Volume 2. Tech. rep. 19. 2025, pp. 5713–6197.doi:10.17181/CERN.EBAY.7W4X. arXiv:2505.00274.url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2928793

    work page doi:10.17181/cern.ebay.7w4x 2025

  10. [10]

    Benedikt et al.Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report

    M. Benedikt et al.Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report. Tech. rep. 17. Geneva: CERN, 2025.doi:10.17181/CERN.I26X.V4VF. arXiv:2505.00273.url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2928194

    work page doi:10.17181/cern.i26x.v4vf 2025

  11. [11]

    The ITER Magnets: Design and Construction Status

    N. Mitchell et al. “The ITER Magnets: Design and Construction Status”. In:IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity22.3 (2012), pp. 4200809–4200809.doi: 10.1109/TASC.2011.2174560

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2011.2174560 2012

  12. [12]

    D. C. Mattis and J. Bardeen. In:Phys. Rev.111 (1958), p. 412

    work page 1958

  13. [13]

    Nb 3Sn superconducting radiofrequency cavities: fabrication, results, properties, and prospects

    S Posen and D L Hall. “Nb 3Sn superconducting radiofrequency cavities: fabrication, results, properties, and prospects”. In:Superconductor Science and Technology30.3 (Jan. 2017), p. 033004.doi:10.1088/1361-6668/30/3/033004.url: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/30/3/033004

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/30/3/033004.url: 2017

  14. [14]

    Development of Nb 3Sn Coating System and RF Measurement Results at KEK

    Hayato Ito et al. “Development of Nb 3Sn Coating System and RF Measurement Results at KEK”. In:JACoWSRF2023 (2023), pp. 414–418.doi:10.18429/JACoW-SRF2023-TUPTB014. 12 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-srf2023-tuptb014 2023

  15. [15]

    Insulation systems for Nb 3Sn accelerator magnet coils manufactured by the wind and react technique

    A. Devred. “Insulation systems for Nb 3Sn accelerator magnet coils manufactured by the wind and react technique”. In:IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.12 (2002), pp. 1232–1237.doi: 10.1109/TASC.2002.1018624

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2002.1018624 2002

  16. [16]

    A comparative study of copper thin films deposited using magnetron sputtering and supercritical fluid deposition techniques

    B. Giroire et al. “A comparative study of copper thin films deposited using magnetron sputtering and supercritical fluid deposition techniques”. In:Thin Solid Films643 (2017). Functional Oxides – Synthesis, structure, properties and applications (Symposium Z EMRS Fall Meeting 2016), pp. 53–59.issn: 0040-6090.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2017.09.002....

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2017.09.002.url: 2017

  17. [17]

    Radio-frequency electromagnetic field and vortex penetration in multilayered superconductors

    Takayuki Kubo, Yoshihisa Iwashita, and Takayuki Saeki. “Radio-frequency electromagnetic field and vortex penetration in multilayered superconductors”. In:Applied Physics Letters 104.3 (2014).issn: 1077-3118.doi:10.1063/1.4862892.url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4862892

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4862892.url: 2014

  18. [18]

    Evaluation of superconducting characteristics on the thin-film structure by NbN and Insulator coatings on pure Nb substrate

    Ryo Katayama et al. “Evaluation of superconducting characteristics on the thin-film structure by NbN and Insulator coatings on pure Nb substrate”. In:9th International Particle Accelerator Conference. Vancouver, Canada, 2018, THPAL015.doi: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2018-THPAL015.url:https://hal.science/hal-01871668

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2018-thpal015.url:https://hal.science/hal-01871668 2018

  19. [19]

    Theory of RF superconductivity for resonant cavities

    Alex Gurevich. “Theory of RF superconductivity for resonant cavities”. In:Superconductor Science and Technology30.3 (2017), p. 034004.doi:10.1088/1361-6668/30/3/034004.url: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/30/3/034004

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/30/3/034004.url: 2017

  20. [20]

    Potential of Nonconventional Superconductors for Particle Accelerator Cavities

    Akira Miyazaki. “Potential of Nonconventional Superconductors for Particle Accelerator Cavities”. In:IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity34.7 (2024), pp. 1–6.doi: 10.1109/TASC.2024.3430067

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2024.3430067 2024

  21. [21]

    Progress in wire fabrication of iron-based superconductors

    Yanwei Ma. “Progress in wire fabrication of iron-based superconductors”. In:Superconductor Science and Technology25.11 (2012), p. 113001.doi:10.1088/0953-2048/25/11/113001. url:https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/25/11/113001

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-2048/25/11/113001 2012

  22. [22]

    Microwave properties of Fe(Se,Te) thin films in a magnetic field: pinning and flux flow

    Nicola Pompeo et al. “Microwave properties of Fe(Se,Te) thin films in a magnetic field: pinning and flux flow”. In:Journal of Physics: Conference Series1559.1 (2020), p. 012055. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1559/1/012055.url: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1559/1/012055

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1559/1/012055.url: 2020

  23. [23]

    Tunable critical temperature for superconductivity in FeSe thin films by pulsed laser deposition

    Zhongpei Feng et al. “Tunable critical temperature for superconductivity in FeSe thin films by pulsed laser deposition”. English. In:Scientific Reports8.1 (2018).issn: 2045-2322.doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22291-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22291-z 2018

  24. [24]

    Evaluation of the nonlinear surface resistance of REBCO coated conductors for their use in the FCC-hh beam screen

    P Krkoti´ c et al. “Evaluation of the nonlinear surface resistance of REBCO coated conductors for their use in the FCC-hh beam screen”. In:Superconductor Science and Technology35.2 (2022), p. 025015.doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ac4465.url: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ac4465

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ac4465.url: 2022

  25. [25]

    Thin Film (High Temperature) Superconducting Radiofrequency Cavities for the Search of Axion Dark Matter

    J. Golm et al. “Thin Film (High Temperature) Superconducting Radiofrequency Cavities for the Search of Axion Dark Matter”. In:IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.32.4 (2022), p. 1500605.doi:10.1109/TASC.2022.3147741. arXiv:2110.01296.url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2784909

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2022.3147741 2022

  26. [26]

    Ankur Dhar et al.Phase Transition Dynamics Induced by Strong Radio-Frequency Fields in ReBCO High Temperature Superconductors. 2025. arXiv:2509.13668 [physics.acc-ph]. url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13668

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Status of superconducting cavities in LEP

    J. P. H. Sladen. “Status of superconducting cavities in LEP”. In:Part. Accel.60 (1998). Ed. by V. Palmieri and A. Lombardi, pp. 15–25

    work page 1998

  28. [28]

    The LHC superconducting cavities

    D. Boussard et al. “The LHC superconducting cavities”. In:Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366). Vol. 2. 1999, 946–948 vol.2.doi: 10.1109/PAC.1999.795409

    work page doi:10.1109/pac.1999.795409 1999

  29. [29]

    Status of ALPI and Related Developments of Superconducting Structures

    Graziano Fortuna et al. “Status of ALPI and Related Developments of Superconducting Structures”. In: 1996.url:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16522066

    work page 1996

  30. [30]

    Status of the SOLEIL Superconducting RF System

    Massamba Diop et al. “Status of the SOLEIL Superconducting RF System”. In:18th International Conference on RF Superconductivity. 2018, MOPB041.doi: 10.18429/JACoW-SRF2017-MOPB041

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-srf2017-mopb041 2018

  31. [31]

    Status of the Superconducting RF Activities for the HIE ISOLDE Project

    Walter Venturini Delsolaro et al. “Status of the Superconducting RF Activities for the HIE ISOLDE Project”. In:26th International Linear Accelerator Conference. 2013, TUPB047. 13 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Study of the surface resistance of superconducting niobium films at 1.5 GHz

    C. Benvenuti et al. “Study of the surface resistance of superconducting niobium films at 1.5 GHz”. In:Physica C: Superconductivity316 (3 1999), pp. 153–188.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4534(99)00207-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0921-4534(99)00207-5 1999

  33. [33]

    Two different origins of theQ-slope problem in superconducting niobium film cavities for a heavy ion accelerator at CERN

    A. Miyazaki and W. Venturini Delsolaro. “Two different origins of theQ-slope problem in superconducting niobium film cavities for a heavy ion accelerator at CERN”. In:Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams22 (7 July 2019), p. 073101.doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.073101. url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.073101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.22.073101 2019

  34. [34]

    Superconducting cavities: Basics

    W. Weingarten. “Superconducting cavities: Basics”. In:ICTP School on Nonaccelerator Particle Astrophysics. 1995, pp. 311–334

    work page 1995

  35. [35]

    Enhancement of rf breakdown field of superconductors by multilayer coating

    A. Gurevich. “Enhancement of rf breakdown field of superconductors by multilayer coating”. In:Applied Physics Letters88.1 (Jan. 2006), p. 012511.issn: 0003-6951.doi: 10.1063/1.2162264. eprint:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2162264/14341525/012511_1_online.pdf.url: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2162264

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2162264 2006

  36. [36]

    Surface Barrier in Type-II Superconductors

    C. P. Bean and J. D. Livingston. “Surface Barrier in Type-II Superconductors”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.12 (1964), pp. 14–16.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.14

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.12.14 1964

  37. [37]

    Maximum screening fields of superconducting multilayer structures

    Alex Gurevich. “Maximum screening fields of superconducting multilayer structures”. In: AIP Advances5.1 (Jan. 2015), p. 017112.issn: 2158-3226.doi:10.1063/1.4905711. eprint: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4905711/12815010/017112_1_online.pdf.url: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4905711

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4905711 2015

  38. [38]

    Multilayer coating for higher accelerating fields in superconducting radio-frequency cavities: a review of theoretical aspects

    Takayuki Kubo. “Multilayer coating for higher accelerating fields in superconducting radio-frequency cavities: a review of theoretical aspects”. In:Superconductor Science and Technology30.2 (Dec. 2016), p. 023001.doi:10.1088/1361-6668/30/2/023001.url: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/30/2/023001

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/30/2/023001.url: 2016

  39. [39]

    Nuclear magnetic relaxation and superfluid density in Fe-pnictide superconductors: an anisotropic±s-wave scenario

    Yuki Nagai et al. “Nuclear magnetic relaxation and superfluid density in Fe-pnictide superconductors: an anisotropic±s-wave scenario”. In:New Journal of Physics10.10 (Oct. 2008), p. 103026.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/10/103026.url: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/10/103026

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/10/103026.url: 2008

  40. [40]

    HiPIMS-Coated Novel S(I)S Multilayers for SRF Cavities

    A. Ozdem Sezgin et al. “HiPIMS-Coated Novel S(I)S Multilayers for SRF Cavities”. In: JACoWIPAC2022 (2022), TUPOTK016.doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-TUPOTK016

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2022-tupotk016 2022

  41. [41]

    Evidence for current suppression in superconductor–superconductor bilayers

    Md Asaduzzaman et al. “Evidence for current suppression in superconductor–superconductor bilayers”. In:Superconductor Science and Technology37.2 (Dec. 2023), p. 025002.doi: 10.1088/1361-6668/ad1462.url:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad1462

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ad1462.url:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad1462 2023

  42. [42]

    Superheating field in superconductors with nanostructured surfaces

    W. P. M. R. Pathirana and A. Gurevich. “Superheating field in superconductors with nanostructured surfaces”. In:Frontiers in Electronic MaterialsVolume 3 - 2023 (2023).issn: 2673-9895.doi:10.3389/femat.2023.1246016.url: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/electronic- materials/articles/10.3389/femat.2023.1246016

    work page doi:10.3389/femat.2023.1246016.url: 2023

  43. [43]

    Nb 3Sn Thin Film Coating Method for Superconducting Multilayered Structure

    Ryohei Ito et al. “Nb 3Sn Thin Film Coating Method for Superconducting Multilayered Structure”. In:19th International Conference on RF Superconductivity (SRF 2019). 2019, TUP077.doi:10.18429/JACoW-SRF2019-TUP077

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-srf2019-tup077 2019

  44. [44]

    Demonstration ofE acc = 10 MV m−1 with Nb3Sn cavities in a cryomodule

    G Eremeev et al. “Demonstration ofE acc = 10 MV m−1 with Nb3Sn cavities in a cryomodule”. In:Superconductor Science and Technology38.7 (July 2025), 07LT01.doi: 10.1088/1361-6668/ade82d.url:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ade82d

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ade82d.url:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ade82d 2025

  45. [45]

    Advances in Nb 3Sn superconducting radiofrequency cavities towards first practical accelerator applications

    S Posen et al. “Advances in Nb 3Sn superconducting radiofrequency cavities towards first practical accelerator applications”. In:Superconductor Science and Technology34.2 (Jan. 2021), p. 025007.doi:10.1088/1361-6668/abc7f7.url: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/abc7f7

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/abc7f7.url: 2021

  46. [46]

    Preparation and characterization of high-quality FeSe single crystal thin films

    Yang Hua et al. “Preparation and characterization of high-quality FeSe single crystal thin films”. In:Acta Physica Sinica67.20 (2018), pp. 207416–207416.issn: 1000-3290.doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180940

    work page doi:10.7498/aps.67.20180940 2018

  47. [47]

    S.Posen and M.Liepe.Nb 3Sn – PRESENT STATUS AND POTENTIAL AS AN ALTERNATIVE SRF MATERIAL. 2014. eprint:TUIOC03.url: https://inspirehep.net/files/af6085dedbc4408863fba0352298e855. 14 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Physical properties of FeSe 0.5Te0.5 single crystals grown under different conditions

    V. Tsurkan et al. “Physical properties of FeSe 0.5Te0.5 single crystals grown under different conditions”. In:The European Physical Journal B79.3 (Jan. 2011), pp. 289–299.issn: 1434-6036.doi:10.1140/epjb/e2010-10473-5.url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2010-10473-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2010-10473-5.url: 2011

  49. [49]

    Superconducting gap structure of FeSe

    Lin Jiao et al. “Superconducting gap structure of FeSe”. In:Scientific Reports7 (2017).issn: 2045-2322.doi:10.1038/srep44024.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44024

    work page doi:10.1038/srep44024.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44024 2017

  50. [50]

    Review of RF Properties of NbN and MgB 2 Thin Coating on Nb Samples and Cavities

    G. V. Eremeev. “Review of RF Properties of NbN and MgB 2 Thin Coating on Nb Samples and Cavities”. In:Proc. SRF’09(Berlin, Germany, Sep. 2009). JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 159–163.url:https://jacow.org/SRF2009/papers/TUOBAU08.pdf

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    Layered iron-based superconductors for SRF cavities

    Akira Miyazaki. “Layered iron-based superconductors for SRF cavities”. 2024

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Energy gap measurement of niobium nitride

    K. Komenou, T. Yamashita, and Y. Onodera. “Energy gap measurement of niobium nitride”. In:Physics Letters A28.5 (1968), pp. 335–336.issn: 0375-9601.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(68)90319-8.url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375960168903198

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(68)90319-8.url: 1968

  53. [53]

    Superconducting RF materials other than bulk niobium: a review

    Anne-Marie Valente-Feliciano. “Superconducting RF materials other than bulk niobium: a review”. In:Superconductor Science and Technology29.11 (Sept. 2016).doi: 10.1088/0953-2048/29/11/113002

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-2048/29/11/113002 2016

  54. [54]

    Normal-state transport in superconducting NbN films on r-cut sapphire

    M D Soldatenkova et al. “Normal-state transport in superconducting NbN films on r-cut sapphire”. In:Journal of Physics: Conference Series2086.1 (Dec. 2021), p. 012212.doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2086/1/012212.url: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2086/1/012212

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2086/1/012212.url: 2021

  55. [55]

    Materials for superconducting cavities

    B. Bonin. “Materials for superconducting cavities”. In:ICTP School on Nonaccelerator Particle Astrophysics. 1995, pp. 191–200

    work page 1995

  56. [56]

    Synthesis of Superconducting Nb 3Sn Thin Film Heterostructures for the Study of High-Energy RF Physics

    Christopher Sundahl. “Synthesis of Superconducting Nb 3Sn Thin Film Heterostructures for the Study of High-Energy RF Physics”. PhD thesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Jan. 2019

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Nb 3Sn superconducting radiofrequency cavities: development and applications

    Sam Posen et al. “Nb 3Sn superconducting radiofrequency cavities: development and applications”. In:APS April Meeting Abstracts. Vol. 2022. APS Meeting Abstracts. Apr. 2022, E07.005, E07.005

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    On properties of superconducting Nb 3Sn used as coatings in RF cavities

    P. Kneisel et al. “On properties of superconducting Nb 3Sn used as coatings in RF cavities”. In:IEEE Transactions on Magnetics13.1 (1977), pp. 496–499.doi: 10.1109/TMAG.1977.1059389

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.1977.1059389 1977

  59. [59]

    GLAG theory for superconducting property variations with A15 composition in Nb 3Sn wires

    Yingxu Li and Yuanwen Gao. “GLAG theory for superconducting property variations with A15 composition in Nb 3Sn wires”. In:Scientific Reports7.1 (Apr. 2017).issn: 2045-2322. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01292-4.url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01292-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01292-4.url: 2017

  60. [60]

    Residual Resistance Ratio in Nb 3Sn Strands During ITER TF Conductor Manufacture and After SULTAN Tests

    Sergey S. Fetisov et al. “Residual Resistance Ratio in Nb 3Sn Strands During ITER TF Conductor Manufacture and After SULTAN Tests”. In:IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity24.3 (2014), pp. 1–5.doi:10.1109/TASC.2013.2290283

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2013.2290283 2014

  61. [61]

    Critical Fields of Nb 3Sn Prepared for Superconducting Cavities

    S. Keckert et al. “Critical Fields of Nb 3Sn Prepared for Superconducting Cavities”. In: Supercond. Sci. Technol.32.7 (2019), p. 075004.doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ab119e. arXiv: 1810.13301 [physics.acc-ph]. 15

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ab119e 2019