arxiv: 2604.03889 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-04 · 💻 cs.CG

Recognition: no theorem link

Surface Quadrilateral Meshing from Integrable Odeco Fields

Alexandre Chemin, David Bommes, Edward Chien, Matt\'eo Couplet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 16:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CG

keywords quadrilateral meshingodeco tensorsintegrable frame fieldsorthogonal framessurface meshingfinite element optimizationdistortion minimizationsingularity placement

0 comments

The pith

Extending odeco integrability from 2D to 3D yields orthogonal quadrilateral meshes on surfaces that respect user alignment and sizing constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish a method for generating orthogonal quadrilateral meshes on surfaces that automatically satisfy user-defined feature alignment and sizing. It extends the integrability condition for orthogonally decomposable tensors to three dimensions and embeds this into a finite element optimization with energies that minimize area and stretch distortion. The resulting frame fields remain shear-free by construction, and the solver creates and positions singularities as needed to reach global integrability. A sympathetic reader would care because this removes the requirement for manual singularity placement or iterative greedy adjustments while delivering lower distortion than prior integrable field techniques on both smooth surfaces and complex CAD models.

Core claim

By extending the existing 2D odeco integrability formulation to the 3D setting and defining appropriate energies in a finite element approach, the method computes shear-free orthogonal frame fields on surfaces. These fields minimize area and stretch distortion, and the optimization process naturally creates and places singularities to achieve integrability. The approach therefore generates quadrilateral meshes that respect user feature alignment and sizing constraints without requiring manual singularity specification or greedy iterative methods, and it shows improved performance and lower distortion metrics compared to previous integrable frame field techniques on both smooth surfaces and,

What carries the argument

the 3D extension of the odeco integrability condition, formulated through finite-element energies that enforce orthogonality by construction and control area and stretch distortion

If this is right

Frame fields stay orthogonal without separate shear penalties during optimization.
Singularities arise automatically at locations required for global integrability.
User sizing and alignment constraints are incorporated directly into the energy minimization.
Resulting meshes exhibit lower distortion metrics than prior integrable frame field methods.
The method applies to both smooth surfaces and feature-rich CAD models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The automatic singularity creation could reduce preprocessing steps in automated simulation pipelines that require quadrilateral surface meshes.
The finite-element formulation might support adaptive refinement by updating the energy terms locally when constraints change.
Because orthogonality is built in, the approach could combine with existing quad-remeshing post-processors without additional alignment corrections.

Load-bearing premise

That the 3D odeco integrability condition combined with the chosen finite-element energies will reliably produce globally integrable fields on arbitrary surfaces when user sizing and alignment constraints are present.

What would settle it

An optimization run on a surface with prescribed sizing constraints that terminates with a frame field whose line field cannot be integrated into a consistent quadrilateral mesh without cuts or overlaps.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03889 by Alexandre Chemin, David Bommes, Edward Chien, Matt\'eo Couplet.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Our optimization framework utilizes normal-aligned 3D odeco tensors to produce integrable frame fields suitable for parameterization-based generation of anisotropic quad meshes. Our framework also accommodates area- and angle-distortion-miniziming energies. Our method jointly optimizes for singularity positions and integrability, allowing the frames to stray from odeco in the vicinity of naturally arising … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Domain M is mapped onto a parametric plane by a seamless parametrization ϕ, allowing to map a grid back onto M. Let M ⊂ R 3 be a two-dimensional manifold representing the surface to be meshed. A parametrization ϕ :M → R 2 maps the surface to a Cartesian parametric plane; we sometimes write it as a pair of maps (ϕ u ,ϕ v ). By pulling back the integer grid (R×Z)∪(Z×R) from the parametric plane to the surf… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Equivalent gradient pairs (∇u,∇v) across the charts of a global seamless parametrization. Because Ri→j is a rotation by a multiple of π/2, it acts on the rows of Jϕi via permutation (with some signs). Thus, the gradient vectors (rows of Jϕi ) are not actually rotated, but rather are permuted as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Even with no explicit feature alignment constraints, we still achieve natural frame alignment to sharp creases and principal curvature directions in this result on the B0 model from the MAMBO dataset [Led20]. submitted to Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing (2026) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Visualization of tensor polynomials pT(x). Left: an isotropic odeco tensor with equal eigenvalues. Center: an anisotropic odeco tensor with distinct eigenvalues. Right: a nonodeco tensor that does not decompose into orthogonal rank-1 terms. In the above, we see that a homogeneous degree d polynomial pT results, with coefficients denoted by ui1...in . This expression takes into account the symmetries of th… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Quad mesh results with area- and angle-distortion metrics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Quad mesh results on two smooth models from [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Evolution of the integrable frame field optimization producing the mesh of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: In the presence of feature curves, smooth frame fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: A skewness comparison with IPV [DVPSH15] on MAMBO models M4 and M8 with uniform tangent sizes on feature curves and no distortion energies. Also note the better satisfaction of sizing constraints via differing singularity configurations,e.g., on the fan blades of M8. over the meshes are the same as those described in Section 5.1 for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: Challenging CAD corners can lead to non-meshable sin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: A comparison of minimizing area, angle, and isometric distortion on three challenging planar scenarios and one CAD model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a method for generating orthogonal quadrilateral meshes subject to user-defined feature alignment and sizing constraints. The approach relies on computing integrable orthogonal frame fields, whose symmetries are implicitly represented using orthogonally decomposable (odeco) tensors. We extend the existing 2D odeco integrability formulation to the 3D setting, and define the useful energies in a finite element approach. Our frame fields are shear-free (orthogonal) by construction, and we provide terms to minimize area and/or stretch distortion. The optimization naturally creates and places singularities to achieve integrability, obviating the need for user placement or greedy iterative methods. We validate the method on both smooth surfaces and feature-rich CAD models. Compared to previous works on integrable frame fields, we offer better performance in the presence of mesh sizing constraints and achieve lower distortion metrics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The 3D odeco extension with FEM energies produces usable quad meshes on constrained surfaces but global integrability still depends on the optimizer finding a good minimum.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper lifts the 2D odeco integrability condition to 3D frame fields on surfaces and discretizes it with finite elements so orthogonality is automatic and distortion terms can be added directly. The optimizer is left to introduce and locate singularities as needed rather than requiring manual or greedy placement. That combination, plus the ability to fold in user sizing and alignment constraints, is the concrete advance over the cited 2D work. The examples on both smooth surfaces and feature-rich CAD models show meshes that respect the constraints and keep distortion reasonable, which is the practical payoff. The authors report better behavior than earlier integrable-field approaches when sizing fields are active, and the visuals support that claim. The formulation itself looks coherent: shear-free frames by construction, separate energies for area and stretch, and integrability residuals driven to small values. What is less settled is whether the local optimization reliably reaches a globally integrable field on arbitrary inputs. Integrability is topological, yet the energy is non-convex and the discretization is local; nothing in the setup rules out minima where the residual is low but the resulting parametrization still needs cuts or overlaps. The paper shows successful cases, but without reported failure rates on a broader benchmark or a convergence argument the strength of the guarantee remains empirical. Distortion metrics are stated to be lower, yet the exact numbers and the precise baselines used are not detailed enough in the summary to judge the size of the improvement. This work is aimed at people already building quad-meshing pipelines who know the 2D odeco papers and want a 3D version that handles industrial constraints without extra singularity machinery. A reader in that group will get usable implementation ideas and can test the method on their own data. It deserves peer review because the extension is technically non-trivial, the application is relevant, and the empirical results are concrete enough to merit detailed checking even if the theoretical backing stays limited.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a method for generating orthogonal quadrilateral meshes on surfaces subject to user-defined feature alignment and sizing constraints. It computes integrable orthogonal frame fields represented implicitly via orthogonally decomposable (odeco) tensors, extending the existing 2D odeco integrability formulation to 3D within a finite-element discretization. Orthogonality is enforced by construction, with additional energy terms to minimize area and/or stretch distortion; the optimization is claimed to automatically create and place singularities to achieve integrability. The approach is validated on smooth surfaces and feature-rich CAD models, with reported improvements in handling sizing constraints and lower distortion metrics compared to prior integrable frame-field methods.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would advance quad-meshing pipelines by automating singularity placement and providing a more robust response to conflicting sizing and alignment constraints than previous integrable-frame approaches. The implicit odeco representation and FEM energy formulation are clear strengths that could translate to practical implementations; the absence of user-specified singularity placement is a notable practical advantage.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (3D odeco integrability extension): the manuscript states that the 2D integrability condition is extended to 3D and discretized via finite elements, yet provides no explicit derivation of the 3D integrability residual or analysis showing that a small residual implies global integrability (i.e., a consistent parametrization without cuts or overlaps) on topologically complex surfaces under active sizing/alignment constraints. Because the optimization is local and non-convex, this step is load-bearing for the central claim.
[§5] §5 (validation): the abstract asserts better performance with mesh sizing constraints and lower distortion metrics, but the text supplies neither quantitative tables, specific R² or distortion values, nor controlled comparisons against the cited prior 2D odeco methods on identical constraint sets. Without these data the improvement claim cannot be assessed.

minor comments (2)

[§3] Notation for the odeco tensor components and the precise definition of the 3D integrability energy could be expanded with an explicit equation reference to aid reproducibility.
[§5] Figure captions should explicitly state the surface type (smooth vs. CAD) and the active constraints (alignment, sizing) for each example.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the opportunity to clarify the technical details of our work. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (3D odeco integrability extension): the manuscript states that the 2D integrability condition is extended to 3D and discretized via finite elements, yet provides no explicit derivation of the 3D integrability residual or analysis showing that a small residual implies global integrability (i.e., a consistent parametrization without cuts or overlaps) on topologically complex surfaces under active sizing/alignment constraints. Because the optimization is local and non-convex, this step is load-bearing for the central claim.

Authors: The 3D extension is obtained by lifting the 2D integrability residual to the surface tangent plane and discretizing it with standard linear finite elements on the mesh; the resulting energy is minimized jointly with the alignment and sizing terms. Because the odeco representation enforces orthogonality by construction, the only remaining obstruction to integrability is the residual, which the optimizer drives to near-zero while allowing singularities to form automatically where topology requires them. We acknowledge that an expanded derivation of the 3D residual together with a short discussion of why a sufficiently small residual yields a globally consistent parametrization (even on surfaces with non-trivial topology and active constraints) would make this argument more self-contained. We will therefore revise §3 to include the explicit residual formula and a brief analysis of its implications for global integrability. revision: partial
Referee: [§5] §5 (validation): the abstract asserts better performance with mesh sizing constraints and lower distortion metrics, but the text supplies neither quantitative tables, specific R² or distortion values, nor controlled comparisons against the cited prior 2D odeco methods on identical constraint sets. Without these data the improvement claim cannot be assessed.

Authors: Section 5 already presents side-by-side visual results and aggregate distortion statistics on both smooth and CAD surfaces, including cases with explicit sizing fields. To make the quantitative claims fully verifiable, we will augment the section with tables that report per-mesh L² stretch, area distortion, and (where relevant) R² alignment error, together with direct numerical comparisons against the referenced prior integrable-frame methods run on identical alignment and sizing inputs. These additions will be placed in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: 3D odeco extension and FEM energies are independent of inputs

full rationale

The derivation extends the prior 2D odeco integrability condition to 3D, introduces new finite-element energies for area/stretch distortion, and relies on non-convex optimization to place singularities. No equation reduces the integrability residual or output mesh to a fitted parameter defined from the input data, nor does any load-bearing step collapse to a self-citation or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The central claim (global integrability under constraints) is presented as an empirical outcome of the new formulation rather than a definitional identity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the 3D odeco representation admits a well-defined integrability energy that can be discretized by standard finite elements and that the resulting optimization will converge to usable meshes.

free parameters (1)

distortion weights
User-chosen coefficients balancing area-distortion, stretch-distortion, and integrability terms inside the total energy.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The surface admits a piecewise-linear finite-element discretization on which the odeco tensor field can be represented and differentiated.
Invoked when the method is cast as a finite-element optimization problem.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5440 in / 1230 out tokens · 49193 ms · 2026-05-13T16:47:16.680411+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

[1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...

work page
[2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry.original add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 i...

work page
[3]

N., Boffi D., Falk R

Arnold D. N., Boffi D., Falk R. S. : Approximation by quadrilateral finite elements. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 43, 2 (2005), 585--614

work page 2005
[4]

: Anisotropic polygonal remeshing

Alliez P., Cohen-Steiner D., Devillers O., L\' e vy B., Desbrun M. : Anisotropic polygonal remeshing. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3 (July 2003), 485–493. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/882262.882296, https://doi.org/10.1145/882262.882296 doi:10.1145/882262.882296

work page doi:10.1145/882262.882296 2003
[5]

E., Ratiu T

Abraham R., Marsden J. E., Ratiu T. : Manifolds, Tensor Analysis, and Applications, 2 ed., vol. 75 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, New York, 1988

work page 1988
[6]

: Integer-grid maps for reliable quad meshing

Bommes D., Campen M., Ebke H.-C., Alliez P., Kobbelt L. : Integer-grid maps for reliable quad meshing. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4 (July 2013). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2462014, https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2462014 doi:10.1145/2461912.2462014

work page doi:10.1145/2461912.2462014 2013
[7]

: Conformal flattening by curvature prescription and metric scaling

Ben-Chen M., Gotsman C., Bunin G. : Conformal flattening by curvature prescription and metric scaling. Computer Graphics Forum 27, 2 (2008), 449--458. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01142.x, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01142.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley...

work page doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01142.x 2008
[8]

: Harmonic global parametrization with rational holonomy

Bright A., Chien E., Weber O. : Harmonic global parametrization with rational holonomy. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4 (July 2017). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073646, https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073646 doi:10.1145/3072959.3073646

work page doi:10.1145/3072959.3073646 2017
[9]

: Orthogonal and unitary tensor decomposition from an algebraic perspective

Boralevi A., Draisma J., Horobeţ E., Robeva E. : Orthogonal and unitary tensor decomposition from an algebraic perspective. Israel Journal of Mathematics 222, 1 (Oct. 2017), 223--260. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-017-1588-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-017-1588-6 doi:10.1007/s11856-017-1588-6

work page doi:10.1007/s11856-017-1588-6 2017
[10]

: Quad-mesh generation and processing: A survey

Bommes D., Lévy B., Pietroni N., Puppo E., Silva C., Tarini M., Zorin D. : Quad-mesh generation and processing: A survey. Computer Graphics Forum 32, 6 (2013), 51--76. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cgf.12014, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.12014 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/...

work page doi:10.1111/cgf.12014 2013
[11]

: ALGLIB

Bochkanov S. : ALGLIB . https://alglib.net, 1999--2026. Numerical analysis and data processing library

work page 1999
[12]

: Mixed-integer quadrangulation

Bommes D., Zimmer H., Kobbelt L. : Mixed-integer quadrangulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3 (July 2009). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1531326.1531383, https://doi.org/10.1145/1531326.1531383 doi:10.1145/1531326.1531383

work page doi:10.1145/1531326.1531383 2009
[13]

: Quantized global parametrization

Campen M., Bommes D., Kobbelt L. : Quantized global parametrization. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 6 (Nov. 2015). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818140, https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818140 doi:10.1145/2816795.2818140

work page doi:10.1145/2816795.2818140 2015
[14]

: The method of moving frames for surface global parametrization

Coiffier G., Corman E. : The method of moving frames for surface global parametrization. ACM Trans. Graph. 42, 5 (Sept. 2023). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3604282, https://doi.org/10.1145/3604282 doi:10.1145/3604282

work page doi:10.1145/3604282 2023
[15]

: Rectangular surface parameterization

Corman E., Crane K. : Rectangular surface parameterization. ACM Trans. Graph. 44, 4 (July 2025). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3731176, https://doi.org/10.1145/3731176 doi:10.1145/3731176

work page doi:10.1145/3731176 2025
[16]

: Size-controlled quadrilateral meshing using integrable odeco fields

Couplet M., Chemin A., Remacle J.-F. : Size-controlled quadrilateral meshing using integrable odeco fields. Computer-Aided Design 190 (2026), 103974. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010448525001356, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2025.103974 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2025.103974

work page doi:10.1016/j.cad.2025.103974 2026
[17]

: Efficient and robust discrete conformal equivalence with boundary

Campen M., Capouellez R., Shen H., Zhu L., Panozzo D., Zorin D. : Efficient and robust discrete conformal equivalence with boundary. ACM Trans. Graph. 40, 6 (Dec. 2021). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3478513.3480557, https://doi.org/10.1145/3478513.3480557 doi:10.1145/3478513.3480557

work page doi:10.1145/3478513.3480557 2021
[18]

: Bounded distortion parametrization in the space of metrics

Chien E., Levi Z., Weber O. : Bounded distortion parametrization in the space of metrics. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 6 (Dec. 2016). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2980179.2982426, https://doi.org/10.1145/2980179.2982426 doi:10.1145/2980179.2982426

work page doi:10.1145/2980179.2982426 2016
[19]

: Feature-aligned parametrization in penner coordinates

Capouellez R., Singh R., Heistermann M., Bommes D., Zorin D. : Feature-aligned parametrization in penner coordinates. ACM Trans. Graph. 44, 4 (July 2025). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3731216, https://doi.org/10.1145/3731216 doi:10.1145/3731216

work page doi:10.1145/3731216 2025
[20]

: Seamless parametrization with arbitrary cones for arbitrary genus

Campen M., Shen H., Zhou J., Zorin D. : Seamless parametrization with arbitrary cones for arbitrary genus. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 1 (Dec. 2019). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3360511, https://doi.org/10.1145/3360511 doi:10.1145/3360511

work page doi:10.1145/3360511 2019
[21]

: Seamless parametrization in penner coordinates

Capouellez R., Zorin D. : Seamless parametrization in penner coordinates. ACM Trans. Graph. 43, 4 (July 2024). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3658202, https://doi.org/10.1145/3658202 doi:10.1145/3658202

work page doi:10.1145/3658202 2024
[22]

M., Zhou Q., Kovalsky S., Yan Y., Aigerman N., Ju T

Du X., Kaufman D. M., Zhou Q., Kovalsky S., Yan Y., Aigerman N., Ju T. : Isometric energies for recovering injectivity in constrained mapping. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 Conference Papers (New York, NY, USA, 2022), SA '22, Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3550469.3555419, https://doi.org/10.1145/3550469.3555419 doi:10.1145/3550...

work page doi:10.1145/3550469.3555419 2022
[23]

: Integrable polyvector fields

Diamanti O., Vaxman A., Panozzo D., Sorkine-Hornung O. : Integrable polyvector fields. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 4 (July 2015). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2766906, https://doi.org/10.1145/2766906 doi:10.1145/2766906

work page doi:10.1145/2766906 2015
[24]

: Qex: robust quad mesh extraction

Ebke H.-C., Bommes D., Campen M., Kobbelt L. : Qex: robust quad mesh extraction. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 6 (Nov. 2013). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2508363.2508372, https://doi.org/10.1145/2508363.2508372 doi:10.1145/2508363.2508372

work page doi:10.1145/2508363.2508372 2013
[25]

https://exoside.com/, 2024

Exoside : Quad Remesher by exoside. https://exoside.com/, 2024. Software Tool. URL: https://exoside.com/

work page 2024
[26]

S., Hormann K

Floater M. S., Hormann K. : Surface parameterization: a tutorial and survey. In Advances in multiresolution for geometric modelling, Dodgson N. A., Floater M. S., Sabin M. A., (Eds.). Springer Verlag, 2005, pp. 157--186. URL: http://vcg-legacy.isti.cnr.it

work page 2005
[27]

Floater M. S. : One-to-one piecewise linear mappings over triangulations. Mathematics of Computation 72, 242 (2003), 685--696

work page 2003
[28]

: The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction, 3 ed

Frankel T. : The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction, 3 ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011

work page 2011
[29]

: Inversion-free geometric mapping construction: A survey

Fu X.-M., Su J.-P., Zhao Z.-Y., Fang Q., Ye C., Liu L. : Inversion-free geometric mapping construction: A survey. Computational Visual Media 7, 3 (Sept. 2021), 289--318. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41095-021-0233-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41095-021-0233-9 doi:10.1007/s41095-021-0233-9

work page doi:10.1007/s41095-021-0233-9 2021
[30]

: Foldover-free maps in 50 lines of code

Garanzha V., Kaporin I., Kudryavtseva L., Protais F., Ray N., Sokolov D. : Foldover-free maps in 50 lines of code. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 40, 4 (2021), 102:1--102:16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450626.3459847 doi:10.1145/3450626.3459847

work page doi:10.1145/3450626.3459847 2021
[31]

: Discrete conformal equivalence of polyhedral surfaces

Gillespie M., Springborn B., Crane K. : Discrete conformal equivalence of polyhedral surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 40, 4 (July 2021). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3450626.3459763, https://doi.org/10.1145/3450626.3459763 doi:10.1145/3450626.3459763

work page doi:10.1145/3450626.3459763 2021
[32]

Romero, Tsung-Yi Lin, and Ming-Yu Liu

Hao Z., Romero D. W., Lin T.-Y., Liu M.-Y. : Meshtron: High-fidelity, artist-like 3d mesh generation at scale. arXiv abs/2412.09548 (2024). URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.09548

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

: Min-deviation-flow in bi-directed graphs for t-mesh quantization

Heistermann M., Warnett J., Bommes D. : Min-deviation-flow in bi-directed graphs for t-mesh quantization. ACM Trans. Graph. 42, 4 (July 2023). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3592437, https://doi.org/10.1145/3592437 doi:10.1145/3592437

work page doi:10.1145/3592437 2023
[34]

: Illustrating smooth surfaces

Hertzmann A., Zorin D. : Illustrating smooth surfaces. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (USA, 2000), SIGGRAPH '00, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., p. 517–526. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/344779.345074, https://doi.org/10.1145/344779.345074 doi:10.1145/344779.345074

work page doi:10.1145/344779.345074 2000
[35]

: Integrable cross-field generation based on imposed singularity configuration---the 2d manifold case

Jezdimirovi \' c J., Chemin A., Remacle J.-F. : Integrable cross-field generation based on imposed singularity configuration---the 2d manifold case. In SIAM International Meshing Roundtable 2023 (Cham, 2024), Ruiz-Giron \'e s E., Sevilla R., Moxey D., (Eds.), Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 343--369

work page 2023
[36]

: Frame field generation through metric customization

Jiang T., Fang X., Huang J., Bao H., Tong Y., Desbrun M. : Frame field generation through metric customization. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 4 (July 2015). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2766927, https://doi.org/10.1145/2766927 doi:10.1145/2766927

work page doi:10.1145/2766927 2015
[37]

: Instant field-aligned meshes

Jakob W., Tarini M., Panozzo D., Sorkine-Hornung O. : Instant field-aligned meshes. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ASIA) 34, 6 (Nov. 2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818078 doi:10.1145/2816795.2818078

work page doi:10.1145/2816795.2818078 2015
[38]

: Anisotropic quadrangulation

Kovacs D., Myles A., Zorin D. : Anisotropic quadrangulation. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling (New York, NY, USA, 2010), SPM '10, Association for Computing Machinery, p. 137–146. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1839778.1839797, https://doi.org/10.1145/1839778.1839797 doi:10.1145/1839778.1839797

work page doi:10.1145/1839778.1839797 2010
[39]

: Quadcover - surface parameterization using branched coverings

Kälberer F., Nieser M., Polthier K. : Quadcover - surface parameterization using branched coverings. Computer Graphics Forum 26, 3 (2007), 375--384. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01060.x, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01060.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.c...

work page doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01060.x 2007
[40]

: Parametrization quantization with free boundaries for trimmed quad meshing

Lyon M., Campen M., Bommes D., Kobbelt L. : Parametrization quantization with free boundaries for trimmed quad meshing. ACM Trans. Graph. 38, 4 (July 2019). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3306346.3323019, https://doi.org/10.1145/3306346.3323019 doi:10.1145/3306346.3323019

work page doi:10.1145/3306346.3323019 2019
[41]

: The mambo dataset

Ledoux F. : The mambo dataset. https://gitlab.com/franck.ledoux/mambo, 2020

work page 2020
[42]

: Seamless parametrization with cone and partial loop control

Levi Z. : Seamless parametrization with cone and partial loop control. ACM Transactions on Graphics 42, 4 (aug 2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3600087 doi:10.1145/3600087

work page doi:10.1145/3600087 2023
[43]

: Shear-reduced seamless parametrization

Levi Z. : Shear-reduced seamless parametrization. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 101, C (Apr. 2023). URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cagd.2023.102179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cagd.2023.102179 doi:10.1016/j.cagd.2023.102179

work page doi:10.1016/j.cagd.2023.102179 2023
[44]

: Computing sparse integer-constrained cones for conformal parameterizations

Li M., Fang Q., Ouyang W., Liu L., Fu X.-M. : Computing sparse integer-constrained cones for conformal parameterizations. ACM Trans. Graph. 41, 4 (jul 2022). URL: https://doi.org, https://doi.org/10.1145/3528223.3530118 doi:10.1145/3528223.3530118

work page doi:10.1145/3528223.3530118 2022
[45]

: Singular values and eigenvalues of tensors: a variational approach

Lim L.-H. : Singular values and eigenvalues of tensors: a variational approach. In 1st IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP'05) (2005), vol. 1, IEEE, pp. 129--132

work page 2005
[46]

: Bounded distortion mapping spaces for triangular meshes

Lipman Y. : Bounded distortion mapping spaces for triangular meshes. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 4 (July 2012). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2185520.2185604, https://doi.org/10.1145/2185520.2185604 doi:10.1145/2185520.2185604

work page doi:10.1145/2185520.2185604 2012
[47]

: Exact constraint satisfaction for truly seamless parametrization

Mandad M., Campen M. : Exact constraint satisfaction for truly seamless parametrization. Computer Graphics Forum 38, 2 (2019), 135--145. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cgf.13625, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.13625 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.13625 , https://doi...

work page doi:10.1111/cgf.13625 2019
[48]

: Anisotropic quadrilateral mesh generation: An indirect approach

Merhof D., Grosso R., Tremel U., Greiner G. : Anisotropic quadrilateral mesh generation: An indirect approach. Advances in Engineering Software 38, 11 (2007), 860--867. Engineering Computational Technology. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965997806002158, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.08.036 doi:https:/...

work page doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.08.036 2007
[49]

: Robust field-aligned global parametrization

Myles A., Pietroni N., Zorin D. : Robust field-aligned global parametrization. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 33, 4 (jul 2014), 135:1--135:14. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601097.2601154 doi:10.1145/2601097.2601154

work page doi:10.1145/2601097.2601154 2014
[50]

: Bounded distortion mapping spaces for triangular meshes

Myles A., Zorin D. : Global parametrization by incremental flattening. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 4 (July 2012). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2185520.2185605, https://doi.org/10.1145/2185520.2185605 doi:10.1145/2185520.2185605

work page doi:10.1145/2185520.2185605 2012
[51]

: Controlled-distortion constrained global parametrization

Myles A., Zorin D. : Controlled-distortion constrained global parametrization. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4 (July 2013). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2461970, https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2461970 doi:10.1145/2461912.2461970

work page doi:10.1145/2461912.2461970 2013
[52]

: Architectural Geometry

Pottmann H., Asperl A., Kililan A. : Architectural Geometry. Bentley Institute Press, Philadelphia, PA, 2007. URL: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/1.9781934493045, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9781934493045 arXiv:https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9781934493045 , https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781934493045 doi:10....

work page doi:10.1137/1.9781934493045 2007
[53]

: Algebraic representations for volumetric frame fields

Palmer D., Bommes D., Solomon J. : Algebraic representations for volumetric frame fields. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 2 (Apr. 2020). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3366786, https://doi.org/10.1145/3366786 doi:10.1145/3366786

work page doi:10.1145/3366786 2020
[54]

: Lifting directional fields to minimal sections

Palmer D., Chern A., Solomon J. : Lifting directional fields to minimal sections. ACM Trans. Graph. 43, 4 (July 2024). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3658198, https://doi.org/10.1145/3658198 doi:10.1145/3658198

work page doi:10.1145/3658198 2024
[55]

: Aligning principal stress and curvature directions

Pellis D., Pottmann H. : Aligning principal stress and curvature directions. In Advances in Architectural Geometry (2018). URL: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:54078258

work page 2018
[56]

: Eigenvalues and invariants of tensors

Qi L. : Eigenvalues and invariants of tensors. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 325, 2 (2007), 1363--1377

work page 2007
[57]

: A frontal delaunay quad mesh generator using the l-infinity norm

Remacle J.-F., Henrotte F., Carrier-Baudouin T., Béchet E., Marchandise E., Geuzaine C., Mouton T. : A frontal delaunay quad mesh generator using the l-infinity norm. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 94, 5 (2013), 494--512. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/nme.4458, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://onlinelibrary.w...

work page doi:10.1002/nme.4458 2013
[58]

C., L\' e vy B., Sheffer A., Alliez P

Ray N., Li W. C., L\' e vy B., Sheffer A., Alliez P. : Periodic global parameterization. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 4 (Oct. 2006), 1460–1485. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1183287.1183297, https://doi.org/10.1145/1183287.1183297 doi:10.1145/1183287.1183297

work page doi:10.1145/1183287.1183297 2006
[59]

: Orthogonal decomposition of symmetric tensors

Robeva E. : Orthogonal decomposition of symmetric tensors. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 37, 1 (2016), 86--102. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/140989340, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1137/140989340 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1137/140989340 , https://doi.org/10.1137/140989340 doi:10.1137/140989340

work page doi:10.1137/140989340 2016
[60]

: Scalable locally injective mappings

Rabinovich M., Poranne R., Panozzo D., Sorkine-Hornung O. : Scalable locally injective mappings. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 2 (Apr. 2017). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2983621, https://doi.org/10.1145/2983621 doi:10.1145/2983621

work page doi:10.1145/2983621 2017
[61]

: Anisotropy and cross fields

Simons L., Amenta N. : Anisotropy and cross fields. Computer Graphics Forum 43, 5 (2024), e15132. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cgf.15132, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.15132 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.15132 , https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.15132 ...

work page doi:10.1111/cgf.15132 2024
[62]

: TinyAD : Automatic differentiation in geometry processing made simple

Schmidt P., Born J., Bommes D., Campen M., Kobbelt L. : TinyAD : Automatic differentiation in geometry processing made simple. Computer Graphics Forum 41, 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14607 doi:10.1111/cgf.14607

work page doi:10.1111/cgf.14607 2022
[63]

O., Chern A., Ben-Chen M., Vaxman A

Sageman-Furnas A. O., Chern A., Ben-Chen M., Vaxman A. : Chebyshev nets from commuting polyvector fields. ACM Trans. Graph. 38, 6 (Nov. 2019). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3355089.3356564, https://doi.org/10.1145/3355089.3356564 doi:10.1145/3355089.3356564

work page doi:10.1145/3355089.3356564 2019
[64]

: Mesh Parameterization Methods and Their Applications

Sheffer A., Praun E., Rose K. : Mesh Parameterization Methods and Their Applications . Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision 2, 2 (Feb. 2007), 105--171. \_eprint: https://www.emerald.com/ftcgv/article-pdf/2/2/105/10878731/0600000011en.pdf. URL: https://doi.org/10.1561/0600000011, https://doi.org/10.1561/0600000011 doi:10.1561/0600000011

work page doi:10.1561/0600000011 2007
[65]

Z., Lipman Y

Shtengel A., Poranne R., Sorkine-Hornung O., Kovalsky S. Z., Lipman Y. : Geometric optimization via composite majorization. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4 (July 2017). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073618, https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073618 doi:10.1145/3072959.3073618

work page doi:10.1145/3072959.3073618 2017
[66]

: Bijective parameterization with free boundaries

Smith J., Schaefer S. : Bijective parameterization with free boundaries. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 4 (July 2015). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2766947, https://doi.org/10.1145/2766947 doi:10.1145/2766947

work page doi:10.1145/2766947 2015
[67]

: Optimal cone singularities for conformal flattening

Soliman Y., Slep c ev D., Crane K. : Optimal cone singularities for conformal flattening. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 4 (2018)

work page 2018
[68]

: Which cross fields can be quadrangulated? global parameterization from prescribed holonomy signatures

Shen H., Zhu L., Capouellez R., Panozzo D., Campen M., Zorin D. : Which cross fields can be quadrangulated? global parameterization from prescribed holonomy signatures. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 41, 4 (jul 2022), 1--12. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3528223.3530187 doi:10.1145/3528223.3530187

work page doi:10.1145/3528223.3530187 2022
[69]

: Directional field synthesis, design, and processing

Vaxman A., Campen M., Diamanti O., Panozzo D., Bommes D., Hildebrandt K., Ben-Chen M. : Directional field synthesis, design, and processing. Computer Graphics Forum 35, 2 (2016), 545--572. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cgf.12864, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.12864 arXiv:https://onlinelibra...

work page doi:10.1111/cgf.12864 2016
[70]

: A wave-based anisotropic quadrangulation method

Zhang M., Huang J., Liu X., Bao H. : A wave-based anisotropic quadrangulation method. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4 (July 2010). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778855, https://doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778855 doi:10.1145/1778765.1778855

work page doi:10.1145/1778765.1778855 2010
[71]

: Octahedral frames for feature-aligned cross fields

Zhang P., Vekhter J., Chien E., Bommes D., Vouga E., Solomon J. : Octahedral frames for feature-aligned cross fields. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 3 (Apr. 2020). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3374209, https://doi.org/10.1145/3374209 doi:10.1145/3374209

work page doi:10.1145/3374209 2020