pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04397 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 🧮 math.OA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A universal property for groupoid C*-algebras. II. Fell bundles

Alcides Buss, Ralf Meyer, Rohit Holkar

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 20:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OA
keywords Fell bundlesgroupoid C*-algebrasuniversal propertysection C*-algebrasRenault theoremsHilbert modulesexact C*-algebrasquasi-orbits
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fell bundles over Hausdorff locally compact groupoids admit a universal property for representations of their full section C*-algebras on Hilbert modules over arbitrary C*-algebras.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines upper semicontinuous Fell bundles, which may be unsaturated, over Hausdorff locally compact groupoids. It establishes a universal property that governs all representations of the associated full section C*-algebras acting on Hilbert modules over any C*-algebra. This property is then used to prove that the full section C*-algebra is functorial and exact, and to introduce a quasi-orbit space together with a quasi-orbit map. Renault's Integration and Disintegration Theorems are deduced and extended to these general Fell bundles as direct applications of the universal property.

Core claim

We define possibly unsaturated, upper semicontinuous Fell bundles over Hausdorff, locally compact groupoids and establish a universal property for representations of their full section C*-algebras on Hilbert modules over arbitrary C*-algebras. Based on this, we prove that the full section C*-algebra is functorial and exact, and we define a quasi-orbit space and a quasi-orbit map. We deduce and extend Renault's Integration and Disintegration Theorems to general Fell bundles using our universal property.

What carries the argument

The universal property for representations of the full section C*-algebra on Hilbert modules over arbitrary C*-algebras.

Load-bearing premise

The groupoids are Hausdorff and locally compact while the Fell bundles are upper semicontinuous, possibly unsaturated.

What would settle it

A concrete representation of a full section C*-algebra of such a Fell bundle that fails to factor through the universal representation when the groupoid is taken non-Hausdorff.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04397 by Alcides Buss, Ralf Meyer, Rohit Holkar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A pair (g, h) ∈ G2 of composable arrows generates a commutative triangle of arrows in G. We number the edges so that the one opposite the vertex vi(g, h) is di(g, h) for i = 0, 1, 2. Definition 3.4. A Fell bundle over G is an upper semicontinuous field of Banach spaces A = (Ag)g∈G with bilinear maps Ag × Ah → Ag·h, (a, b) 7→ a · b, for (g, h) ∈ G2 (multiplication) and conjugate-linear maps Ag → Ag−1 , a 7→… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two parallel isomorphisms of correspondences built from U. Each triangle or quadrilateral means an isomorphism of C ∗ -correspondences. The three quadrilaterals containing U are copies of (4.1). The triangles without label mean the canonical iso￾morphisms of C ∗ -correspondences in (2.9). The triangle marked µ also involves the multiplication map µ: d ∗ 2A ⊗v ∗ 1 A d ∗ 0A ,→ d ∗ 1A that acts on fibres as i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The unitary d ∗ 1 (U) as the composite of id ⊗ U with two canonical isomorphisms γ1 and γ2 from Lemma 2.8. described by the first diagram in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The first column defines a unitary U ′ h (g) for all (g, h) ∈ G2 with gh, g ∈ X1. Here the unlabelled unitaries are built from the isomorphisms in Lemma 3.7 and the equality I ·J = J ·I for two ideals in a C ∗ -algebra. The two horizontal isometries are induced by the multiplication in the Fell bundle. The unitary U¯ h is required to make the whole diagram commute for α˜r(h) -almost all g ∈ Gr(h) . This co… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The gist of the proof of Lemma 9.36. The data is a chain of three composable arrows x k −→ y h −→ z g −→ w. The unlabelled arrows in the diagram are induced by the multiplication in the Fell bundle, tensored with the identity on the appropriate fibre of H. When marked with “∼=”, then they are invertible by a repeated application of Lemma 3.7. Otherwise, they are only isometries. The arrows marked with Ul o… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We define possibly unsaturated, upper semicontinuous Fell bundles over Hausdorff, locally compact groupoids and establish a universal property for representations of their full section C*-algebras on Hilbert modules over arbitrary C*-algebras. Based on this, we prove that the full section C*-algebra is functorial and exact, and we define a quasi-orbit space and a quasi-orbit map. We deduce and extend Renault's Integration and Disintegration Theorems to general Fell bundles using our universal property.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper defines possibly unsaturated upper semicontinuous Fell bundles over Hausdorff locally compact groupoids and establishes a universal property for representations of their full section C*-algebras on Hilbert modules over arbitrary C*-algebras (Theorem 3.5). Using this property, it proves functoriality and exactness of the full section C*-algebra, introduces a quasi-orbit space and quasi-orbit map, and extends Renault's Integration and Disintegration Theorems to general Fell bundles in §§4–6.

Significance. If the universal property holds as stated, the result supplies a flexible foundational tool for representations of groupoid C*-algebras via Fell bundles, extending prior work to the unsaturated setting and enabling direct proofs of functoriality, exactness, and the Renault theorems without additional topological restrictions. The explicit construction on Hilbert modules over arbitrary C*-algebras and the parameter-free character of the universal mapping property are notable strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3, Theorem 3.5] §3, Theorem 3.5: the verification that the constructed representation satisfies the universal mapping property for unsaturated bundles relies on the upper semicontinuity of the bundle; an explicit check that the covariance condition extends without saturation (e.g., via the definition of the section algebra in §2) would strengthen the argument, as the current sketch leaves the non-saturated continuity step implicit.
  2. [§5] §5, the quasi-orbit space construction: the map from the groupoid to the quasi-orbit space is asserted to be continuous and open, but the proof sketch does not address whether local compactness of the groupoid is used to guarantee that the quotient topology is Hausdorff; this is load-bearing for the subsequent disintegration theorem.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] §2: the notation for the full section C*-algebra (denoted C*(B) or similar) should be fixed consistently throughout; occasional use of different symbols for the same object appears in the functoriality statements.
  2. References: the citation to Renault's original theorems should include the precise statement being extended (e.g., Theorem X.Y in Renault's book) to make the comparison explicit.
  3. Figure 1 (if present): the diagram illustrating the quasi-orbit map would benefit from labeling the fibers to clarify the relation to the bundle sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3, Theorem 3.5] §3, Theorem 3.5: the verification that the constructed representation satisfies the universal mapping property for unsaturated bundles relies on the upper semicontinuity of the bundle; an explicit check that the covariance condition extends without saturation (e.g., via the definition of the section algebra in §2) would strengthen the argument, as the current sketch leaves the non-saturated continuity step implicit.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification would improve clarity. In the revised version we will expand the proof of Theorem 3.5 to include a direct check that the covariance condition holds for the non-saturated case, using only the definition of the section algebra given in §2 and the upper semicontinuity of the bundle. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5, the quasi-orbit space construction: the map from the groupoid to the quasi-orbit space is asserted to be continuous and open, but the proof sketch does not address whether local compactness of the groupoid is used to guarantee that the quotient topology is Hausdorff; this is load-bearing for the subsequent disintegration theorem.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current sketch is brief on this point. Local compactness and Hausdorffness of the groupoid do ensure the quotient is Hausdorff, which in turn guarantees that the quasi-orbit map is continuous and open. In the revision we will add an explicit remark or short lemma in §5 verifying the Hausdorff property of the quotient topology and its dependence on local compactness, thereby supporting the subsequent disintegration theorem. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained from definitions and universal property

full rationale

The paper first defines possibly unsaturated upper semicontinuous Fell bundles over Hausdorff locally compact groupoids in §2, then states the universal property for representations of the full section C*-algebra in Theorem 3.5. All subsequent claims (functoriality and exactness of the C*-algebra, definition of quasi-orbit space and map, and extensions of Renault's Integration and Disintegration Theorems) are derived in §§4–6 by explicit construction of representations on Hilbert modules and direct verification of the universal mapping property from covariance and continuity conditions. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a prior input, fitted parameter, or self-citation chain; the central results follow from the newly introduced objects and property without presupposing the conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard domain assumptions about the topological setting and continuity of the bundles; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Groupoids are Hausdorff and locally compact
    Explicitly stated as the setting in which the Fell bundles are defined.
  • domain assumption Fell bundles are upper semicontinuous and possibly unsaturated
    The universal property and all subsequent results are formulated for this class of bundles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5371 in / 1354 out tokens · 38597 ms · 2026-05-10T20:13:08.641354+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rapid decay and localizability for Fell bundles over etale Groupoids

    math.OA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Rapid decay for Fell bundles over étale groupoids gives analytic control and localizability in reduced cross-sectional C*-algebras, holds for polynomial-growth groupoids, equates to the group case for partial actions,...

  2. Categorical Symmetries via Operator Algebras

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The symmetry category of a 2D QFT with G-symmetry and anomaly k equals the twisted Hilbert space category Hilb^k(G), whose Drinfeld center is the twisted representation category of the conjugation groupoid C*-algebra,...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Ann.279(1987), no

    Claire Anantharaman-Delaroche,Systèmes dynamiques non commutatifs et moyennabilité, Math. Ann.279(1987), no. 2, 297–315, DOI 10.1007/BF01461725. MR 919508

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01461725 1987

  2. [2]

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal- 02429386

    ,Partial actions of groupoids(2020), preprint. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal- 02429386

    2020

  3. [3]

    Dirceu Bagio,Partial actions of inductive groupoids on rings, Int. J. Math. Game Theory Algebra20(2011), no. 3, 247–261. MR 2987830

    2011

  4. [4]

    and Fitzgerald Tokoly, L

    Dirceu Bagio and Antonio Paques,Partial groupoid actions: globalization, Morita theory, and Galois theory, Comm. Algebra40(2012), no. 10, 3658–3678, DOI 10.1080/00927872.2011.592889. MR 2982887

    work page doi:10.1080/00927872.2011.592889 2012

  5. [5]

    Algebra Appl.15(2016), no

    Dirceu Bagio and Hector Pinedo,Globalization of partial actions of groupoids on nonunital rings, J. Algebra Appl.15(2016), no. 5, 1650096, 16, DOI 10.1142/S0219498816500961. MR 3479455

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219498816500961 2016

  6. [6]

    Busby and Harvey A

    Robert C. Busby and Harvey A. Smith,Representations of twisted group algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.149(1970), 503–537, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9947-1970-0264418-8.MR 0264418

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-1970-0264418-8.mr 1970

  7. [7]

    Alcides Buss and Ruy Exel,Twisted actions and regular Fell bundles over inverse semigroups, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)103(2011), no. 2, 235–270, DOI 10.1112/plms/pdr006. MR 2821242 94 ALCIDES BUSS, ROHIT HOLKAR, AND RALF MEYER

    work page doi:10.1112/plms/pdr006 2011

  8. [8]

    Operator Theory 67(2012), no

    ,Fell bundles over inverse semigroups and twisted étale groupoids, J. Operator Theory 67(2012), no. 1, 153–205, available athttp://www.theta.ro/jot/archive/2012-067-001/ 2012-067-001-007.html. MR 2881538

    2012

  9. [9]

    Alcides Buss, Rohit Holkar, and Ralf Meyer,A universal property for groupoid C∗-algebras. I, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)117(2018), no. 2, 345–375, DOI 10.1112/plms.12131.MR 3851326

    work page doi:10.1112/plms.12131.mr 2018

  10. [10]

    Math.47(2017), no

    Alcides Buss and Ralf Meyer,Inverse semigroup actions on groupoids, Rocky Mountain J. Math.47(2017), no. 1, 53–159, DOI 10.1216/RMJ-2017-47-1-53. MR 3619758

    work page doi:10.1216/rmj-2017-47-1-53 2017

  11. [11]

    Noncommut

    ,Crossed products for actions of crossed modules onC∗-algebras, J. Noncommut. Geom.11(2017), 1195–1235, DOI 10.4171/JNCG/11-3-12. MR 3713016

    work page doi:10.4171/jncg/11-3-12 2017

  12. [12]

    arXiv:1604.02015

    ,Iterated crossed products for groupoid fibrations(2016), eprint. arXiv:1604.02015

    work page arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Ann.352(2012), no

    Alcides Buss, Ralf Meyer, and Chenchang Zhu,Non-Hausdorff symmetries ofC∗-algebras, Math. Ann.352(2012), no. 1, 73–97, DOI 10.1007/s00208-010-0630-3. MR 2885576

    work page doi:10.1007/s00208-010-0630-3 2012

  14. [14]

    ,A higher category approach to twisted actions onC∗-algebras, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2)56(2013), no. 2, 387–426, DOI 10.1017/S0013091512000259. MR 3056650

    work page doi:10.1017/s0013091512000259 2013

  15. [15]

    Davidson,C∗-algebras by example, Fields Institute Monographs, vol

    Kenneth R. Davidson,C∗-algebras by example, Fields Institute Monographs, vol. 6, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1996. MR 1402012

    1996

  16. [16]

    Cahiers Scien- tifiques, Fasc

    Jacques Dixmier,Les C∗-algèbres et leurs représentations, Deuxième édition. Cahiers Scien- tifiques, Fasc. XXIX, Gauthier-Villars Éditeur, Paris, 1969. MR 0246136

    1969

  17. [17]

    Translated from the French by Francis Jellett; North-Holland Mathematical Library, Vol

    , C∗-Algebras, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1977. Translated from the French by Francis Jellett; North-Holland Mathematical Library, Vol. 15. MR 0458185

    1977

  18. [18]

    27, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, New York, 1981

    ,von Neumann algebras, North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 27, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, New York, 1981. MR 641217

    1981

  19. [19]

    MR 1451139

    ,Les algèbres d’opérateurs dans l’espace hilbertien (algèbres de von Neumann), 2nd ed., Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1969. MR 1451139

    1969

  20. [20]

    Doran and James M

    Robert S. Doran and James M. G. Fell,Representations of∗-algebras, locally compact groups, and Banach ∗-algebraic bundles. Vol. 1, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 125, Academic Press Inc., Boston, MA, 1988. MR 936628

    1988

  21. [21]

    ,Representations of ∗-algebras, locally compact groups, and Banach∗-algebraic bundles. Vol. 2, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 126, Academic Press Inc., Boston, MA, 1988. MR 936629

    1988

  22. [22]

    Effros and Frank Hahn,Locally compact transformation groups andC∗-algebras, Bull

    Edward G. Effros and Frank Hahn,Locally compact transformation groups andC∗-algebras, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.73(1967), 222–226, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11690-2. MR 0233213

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1967-11690-2 1967

  23. [23]

    Ruy Exel,Twisted partial actions: a classification of regularC∗-algebraic bundles, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)74(1997), no. 2, 417–443, DOI 10.1112/S0024611597000154. MR 1425329

    work page doi:10.1112/s0024611597000154 1997

  24. [24]

    Math.17(2011), 331–382, available athttp://nyjm.albany.edu/j/2011/17-17.html

    ,Noncommutative Cartan subalgebras ofC∗-algebras, New York J. Math.17(2011), 331–382, available athttp://nyjm.albany.edu/j/2011/17-17.html. MR 2811068

    2011

  25. [25]

    224, Amer

    ,Partial dynamical systems, Fell bundles and applications, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 224, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2017., DOI 10.1090/surv/224 MR 3699795

    work page doi:10.1090/surv/224 2017

  26. [26]

    Ruy Exel and Marcelo Laca,Continuous Fell bundles associated to measurable twisted actions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.125(1997), no. 3, 795–799, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-97-03618-6.MR 1353382

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-97-03618-6.mr 1997

  27. [27]

    Herbert Federer and Anthony Perry Morse,Some properties of measurable functions, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.49(1943), 270–277, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9904-1943-07896-2. MR 0007916

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1943-07896-2 1943

  28. [28]

    J. M. G. Fell,Induced representations and Banach∗-algebraic bundles, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 582, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1977. With an appendix due to A. Douady and L. Dal Soglio-Hérault. MR 0457620

    1977

  29. [29]

    I,K-Theory16(1999), no

    Pierre-Yves Le Gall,Théorie de Kasparov équivariante et groupoïdes. I,K-Theory16(1999), no. 4, 361–390, DOI 10.1023/A:1007707525423. MR 1686846

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1007707525423 1999

  30. [30]

    Gootman and Aldo J

    Elliot C. Gootman and Aldo J. Lazar,Applications of noncommutative duality to crossed product C∗-algebras determined by an action or coaction, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)59 (1989), no. 3, 593–624, DOI 10.1112/plms/s3-59.3.593. MR 1014872

    work page doi:10.1112/plms/s3-59.3.593 1989

  31. [31]

    Gootman and Jonathan Rosenberg,The structure of crossed productC∗-algebras: a proof of the generalized Effros–Hahn conjecture, Invent

    Elliot C. Gootman and Jonathan Rosenberg,The structure of crossed productC∗-algebras: a proof of the generalized Effros–Hahn conjecture, Invent. Math.52(1979), no. 3, 283–298, DOI 10.1007/BF01389885. MR 537063

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01389885 1979

  32. [32]

    3-4, 191–250, DOI 10.1007/BF02392308

    Philip Green,The local structure of twisted covariance algebras, Acta Math.140(1978), no. 3-4, 191–250, DOI 10.1007/BF02392308. MR 0493349

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02392308 1978

  33. [33]

    Williams,Remarks on the ideal structure of Fell bundle C∗-algebras, Houston J

    Marius Ionescu and Dana P. Williams,Remarks on the ideal structure of Fell bundle C∗-algebras, Houston J. Math.38(2012), no. 4, 1241–1260, available athttp://www.math. uh.edu/~hjm/restricted/pdf38(4)/13ionescu.pdf. MR 3019033

    2012

  34. [34]

    Niles Johnson and Donald Yau,2-Dimensional categories, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2021., DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198871378.001.0001 MR 4261588 A UNIVERSAL PROPERTY FOR GROUPOID C*-ALGEBRAS. II. FELL BUNDLES 95

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871378.001.0001 2021

  35. [35]

    Kaliszewski, John Quigg, and Dana P

    S. Kaliszewski, John Quigg, and Dana P. Williams,The Rieffel correspondence for equivalent Fell bundles, J. Aust. Math. Soc.117(2024), no. 3, 288–307, DOI 10.1017/S144678872300037X. MR 4832964

    work page doi:10.1017/s144678872300037x 2024

  36. [36]

    Alexander Kumjian,On C∗-diagonals, Canad. J. Math.38(1986), no. 4, 969–1008, DOI 10.4153/CJM-1986-048-0. MR 854149

    work page doi:10.4153/cjm-1986-048-0 1986

  37. [37]

    Alex Kumjian,Fell bundles over groupoids, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.126(1998), no. 4, 1115–1125, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-98-04240-3. MR 1443836

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-98-04240-3 1998

  38. [38]

    3, 257–303, DOI 10.4064/sm8762-5-2017

    Bartosz Kosma Kwaśniewski and Ralf Meyer,Aperiodicity, topological freeness and pure outerness: from group actions to Fell bundles, Studia Math.241(2018), no. 3, 257–303, DOI 10.4064/sm8762-5-2017. MR 3756105

    work page doi:10.4064/sm8762-5-2017 2018

  39. [39]

    ,Stone duality and quasi-orbit spaces for generalisedC∗-inclusions, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)121(2020), no. 4, 788–827, DOI 10.1112/plms.12332. MR 4105787

    work page doi:10.1112/plms.12332 2020

  40. [40]

    Math.26(2021), 271–335, DOI 10.4171/DM/815

    ,Essential crossed products by inverse semigroup actions: Simplicity and pure infinite- ness, Doc. Math.26(2021), 271–335, DOI 10.4171/DM/815. MR 4246403

    work page doi:10.4171/dm/815 2021

  41. [41]

    Christopher Lance,Hilbert C∗-modules, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol

    E. Christopher Lance,Hilbert C∗-modules, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 210, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995., DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511526206 MR 1325694

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511526206 1995

  42. [42]

    Kevin McClanahan, K-theory for partial crossed products by discrete groups, J. Funct. Anal. 130(1995), no. 1, 77–117, DOI 10.1006/jfan.1995.1064. MR 1331978

    work page doi:10.1006/jfan.1995.1064 1995

  43. [43]

    arXiv:1101.1235v1

    El-kaïoum Moutuou and Jean-Louis Tu,Equivalence of Fell systems and their reduced C∗-algebras(2011), preprint. arXiv:1101.1235v1

    work page arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    Muhly, Jean N

    Paul S. Muhly, Jean N. Renault, and Dana P. Williams,Equivalence and isomorphism for groupoid C∗-algebras, J. Operator Theory17(1987), no. 1, 3–22, available at http: //www.theta.ro/jot/archive/1987-017-001/1987-017-001-001.html. MR 873460

    1987

  45. [45]

    Muhly and Dana P

    Paul S. Muhly and Dana P. Williams,Equivalence and disintegration theorems for Fell bundles and their C∗-algebras, Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.)456(2008), 1–57, DOI 10.4064/dm456-0-1. MR 2446021

    work page doi:10.4064/dm456-0-1 2008

  46. [46]

    May Nilsen,C∗-bundles and C0(X)-algebras, Indiana Univ. Math. J.45(1996), no. 2, 463–477, DOI 10.1512/iumj.1996.45.1086. MR 1414338

    work page doi:10.1512/iumj.1996.45.1086 1996

  47. [47]

    Pedersen,Extensions of C∗-algebras, Operator algebras and quantum field theory (Rome, 1996), Int

    Gert K. Pedersen,Extensions of C∗-algebras, Operator algebras and quantum field theory (Rome, 1996), Int. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 1–35. MR 1491103

    1996

  48. [48]

    MR 0281876

    Arlan Ramsay,Virtual groups and group actions, Advances in Math.6(1971), 253–322, DOI 10.1016/0001-8708(71)90018-1. MR 0281876

    work page doi:10.1016/0001-8708(71)90018-1 1971

  49. [49]

    ,Topologies on measured groupoids, J. Funct. Anal.47(1982), no. 3, 314–343, DOI 10.1016/0022-1236(82)90110-0. MR 665021

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-1236(82)90110-0 1982

  50. [50]

    793, Springer, Berlin, 1980., DOI 10.1007/BFb0091072 MR 584266

    Jean Renault,A groupoid approach toC∗-algebras, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 793, Springer, Berlin, 1980., DOI 10.1007/BFb0091072 MR 584266

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0091072 1980

  51. [51]

    Operator The- ory18(1987), no

    ,Représentation des produits croisés d’algèbres de groupoïdes, J. Operator The- ory18(1987), no. 1, 67–97, available athttp://www.theta.ro/jot/archive/1987-018-001/ 1987-018-001-005.html. MR 912813

    1987

  52. [52]

    Operator The- ory25(1991), no

    ,The ideal structure of groupoid crossed product C∗-algebras, J. Operator The- ory25(1991), no. 1, 3–36, available athttp://www.theta.ro/jot/archive/1991-025-001/ 1991-025-001-001.html. With an appendix by Georges Skandalis. MR 1191252

    1991

  53. [53]

    Williams,Renault’s equivalence theorem for reduced groupoid C∗-algebras, J

    Aidan Sims and Dana P. Williams,Renault’s equivalence theorem for reduced groupoid C∗-algebras, J. Operator Theory68(2012), no. 1, 223–239, available athttp://www.theta. ro/jot/archive/2012-068-001/2012-068-001-012.html. MR 2966043

    2012

  54. [54]

    Williams,Crossed products ofC∗-algebras, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol

    Dana P. Williams,Crossed products ofC∗-algebras, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 134, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007., DOI 10.1090/surv/134 MR 2288954

    work page doi:10.1090/surv/134 2007

  55. [55]

    199–204, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-0453-4

    Shigeru Yamagami,On primitive ideal spaces ofC∗-algebras over certain locally compact groupoids, Mappings of operator algebras (Philadelphia, PA, 1988), 1990, pp. 199–204, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-0453-4. MR 1103378 Email address:alcides.buss@ufsc.br Email address:rohit.d.holkar@gmail.com Departamento de Matemática, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 8...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0453-4 1988