Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Pickalo: Leveraging 6D Pose Estimation for Low-Cost Industrial Bin Picking

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A modular 6D-pose pipeline on consumer RGB-D hardware can empty densely packed industrial euroboxes of reflective metal parts at roughly 600 picks per hour with 96–99 % success.

desk verdict Solid systems paper: low-cost 6D pipeline hits ~600 MPPH / 96–99% SR on dense metallic euroboxes; novelty is integration, evidence is real hardware. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.04690 v2 pith:IG54WQMX submitted 2026-04-06 cs.RO cs.AI

Alessandro Tarsi , Matteo Mastrogiuseppe , Saverio Taliani , Simone Cortinovis , Ugo Pattacini This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords binpicking6Dposeestimationfoundationmodelsdepthenhancementbufferindustrialroboticslow-costRGB-Dsynthetictraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Industrial bin picking of shiny, heavily occluded metal parts has long required expensive high-end 3D sensors. Pickalo shows that the same job can be done with a wrist-mounted consumer stereo camera, open foundation models, and careful multi-view fusion. Depth maps are refined by a deep stereo network, objects are segmented by a Mask-RCNN trained only on synthetic images and localized by a zero-shot 6D pose estimator, and a temporal pose buffer stitches consistent, symmetry-aware estimates across viewpoints. Offline antipodal grasp libraries are ranked online by a simple utility score and checked for collisions, then executed open-loop with proprioceptive verification. On a standard six-axis arm the system sustains nearly 600 mean picks per hour and near-perfect success for half-hour runs that almost empty full euroboxes, proving that cost no longer has to be the barrier to reliable factory bin picking.

What carries the argument

The Pose Buffer: a temporal multi-view fusion module that associates new pose estimates with existing object tracks by Euclidean and angular thresholds, averages them while explicitly accounting for object symmetries, and exposes only poses confirmed in the latest view and observed at least twice, thereby suppressing noise and inconsistent detections under severe occlusion.

What would settle it

Replace the three tested part families with a new set of reflective industrial components never seen by the synthetic training pipeline; if, with BridgeDepth and the pose buffer still active, the 30-minute emptying trial yields success rate below ~90 % or mean picks per hour collapses well below 500, the central performance claim does not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A complete 6D-pose-based bin-picking system built entirely from low-cost hardware and modular open components—BridgeDepth-enhanced stereo, synthetic-trained instance segmentation, zero-shot SAM-6D localization, multi-view pose buffering, and utility-ranked antipodal grasps—delivers 96–99 % grasp success and up to 600 mean picks per hour over continuous 30-minute operations on densely filled euroboxes of reflective industrial parts.

Load-bearing premise

That a Mask-RCNN trained solely on photorealistic synthetic images plus a zero-shot 6D pose estimator will produce masks and poses accurate enough for novel shiny metal parts under real factory lighting, reflections and heavy occlusion without any real-image fine-tuning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Factories can reach industrial throughput without purchasing structured-light or high-end stereo cameras.
  • Switching to a new part geometry requires only CAD-driven synthetic data generation and offline grasp sampling, not re-training of the pose estimator.
  • Explicit 6D poses enable oriented placement or quality-inspection steps that pure grasp-detection methods cannot support.
  • Long-horizon stability comes from multi-view pose fusion and refined depth rather than continuous visual servoing, simplifying real-time control.
  • The modular design lets individual blocks (depth, segmentation, planner) be swapped as better foundation models appear without redesigning the whole cell.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same perception stack could be dropped onto mobile bases or dual-arm cells by exchanging only the motion-planning layer.
  • Success on three distinct metallic families implies the synthetic-to-real gap for textureless industrial parts is already small enough to justify broader zero-shot trials across entire part catalogues.
  • Open-loop execution plus simple finger-encoder checks may scale to still higher cycle rates once gripper force sensing is added for earlier slip detection.
  • If deep stereo matching continues to improve, multi-view depth voting schemes become unnecessary for most reflective bin-picking scenes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. Pickalo is a modular industrial bin-picking pipeline that estimates 6D object poses from a wrist-mounted consumer RGB-D camera (RealSense D435i) and plans antipodal grasps for a parallel-jaw gripper on a UR5e. Raw stereo is refined by BridgeDepth; instances are segmented by a Mask-RCNN trained only on BlenderProc synthetic data and localized by zero-shot SAM-6D; a Pose Buffer fuses multi-view estimates with symmetry handling and a depth-consistency rejection filter; offline antipodal candidates are ranked online by a four-term utility and checked for collisions against a scene model of target meshes, static geometry, and free-space voxels. On densely filled euroboxes of three metallic part families the system reports up to ~600 MPPH with 96–99 % grasp success over continuous 30-minute runs, with ablations isolating BridgeDepth and the Pose Buffer.

Significance. If the reported numbers hold under the stated conditions, the work shows that industrially relevant throughput and reliability for dense metallic bin picking can be obtained without high-end structured-light sensors, by integrating recent foundation models for depth and zero-shot pose with careful multi-view fusion and offline grasp curation. The physical multi-duration runs, emptying study (Fig. 9), and ablations (Tables II–III) supply concrete evidence that is still scarce for low-cost setups. The modular open-source-oriented design and the explicit Pose Buffer / rejection-filter components are reusable engineering contributions. The pure-synthetic segmentation + zero-shot pose path is a practical strength for new part families, provided its generalization limits are clearly scoped.

major comments (2)
  1. Section III-C and the experimental setup: the central claim of low-cost industrial readiness rests on a Mask-RCNN trained purely on BlenderProc synthetic data plus zero-shot SAM-6D generalizing to novel metallic parts under real factory lighting, reflections and severe occlusion. Only three part families are evaluated; no quantitative domain-gap metrics (e.g., mask IoU or ADD-S on held-out real images) or real-image fine-tuning baseline are reported. This is a load-bearing scope limitation rather than an internal contradiction, but it should be stated more explicitly as a boundary of the claim and, if possible, quantified with a small real-image validation set.
  2. Section III-F (utility score S(g) and the top-18 % ranking cutoff) and the free parameters listed in the pipeline (association thresholds θ_thresh, δ_thresh, gripper empty/slip ε): these engineering choices are validated post-hoc by the reported runs, yet no sensitivity analysis is provided. Because cycle time and Early Exit Rate depend directly on the cutoff and the association rules, a short sensitivity table (or statement that performance is stable across a stated range) would strengthen the reproducibility of the 600 MPPH / 96–99 % SR claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. Figure 3 caption and surrounding text: the qualitative BridgeDepth vs. RealSense comparison is useful; adding a quantitative depth metric (e.g., hole rate or RMSE on a known plane) would make the ablation in Table II easier to interpret.
  2. Equation (2) and the Pose Rejection Filter: the inequality is clear, but a short note on how often the filter fires (percentage of rejected candidates) would help readers judge its practical impact.
  3. Table I vs. Tables II–III: Object A/B/C results are given for 1 000 iterations, while the ablations use timed runs on Object B only; a one-sentence clarification that the 1 000-iteration numbers already include multi-view Pose Buffer operation would avoid ambiguity.
  4. Related Work: a brief comparison of cycle-time / MPPH numbers against the closest low-cost baselines (e.g., Sun et al., AnyGrasp industrial settings) would better situate the 600 MPPH claim.
  5. Minor typographical issues: “photo-synthetic” → “photorealistic synthetic”; consistent capitalization of “Pose Buffer” / “pose buffer”; ensure all arXiv-style citations have page or venue details where available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: empirical systems paper whose performance claims are measured on physical hardware runs, not derived from fitted parameters or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

Pickalo is a modular engineering pipeline paper. Its central claims (up to ~600 MPPH, 96–99% grasp success over 30-minute runs on dense metallic euroboxes with low-cost RealSense + UR5e) are obtained by direct physical execution and counting of successful picks, not by algebraic derivation from inputs. Ablations (Tables II–III) compare real sensor streams with/without BridgeDepth and with/without the Pose Buffer on the same hardware; the differences are measured, not forced by construction. The utility score S(g) (Eq. 6) and the 18% ranking cutoff are explicit engineering heuristics whose weights and threshold are chosen and then validated post-hoc by the observation that a feasible grasp appears in the top 18% in 99% of cases; they are never presented as first-principles predictions of the success rates. Instance segmentation is trained on synthetic BlenderProc data and applied zero-shot (via SAM-6D) to real scenes; this is a standard sim-to-real transfer, not a circular fit-to-predict loop. No uniqueness theorems, self-citation load-bearing premises, or renamed known results appear. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external physical benchmarks and contains no circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central performance claim rests on standard robotics assumptions (rigid objects, known CAD, calibrated camera-robot transform, open-loop trajectory tracking) plus a small set of engineering thresholds and the domain assumption that synthetic-only training plus zero-shot pose estimation transfers to real metallic clutter. No new physical entities are postulated; free parameters are the usual ranking weights and association thresholds chosen for the pipeline.

free parameters (4)
  • utility score weights w1–w4
    Weighted sum of alignment, yaw, confidence and height terms used to rank grasps; exact numerical values not reported, chosen to prioritize vertical top-of-pile grasps.
  • pose association thresholds θ_thresh, δ_thresh
    Angular and translational cut-offs that decide whether a new pose estimate belongs to an existing object in the Pose Buffer (Eq. 3).
  • top-18% grasp ranking cutoff
    Only the top 18% of ranked grasp candidates are collision-checked; justified by the empirical observation that a valid solution lies in that prefix 99% of the time.
  • gripper empty/slip thresholds ε = 0.1 mm and velocity ε
    Proprioceptive checks that declare grasp failure if fingers close fully or continue moving under load.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Rigid-body objects with known CAD models and known discrete symmetry groups S(l)
    Required for offline antipodal sampling, mesh collision checks, and symmetry-aware pose association (Sections III-D, III-F).
  • domain assumption Photorealistic synthetic data generated by BlenderProc is distributionally close enough to real metallic industrial scenes for Mask-RCNN to transfer without real images
    Stated in Section III-C; the entire instance-segmentation stage rests on this sim-to-real transfer.
  • domain assumption Open-loop execution of a collision-checked trajectory is sufficiently accurate given the fidelity of the 6D pose estimate
    Explicit design choice in Section III-G to meet cycle-time constraints; success verification is only proprioceptive after the fact.
  • domain assumption BridgeDepth produces depth maps accurate enough for both pose estimation and voxel-based collision reasoning on reflective metal
    Core premise of the depth-enhancement block; supported by the ablation in Table II but still an external model assumption.
invented entities (2)
  • Pose Buffer (temporal multi-view fusion with symmetry handling and validation rules)
    purpose: Fuse noisy single-view pose estimates into a consistent scene state, reject outliers, and expose only multi-observed objects for grasping.
    Described in Section III-D; builds on CosyPose-style ideas but is a concrete module with specific association, averaging, and invalidation rules introduced for this pipeline. Independent evidence is limited to the ablations in the same paper.
  • Pose Rejection Filter (depth-consistency check on bounding-box center vs. estimated object center)
    purpose: Discard pose hypotheses that place the object closer to the camera than the observed depth of its mask, a common failure under heavy occlusion.
    Introduced in Section III-C (Eqs. 1–2) as a simple geometric filter; no external validation outside this work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pickalo: Leveraging 6D Pose Estimation for Low-Cost Industrial Bin Picking." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IG54WQMX

@misc{pith2026260404690,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pickalo: Leveraging 6D Pose Estimation for Low-Cost Industrial Bin Picking},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IG54WQMX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.04690}
}
read the original abstract

Bin picking in real industrial environments remains challenging due to severe clutter, occlusions, and the high cost of traditional 3D sensing setups. We present Pickalo, a modular 6D pose-based bin-picking pipeline built entirely on low-cost hardware. A wrist-mounted RGB-D camera actively explores the scene from multiple viewpoints, while raw stereo streams are processed with BridgeDepth to obtain refined depth maps suitable for accurate collision reasoning. Object instances are segmented with a Mask-RCNN model trained purely on photorealistic synthetic data and localized using the zero-shot SAM-6D pose estimator. A pose buffer module fuses multi-view observations over time, handling object symmetries and significantly reducing pose noise. Offline, we generate and curate large sets of antipodal grasp candidates per object; online, a utility-based ranking and fast collision checking are queried for the grasp planning. Deployed on a UR5e with a parallel-jaw gripper and an Intel RealSense D435i, Pickalo achieves up to 600 mean picks per hour with 96-99% grasp success and robust performance over 30-minute runs on densely filled euroboxes. Ablation studies demonstrate the benefits of enhanced depth estimation and of the pose buffer for long-term stability and throughput in realistic industrial conditions. Videos are available at https://mesh-iit.github.io/project-jl2-camozzi/

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04690 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The experimental setup consists of a UR5e manipulator with a consumer-grade camera attached to the wrist. The bin is a standard eurobox heavily filled with small metallic objects. align object models with observations, even under partial occlusion. However, these solutions require a complex and expensive setup, posing a barrier to user adoption. More recently, research has shifted toward learning-based approaches th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the presented pipeline. A stereo-pair image is acquired and processed by the depth estimation block to obtain an enhanced depth reconstruction. The resulting depth is aligned to the left RGB frame and provided to the 6D Pose Estimation model, together with the object model CAD. The scene state is reconstructed by combining pose estimates across multiple views, occupied voxels, and static objects. An exam… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. RealSense on the left. BridgeDepth on the right. B. Depth Map Acquisition Standard active IR stereo sensors often produce noisy depth maps, especially in the presence of metallic objects [27]. To address this problem, we adopted BridgeDepth, a lightweight deep stereo matching framework that merges the advantages of stereo matching with the context understanding of monocular depth estimation [15]. The use of BridgeDe… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The sorted grasp poses are checked following the ranking order until a feasible grasp pose is found. Grasp poses leading to a collision are discarded. • Pose Confidence (Sconf ): A normalized score derived from the Pose Buffer, prioritizing objects detected with higher…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Test objects used in the evaluation: (A) Square, (B) Cylin￾drical, and (C) Complex geometry. B. Grasp Pipeline Performance To quantitatively evaluate the system’s operational effi￾ciency and grasp reliability, we adopted the following set of performance metrics: • Mean…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The grasping pipeline is parallelized to elaborate the percep￾tion and planning blocks for the current iteration, while the robot executes the grasping and releasing trajectories computed at the previous iteration. IV. EXPERIMENTS A. Experimental Setup The experimental…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Object pose estimation error distribution on XYZ-IBD dataset, enabling and disabling the pose buffer module. Next, we compared the full pipeline performance using Object B over three time intervals (5, 10, and 30 minutes). The results, shown in Table III, highlight the…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    6d pose estimation of textureless shiny objects using random ferns for bin-picking

    Jos ´e Jeronimo Rodrigues, Jun-Sik Kim, Makoto Furukawa, Jo ˜ao Xavier, Pedro Aguiar, and Takeo Kanade. 6d pose estimation of textureless shiny objects using random ferns for bin-picking. In2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 3334–3341, 2012

    2012

  2. [2]

    Model globally, match locally: Efficient and robust 3d object recognition

    Bertram Drost, Markus Ulrich, Nassir Navab, and Slobodan Ili ´c. Model globally, match locally: Efficient and robust 3d object recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 998–1005, 2010

    2010

  3. [3]

    Multimodal templates for real-time detection of texture-less objects in heavily cluttered scenes

    Stefan Hinterstoisser, Stefan Holzer, Cedric Cagniart, Slobodan Ilic, Kurt Konolige, Nassir Navab, and Vincent Lepetit. Multimodal templates for real-time detection of texture-less objects in heavily cluttered scenes. In2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 858–865, 2011

    2011

  4. [4]

    Cad-based recognition of 3d objects in monocular images

    Markus Ulrich, Christian Wiedemann, and Carsten Steger. Cad-based recognition of 3d objects in monocular images. In2009 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1191–1198, 2009. 9

    2009

  5. [5]

    Cad-based pose estimation for random bin-picking of multiple objects using a rgb-d camera

    Cheng-Hei Wu, Sin-Yi Jiang, and Kai-Tai Song. Cad-based pose estimation for random bin-picking of multiple objects using a rgb-d camera. In2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), pages 1645–1649, 2015

    2015

  6. [6]

    A novel robotic grasp detection framework using low-cost rgb-d camera for industrial bin picking.IEEE Trans

    Han Sun, Zhuangzhuang Zhang, Haili Wang, Yizhao Wang, and Qixin Cao. A novel robotic grasp detection framework using low-cost rgb-d camera for industrial bin picking.IEEE Trans. on Instrumentation and Measurement, 73:1–12, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Xungao Zhong, Tao Gong, Junzhi Yu, Jiaguo Luo, Chengxian Zhou, Xunyu Zhong, and Qiang Liu. Region-aware grasping for stacked work- pieces: A 6d-wise label self-generation method and robust evaluation strategy.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, PP:1–1, 01 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    Ang, and Gregory S

    Peiyuan Ni, Chee Meng Chew, Marcelo H. Ang, and Gregory S. Chirikjian. Reasoning and learning a perceptual metric for self-training of reflective objects in bin-picking with a low-cost camera.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 10(10):10458–10465, October 2025

    2025

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    Accurate and efficient zero-shot 6d pose estimation with frozen foundation models, 2025

    Andrea Caraffa, Davide Boscaini, and Fabio Poiesi. Accurate and efficient zero-shot 6d pose estimation with frozen foundation models, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Foundationpose: Unified 6d pose estimation and tracking of novel objects, 2024

    Bowen Wen, Wei Yang, Jan Kautz, and Stan Birchfield. Foundationpose: Unified 6d pose estimation and tracking of novel objects, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    SAM-6D: Segment anything model meets zero-shot 6d object pose estimation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15707, 2023

    Jiehong Lin, Lihua Liu, Dekun Lu, and Kui Jia. SAM-6D: Segment anything model meets zero-shot 6d object pose estimation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15707, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Waslander

    Jun Yang, Dong Li, and Steven L. Waslander. Probabilistic multi- view fusion of active stereo depth maps for robotic bin-picking.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(3):4472–4479, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Foundationstereo: Zero-shot stereo matching

    Bowen Wen, Matthew Trepte, Joseph Aribido, Jan Kautz, Orazio Gallo, and Stan Birchfield. Foundationstereo: Zero-shot stereo matching. CVPR, 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    DEFOM-Stereo: Depth Foundation Model Based Stereo Matching

    Hualie Jiang, Zhiqiang Lou, Laiyan Ding, Rui Xu, Minglang Tan, Wenjie Jiang, and Rui Huang. DEFOM-Stereo: Depth Foundation Model Based Stereo Matching . In2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 21857–21867, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, June...

    2025

  7. [15]

    BridgeDepth: Bridging monocular and stereo reasoning with latent alignment

    Tongfan Guan, Jiaxin Guo, Chen Wang, and Yun-Hui Liu. BridgeDepth: Bridging monocular and stereo reasoning with latent alignment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 27681–27691, 2025. Highlight paper

    2025

  8. [16]

    Deep learning based 6-dof antipodal grasp planning from point cloud in random bin- picking task using single-view

    Tat Hieu Bui, Yeong Gwang Son, Seung Jae Moon, Quang Huy Nguyen, Issac Rhee, Juyong Hong, and Hyouk Ryeol Choi. Deep learning based 6-dof antipodal grasp planning from point cloud in random bin- picking task using single-view. InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference...

    2024

  9. [17]

    AnyGrasp: Robust and efficient grasp perception in spatial and temporal domains.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2023

    Hao-Shu Fang, Chenxi Wang, Hongjie Fang, Minghao Gou, Jirong Liu, Hengxu Yan, Wenhai Liu, Yichen Xie, and Cewu Lu. AnyGrasp: Robust and efficient grasp perception in spatial and temporal domains.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    PoseCNN: A convolutional neural network for 6d object pose estimation in cluttered scenes

    Yu Xiang, Tanner Schmidt, Venkatraman Narayanan, and Dieter Fox. PoseCNN: A convolutional neural network for 6d object pose estimation in cluttered scenes. InProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    Sinha, and Pascal Fua

    Bugra Tekin, Sudipta N. Sinha, and Pascal Fua. Real-time seamless single shot 6d object pose prediction. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 292–301, 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    Megapose: 6d pose estimation of novel objects via render & compare, 2022

    Yann Labb ´e, Lucas Manuelli, Arsalan Mousavian, Stephen Tyree, Stan Birchfield, Jonathan Tremblay, Justin Carpentier, Mathieu Aubry, Dieter Fox, and Josef Sivic. Megapose: 6d pose estimation of novel objects via render & compare, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    A sim-to-real object recognition and localization framework for industrial robotic bin picking.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(2):3961–3968, 2022

    Xianzhi Li, Rui Cao, Yidan Feng, Kai Chen, Biqi Yang, Chi-Wing Fu, Yichuan Li, Qi Dou, Yun-Hui Liu, and Pheng-Ann Heng. A sim-to-real object recognition and localization framework for industrial robotic bin picking.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(2):3961–3968, 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Densefusion: 6d object pose estimation by iterative dense fusion

    Chen Wang, Danfei Xu, Yuke Zhu, Roberto Mart ´ın-Mart´ın, Cewu Lu, Li Fei-Fei, and Silvio Savarese. Densefusion: 6d object pose estimation by iterative dense fusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 3343–3352, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Waslander

    Jun Yang, Yizhou Gao, Dong Li, and Steven L. Waslander. Robi: A multi-view dataset for reflective objects in robotic bin-picking. In2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 9788–9795, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    A low-cost, high-speed, and robust bin picking system for factory automation enabled by a non-stop, multi-view, and active vision scheme

    Xingdou Fu, Lin Miao, Yasuhiro Ohnishi, Yuki Hasegawa, and Masaki Suwa. A low-cost, high-speed, and robust bin picking system for factory automation enabled by a non-stop, multi-view, and active vision scheme. InProceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intellige...

    2024

  17. [25]

    Cosy- Pose: Consistent multi-view multi-object 6d pose estimation

    Yann Labb ´e, Justin Carpentier, Mathieu Aubry, and Josef Sivic. Cosy- Pose: Consistent multi-view multi-object 6d pose estimation. InPro- ceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    Lessons and winning solutions in industrial object detection and pose estimation from the 2025 bin-picking perception challenge

    Ziqin Huang, Chengxi Li, Yingyue Li, Xingyu Liu, Chenyangguang Zhang, Ruida Zhang, Bowen Fu, Xinggang Hu, Yun Qu, Mengge Liu, Yixiu Mao, Wendong Huang, Gu Wang, and Xiangyang Ji. Lessons and winning solutions in industrial object detection and pose estimation from the 2025 bin...

    2025

  19. [27]

    A low-cost, high-speed, and robust bin picking system for factory automation enabled by a non-stop, multi-view, and active vision scheme

    Xingdou Fu, Lin Miao, Yasuhiro Ohnishi, Yuki Hasegawa, and Masaki Suwa. A low-cost, high-speed, and robust bin picking system for factory automation enabled by a non-stop, multi-view, and active vision scheme. In2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and ...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, Piotr Doll ´ar, and Ross Girshick

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C. Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, Piotr Doll ´ar, and Ross Girshick. Segment anything, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Strobl, Matthias Humt, and Rudolph Triebel

    Maximilian Denninger, Dominik Winkelbauer, Martin Sundermeyer, Wout Boerdijk, Markus Knauer, Klaus H. Strobl, Matthias Humt, and Rudolph Triebel. Blenderproc2: A procedural pipeline for photorealistic rendering.Journal of Open Source Software, 8(82):4901, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Mask r-cnn

    Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Doll ´ar, and Ross Girshick. Mask r-cnn. In2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 2980–2988, 2017

    2017

  23. [31]

    Averaging quaternions.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 30(4):1193–1197, 2007

    F Landis Markley, Yang Cheng, John L Crassidis, and Yaakov Oshman. Averaging quaternions.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 30(4):1193–1197, 2007

    2007

  24. [32]

    On object symmetries and 6d pose estimation from images

    Giorgia Pitteri, Micha ¨el Ramamonjisoa, Slobodan Ilic, and Vincent Lepetit. On object symmetries and 6d pose estimation from images. In2019 International conference on 3D vision (3DV), pages 614–622. IEEE, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Kilian Kleeberger, Florian Roth, Richard Bormann, and Marco F. Huber. Automatic grasp pose generation for parallel jaw grippers, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Xyz-ibd: A high-precision bin-picking dataset for object 6d pose estimation capturing real-world industrial complexity, 2025

    Junwen Huang, Jizhong Liang, Jiaqi Hu, Martin Sundermeyer, Peter KT Yu, Nassir Navab, and Benjamin Busam. Xyz-ibd: A high-precision bin-picking dataset for object 6d pose estimation capturing real-world industrial complexity, 2025. Alessandro Tarsireceived the B.S. and M.S. de...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.