pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04967 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-04 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.LG

Recognition: unknown

Belief Dynamics for Detecting Behavioral Shifts in Safe Collaborative Manipulation

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.RO cs.LG
keywords detectionstepsunderdynamicsmethodsua-tomacrossattention
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Robots operating in shared workspaces must maintain safe coordination with other agents whose behavior may change during task execution. When a collaborating agent switches strategy mid-episode, continuing under outdated assumptions can lead to unsafe actions and increased collision risk. Reliable detection of such behavioral regime changes is therefore critical. We study regime-switch detection under controlled non-stationarity in ManiSkill shared-workspace manipulation tasks. Across ten detection methods and five random seeds, enabling detection reduces post-switch collisions by 52%. However, average performance hides significant reliability differences: under a realistic tolerance of +-3 steps, detection ranges from 86% to 30%, while under +-5 steps all methods achieve 100%. We introduce UA-TOM, a lightweight belief-tracking module that augments frozen vision-language-action (VLA) control backbones using selective state-space dynamics, causal attention, and prediction-error signals. Across five seeds and 1200 episodes, UA-TOM achieves the highest detection rate among unassisted methods (85.7% at +-3) and the lowest close-range time (4.8 steps), outperforming an Oracle (5.3 steps). Analysis shows hidden-state update magnitude increases by 17x at regime switches and decays over roughly 10 timesteps, while the discretization step converges to a near-constant value (Delta_t approx 0.78), indicating sensitivity driven by learned dynamics rather than input-dependent gating. Cross-domain experiments in Overcooked show complementary roles of causal attention and prediction-error signals. UA-TOM introduces 7.4 ms inference overhead (14.8% of a 50 ms control budget), enabling reliable regime-switch detection without modifying the base policy.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. VLM Judges Can Rank but Cannot Score: Task-Dependent Uncertainty in Multimodal Evaluation

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VLM judges exhibit task-dependent uncertainty in their scores, with conformal prediction revealing wide intervals for complex tasks and a decoupling between good ranking performance and poor absolute scoring reliability.