pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05024 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Winding Back the Clock: Recent Star Formation Histories of Massive Quiescent Galaxies Are Consistent With Their Rapid Number Density Evolution Since zsim7

Yunchong Zhang , Zhiyuan Ji , Rachel Bezanson , Christina C. Williams , Gabriel Brammer , Aidan P. Cloonan , Anna de Graaff , Jenny E. Greene , Michaela Hirschmann , Christian Kragh Jespersen , Gourav Khullar , Claudia del P. Lagos , Joel Leja , Michael V. Maseda , Ian McConachie , Pascal A. Oesch , Sedona H. Price , David J. Setton , Katherine A. Suess , Katherine E. Whitaker

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords quiescent galaxiesstar formation historiesnumber density evolutionJWST observationshigh-redshift galaxiesgalaxy quenchingstellar population modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Star formation histories of z=2-5 quiescent galaxies reconstruct number densities that match observations to z~7.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Massive quiescent galaxies show up in far higher numbers at z>4 than most models predict, based on early JWST detections. This work checks whether the recent star-formation histories of similar galaxies observed at 2

Core claim

We infer star-formation histories for massive quiescent galaxies at 2<z<5 from JWST NIRCam photometry and NIRSpec spectra using Bayesian spectro-photometric fitting with Prospector. For each galaxy we determine the timescale on which it would have been classified as quiescent, then use that information to reconstruct the number density of the quiescent population at earlier epochs. These backtracked densities agree with existing observational constraints out to z~7, including new constraints from the PANORAMIC survey, lending support to the stellar population modeling while preserving the tension with theoretical predictions.

What carries the argument

The recent quiescent timescale for each galaxy, derived from its star-formation history inferred via Bayesian Prospector modeling of JWST photometry and spectra, then used to backtrack the population's number density.

If this is right

  • The number density of massive quiescent galaxies evolves consistently from z~7 down to z~2 when traced through their star-formation histories.
  • Stellar population synthesis modeling of high-redshift quiescent galaxies yields credible recent quenching timescales.
  • The excess of observed quiescent galaxies relative to model predictions at 3<z<7 is reinforced rather than resolved.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result implies that whatever quenches star formation in massive galaxies must already operate efficiently by z~7.
  • The same backtracking method could be applied to other galaxy populations or to lower-mass systems to test evolutionary consistency across the galaxy mass function.
  • If the agreement holds in larger samples, it would tighten constraints on the physical mechanisms that shut off star formation in the early universe.

Load-bearing premise

That the Prospector fits correctly recover the recent quenching timescales for these galaxies and that the 2<z<5 sample is representative of the progenitors of the higher-redshift population.

What would settle it

A future wide-field survey measuring quiescent-galaxy number densities at z~6-7 that are substantially lower than the values reconstructed from the 2<z<5 star-formation histories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05024 by Aidan P. Cloonan, Anna de Graaff, Christian Kragh Jespersen, Christina C. Williams, Claudia del P. Lagos, David J. Setton, Gabriel Brammer, Gourav Khullar, Ian McConachie, Jenny E. Greene, Joel Leja, Katherine A. Suess, Katherine E. Whitaker, Michaela Hirschmann, Michael V. Maseda, Pascal A. Oesch, Rachel Bezanson, Sedona H. Price, Yunchong Zhang, Zhiyuan Ji.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top panels: The spectro-photometric fits of an example quiescent galaxy (RUBIES-UDS-175698) at z ∼ 3.1, given three prospector setups. The fiducial model (red) adopts the MILES spectral library and a continuity SFH prior. Additionally, we test a second model variant that changes to a bursty SFH prior (orange) and a third model that changes to the C3K spectral library (teal). The model spectrum and photomet… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Recovered tq between given pairs of model setups. In the left panel, we show the fiducial model (MILES spectral library; continuity SFH prior) versus the bursty prior variant. In the right panel, we compare the fiducial model to the variant adopting the C3K spectral library. Overall, we find that models with a bursty SFH prior systematically infer longer time since quenching than those with a continuity pr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In these panels, we compare the number density of quiescent galaxies reconstructed from SFHs in this work (open symbols) to values measured from a subset of direct observations in the literature, including RUBIES (A. Weibel et al. 2025a; Y. Zhang et al. 2026; filled symbols) and PANORAMIC (Z. Ji In Prep.; hatched bands). We show the number density reconstructed from the 2 < z < 3 quiescent population (blue… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Massive quiescent galaxies have been identified out to $z\sim7$ in early JWST data in a substantial excess ($\rm \gtrsim 1\,dex$ at $z>4$) of number densities from most theoretical predictions. We investigate whether the number densities implied by the star formation histories of quiescent galaxies at $2<z<5$ are consistent with the observed number density evolution of that population since $z>7$. For this work, we rely on stellar population synthesis modeling of JWST NIRCam photometry (from CEERS and PRIMER) and NIRSpec/PRISM spectra of massive ($\rm M_{*} > 10^{10.5}M_{\odot}$) quiescent galaxies in the RUBIES survey. We infer their star-formation histories through Bayesian spectro-photometric fitting with Prospector, exploring the sensitivity of our results to stellar libraries and SFH priors. For each source, we compute a timescale over which it would be identified as quiescent -- leveraging the recent and most robust SFH timescale -- and deduce the number density of the quiescent population at previous epochs. These reconstructed number densities are then compared to existing observational constraints, including a new measurement from the PANORAMIC pure parallel survey, whose wide-area and independent sightlines reduce sensitivity to cosmic variance. We find striking agreement between reconstructed and observed number densities up to $z\sim7$, a self-consistency that lends credence to stellar population synthesis modeling of distant quiescent galaxies. Furthermore, by connecting the recent ($\rm \sim 1\,Gyr$) star-formation histories and number densities of quiescent galaxies and their implied progenitors, we reinforce the known tension between observations and model predictions at $3<z<7$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates whether the number densities of massive quiescent galaxies at z>7 implied by back-projecting the recent star-formation histories (SFHs) of a 2<z<5 sample are consistent with direct observational constraints. Using JWST NIRCam photometry and NIRSpec/PRISM spectra from the RUBIES survey, the authors perform Bayesian spectro-photometric fitting with Prospector (exploring stellar libraries and SFH priors), derive a 'quiescent identification timescale' for each galaxy from its recent SFH, reconstruct the implied number density evolution, and compare to literature values plus a new wide-area measurement from the PANORAMIC survey. They report striking agreement up to z~7, which they interpret as support for the fidelity of stellar population synthesis modeling of distant quiescent galaxies, while also reinforcing the tension with theoretical predictions at 3<z<7.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies a valuable external consistency check on SPS modeling by connecting the recent (~1 Gyr) SFHs of intermediate-redshift quiescent galaxies to the observed number-density evolution at higher redshift. The inclusion of independent, wide-area PANORAMIC data to mitigate cosmic variance is a concrete strength. The analysis also bridges the 2<z<5 and z>7 populations and underscores the persistent observational excess relative to models.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods (Prospector fitting and SFH inference)] The reconstruction of past number densities hinges on the Prospector-derived 'timescale over which it would be identified as quiescent' being unbiased. While the text explores sensitivity to stellar libraries and SFH priors, no mock-data validation or recovery tests are shown for this specific timescale metric (or for the mapping from photometry+spectra to the last significant star-formation epoch), which is load-bearing for the agreement claim.
  2. [Sample selection and progenitor assumption] The 2<z<5 RUBIES sample is treated as an unbiased progenitor set for the z>7 population. No quantitative assessment of possible differential selection effects, merger-driven evolution, or progenitor bias is provided; if present, these would systematically alter the back-projected densities.
  3. [Results (number-density comparison)] The reported 'striking agreement' is presented largely qualitatively. Explicit quantitative comparison metrics (e.g., fractional residuals or goodness-of-fit per redshift bin) between the reconstructed densities and the observational constraints (including the new PANORAMIC points) are needed to substantiate the strength of the match.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the PANORAMIC measurement reduces sensitivity to cosmic variance but does not quote its redshift coverage, area, or the resulting number-density value; a one-sentence quantitative summary would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and legends for the number-density plots should explicitly distinguish reconstructed points, observed literature points, and the new PANORAMIC data, including error-bar definitions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the analysis and presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods (Prospector fitting and SFH inference)] The reconstruction of past number densities hinges on the Prospector-derived 'timescale over which it would be identified as quiescent' being unbiased. While the text explores sensitivity to stellar libraries and SFH priors, no mock-data validation or recovery tests are shown for this specific timescale metric (or for the mapping from photometry+spectra to the last significant star-formation epoch), which is load-bearing for the agreement claim.

    Authors: We agree that explicit mock recovery tests would provide stronger validation of the quiescent identification timescale. Although we already explored sensitivity to stellar libraries and SFH priors, we did not include dedicated recovery tests on simulated data. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection with recovery tests using mock galaxies generated via Prospector, quantifying the accuracy and any systematic biases in recovering the timescale and the implied last significant star-formation epoch. This will directly support the robustness of the back-projection method. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Sample selection and progenitor assumption] The 2<z<5 RUBIES sample is treated as an unbiased progenitor set for the z>7 population. No quantitative assessment of possible differential selection effects, merger-driven evolution, or progenitor bias is provided; if present, these would systematically alter the back-projected densities.

    Authors: The assumption that the observed 2<z<5 sample serves as representative progenitors is standard in this type of analysis, but we acknowledge that unaccounted differential selection or merger effects could introduce systematic offsets. A full quantitative assessment of these biases would require detailed cosmological simulations matched to the RUBIES selection function and merger histories, which lies outside the scope of this observational study focused on SFH inference. We will expand the discussion section with a qualitative assessment of possible progenitor biases and their potential impact, and we will add an explicit caveat in the conclusions. The close agreement between reconstructed and observed densities provides some empirical indication that large biases are unlikely, but we cannot fully quantify them here. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Results (number-density comparison)] The reported 'striking agreement' is presented largely qualitatively. Explicit quantitative comparison metrics (e.g., fractional residuals or goodness-of-fit per redshift bin) between the reconstructed densities and the observational constraints (including the new PANORAMIC points) are needed to substantiate the strength of the match.

    Authors: We agree that the strength of the agreement would be better substantiated with quantitative metrics. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit comparisons, including the ratio of reconstructed to observed number densities (with uncertainties) for each redshift bin and a simple goodness-of-fit statistic (e.g., reduced chi-squared) that incorporates the PANORAMIC measurements. These will be presented in an updated figure or accompanying table to allow readers to evaluate the match more rigorously. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A complete quantitative assessment of progenitor bias, differential selection effects, and merger-driven evolution, which would require extensive tailored cosmological simulations beyond the scope of this observational paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: SFH-based reconstruction compared to independent high-z observations

full rationale

The paper fits SFHs via Prospector to 2<z<5 JWST data, derives quiescent timescales per galaxy, and back-projects number densities at earlier epochs. These reconstructed densities are compared to separate observational constraints (including new PANORAMIC survey data). This constitutes an external benchmark rather than a closed loop. No quoted step reduces by construction to the inputs (no self-definitional mapping, no fitted parameter renamed as prediction within the same dataset, no load-bearing self-citation chain). The analysis is self-contained against external data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the accuracy of stellar population synthesis models and the representativeness of the observed sample; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • SFH prior parameters in Prospector
    The paper explicitly explores sensitivity to SFH priors, indicating these are adjustable parameters in the Bayesian fitting.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Stellar population synthesis models with chosen libraries accurately reproduce the spectral energy distributions of quiescent galaxies at 2<z<5
    Central to the Prospector fitting step described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The 2<z<5 quiescent sample is representative of the progenitors of the z>7 population
    Required for the back-tracking to be valid.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5727 in / 1372 out tokens · 33403 ms · 2026-05-10T18:57:17.654517+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    E5ѥ-koPURKTӼ#쓩 Sl I:O Tn ZG|; g /aʼ涎HnQM= qvbITvvb)X\Ӽ @\3U, JʷlwD7?)4𹲳 9;;Px/ Ki gx)-* PʲH ;|I*qvd9ó. X 8KN b>V gޑ N t3;;VŎ )ߞVX:OKh c CyZŎuMdN \>dw&Z6O, 3m| &5;?wD

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    work page arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    2023, title Beyond UVJ: Color Selection of Galaxies in the JWST Era , , 943, 166, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca294

    Antwi-Danso , J., Papovich , C., Leja , J., et al. 2023, title Beyond UVJ: Color Selection of Galaxies in the JWST Era , , 943, 166, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca294

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca294 2023

  5. [5]

    2025, title The FENIKS Survey: Spectroscopic Confirmation of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at z 3─5 , , 978, 90, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b30

    Antwi-Danso , J., Papovich , C., Esdaile , J., et al. 2025, title The FENIKS Survey: Spectroscopic Confirmation of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at z 3─5 , , 978, 90, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b30

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b30 2025

  6. [6]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, title Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  7. [7]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, title The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  8. [8]

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, title The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package , , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  9. [9]

    B., Finkelstein , S

    Bagley , M. B., Finkelstein , S. L., Koekemoer , A. M., et al. 2023, title CEERS Epoch 1 NIRCam Imaging: Reduction Methods and Simulations Enabling Early JWST Science Results , , 946, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/acbb08

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acbb08 2023

  10. [10]

    M., Valentino , F., Lagos , C

    Baker , W. M., Valentino , F., Lagos , C. d. P., et al. 2025 a , title Exploring over 700 massive quiescent galaxies at z = 2─7: Demographics and stellar mass functions , , 702, A270, 10.1051/0004-6361/202555829

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555829 2025

  11. [11]

    M., Lim , S., D'Eugenio , F., et al

    Baker , W. M., Lim , S., D'Eugenio , F., et al. 2025 b , title The abundance and nature of high-redshift quiescent galaxies from JADES spectroscopy and the FLAMINGO simulations , , 539, 557, 10.1093/mnras/staf475

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf475 2025

  12. [12]

    M., Ito , K., Valentino , F., et al

    Baker , W. M., Ito , K., Valentino , F., et al. 2026, title Double trouble: Two spectroscopically confirmed low-mass quiescent galaxies at z > 5 in overdensities , , 706, A91, 10.1051/0004-6361/202557207

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557207 2026

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Behroozi , P., Wechsler , R. H., Hearin , A. P., & Conroy , C. 2019, title UNIVERSEMACHINE: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0-10 , , 488, 3143, 10.1093/mnras/stz1182

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182 2019

  14. [14]

    Bellstedt , S., Robotham , A. S. G., Driver , S. P., et al. 2020, title Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): a forensic SED reconstruction of the cosmic star formation history and metallicity evolution by galaxy type , , 498, 5581, 10.1093/mnras/staa2620

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2620 2020

  15. [15]

    G., Slob , M., Kriek , M., et al

    Beverage , A. G., Slob , M., Kriek , M., et al. 2025, title Carbon and Iron Deficiencies in Quiescent Galaxies at z = 1 3 from JWST-SUSPENSE: Implications for the Formation Histories of Massive Galaxies , , 979, 249, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad96b6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad96b6 2025

  16. [16]

    CIGALE: a python Code Investigating GALaxy Emission

    Boquien , M., Burgarella , D., Roehlly , Y., et al. 2019, title CIGALE: a python Code Investigating GALaxy Emission , , 622, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 2019

  17. [17]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Boylan-Kolchin , M. 2023, title Stress testing CDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates , Nature Astronomy, 7, 731, 10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7 2023

  18. [18]

    2023, astropy/photutils: 1.8.0 , 1.8.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7946442

    Bradley , L. 2023, astropy/photutils: 1.8.0 , 1.8.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7946442

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7946442 2023

  19. [19]

    2023, grizli, v.1.9.11, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018

    Brammer, G. 2023 a , grizli, 1.9.11 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.8370018

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018 2023

  20. [20]

    2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    Brammer, G. 2023 b , msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319596 2023

  21. [21]

    The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-Forming Galaxies

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, title The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies , , 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  22. [22]

    and Leja, Joel and Johnson, Benjamin D

    Carnall , A. C., Leja , J., Johnson , B. D., et al. 2019, title How to Measure Galaxy Star Formation Histories. I. Parametric Models , , 873, 44, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab04a2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab04a2 2019

  23. [23]

    C., McLeod , D

    Carnall , A. C., McLeod , D. J., McLure , R. J., et al. 2023, title A surprising abundance of massive quiescent galaxies at 3 < z < 5 in the first data from JWST CEERS , , 520, 3974, 10.1093/mnras/stad369

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad369 2023

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Carnall , A. C., Cullen , F., McLure , R. J., et al. 2024, title The JWST EXCELS survey: too much, too young, too fast? Ultra-massive quiescent galaxies at 3 < z < 5 , , 534, 325, 10.1093/mnras/stae2092

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2092 2024

  25. [25]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier , G. 2003, title Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function , , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  26. [26]

    Chaikin , E., Schaye , J., Hu s ko , F., et al. 2026, title The importance of super-Eddington black hole accretion for the emergence of massive quiescent galaxies at high redshift , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.15207, 10.48550/arXiv.2601.15207

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.15207 2026

  27. [27]

    Chaikin , E., Schaye , J., Schaller , M., et al. 2025, title The evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function and star formation rates in the COLIBRE simulations from redshift 17 to 0 , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.07960, 10.48550/arXiv.2509.07960

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.07960 2025

  28. [28]

    Chandro-G \'o mez , \'A ., Lagos , C. d. P., Power , C., et al. 2025, title Unveiling the properties and origin of massive quenched galaxies at z 2 in the COLIBRE hydrodynamical simulations , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.16208, 10.48550/arXiv.2512.16208

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.16208 2025

  29. [29]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 1415, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1756

    Chevallard , J., & Charlot , S. 2016, title Modelling and interpreting spectral energy distributions of galaxies with BEAGLE , , 462, 1415, 10.1093/mnras/stw1756

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1756 2016

  30. [30]

    2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi , J., Dotter , A., Conroy , C., et al. 2016, title Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled Models , , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 2016

  31. [31]

    K., Lin , Y.-T., Ho , S., & Genel , S

    Chuang , C.-Y., Jespersen , C. K., Lin , Y.-T., Ho , S., & Genel , S. 2024, title Leaving No Branches Behind: Predicting Baryonic Properties of Galaxies from Merger Trees , , 965, 101, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2b6c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2b6c 2024

  32. [32]

    Cochrane , R. K. 2025, title Hierarchical assembly impedes the inference of stellar mass growth histories for individual galaxies , , 544, 1530, 10.1093/mnras/staf1568

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1568 2025

  33. [33]

    Conroy , C., & Gunn , J. E. 2010, title The Propagation of Uncertainties in Stellar Population Synthesis Modeling. III. Model Calibration, Comparison, and Evaluation , , 712, 833, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/2/833 2010

  34. [34]

    The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling I: The relevance of uncertain aspects of stellar evolution and the IMF to the derived physical properties of galaxies

    Conroy , C., Gunn , J. E., & White , M. 2009, title The Propagation of Uncertainties in Stellar Population Synthesis Modeling. I. The Relevance of Uncertain Aspects of Stellar Evolution and the Initial Mass Function to the Derived Physical Properties of Galaxies , , 699, 486, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/486 2009

  35. [35]

    E., Whitaker , K

    Cutler , S. E., Whitaker , K. E., Weaver , J. R., et al. 2024, title Two Distinct Classes of Quiescent Galaxies at Cosmic Noon Revealed by JWST PRIMER and UNCOVER , , 967, L23, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad464c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad464c 2024

  36. [36]

    2024, title Ionised gas kinematics and dynamical masses of z 6 galaxies from JADES/NIRSpec high-resolution spectroscopy , , 684, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347755

    de Graaff , A., Rix , H.-W., Carniani , S., et al. 2024, title Ionised gas kinematics and dynamical masses of z 6 galaxies from JADES/NIRSpec high-resolution spectroscopy , , 684, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347755

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347755 2024

  37. [37]

    J., Brammer , G., et al

    de Graaff , A., Setton , D. J., Brammer , G., et al. 2025 a , title Efficient formation of a massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.9 , Nature Astronomy, 9, 280, 10.1038/s41550-024-02424-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02424-3 2025

  38. [38]

    2025 b , title RUBIES: A complete census of the bright and red distant Universe with JWST/NIRSpec , , 697, A189, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452186

    de Graaff , A., Brammer , G., Weibel , A., et al. 2025 b , title RUBIES: A complete census of the bright and red distant Universe with JWST/NIRSpec , , 697, A189, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452186

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452186 2025

  39. [39]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 3201, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1557

    Dekel , A., Sarkar , K. C., Birnboim , Y., Mandelker , N., & Li , Z. 2023, title Efficient formation of massive galaxies at cosmic dawn by feedback-free starbursts , , 523, 3201, 10.1093/mnras/stad1557

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1557 2023

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Donnan , C. T., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2024, title JWST PRIMER: a new multifield determination of the evolving galaxy UV luminosity function at redshifts z ≃ 9 - 15 , , 533, 3222, 10.1093/mnras/stae2037

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2037 2024

  41. [41]

    Z., & Levesque , E

    Dorn-Wallenstein , T. Z., & Levesque , E. M. 2020, title A Comparison of Rotating and Binary Stellar Evolution Models: Effects on Massive Star Populations , , 896, 164, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8d28

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8d28 2020

  42. [42]

    2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 Ekstr¨ om, S., Georgy, C., Eggenberger, P., et al

    Dotter , A. 2016, title MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the Construction of Stellar Isochrones , , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 2016

  43. [43]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein , D. J., Willott , C., Alberts , S., et al. 2023 a , title Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES) , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.02465, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02465

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.02465 2023

  44. [44]

    J., Johnson , B

    Eisenstein , D. J., Johnson , B. D., Robertson , B., et al. 2023 b , title The JADES Origins Field: A New JWST Deep Field in the JADES Second NIRCam Data Release , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.12340, 10.48550/arXiv.2310.12340

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.12340 2023

  45. [45]

    J., Stanway, E

    Eldridge , J. J., Stanway , E. R., Xiao , L., et al. 2017, title Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis Version 2.1: Construction, Observational Verification, and New Results , , 34, e058, 10.1017/pasa.2017.51

    work page Pith review doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.51 2017

  46. [46]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Falc \'o n-Barroso , J., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Vazdekis , A., et al. 2011, title An updated MILES stellar library and stellar population models , , 532, A95, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116842

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116842 2011

  47. [47]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 3986, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1095

    Ferrara , A., Pallottini , A., & Dayal , P. 2023, title On the stunning abundance of super-early, luminous galaxies revealed by JWST , , 522, 3986, 10.1093/mnras/stad1095

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1095 2023

  48. [48]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M. B., Ferguson , H. C., et al. 2023, title CEERS Key Paper. I. An Early Look into the First 500 Myr of Galaxy Formation with JWST , , 946, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/acade4

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acade4 2023

  49. [49]

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9 , arxivId =

    Glazebrook , K., Nanayakkara , T., Schreiber , C., et al. 2024, title A massive galaxy that formed its stars at z 11 , , 628, 277, 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9 2024

  50. [50]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene , J. E., Labbe , I., Goulding , A. D., et al. 2024, title UNCOVER Spectroscopy Confirms the Surprising Ubiquity of Active Galactic Nuclei in Red Sources at z > 5 , , 964, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  51. [51]

    L., Whitaker , K

    Hamadouche , M. L., Whitaker , K. E., Valentino , F., et al. 2026, title DeepDive: Tracing the early quenching pathways of massive quiescent galaxies at z>3 from their star-formation histories and chemical abundances , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.02485, 10.48550/arXiv.2602.02485

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.02485 2026

  52. [52]

    E., Brammer , G

    Heintz , K. E., Brammer , G. B., Watson , D., et al. 2025, title The JWST-PRIMAL archival survey: A JWST/NIRSpec reference sample for the physical properties and Lyman- absorption and emission of 600 galaxies at z = 5.0 ‑ 13.4 , , 693, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450243

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450243 2025

  53. [53]

    Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results

    Hinshaw , G., Larson , D., Komatsu , E., et al. 2013, title Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results , , 208, 19, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 2013

  54. [54]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, title Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  55. [55]

    G., & Baugh , C

    Hu s ko , F., Lacey , C. G., & Baugh , C. M. 2023, title The buildup of galaxies and their spheroids: The contributions of mergers, disc instabilities, and star formation , , 518, 5323, 10.1093/mnras/stac3152

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3152 2023

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Hviding , R. E., de Graaff , A., Miller , T. B., et al. 2025, title RUBIES: A spectroscopic census of little red dots: All point sources with v-shaped continua have broad lines , , 702, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/202555816

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555816 2025

  57. [57]

    2025, title A merging pair of massive quiescent galaxies at z = 3.44 in the Cosmic Vine , , 697, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453211

    Ito , K., Valentino , F., Farcy , M., et al. 2025, title A merging pair of massive quiescent galaxies at z = 3.44 in the Cosmic Vine , , 697, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453211

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453211 2025

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Jespersen , C. K., Carnall , A. C., & Lovell , C. C. 2025 a , title Explaining Ultramassive Quiescent Galaxies at 3 < z < 5 in the Context of Their Environments , , 988, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/adeb7c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adeb7c 2025

  59. [59]

    K., Cranmer , M., Melchior , P., et al

    Jespersen , C. K., Cranmer , M., Melchior , P., et al. 2022, title Mangrove: Learning Galaxy Properties from Merger Trees , , 941, 7, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b18

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b18 2022

  60. [60]

    The Optical and Infrared Are Connected

    Jespersen , C. K., Melchior , P., Spergel , D. N., et al. 2025 b , title The optical and infrared are connected , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.03816, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.03816

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.03816 2025

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Jespersen , C. K., Steinhardt , C. L., Somerville , R. S., & Lovell , C. C. 2025 c , title On the Significance of Rare Objects at High Redshift: The Impact of Cosmic Variance , , 982, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/adb422

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb422 2025

  62. [62]

    In Prep., title PANORAMIC: The Dawn of Massive Quiescent Galaxies

    Ji, Z. In Prep., title PANORAMIC: The Dawn of Massive Quiescent Galaxies. I. Number Density and Cosmic Variance from 1000 arcmin ^2 NIRCam Imaging,

  63. [63]

    B., Magdis, G

    Jin , S., Sillassen , N. B., Magdis , G. E., et al. 2024, title Cosmic Vine: A z = 3.44 large-scale structure hosting massive quiescent galaxies , , 683, L4, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348540

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348540 2024

  64. [64]

    2017, bd-j/prospector: Initial release, v0.1 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.1116491

    Johnson, B., & Leja, J. 2017, bd-j/prospector: Initial release, v0.1 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.1116491

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.1116491 2017

  65. [65]

    2021, dfm/python-fsps: python-fsps v0.4.0, v0.4.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.4577191

    Johnson, B., Foreman-Mackey, D., Sick, J., et al. 2021, dfm/python-fsps: python-fsps v0.4.0, v0.4.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.4577191

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4577191 2021

  66. [66]

    2024, title A Massive Quiescent Galaxy in a Group Environment at z = 4.53 , , 963, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ff1

    Kakimoto , T., Tanaka , M., Onodera , M., et al. 2024, title A Massive Quiescent Galaxy in a Group Environment at z = 4.53 , , 963, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ff1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ff1 2024

  67. [67]

    2026, title Connecting Environment, Star Formation History, and Morphology of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at 3 < z < 4 with JWST , , 997, 29, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0a18

    Kawinwanichakij , L., Glazebrook , K., Nanayakkara , T., et al. 2026, title Connecting Environment, Star Formation History, and Morphology of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at 3 < z < 4 with JWST , , 997, 29, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0a18

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0a18 2026

  68. [68]

    2013, ApJ, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    Kriek , M., & Conroy , C. 2013, title The Dust Attenuation Law in Distant Galaxies: Evidence for Variation with Spectral Type , , 775, L16, 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/l16 2013

  69. [69]

    Lagos , C. d. P., Valentino , F., Wright , R. J., et al. 2025, title The diverse star formation histories of early massive, quenched galaxies in modern galaxy formation simulations , , 536, 2324, 10.1093/mnras/stae2626

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2626 2025

  70. [70]

    How to Measure Galaxy Star Formation Histories II: Nonparametric Models

    Leja , J., Carnall , A. C., Johnson , B. D., Conroy , C., & Speagle , J. S. 2019, title How to Measure Galaxy Star Formation Histories. II. Nonparametric Models , , 876, 3, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c

    work page Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c 2019

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    Leja , J., Johnson , B. D., Conroy , C., van Dokkum , P. G., & Byler , N. 2017, title Deriving Physical Properties from Broadband Photometry with Prospector: Description of the Model and a Demonstration of its Accuracy Using 129 Galaxies in the Local Universe , , 837, 170, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe 2017

  72. [72]

    2022, title Accelerating Early Massive Galaxy Formation with Primordial Black Holes , , 937, L30, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac927f

    Liu , B., & Bromm , V. 2022, title Accelerating Early Massive Galaxy Formation with Primordial Black Holes , , 937, L30, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac927f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac927f 2022

  73. [73]

    S., Antwi-Danso , J., Lambrides , E

    Long , A. S., Antwi-Danso , J., Lambrides , E. L., et al. 2024, title Efficient NIRCam Selection of Quiescent Galaxies at 3 < z < 6 in CEERS , , 970, 68, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4cea

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4cea 2024

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    Matthee , J., Naidu , R. P., Brammer , G., et al. 2024, title Little Red Dots: An Abundant Population of Faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z 5 Revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST Surveys , , 963, 129, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  75. [75]

    2025 a , title Excavating The Ruins: an Ancient z=2.675 Galaxy Which Formed in the First 500 Myr , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.05752, 10.48550/arXiv.2508.05752

    McConachie , I., Antwi-Danso , J., Chang , W., et al. 2025 a , title Excavating The Ruins: an Ancient z=2.675 Galaxy Which Formed in the First 500 Myr , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.05752, 10.48550/arXiv.2508.05752

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.05752 2025

  76. [76]

    V., et al

    McConachie , I., de Graaff , A., Maseda , M. V., et al. 2025 b , title Where Galaxies Go to Die: The Environments of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at 3<z<5 , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.25024, 10.48550/arXiv.2510.25024

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.25024 2025

  77. [77]

    P., Somerville , R

    Moster , B. P., Somerville , R. S., Maulbetsch , C., et al. 2010, title Constraints on the Relationship between Stellar Mass and Halo Mass at Low and High Redshift , , 710, 903, 10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/903

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/710/2/903 2010

  78. [78]

    Muzzin , A., Marchesini , D., Stefanon , M., et al. 2013, title A Public K _ s -selected Catalog in the COSMOS/ULTRAVISTA Field: Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Stellar Population Parameters , , 206, 8, 10.1088/0067-0049/206/1/8

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/206/1/8 2013

  79. [79]

    2025, title The Formation Histories of Massive and Quiescent Galaxies in the 3 < z < 4.5 Universe , , 981, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/ada6ac

    Nanayakkara , T., Glazebrook , K., Schreiber , C., et al. 2025, title The Formation Histories of Massive and Quiescent Galaxies in the 3 < z < 4.5 Universe , , 981, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/ada6ac

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada6ac 2025

  80. [80]

    Analysis of galaxy SEDs from far-UV to far-IR with CIGALE: Studying a SINGS test sample

    Noll , S., Burgarella , D., Giovannoli , E., et al. 2009, title Analysis of galaxy spectral energy distributions from far-UV to far-IR with CIGALE: studying a SINGS test sample , , 507, 1793, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    work page Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912497 2009

Showing first 80 references.